Challenge in Legacy Studies Converting to CDISC – A Case Study

advertisement

Challenge in Legacy Studies

Converting to CDISC

A Case Study from MacroStat

Weijin Gan

Manager, Macrostat

July 2012

Background

12 Legacy studies of the same compound, Neurology disease, CSR Completed.

5 studies, Phase II - Phase III

7 studies, Phase I – Phase II

Objective : Convert legacy data to CDISC standard

(SDTM/ADaM) for FDA submission.

(The submission includes 37 studies in total, 12 studies were done by our group)

The challenges we face

How to ensure CDISC compliance

SDTM / ADaM

How to ensure the compliance with CSR

How to ensure consistency cross studies

Data Flow

Raw Data

Blank CRF

SDTM IG

Statistician

Programmer

Annotated CRF

SDTM

SDTM Spec

Excel mapping spreadsheet

CDISC expert review

Sponsor review

CSR QC

Report

Legacy

Study CSR

ADaM Data

ADaM Spec

Excel mapping spreadsheet

SDTM Data

SAP

ADaM IG

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

How to map CRF data to SDTM Domain

2 core SDTM spec  SDTM mapping for all studies  aCFR and SDTM spec reviews.

1) STDM IG provide very specific mapping rule and a lot example.

2) Consult CDISC expert for special case.

3) Not every variable have clear mapping solution in SDTM. It can be done in different way

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

CASE1 : –SP vs. –OTH

“specified” map to –SP

“other, specify” map to –OTH

CASE2: “Not submitted”

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

Case3: CO vs. SUPP —

Comment to each domain could go to CO domain or SUPP- domain

Case4: DA vs. EX

Drug Accountability CRF may dosage information and should go into EX domain, rather than the DA domain

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

Tools to check SDTM compliance

 OpenCDISC

 WebSDM

All error messages from OpenCDISC reports need to be checked and resolved

All warning messages from OpenCDISC should be commented appropriately

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

Keep aCRF, SDTM spec and SDTM consistent

1) Variables in aCRF match SDTM spec

2) The list of Controlled Terminology matches the actual values in the datasets (Value level Metadata)

3) Variable role matches SDTM IG

4) Variable attributes match the datasets

The ultimate purpose is to keep the define.xml consistent with the SDTM.

Challenge - SDTM Compliance

Example of Consistency check across aCRF, SDTM spec and SDTM

Challenge - ADaM Compliance

• Develop ADaM specification based on SAP

• ADaM spec underwent several internal and external reviews

• SAS program checked about 183 rules from ADaM IG.

Such as

1) Name convention

2) Variable attributes

3) Value level matches the ADaM dataset

4) Required variable in ADSL

5) Data Point Traceability

6) One-to-one mapping of variable value

……

Challenge - ADaM Compliance

Example of ADaM compliance check

Challenge - CSR Validation

• Replicate Key table of CSR

• Investigate and document discrepancies between output from CDISC dataset and CSR table. Create QC report for each study

Sample of QC report

Challenge - CSR Validation

• Without the original program code and analysis dataset, investigating discrepancies was very difficult.

Possible reason of discrepancy

1) Different raw data

2) Different version of the WHO drug dictionary / MedDRA

3) Algorithm applied differently, e.g. visit mapping, LOCF, imputation of missing values

4) Data issue

Challenge - Consistency Across Studies

Tremendous effort was spent to keep the STDM/ADaM consistent across the studies.

1. Core spec prepared at beginning

2. Core team reviewed aCRF/spec across studies to check the consistency

3. SAS program checks the consistency of variable names and attribute across studies

Lesson Learned

• Checking SDTM/ADaM compliance still relies on manual review, especially in the early stages

Although there are tools to check compliance, such as openCDISC, WebSDM, these tools only work after

SDTM/ADaM datasets were created. Spotting issues at early stages helps to avoid re-work after SDTM/ADaM creation. Finding major issues at early stages, eg. aCFR mapping, data structure, relies on the statistician's knowledge of CDISC. Tools do help a lot. Full automation of compliance check is not always possible.

Lesson Learned

• With the general CDISC knowledge, the mapping rule of some special domains or endpoints can be quickly learned from CDISC expert

• Additional effort is needed to QC and maintain

SDTM/ADaM spec, if define.xml will be created.

Lesson Learned

• Prepare the programming team with CDISC knowledge is essential

Some useful knowledge

ISO 8601 date format

Controlled Terminology, extensibles vs. Non-extensibles

-SEQ base on the keys specified in CDISC Standards Library

Timing Variables for BDS Datasets ADY , ADT, AVISIT

Question?

Thank You !

Download