Effects Quality of Vision (Aberrations)

advertisement

Integration of Aberrometry and Topography with the

i

Trace System

July 2005

Joe S. Wakil, MD -

Tracey Technologies, LLC

EyeSys Vision, Inc.

Founding Technology

Developers:

Vasyl Molebny, DSc

Kiev, Ukraine

Ioannis Pallikaris, MD

Crete, Greece

Canadian & Swedish Governments

Why Aberroscopy?

Current Laser Technology Permits One to

Go Beyond Correction of Sphere and

Astigmatism

You Can Now Address Your Patient’s Quality of Vision

High Order Aberrations Define

Quality of Vision

Why Ray Tracing?

Because… the Eye is NOT a Telescope!

Pupil Size:

Accommodation:

Effects Refraction (ex. Night Myopia)

Refraction is NOT a FIXED Number!

Effects Refraction (Instrument Myopia)

Tear Film: Effects Quality of Vision (Aberrations)

Where are the Sources of

Aberrations?

How do they change with Surgery?

Cornea: Astigmatism (Irreg.), Sph & other HOA

Lens: Astigmatism, Coma & other HOA

The Eye is NOT a Telescope

EYE

• Off-Axis design

• No magnification

• Variable aperture

• Variable detector res.

• Accommodation

• Changing fixation

• Brain image processing

• Nature-made

TELESCOPE

• On-Axis design

• High magnification

• Fixed aperture

• Constant detector res.

• No accommodation

• Fixed alignment

• Digital image processing

• Man-made

Significant Higher Order Aberrations

Trefoil Coma

Spherical

Aberration

Aberrometer/Wavefront

Technologies

• Hartmann-Shack Lenslet Array

• Tscherning Aberrometer

• Differential Skiascopy

• Ray Tracing

Features:

-Rapid, point by point, IR measurement no data confusion

-Pupillometry with auto-tracking/capture

-Programmable sampling (256 pts.) in any pupil up to 8mm

-Open Field Fixation – avoid instrument myopia and measure Accommodation

-Corneal Topography integration – able to measure Lens Aberrations

Hartmann Shack

Hartmann Shack

Hartmann-Shack

Wavefront Sensor

H/S Photo of patient with tight eye lid courtesy David Williams

Tscherning

Disadvantages of H-S and

Tscherning

• Measures All Points at Once -

Data Confusion, Compromised Resolution

• Limited Dynamic Range –

Cannot Measure Highly Irregular Eyes

• Highly Sensitive to Noise –

Slow, Requires Multiple Scans

• Expensive Components –

High Cost to Purchase and Repair

• H-S Measures Reverse Aberrations –

Not Physiologic with Real Vision especially for High Orders in Accomodation

• Tscherning Needs 2-D Imaging of Retina -

Additional noise and errors

Differential Skiascopy

Disadvantages of Differential

Skiascopy

• Does NOT Measure Skew Aberrations –

Inaccurate WaveFront especially for Trefoil,

Quadrafoil, etc.

• Measures Multiple Points at Once (slit) and only in Perpendicular Direction -

Limited WF measurement (axial bias)

• No Open Field Fixation –

Problem of instrument myopia in young patients

Total Ocular Aberrations

Corneal

Aberrations

Internal

Optics

Aberrations

Total Ocular

Aberrations

*Measuring Corneal Aberration without Lens or Total Aberration is of Questionable Value

The i Trace

Principles of Tracey

• Programmable thin beam ray tracing measuring forward aberrations of the eye

• Rapid sequential measurement of data points over entire entrance pupil (<50ms)

• Localization of each reflected retinal spot

• Integration of individual retinal spots to form Point Spread Function (PSF)

• Analysis of PSF for higher order aberrations and other data formats

Programmable Data Sample Points

Multiplying the Number of Sites

Higher Local Density of Sites

Overlay of Two Sets of Site Configuration

Refractive Error Measurements

Myopia Hyperopia

Retinal Spot Diagram/Point

Spread Function

Data Displays

Retinal Spot Diagram

Refraction Map

40

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

-20 -10 0

X, µm

10 20

Ablation Map

Wavefront Map

Tracey’s Key Advantage:

Rapid, point-by-point analysis of

256 data points avoids data confusion associated with simultaneous data measurements, therefore, all eyes

(highly irregular) can be measured. All points in any pupil size (2-8mm) each with full dynamic range (+/- 15 D).

NO COMPROMISES!

Baylor Clinical Study

(100 eyes) by Doug Koch, MD

+7D

-13D

Validation Studies

Three independent studies of

Tracey vs. Manifest Refraction

• Koch et al - 100 eyes

• Slade et al - 42 eyes

• Schalhorn et al - 106 eyes

Results

• Accuracy to manifest <0.12 D

• Reproducibility <0.12 D

The i Trace

Normal Eye

Irregular Eye

UCVA vs BCVA

Post

LASIK

Full Corneal Topography

Full Corneal Topography

Keratoconu s

Normal

iTrace Measures

Accommodation Mechanism

Very Spherical

Accommodation

Horizontal Cyl

Vertical Cyl

Sphere

Coma

Variations in

Mapping

Accommodative

Power in the

Natural

Crystalline Lens as

Measured by iTrace

Crystalens Accommodative Arching

73 Year Old Male

Overall Refraction change is 0.5D but Central

Cylinder 2.5 D adds Depth of Field to

Enhance Accommodative Effect

MultiFocal IOL Analysis with i Trace

• PSF Analysis

• Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)obust Aberrometer

 Pupil Dependent Analysis

 Multi-Zone Refraction Analysis

• Retinal Spot Diagram

 Conoid of Sturm Dynamic Analysis

• Complete Corneal Topography Analysis

• Separates Corneal from Total Aberrations Resulting in

• Measures Accommodation

Multifocal Acrylic IOL

Alcon ReStor Lens

Monofocal Acrylic IOL

Alcon SA-60

Normal Eye

+0.5 D Hyperope

i Trace

Summary

• Robust Aberrometer

 Measures Spatially Resolved Refraction and Aberrations for ALL eyes – including highly irregular

 Measurement Zone from 2.0 to 8.0 mm (Flexible)

 Multi-Zone Refraction Analysis

 Can do Over-Refraction with Contact Lenses or

Spectacles

 Measures Psuedophakic eyes

• Complete Corneal Topography Analysis

• Separates Corneal from Total Aberrations Resulting in

• Measures Accommodation

• Accurate Pupil Size Measurement

Thank you for your attention.

Download