***Embargoed until 12:01 a.m. Central time Sunday, Aug. 25***
Mainbar condensed version: 980 words
Sidebar 1 (appears below): 280 words
Sidebar 2 (appears below): 170 words
New school standards under attack
Wisconsin and other states are second-guessing Common Core
By Nora G. Hertel
Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
As Wisconsin schools begin a new year, many are tailoring their lessons around an increasingly
controversial set of voluntary math and English standards for kindergarten through 12th grade.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative, which sets new and often more rigorous goals for
what the nation’s students should be learning at each grade level, is drawing flak from all sides,
from Tea Party activists to educators.
“It’s kind of a monstrosity that’s spreading across the country without much input from the town
boards, school boards,” said Kim Simac of the Northwoods Patriots, a Tea Party affiliate in
Eagle River.
Meanwhile, the Milwaukee-based nonprofit publisher Rethinking Schools has chided,
“Unfortunately, there's been too little honest conversation and too little democracy in the
development of the Common Core.”
Meant to prepare students for colleges and careers, the Common Core standards list specific
expectations for academic mastery. For instance, students should recognize equivalent fractions
by fourth grade and use precise vocabulary when writing about complex topics in grades nine
and 10.
The standards also call on teachers to help students develop critical thinking and analysis skills,
said Emilie Amundson, Common Core State Standards team director for the state Department of
Public Instruction (DPI).
“For Wisconsin as a state, this is a huge shift. Our (previous) standards … were so incredibly
general,” Amundson said.
Many educators around Wisconsin began implementing the standards when they were adopted
by State Superintendent Tony Evers in 2010. But this year, the standards will be in place in
virtually every public school in the state, and some private schools.
Tim Schell, director of curriculum and instruction for the Waunakee School District, said the
transition to Common Core will be hard for elementary level teachers, who must overhaul both
their math and literacy curricula.
“You’re beginning to see some of the actual impact, and these are big changes,” Schell said.
“These are not easy changes.”
In May the state Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee amended the state budget to require a
review of the standards and a study of the costs associated with them. It called for a series of
public hearings on Common Core, which DPI plans to hold, and asked for a Legislative Council
study committee to look into the issue.
The Legislative Fiscal Bureau is expected to release its report soon on the cost of implementing
Common Core, as well as the cost to halt implementation.
“DPI began to implement Common Core in 2010 without any public input or legislative action,”
state Rep. Dean Knudson, R-Hudson, said in a statement. “My hope is that after public input is
had and the study received by the Legislature, we can more precisely assess which standards are
best for our state’s schools.”
Nationally, Republicans are split on whether the Common Core is a good idea. Walker was an
early supporter of the standards, but last week his office declined to comment.
‘Orwellian control’
The National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers developed
the standards with input from a panel of experts and funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation.
Currently, 45 states and the District of Columbia have adopted the new standards. Minnesota has
embraced the standards for English but not math.
But in some states, including Wisconsin, these standards are under fire.
In April, Indiana passed a law calling for an evaluation of the standards and their costs, while
stalling their implementation. Michigan, in its new state budget, prohibits spending state money
on Common Core.
And several states, including Georgia and Oklahoma, have withdrawn from one of the groups
developing Common Core-aligned standardized tests.
In Wisconsin, lawmakers held a special legislative hearing in May on the new standards before
an overflow crowd. Several speakers, including representatives from two Wisconsin school
districts, the DPI, and the right-leaning Fordham Institute, testified in favor of the standards.
Committee members also heard from critics who painted Common Core as an exercise in federal
overreach.
Joy Pullmann, a research fellow at the Heartland Institute -- a conservative think tank that weighs
in on education, health care and promotes skepticism that climate change is manmade -- called
the standards “unproven education theories, embedded in an Orwellian control system in which
we have had no voice.”
The standards have been championed by Arne Duncan, President Barack Obama’s education
secretary. And the administration offered Race to the Top grant money and No Child Left
Behind waivers to some states that got on board.
Indeed, some critics of Common Core have dubbed it ObamaCore.
The Republican National Committee has condemned the standards as “an inappropriate
overreach to standardize and control the education of our children.” It ripped “the collection of
personal student data for any non-educational purpose without prior written consent.”
There is no mention in the standards about a national database for student information, and
defenders of the initiative say there is no such intent.
“Common Core itself does not require any data collection,” said Jennifer Kammerud, legislative
liaison for DPI, at the May hearing. She added that state and federal law already require some
data gathering. However, Assistant State Superintendent Kurt Kiefer told the committee that data
shared with the federal government cannot be traced to individual students.
Mike Bormett, DPI policy and budget director, said these new tests will cost the state an
additional $8.3 million next year. The tests are more costly than previous assessments because
more grades will be taking the tests, they are more complicated and they require expensive
software.
DPI team director Amundson also notes that the new testing will almost certainly result in lower
scores. “These are higher standards,” Amundson said. “It’ll be a harder test.”
State Rep. Mandy Wright, D-Wausau, supports the standards. A former middle and high school
English teacher, Wright sees them as a way to bring continuity across classrooms on what
students are taught.
“People have really developed their niche and what works for them as teachers,” she said. “We
needed something like this to bring it all together, to pull together all those different pieces.”
The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org)
collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and
the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the
views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.
Sidebar 1
Too easy or too tough?
Some critics of the new Common Core standards embraced by Wisconsin schools feel they set
the bar for students too high too early.
Tina Hollenbeck, a former classroom teacher and homeschooler in Green Bay, believes the
standards require abstract thinking that’s too hard for children in kindergarten and first grade.
“That would be a huge stress that’s coming for these kids.”
Tuyet Cullen, an eighth grade math teacher in Madison, notes that Common Core has children
multiplying fractions in fourth or fifth grade. Before, this skill was not usually taken up until
sixth grade.
“Are their brains ready for that concept?” Cullen asked. “If (the standards) aren’t
developmentally appropriate, they’re going to be too hard.”
Others argue that the standards are too easy.
“I could provide you with many sets of standards that are more rigorous than the Common Core,”
Karen Schroeder of the conservative group Advocates for Academic Freedom, told state
lawmakers in May.
And University of Arkansas Professor Emerita Sandra Stotsky, who served as an English expert
on a national committee that reviewed Common Core, has asserted that the math standards will
leave American students “about two years behind their peers in high-achieving countries.” She
said the new benchmarks are “not going to be preparing American students for authentic collegelevel work in any subject.”
Madison school Superintendent Jennifer Cheatham agrees questions may be raised about “the
developmental readiness of students in the primary grades.” But she strongly supports the
standards and thinks school districts will be able to make appropriate adjustments.
“The standards aren’t perfect. I don’t think any set of standards ever are,” Cheatham said. “But
they are a dramatic improvement from the standards that we had previously.”
-- Nora G. Hertel
Sidebar 2
What Common Core requires
Common Core sets a series of benchmarks for what K-12 students should know and when they
should know it. In some cases the standards are similar to those previously used in Wisconsin,
which set benchmarks for just fourth, eighth and 12th grades. But some of the new standards are
more demanding. Here are some examples.
Kindergarten, math: “Count to 100 by ones and by tens. … Write numbers from zero to 20.”
(The prior state standards set no specific benchmarks for math in kindergarten.)
Fourth grade, writing: “Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using
effective technique, descriptive details and clear event sequences.”
Sixth grade, geometry: “Find the area of right triangles, other triangles, special quadrilaterals and
polygons … (to solve) real world and mathematical problems.”
Eighth grade, reading: “Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text,
including figurative and connotative meanings.”
Twelfth grade, writing: “Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description,
reflection and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events and/or characters.”