The Common Core - Capital High School

advertisement

The Common Core

An Introduction

Topics

Timeline of Implementation

Shifts in Common Core

The Standards

Relevance and Rigor

Implications

Background

The Background of the Common Core

◦ Initiated by the National Governor’s

Association and Council of Chief State School

Officers with the following design principles:

 Result in College and Career Readiness

 Based on solid research and practice evidence

 Fewer, Higher, Clearer

Timeline

CCSS and NGSS

Phase 1 – CCSS and NGSS

Exploration

Phase 2 – Building awareness and begin building capacity

Phase 3 – Build statewide capacity and classroom transitions

Phase 4 – Statewide application and assessment

2011-12

X

2012-13

X

X

X

2013-14

X

X

X

2014-15

X

X

X

2015-16 2016-17

X

X X

X X

2014-15 Spring Testing Schedule

End of January 2015 – EOC Math and Bio

March – HSPE Reading and Writing (11 th and 12 th Grade Retakes only)

April – May – SBAC ELA and Math

May – 10 th Grade ELA Exam

June – EOC Math and Bio

Getting Started

Phase 1 – Exploration and Awareness

◦ Take the time to immerse yourself in and learn about

 The WHY and the WHAT

 The background and vision of the CCR Standards

 Major shifts in the content

 Connectioins across content and initiatives (TPEP)

 The HOW

 Our state’s approach toward supporting implementation

 Emerging resources and support systems

Introduction to the

ELA/Literacy

Shifts of the

Common Core

State Standards

The CCSS Requires Three Shifts in

ELA / Literacy

1. Regular practice with complex text and its academic language

2. Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational

3. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction

SHIFT #1

Regular Practice with Complex Text and it’s Academic

Language

Regular Practice With Complex Text and its

Academic Language: Why?

Gap between complexity of college and high school texts is huge.

What students can read, in terms of complexity is the greatest predictor of success in college (ACT study).

Too many students are reading at too low a level.

(<50% of graduates can read sufficiently complex texts).

Standards include a staircase of increasing text complexity from elementary through high school.

Standards also focus on building general academic vocabulary so critical to comprehension.

What are the Features of Complex Text?

Subtle and/or frequent transitions

Multiple and/or subtle themes and purposes

Density of information

Unfamiliar settings, topics or events

Lack of repetition, overlap or similarity in words and sentences

Complex sentences

Uncommon vocabulary

Lack of words, sentences or paragraphs that review or pull things together for the student

Longer paragraphs

Any text structure which is less narrative and/or mixes structures

Scaffolding Complex Text

The standards require that students read appropriately complex text at each grade level – independently (Standard 10).

However there are many ways to sca ff old student learning as they meet the standard:

◦ Mutiple readings

◦ Read Aloud

◦ Chunking text (a little at a time)

Provide support while reading, rather than before.

Close Analytic Reading

Requires prompting students with questions to unpack unique complexity of any text so students learn to read complex text independently and proficiently.

Not teacher "think aloud“.

Virtually every standard is activated during the course of every close analytic reading exemplar through the use of text dependent questions.

Text dependent questions require text--

‐ based answers –evidence.

Change in Lexiles

Example High School Texts

Shift #2

Reading, Writing, and Speaking Grounded in Evidence from Text, Both Literary and Informational

Reading, Writing and Speaking

Grounded in Evidence from Text: Why?

Most college and workplace writing requires evidence.

Ability to cite evidence di ff erentiates strong from weak student performance on NAEP

Evidence is a major emphasis of the ELA Standards: Reading

Standard 1, Writing Standard 9, Speaking and Listening standards 2, 3, and 4, all focus on the gathering, evaluating and presenting of evidence from text.

Being able to locate and deploy evidence are hallmarks of strong readers and writers

Text-Dependent Questions

Not Text-Dependent

In “Casey at the Bat,” Casey strikes out.

Describe a time when you failed at something.

In “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” Dr.

King discusses non-violent protest.

Discuss, in writing, a time when you wanted to fight against something that you felt was unfair.

In “The Gettysburg Address,” Lincoln says the nation is dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Why is equality an important value to promote?

Text-Dependent

What makes Casey’s experiences at bat humorous?

What can you infer from King’s letter about the letter that he received?

“The Gettysburg Address” mentions the year 1776. According to Lincoln’s speech, why is this year significant to the events described in the speech?

Balance of Literary and Informational Texts

Literature includes

◦ Stories

◦ Drama

◦ Poetry

Shift #3

Building Knowledge through content-rich non-fiction

Content-Rich Nonfiction

Content-Rich Nonfiction

50/50 balance K-5

70/30 in grades 9-12

Students learning to read should exercise their ability to comprehend complex text through read-aloud texts.

In grades 2+, students begin reading more complex texts, consolidating the foundational skills with reading comprehension.

Reading aloud texts that are well-above grade level should be done throughout K-5 and beyond.

Building Knowledge Through

Content-Rich Nonfiction: Why?

Students are required to read very little informational text in elementary and middle school.

Non-fiction makes up the vast majority of required reading in college/workplace.

Informational text is harder for students to comprehend than narrative text.

Supports students learning how to read di ff erent types of informational text.

Sequencing Texts to Build Knowledge

Not random reading

Literacy in social studies/history, science, technical subjects, and the arts is embedded

The “What”: Key Content Shifts –

ELA, Math, Science

Shifts in Mathematics

Focus: fewer topics focused on deeply in each grade

Coherence: Concepts logically connected from one grade to the next and linked to other major topics within the grade

Rigor: Fluency with arithmetic, application of knowledge to real world situations, and deep understanding of mathematical concepts

The “What”: Key Content Shifts –

ELA, Math, Science

Shifts in Science

The NGSS Reflect the Interconnected

Nature of Science through Focus,

Understanding, and Application of

Content

The Science Concepts in the NGSS Build

Coherently from K–12.

Science and Engineering are Integrated across K–12 in the NGSS.

ELA Changes in Emphasis

Collaborative Discussions (Speaking and

Listening)

Argumentative and Narrative Writing

So Who’s Responsible for all of this?

Social Studies, Science and Tech Ed too!

70% of text (over course of a day) should be informational, and responsibility is shared across disciplines!

ELA should add some Literary Nonfiction, but look for informational text in Science,

Social Studies and CTE, too!

Performing and Visual arts – watch for standards soon!

What are the Standards?

Reading Strand

◦ Key Ideas and Details

◦ Craft and Structure

◦ Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

◦ Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity

Writing Strand

• Text Types and Purposes

• Production and Distribution of Writing

• Research to Build Knowledge

• Range of Writing

What are the Standards?

Speaking and Listening Strand

◦ Comprehension and Collaboration

◦ Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas

Language Strand

◦ Conventions of Standard English

◦ Knowledge of Language

◦ Vocabulary Acquisition and Use

College and Career Readiness

Standards (Anchor Standards)

Overarching standards for each of four strands that are further defined by gradespecific standards

Reading – 10 Standards

Writing – 10 Standards

Speaking and Listening – 6 Standards

Language – 6 Standards

The ELA CCSS Code

W. 11-12. 1b

Strand Grades Standard Number

(Writing) (11-12)

(Text types and purposes:

Develop claims)

Structure of the Standards

Four Strands: Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Language

CCR Standards – Anchor Standards

◦ (That by which all else is measured!)

Grade Specific Standards progressing to

CCR’s

In addition to RL and RI strands, there are strands for Reading and Writing within

History/Social Studies, Science and

Technical Subjects

Vertical Articulation Asks:

How are the content standards related from one year to the next?

◦ Deepening of the cognitive processes for the same content

◦ Knowledge or skills extend to a wider range of skills

◦ New content or skills are introduced

◦ Level of scaffolding/teacher support decreased

Example of Grade-Level Progression in Reading

Reading Standards for

Literature

Grade 3 – Describe characters in a story and explain how their actions contribute to the sequence of events

Grade 7 – Analyze how particular elements of a story or drama interact.

Grade 11-12 – Evaluate various explanations for character’s actions or for events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves the matters uncertain .

Reading Standards for

Informational Text

Grade 3 - Describe the relationships between a series of historical events, scientific ideas of concepts, or steps in technical procedures in a text, using language that pertains to time, sequence and cause/effect

Grade 7 – Analyze the interactions between individuals, events and ideas in a text

Grade 11-12 – Analyze a complex set of ideas or sequence of events and explain how specific individuals, ideas or events interact and develop over the course of the text

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Labels the type of thinking needed to complete a task

Tracing the verbs reveals a deepening of the cognitive progression forward from K-12

Evaluation

Synthesis

Analysis

Application

Comprehension

Knowledge

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy

Taxonomy of revised objectives

1950’s – developed by Benjamin Bloom

Means of qualitatively expressing different kinds of thinking

Adapted for classroom use as a planning tool and continues to be one of the most universally applied models

Provides a way to organize thinking skills into six levels, from the most basic to the higher order levels of thinking

In 2001 – Lorin Anderson (former student of

Bloom) revisited the taxonomy, and as a result, a number of changes were made

A Comparison

Original

Evaluation

Synthesis

Analysis

Application

Comprehension

Knowledge

Revised

Creating

Evaluating

Analyzing

Applying

Understanding

Remembering

Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels

Cognitive Processes Verbs

Creating: Putting elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning or producing.

Evaluating: Making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing.

Analyzing: Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing and attributing.

Applying: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing or implementing.

Understanding: Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing and explaining.

Remembering: Retrieving, recognizing and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory

Creating: adapt, build, compose, construct, create, design, develop, elaborate, extend, formulate, generate, hypothesize, invent, make, modify, plan, produce, originate, refine, transform

Evaluating: appraise, assess, critique, defend, evaluate, judge, prioritize, support, test

Analyzing: analyze, ascertain, attribute, connect, deconstruct, determine, differentiate, experiment, focus, infer, inspect, integrate, organize, outline, reduce

Applying: apply, carry out, construct, develop, display, illustrate, model, solve, use

Understanding: categorize, clarify, compare, conclude, contrast, compare, demonstrate, explain, interpret, match, paraphrase, predict, represent, summarize, translate

Remembering: choose, define, describe, identify, label, list, match, name, recall, show, tell

Webb’s DoK Levels

Provides an important perspective of cognitive complexity

Name four different and deeper ways a student might interact with content

Are used by states in test specifications to include both the content assessed in a test item and the intended cognitive demand

◦ Complexity of content (interpreting literal vs. figurative language)

◦ Task required (summarizing in your own words vs. using evidence from various sources to support your summary)

DoK Levels

DoK 4 – Extended Thinking – An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process mulitple conditions of the problem or task; nonroutine manipulations, across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources

DoK 3 – Strategic Thinking – Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires some decision making a justification; abstract, complex or non-routine; often more than one possible answer

DoK 2 – Basic Application of Skills/Concepts – Use of information, conceptual knowledge, select appropriate procedures for task, two or more steps with decision points along the way, routine problems, organize/display data, interpret/use simple graphs

DoK 1 – Recall and Reproduction – Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept or perform a routine procedure

Cognitive Rigor Matrix

by Karen Hess

Combines Bloom’s Taxonomy with Webb’s

Depth of Knowledge framework

A tool for:

◦ Designing units of study that have a range of cognitive demand

◦ Assessing tasks for the thinking they require of a student

The Cognitive Rigor Matrix

Depth +

Thinking

Level 1

Recall &

Reproduction

Level 2

Skills and

Concepts

Level 3

Strategic

Thinking/

Reasoning

Remember

Understand

Apply

Recall, locate, basic facts, details, events

Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident

Use language structure or word relationships to determine meaning

Specify relationships, summarize, identify main ideas

Use context to identify meaning of word, obtain and interpret information using text features

Explain, generalize or connect ideas using supporting evidence

Use concepts to solve non-routine problems

Level 4

Extended

Thinking

Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts

Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem

Analyze Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc

Analyze multiple sources, analyze complex and abstract themes

Evaluate

Create Brainstorm ideas about a topic

Compare literary elements, terms, facts, events.Analyze format, organization and text structures

Analyze or interpret author’s craft to critique a text

Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge

Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures

Synthesize information within one source or text

Evaluate relevancy, accuracy and completeness of information

Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts

Resources

 www.stancoe.org

– DoK examples www.achievethecore.org

– searchable lessons, samples and curriculum tools www.k12.wa.us

– Common Core

Standards in PDF and Printable format www.nationalartstandards.org

– Common

Core Art standards

Download