EU course on Environmental Exposure Scenarios in Risk Assessment Assessment of environmental risks of biocides focus on emission scenarios ER 1 EU Regulations and Directives new chemicals existing chemicals pesticides biocides veterinary drugs feed additives food additives cosmetics packaging material r EC Directive 67/548/EEC EC Council Reg. 793/93 EC Directives 91/414/EEC EC Directive 98/8/EEC EC Regulation 2377/90 EC Directive 70/524/EEC 89/107/EEC SCP/803/90 EC Directive CS/PM/1025 Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 2 Elements of ‘Chemicals Control’ • Data collection and exchange of information • Classification and labelling • Risk assessment • Risk management (a.o. authorisation) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 3 The EU Biocidal Products Directive (1998) Why ? : Risk Management ! Whereas 1: ‘.. 1993 .. Council .. need for risk management of nonagricultural pesticides ..’ How ? (1): Authorisation procedure Whereas 4: ‘.. rules for placing on the market .. taking as a condition a high level of protection for humans, animals and the environment ..’ How ? (2): Risk Assessment Whereas 7, 8, 9, 11; Article 5; Annex VI TGDs: data requirements, risk assessment of active substances, ... r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 4 Environmental Risk Assessment: Basic Framework Data evaluation Exposure assessment Data set Effects assessment Emissions TGD Single species toxicity data Distribution EUSES Extrapolation PNEC PEC Risk characterization r PEC/PNEC Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 5 PRODUCTION Life cycle FORMULATION INDUSTRIAL USE PRIVATE USE Processing In product aid In product Processing aid SERVICE LIFE WASTE DISPOSAL r - Incineration - Landfilling - Recovery Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 6 Local emission and distribution routes Air Deposition Local emissions Grassland Agricultural soil Leaching Groundwater STP Dilution Surface water Sedimentation r Sediment Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 7 Indicative food chains PREDATORS SOIL POREWATER earthworm SURFACE WATER fish r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 8 Exposure assessment (results) Protection target PEC __________________________________________ micro-organisms STP effluent aquatic organisms surface water terrestrial organisms agricultural soil sediment organisms sediment predators fish or earthworms __________________________________________ r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 9 Effects assessment • laboratory testing (single species; standardised test) • various trophic levels + algae r + crustacea fish Aquatic ecosystem ? Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 10 PNEC derivation (water) Data Assessment factor Short-term L(E)C50 from each of three trophic levels of the base-set (fish, daphnia, algae) 1000 One long-term NOEC (either fish or Daphnia) 100 Two long-term NOECs from species representing two trophic levels (fish and/or Daphnia and/or algae) 50 Long-term NOECs from at least three species representing three trophic levels (normally fish, Dapnia, algae) 10 Field data or model ecosystems r case by case Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 11 EU TGD: importance of emission estimation • The TGDs were to be revised, and to also incorporate aspects which are specific for risk assessment of biocides • For biocides, the addition of specific emission and exposure scenarios had a high priority (Biocides TM, 1999) why ? – uses are the most prominent difference with other chemicals – emission has most significant influence on the final outcome of risk assessment r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 12 Experience of initial vs. refined RAs Uncertainty Factor __________________________________________ PNEC ± 10 emission rates 10 - > 1000 STP emission estimation < 10 biodegradation in surface water < 10 exposure assessment PEC 10 - > 10,000 __________________________________________ r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 13 Emission Sce n ari o s r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 14 Definition of ESD • An Environmental Emission Scenario Document is: “A set of conditions about sources, pathways, production processes and use patterns that quantify the emissions (or releases) of a chemical from production, formulation, processing, private use (or use in the household) and recovery/disposal into water, air and solid waste” (OECD 2000) • In general, an ESD should cover all aspects of the life-cycle. An ESD may cover only some parts of the life-cycle, if remaining parts are not relevant or covered by another ESD. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 15 Life Cycle & Risk Assessment New & Existing Substances PRODUCTION FORMULATION APPLICATION Local & Regional Scale r Biocidal Products Directive SERVICE LIFE WASTE Local Scale Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 16 Local scale (1 point source for each life cycle stage) Next stage of life cycle AIR 100 m Process Wastewater STP SOIL r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 17 Regional scale (all sources all stages of l.c.) I I II I Production PFI I I Formulation F Industrial use I I I I F I I P r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 18 Factors of Importance Process • Industrial category • Function of substances • Quantity of product • Content in product • Emission factor(s) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 19 Concept of Emission Estimation Elements: • Description of the industry or use area (‘process’) • Description of the types of substances used and their function in the industry area • Identification of points of release and emission factors • Information on the scale/size of operations • Information on emission control measures • Instruction on how to use the information in ESD and examples of calculations r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 20 Emission Scenario 1: Tonnage of Substance INPUT: Q Tonnage (tonnes.yr-1) Fms Fraction of the main source (-) EF Emission factor (-) Tem Number of emission days (d.yr-1) Emission = Q * Fms * EF / Tem * 10-3 (kg.d-1) Main Source No. of days Water Tonnage r Emission factors Soil Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel Air Waste 21 Emission Scenario 2: Scale of Process INPUT: Qp Tonnage of product (tonnes.d-1) Qs Quantity of substance (kg.tonne-1 product) EF Emission factor (-) Emission = Qp * Qs * EF (kg.d-1) Emission Factor r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 22 Emission Scenario 3: Average consumption INPUT: Qi Consumption per inhabitant (l.d-1) Cs Content of the substance in product (kg.l-1) Fpc Fraction of product with substance (-) EF Emission factor (-) Ni Number of inhabitants (-) Emission = Qi * Ni * Fpc * Cs * EF (kg.d-1) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 23 New & Existing substances Biocides A Biocide is a new or existing substance but a new or existing substance is not (always) a biocide A Biocide has a specific function : • Disinfectant • Preservative • Insecticide, acaricide, avicide, piscicide, . . . r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 24 Biocides (Use Category 39) Biocidal Products Directive 98/8/EG Annex V 23 biocidal product types r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 25 EU Biocidal Products Directive 23 Product Types divided over 4 Groups: I DISINFECTANTS & GENERAL BIOCIDES II PRESERVATIVES III PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS IV OTHER BIOCIDES r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 26 I DISINFECTANTS & GENERAL BIOCIDES 1 Human hygiene biocidal products 2 Private & public-health area disinfectants and other biocidal products 3 Veterinary hygiene biocidal products 4 Food and feeding area disinfectants 5 Drinking water disinfectants r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 27 II 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PRESERVATIVES In-can preservatives Film preservatives Wood preservatives Fibre, leather, rubber and polymerised materials preservatives Masonry preservatives Preservatives for liquid cooling and processing systems Slimicides Metalworking-fluid preservatives r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 28 III PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS 14 15 16 17 18 Rodenticides Avicides Molluscicides Piscicides Insecticides, acaricides & products to control other arthropod species 19 Repellents and attractants r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 29 IV OTHER BIOCIDES 20 Preservatives for food or feedstocks 21 Antifouling products 22 Embalming and taxidermist fluids 23 Control of other vertabrates r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 30 Example 1 Pt 1 : Human Hygiene Biocidal Products PRODUCTION For example: FORMULATION • Deodorants, antiperspirants • Anti-dandruff shampoo • Skin application • Antimicrobial soap Etc. • Short term r • Bathing PRIVATE USE SERVICE LIFE WASTE Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 31 Example 1 Pt 1 : Human Hygiene Biocidal Products Emission Scenarios of New & Existing Substances a) Tonnage b) Average consumption per inhabitant r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 32 Example 2 Pt 3 : Veterinary Hygiene Biocidal Products 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 r Disinfection of animal housing Disinfection of footwear and animals’feet Disinfection of milk extraction systems Disinfection of means of transport Disinfection of hatcheries Disinfection of fishfarms Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 33 Example 2 Disinfection of animal housing PRODUCTION FORMULATION APPLICATION “ ” SERVICE LIFE “ WASTE r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel ” 34 Example 2 Disinfection of animal housing Time No. of cows Maximum per ha N / P2O5 r Moment of manuring Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 35 The EUBEES projects • In 1999, a number of EU Member States, the European Chemicals Bureau and the European chemical industry (CEFIC), and supported by the European Commission, set up the EUBEES working group to develop environmental emission scenarios for environmental risk assessment of biocides in the framework of the Biocidal Products Directive. EUBEES • EUBEES 1 project: January 2000 until June 2001 • EUBEES 2 project: January 2002 until November 2003 r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 36 EUBEES 1: Results (1) • Report ‘Development of emission scenario documents for 23 product groups of the EU biocidal products directive 98/8/EG’, INFU/UBA, D. • ‘Emission scenario document for product type 2: private and public health area disinfectants and other biocidal products (sanitary and medical sector)’, RIVM, NL. • ‘Emission scenario document for biocides used in paper coating and finishing (product type 6,7&9)’, INERIS, F. • ‘Emission scenario document for biocides used as preservatives in the leather industry (product type 9)’, INERIS, F. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 37 EUBEES 1: Results (2) • ‘Emission scenario document for biocides used as preservatives in the textile processing industry (product type 9&18)’, INERIS, F. • ‘Emission scenario document for biocides used in taxidermist and embalming processes (product type 22)’, INERIS, F. • Report ‘Proposal for the formats of names, parameters, variables, units and symbols to be used in emission scenario documents’ , RIVM, NL. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 38 EUBEES 2: objectives and results (1) 1 Development of harmonised ESDs: PT 11: preservatives liquid cooling & processing PT 12: slimicides PT 13: metal working fluid preservatives [PT 21: antifouling products (in OECD)] 2 Check ESDs for existing substances on their suitability for biocides: PT 1: human hygiene biocidal products PT 6: in-can preservatives PT 7: film preservatives PT 9: fibre, leather, rubber, polymerised material pres. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 39 EUBEES 2: objectives and results (2) 3 Provide a framework for EU discussion and agreement of new ESDs developed by the members, eg.: PT 5: drinking water disinfectants PT 10: masonry preservatives PT 14: rodenticides PT 18: insecticides (in stables and manure) 4 Test the scenarios for wood preservatives developed by OECD and rodenticides developed by the Nordics in the framework of EUBEES, primarily with regard to usability. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 40 OECD ESD on antifouling products • Antifoulants: inhibit growth of organisms on ship hulls, fishing nets, marine structures. (several definitions!) • Aim: OECD-wide harmonisation of available emission scenarios for anti-fouling applications. • Most antifoulings, ie. 95% are used on ship hulls. Almost all available scenarios deal with the estimation of releases of antifoulings during the service life. • The EESAF steering group will have its third meeting in November 2003. The draft ESD is intended to be finalised early 2004 and submitted to the OECD JM end 2004. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 41 ESDs for Main Group 1 (disinfectants) • PT 01: Human hygiene biocidal products (RIVM, EUBEES2) • PT 02: Private and public health area disinfectants – – – – – – – – Medical equipment (EU) Accomodation (RIVM) Industrial areas Swimming pools (RIVM) Air-conditioning Chemical toilets Wastewater treatment (RIVM) Hospital waste r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 42 ESDs for Main Group 1 (disinfectants) • PT 03: Veterinary hygiene biocidal products () (RIVM) • PT 04: Food and feed area disinfectants • PT 05: Drinking water disinfectants ( ) (UBA EUBEES 2 CA) EUBEES r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 43 ESDs for Main Group 2 (preservatives) • PT 07: Film preservatives – – – – Paints & coatings (PT 06) Plastics (PT 09) Glues & adhesives (RIVM) Paper & cardboard (RIVM) • PT 08: Wood preservatives (OECD) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 44 ESDs for Main Group 2 (preservatives) • PT 09: Fibre, leather, rubber & polymer pres. – – – – Textiles & fabrics (EU) Leather & hides (EU) Paper & cardboard (EU) Rubber, polymers, etc. • PT 10: Masonry preservatives () (EUBEES 2 CA) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 45 ESDs for Main Group 2 (preservatives) • PT 11: Preservatives for liquid cooling & processing systems – Cooling systems () (EUBEES 2 CA) – Processing water & liquids • PT 12: Slimicides – Paper & pulp () (EUBEES 2 TM) – Mineral oil extraction () (EUBEES 2 TM) • PT 13: Metalworking-fluid preservatives () (EUBEES 2 CA) r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 46 ESDs for Main Group 3 (pest control) • PT 14: Rodenticides () (DK EUBEES 2 CA) • PT 15: Avicides () (F EUBEES 2 TM) • PT 16: Molluscicides • PT 17: Piscicides E = c pond r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 47 ESDs for Main Group 3 (pest control) • PT 18: Insecticides, acaricides and products to control other arthropods – Manure & stables () (RIVM) – Refuse dumps – Fumigants (RIVM) • PT 19: Repellents and attractants r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 48 ESDs for Main Group 4 (other products) • PT 20: Preservatives for food & feedstocks • PT 21: Antifouling products () ongoing • PT 22: Embalming and taxidermist fluids (EU) • PT 23: Control of other vertebrates r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 49 EU Risk Assessment TGD new version • Harmonised Approach to Risk Assessment of New Chem, Existing Chem and Biocides • Harmonised Approach to Risk Assessment in the Marine Environment (N.E.B. and OSPAR) • Include in Guidance what has been learned in the Existing and New Chemicals areas • Include specific guidance for Biocides (i.e. emission scenarios!) • Reducing discussion time and disagreements through increasing the extent of guidance http://ecb.jrc.it > documents r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 50 Revised TGD (2003): relevant exposure assessment issues • More complete life cycle assessment • Release estimation – emissions from long-life articles – emissions from waste disposal including recovery • Unintentional uses: calculation of background concentrations r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 51 Nice questions! (1) • Should the waste stage be included in the exposure assessment of biocides? • Yes, the BPD in principle covers also waste stage • However the TGD (2003) and the OECD PT8 ESD do not contain models to quantify emissions from waste stage. Relevant assumptions would include (wood preservatives): – – – – how much wood enters the waste stage how much of that goes to landfill, resp. incineration how much of the a.i. is still left in the wood etc.. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 52 Nice questions! (2) • How to use the new (TGD) long-life article emission scenario for wood preservatives and what is the relation to the OECD wood in service scenario? • The TGD approach deals with constant emissions over a long time and relates to the regional scale. • The OECD scenarios should be followed for wood preservatives. The scenario for wood in service has a different approach. The TGD scenario does not apply for wood preservatives. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 53 Nice questions! (3) • How should background concentrations and PEC regional be calculated for biocides? Which releases should be taken into account? • Biocides emissions generally pertain to local emissions and result in calculations of PEC local. • Background concentrations and PEC regional can therefore normally not be determined. r Environmental risks of biocides | Peter van der Zandt & Paul van der Poel 54