Welcome to the e-Learning course on The Risk

advertisement

Early PforR experience –

Acronyms

Exchanging views and emerging lessons

CGD, Washington DC, November 27, 2012

Why did the Bank develop the PforR?

Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully met through existing instruments; it enhances development effectiveness of client programs and of development assistance

Focus on Results – PforR places attention on results through more direct linkage of funding to the achievement of verifiable results and performance actions

Institutional and Capacity Building – By using program institutions and systems, PforR will strengthen institutions/capacity of the whole program

Acronyms

Enhanced Partnerships – PforR provides an opportunity to improve coordination among development partners in government programs

2

How does PforR complement the Bank’s menu of instruments?

Project Lending

(IL)

Implementation Mechanism

Bank IL rules and procedures

Funds for specific expenditures

Policy Lending

(DPL)

Country policy processes

Funds for nonearmarked general budget support

Program Lending

(PforR)

Program systems expenditure program

Where are we?

• The five first operations were approved by the Board totaling $881 million of Bank financing supporting a total of

$2,28 billion of government programs

• An additional 15 operations are in the pipeline for approval by July, 2013

• Operations approved to date are in five different regions in a range of country typologies (from fragile states to MICs)

• The sectoral breakdown is also diverse with operations in transport, human /social development, urban and so forth.

Acronyms

4

PforR Pipeline Operations

Pakistan

Nepal

Morocco

Mauritania

Ethiopia

Uganda

Brazil

Kenya

Tanzania

Uruguay

India

Mozambique

Bangladesh

Vietnam

5

The five approved Operations

Operation

Morocco – National

Initiative for Human

Development (Phase II)

Nepal – Results-Based

Bridges Improvement and Maintenance

Tanzania – Urban Local

Government

Strengthening Program

Uruguay – Road

Infrastructure Program for Results

Sector

Social

Development

Transport

Urban

Examples of selected DLIs

• % girls who reside in the educational dormitories graduating to the next grade

• % population provided with access to improved water supply in targeted rural communes by the Program

Completion of major maintenance of bridges and of building/improvements to new bridges on national network

Local govts. with strengthened institutional performance achieving: (i) Program minimum conditions; and (ii) performance score (annual assessment)

Vietnam – Results-Based

Rural Water and

Sanitation

Water and

Sanitation

Transport connections from systems that are sustainable: and (ii) benefiting from commune-wide sanitation in new communes

Number of km of the National Road Network: (i) rehabilitated with minimum quality level; and (ii) maintained through performance-based contracts

Early feedback

‘ shift in the dialogue with government counterparts ’

‘extremely welcome’

‘game changer’

‘PforR proves to be

‘we appreciate the reduced transaction processes’ useful in different countries and sectors’

‘ more interagency

‘deeper focus on results’ dialogue between government agencies ’

…but, risk of falling short of potential?

• Concerns about the exclusions

Acronyms

• Clients voice concerns about intrusive nature of some aspects especially on right to investigate

7

7

Early findings

• DLIs range from outcomes to outputs, processes, and actions depending on the specific nature of the program e.g. Morocco Communities: percentage of girls who reside in the educational dormitories graduating to the next grade

Uruguay Transport: cumulative number of kilometers of the Uruguay

National Road Network rehabilitated at a minimum quality level

Vietnam Water and Sanitation: disclosed provincial annual plan and progress report for each province

• Verification arrangements haven been agreed that are acceptable to the Bank and ensure credible verification

Tanzania Local Govt.: government-contracted reputable firm with TORs satisfactory to the Bank

8

Early findings (cont’d)

• In general, the assessments have allowed to open good dialogue about systems, their performance and how best to improve that e.g. Tanzania Local Govt.: in the expenditures area, the technical assessment identified partial budget transfers from central to local governments as a cause for under-performance, and made full transfer a condition of DLI disbursement

Uruguay Transport: in the fiduciary area, quantitative indicators were defined to measure the performance of the Uruguay's Road Administration procurement system, and a study to be undertaken to identify the key obstacles to shorter bids evaluation periods, and propose related measures

• Grievance/complaint mechanisms have been identified or developed, taking into account the specific nature of the program

Acronyms e.g. Tanzania Local Govt.: mechanism to be put in place by local governments as a Minimum Access Condition to access infrastructure financing

Morocco Communities: existing government program mechanisms with specific improvement

9

Early findings (cont’d)

• Environmental and social impacts are limited

• Category A type activities are not part of the Program scope e.g. Nepal Bridges: 2% of the bridges were excluded given their potential effects on environmentally sensitive areas

• PforR Programs are also expected to have positive effects e.g. reduce risk of flooding and soil erosion (e.g. Tanzania Local Govt.), reduced transportation cost (e.g. Uruguay Transport) increased percentage of the population provided with access to improved water supply in targeted rural communes (e.g. Morocco Communities)

• Priority Capacity building measures have been included in

Programs, linked to specific DLIs and/or included in the PforR operation’s Program Action Plan

Acronyms e.g. Nepal Bridges: DLI #4 Strengthened performance management in bridge sector (percent works complete on schedule)

Morocco INDH2: DLI #7 Percentage of provinces and prefectorates in the

Program Area which have put in place a plan of action to address audit recommendations

10

Summing up

• The PforR instrument has been adapted to varying country and sector contexts

• Each operation reflects the nature of the individual Programs in which they operate

• Program systems have been assessed as respecting policy requirements, and as being supportive of Program results with improvements as necessary

• Overall, risks to results have been assessed to be manageable

Acronyms

• Overall engagement and discussions on results and DLIs have fundamentally changed the dialogue between Clients and the Bank

11

Exchange of views and lessons - what’s next?

• Want to continue the conversations

• Keep the spirit of a learning approach to the instrument

• Events include

• Internal/external peer learning events (e.g. on results)

• 2013 Spring/Annual Meetings events

• Exchange of views and lessons by email to OPCSPforR@worldbank.org

Acronyms

12

For more information, please visit

http://www.worldbank.org/ProgramforResults

Acronyms

Download