Chapter Three
Federalism
Chapter Objectives
• Explain the difference between federal and centralized systems of
government, and give examples of each.
• Show how competing political interests at the Constitutional Convention led
to the adoption of a federal system that was not clearly defined.
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF
• State(Uncompressed)
the reasons why federal grants-in-aiddecompressor
to the states have been politically
popular, and cite what have proven to be their pitfalls. Distinguish between
are
needed
togrants.
see thi s pi cture.
categorical
grants and block
• Outline the ways in which national and state powers have been interpreted
by the courts.
• Distinguish between mandates and conditions of aid with respect to federal
grant programs to states and localities. Discuss whether or to what extent
federal grants to the states have created uniform national policies comparable
to those of centralized governments.
• Evaluate the effect of devolution on relationships between the national and
state governments. Assess its implications for citizens as taxpayers and as
clients of government programs.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|2
Governmental Structure
• Federalism: a political system where local
government
unitsi can
make
final
decisions
QuickT
me™
and
a
regarding some governmental activities and
T IFFwhose
(Uncompressed)
decompressor
existence is protected
needed
tolocal
seegovernments
thi s pi cture.
• are
Unitary
System:
are
subservient to the national government
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|3
Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three
Systems of Government
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|4
Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three
Systems of Government
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|5
Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three
Systems of Government
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|6
Positives and Negatives of Federalism
• Negative view: Federalism blocks progress and
protects powerful local interests
• Positive view: Federalism contributes to
governmental strength, political flexibility, and
fosters individual liberty
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
– Federalist #10: small political units allow all
relevant interests to be heard
– Federalism increases political activity
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|7
THEME A: WHO GOVERNS WHAT?
FEDERALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Federalism: A Bold New Plan
• No historical precedent
QuickT i me™
and as
a an
• Tenth Amendment
was added
to clarify thedecompressor
limits of the
T IFFafterthought
(Uncompressed)
national
government’s
power
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
• Elastic language in Article I: Necessary and
Proper Clause expands federal power
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|8
McCulloch v. Maryland
• Could Congress charter a national bank?
Yes, even though this power is not explicitly
in the Constitution
(Necessary
QuickT i me™
and and
a Proper
Clause)
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
• Could states tax the national bank? No,
are
needed
to
see
thi
s
pi
cture.
because “the power to tax is the power to
destroy”
Nullification
•Do States have the right to declare federal laws unconstitutional?
•Settled by the Civil War.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3|9
Federalism Over Time
• Dual federalism: Both national and state
governments are supreme in their own spheres,
which should be kept separate
QuickT i me™ and a
• Hard to make distinctions between state and
T IFF
(Uncompressed)
federal
spheres; distinctionsdecompressor
between them were
blurred
are
needed to see thi s pi cture.
– Particular state issues: law enforcement and education
• But Supreme Court has strengthened states’
rights in several recent cases
– US v Lopez--guns in schools
– US v Morrison--Violence Against Women Act
– Printz v. US--background checks on gun purchasers
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 10
THEME A: DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
• Historically power has flowed to the central
government. What reasons exist for the states to
continue exercising independent power? Given
the Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch, what
prevents the central government from assuming
legal authority over any area of public policy?
• Why doesn’t the federal government always
intervene when states defy its authority?
• Certain areas in Nevada permit prostitution, nine
states have legalized the use of marijuana for
“medical purposes”; Massachusetts has legalized
same-sex marriage. Could the federal
government legally intervene to forbid such
practices in these states? Explain why or why
not?
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 11
THEME B: WHO GOVERNS NOW?
THE CONTEMPORARY POLITICS OF FEDERALISM
Grants in Aid
• Dramatically increased in scope in 20th
century
-grants were a way for federal
government to circumvent strict
constructionist reading of federal power.
• Grants were attractive to state officials for various
reasons
• Required broad congressional coalitions with
wide dispersion of funds, because every state
had incentive to seek grant money
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 12
Categorical Grants v. Revenue Sharing
• Categorical grants for specific purposes defined
by federal law; often require local matching funds
• Block grants (sometimes called special revenue
sharing or broad-based aid) devoted to general
purposes with few restrictions—states preferred
block to categorical grants
• Revenue sharing (sometimes called general
revenue sharing) requires no matching funds and
can be spent on almost any governmental
purpose
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 13
Figure 3.2:
The Changing
Purpose of
Federal
QuickT
i
me™
and
a
Grants to
TState
IFF (Uncompressed)
decompressor
and
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Local
Governments
Why the
change?
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2005, table 12.2.
3 | 14
Figure 3.3: Federal Grants to State and
Local Governments, 1984-2004
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2002, Historical Tables, table 6.1, and Budget of the U.S.
Government, Fiscal Year 2005, table 12.1.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 15
Federal Aid and Federal Control
• Conditions of aid: tell state governments
what they
must do
if they wish
QuickT
i me™
and to
a receive
money
T IFFgrant
(Uncompressed)
decompressor
• are
Mandates:
federal
rules
that
states
or
needed to see thi s pi cture.
localities must obey, generally have little or
nothing to do with federal aid
– Civil rights
– Environmental protection
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 16
Devolution
• Devolution initiatives returned program
management
to the
states,and
withasome
QuickT
i me™
guidelines, but there
is no
T IFFfederal
(Uncompressed)
decompressor
guarantee of federal support
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
• Block grants fund entitlements
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 17
The Devolution Revolution
• Devolution proponents harbor a deep-seated
ideological mistrust of federal government and
believe that state governments are more
responsive to the people
• Deficit politics encouraged devolution
• Devolution is supported by public opinion, but the
strength of that support is uncertain
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
– Case Study: AFDC to TANF (Welfare)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 18
Congress and Federalism
• Members of Congress represent conflicting
constituencies
QuickT i me™ and a
• The
erosion of parties increases
political
T IFF
(Uncompressed)
decompressor
competition
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
• Americans differ in the extent to which we
like federal versus local decisions
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 19
THEME B: DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
• Does the system of grant-in-aid upset the balance of federalism? Do
grant programs enable Congress to dow what it pleases by bribing
states into compliance? Or do these programs merely increase the
likelihood of national policy uniformity? What would be the
consequence if a state refused federal grant money?
• To what extent have interest groups produced grants-in-aid, and to
what extent have grants-in-aid produced interest groups? Who
constitutes a governmental lobby?
• How and why do conservatives and liberals differ over giving aid to
the states without conditions?
• Why can’t federal agencies attack complex problems by producing
and implementing a coherent systematic policy? Why don’t (can’t)
federal bureaucrats issue orders where necessary?
• Does the recent push toward devolution give states too much power?
QuickT i me™ and a
T IFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see thi s pi cture.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 20
Issues connected to federalism
• Gay Marriage
QuickT
i me™ and a
• Medicinal
Marijuana
T IFF
(Uncompressed)
decompressor
• Civil
Rights
needed to see thi s pi cture.
• are
Education
• Bush v. Gore
• Electoral College
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
3 | 21