nicls

advertisement

Nebraska Informatics Center for the Life Sciences

MINI TRACt Session on Bioinformatics

April 20, 2005 Omaha, NE

Polymer Genomics

Alexander Kabanov

Drug Delivery

Transport of a drug, protein or

DNA to its critical site of action within the body at concentrations sufficient to produce the desired therapeutic effect.

Outline

 Effects of Synthetic Polymers on Gene

Expression during Gene Delivery

 Effects of Synthetic Polymers on Gene

Expression during Drug Delivery

Effects of Synthetic Polymers on Gene Expression during

Gene Delivery

Non-Viral Gene Delivery

Paradigm

Retrovirus Replication

(http://www.accessexcellence.org/AB/GG/retrovirus.html)

Architecture

Linear

Randomly

Branched

Polycation

Linear PEI

(Exgene 500)

Polyethyleneimine

Dendrimer

Graft/block copolymers

Dispersed

Networks

Polyamidoamine

(Superfect TM )

PEOb -PLL

P123g -PEI(2K)

Peptide-PEOg -PEI

PEOcross -PEI

Structure

H

3

C-CH

2

-NH-[CH

2

-CH

2

-NH] n

-CH

2

-CH

2

-NH

3

N

N

NH

PEI

N

N

N

NH

2

N

NH

2

R

O

N

H

N

O

OH

O

NH NH

2

O

N

PEI

O

NH NH

2

PPO

PEO

Pluronic P123

PEG

++

++

++

++

+

PEI

++

+

160 nm

PEO

Peptide

DNA/Polycation Complex

PPO

PEI 2 kDa

PEO

Pluronic P123

DNA

10000

1000

100

10

1

160 nm pCMV-luc, Cos-7 cells, optimized N/P ratio

Pluronic Block

Copolymers

HO CH

2

CH

2

O

EO n/2

CH

2

CHO

CH

3

PO m

CH

2

CH

2

O H n/2

EO

Pluronic F38 EO

40

PO

16

EO

40 m + n = 96

Pluronic P85 EO

26

PO

40

EO

26 m + n = 92

Pluronic F123 EO

19

PO

69

EO

19 m + n = 107

Hydrophobicity increases

Pluronic-Enhanced Gene

Expression in Muscle

HO CH

2

CH

2

O n/2

CH

2

CHO CH

2

CH

2

O H n/2

CH

3 m

SP1017:

Pluronic L61 and Pluronic F127 (1:8) wt.

Naked DNA DNA/SP1017 c57Bl/6

700000

600000

500000

400000

300000

200000

100000

0

*

CMC

0 0.001 0.01

0.05

0.1

1

SP1017 (% w/v)

Lemieux et al. (2000) Gene Therapy 8, 92

Enhanced Gene

Expression in Muscle

2400

2000

1600

1200

800

400

0

0

DNA alone

DNA + P85

10 20

Days

30 40

1800 x 18

DNA alone

DNA + P85 x 11

1200

600

0

5

 g 10

 g x 4

50

 g

Genotype Dependence of

Pluronic Effect

1500

1200

900

600

300

0

Balb/C naked DNA

DNA+P85(0.3%)

C57Bl/6 Athymic

Promoter-Selectivity of

Pluronic Effect

Enhanced Gene Expression in Stably Transfected Cells

10000

7500

(-) Pluronic

(+) Pluronic

10

*

5000

2500

3

*

Mouse fibroblasts NIH3T3 were stably transfected with luciferase gene by co-transfection with 5:1 ratio of gWIZluc and phCMV1

0

P85 L64

Effect Pluronic P85 on mRNA Levels in

Luc CMV -NIH3T3 Cells

Control L64 P85

Luc(230bp)

GAPDH (474bp) hsp68 (664bp)

4

3

2

1

0

9

8

7

6

5

HSP/GAPDH

Luc/GAPDH

* *

* *

Media P85

* *

* *

L64

Bacterial,

Viral infection

Stress Cytokines cytoplasm

IκB kinase P-Ikb

B-actin

0 2 5 min

IκB

NFκB

NF-

ATP

Active

κB

NFκB

ADP

I-

κB

P

NFκB

Ubiquitination and degradation of IκB by proteosomes

NFκB

Activation of genes

Nucleus

Conclusion

 Pluronic block copolymers can increase expression of genes that are already present in the cells through mechanism(s) other than enhanced DNA delivery

 The mechanism involves activation of transcription

 This effect is promoter selective and involves selected signaling pathways (NF-kB, p53).

Effects of Synthetic Polymers on Gene Expression during

Drug Delivery

Drug Delivery Concept

Drug incorporation into delivery “system”

+

Drug Polymer Delivery “system”

Drug release at the target site

Administer into body

+ Therapeutic effect

Pluronic Block

Copolymers

HO CH

2

CH

2

O

EO n/2

CH

2

CHO

CH

3

PO m

CH

2

CH

2

O H n/2

EO

Pluronic F38 EO

40

PO

16

EO

40 m + n = 96

Pluronic P85 EO

26

PO

40

EO

26 m + n = 92

Pluronic F123 EO

19

PO

69

EO

19 m + n = 107

Hydrophobicity increases

Micellar Nanocontainers

Solubilization

Drug hydrophilic hydrophobic

Micellization

Micelle

Block copolymer

A.V. Kabanov et. al FEBS Lett. 1989, 258, 343-345

MDR in Cancers Tumors

Drug

Pgp

MRP1

Nucleus

GSH/GST

Acidic vesicles

Bcl-2

 p53

Apoptosis

Inhibition of Pgp Efflux

System

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

Non resistant

LLC-PK1

Resistant

LLC-MDR1

LLC-PK1 LLC-

MDR1

Assay buffer

0.1% P85

Cells were exposed to

0.1 % P85 for 60 min.

Batrakova et al. (2001) JPET 296, 551

Pluronic Pgp

MRPs

BCRP

Drug

Mitochondria

ATP

GSH/GST

Acidic vesicles

BCL2, BCLXL

BAX, P53, APAF1, caspases 3, 9

Nucleus

Apoptosis

Kabanov et al. (2002) Adv. Drug Del. Rev ., 54, 759.

Sensitization of MDR

Tumors by Pluronic P85

100

80

Dnr/P85

SKVLB

Dnr

Dnr/P85

SKOV3

60

40 free Dnr

SKVLB

20

0

0.001

0.1

10

[Daunorubicin], mg/ml

Alakhov et al. (1996) Bioconjugate Chem. 7 , 209

Clinical Trials of Pluronic-

Doxorubicin (SP1049C)

• Phase I completed

• 26 patients in Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK

• MTD 70 mg/m 2

• Anti-tumor activity in some patients with advanced solid tumors

(Danson et al. 2004, Br. J. Cancer , 90: 2085)

• Phase II trial in progress

• Inoperable metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Technology Company

Prevention of MDR in

MCF7 Breast Carcinoma

Western blot

10000

Dox alone selects resistant cells

1000

100

Dox + P85 no resistance develops

10

1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Days

Stepwise increase of the drug concentration: n + 2n

Pgp

-actin

Selected and Parental

Breast Cancer Cells

MCF7 MCF7/Dox MCF7/-Dox-

P85

Human breast carcinoma cells, MCF7 were selected by exposure to increasing concentrations of Dox (MCF7/1000), or Dox/Pluronic P85 (MCF7/10P85)

Simultaneous visualization of F- and G-actin using F-actin –specific Oregon Green 488 phalloidin and G-actin –specific Texas Red deoxyribonuclease I.

Global (20K) Gene

Expression

MCF7 (cy3)

MCF7 (cy3)

MCF7/Dox vs. MCF7:

Upregulated 642 genes

Downregulated: 252 genes

MCF7/Dox-P85 vs. MCF7:

Upregulated 422 genes

Downregulated: 103 genes

MCF7 (cy3)

MCF7/P85 vs. MCF7:

Upregulated 94 genes

Downregulated: 22 genes

UNMC-Eppley Microarray Core Facility (Dr. D. Kelly)

Self-Organizing Map

(SOM) Analysis

UNMC Eppley Bioinformatics Shared Resource Drs. Sherman, Xiao)

Dox vs. Pluronic/Dox

Selected Cells

Multivariate Scatter Plot

UNMC Eppley Bioinformatics Shared Resource Drs. Sherman, Xiao)

Estrogen dependence

Respiration

Metallothioneins

Heat shock

MDR

Breast cancer resistance

MDR1 transcrition activation

Connective tissue growth

Metabolic resistance

Conclusion

Pluronic block copolymers alone are “genetically benign”

 When combined with a drug they can alter gene expression during selection of cancer cells

 They can prevent development of drug resistance for example MDR in breast tumors

 Some genes are altered with drug/polymer formulation that are not altered with drug alone

Polymer Genomics

Hypothesis

• Select polymers that alone are genetically benign when combined with

“biological agents” (low molecular mass drugs, antigens, DNA) can alter specific genomic responses to these agents.

• These polymers should have a “weak phenotypic effect” on cells, e.g. be membrane-active, such as water-soluble amphiphilic block copolymers and polyelectrolytes

• These polymers perhaps act by interfering with cell signaling mechanisms

Acknowledgement

UNMC:

Elena Batrakova

Zhihui Yan

Jian Zhu

Srikanth Sriadibhatla

Shu Li

Catherine Gebhart

David Kelley

Simon Sherman

Li Xiao

Supratek Pharma Inc.:

Valery Alakhov

Moscow state University

Dasha Alakhova o National Cancer Institute o National Science Foundation o Nebraska Research Initiative

Conclusion

 Pluronic displays selective activity towards cells expressing MDR1 gene

 MDR1 gene expression is a valuable marker to predict success of

Pluronic/drug formulation in cancer

Conclusion

 Pluronic alters the transcript levels expressed in cancer cells in response to chemotherapy and in particular abolishes development of MDR, which may be an additional benefit in cancer therapy

 Certain genes are altered with drug/Pluronic that are not affected with the drug alone

Download