PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
FALL 2013 PILOT DATA REPORT
PA12-40 REMEDIATION CONFERENCE
MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE
APRIL 11, 2014
AYNSLEY D IAMOND , E D .D.
T RANSFER
AND
A RTICULATION P OLICY P ROGRAM M ANAGER
B ENJAMIN K LIMCZAK , M.S.
S ENIOR R ESEARCH A NALYST
CONTEXT/ GOALS
Public Act 12-40
Multiple Measures of Student Assessment
Assessment outcomes determine student placement in either:
•
Embedded
•
Intensive
•
College readiness program (transitional) instruction
Persistence and Retention
Student Success
WHAT WE DID
136 Pilots in Fall 2013 semester
Variation of Method and Design and Instruction
Trends, Forecasting and Planning are not to be
inferred from this data
WARNING - These data are only for PILOTS!
FALL 2013 UNDERGRADUATE
ENROLLMENT – OVERALL & REMEDIAL
Institution
Undergraduate
Enrollment
Enrollment in Remedial
Course
(English and/or Math)
#
#
Percentage of
Remedial
Enrollment
CSU & COSC
28,699
1,238
9%
CCC
56,976
12,981
91%
ConnSCU
85,675
14,219
Fall 2013
CCC STUDENTS REGISTRATION
FOR REMEDIAL COURSES
FALL TERMS:
New Students
Fall
Term
CCC
Enrollment
2011 THROUGH 2013
Other Student Types
Registered for
Remedial
Course
#
%
CCC
Enrollment
Registered for
Remedial Course
#
%
All Students
CCC
Enrollment
Registered for
Remedial Course
#
%
2013
11,491
6,836
59%
45,485
6,145
14%
56,976
12,981
23%
2012
11,765
7,607
65%
46,463
6,935
15%
58,228
14,542
25%
2011
11,678
7,791
67%
45,474
7,109
16%
57,152
14,900
26%
WITHDRAWAL RATES
(INCLUDING FALL 2012 CONVENTIONAL DATA)
20%
15%
15%
12%
11%
10%
7%
13%
12%
9%
8%
5%
0%
Conventional
(Fall 2012)
Conventional
(Fall 2013)
Embedded
(Fall 2013)
Intensive
(Fall 2013)
English
Math
NEW STUDENTS COMPLETION STATUS
(ENGLISH AND/OR MATH)
Enrolled
Successful
Course Type
#
#
Success
Rate
Remedial - Embedded
758
536
71%
Remedial - Intensive
699
462
66%
Remedial - Conventional
6,340
4,718
74%
College Level
4,484
3,825
85%
AVERAGE GRADE POINT – REMEDIAL COURSES
(INCLUDING FALL 2012 CONVENTIONAL DATA)
4.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.6
1.6
2.0 1.8
2.0
1.6
1.0
0.0
Conventional Conventional
(Fall 2012)
(Fall 2013)
English
2.0
2.0
Math
1.6
1.6
Embedded
(Fall 2013)
1.9
1.8
Intensive
(Fall 2013)
2.0
1.6
What happened to
remedial mathematics
students in Spring
2014?
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Did not register
40%
30%
20%
10%
13%
12%
13%
Embedded
Intensive
Conventional
0%
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Repeated
Did not register
50%
40%
30%
26%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
Embedded
Intensive
Conventional
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
70%
61%
78%
60%
87%
Did not repeat
Repeated
Did not register
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Embedded
Intensive
Conventional
What happened to
remedial English
students in Spring
2014?
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Did not register
40%
30%
20%
10%
16%
8%
9%
Embedded
Intensive
0%
Conventional
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Repeated
Did not register
50%
40%
30%
24%
20%
10%
0%
2%
0%
Embedded
Intensive
Conventional
What happened in spring?
100%
90%
80%
60%
70%
60%
92%
89%
Did not repeat
Repeated
Did not register
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Embedded
Intensive
Conventional
WHAT’S NEXT
• Disaggregate data to determine outliers
• Institutional model analysis
• RFQ – independent analysis of models; qualitative
component
• Summer 2013 Evaluate transitional levels
SOURCE INFORMATION:
Prepared by:
ConnSCU, Board of Regents for Higher
Education - Office of Policy and Research
Data Source:
Institutional Research Database
IRDB Query: IRDB_RemedialEnrollment_V20140407