cprog - Personal.psu.edu

advertisement
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Consumer response to
communication
programs
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Outline
• Communication objectives
• Attitudes and their measurement
• Attitude change and persuasion
– The two routes to persuasion
– Central-route approaches
– Peripheral-route approaches
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Communication objectives
• Category need
• Brand awareness
• Brand attitude
• Brand purchase intention/purchase
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Attitudes
definition:
a tendency to evaluate people (e.g., a salesperson), objects
(e.g., a product, an ad), or events (e.g., the purchase of a
brand) with some degree of favorability or unfavorability;
components of an attitude:
– cognitive component: beliefs about the attitude concept;
– affective component: feeling-based reactions toward the
attitude concept;
– conative component: overt behavioral responses or
intentions to act;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Measurement of attitudes
• Likert scaling: statements that are thought to
reflect either a favorable or unfavorable attitude
toward the concept of interest are rated on agreedisagree scales (typically 5-point scales) and the
ratings are then summated (after reverse-scoring
negative items);
• semantic differential scaling: the attitude
concept is rated on a series of bipolar adjective
scales (typically 7-point scales) such as good-bad,
favorable-unfavorable, or pleasant-unpleasant;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Advertising is generally informative.
__1__ __2__ __3__ __4__ __5__
strongly
disagree
disagree
neither
agree
strongly
agree
Most advertising insults my intelligence.
__1__ __2__ __3__ __4__ __5__
strongly
disagree
disagree
neither
agree
strongly
agree
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
My attitude toward advertising can be best
described as:
Positive
_1_
_2_
_3_
_4_
_5_
_6_
_7_
Negative
Unfavorable _1_
_2_
_3_
_4_
_5_
_6_
_7_
Favorable
Good
_2_
_3_
_4_
_5_
_6_
_7_
Bad
_1_
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Two routes to persuasion
• there are two routes to persuasion:
– central route: people scrutinize the arguments in the
message;
– peripheral route: cues that are not based on a careful
consideration of the true merits of the message can have
persuasive impact;
• a person’s motivation and/or ability to engage in
issue-relevant thinking determines the route:
– when motivation and ability are high, attitudes change
follows the central route;
– when motivation and/or ability are low, attitude change
occurs via the peripheral route;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
The two routes to attitude change
persuasive
communication
nature of cognitive processing ?
motivation
to process ?
yes
yes
ability
to process ?
no
no
peripheral
cue present ?
yes
peripheral
attitude shift
favorable
neither or
unfavorable
thoughts
neutral thoughts
thoughts
predominate
predominate
predominate
central positive
attitude change
central negative
attitude change
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Influences on persuasion
variables can influence the extent and direction of
attitude change by:
• serving as persuasive arguments (e.g., weak vs.
strong arguments);
• serving as peripheral cues (e.g., source expertise
or attractiveness, number of arguments);
• affecting the extent and direction of message
elaboration (e.g., involvement as a determinant of
motivation to process and distraction as a
determinant of ability to process);
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Effects of the two routes
to persuasion
• centrally changed attitudes are relatively
enduring, resistant to counterpersuasion,
and predictive of behavior;
• peripherally changed attitudes are more
temporary, susceptible to counterpersuasion, and less predictive of behavior;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Involvement and persuasion
(Petty et al.)
•
•
•
•
•
•
160 Ss were exposed to 12 ads, one of which was the target ad for a fictitious
product called the Edge razor;
Ss were assigned to one of the 8 cells in a 2 (involvement: low or high) x 2
(argument quality: weak or strong) x 2 (peripheral cue: celebrity or
noncelebrity status) factorial design;
involvement was manipulated by promising Ss a gift of either a brand of
disposable razors or a brand of toothpaste and by telling Ss that Edge razors
would soon be introduced in their own city or test marketed in another part of
the country;
argument quality was manipulated by presenting five cogent (e.g., advanced
honing method for unsurpassed sharpness) or five specious (e.g., floats in
water with a minimum of rust) product claims in the ad;
in the celebrity status condition, famous golf and tennis celebrities endorsed
the product, in the noncelebrity status condition Bakersfield, CA, endorsed it;
attitude toward the product and purchase intentions as the dependent variables;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Involvement and persuasion (cont’d)
• attitudes: significant involvement x endorser and involvement x argument
quality interactions;
attitude
attitude
strong arguments
noncelebrity
celebrity
low
high
involvement
weak arguments
low
high
involvement
• intentions: argument quality was a more important determinant of
purchase intentions under high rather than low involvement; attitudes
were better predictors of intentions under high involvement;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Central-route persuasion:
Fishbein’s expectancy-value model
attitudes are a function of the strength of beliefs about
the attitude concept and the evaluative aspect of those
beliefs;
Ac = S bi ei
components:
• number of salient beliefs (i=1, ..., n)
• strength of each belief ( bi )
• evaluative aspect of each belief (ei )
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
My attitude toward Jif creamy peanut butter
can be best described as:
Unfavorable
___
(1)
___
(2)
___
(3)
___
(4)
___
(5)
___
(6)
___
(7)
Favorable
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
creamy
fatty
Jif
fresh roasted
peanut taste
Unlikely
___
(1)
___
(2)
___
(3)
___
(4)
___
(5)
___
(6)
___
(7)
Bad
___
(-3)
___
(-2)
___
(-1)
___
(0)
___ ___ ___
(+1) (+2) (+3)
Likely
Good
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Changing cognitive structure
using the EV model
• add a new positive belief;
• increase the strength of an existing positive
belief;
• increase the evaluation of a strongly held
positive belief;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Central-route persuasion:
The cognitive response model
• people actively relate information contained
in persuasive messages to extant knowledge
stored in memory and generate idiosyncratic
thoughts in response to the message (socalled cognitive responses);
• attitude change depends on
 the extent of processing
 the valence of thoughts
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
The measurement of
cognitive responses
• use of post-message thought listings to
assess cognitive responses;
• when content analyzing subjects’ thought
protocols, cognitive responses are often
classified as support arguments, counter
arguments, or source derogations;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Peripheral-route persuasion
• source effects: credibility, attractiveness, and
liking of the spokesperson;
• message effects: number of arguments,
inferences based on brand name or product
attributes, etc.;
• context effects: message repetition, program
or editorial context, mood;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Using classical (respondent)
conditioning for peripheral persuasion
I.
II.
UCS
UCS
elicits
elicits
UCR
UCR
paired with
NS (CS to be)
III.
CS
comes to elicit
CR
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Classical conditioning (cont’d)
• CS and UCS should be paired repeatedly and
consistently;
• forward conditioning is better than backward
conditioning;
• CC is more effective when the UCS and CS are
novel, salient, and relevant or similar to each other
(because associations are more easily formed);
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Music and pen choice (Gorn)
• one-minute extract of music from “Grease” as the
positive UCS, one minute of atonal Indian
classical music as the negative UCS; light blue
and beige pens as originally neutral CS;
• Ss watched a slide of either a light blue or beige
pen while hearing either liked or disliked music;
• as a reward for their participation in the study, Ss
could choose either a light blue or beige pen;
• finally, Ss were asked why they had picked a pen
with a particular color;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Music and pen choice (cont’d)
• effect of music on pen choice:
choice of
choice of nonadvertised pen advertised pen
liked
music
79%
21%
disliked
music
30%
70%
• 91% of the people who provided a reason for their choice
mentioned color preference as their reason;
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Attitudes and behavior:
The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)
(Fishbein and Ajzen)
B = f(BI) = w1 Aact + w2 SN
where: B
=
BI
=
Aact
=
SN
=
w1, w2 =
behavior
behavioral intention
attitude toward the behavior
subjective norm
weights that reflect the relative influence
of Aact and SN
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Components of the TRA
Aact: a person’s evaluation of performing the behavior
Aact = S bi ei
components:
• outcomes or consequences of behavior (i=1, ..., m)
• strength of behavioral beliefs (bi)
• evaluative aspect of each outcome or consequence (ei)
SN: a person’s perceptions of the social pressures put on
him or her to perform the behavior
SN = S NBj MCj
components:
• relevant referents for behavior (j=1, ..., n)
• strength of normative beliefs (NBj)
• motivation to comply (MCj)
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Components of the TRA (cont’d)
BI: a plan or an expectation to perform the behavior, which is a
function of both personal and social factors;
BI = w1 Aact + w2 SN
B: actual performance of the behavior
B = f(BI)
Note: if a person does not have complete control over performance of
the behavior, behavioral intentions and behavior may also be a function
of the person’s perceived behavioral control (i.e., how easy or difficult
performance of the behavior is thought to be);
In-class exercise: Predicting coupon usage
Consumer 1
Consumer 2
Consumer 3
CU
10
20
2
BI
6
9
2
b1
5
7
2
b2
4
1
2
b3
3
2
2
e1
2
3
0
e2
0
1
-1
e3
0
1
-1
NB1
1
4
3
NB2
2
2
3
MC1
3
3
2
MC2
3
3
1
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
TRA applied to coupon usage (cont’d)
EV1
.71a
rewards
EV2
-.08b
Aact
encumbrances
EV3
.51a
-.12a
inconveniences
NB1MC1
BI
B
.48a
spouse
NB2MC2
.68a
.10b
SN
.31a
family
NB3MC3
friends
.05
Note: standardized path coefficients,
with a p<.01, b p<.05 (one-tailed)
Consumer Behavior
Communication programs
Conditions under which attitudes and
intentions will predict behavior
• volitional control
• correspondence in level of specificity
–
–
–
–
action: single/multiple acts
target: concept at which action is directed
context: situational circumstance of action
time: when an action is to be performed
• stability of attitudes and intentions
Download