Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Configuration Steering Board
[Program Title]
•
This template is consolidated for all lifecycle phases. Refer
to notes pages for phase-specific instructions/tailoring.
•
Briefing should focus on the current lifecycle phase of the
program.
•
Unless otherwise stated, all charts are required.
•
Updated Mar 2015.
•
Please see notes pages for further explanation/guidance.
Rank, Name
Office Symbol
1
Why We Are Here Today

Information to include:
 Reference Tech Baseline
 List of Deltas/Changes Approved by PEO or SAE
 Cost of Deltas/Changes to Program and AF Enterprise
 Rationale for Deltas/Changes
 Proposed recommendations to change the program

BLUF Example:
 “Program” Increment III (98% expended)
 No significant development activity remaining
 “Program” Inc IV (focus of CSB)
 No funding vs requirements mismatches in program profile
 No change in requirements since Inc IV MS B, Apr 11
 Potential descoping options
Integrity - Service - Excellence
2
Interrelationships, Dependencies and
Synchronization with Complementary
Systems
Aviation Platforms:
KC-135
KC-10
AWACS
H/MH-60
CV-22
MH-47
MH-6
CH-53
A/OA-10
Ground Teams:
GAWS
SF
SEAL
STS
HC/MC-130 Recap
Mission Planning
PFPS
JMPS
Be sure to include CYBER links and
infrastructure.
C-130J:
Indicate any issues/cybersecurity
risks
introduced by
Aircraft Procurement
program interconnection.
LAIRCM
& Block Upgrades
Solid denotes current system
Dash denotes future system
Arrow to Recap denotes supports Recap
Arrow from Recap denotes Recap supports
Indicates program are interdependent
3
No known issues affecting inter-related programs
Resolvable interface issues affecting programs
Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Program X Schedule
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
IOC
MDD
FY11
FY12
FY13
FDDR
MAIS List
Milestones
FY10
AFRB
FOC
RIT
Requirements
Review/Management Board
ICD
Requirements
Annual
X-Plan
System/Architecture Studies
Design & Integration
Highlight critical path.
Acquisition
Test & Evaluation
OUE
OT&E
Procurement
Operations & Support
Strategic & focused on Milestones and critical events between milestones.
Must communicate schedule changes
Integrity - Service - Excellence
4
Acquisition to O&S Cost Ratio
Total Required Acq (BY$M):
4,456
Total Required O&S (BY$M):
10,358
Program Funding & Quantities
($ in Millions / Then Year)
RDT&E
Prior $ (PB 15)
Current $ (PB 16)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
Prior
FY15
FY16
108.0
108.0
108.0
-
32.4
30.0
(2.4)
32.4
(2.4)
FY18
FY19
FY20
Curr Est
D Current
55.7M
+4.6%
50.4M
-3.2%
D Original
+10.2%
+60.2%
FY16-20 To Comp Prog Total
44.2
43.1
(1.1)
44.2
(1.1)
45.1
45.6
0.5
45.6
-
37.9
38.3
0.4
46.0
(7.7)
12.4
12.5
0.1
15.0
(2.5)
5.3
5.4
0.1
6.5
(1.1)
3.2
3.2
4.0
(0.8)
103.9
105.0
1.1
117.1
(12.1)
-
288.5
286.1
(2.4)
301.7
(15.6)
Prim ary Line Item s: APPN 0300D - BA 2 - BLI 1000CV2200; APPN 1506N - BA 1 - BLI 0164; APPN 3010F - BA 4 - BLI V022A0
-
99.9
99.5
(0.4)
99.9
(0.4)
MILCON
150.4
148.2
(2.2)
150.4
(2.2)
200.2
203.1
2.9
203.1
-
304.8
309.2
4.4
312.3
(3.1)
618.6
522.9
(95.7)
528.1
(5.2)
627.6
530.5
(97.1)
535.8
(5.3)
360.1
538.1
178.0
543.5
(5.4)
2,111.3
2,103.8
(7.6)
2,122.8
(19.0)
2,257.3
1,954.5
(302.8)
1,974.1
(19.5)
4,618.9
4,306.0
(313.0)
4,347.1
(41.2)
Prim ary Line Item s: APPN 0500D - BA 1 - PE 1140494BB; APPN 1205N - BA 1 - PE 0204696N
Prior $ (PB 15)
Current $ (PB 16)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
-
-
-
6.1
6.1
6.1
-
SYSTEM O&M2
Prior $ (PB 15)
Current $ (PB 16)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
1.3
1.4
0.1
1.4
-
1.6
1.7
0.1
1.7
-
Prior $ (PB 15)
Current $ (PB 16)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
3
-
2.1
2.0
(0.1)
2.0
-
2.3
2.1
(0.2)
2.1
-
3.0
3.0
3.0
-
9.0
8.8
(0.2)
8.8
-
15.3
12.6
(2.7)
12.6
-
25.6
22.8
(2.8)
22.8
-
Prim ary Line Item s: APPN 0100D - BA 1 - PE 1120172BB; APPN 1106N - BA 1 - PE 0206312M
8.3
8.3
8.3
-
10.4
11.4
1.0
11.4
-
TOTAL
QUANTITIES
FY17
(BY yyyy)
PAUC:
APUC:
Prim ary Line Item s: APPN 0400D - BA 7 - PE 1160403BB; APPN 1319N - BA 5 - PE 0604262N; APPN 3600F - BA 5 - PE 0401318F
PROCUREMENT
Prior $ (PB 15)
Current $ (PB 16)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
FY14
30%
70%
108.0
108.0
108.0
-
138.4
135.6
(2.8)
138.4
(2.8)
204.2
201.0
(3.2)
204.3
(3.3)
257.3
261.8
4.5
261.8
-
26.5
29.2
2.7
29.2
- Do
37.8
55.0
91.4
41.6
60.5
98.6
3.8
5.5
7.2
41.6
60.5
98.6
- any BCA
not- disclose
221.1
241.2
20.1
241.2
funding
5,904.8
(5,904.8)
levels
past
235.5
255.6
20.1
6,160.4
(5,904.8)
FY16
as
they are not official AF position. However, if BCA
in the457.7
out years
will cause
369.2funding
670.9 levels
690.2
2,445.3
2,272.6
5,168.5
376.6disconnects,
579.0
598.5
642.9
1,967.1sense.
4,870.5
highlight
them2,458.8
in a generic
If
7.4
(91.9)
(91.7)
185.2
13.5
(305.5)
(298.0)
there586.7
is major
cause649.1
for concern,
provide
a BCA
387.4
604.9
2,489.9
7,891.4
10,832.0
Spruill
Chart
separately
from
the
CSB
briefing
that
(10.8)
(7.7)
(6.4)
(6.2)
(31.1)
(5,924.3)
(5,961.5)
can be given to leadership for AF eyes only.
Prior Qty (PB 15)
0
2
3
4
6
12
12
0
34
41
80
Current Qty (PB 16)
0
2
3
4
6
10
10
10
40
35
80
Delta Qty (Current - Prior)
0
0
0
0
0
(2)
(2)
10
6
(6)
0
Required1 Qty
0
2
3
4
6
9
9
9
37
38
80
Delta Qty (Current - Required)
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
(3)
0
Note 1. Requirement Source: [e.g., OSD CAPE ICE, Oct 2013]
Note 2. O&M requirement assumes [e.g., a service life to 2035; includes ctr field mx, petro/oil/lube, spare/repair parts, depot mx, sustaining engineering & software mx.]
This line does not include of $8.3M (FY15-19) of Acquisition-related O&M for program office expenses, nor does it include O&M-funded disposal costs.
Note 3. Quantities in FY14-15 are funded with RDT&E
version PB 16.1
5
Affordability Analysis
FY11 Congressional
Reduction -$65M
Affordability Cap
(BY13$B)
Current
Estimate
(BY13$B)
2.0
1.9
30% Reduction to RDT&E Budget FY08-19
FY14-15 Sequestration
Reductions
Increment 3.1
Future
Increments
APUC
Increment 3.2A
U6
CTF Infrastructure
F-22 Tactical
Mandates
U5
O&S*
10.0
9.0
Increment 3.2B
Lab Infrastructure
*Indicate whether O&S is for entire weapon system or the
ACAT I program in question
Adv Tech Dev
Other
Affordability Challenge
Mitigation
Requirement A is more difficult, more
costly to achieve than expected at APB
Reduce threshold to X -- maintain
current affordability cap
Increase affordability cap -- critical
capability adds distinct value, more
expensive to wait for future increment
User-Requested addition of
Requirement B
Integrity - Service - Excellence
6
Should Cost Summary
$M
Will Cost Estimate
FY12
Budget Authority
81.6
[Current Year] PB
FY13
62.4
100.0
100.0
(1.4)
(11.0)
[Should Cost Initiative Title]
Phase 1 Test Activities
Phase 2 (Contract Award)
Flight Body-2
Streamline Training
Net Should Cost Savings
Total Should Cost Estimate
FY14
33.0
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
To
Complete
Total
1,090.7
198.4
213.5
207.9
153.7
97.3
42.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
500.0
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(24.6)
(22.5)
(24.5)
(23.2)
800.0
(6.4)
(11.0)
(70.3)
(24.5)
(26.0)
(26.0)
0.0
100.0
(12.4)
87.6
(1.0)
99.0
(1.0)
99.0
(25.6)
74.4
(48.0)
52.0
(50.2)
49.8
0.0
100.0
(138.2)
661.8
375.2
Realized
Projected
Realized
• FY13:
• FY13:
$ 1.400M; EMD Phase 1 Aircraft Integration
If savings have been realized, be prepared to discuss
$11.000M; EMD Phase 1 Test Activities
Projected
• FY16-FY18:
• FY 17:
• FY18:
$70.292M; EMD Phase 2 (Contract Award) Source Selection Savings
$24.500M; Flight Body-2
$26.000M; EMD Phase 2 Test Activities
where that money went (ex. Elsewhere in the PEO
portfolio, back to the AF, etc)
Integrity - Service - Excellence
New and Evolving
Threat Analysis
New / Evolved Threat
Requirements
Challenge
Mitigation
New adversary
capability X
Requirement C may
not be sufficient for
future missions
Engage AFROC process; New
capability will start new ACAT
enhancement program if
>$100M
New adversary
capability Y
Intel Mission Data
Requirements will not
account for new threat
Work with AF/A2 to ensure all
IMD req’ts can be met within
existing budget
New adversary
capability Z
Connectivity with
program A will create a
Cyber Vulnerability
Remove requirement to
connect to program A
Integrity - Service - Excellence
8
Change Management &
Governance
AF Configuration Steering Board (CSB)
SAE Chaired
Annual and Special Request
Approve/disapprove changes that impact cost
and Schedule
HQs AF
Requirements & Planning Council
(R&PC)
Co-Chairs: User and PEO
Approve changes that do not
impact cost and schedule
PEO/User
CCB
Program Office
TRB
Stakeholders:

Sponsor
Command/Functional

Users

External Agencies (ex.
DOE, USSTRATCOM,
DISA)

Other Services

Etc.
FRRB
Technical Team
Integrity - Service - Excellence
9
Requirements Changes (+/-)
since last CSB
New / Refined
Requirement
Threshold /
Objective
Rationale for
New Req.
Current
Est.
Cost/Sched
Impact
Approved /
Authority
7500 lbs / 6600
lbs
AMC/A3/5 identified
new weight
requirement updated
to allow transport in …
7650 lbs
$$ Increase: AMC
providing funding
No Schedule impact
PENDING /
CSB
Resolution
7 cm / 5 cm
New threat identified
by xxxx and being
worked through
AFROC that …
6.8 cm
Threat to MS-C
Schedule – need
requirement
finalized by XXX to
maintain schedule
PENDING /
CSB
Example 3
4.0
Reallocation
4.0
N/A
YES / CCB
15JAN14
Weight
Do not limit to just new KPPs/KSAs or changes to
CDD/CPD. Also, include updates or refinement to
requirements identified by the User or other
organizations.
Integrity - Service - Excellence
10
Configuration Update
Not Required for Pre-MS B programs.
Previous 12 Months
ECP
Performance
Impact
Schedule
Impact
Cost Impact
Interfaces
Affected
Approved /
Authority
Disconnected
Waypoints
Incorporates more
operationally
relevant method of
handling nonsequenced points
during route
planning
None. Change
incorporated in
subsequent,
planned release
$200M Total
across FYDP
User Interface
only
PENDING / CSB
Allows for proper
handling of
mission data loads
for multiple
aircraft OFPs from
single workstation
None. Change
incorporated in
subsequent,
planned release
$569K – all FY08
funds
User Interface
only
APPROVED /
CCB
Mission Data
Load Handler
Next 12 Months
ECP
None
Performance
Impact
N/A
Schedule
Impact
N/A
Interfaces
Approved /
CostIdentify
Impact
all ECPs affecting form, fit
Authority
or function from Affected
past 12 months
and all anticipated during the next
12
months.
N/A
N/A
Integrity - Service - Excellence
N/A
11
Potential Descoping Options
Option
User Capability
Assessment and
Perf Impact
Defer Mode S
Low-to-med impact in FY08-13
timeframe: Risks denial to
European airspace
Reduce sensor
resolutions by
50%
Impact to
remaining
program
Investment
to date
Savings
No impact
$12M spent of an
estimated $36M
effort
$24M Total:
$3M FY08
$8M FY09
$10M FY10
$3M FY11
$3M spent in risk
reduction; total
effort estimated at
$87M
$84M Total:
$2M FY08
$7M FY09
$15M FY10
$23M FY11
$28M FY12
$9M FY13
Med impact in FY10-11 and
High impact in FY12-21:
Inability to …
Changes critical
path to xxxx;
reduces schedule
risk by four
months
* What would program
descope to address a
FUNDING CUT
Provide three or four options based on input from user on
requirements, impact to programs ability execute
remaining program, and % of costs already invested.
Etc.
Integrity - Service - Excellence
12
Issues

This is an opportunity to communicate/discuss
program issues with the SAE

Discuss any issues that are of a particular concern to
the PEO and PM. Examples might be:








OSD Oversight issues
Funding instability
Requirements instability
Technical transition issues
Sustainment planning/execution issues
Congressional Interest
New User unfunded requirements/refinements
Be clear about what help you request and from whom
Integrity - Service - Excellence
13