BELL HIGH SCHOOL
Performance
Dialogue
CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and Performance
Meter Progress Report
PLC Meeting
August 27, 2013
Objectives
• Review the results of the 2013 CST results:
B
H
S
• What does the data show for our school, our
department, our PLC?
• What are the obvious patterns among the data?
• What are the trends or commonalities?
• Describe the range of data. What are the high (s), low
(s) and average (s)?
• Dialogue on classroom implications
• Analyze CST results and prior year CSTs and PAs
to date
• Use strategy grid for analyzing results and
determining next steps
2
Performance Management Cycle
School Vision,
Goals, and Core
Beliefs
B
H
S
Goals and
Targets
Results and
Implications
Performance
Dialogues and
Plan
Adjustments
Planning
Performance
Tracking
3
Strategy grid for analyzing results
and determining next steps
B
H
S
4
Key Instructional Strategies
B
H
S
• What have been your key strategies (action steps) to
increasing math, ELA, science and social studies
achievement?
• How might you describe the level of implementation
around those? Who is doing it and how often? How
effectively?
• What challenges, if any, have you experienced
during implementation?
5
English Language Arts
CA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
2012 %
Adv. &
Prof.
2013 %
Adv. &
Prof.
% DIFF
Adv. &
Prof.
2012 %
FBB &
BB
2013 %
FBB &
BB
% DIFF
FBB &
BB
English
9
34
39
+5
29
25
-4
English
10
32
38
+6
28
25
-3
English
11
38
38
0
26
21
-5
English
Total
34
38
+4
28
24
-4
Subject
B
H
S
English Language Arts
CA Standards Test Four Year Trend
B
H
S
English Periodic Assessments
CST Predictive Model
2012 PA 1
CST Adv/Pr
of
B
H
S
PA 1
PA 2
PA 2
PA 3
PA 3
Participation
Rate
Adv/Pr
of
Participatio
n
Rate
Adv/Prof
Participation
Rate
2013
CST
ELA 9
34%
36%
96.6%
23%
83.3%
31%
95%
39%
ELA 10
32%
49%
98.1%
33%
84.6%
43%
95%
38%
English Language Arts
CAHSEE Census
Two Year Comparison
English
ELA %
Passing
ELA %
Proficient
2013
Total
2012
Total
72%
38%
72%
33%
Difference
+0%
+5%
High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores
B
H
S
Mathematics
CA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
Subject
2012 %
Adv. &
Prof.
2013 %
Adv. &
Prof.
% DIFF
Adv. &
Prof.
2012 %
FBB &
BB
2013 %
FBB &
BB
% DIFF
FBB &
BB
Algebra
20
23
+3
58
53
-5
Geometry
15
8
-7
63
75
+12
Algebra
2
41
30
-11
37
46
+9
Math
Total
25
21
-4
52
57
+5
B
H
S
Mathematics
CA Standards Test Four Year Trend
B
H
S
Mathematic Periodic Assessments
CST Predictive Model
2012 PA 1
CST Adv/Pr
of
B
H
S
PA 1
PA 2
PA 2
PA 3
PA 3
Participation
Rate
Adv/Pr
of
Participatio
n
Rate
Adv/Prof
Participation
Rate
2013
CST
Algebra
20%
32%
78.3%
21%
77.3%
25%
95.7%
23%
Geomet
15%
6%
74.4%
2%
79.1%
9%
94.5%
8%
Mathematics
CAHSEE Census
Two Year Comparison
Math
Math %
Passing
Math %
Proficient
2013
Total
2012
Total
82%
59.2%
81%
55%
Difference
+1%
+4.2%
High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores
B
H
S
Social Studies
CA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
2012 %
Adv. &
Prof.
2013 %
Adv. &
Prof.
% DIFF
Adv. &
Prof.
2012 %
FBB &
BB
2013 %
FBB &
BB
% DIFF
FBB &
BB
US
History
41
47
+6
29
22
-7
World
History
30
33
+3
37
36
-1
History
Total
35
39
+4
33
30
-3
Subject
B
H
S
Social Studies
CA Standards Test Four Year Trend
B
H
S
Social Studies
Periodic Assessments
CST Predictive Model
2012 PA 1
CST Adv/Pr
of
History 10 30%
37%
B
H
S
PA 1
PA 2
PA 2
PA 3
PA 3
Participation
Rate
Adv/Pro
f
Participation
Rate
Adv/Prof
Participation
Rate
93.8%
25%
67.5%
31%
95%
2013
CST
36%
Science
CA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
2012 %
Adv. &
Prof.
2013 %
Adv. &
Prof.
% DIFF
Adv. &
Prof.
2012 %
FBB &
BB
2013%
FBB &
BB
% DIFF
FBB &
BB
Life
Science
33
40
+7
32
27
-5
Biology
37
27
-10
26
32
+6
Chem.
22
30
+8
48
32
-16
Science
Total
30
32
+2
35
31
-4
Subject
B
H
S
Science
CA Standards Test Four Year Trend
B
H
S
Science Periodic Assessments - CST
Predictive Model
2012
CST
B
H
S
PA 1
PA 1
PA 2
PA 2
PA 3
PA 3
Adv/Pr
of
Participation
Rate
Adv/Pr
of
Participation
Rate
Adv/Pr
of
Participation
Rate
2013
CST
Biology
37%
7%
77.1%
6%
71.3%
12%
95.7%
27%
Chemistry
22%
38%
91.7%
17%
73.3%
29%
94.5%
30%
2012-13 QEIA Goals
Achievement
Requirements
2012-13
QEIA
Goals
2012-13
QEIA Results
Met
Yes / No
9th Grade ELA CST
Proficiency or
Above
36%
39%
YES
9th Grade
Matriculation
71%
78%
YES
9th Grade Algebra 1
CST Proficiency or
Above
21%
28%
YES
World & US History
Proficiency or
Above
24%
39%
YES
Biology & Chemistry
Proficiency or
Above
20%
28%
YES
API Exceed Target
Growth
7
20*
Pending
*Estimate without
B
H
S
Interpreting Progress
Towards Targets
B
H
S
In looking at the PA and CST results, what do you notice?
What patterns do you see? Have you reached your CST
target?
If you made gains you desired, what attributed to the gains in
your estimates?
If this data remains constant, what might be the possible
reasons?
What successful instructional practices/strategies are being
implemented to address the needs of your students?
What are your hunches about what might need to happen
next to impact this data?
What other data do you still need?
22
Revisiting Strategies
B
H
S
Based on your data for the school year and your
classroom observations, to what extent is your
instructional plan working effectively?
What strategies did you call out?
23
Strategy grid for analyzing results
and determining next steps
B
H
S
24
Intervention Design – How
do we respond to the data?
B
H
S
Based on today’s dialogue what can you add,
continue, or modify to sustain and/or improve your
results?
How can we leverage the strengths of your
department to support our school in improving?
As the Instructional Leader, Department
Administrator, Department Chair, what
action/commitment will be your first priority?
25