Amberpoint - Center

advertisement
Gaining Control of Your SOA
Willie Kirkpatrick
VP EMEA
AmberPoint
Long Time Microsoft SOA Partner
Joint development, licensing, and distribution
Wide support of Microsoft’s SOA stack
Visual Studio
.NET variations
BizTalk
Visual Studio
System Center Ops Mgr
Native C# implementation of AmberPoint
Version of AmberPoint bundled with Visual Studio
Unive
Insurance Company – Netherlands
Business Problem
Site 1
Site 2
HTML Services
HTML Services
Business Services
Business Services
74
Services
177
Endpoints
The Netherlands changed to an “open
enrollment” model
Competitive market required direct
customer access to information and
enrollment
Targeted Health Insurance System first
Technical Approach
Exposing internal processes &
applications for internet use by
customers
Microsoft “Stack”
Legacy Services
Legacy Services
Visual Studio
.NET
SharePoint
Systems Center Ops Manager
Transformed Mainframe Applications
Redundant sites for High Availability
Unive
Insurance Company – Netherlands
Technical Problem
Complex, distributed transactions
(“SOA”) made it hard to manage
running applications
Difficult to:
Diagnose issues
Ensure high availability
Meet QOS requirements
Solution: AmberPoint
Business Results
With on-line, immediate cross checks
and data validation, over 60% of new
applications processed directly into
mainframe apps
Results
“If we hadn’t started using AmberPoint,
we would have stopped using SOA.” –
Bob Alberts, Project Director
Vital Forsikring
Largest Life & Pensions company in Norway
Business Problem
Increasingly competitive market driving
need to reduce costs and increase
agility.
Portal
Files
Technical Approach
BizTalk
BizTalk
30+
Services
60+
Endpoints
Business Services
Business Services
Migration from Mainframe to SOA
overtime
Microsoft “Stack”
.NET 2.0
BizTalk Server 2006
Systems Center Ops Manager
Windows 2003 64bit
Benefits
Lower mean time to repair
Ability to provide reliable, secure selfservice application, including a pensions
portal for smaller organizations
Keys to Successful Runtime Governance of
SOA Applications
Visibility – Knowing What’s Out There and What’s Going On…
Control – Putting Policies into Action…
Ensuring Integrity – Ensuring Changes Don’t Impact the Whole
Application Environment…
Handle the entire infrastructure
Do it all automatically
Reduces risks and costs
Automation is the single most important thing that makes SOA scaleable
SOA Governance
Design Time Gov.
Runtime Gov.
Dev & QA Tools
Lifecycle Management
Approval Processes
Service Registry
Policy Requirements
Service Level Mgmt
Transaction Monitoring
Auditing / Logging
Security
Policy Enforcement
SOA Infrastructure
App Servers
Enterprise Service Bus
Appliances
Legacy Systems
Process Management
Databases
Closed Loop SOA Governance
Intended
Design
Design Time Gov.
Runtime Gov.
Dev & QA Tools
Lifecycle Management
Approval Processes
Service Registry
Policy Requirements
Service Level Mgmt
Transaction Monitoring
Auditing / Logging
Security
Policy Enforcement
SOA Infrastructure
App Servers
Enterprise Service Bus
Appliances
Legacy Systems
Process Management
Databases
Running
Reality
?
?
Closed Loop SOA Governance
Intended
Design
Design Time Gov.
Runtime Gov.
Visual Studio
Team System
Repository
SOA Infrastructure
.NET / Windows Communication Foundation
BizTalk
SharePoint
SQL Server
Etc.
Running
Reality
?
?
Closed Loop SOA Governance
Intended
Design
Design Time Gov.
Runtime Gov.
Running
Reality
?
SOA Infrastructure
?
Automatic End-to-End Discovery
Dynamic Discovery of your SOA environment…
Dependencies
Services & Consumers
Transaction Flow
Runtime Policies & Metadata
…across Heterogeneous Infrastructure
Containers
Messaging
Repositories
ESBs
Appliances
Home-grown
Databases
Registries / Repositories
Service
Registries
Design Information
Running Environment
No application, message or header modifications
Automatically feeds Design Time Governance
Ensures Complete Accounting of Your SOA Environment
AmberPoint SOA Explorer
Real-time view of overall environment and status
Table View
Quick filters to rapidly isolate
areas of interest
Graphical View
Transaction flow
Recent additions
Problem areas
Specific application groups
“Rogue” services
Filters
Take action
Drill Down
Place under management
Apply missing policies
Drill down into detail
Sortable, printable, exportable
information
End-to-End Transaction Monitoring & Diagnosis
From Clients, through Infrastructure, Applications, and Endpoints
Drill into Transaction
Content & Context
Performance
Business
Transactions
and
Process Flow
- Exception context
- Response times
Follows transactions through SOA
and non-SOA components:
eCommerce
System
ESB‘s
Java and .NET Applications
Databases
Order
Detects problems with business flows:
Credit
Check
Warehouse
Order Management
Shipping Partner
Performance issues
Missing or stalled steps
Failures
Real-time Monitoring of Business Transactions
Probe applications for inconsistencies
Expected Delivery
Disconnect Alert
Check transaction progress and correctness
Does not need to be synchronous or see
every step
Service Level Management
SLA enforcement for transactions, groups, users, and services
Transaction-level
SLA’s
User-level
SLA’s
Historical
Reporting
Multiple
Objectives
per
Agreement
Service
Level
Violations
Enforces agreements based on business criteria
“Gold” users, Accounting systems at the end of quarter, etc.
Flexible calendars, scheduled downtimes, fixed and sliding time windows
Preventative and corrective actions
Take Preventative / Mitigating Action
A Throttling Example
Performance
3 against objectives
1 Service Level Agreement
Service Level Objective (SLO)
For Platinum customers:
• Ave. Response time per hour < 6 sec
• Warning threshold <= 4 sec
- Action: Throttle non-Platinum users
2
Usage segmented – e.g.
by Platinum, Gold, Silver
Gold
Take Preventative / Mitigating Action
A Throttling Example
Performance
3 against objectives
1 Service Level Agreement
5
Service Level Objective (SLO)
For Platinum customers:
• Ave. Response time per hour < 6 sec
• Warning threshold <= 4 sec
- Action: Throttle non-Platinum users
2
Usage segmented – e.g.
by Platinum, Gold, Silver
Stabilized
response times
Gold
Automatically triggers
throttling before
4
compliance failure
Throttling Policy
Closed Loop SOA Governance
Intended
Design
Design Time Gov.
Approved Services
Intended reuse
QOS requirements
Policy requirements
Runtime Gov.
Discovered Services &
Dependencies
Transaction Monitoring
Performance metrics
Policy enforcement
Security
Throttling
Version transparency
Users
Authorized
Unauthorized attempts
Policy additions
Discovered policies
Operational additions
Running
Reality
?
?
Policy-based Approach to Runtime Governance
Enforced across the infrastructure
Pre-built library of most commonly
used runtime policies










Instrumentation
Version management
Service level agreements
Exception handling
Content-based Policies
Authentication – certificates,
credentials, SAML, etc
Authorization
Censorship
Credential Mapping
Crypto – Signatures &
Encryption
User-extensible
 Throttling
 Quality of Service
 Performance
 Availability
 Throughput
 Failover
 Load balancing
 Validation
Automated Policy Provisioning
Select policy
Policy enforcement across
the infrastructure
Configure
Service
Metadata
Set policy criteria
Combing AmberPoint + BizTalk creates a SOA Grid
with a clean separation of responsibilities
Managed
Endpoints
MEP
MEP
MEP
MEP
MEP
Virtual
Service
Provider
MEP
MEP
VSP
Microsoft BizTalk
VSP
MEP
MEP
MEP
MEP
VSP
Controls Service-to-Service Interactions
Controls Serviceto-Endpoint
Interactions
MEP
Resource Management
• Discovery / Registration
• End-to-end Visibility
• Measurement
• Message Distribution/Utilization
• Availability
• Access Control
VSP
Orchestration
Protocol Mediation
Message Routing
Content Transformation
VSP
MEP
MEP
MEP
Runtime Governance of Virtual Service Providers
Balanced Service Provider
Qualities:
• Scalability
• Performance
• Capacity
VSP
LB
MEP
MEP
MEP
VSP
VT
v1
MEP
v2
VSP
LB FO
MEP
MEP
vn
Benefits:
• Agile
• Controlled Access
• Deprecation
Benefits:
• Highly Available
• Fault Tolerant
Secure Service Provider
Qualities:
• Security
• Integrity
• Confidentiality
VSP
Qualities:
• Version Transparency
• Flexibility
MEP
Qualities:
• Reliability
• Availability
MEP
Benefits:
• Balanced
• Distributed
• Manageable
Evolving Service Provider
MEP
Resilient Service Provider
MEP
MEP
MEP
Benefits:
• Tamper Resistant
• Private
• Controlled Access
AmberPoint SOA Runtime Governance
Mark Munro
Senior Sales Engineering
Northern Europe - AmberPoint
In an ESB Scenario
Service-Oriented Infrastructure
Enterprise Service Bus
Native
Orchestration
Native
ESB Core Engine
CIM
Standard Service
Consumer
SOAP
Transformation
Routing
Exception Management
B2B Gateway
Provisioning Framework
Service Registry
Service Management
Legend:
CIM Consumer Integration Module
SIM Service Integration Module
Security
Supported Service
Provider
Adaptation
Adaptation
Supported Service
Consumer
SOAP
SIM
Standard Service
Provider
MedicAlert
Health Care Services
Personal health records for 4,000,000 world-wide members.
Key Requirements:
•
Consumer Client
(GUPTA on USB Key)
ChillKat
(String Encryption)
Public Internet
•
IP*Works!
(SOAP)
Firewall
MS NLB (VIP)
XWall
eHealthKey
Send or
Custom Actions
Chosen Solution:
AmberPoint Agent
(.NET)
AmberPoint
IIS
Windows 2003
Ensure high QoS requirements for access to
MedicAlert services – critical health implications
Ensure ‘last-mile’ security for sensitive & private
patient information
LDAP
Visibility into service usage and performance bottlenecks
Monitor impact of security & management policies on
their SOA
Version transparency – different eHealthKey versions
Desktop Applications
(future)
MS NLB (VIP)
MS NLB (VIP)
AmberPoint Agent
(.NET)
AmberPoint Agent
(.NET)
Web Service
(.NET)
Web Service
(.NET)
IIS
IIS
Windows 2003
BizTalk
Windows 2003
Microsoft .NET and BizTalk
Orchestration & Mediation
Results:
•
“Can usually have a running prototype assembled
faster than the marketing guys can write up their
requirements.” – Jorge Mercado, CTO
Closed Loop SOA Governance
Intended
Design
Design Time Gov.
Approved Services
Intended reuse
QOS requirements
Policy requirements
Runtime Gov.
Discovered Services &
Dependencies
Transaction Monitoring
Performance metrics
Policy enforcement
Security
Throttling
Version transparency
Users
Authorized
Unauthorized attempts
Policy additions
Discovered policies
Operational additions
Running
Reality
?
?
Download