Stirling Engine - Gaby Waldman

advertisement
Transport Phenomena Fall 2013
Stirling Engine
A Study in Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Morgan Bassford, Nick Eyre, Riva Kahn Hallock, Dante Santos, & Gaby WaldmanFried
12/18/2013
1
Table of Contents
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Background & Motivation .......................................................................................................... 3
Available Technologies ............................................................................................................... 4
Problem/Challenge Statement ................................................................................................... 5
Project Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................... 5
Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................. 6
Engine Prototype 1: Beta Type Aluminum Can Engine............................................................ 6
Engine Prototype 2: Gamma Type Machined Engine .............................................................. 7
Analysis & Discussion ................................................................................................................ 8
Fluids ..................................................................................................................................... 8
Heat ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Dynamic Simulation .................................................................................................................10
Simulink Modeling....................................................................................................................12
Conclusions ..............................................................................................................................12
Reflection on Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................12
Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................................12
Appendix: Equations.................................................................................................................14
Equations of Heat Transfer in Transport Phenomena ...............................................................14
Convection (Forced) ..............................................................................................................14
Convection (Natural or Free) .................................................................................................14
Conduction ............................................................................................................................15
Radiation...............................................................................................................................15
For The Stirling Engine Project .................................................................................................15
Q1 - Forced Convection – Boiling Water ...............................................................................15
Q2 – Conduction – Bottom Plate ...........................................................................................16
Q3 – Convection – Working Fluid .........................................................................................16
Q4 – Conduction – Top Plate ................................................................................................17
Q5 – Natural Convection – Ice Water ....................................................................................18
Total Heat Transfer ...................................................................................................................18
2
Table of Figures
Figure 1: Gamma type engine (left) and a beta type engine (right). ............................................... 4
Figure 2: Our first “soda can” Stirling engine prototype. ............................................................... 6
Figure 3: CAD render of our second prototype. The crankshaft and flywheel are hidden. .............7
Figure 4: A simplified heat flow diagram of our Stirling engine design. Air is heated and cooled
by the two plates as it compresses and expands in the two chambers. The crankshaft and
flywheel are hidden. ........................................................................................................................ 8
Figure 5: the five stages of heat transfer within the Stirling Engine. ............................................. 9
Figure 6: a picture of the temperatures within our Stirling Engine under operating conditions. . 9
Figure 7: Note that with a negative initial velocity, the system corrects and stabilizes at a positive
rotational velocity. ......................................................................................................................... 11
3
Abstract
Stirling engines are closed-cycle heat engines that work by the cyclic convection driven
expansion and contraction of a gas. Due to its high Carnot efficiency, the Stirling engine
can be practically driven by a wide variety of heat sources. In this project, we examined
the design and characterization of a low temperature differential Stirling engine
designed to be powered by an organic energy source. We began by building a very lowcost (VLC) beta-type Stirling engine prototype which suffered from high frictional losses
and provided some proof of concept but was not fully functional. Next we built a second
prototype, a gamma-type design designed to have low friction and be much more
efficient than the first prototype. The second prototype, while based on a known design,
was substantially modified to optimize manufacturability and ease characterization
while maintaining similar performance. It was functional, and we worked to simulate
and characterize the engine’s heat transfer and fluid flow. Finally, we created a
simplified dynamic simulation which aligned with our experimental results.
Background & Motivation
Stirling engines are closed-cycle heat engines that generate power through the
Stirling cycle. In a Stirling engine, a working fluid (commonly air, although noble gases
are frequently used in high-performance engines to reduce explosion risks) is
compressed and heated with an external heat source.1 The working fluid expands,
pushing on a piston (the power stroke) and then is forced to the cool area with a
displacer piston. Once the gas cools, it is compressed by the pistons as they continue to
move from the momentum stored in the flywheel.i1 The compressed gas is then heated
and the cycle begins again.
Stirling engines are still in development for many industries, but are most often
used in hybrid technologies or to power pumps. Stirling engines are heat engines and
can run on much smaller temperature differentials than the their internal combustion
cousins.1 Furthermore, their external heat source need not necessarily be a product of
combustion--they may be run on sustainable alternatives such as solar, compost, bio-gas
and steam. This makes them a very attractive technology to developing nations, and
follows with the UN Millenium Development Goal, “Ensure environmental
sustainability”. Our aim is to possibly also address the National Academy of
Engineering’s Grand Challenge entitled “Make solar economical”. However, the
precision and materials typically required in the manufacture of Stirling engines have
hampered their widespread adoption in countries that could benefit from them most.
No industrial-scale solar Stirling plants currently operate in the United States
despite attempts to implement them in heavily sunlit states. In 2010, Stirling Energy
Systems commissioned and built the 1.5 MW Maricopa plant (a single unit proof of
concept) in Arizona with future plans to build two additional full scale plants (709 MW
and 850 MW). Unfortunately they did not have sufficient equity to finish the additional
4
plants and the Maricopa Plant closed in 2011 after the company went bankrupt trying to
fund the additional projects.ii However, full scale solar Stirling plants exist in Germany
and other European countries.
In terms of power generated per unit area of space, solar Stirling plants are
superior to photovoltaics. The average efficiency of the Carnot cycle with an 100 degree
temperature differential is 17%, which is higher than the average efficiency of a solar cell
at 12%. Furthermore, industrial scale solar Stirling engines operate at a 700 degree
temperature differential which gives a 30% Carnot efficiency.iii However, due to
incredibly high manufacturing and maintenance costs (largely driven by the tight
tolerances required by the engines to function), solar Stirling plants are not a viable
option for large scale energy generation, especially in developing nations.
Available Technologies
Figure 1: Gamma type engine (left)iv and a beta type engine (right)v.
We have chosen to build one beta and one gamma type Stirling engine. A beta
Stirling engine has a single power piston and a displacer mechanism. Gas is exchanged
between expansion and compression spaces through a temperature gradient. In gamma
Stirling engines, the power piston and displacer are in different cylinders. While gamma
Stirling engines require less of a temperature differential to function, they also produce
less specific power. Stirling engines of a variety of types, sizes, and qualities can be
purchased in kit form as well as fully assembled. We borrowed a low temperature
differential Stirling engine kit, which cost $98 for a small engine. The gamma type that
we built cost us $150 for materials and was designed to produce less than 10W of power.
5
Problem/Challenge Statement
In general, Stirling engines are not known for their overall general efficiency nor
cost-effectiveness. Our biggest challenge was to create a more efficient, working Stirling
engine out of readily available materials. It is particularly challenging to create a lowcost Stirling engine that runs on very low temperature differentials. We designed a
Stirling engine to run on the heat generated by hot compost. Hot compost can hit
maximum temperatures of around 160oFvi, giving us a temperature differential of
around 130-140 degrees F to work with. According to our research, an engine operating
with a temperature differential of ~130oF should yield a maximum thermal (Carnot)
efficiency of about 17.4%vii. Stirling engines have a high theoretical efficiency but
characteristically low efficiency in practice because it is difficult to maintain a large
enough temperature differential for the engine to function: either heat is lost to the
environment or the cool side of the engine heats up via conduction through the device. It
has been a challenge to reach or exceed even this percent efficiency using the naturally
occurring heat from organic matter decomposing.
Project Goals and Objectives
We wanted to pursue two consecutive physical prototypes, a mathematical model
and simulations for both fluid flow and heat transfer in the system. We completed a
sketch model of a beta type engine (with power output of less than 10W) using found
materialsviii, and used what we learned from that to make a larger Stirling. Then, using
the specifications and measurements from the gamma engine, we wanted to create
mathematical models of the system. Eventually we used simulations to derive what
changes could be made to the engine in order to increase its efficiency to cost ratio.
6
Materials and Methods
Engine Prototype 1: Beta Type Aluminum Can Engine
Figure 2: Our first “soda can” Stirling engine prototype.
To better understand the difficulties involved in building Stirling engines, we
began by constructing a beta type engine out of found materials according to the
instructions on Scraptopower.comix. This proof of concept allowed us to experiment
with the amount of heat needed to overcome the shaft resistance. Unfortunately,
imprecise components and assembly lead to major friction losses (primarily around the
crankshaft) that ultimately did not allow our beta type to generate enough power to have
the flywheel spin freely. However, we did notice that the flywheel spun more easily with
a temperature differential--i.e., when the hot end of the engine was placed in boiling
water--so it probably would have worked if our assembly had been more precise.
Experimentation with the beta type model highlighted the importance of assembling
and manufacturing our components carefully and within tolerances, especially the
crankshaft.
7
Engine Prototype 2: Gamma Type Machined Engine
For our second prototype, we built a gamma type Stirling engine roughly based
on plans from ridders.nu. We decided to use a known design to reduce the uncertainties
in our design process and allow us to focus on the analysis and characterization rather
than design of the system. Gamma type engines are similar to beta engines but have an
offset power piston, which simplifies them mechanically and reduces the weight of the
power piston.
This engine is constructed from two aluminum plates which form the top and
bottom edges of a large diameter cylinder. The plates are round because it is easier to
machine round parts to a higher tolerance. The two plates are also insulated from each
other by a plastic cylinder and plastic standoffs. Aluminum was chosen for its ease of
machining and high thermal conductivity. The displacement piston is constructed of a
round disk of balsa wood, chosen for its light weight and ease of machining. The
displacement piston is machined from graphite--selected for its low coefficient of
thermal expansion and self-lubricating properties--and slides in a glass tube. A pair of
aluminum plates support a crankshaft in ball bearings above the top plate of the system.
The crankshaft is manufactured from steel shaft brazed to connecting offset links.
Connecting rods attach the crankshaft to the power and displacement pistons. A CAD
render of our design (without flywheel and crankshaft) is shown below.
Figure 3: CAD render of our second prototype. The crankshaft and flywheel are hidden.
8
Analysis & Discussion
Figure 4: A simplified heat flow diagram of our Stirling engine design. Air is heated and cooled by the two
plates as it compresses and expands in the two chambers. The crankshaft and flywheel are hidden.
Fluids
A Stirling engine is a closed system, using the relationship between temperature and
pressure at a constant volume to derive work from a temperature difference. As such,
there is no bulk flow of fluid. The displacer piston shuttles fluid back and forth between
the hot and cold plates and fluid expands into the power piston, but there is no net flow
in and out.
To characterize the flow that we do have, we assumed that the engine is working
between 1 and 10 Hz. Assuming this frequency and taking into account the geometries
of our engine, the volume of fluid displaced is so small that the flow everywhere can be
taken as laminar. There are no doubt vortices caused by the geometry of the engine, but
the flow itself is not turbulent.
This is somewhat unfortunate because the boundary layer in laminar flow is much
thicker than in turbulent flow, reducing the heat transfer from a fluid to a wall. We want
to maximize the heat transfer between the plates and the working fluid, and therefore
make the flow along the plates turbulent. There are methods of roughing the surface just
enough to make the flow turbulent without creating pockets of stagnant fluid that could
be used to increase this heat flow.
9
Heat
The fluid flow in our system is not particularly interesting, but the meat of the
project lies in the ways that heat is transferred. The Stirling engine works off of a
temperature difference and five stages of heat transfer. As shown in Figure 5, the heat is
transferred from the source (in this case, a pot of boiling water) to the bottom plate of
the engine, to the working fluid, which is then forced to transfer heat to the top plate of
the engine, which transfers heat to the ice water bath. The total heat transfer through
the system is 307 Watts. This is not the amount of power that our engine outputs. That
would be determined by a series of ideal gas law and torque equations. Our calculations
to acquire these numbers can be found in the Appendix.
Figure 5: the six stages of heat transfer within the Stirling Engine.
Figure 6: a picture of the temperatures within our Stirling Engine under operating conditions.
Figure 6 is a picture taken by an IR camera displaying the temperatures of our
engine in Fahrenheit. The white oval near the bottom is the flame, the red area above it
10
the iron ring from the ring stand on which we were resting the engine, above that is the
green and blue bottom plate, then the spectacular gradient of the working fluid of the
engine, followed by the very cool upper plate. We hypothesize that the bottom plate is
not the same red as the ring stand and the bottom most air because the portion that the
camera can see is exposed to the ambient air and cools quickly. We assume that the
portion of the bottom plate closer to the flame is much warmer.
Dynamic Simulation
A dynamic simulation was made in MATLAB to help understand the behavior of our
engine. The simulation simplifies our system into a hot and cold chamber with a
displacer piston that moves the air betweenx. The cold chamber contains the region of
the power piston cylinder below the piston. The simulation has two state variables: the
rotational position and velocity of the crankshaft. These in turn are used to calculate the
positions of the pistons and the volumes of the two chambers. The system applies the
simplifying assumption that the gas in each chamber is of uniform temperature and uses
the ideal gas law to calculate the pressure of the two-volume system. This pressure
creates a force on the power piston which creates a moment on the crankshaft, causing
the system to continue spinning. Viscous damping is applied on the crankshaft to
counteract the force from the engine.
An animation was used to visualize the system. Due to the viscous damping, the system
asymptotically stabilizes at a rotational velocity and power output. The power output of
the simulated system is very low (< ¼ W). Note that this is an idealized version of the
system. As verified by thermal imaging, the actual engine has a temperature gradient
across the displacement cylinder, resulting in lower effective temperatures and less
pressure in the system.
The simulation was compared to the second prototype engine and matched up very well.
The geometry was equivalent to our prototype and when tested with a 100 K
temperature differential and a viscous damping coefficient of 0.1 Newton-seconds, the
system stabilized at a rotational speed of about 1 rotation per second, just as our
prototype did (Figure 7).
Using the simulation, we performed some system and geometry optimization studies.
We found that the larger the diameter of the power piston, the higher the power
produced. This makes sense as there is a larger area for the pressure to act on. When
taken to the limit of the diameter of the displacer piston, a beta type Stirling engine
results. However, this is a trade-off with the increased rotational mass of the crankshaft
caused by a larger power piston. Next, we looked into the effect of the contained gas on
performance. We found that when alternative gases are used, atmospheric pressure
11
overpowers the pressure within the engine and causes decreased performance. We also
found that the taller the displacement cylinder, the higher the power output of the
system. This aligns with the expected behavior as there is more gas present to expand
and contract. Furthermore, we found that the diameter of the displacer piston is not
especially critical to the performance of the system.
Figure 7: Stirling Engine Dynamic Simulation. Note that with a negative initial velocity, the system corrects
and stabilizes at a positive rotational velocity.
12
Simulink Modeling
We attempted to model heat flow, temperature and pressure using Simulink in
MATLAB. However, due to difficulty modeling thermo-fluid systems using the Simulink
software we did not achieve this goal. We did successfully complete a model showing
temperature changes as the fluid is heated and cooled via conduction and convection.
Figure 8: Simulink Diagram for Heat Flow in the Stirling Engine
Conclusions
Reflection on Goals and Objectives
In the end, we did accomplish our goal of creating two physical prototypes, a
mathematical model, and simulations for fluid flow and heat transfer. Though the first
prototype was not fully functional, we learned a lot for the next iteration. The gamma
engine helped us collect data regarding the heat transfer in our model; we were able to
show why the theoretical efficiency of a Stirling engine and the actual efficiency are so
different.
Lessons Learned
The power to cost ratio of Stirling engines is far too low for them to be a viable energy
source. Our Stirling engine produced a sub-watt power output, rendering it nearly
useless for any energy applications. On top of that, Stirling engines are precision
machines that rely on near-perfect machined parts to work. Because of this, a Stirling
engine would probably not be the right choice for power generation in the developing
world. Solar panels are impossible to repair on site, but they are becoming more and
more mass-produced, meaning their price is being driven down daily. A Stirling engine
13
would be near-impossible to service, and implausible to make locally with any desirable
success rate. The only way this could become a viable solution is if significant startup
capital was put into creating millions of small temperature difference Stirlings that
could be sold at low cost in developing countries.
Recommendations and Future Work
If anyone wanted to pursue this in the future, we would recommend optimizing the
geometries of the pistons, the insulative nature of the walls, and the thickness of the top
and bottom plates. It would be valuable to have a machine shop manufacture parts that
could reach the necessary tolerances. For us, air leakage around the power piston and
chamber was the difference between the engine working or not so it would be necessary
to have the Stirling engine precision machined.
Another future pursuit working off this model would be to collect experimental data
(pressure, temperature, displacer piston velocity, flywheel rpm, etc.) off of the engine to
compare with and validate simulation values.
14
Appendix: Equations
Equations of Heat Transfer in Transport Phenomena
Convection (Forced)
𝑅𝑒 → Pr → 𝑁𝑒 → β„Ž → 𝑄̇
πœŒπ‘‰π·
𝑅𝑒 =
πœ‡
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝜌 = 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑦, 𝑉 = π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘–π‘‘π‘¦ π‘œπ‘“ 𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑑, 𝐷 = π‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘”π‘‘β„Ž (π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑖𝑛 π‘‘β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’),
π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ πœ‡ = π‘‘π‘¦π‘›π‘Žπ‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘£π‘–π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘ π‘–π‘‘π‘¦
𝜈
πœ‡π‘
𝐾
Pr =
=
πœŒπ‘
𝐾
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑐 = 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 β„Žπ‘’π‘Žπ‘‘, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐾 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦
𝑁𝑒 = .664 𝑅𝑒 .5 π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ .33 𝐼𝑓 πΏπ‘Žπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘Žπ‘Ÿ
𝑁𝑒 = .037 𝑅𝑒 .8 π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ .33 𝐼𝑓 π‘‡π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘
𝑁𝑒𝐾
β„Ž=
𝐿
π‘„Μ‡π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£ = β„Žπ΄βˆ†π‘‡
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘„Μ‡π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ β„Žπ‘’π‘Žπ‘‘ π‘“π‘™π‘œπ‘€ π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›, 𝐴 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ βˆ†π‘‡ =
π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘‘π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘‘π‘–π‘“π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘›π‘π‘’
Convection (Natural or Free)
𝑄̇ = β„Žπ΄π‘  βˆ†π‘‡
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝐴𝑠 = π‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘’ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž
𝐾
𝑁𝑒
𝐿𝑐
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝐾 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦, 𝐿𝑐 = π‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘π‘‘β„Ž (π‘™π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘”π‘’π‘ π‘‘ π‘π‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘–π‘π‘™π‘’ π‘£π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘’π‘₯), π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑁𝑒
= π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑑 π‘›π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿ
𝑁𝑒 = .54π‘…π‘Ž .25
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘…π‘Ž = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘…π‘Žπ‘¦π‘™π‘’π‘–π‘”β„Ž π‘π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿ
π‘”π›½βˆ†π‘‡πΏπ‘ 3
π‘…π‘Ž =
π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ
𝜈2
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑔 = π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›, 𝛽 = 𝑒π‘₯π‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘”π‘Žπ‘  π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘“π‘“π‘–π‘π‘–π‘’π‘›π‘‘, 𝜈 =
π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘˜π‘–π‘’π‘›π‘’π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘£π‘–π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘ π‘–π‘‘π‘¦, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘π‘‘π‘™ π‘›π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿ
πœ‡πΆ
π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ =
𝐾
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝐢 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 β„Žπ‘’π‘Žπ‘‘, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐾 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦
𝐷
𝐿𝑐 (π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Ž π‘π‘¦π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿ) =
4
1
𝛽=
𝑇𝑓
βˆ†π‘‡
𝑇𝑓 =
2
β„Ž=
15
Conduction
1
β„Žπ΄
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£ = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑑𝑒𝑒 π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐴 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž
𝐿
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ =
𝐾𝐴
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘›π‘’ 𝑑𝑒𝑒 π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›, 𝐾 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝐴 =
π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž
∑𝑅 = π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£1 + π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ + π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£2
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£1 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑑𝑒𝑒 π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘›π‘’ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™, π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ =
π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑑𝑒𝑒 π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘‘β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘”β„Ž π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£2 =
π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑑𝑒𝑒 π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘› π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘œπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘™
𝑇1 − 𝑇2
π‘„Μ‡π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ =
∑𝑅𝑖
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£ =
Radiation
𝑄̇ = πœ€πœŽπ‘‡ 4 𝐴
π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ πœ€ = π‘’π‘šπ‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦ (0 π‘‘π‘œ 1), 𝜎 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘†π‘‘π‘’π‘“π‘Žπ‘› − π΅π‘œπ‘™π‘‘π‘§π‘šπ‘Žπ‘›π‘› π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘
For The Stirling Engine Project
Note: All rates of heat transfer are reduced to %17 to reflect the maximum Carnot efficiency of a
Stirling Engine.
Q1 - Forced Convection – Boiling Water
Assumptions:
ο‚· Temperature of boiling water = 99℃
ο‚· Velocity of boiling water = 1 π‘š/𝑠
ο‚· Depth of water = 𝐿𝑐 = 1π‘π‘š
ο‚· βˆ†π‘‡ across water = 1℃
ο‚· Diameter of pot = 25 π‘π‘š
Properties:
π‘˜π‘”
ο‚·
𝜌 = 959.1 π‘š3
ο‚·
πœ‡ = 2.85 × 10−4 π‘ƒπ‘Ž ∗ 𝑠
ο‚·
𝐢 = 3773 π‘˜π‘” 𝐾
ο‚·
𝐾 = .679 π‘šπΎ
𝐽
π‘Š
Values:
ο‚· 𝑅𝑒 = 33653 (π‘‡π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘)
16
ο‚·
ο‚·
π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ = 1.584
𝑁𝑒 = 180.47
ο‚·
β„Ž = 12263 π‘š2 𝐾
ο‚·
𝑄̇ = 102.25 π‘Š
π‘Š
Q2 – Conduction – Bottom Plate
Assumptions:
ο‚· Temperature of plate = 98℃
ο‚· The depth/thickness of the bottom plate = .012 m
Properties:
π‘Š
ο‚·
β„Žπ‘€ = 12253 π‘š2 𝐾
ο‚·
ο‚·
π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  = .07 π‘š
πΆβ„Žπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘ πΏπ‘’π‘›π‘”π‘‘β„Ž = 𝐿𝑐 = .012 π‘š
ο‚·
𝐾 = 240 π‘šπΎ
ο‚·
βˆ†π‘‡ = 50℃
π‘Š
Values:
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘Šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ = .005301
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = .003248
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ =
ο‚·
𝑄̇ = 15 π‘Š
𝐾
π‘Š
𝐾
π‘Š
𝐾
.5567
π‘Š
Q3 – Forced Convection – Hot Plate and Cold Working Fluid
Assumptions:
ο‚· πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘¦ π‘œπ‘“ π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿ = 2 𝐻𝑧
ο‚· Air is either the temperature of the top plate or the bottom plate, but not in between.
ο‚· The velocity along the plate is the same as the velocity of the air past the displacement
piston
ο‚· πΌπ‘›π‘›π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘¦π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿ = .054 π‘š
ο‚· π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘› = .053 π‘š
ο‚· We can perform lumped analysis despite 𝐡𝑖 = 84.876 @ 2℃
ο‚· βˆ†π‘‡ = 96 𝐾
ο‚· 𝐿𝑐 = π·π‘–π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ = .14 π‘š
Properties:
ο‚·
ο‚·
π‘£π‘œπ‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘‘
π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž∗π‘‘π‘–π‘šπ‘’
𝑀
πΎπ‘Žπ‘–π‘Ÿ = .0245 π‘šπΎ
𝑉=
πœ‹π‘Ÿ 2 β„Ž
= πœ‹∗(π‘Ÿ2 −π‘Ÿ22
2
1 )∗π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘œπ‘‘
= .485
π‘š
𝑠
17
𝑗
ο‚·
𝑐 = 1006 π‘˜π‘” 𝐾
ο‚·
𝜌 = 1.283 π‘š3
ο‚·
πœ‡ = 1.733 × 10−5 π‘šπ‘ 
π‘˜π‘”
π‘˜π‘”
Values:
ο‚·
.33
.037 𝑐 π‘˜
𝑄̇ = πœ‡.466 (𝐿
.66
𝜌 𝑉 βˆ†π‘‡
.2
𝜌
𝑐 𝑉)
= 85.62 π‘Š
Q4 – Forced Convection – Cold Plate and Hot Working Fluid
Assumptions:
ο‚· πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘¦ π‘œπ‘“ π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿ = 2 𝐻𝑧
ο‚· Air is either the temperature of the top plate or the bottom plate, but not in between.
ο‚· The velocity along the plate is the same as the velocity of the air past the displacement
piston
ο‚· πΌπ‘›π‘›π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘¦π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿ = .054 π‘š
ο‚· π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘› = .053 π‘š
ο‚· We can perform lumped analysis despite 𝐡𝑖 = 65.94 @ 98℃
ο‚· βˆ†π‘‡ = 96 𝐾
ο‚· 𝐿𝑐 = π·π‘–π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ = .14 π‘š
Properties:
ο‚·
ο‚·
ο‚·
ο‚·
ο‚·
π‘£π‘œπ‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’ π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘‘
πœ‹π‘Ÿ22 β„Ž
=
2
π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž∗π‘‘π‘–π‘šπ‘’
πœ‹∗(π‘Ÿ2 −π‘Ÿ12 )∗π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘œπ‘‘
𝑀
πΎπ‘Žπ‘–π‘Ÿ = .0315 π‘šπΎ
𝑗
𝑐 = 1006 π‘˜π‘” 𝐾
π‘˜π‘”
𝜌 = .9507 3
π‘š
π‘˜π‘”
πœ‡ = 2.172 × 10−5 π‘šπ‘ 
𝑉=
= .485
π‘š
𝑠
Values:
ο‚·
.33
.037 𝑐 π‘˜
𝑄̇ = πœ‡.466 (𝐿
.66
𝑐
𝜌 𝑉 βˆ†π‘‡
𝜌 𝑉).2
= 71.69 π‘Š
Q5 – Conduction – Top Plate
Assumptions:
ο‚· Same exposure area to water as bottom plate
ο‚· π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘Šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘  𝑖𝑛 𝑄̇2
18
Properties:
π‘Š
ο‚·
𝐾 = 240 π‘šπΎ
ο‚·
ο‚·
βˆ†π‘‡ = 96℃
𝐿𝑐 = .005 π‘š
Values:
𝐾
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π‘Šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ = .005301 π‘Š
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = .00135 π‘Š
ο‚·
π‘…π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘£π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ = .5567
ο‚·
𝑄̇ = 28.9 π‘Š
𝐾
𝐾
π‘Š
Q6 – Natural Convection – Ice Water
Assumptions:
ο‚· Water is at 1˚C
𝐷
4
ο‚·
𝐿𝐢 =
ο‚·
ο‚·
ο‚·
Pr 𝑖𝑠 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’ π‘Žπ‘  𝑖𝑛 𝑄̇1 = 1.584
βˆ†π‘‡ = 1℃
π‘…π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  = .07 π‘š
= .035 π‘š
Properties:
π‘Š
π‘šπΎ
π‘š
9.8 𝑠2
ο‚·
𝐾 = .679
ο‚·
𝑔=
ο‚·
𝜈 = 1.787 × 10−6
π‘š2
𝑆
Values:
ο‚· π‘…π‘Ž = 4.168 × 108 (π‘‡π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘›π‘‘)
ο‚· 𝑁𝑒 = 77.15
π‘Š
ο‚·
β„Ž = 1496 π‘š2 𝐾
ο‚·
𝑄̇ = 3.82 π‘Š
Total Heat Transfer
π‘„Μ‡π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ = 307 π‘Š = 3 π‘˜π‘Š
19
Kongtragool, Bancha, and Somchai Wongwises. "A Review of Solar-powered Stirling engines
and Low Temperature Differential Stirling engines." Science Direct (n.d.): n. pag. Web.
<http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sustainable/refs/solar/Stirling.pdf>.
i
ii
Stancich, Rikki. "What happened to Tessera Solar's projects?." CSP Today. FC Business
Intelligence Limited, 4 Mar 2011. Web. 18 Dec 2013. <http://social.csptoday.com/markets/whathappened-tessera-solars-projects>.
iii
"Solar Dish Engine." Solar Power And Chemical Energy Systems. The International Energy
Agency. Web. 18 Dec 2013.
<http://www.solarpaces.org/CSP_Technology/docs/solar_dish.pdf>.
iv
Gamma Engine: http://www.geo.unizh.ch/~iwoodh/gamma.gif
v
Beta Engine: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v37/v37n2/images/foster2.jpeg
"Compost Fundamentals" Washington State University. Web. 22 Sep. 2013.
<http://whatcom.wsu.edu/ag/compost/fundamentals/needs_temperature.htm>
vi
vii
[i]
“Quick And Easy Stirling engine On Coffee Warmer”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTFfZk7Bg90
viii
ix
(www.scraptopower.co.uk/can-stirling/make-a-coke-can-stirling-engine)
Inspiration for simulation taken from Ohio University Stirling Cycle Machine Analysis class
webpage <www.ohio.edu/mechanical/stirling/isothermal/isothermal.html>.
x
Download