1
UGA’S STRATEGIC PLANNING
DASHBOARD
Allan Aycock
Director for Assessment and Accreditation
Shweta Doshi
Business Intelligence Application Analyst
2
Overview
• Background—UGA’s strategic planning process
• About the Dashboard
• Dashboards—help us!
3
UGA Strategic Planning
• Provost initiated process in 2009
• 30 member committee of faculty, staff, students, admins
• Process included
• review of progress on goals of 2000-2010 plan
• campus-wide input via surveys, forums
• review of peer plans
• review of other institutional data
Result . . .
4
Building on Excellence
University of Georgia 2020 Strategic Plan
Approved by faculty University Council in March 2010
Seven Strategic Directions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Building on Excellence in Undergraduate Education
Enhancing Graduate and Professional Programs
Investing in Proven and Emerging Areas of Research Excellence
Serving the Citizens of the State of Georgia and Beyond
Improving Faculty Recognition, Retention, and Development
Improving and Maintaining Facilities and Infrastructure
Improving Stewardship of Natural Resources and Advancing Campus
Sustainability
For each: Strategic Priorities and “Illustrative” benchmarks
5
Some issues noted
• Little alignment between priorities and illustrative
benchmarks
• No consideration of whether data for benchmarks was
available
• Little ownership by senior administrators with responsibility
• No alignment with capital campaign needs
Result . . .
6
New provost, new committee, updated plan
Process included:
• Decision to retain the original Strategic Directions
• Team of “Champions” for each Strategic Direction included VPs
and Deans with responsibilities in areas
• Consideration, revision of Priorities
• Effort to define at least one benchmark from which to measure
each priority
• Consideration of potential for capital fundraising
• Effort to emphasize “hallmarks” (graduate ed, research)
7
Some issues noted . . .
• Too many Priorities (n=72)
• Better buy-in from senior administration, but no explicit
mandate for school/college alignment and data collection
• Already in year three
• Little consideration of whether data for benchmarks
was available
8
Refining the benchmarks
• Meetings with Champions, other offices
• Some setting of priorities for focus
• Challenges of decentralization
• Integration with annual reporting where possible
• Ongoing, iterative process
• In this, perhaps we are a “model”
9
Dashboard Process
• Selecting the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
• Scope
• Strategy
10
About the Dashboard
• SAS Visual Analytics
• Version 6.4M1 Released March 19, 2014
• Data is manually loaded
• Small Number of KPIs
• To keep the project on track and moving
• Data needs to be updated only on an annual basis
• Most available data is coming from sources other than OIR
11
• Speedometer
• Measurable goal
• Increase is better
• Slider
• Measurable goal
• Decrease or Reduction is better
• Line charts
• Goal is a general measure
• Comparators such as peer, aspirational peer data were included
• Bar charts
• Goal is a general measure
• In cases where no comparator data was available
12
About SAS Visual Analytics
• Tool is imperfect and has limitations
• In the Speedometer, we wanted to add the text 2020 Goal next to the number. That feature is not
easily implementable
• The Display of colors in the speedometer will need to be updated annual as currently it is a
constant number and the tool does not support relative numbers
• When you click on the chart, drill down details are not available. We added a list table next to the
line and bar chart to make that data available for users
13
• What does this mean to you?
• UGA is exceeding in Invention Disclosures goal!
• Current Year # is 172
• Current Year target is 157
• Year 2020 Target is 187
14
• What does this mean to you?
• UGA is exceeding in Carbon Emission Reduction Goal!
• Current Year # is 335,913
• Current Year Target is 354,253
• Year 2020 Target is 295,210
15
• What does this mean to you?
• We don’t know how UGA is doing as we don’t have data after the base
year of FY 2011
• Year 2020 Target Rank is 75
16
What does this mean to you?
• UGA’s retention rate is better than UGA’s Peer Institutions
• UGA’s retention rate is very close to UGA’s Aspirational Peer Institutions
17
• What does this mean to you?
• There is an increase in the overall # of non-credit course registrants
• Distance Learning (Online) Registrants have been increasing steadily
• Traditional Instruction Registrants have reduced significantly
18
Thank You!