A “Short” history of the Juvenile Justice System

advertisement

A History of the Juvenile

Justice System

The Nutshell Version, Anyhow

Two Central Issues

1. Why should kids who commit crimes be treated any differently than adults?

• At what age does a kid cease to become a

“kid?”

2. If kids should be treated differently, how should they be treated?

Pre-Middle Ages

• Code of Hammurabi (2270 b.c.)

• Other Examples

– Roman civil and church law

– Ancient Jewish and Moslem laws

Middle Ages (500-1500ad)

• Roman criminal law codified in the “Twelve

Tables”

– Eventually, under the “Justinian Code”

• 0-7 Years = not criminally responsible

• 7-12/14 = know right from wrong?

• >12/14 = adult

• English common law emerges (1000-1100ad)

– Early common law = “too young for punishment”

– By 1500s, common law adopts scheme similar to

Justinian code

Middle Ages II

• English Common Law

– 0 to 7 = not criminally responsible

– 7-14 = burden on state to demonstrate that the child:

• Formed criminal intent

• Understood consequences of their actions

• Knew right from wrong

• Concept of Parens Patriae develops

– Civil law, King as “parent of country”

England 1500-1700

• Statute of Artificers (1562) and Poor Laws

(1602)

– Children of paupers apprenticed

• Punishment of criminal children still similar to adults

– Corporal/public, banishment, galley slavery

• Bridewell Workhouse (London, 1557)

– Precursor to prisons, idea = “reform through labor”

– Mostly for “idle”/”disorderly”

Colonial America

• Until the late 1700s  English Common

Law

– Prison uncommon, many children found

“innocent” to spare them corporal punishment

U.S. 1775-1825

1. The Industrial Revolution

2. The Birth of the Penitentiary

3.

“Gentleman Reformers”

Result of these trends: Houses of Refuge

– Ex Parte Crouse (1839)

And later, “Industrial” and “Reform” schools

– People ex rel. O’Connell V. Turner (1870)

The “Child Saving Movement”

• Child Savers disgruntled with “child prisons”

– Deep mistrust of “the city” and immigrants

• Advocated rural “Cottage Style” housing

• Helped to “place out” city kids to farm families

Progressive Era (1900-1930)

• The Progressives

– Optimists + Faith in Government

• General = sanitation, poverty, unsafe labor…

• Juveniles = compulsory education, helped shape juvenile justice system

The Juvenile Court Movement

• First Juvenile Court in Illinois (1899)

– Quasi-civil nature of court

• Parens Patriae = act in best interest of child using noncriminal procedures

• No “special wrong” necessary

– Characteristics

• Informal, closed proceedings with sealed records

• Medical model of “diagnosing” social ills

• Age = 15 years and younger

• Probation Officers to investigate and rehabilitate

J.C. Spreads (1900-1950)

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

1899 1905 1909 1927 1950

Innovation and Stability

• Juvenile Courts Spread, but differences emerged

– Some states require procedures similar to criminal court, others courts grant judge complete discretion to “follow conscience”

• Discretion/Informality becomes key issue

– Good?

– Bad?

• By the 1950s, many juvenile courts are “bureaucratic and burdened”

Winds of Change 1960-1975

• Social Context of this Period Crucial

– Viet Nam, Kent State, Attica, Watergate…

– Increase in crime, divorce, single parents…

– Youth flaunting morals of prior generation

• Ideological Responses

– Conservatives?

– Liberals/Progressives?

Strange Bedfellows

• Conservatives and Liberals largely agree on policy

Issues

– In both adult and juvenile system, discretion should be limited

– Juveniles should be granted due process rights

• Differences?

– Conservatives  treat juveniles more like adults, punishment works

– Liberals  most juveniles should be diverted from the system, short sentences for those that aren’t

Constitutional Domestication

• Kent vs. United States (1961)

• In Re Gault (1967)

• In Re Winship (1970)

• Breed v. Jones (1975)

• Justice Stewarts Dissent Opinion in Gault

From Cox et. al (Your Book)

• “Legalists”

• “Case Workers” (Social Work)

OJJDP and DSO

• 1967 President Johnson’s “Commission on Law

Enforcement and Administration of Justice.”

• 1974 Congress enacts “Juveniel Justice and

Delinquency Prevention Act.”

– Creation of OJJDP

– Decriminalization, Deinstitutionalization, elimination of court authority over status offenders

• Mass. “deinstitutionalization” experiment

Getting “Tough” 1980-2000

• Backlash against diversion, labeling theory

– Political Rhetoric “get tough on juveniles”

– National “war on drugs”

– 1984 National Advisory Committee for

Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention

How have we gotten “tough?”

• Legislative Policy

– Juvenile Wavier, Statutory Exclusion

– Lower upper age limit of jurisdiction

– Sentencing (Blended, mandatory minimum)

– Confidentiality, records in adult courts

• Types of Punishment

– Boot Camps, ISP, Electronic Monitoring

Where is policy now

• Crime in general is not “high profile” issue

• OJJDP 1993 Comprehensive Strategy

• Barry Feld’s “Criminological triage”

Research For Debates and

Papers

• I Expect evidence from academic sources

– Journal articles, academic books

• Searching for articles/books

– Get references from books or articles

– Government reports (OJJDP, NCJRS…)

– Search

• Criminal Justice Abstracts

• Sage journals search (full text)

• Journal of Crime and Delinquency (full text)

Download