Course Year Version : S0484/Foundation Engineering : 2007 : 1/0 Session 7 – 8 SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION SHALLOW FOUNDATION Topic: • General • Immediate Settlement • Consolidation Settlement GENERAL The settlement of shallow foundation may be divided into three broad categories: 1. Immediate settlement, which is caused by the elastic deformation of dry soil and of moist and saturated soils without any change in the moisture content. Immediate settlement are generally based on equations derived from the elasticity theory 2. Primary consolidation settlement, which is the result of a volume change in saturated cohesive soils because of expulsion of the water that occupies the void spaces. 3. Secondary consolidation settlement, which is observed in saturated cohesive soils and is the result of the plastic adjustment of soil particles. This course will focus at immediate and primary consolidation settlement only. IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT General Equation (Harr, 1966) • Flexibel Foundation – At the corner of foundation Se L B ; H= B.qo 1 s2 Es 2 B.qo 1 s2 Es B.q o Se 1 s2 av Es – At the center of foundation Se – Average 1 m 2 1 1 1 m 2 m ln m. ln 1 m 2 1 1 m 2 m ; m • Rigid Foundation Se B.qo 1 s2 r Es Es = Modulus of elasticity of soil B = Foundation width L = Foundation length IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT If Df = 0 and H < , the elastic settlement of foundation can be determined from the following formula: (corner of rigid foundation) (corner of flexible foundation) 2 2 B.qo 2 1 s F1 1 s 2 s F2 1 s Se Es 2 Se B.qo 1 s2 1 s2 F1 1 s 2 s2 F2 Es The variations of F1 and F2 with H/B are given in the graphs of next slide IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT EXAMPLE Problem: A foundation is 1 m x 2 m in plan and carries a net load per unit area, qo = 150 kN/m2. Given, for the soil, Es = 10,000 kN/m2, s 0.3. Assuming the foundation to be flexible, estimate the elastic settlement at the center of the foundation for the following conditions: a. Df = 0 and H = b. Df = 0 and H = 5 m EXAMPLE Solution: Part a. Se B.qo 1 s2 Es For L/B = 2/1 = 2 1.53, so Se (1)(150) 1 0.32 (1.53) 0.0209m 20.9mm 10,000 Part b. Se B'.qo 1 s2 1 s2 F1 1 s 2 s2 F2 Es For L’/B’ = 2, and H/B’ = 10 F1 0.638 and F2 0.033, so Se (0.5)(150) 1 0.32 1 0.32 (0.638) 1 0.3 2(0.3) 2 (0.033) x 4 0.0163m 16.3mm 10,000 IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT General Equation (Bowles, 1982) 1 s2 S e q o .B'. .F1 Es L' M B' 1 1 M2 1 M2 N2 M M2 1 1 N2 F1 M . ln ln 2 2 2 2 M 1 M N 1 M M N 1 N H B' Es = Modulus of elasticity of soil H = effective layer thickness, ex. 2 - 4B below foundation At the center of Foundation At the corner of Foundation L' L 2 L' L B 2 and F1 time by 4 B' B and F1 time by 1 B' IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT • For saturated clay soil qo .B S e A1 .A 2 Es IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT • For sandy soil z2 Iz S e C1 .C 2 q q z 0 Es where: – Iz = factor of strain influence – C1 = correction factor to thickness of embedment foundation = 1 – 0.5x[q/(q-q)] – C2 = correction factor due to soil creep = 1+0,2.log(t/0,1) – t = time in years – q = stress caused by external load – q = . Df IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT Young Modulus Circle Foundation or L/B =1 z=0 Iz = 0.1 z = z1 = 0,5 B Iz = 0.5 z = z2 = 2B Iz = 0.0 Foundation with L/B ≥ 10 z=0 Iz = 0.2 z = z1 = B Iz = 0.5 z = z2 = 4B Iz = 0.0 EXAMPLE A shallow foundation 3 m x 3 m (as shown in the following drawing). The subgrade is sandy soil with Young modulus varies based on N-SPT value (use the following correlation: Es = 766N) Determine the settlement occur in 5 years (use strain influence method) EXAMPLE EXAMPLE Depth (m) z (m) Es (kN/m2) Iz (average) (m3/kN) 0.0 – 1.0 1.0 8000 0.233 0.291 x 10-4 1.0 – 1.5 0.5 10000 0.433 0.217 x 10-4 1.5 – 4.0 2.5 10000 0.361 0.903 x 10-4 4.0 – 6.0 2.0 16000 0.111 0.139 x 10-4 Iz z Es q 17.8 x1.5 1 0.5 0.9 C1 1 0.5 160 17 . 8 x 1 . 5 q q 1.55 x 10-4 t 5 C2 1 0.2. log 1 0.2. log 1.34 0 . 1 0 . 1 2B S e C1.C2 . q q 0 Iz .z Es S e (0.9)(1.34)(160 17.8 x1.5)(1.55 x10 4 ) S e 24.8mm CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT • Normal Consolidation pc po or pc 1 po po p Cc Sc .Hc . log 1 eo po • Over consolidation pc p c p o or 1 po po + p < pc po < pc < po+p Sc p p Cs .Hc . log o 1 eo po Sc p p p Cs Cc .H c . log c .H c . log o 1 eo po 1 eo pc CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT where: – – – – – eo = initial void ratio Cc = compression index Cs = swelling index pc = preconsolidation pressure po = average effective pressure on the clay layer before the construction of the foundation = ’.z – p = average increase of pressure on the clay layer caused by the foundation construction and other external load, which can be determine using method of 2:1, Boussinesq, Westergaard or Newmark. Alternatively, the average increase of pressure (p) may be approximated by: 1 p pt 4pm pb 6 pt = the pressure increase at the top of the clay layer pm = the pressure increase at the middle of the clay layer pb = the pressure increase at the bottom of the clay layer CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT EXAMPLE A foundation 1m x 2m in plan is shown in the following figure. Estimate the consolidation settlement of the foundation. Assume the clay is normally consolidated. EXAMPLE po p Cc Sc .Hc . log 1 eo po po = (2.5)(16.5) + (0.50)(17.5-10) +(1.25)(16-10) = 52.5 kN/m2 qo .B.L 2:1 method B z L z 150.1.2 p 13.45 kN / m 2 1 3.252 3.25 p Sc 0.32 52.5 13.45 2.5 x log 44 mm 1 0.8 52.5 ALLOWABLE SETTLEMENT