The Use of Massive Open Online Courses at Howard University Prepared For Wayne Fredrick President Howard University Washington, DC 20059 Prepared by Timothy Johnson Taskforce Subcommittee Chair Washington, DC November 13, 2013 4708 5th Street Nw Apt# 403 Washington, DC 20011 Wayne Fredrick President 2400 Sixth Street NW Washington, DC 20059 Dear President Wayne, Enclosed is the report we agreed to be submitted in September if Howard University should implement a Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) program. MOOCs can: Allow those who want to take a class, but can’t leave the house access to the information Improve students work performance Keeps the school technologically up to date I recommend Howard University and the division of Information Technology do further research on MOOCs. Colleges such as UNC, Stanford University, MIT, Duke and Yale have already implemented their version of a MOOC program. The program has been beneficial to students as well as faculty alike. Introduction What are MOOCs? Massive Open Online Courses, also called MOOCs, are an online network of accessible courses for continuous learning. From research found on www.moocs.com: Non-degree online courses with open unlimited global enrollment to anyone who desires to learn, and regardless of their current educational level. MOOCs are only accessible via the web. MOOCs can offer multiple of courses and degrees that are just a click away. How did it get started? As cited by Juliana Marques who wrote the article A Short History of MOOCs and Distance Learning. MOOCs first began in the United Kingdom in 1969. The name of the MOOC was Open University. This University was the answer to the long distance capabilities to still pursue and education via the web. MOOCs expanded quickly in Europe and the United States. Australia was able to use this program to access information from London School of Economics, which was one of the first in the United Kingdom to now many schools have implemented their on version of MOOCS to aid their students and share knowledge to those who want to access it. Problems/Disadvantages: During the implementation of MOOCs, there have been a few criticisms to whether the program is an effective learning experience. Many faculty and administrators have reviewed other programs and have given them their thoughts. Associate Director Doug Holton of Center for teaching and learning excellence at EmbryRiddle Aeronautical University wrote apiece entitled. What’s the “problem” with MOOCs? Here’s what he said about some of the MOOC’s that are available: “Khan Academy, the organization is unclear and it lacks sufficient learner support. The videos aren’t informed by research and theory on how people learn, and this may diminish the effectiveness of his videos. He could make the physics videos more effective for example if he directly addressed student misconceptions in the videos. It doesn’t appear that any of the videos ever get revised or updated.” (May 2012) Khan Academy is a MOOC, where you can learn Physics (as stated above) and computer coding. This MOOC was introduces in 2006 by educator Salman Khan, a graduate of MIT and Harvard Business School. The problem here is that the website lacks interaction with students and hinders effective academic growth. According to Dr. Jill Rooney, MOOCs have yet to allow “Star Students” to be recognized for their efforts. Number 4 in her article states as follows: “4. No individual distinctions: Professor David Youngberg of Bethany College has raised an important problem with MOOCs, which he realized when he took a course offered through Udacity himself: “star students can’t shine.” He worried about the ramifications this has for a student’s future: “In traditional academe, I know my best students well enough to write recommendations describing their personalities and accomplishments in detail. Online anonymity results in references that mean virtually nothing.” This is certainly an important consideration, because MOOCs are often promoted as ways for employees to gain more knowledge, but I also think that MOOCs present problems for students who rely on outside motivation and require ongoing feedback and positive encouragement. There is not as much chance for this in a MOOC as there is in a traditional course. This may be why MOOCs have such a high drop-out rate. MOOCs might do better if there was a mechanism in place to reward students for their achievements.”(2012) This should be kept in mind when it comes to creating a MOOC for Howard University. Students who live off campus, that have to find a way to create a secure connection to the Howard network. A lot of students who work and go to school don’t really have the luxury some nights to come onto Howard’s campus to connect to the network. Another example is, the University of California after opening their first set up MOOCs they ran into a slight snag. The article by Nanette Asimov entitled UC Online Courses Fails To Attract More Than A Few Students makes a good point about starting a MOOC. According to the Associated Press, about 1,700 UC students have signed up for one of the 14 courses offered, but they've attracted a grand total of five nonUC students, despite $4.3 million spent on marketing. That much money could have been put into the full functioning and operation like coursera. They have students pay about 1,400 to almost 3,000 dollars for a class. What if this is not in the tuition and fees part of the student’s bill? The article in the Star Tribune, Minneapolis entitled: Should College be a Remote Experience gave a good point that I believe is pressing for professors: “MOOCs could eventually reduce opportunities for college professors, marginalize smaller or lesser colleges, lower the overall quality of learning and eliminate the experience of college life for many.” (Dec 2012) No one teacher can teach a whole section to 500+ students using MOOCs. It not academically reasonable and cheating other experienced professors to do what they love and that is to teach. Would you allow a professor, one professor to teach a class only using MOOC? Would you want to limit the teacher student communication gap even further? Who wants to live a college life on a computer for 4 years of college? There are many flaws and disadvantages but what about advantages? Advantages: Students in this generation always have their smartphones, tablets, and Laptops with them everywhere they go. They can access MOOCs right from their devices anywhere at anytime. Some students don’t have the opportunity to take a class which wasn’t and isn’t available because the classroom cap is filled. A MOOCs course would solve this. As Cited in, Higher Education; Open Online classes transform colleges by Laura Diamond of the Atlanta-Journal Constitution, “These online courses are revolutionizing higher education as they give students free access worldwide to content and faculty offered by elite colleges.” (Dec. 2012). The slideshow on http://www.slideshare.net/gsiemens/designing-and-running-a-mooc made a great point on slide 14 of 41: that learners expected to create, grow, expand domain and share personal sense making through artifact-creation. (Sept. 2012). Meaning people learn by sharing what they have done, and express themselves through digital creation that they can’t say in face-to-face atmospheres. MOOCs are intended to instruct and help the students, who sign up to learn on their own. The videos depending on who you’ve signed up with udacity, Edx, etc, have different formats in which they provide information. For example, I signed up for Khan Academy last year (2012). The website first showed Sal Khan, the creator giving an intro video. Within this short introductory video he shared that a pre-test will be taken to customize around the student’s needs. I wanted to learn about computer coding and sequencing. I looked at the first video or course they provided on coding a circle and square. This is similar to a math course where they introduce something new to you and give you a way to work it out on your own. This still gives the students the learning part of the course and builds around the students needs (Khanacademy.org) With access to the information students will never have the excuse that they didn't have it or get the information. The MOOCS to students is like a extra life in Super Mario Bros. on the Super Nintendo console. Even if they were late to class they still have a way to get the information in on time with some points off depending on the teacher. In Laura Diamond’s article, stood out as a great advantage not just to students but to professors alike. The article states, “Students could go to a location for a proctored exam. Or, when students take tests on their computers they must show ID and keep the system's video camera running.” (Higher Education: Open Online Classes transform college, Dec 2012) This is a secure way for professors to use the integrity policy on students using Moocs exams. On each laptop is a webcam. This webcam when taking an exam is on the whole time during the exam. This advantage for professors is to put the name and ID with the face of the student. This is a great way for: Students to get recognition for their work Teacher being able to put face to names Avoid plagiarism Many courses at Howard University are hybrid courses. Classes that are both online and face-to-face. The advantages to this style of courses allow the student to learn on their own while the teacher can prepare for the next class accordingly via the online assignments and in class exercises. For example, Grammar Review for Japanese Minor was a Hybrid Course. In this course some days were in class others were online assignments from the previous class. For online quizzes the students have to sign in with their student login. From what the students have said that class was a challenge and was also a new experience. (Johnson) As Laura Diamond’s article states, “Tech and Emory are part of Coursera, a forprofit company that offers more than 200 courses from more than 30 universities. Two other large players are Udacity, also a private company, and edX, a nonprofit started by Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.” (“Higher Education 2012). Howard University could benefit from a partnership with one of the leading MOOCs or start their own. Beneficial to the students could drop the tuition fees down by a couple thousand depending on investors and those who sign up for classes. It's a partnership with other schools as well. Georgia Tech and Emory University in the South have partnered with Coursera to build a very workable relationship in sharing resources. Building this relationship with our own consortium members could benefit students from traveling long distances, if they don’t have to. With the exception of exams and finals of course. Recommendation I recommend that Howard University create their own MOOCs network. Students who study together grow together. Here are the basic recommendations: Form a secure accessible network Accessible sections and courses Build a hybrid curriculum Open to change the way you teach Don’t cut faculty Give accessible sources via the Web Give real life scenarios in the examples Conclusion All of these recommendations will give the MOOCs at Howard University the edge it needs to build and lead the students into a new wave of learning. Allowing them to be tech savvy and learn critical skills as this world head towards a new age of academic learning. This will be bring Howard’s Information Technology program a boost in a hands on experience dealing with online learning and online sharing of ideas among the top IT specialist in the United States. I’m sure that MOOCs will be very influential to the campuses growth. References Lewin, Tamar: A rush to reinvent learning; Students flock to Web, but a model that pays the bills remains elusive, The International Herald Tribune, January 8, 2012. Head, Karen: For Whom is College Being Reinvented?; ‘Disruptions’ have the buzz but may put higher education out of reach for those students likely to benefit the most. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Dec. 17, 2012. Diamond, Laura: Higher Education; Open online classes transform colleges. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Laura Diamond, Dec. 27, 2012. Host Simon, Scott and Prof. Devlin Keith Math En Masse: Teaching Online for Free, National Public Radio, November 24, 21012 Ross, Jenna Should college be a remote experience? Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Dec. 19, 2012. Asimov, Nanette: UC’s online course fail test luring outsiders; EDUCATION, The San Francisco Chronicle, Nanette Asimov, January 8, 2013. Khan Academy www.Khanacademy.org November 20, 2013 Udacity www.udacity.org Novermber 23, 2013 Marques, Juliana, A Short History of MOOCs and Distance Learning: http://moocnewsandreviews.com/a-short-history-of-moocs-and-distancelearning/#ixzz2lgHZ2Xe1 April 17, 2013 Rooney ,Jill, DR : 4 Biggest Problems with MOOCs http://www.onlinecolleges.net/2012/10/17/the-4-biggest-problems-withmoocs/(2013) Holton, Doug: What’s the “problem” with MOOCs? http://edtechdev.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/whats-the-problem-withmoocs/ May 4th 2012