Distribution Network Planning

Daniel Desrosiers, P. Eng

Engineering Consulting Services

1

What is Planning?

• Planning (also called forethought ) is the process of thinking about and organizing the activities required to achieve a desired goal.

• Planning involves the creation and maintenance of a plan . As such, planning is a fundamental property of intelligent behavior . This thought process is essential to the creation and refinement of a plan , or integration of it with other plans; that is, it combines forecasting of developments with the preparation of scenarios of how to react to them.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

2

Network Planning Goals

Reach all consumers wanting to be connected.

Meet their demand.

Provide satisfactory power supply reliability.

Provide power supply quality.

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

3

Planning and Forecast

• An important, albeit often ignored aspect of planning, is the relationship it holds with forecasting. Forecasting can be described as predicting what the future will look like, whereas planning predicts what the future should look like.

[1] The counterpart to planning is spontaneous order .

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

4

Planning Overview

The evolution of a distribution power system comprises a number of stages of development

Although capacity, security and quality/efficiency of supply are of concern throughout the development of a system, the focus shifts over time.

In the early stages of rapid load growth or reconstruction, the priority is to build sufficient capacity to meet the load demands.

Following establishment of the network and loads, security of supply becomes a critical factor.

Once the system has matured, the focus is on optimization in terms of supply quality and efficiency.

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

5 5

The Environment

S TRATEGIC P LANNING

S UBTRANSMISSION

N ETWORK

G ENERATION

C APACITY

R ENEWABLE AND

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY

SOLUTIONS

D ISTRIBUTION

N ETWORK P LANNING

C ITY /T OWN P LANNING

L OAD F ORECASTING

C USTOMER C ONNECTIONS

J OIN WORKING WITH

OTHER UTILITIES

N ETWORK O PERATIONS

& S YSTEM DESIGN

A SSETS MANAGEMENT

AND C APITAL / RESOURCES

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

P LANNING

P ROTECTION , R ELIABILITY

AND Q UALITY OF SUPPLY

6

High Level Planning Process

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

7

Network Analysis Part

Start

Introduce new loads, Apply

Load growth

Get Reference network

YEAR n

Yearly T&D

Scheduled

Projects and

Improvements for YEAR n+1

Obtain New Yearly

Network Model

Run

Simulations

Update future yearly projects list

Increment YEAR counter

No

>Last

Year

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

Yes

Review and optimize projects plan

Identify and validate solutions

No

All ok?

Yes

Network becomes the Reference network for year n+1

The

End

8

Finding Solutions

Network

Solutions

Risk

Assessment

Identify and validate solutions

Technical and financial

Compare

Solutions

Non-Network

Solutions

Preliminary

$ Estimate

Recommendation

Update Projects list

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

9

Why use modern power system tools?

• Although most network planning related calculations could be done by hand, doing so will limit the number of studied solutions

• Using modern power system analysis tools makes it easy to create multiple project scenarios thus increasing planning quality

• Single data entry + Automation of data integration from multiple sources

• Territory or sub network approach allowing quick check of the entire network performance

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

10

Modern Power System Software is to planning what spreadsheet software was to accounting in the 80’

A wise man at Cooper/Cyme

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

11

Power System Analysis Tools

What should we look for :

• It should be flexible allowing variable focus for the studies

• It should allow easy integration of forecast

• Provide on demand recalculation

• Answer questions, support decisions

• Complete: take into consideration all the environment and integrate various data sources

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

12

Keeping up with the network!

Analysis

Load Flow

Load Allocation

Load Balancing

Load Flow with Profile

Network Forecaster

Fault Analysis

Capacitor Placement

Protective Device coordination

Load Flow Contingency

Voltage Stability - PV Approach

Single contingency Resoration

Service Restoration

Switching Optimization

Arc Flash Hazards

Volt/Var Optimization

Long Term Dynamic

Reliability Assessment

Harmonic

Transient Stability

Optimal Power Flow

Motor Start

Safety







Load









Focus





 

 



Quality /

Time Capacity Security

Efficiency

































 



 

 



© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

13

Environment – Network Connection

- ESRI ArcGIS 9.x

- Smallworld 3.3, 4.x

- Intergraph G/Technology 9.4

- LoadStar

- PI-Historian

- WireVision

- AMR

- etc.

- DMS

- OMS

- SCADA

- Maximo

- etc.

GIS

Geographic, Connectivity,

Settings

Customer

Information

Loads, consumption, demands

Enterprise

Systems

Settings, events history

CYMDIST Gateway

CYMDIST

Network

Model

- Oracle 9, 10, 11

- SQL Server 2000, 2005, 2008

- MS Access 2000/2003

- Self-Contained Study (XML)

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

14

Study case 1: PF correction

Problem: Reducing losses associated with poor PF at feeder level.

Analysis used: Optimal capacitor placement

PF

80%

90%

95%

MW

2298

2298

2298

MVA

2873

2553

2419

MVARS

(deficit)

1724

1113

755 new Mvars

(capacitors)

Potential savings

$M (see note)

611

968

$

$

42.2

66.9

Note: 265 MVAR of capacitor banks installed, reducing demand by 47 megawatts, valued at $18.3 million annually

% of deployement

10%

25%

40%

100%

MVARS

Cost

(@50$/kVAR)

96.8

242.0

387.3

968.2

$ 4.84

$ 12.10

$ 19.36

$ 48.41

Savings

$ 6.69

$ 16.71

$ 26.74

$ 66.86

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

15

Study case 2: VAR optimization

Problem: Good PF at peak but needed better management off-peak.

Analysis used: Volt Vars optimization (VVO)

Peak

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

16

Study Case 3: Voltage Optimization

Problem: Initial voltage profile showing little margin for optimization (see below)

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

17

Study Case 3: Voltage Optimization

We applied various mitigation solutions: phase balancing, cap banks and voltage regulators relocation and addition. Results after corrections:

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

18

Study Case 3: Voltage Optimization

1.06

1.05

1.04

1.03

1.02

1.01

1.00

0.99

0.98

0.97

0%

We looked at the global picture for potential:

Min and Max voltage vs load level

1

20% r i g n

M a

40% 60%

% of peak level

80% 100% 120%

Voltage (at MV) Lowest

Voltage (at MV) Highest

Load Values (max to min)

2

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

0% 20% 80% 40%

% of time

60% 100%

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

19

Study Case 3: Voltage Optimization

How does the margin translates in $$$?

Peak demand opportunity

Substation peak

Reduction/voltage margin

1%

2%

3%

4%

Potential capital cost saving @

22893 KW (based on July readings)

CVR efficiency factor (% saving vs % voltage reduction)

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

92

183

275

366

137

275

412

549

183

366

549

733

229

458

687

916

$ 500.00

/ kW

Reduction/voltage margin

1%

2%

3%

4%

CVR efficiency factor (% saving vs % voltage reduction)

0.4

$ 45,786

0.6

$ 68,679

0.8

$ 91,572

1.0

$ 114,465

$ 91,572

$ 137,358

$ 183,144

$

$

$

137,358

206,037

274,716

$

$

$

183,144

274,716

366,288

$

$

$

228,930

343,395

457,860

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

20

Study Case 3: Voltage Optimization

How does the margin translates in $$$?

Energy opportunity (month of July)

Total Energy at sub.

9497623 kWh (based on hourly July readings)

Reduction/voltage margin

1%

2%

3%

4%

Potential energy efficiency saving @

CVR efficiency factor (% saving vs % voltage reduction)

0.4

37990

0.6

56986

0.8

75981

1.0

94976

75981

113971

151962

113971

170957

227943

151962

227943

303924

189952

284929

379905

$ 0.04

/ kWh

Reduction/voltage margin

1%

2%

3%

4%

CVR efficiency factor (% saving vs % voltage reduction)

0.4

$ 1,520

$ 3,039

$ 4,559

$ 6,078

0.6

$

$

$

$

2,279

4,559

6,838

9,118

0.8

$

$

$

$

3,039

6,078

9,118

12,157

1.0

$

$

$

$

3,799

7,598

11,397

15,196

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

21

Remember:

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

22

Questions? ...I know they have some!

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

23

© 2013 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.

24