SOCIETIES CREATE
DEVIANCE….How?
Deviant Act
Society creates deviance in a few ways:
• societal arrangements create conditions for deviant acts
• Societies create rules and sanctions for rule violation
Self-Concept/labeling
Formed in relation to other people because we identify with
institutions in society and significant others
Internalize subtle cues and overt cues
Power to deflect a deviant label is unequally distributed
Differential Social Power
Power
to apply or deflect a deviant label is
not equally available
Saints and roughnecks article
Police & the black male article
Homicide victims by race:
49% are white
49% are African American
2% other
Perspectives
FUNCTIONALISM
Socialization is the primary mechanism for
integrating people into society
Much socialization is successful; sometimes it
does not work properly, which leads to
deviance
Deviance is result of role and value conflicts,
societal dysfunction
• We need conformity for society to function
• We need social control to function
Conflict Perspective
Harm
is the injustice done to large groups
of marginalized people
Socialization & laws support the interests of
the dominant order or class
Socialization can be coercive or subtle (mass
media)
Socialization is a way to ensure that the
unequal divisions in society remain
Symbolic Interactionist
Socialization is how we get our self-concepts
We learn who we are through our interactions
with others
We learn to be deviant or learn our deviant
identities from others
Much deviant behavior is learned in a social process
(learning theory)
Deviant labels effect our self-concepts (labeling
theory)
LABELING THEORY
Howard Becker and Edwin Lemert (1960s)
Combines Conflict and Symbolic Interaction
How so?
Deviance is not something in the act itself but in the labeling of
the act and the actor
• Labels involve social power
Deviance is dependent upon audience interpretation
Most deviance undetected (so does that deviance even exist?)
Deviant labels have consequences for individual self-identity
• Self-fulfilling prophecy
• Labeling Theory says:
Everyone deviates
• So “why” is not important question
The categories of deviant/non-deviant are
socially constructed (i.e. made up by people,
not intrinsically real)
Labeling
theory argues that a negative
label will enhance one’s deviance by
Exacting consequences that affect life
chances
Changing self-concept in such a way as to
make deviant status one’s “master status”
• Primary deviance
• Secondary deviance
Labeling creates a self-fulfilling prophecy
Assumptions of Labeling Theory
Variety
of causes or influences lead to
initial (primary) deviance
Official label after detection
Labeling changes self-concept/identity
Continued involvement in deviance
Amplification of deviance (secondary
deviance)
Becker’s Typology
NOT
LABELED
RULE
ABIDING
LABELED
Conforming Falsely
Citizen
Accused
RULE
Secret
BREAKING Deviant
“Pure”
Deviant
Evidence?
What does labeling theory explain?
Those formally processed
What does it not explain?
Lots!
Deviant careers can develop without labeling
• embezzlement, secret sexual lives, white collar crime
• Applies mostly to lower income crimes
• Tertiary deviance= social movement formation, political
activism, resistance
Evidence re: juveniles
Question…
Which do you think is true? If there are two kids who get
picked up by police for knocking over a mailbox. Kid A
gets released to his parents; Kid B gets processed in
juvenile court.
1.Kid A is more likely to become an adult
criminal
2. Kid B is more likely to become an adult
criminal
Learning theory
Differential Association
Theory
Deviance is learned
• Face to face interaction with others
• “excess of definitions favorable to committing
crimes”
Opposes biological models
• Opposes idea that deviance caused by mental
illness