1

Overview
 Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber
 Section I: Ratee Identification Data
 Section II: Job Description
 Section III: Evaluation Of Performance
 Section IV: Promotion Recommendation

Section V: Rater’s Comments
 Appropriate Bullets
 Inappropriate Bullets
 Overall Instructor Assessment
 EPR comparison (SrA Harris)
2

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE
4. DAFSC
6b. SRID
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT 7. PERIOD OF REPORT
From: Thru:
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)
Inefficient. An unprofessional performer.
Good performer.
Performs routine duties satisfactorily.
Excellent performer.
Consistently produces high quality work.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)
Lacking. Needs considerable improvement.
Sufficient. Gets job accomplished
Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions.
3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)
Ineffective.
Gets satisfactory results.
Highly effective leader.
4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)
Ineffective.
Manages resources in a satisfactory manner.
5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)
Skillful and competent.
Poor.
Sound.
Emphasizes logic and decision making.
6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)
Unprofessional, unreliable.
Meets expectations.
7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)
Sets an example for others to follow.
Unable to communicate effectively.
Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.
Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely.
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2)
(PerFORM PRO)
The exception.
Absolutely superior in all areas.
Excels in knowledge of all related positions.
Mastered all duties.
Exceptionally effective leader.
Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities.
Highly respected and skilled.
Epitomizes the Air
Force professional.
Highly skilled writer and communicator.
3

FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME
Climber, Cliff R.
2. SSN
123-45-6789
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION
20th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345
3. GRADE
SMSgt
4. DAFSC
2A690
6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID
MXOBR549 OJ2MG
7. PERIOD OF REPORT
From: 1 Jan Thru: 31 Dec
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT
365 ANNUAL
4

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE
4. DAFSC
6b. SRID
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT 7. PERIOD OF REPORT
From: Thru:
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)
Inefficient. An unprofessional performer.
Good performer.
Performs routine duties satisfactorily.
Excellent performer.
Consistently produces high quality work.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)
Lacking. Needs considerable improvement.
Sufficient. Gets job accomplished
Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions.
3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)
Ineffective.
Gets satisfactory results.
Highly effective leader.
4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)
Ineffective.
Manages resources in a satisfactory manner.
5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)
Skillful and competent.
Poor.
Unprofessional, unreliable.
Sound.
Meets expectations.
7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)
Emphasizes logic and decision making.
6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)
Sets an example for others to follow.
Unable to communicate effectively.
Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.
Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely.
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2)
(PerFORM PRO)
The exception.
Absolutely superior in all areas.
Excels in knowledge of all related positions.
Mastered all duties.
Exceptionally effective leader.
Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities.
Highly respected and skilled.
Epitomizes the Air
Force professional.
Highly skilled writer and communicator.
5

II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Supervises 24 People. Responsible for effective management of 2 facilities,
4 vehicles, and equipment account valued more than $5 million. Ensures capability to receive, inspect, store, and maintain over 350 line items.
Provides guidance and establishes training standards necessary for effective planning and scheduling of all Sortie Support Flight functions in support of operational and contingency requirements. Ensures expedient completion of all Time Compliance Technical Orders. Establishes accountability for all aircraft training devises. Enforces safety and supply discipline.
ADDITIONAL DUTY: Squadron Performance Measures Coordinator.
6

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE
4. DAFSC
6b. SRID
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT 7. PERIOD OF REPORT
From: Thru:
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)
Inefficient. An unprofessional performer.
Good performer.
Performs routine duties satisfactorily.
Excellent performer.
Consistently produces high quality work.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)
Lacking. Needs considerable improvement.
Sufficient. Gets job accomplished
Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions.
3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)
Ineffective.
Gets satisfactory results.
Highly effective leader.
4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)
Ineffective.
Manages resources in a satisfactory manner.
5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)
Skillful and competent.
Poor.
Unprofessional, unreliable.
Sound.
Meets expectations.
7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)
Emphasizes logic and decision making.
6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)
Sets an example for others to follow.
Unable to communicate effectively.
Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.
Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely.
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2)
(PerFORM PRO)
The exception.
Absolutely superior in all areas.
Excels in knowledge of all related positions.
Mastered all duties.
Exceptionally effective leader.
Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities.
Highly respected and skilled.
Epitomizes the Air
Force professional.
Highly skilled writer and communicator.
7

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
NOT
RECOMMENDED
RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
1
RATER’S RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
V. RATER’S COMMENTS
1
(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )
NOT RECOMMENDED
AT THIS TIME
CONSIDER READY
2 3 4
2 3 4
IMMEDIATE
PROMOTION
5
5
Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
DATE
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
DATE
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
A
B
C
D
VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION
SENIOR RATER
SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL
DUTY TITLE
SSN
IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE
(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)
YES
NO
DATE
SIGNATURE
X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)
8

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
NOT
RECOMMENDED
RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
1
RATER’S RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
V. RATER’S COMMENTS
1
(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )
NOT RECOMMENDED
AT THIS TIME
CONSIDER READY
2 3 4
2 3 4
IMMEDIATE
PROMOTION
5
5
Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
DATE
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
DATE
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE
SSN
VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION
A
B
C
D
SENIOR RATER
SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (REVERSE) (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)
IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE
(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)
YES
NO
DATE
SIGNATURE
X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)
9

Rater’s Comments
 Start with a strong impact statement!
Single-handedly spearheaded squadron ORI preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in
June 200X ORI
10

Rater’s Comments
- Personally created inspection checklists for all sections to ensure compliance with established directives
- Allowed sections to teach other sections their processes; improved working relations between sections
-- Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication of effort, saved over $26,000...decreased equipment support by 25%, pre-flight inspection times by
50%, post-flight inspections by 33%, and no-shows by 73%
11

Rater’s Comments
Constantly striving to improve quality of life for all members of the unit; personally undertook challenge of reducing dormitory problems...rid the dormitory of all incidents of underage drinking/property damage
-- Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to ensure all issues were addressed; morale skyrocketed
-- First dormitory to be selected Dorm of the
Month; showcase for other units on base to emulate
12

Rater’s Comments
- Instilled pride of ownership across all sections; ensured all personnel in customer service positions received customer service training--decreased customer wait time and increased customer satisfaction
- Greatly enhanced civil-military relations…delivered a riveting presentation and was lauded by civic leaders
- Selected SNCO of the year--exemplifies core values and instills pride--promote to CMSgt immediately!
13

Rater’s Comments
 Weak comments would include:
- Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization, making the organization more responsive to enlisted personnel and community partnerships
-- Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House, manned the refreshment booth at the base picnic
-- Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek
Elementary School, hard work praised by school leadership
14

Rater’s Comments
- Spearheaded squadron pre-inspection barbecue to reward efforts of all members for preparation efforts
- POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd ever...emotional day of remembrance carried out to perfection
15

Rater’s Comments
 Inappropriate comments include:
- Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for his consistently superior efforts and outstanding results
16

Feedback Dates
 Midpoint Feedback: 17 Jul
17

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
NOT
RECOMMENDED
RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
1
RATER’S RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
V. RATER’S COMMENTS
1
(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )
NOT RECOMMENDED
AT THIS TIME
CONSIDER READY
2 3 4
2 3 4
IMMEDIATE
PROMOTION
5
5
Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
DATE
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
DATE
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
A
B
C
D
VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION
SENIOR RATER
SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL
DUTY TITLE
SSN
IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE
(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)
YES
NO
DATE
SIGNATURE
X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)
18

67
AF
RA
134
67
AF
RA
134
Overall Instructor
Assessment
19

Mediocre EPR

20

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)
I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)
1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE
5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE
4. DAFSC
6b. SRID
8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT 7. PERIOD OF REPORT
From: Thru:
II. JOB DESCRIPTION
1. DUTY TITLE
2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)
Inefficient. An unprofessional performer.
Good performer.
Performs routine duties satisfactorily.
Excellent performer.
Consistently produces high quality work.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)
Lacking. Needs considerable improvement.
Sufficient. Gets job accomplished
Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions.
3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)
Ineffective.
Gets satisfactory results.
Highly effective leader.
4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)
Ineffective.
Manages resources in a satisfactory manner.
5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)
Skillful and competent.
Poor.
Unprofessional, unreliable.
Sound.
Meets expectations.
7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)
Emphasizes logic and decision making.
6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)
Sets an example for others to follow.
Unable to communicate effectively.
Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.
Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely.
AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2)
(PerFORM PRO)
The exception.
Absolutely superior in all areas.
Excels in knowledge of all related positions.
Mastered all duties.
Exceptionally effective leader.
Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities.
Highly respected and skilled.
Epitomizes the Air
Force professional.
Highly skilled writer and communicator.
21

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
NOT
RECOMMENDED
RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
1
RATER’S RATER’S
RECOMMENDATION
V. RATER’S COMMENTS
1
(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )
NOT RECOMMENDED
AT THIS TIME
CONSIDER READY
2 3 4
2 3 4
IMMEDIATE
PROMOTION
5
5
Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
DATE
NONCONCUR
DUTY TITLE
SSN
CONCUR
DATE
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR
NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION
A
B
C
D
VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION
SENIOR RATER
SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL
DUTY TITLE
SSN
IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE
(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)
YES
NO
DATE
SIGNATURE
X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW
CONCUR
SIGNATURE
NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)
22

Rater’s Comments
- Received laudatory comments for response to a mobility exercise scenario
-- Flawlessly processed over 50 Emergency
Notification Data Cards for mobility personnel
-- Contributed directly to squadron earning overall
"Excellent" rating
- Innovative customer service representative
-- Devised new method for recording customer request
-- Reduced customer waiting time by 25 percent
23

Rater’s Comments
- Accomplished checklist to compare current operating procedures with governing regulations
-- Found and corrected several problem areas reducing time lost due to duplication of efforts
- Completed Community College of the Air Force
English course
-- Improved her written communications skills
-- Reduced grammatical errors on correspondence
- Completed Airman Leadership School...improved overall knowledge for the Air Force
- Displays behavior appropriate for a senior airman; recommend for promotion
24

Summary
 Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber
 Section I: Ratee Identification Data (Not
Assessed)

Section II: Job Description (Not Assessed)
 Section III: Evaluation Of Performance
 Section IV: Promotion Recommendation

Section V: Rater’s Comments
 Appropriate Bullets
 Inappropriate Bullets
 Overall Instructor Assessment
 EPR Comparison
25

26