Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Configuration Steering Board
Template Charts Program Title
for Annual Review/Event
Driven CSBs
…
Rank, Name
Office Symbol
Updated July 2014
1
“Why We Are Here Today”

Information to include:
 Reference Tech Baseline
 List of Deltas/Changes Approved by PEO or SAE
 Cost of Deltas/Changes to Program and AF Enterprise
 Rationale for Deltas/Changes
 Proposed recommendations to change the program

BLUF Example:
 “Program” Increment III (98% expended)
 No significant development activity remaining
 “Program” Inc IV (focus of CSB)
 No funding vs requirements mismatches in program profile
 No change in requirements since Inc IV MS B, Apr 11
 Potential descoping options
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
2
Interrelationships, Dependencies and
Synchronization with Complementary
Systems
CH-53X
GCCS-M
JPALS
UH-1/AH-1
(upgrades)
LHA(R)
DCGS-N
JHSV
CEC
JSF
SSDS Mk 2
MH-60S
SSDS P3I
MPF(F)
MV22
Solid denotes current system
No known issues affecting inter-related programs
Dash denotes future system
Arrow to LHA(R) denotes supports LHA(R)
Arrow from LHA(R) denotes LHA(R) supports
Indicates program are interdependent
3
Resolvable interface issues affecting programs
Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
Program X Schedule
Sample Chart
Highlight Critical Path
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
IOC
MDD
FY11
FY12
FY13
FDDR
MAIS List
Milestones
FY10
AFRB
FOC
RIT
Requirements
Review/Management Board
ICD
Requirements
Annual
X-Plan
System/Architecture Studies
Design & Integration
Acquisition
Test & Evaluation
OUE
OT&E
Procurement
Operations & Support
Strategic & focused on Milestones and critical events between milestones.
Must communicate schedule changes
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
4
Funding vs. Requirement
Assessment
Acquisition to O&S Cost Ratio
Total Required Acq (BY$M):
4,456
Total Required O&S (BY$M):
10,358
Program Funding & Quantities
($ in Millions / Then Year)
RDT&E
Prior $ (PB 14)
Current $ (PB 15)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
Prior
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
(BY yyyy)
PAUC:
APUC:
FY18
FY19
Curr Est
55.7M
50.4M
D Current
+4.6%
-3.2%
D Original
+10.2%
+60.2%
FY15-19 To Comp Prog Total
Prim ary Line Ite m s : APPN 0400D - BA 7 - PE 1160403BB; APPN 1319N - BA 5 - PE 0604262N; APPN 3600F - BA 5 - PE 0401318F
108.0
108.0
108.0
-
PROCUREMENT
Prior $ (PB 14)
Current $ (PB 15)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
FY13
30%
70%
32.4
30.0
(2.4)
32.4
(2.4)
44.2
43.1
(1.1)
44.2
(1.1)
45.1
45.6
0.5
45.6
-
37.9
38.3
0.4
46.0
(7.7)
12.4
12.5
0.1
15.0
(2.5)
5.3
5.4
0.1
6.5
(1.1)
3.2
3.2
4.0
(0.8)
103.9
105.0
1.1
117.1
(12.1)
-
288.5
286.1
(2.4)
301.7
(15.6)
Prim ary Line Ite m s : APPN 0300D - BA 2 - BLI 1000CV2200; APPN 1506N - BA 1 - BLI 0164; APPN 3010F - BA 4 - BLI V022A0
-
99.9
99.5
(0.4)
99.9
(0.4)
MILCON
150.4
148.2
(2.2)
150.4
(2.2)
200.2
203.1
2.9
203.1
-
304.8
309.2
4.4
312.3
(3.1)
618.6
522.9
(95.7)
528.1
(5.2)
627.6
530.5
(97.1)
535.8
(5.3)
360.1
538.1
178.0
543.5
(5.4)
2,111.3
2,103.8
(7.6)
2,122.8
(19.0)
2,257.3
1,954.5
(302.8)
1,974.1
(19.5)
4,618.9
4,306.0
(313.0)
4,347.1
(41.2)
Prim ary Line Ite m s : APPN 0500D - BA 1 - PE 1140494BB; APPN 1205N - BA 1 - PE 0204696N
Prior $ (PB 14)
Current $ (PB 15)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
-
-
-
6.1
6.1
6.1
-
SYSTEM O&M2
Prior $ (PB 14)
Current $ (PB 15)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
1.3
1.4
0.1
1.4
-
1.6
1.7
0.1
1.7
-
-
2.1
2.0
(0.1)
2.0
-
2.3
2.1
(0.2)
2.1
-
3.0
3.0
3.0
-
9.0
8.8
(0.2)
8.8
-
15.3
12.6
(2.7)
12.6
-
25.6
22.8
(2.8)
22.8
-
5,904.8
(5,904.8)
235.5
255.6
20.1
6,160.4
(5,904.8)
2,272.6
1,967.1
(305.5)
7,891.4
(5,924.3)
5,168.5
4,870.5
(298.0)
10,832.0
(5,961.5)
Prim ary Line Ite m s : APPN 0100D - BA 1 - PE 1120172BB; APPN 1106N - BA 1 - PE 0206312M
8.3
8.3
8.3
-
10.4
11.4
1.0
11.4
-
26.5
29.2
2.7
29.2
-
37.8
41.6
3.8
41.6
-
55.0
60.5
5.5
60.5
-
91.4
98.6
7.2
98.6
-
369.2
376.6
7.4
387.4
(10.8)
670.9
579.0
(91.9)
586.7
(7.7)
690.2
598.5
(91.7)
604.9
(6.4)
457.7
642.9
185.2
649.1
(6.2)
221.1
241.2
20.1
241.2
-
TOTAL
Prior $ (PB 14)
Current $ (PB 15)
Delta $ (Current - Prior)
Required1 $
Delta $ (Current - Required)
QUANTITIES
108.0
108.0
108.0
-
138.4
135.6
(2.8)
138.4
(2.8)
204.2
201.0
(3.2)
204.3
(3.3)
257.3
261.8
4.5
261.8
-
2,445.3
2,458.8
13.5
2,489.9
(31.1)
3
Prior Qty (PB 14)
0
2
3
4
6
12
12
0
34
41
80
Current Qty (PB 15)
0
2
3
4
6
10
10
10
40
35
80
Delta Qty (Current - Prior)
0
0
0
0
0
(2)
(2)
10
6
(6)
0
Required1 Qty
0
2
3
4
6
9
9
9
37
38
80
Delta Qty (Current - Required)
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
(3)
0
Note 1. Requirement Source: [e.g., OSD CAPE ICE, Oct 2012]
Note 2. O&M requirement assumes [e.g., a service life to 2035; includes ctr field mx, petro/oil/lube, spare/repair parts, depot mx, sustaining engineering & software mx.]
This line does not include of $8.3M (FY15-19) of Acquisition-related O&M for program office expenses.
Note 3. Quantities in FY13-14 are funded with RDT&E
version PB 15.1
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
Requirements Changes (+/-)
since last CSB
New / Refined
Requirements
Threshold /
Objective
Rationale for
New Req.
Current Est.
Weight
7500 lbs / 6600 lbs
AMC/A3/5 identified new
weight requirement
updated to allow
transport in …
7650 lbs
Resolution
7 cm / 5 cm
New threat identified by
xxxx and being worked
through AFROC that …
6.8 cm
Etc.
Do not limit to just new KPPs/KSAs or changes to
CDD/CPD. Also, include updates or refinement to
requirements identified by the User or other
organizations
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
6
Requirements/Affordability
Analysis

Programs need to provide information on any
design/requirements trades that have been conducted to evaluate
cost/schedule vs. performance
 CSB may review draft requirement documents
 State your affordability goals (see 5000.02 encl 2-7)
 Include charts depicting curves showing how cost/schedule
vary with performance/capability and showing where the
current requirement/design parameter falls on the curve

Address any issues regarding how needed Military
Utility/Capability play in the design/requirements trades
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
7
Potential Descoping Options
Option
User Capability
Assessment and
Perf Impact
Defer Mode S
Low-to-med impact in FY08-13
timeframe: Risks denial to
European airspace
Reduce sensor
resolutions by
50%
Impact to
remaining
program
Investment
to date
Savings
No impact
$12M spent of an
estimated $36M
effort
$24M Total:
$3M FY08
$8M FY09
$10M FY10
$3M FY11
Changes critical
$3M spent in risk
path to xxxx;
reduction; total
reduces schedule
effort estimated at
risk by four
$87M
months
Provide three or four options based on input from user on
requirements, impact to programs ability execute remaining
program, and % of costs already invested
Med impact in FY10-11 and
High impact in FY12-21:
Inability to …
$84M Total:
$2M FY08
$7M FY09
$15M FY10
$23M FY11
$28M FY12
$9M FY13
Etc.
* What would program
descope to address a
FUNDING CUT
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
8
“Issues Opportunity”

This is an opportunity to communicate/discuss
program issues with the SAE
 Discuss affordability and requirements

Discuss any issues that are of a particular concern to
the PEO and PM (examples might be)

OSD Oversight issues
 Funding instability


Technical transition issues
Congressional Interest

New User unfunded requirements/refinements
Integrity - Service - Excellence
See Notes Page
9
Backup Slides
AS REQUIRED
Integrity - Service - Excellence
10
Program Name
Performance (KPPs & select KSAs)
Top Cost Drivers
1.
2.
KPP 1
A, % of program cost
G
KPP 2
B , % of program cost
Y
KPP 3
3.
C , % of program cost
4.
D , % of program cost
5.
E , % of program cost
G
KSA 2
KSA 5
N – no capability
Technology Readiness Assessment
R
N
T
T – Threshold
O
O - Objective
Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
+25% +30%
+50%
Projection
Cost Δ% to original baseline Baseline
PAUC
Critical Technologies
Technology A
Current Assessment
TRL #
Est @ Next
Milestone
TRL #
Technology B
TRL #
TRL #
Technology C
TRL #
TRL #
Technology D
TRL #
TRL #
Technology E
TRL #
TRL #
Technology F
TRL #
TRL #
See Notes Page
R
Cost Δ% to current baseline APUC
Schedule
- IOC or FOC
- (Next Major Evt)
Baseline
G
+10% +15%
PAUC
APUC
+25%
Y
G
Baseline
G
Baseline
MS B Date: M/Yr
MS C Date: M/Yr
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Y
+6 mos
Program X Example:
Cost vs. Msn Capability Tradespace
Emerging Threat Scenarios
Integrity - Service - Excellence
12
Program X Example:
Path to Affordable Requirements
Integrity - Service - Excellence
13
Program X Example:
Anticipated FY13 Cuts
BLUF: Anticipated FY13 cuts are manageable with mod-low impact

Pending $13M FY13 SAC-D mark

Sequestration cut = 9% of $101.4M FY13 - $450K FY12 undistrib.
3DELRR Ledger
$M
FY13 Approved
114.4
FY13 Mark
(13.0)
Demo C
PDRs
Contractor
Costs ($M)
Prior
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Nov
Total
FY13 Sequester
(8.7)
KTR #1
29.4
1.7
1.2
1.2
0.8
1.7
36.0
FY13 Adj BA
92.7
KTR #2
24.7
2.8
2.0
1.9
1.3
2.0
34.7
(101.0)
KTR #3
26.8
3.3
1.4
1.3
0.9
1.5
35.2
Total
80.9
7.8
4.6
4.4
3.0
5.2
105.9
FY13 Rqd (EAC)
FY13 Delta
(8.3)
Demo C work ≤ $19.8M

Descope Cap Demo C ~42% to manage sequestration FY13 cut
Integrity - Service - Excellence
14