Sean Duffy (WI-07) Research Book
The following report contains research on Sean Duffy, the Republican incumbent from Wisconsin’s 7th
Congressional District. Research for this research book was conducted by the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee’s Research Department between August 2011 and January 2012.
By accepting this report, you are accepting responsibility for all information and analysis included.
Therefore, it is your responsibility to verify all claims against the original documentation before you make
use of it.
Make sure you understand the facts behind our conclusions before making any specific charges against
anyone.
Table of Contents
Introduction / Executive Summary ............................................................ 4
Biography .................................................................................................. 6
Professional Career .................................................................................. 18
… Life as MTV Personality ..................................................................... 26
… Record as District Attorney................................................................. 30
… Selected Prosecutions as District Attorney ......................................... 38
Personal Finances .................................................................................... 50
… State Disclosures (2001-2009) ............................................................ 60
… Federal Disclosures (2010-Present) .................................................... 65
… Property Ownership ............................................................................ 72
Political Career ........................................................................................ 94
… Out of Touch ..................................................................................... 104
… Ineffective for Wisconsin .................................................................. 113
… Just Another Politician ...................................................................... 117
… Pay-to-Play Issues ............................................................................. 128
Abortion and Family Planning Issues .................................................... 132
Budget Issues ......................................................................................... 134
Campaign Finance and Election Law Issues .......................................... 146
Consumer Issues .................................................................................... 149
Crime and Public Safety Issues.............................................................. 152
Earmark Issues ....................................................................................... 154
Economic Stimulus and Financial Bailout ............................................. 156
Education Issues .................................................................................... 160
Energy Issues ......................................................................................... 161
Environmental Issues ............................................................................. 163
Financial Reform Issues – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ....... 164
Financial Reform Issues – Housing Assistance...................................... 171
Financial Reform Issues – Wall Street Oversight .................................. 181
Foreign Policy Issues ............................................................................. 189
Gay and Lesbian Issues.......................................................................... 190
Gun Issues ............................................................................................. 191
2
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Health Care Issues ................................................................................. 192
Labor and Working Family Issues ......................................................... 200
Legal Reform Issues .............................................................................. 201
Legislative Issues ................................................................................... 203
Local Issues ........................................................................................... 205
Military Personnel Issues ....................................................................... 207
Other Social Issues ................................................................................ 209
Seniors’ Issues – Medicare, Medicaid and Prescription Drugs .............. 210
Seniors’ Issues – Social Security Issues ................................................. 213
Small Business Issues ............................................................................ 220
Tax Issues .............................................................................................. 221
Terrorism and Homeland Security ......................................................... 233
Terrorism and Homeland Security Issues – Civil Liberties.................... 234
Trade Issues ........................................................................................... 235
Transportation Issues ............................................................................. 238
Veterans’ Issues ..................................................................................... 239
Appendix I – Paid Media Summary .................................................... 241
Appendix II – Campaign Finance ........................................................ 250
Appendix III – Outstanding Questions ................................................ 259
3
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Introduction / Executive Summary
Key Video
Duffy Said He Struggled On $174,000 Congressional Paycheck
SEAN DUFFY: “I can guarantee you, or most of you, I guarantee that I have more debt than all of you.
With 6 kids, I still pay off my student loans. I still pay my mortgage. I drive a used minivan. If you think
I’m living high on the hog, I’ve got one paycheck. So I struggle to meet my bills right now. Would it be
easier for me if I get more paychecks? Maybe, but at this point I’m not living high on the hog.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAAtSVQyXZU
Duffy Said “I Can’t Create Jobs”
SEAN DUFFY: “I can’t create jobs”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReVPlmE4Fic&t=13s
Duffy Compares Economy To His Garden
SEAN DUFFY: “I’m not a farmer, I said I was a lumberjack. But I do have a garden! I think the economy
is much like a garden. When you garden, you have to have good seeds, good soil, right? And you have to
have sun and water, and if you put that all together it’s amazing! Your plants will grow! Once in a while
you throw a little Miracle Grow on and they grow a little more. The economy is no different. You can’t
have – you can’t have no sun and bad soil, and just pour miracle grow and expect the plant to grow.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7UNwShImyQ&t=3m8s
Duffy Said He Would Not Vote for Straight Repeal of Healthcare Reform
SEAN DUFFY: “Well I made it clear that if this was just a straight repeal, I’m not gonna vote for it.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTAapplzuCE&t=1m50s
Duffy Hand-Holds Camera, Looks Exhausted
In a 2010 visit to the Price County Fair’s 4H auction, Duffy is filming himself by holding the camera,
swaying around and looking tired.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-z4kogCF7k
Duffy Stripped and Danced In Window
4
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
On a post-Real World special, Duffy stripped down to his underwear and pretended to put on a strip
show. He then took off his underwear and held a pillow over his front, before stepping in front of a
window to moon people watching outside. He finished by asking a cast member if she masturbated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvE0S4fg0RQ
Duffy’s Wife Talks About Their Christmas Sushi Party
RACHEL CAMPOS-DUFFY: “Every year my family throws a sushi party at Christmas. I know that
sounds kind of non-traditional, but you’d be surprised at how much people enjoy the party. I fly the sushi
from somewhere else. I live in Wisconsin, so I can’t get it any other way. But it’s really easy, I get on the
internet, I order it—flies in the next day. I cook up a pot of me so smooth, I steam some edamame and I
make some white rice. Everybody comes over and they love to get involved in making the sushi. And
probably the best thing about it is that every body is so tired of stuffing and cheesy hors d’oeuvres and
everything that is so fattening that they are always complementing me and telling me it’s the healthiest
meal they’ve had in weeks. So you know, the best way to survive the holidays is to not strive for
perfection. Go ahead throw the party and invite everyone over, but find clever ways to distribute the
work.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNRjo5VtOXk
5
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Biography
This section provides background information on Sean Duffy’s personal life,
including education, personal finances, property holdings, and other areas. Searches
were conducted at various local in Ashland County, media outlets including the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Sawyer County Record, and the Wausau Daily
Herald, as well as a number of other online resources, including Lexis-Nexis.
Birth
Sean Patrick Duffy was born on October 3, 1971 in Hayward, Wisconsin. [Various]
Residence
In 2011, Duffy moved his family to Weston, Wisconsin. [Green Bay Press Gazette, 10/13/11]
NOTE: At the time of this research report, no further information regarding this property was found. For
further information regarding Duffy’s home in Weston, consult the Outstanding Questions appendix.
Education
The following outlines Duffy’s education:
1997-1999: Attended William Mitchell College of Law
Between 1997 and 1999, Duffy attended William Mitchell College of Law, where he eventually
graduated with a JD. [Various]
1990-1994: Attended St. Mary’s College
Between 1990 and 1994, Duffy attended St. Mary’s College, where he eventually graduated with a
BA in marketing. [Various]
1990: Graduated from Hayward High School
In 1990, Duffy graduated from Hayward High School. [Sawyer County Record, 11/10/10]
Played Hockey for Hayward Hurricanes
As a child in Hayward, Duffy played hockey for the Hayward Hurricanes. [Sawyer County
Record, 11/10/10]
Traveled with Scheer’s Luberjack Shows
6
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
As a college and law school student, Duffy traveled the country with Scheer’s Lumberjack
Shows. [Sawyer County Record, 11/10/10]
Family
Duffy is married to Rachel Campos-Duffy, with whom he has six children. [Various]
Duffy Was One of 11 Children
Duffy was one of 11 children of Hayward, Wisconsin’s Tom and Carol Duffy. [Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel, 6/17/97]
Brother Was Elected Mayor of Hayward
Between 1995 and 2009, Duffy’s brother Thomas J. Duffy served as mayor of the City of
Hayward. [Thomas J. Duffy LinkedIn profile, accessed 10/26/11]
Father Was “Big Fan” of President Obama
In 2011, Duffy said that his father was a “big fan” of President Obama. [Leader-Telegram, 1/16/11]
Family Active in Sawyer County Legal Community
Duffy’s father and one of his brothers ran law firms in Hayward, Wisconsin.
Duffy’s grandfather was a judge from 1938 to 1960 in Sawyer County. [Wausau Daily Herald, 6/14/03]
Brother Served as Sawyer County Corporation Counsel
Since 1992, Thomas J. Duffy served as Sawyer County Corporation counsel. [Thomas J.
Duffy LinkedIn profile, accessed 10/26/11]
Brother Ran Unsuccessfully for Sawyer County Judge
In 2009, Thomas J. Duffy ran for Sawyer County Circuit Court Judge, however he lost to
Jerry Wright. [Election Results, April 2009]
Father Served as Sawyer County Court Commissioner
As of 2011, Duffy’s father Thomas W. Duffy served as Sawyer County Court
Commissioner. [sawyercountygov.org, accessed 10/26/11]
Grandfather Served as Sawyer County Judge
As of 2011, Duffy’s grandfather Walter Duffy served as a Sawyer County judge and
Register of Deeds. [Duffy for Judge Facebook Page, accessed 10/26/11]
7
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Religion
Duffy is Catholic. [Various]
Said His Faith Had “A Role In Every Aspect of Who I Am”
In a 2010, Duffy said that his faith had “a role in every aspect of who I am.” [The Catholic Times,
10/21/10]
Career
The following outlines Duffy’s professional career:
2002-2010: Served as District Attorney for Ashland County
Between June 2002 and June 2010, Duffy served as District Attorney for Ashland County. [Duffy
Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003; Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Duffy was appointed in 2002 by Governor Scott McCallum, and was re-elected without opposition
until his resignation in 2010. [Associated Press, 6/03/02; Duffy letter to Governor Doyle, 6/04/10; LeaderTelegram, 9/11/10]
NOTE: For further information regarding Duffy’s time as District Attorney, consult the
Professional Career section.
Temporarily Served as Bayfield County District Attorney
In 2006, Duffy was temporarily appointed Bayfield County District Attorney while that
county’s district attorney Craig Haukaas was under investigation. [Doyle Letter to Duffy,
11/30/06]
2003-2009: Served on Governor Jim Doyle’s Pardon Advisory Board
Between April 2003 and September 2009, Duffy served on Governor Jim Doyle’s Pardon
Advisory Board. [Doyle letter to Duffy, 4/07/03; Duffy letter to Doyle, 9/30/09]
2005: Applied to Become US Attorney
In 2005, Duffy applied to become a US Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin. [Capital
Times, 5/26/05]
NOTE: Duffy was not selected as US Attorney.
2000-2003: Served as Special Prosecutor for Ashland County
Between 2000 and 2003, Duffy served as special prosecutor for Ashland County. [Duffy Resume
from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
8
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: For further information regarding Duffy’s time as District Attorney, consult the
Professional Career section.
Temporarily Worked for Bayfield County
In 2002, Duffy worked as Special Prosecutor for Bayfield County. [Wisconsin Department of
Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
2002: Ran His Own Law Firm
In 2002, Duffy ran his own law firm, Duffy Law Practices. [Associated Press, 6/03/02]
1999-2000: Practiced Law with His Father
Between August 1999 and October 2000, Duffy practiced law at his father’s law firm, Thomas
Duffy Law Offices. He stated that he was involved in general law practice, specifically advising
family, criminal, and real estate matters. [Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003;
Central Wisconsin Sunday, 11/07/10]
1997-2003: Public Speaker for World Wide Talent Agency
Between 1997 and 2003, Duffy worked as a public speaker for the World Wide Talent Agency.
[Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
1997: Part of MTV’s “Real World” TV Show
In 1997, Duffy was part of MTV’s “Real World” television show filmed in Boston,
Massachusetts. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/17/97]
1987-1999: Lumberjack Sport Competitor
Between 1987 and 1999, Duffy competed as a lumberjack sport competitor. [Duffy Resume from
Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
Voting Registration
As of 2011, Duffy was registered to vote at 2906 City Heights Road in Ashland, WI. His voting status
was active. [Wisconsin Voter Public Access, accessed 8/16/11]
Voting History
The following outlines Duffy’s voting history:
Date
Name
4/05/11 2011 SPRING ELECTION
11/02/10 2010 GENERAL ELECTION
9
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Method
Absentee
At Polls
9/14/10
4/06/10
2/16/10
4/07/09
2/17/09
11/04/08
4/01/08
4/03/07
11/07/06
4/04/06
2010 PARTISAN PRIMARY
2010 SPRING ELECTION
2010 SPRING PRIMARY
2009 SPRING ELECTION
2009 SPRING PRIMARY
2008 PRESIDENTIAL AND GENERAL ELECTION
2008 SPRING ELECTION
2007 SPRING ELECTION
2006 GENERAL ELECTION
2006 SPRING ELECTION
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
At Polls
[Wisconsin Voter Public Access, accessed 8/16/11]
NOTE: Data prior to 2006 was not available.
Criminal Record
The following outlines Duffy’s criminal record:
Date
12/29/10
Agency
Ashland Police Department
Incident
Traffic Stop
9/08/10
Wisconsin State Patrol
Speeding
6/22/10
Ashland Police Department
9/22/09
Washburn County Sheriff’s
Department
1/31/09
5/23/07
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Traffic Stop
Exceeding Speed
Zones (110MPH)
Traffic Stop
Traffic Stop
7/23/06
Ashland Police Department
Parking Violation
6/03/06
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Speeding
12/02/05
10/28/05
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Traffic Stop
Traffic Stop
6/03/05
Ashland County Sheriff’s Department
Traffic Stop
3/31/05
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Theft
6/10/04
Minnesota State Patrol
Speeding
12/07/03
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Traffic Citation
10
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Notes
Pled to amended
speeding charge,
charged $175.30
fine and 3 points
No contest plea,
$175.30 fine
Parked at boat
launch without
sticker, issued ticket
No contest plea,
$160.80 fine
Verbal warning for
speeding 72 in 55
MPH zone
Duffy was only
listed as “involved”,
not as a suspect*
Pled guilty, $130.00
fine
5/31/03
(Occurred in Chisago County, MN)
Speeding
2/07/03
Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department
Traffic Citation
12/16/01
Hayward Police Department
Speeding
Pled guilty, $40
fine, $40 surcharge
Pled no contest,
charged $126.20
fine
[Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department; Ashland County Sheriff’s Department; Ashland Police Department;
Minnesota State Patrol; Chippewa County Case # 2010TR006645; Chisago County Case #13-T2-03-002842]
*NOTE: It appears that Duffy was unwittingly sold a pair of stolen speakers for his car, and cooperated
fully with the police throughout the investigation. There is also no evidence that Duffy was charged with
anything. However, for reasons unknown, the police identified Duffy as living in Washburn.
License Briefly Suspended in 1995
In 1995, Duffy’s driver’s license was suspended for approximately three months for “lack of
points due to traffic citations.” [Questionnaire, Duffy Application to State Pardon Advisory Board, 4/07/03]
Potentially Appeared In Court Three Times for Speeding
As of 2011, Duffy has potentially appeared in court three times for speeding:
Violation
Date
Court Date
Agency
Incident
9/22/09
11/02/09 at
8:45am
Washburn County
Sheriff’s Department
6/02/06
7/10/06 at
1:30pm
Wisconsin State Patrol
6/10/04
-
(Tried in Carlton County,
Minnesota)
Exceeding Speed
Zones (110MPH)
Speeding in 55
MPH Zone (1115 MPH)
Speeding
Notes
No contest plea,
$175.30 fine
No contest plea,
$160.80 fine
Pled guilty,
$130.00 fine
[Washburn County Case #2009TR001929;
Bayfield County Case # 2006TR001542;
Carlton County Case #09-T3-04-002556]
NOTE: It is unlikely that Duffy appeared in court for any of these court cases. Records for the
2009 case do not indicate that a hearing occurred. Records for the 2006 case indicate that a
hearing occurred; however they state that Duffy’s appearance was via “letter”, suggesting he
wrote to the court and did not personally appear. Records for the 2004 case indicated that Duffy
was able to pay his fine without appearance, suggesting he did not personally appear for the case.
Licenses
The following outlines Duffy’s licenses:
Year
License
11
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2011
2011
2009
2009
2008
2007
2007
2006
2005
2005
2004
2004
Husband/Wife Fishing – Primary
Husband/Wife Fishing – Spouse
Husband/Wife Fishing – Primary
Husband/Wife Fishing – Spouse
Resident Annual Fishing
Res Husband/Wife Fishing – Primary
Res Husband/Wife Fishing – Spouse
Res Husband/Wife Fishing – Primary
Res Husband/Wife Fishing – Spouse
Res Husband/Wife Fishing – Primary
Resident Annual Fishing
Duplicate Annual Fishing
[Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
Personal Donations
The following outlines Duffy’s personal donations to candidates and committees other than himself:
Donated Nearly $2,500 to Federal Candidates and Committees
As of 2011, Duffy has donated $2,450 to federal candidates and committees:
Date
6/17/08
8/05/04
7/26/04
6/30/04
2/16/04
12/18/03
Name
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Russ Darrow for Senate Inc.
Russ Darrow for Senate Inc.
Mark Green for Congress
TOTAL
Amount
$600.00
$550.00
$550.00
$350.00
$200.00
$200.00
$2,450.00
[fec.gov, accessed 10/12/11]
Donated Nearly $6,500 to State and Local Candidates and Committees
As of 2011, Duffy has donated $6,479 to state and local candidates and committees:
Date
5/24/11
5/24/11
5/16/11
5/16/11
5/15/11
2/07/11
8/30/10
4/17/10
2/08/10
Name
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Republican Party of Lincoln Co.
Price Co. Republican Party
Severson for Assembly
Langlade County Republican Party
Barron County Republican Party
Amount
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$20.00
$60.00
$50.00
$20.00
$70.00
12
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2/07/10
2/01/10
1/29/10
10/24/09
9/10/09
6/16/09
5/05/09
4/06/09
3/27/09
2/21/09
1/28/09
10/20/08
10/15/08
9/23/08
9/22/08
4/25/08
2/20/08
10/23/07
9/24/07
5/14/07
4/16/07
2/21/07
12/06/06
11/20/06
4/10/06
2/21/06
6/13/05
6/13/05
12/06/05
12/01/05
12/06/04
10/20/04
7/04/04
5/14/04
5/04/04
8/11/03
4/28/03
4/08/03
7/26/02
6/18/02
5/31/02
12/13/01
Price Co. Republican Party
Chippewa County Republican Party
Sawyer County Republican Party
Douglas Co. Republican Party
Friends of Dave Ross
Douglas Co. Republican Party
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Thomas J. Duffy Election Committee
Koschnick for Judge
Douglas Co. Republican Party
Citizens for Wolf for Judge
Mary Williams for 87th District Assembly
Mary Williams for 87th District Assembly
Citizens for Tiffany
Republican Party of Wisconsin
Friends of Kent Muschinske
Gableman for Supreme Court
Mary Williams for 87th District Assembly
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Friends of Dave Zien
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Green for Wisconsin
Green for Wisconsin
Van Hollen for Attorney General
Van Hollen for Attorney General
Wisconsin Republican Party
Mary Williams for 87th District Assembly
Mary Williams for 87th District Assembly
Linton for the North
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Wisconsin Republican Party
Friends of Farrow
Scott McCallum for Governor 2002
Brunner for Justice
Scott McCallum for Governor 2002
TOTAL
$20.00
$32.00
$50.00
$27.00
$50.00
$10.00
$45.00
$250.00
$50.00
$25.00
$50.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$20.00
$50.00
$100.00
$25.00
$20.00
$50.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$100.00
$20.00
$40.00
$500.00
$1,000.00
$120.00
$80.00
$20.00
$100.00
$50.00
$500.00
$20.00
$130.00
$150.00
$20.00
$100.00
$500.00
$100.00
$1,500.00
$6,479.00
[cfis.wi.gov, accessed 10/13/11; followthemoney.org, accessed 10/13/11]
13
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Duffy: “You Don’t Get More Wisconsin Than Me”
In 2010, Duffy said, “You don’t get more Wisconsin than me.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 5/08/10]
… And Said He Was “A Beneficiary of the Great American Dream”
In 2010, Duffy said he was “a beneficiary of the great American dream.”
“I’ve worked hard in my life,” he said. “I haven’t had a lot of things given to me. But I have heart
and I’ve been a beneficiary of the great American dream. If you work hard and you use whatever
God-given talents you have, you can do a lot of things.” [Daily Press, 10/24/10]
Said U.S. Constitution Guaranteed Right to “Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness”
In 2011, responding to a question whether health care was a right, Duffy responded by saying that the
Constitution guaranteed “the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”:
DUFFY: I believe that we have in our Constitution the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness. That’s what I think our rights are. I want to work to make sure that we have
health care that’s affordable — that people can actually access. And that’s what I’m
working for right now. [MediaMattersAction on youtube.com, uploaded 6/10/11]
… Though Those Rights Came From The Declaration of Independence
The phrase, “right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” came from the Declaration of
Independence. [ushistory.org]
Wore Wristband of Local Soldier Who Died in Iraq
During his 2010 campaign, Duffy worse a gray wristband with the name of Staff Sergeant Jeremy Dale
Vrooman, who died in Iraq in 2008.
“His courage, the sacrifice he made, how he saved the lives of so many other men in the military who
were with him,” Duffy said.
Duffy later put a picture of the soldier in his Congressional office. [Superior Telegram, 4/15/11]
Slept on Air Mattress in Office
In 2011, Duffy slept on an air mattress in his congressional office. [Green Bay Press Gazette, 12/25/11]
Rolled Logs Competitively
As a child, Duffy rolled logs.
14
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“In most towns, kids take swimming lessons in the summer,” he explained. “In Hayward, kids take log
rolling lessons.” [Wisconsin State Journal, 6/30/02]
Three-Time World Champion Lumberjack
As of 2010, Duffy was a three-time world champion lumberjack in the 60-foot speed climb.
[Washingtonian, August 2010]
Competed on ESPN’s “Great Outdoor Games”
In 2003, Duffy took part in the lumberjack competition during ESPN’s “Great Outdoor Games.”
He did so again in 2004. [Wausau Daily Herald, 6/14/03, 6/27/04]
Was Honorary Athlete for Badger State Winter Games
In 2004, Duffy was an honorary athlete for the Badger State Winter Games.
As part of his responsibilities, Duffy would recite the oath of athletes, carry the torch and light the
caldron during the opening ceremony in Marathon Park. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/15/04]
Brother Was World-Champion Log Roller
As of 2002, Duffy’s brother Brian was a five-time world champion log roller. [Wisconsin State
Journal, 6/30/02]
Listed Address in Spooner on 2010 Donation
In February 2010, Duffy donated $70 to the Barron County Republican Party, listing his address as
“Spooner, WI 54801.” [Barron County Republican Party Campaign Finance Report, July Continuing 2010]
NOTE: No further information explaining why Duffy listed Spooner as his address was found.
Disagreed with Rachel Duffy When In Their Relationship She Got Pregnant
In 2000, Duffy disagreed with his wife when their relationship began. While Duffy claimed it took them a
month before “this whole thing started to take place” – referring to his daughter – his wife Rachel claimed
it was a year. [YouTube.com]
Took Duffy and His Wife Three Months to Name Child
According to an interview with People Magazine, Duffy’s wife Rachel said it took them three months
after their child John-Paul was born to name him. [people.com, 4/01/08]
Met His Wife on MTV’s “Road Rules” Show
Duffy met his wife Rachel Campos through the MTV “Road Rules” show. [Associated Press, 8/31/04]
15
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Married to Rachel Campos-Duffy
The following outlines information about Duffy’s wife Rachel Campos-Duffy
According to the American Forces Press Service, Campos-Duffy’s mother was a native of Spain, and her
father served in the Air Force. [defense.gov, 9/16/04]
Professional Career
The following outlines Campos-Duffy’s professional career:
Was on Real World San Francisco
Before meeting Duffy, Rachel Campos Duffy was on MTV’s show Real World San
Francisco. [Wausau Daily Herald, 6/13/03]
2003: Nearly Joined “The View”
In 2003, Rachel Campos-Duffy was one of the final contestants to become a co-host of
ABC’s “The View.” [Associated Press, 11/06/03]
Appeared in Several Episodes Since 2000
Since 2000, Rachel Campos-Duffy had appeared in several episodes of The View.
[Daily Press, 1/17/03]
2004: Part-Time Hosted Lifetime Show “Speaking of Women’s Health”
In 2004, Rachel Campos-Duffy worked part-time as host of the Lifetime show “Speaking
of Women’s Health.” [Associated Press, 8/31/04]
2008: Worked for AOL
In 2008, Rachel Campos-Duffy worked as a host for the AOL Living Site and had a
weekly column on AOL’s parenting site, ParentDish, called “Views from the Home
Front.” [people.com, 4/01/08]
AOL Sent Crews to Film at Duffy’s House
In a 2008 interview, Rachel Compos-Duffy said that AOL sent crews to their home
to film for her AOL Living page.
“AOL sends a crew to my house and we shoot for a five-to-eight-day period a few
times a year. I feel so blessed because a mom couldn’t have it any better than that.
They are a great company to work with,” she said. [people.com, 4/01/08]
16
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Worked as Travel Consultant for Local Waterpark
As of 2003, Rachel Campos-Duffy had worked as a travel consultant for the Kalahari
Waterpark Resort in the Wisconsin Dells. [Wausau Daily Herald, 6/13/03]
Active in Politics
The following outlines Campos-Duffy’s involvement in politics:
Said Conservative, Tea Party Women Would Be Instrumental in GOP Victories
In 2010, Duffy’s wife Rachel Campos-Duffy said that conservative, Tea Party women
would be instrumental in GOP victories.
“Our mommas and grand mommas are not happy,” Campos-Duffy said. [Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel, 5/22/10]
Went to Bush White House for National Hispanic Heritage Month Celebration
In 2004, Campos-Duffy attended a Bush White House event celebrating National Hispanic
Heritage Month. [defense.gov, 9/16/04]
Claimed Obama’s Pro-Choice Position Should Disqualify Him from Nobel Prize
While on the View, Rachel Duffy said that Obama’s stance on abortion should have
disqualified him for the Nobel Peace Prize. [YouTube.com]
Wrote Op-Ed Criticizing Casey Anthony’s Parents for Neglecting Their Grandchild
In 2011, Rachel Campos-Duffy wrote an op-ed for the National Review criticizing Casey
Anthony’s parents for neglecting their grandchild.
“The difference between my parents and the Anthonys is that I can guarantee that if I had
anything to do with the disappearance of one of my kids, or if I was lying or withholding
information about my child’s whereabouts to the cops, as Casey clearly did and was found
guilty of today, my parents would not be trying to help me get away with it,” she stated.
[National Review, 7/05/11]
Supported Missing Children Bill
In 2011, Duffy urged Congress to pass a bill that would make it a felony for parents to fail
to report missing children. [Wausau Daily Herald, 7/15/11]
17
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Professional Career
Significant Findings
 Applied to become US Attorney
 Resigned from Pardon Advisory Board in 2009, citing pressures of campaign…
then resigned as County DA nearly a year later, citing pressures of campaign
 Appointed Ashland County District Attorney after donating $2,000 to Governor
McCallum’s campaign
 Avoided investigating previous Ashland County DA who allegedly made
fundraising phone calls to help Governor McCallum
Duffy is a career litigator, beginning at his father’s law firm before serving as a
Special Prosecutor and an acting Assistant District Attorney, and later as a
District Attorney. While serving as a District Attorney, Duffy unsuccessfully
applied to become US Attorney, and served on the state Pardon Advisory Board.
There are several issues surrounding Duffy’s appointment as Ashland County DA.
He was appointed after donating $2,000 to Governor Scott McCallum’s campaign,
which included Duffy’s first (and largest yet) reported donation of $1,500. Duffy
later declined to investigate the previous Ashland County DA, who allegedly made
fundraising phone calls to help McCallum from the DA’s office.
Though Duffy cited the pressures of his congressional campaign when he resigned
in 2009 from Doyle’s Pardon Advisory Board, it took Duffy nearly a full year after
to resign as DA, where he again cited the pressures of his campaign.
Professional Career
The following outlines Duffy’s professional career:
NOTE: Though the Sawyer County Record reported that Sean Duffy served on the Hayward Board of
Appeals, the Hayward City Clerk stated the newspaper was in error.
2010: Returned to His Family’s Law Practice
In 2010, after resigning as District Attorney for Ashland County, Duffy returned to his family’s
law practice. [Associated Press, 6/04/10]
18
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2002-2010: Served as District Attorney for Ashland County
Between June 2002 and June 2010, Duffy served as District Attorney for Ashland County. [Duffy
Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003; Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Duffy was appointed in 2002 by Governor Scott McCallum, and was re-elected without opposition
until his resignation in 2010. [Associated Press, 6/03/02; Duffy letter to Governor Doyle, 6/04/10; LeaderTelegram, 9/11/10]
Temporarily Served as Bayfield County District Attorney
In 2006, Duffy was temporarily appointed Bayfield County District Attorney while that
county’s district attorney Craig Haukaas was under investigation. [Doyle Letter to Duffy,
11/30/06]
The investigation involved an alleged deal between Haukaas and a defendant, where the
defendant was told to flee the state even those he was due in court.
The defendant was later arrested, and told the public defender of the alleged deal.
Haukaas was suspended from his job because of the revelation, though he was eventually
acquitted and reinstated in 2007. [Associated Press, 4/14/07]
NOTE: It appears that Duffy served as Bayfield County DA from November 2006 through
April 2007.
2003-2009: Served on Governor Jim Doyle’s Pardon Advisory Board
Between April 2003 and September 2009, Duffy served on Governor Jim Doyle’s Pardon
Advisory Board. [Doyle letter to Duffy, 4/07/03; Duffy letter to Doyle, 9/30/09]
2005: Applied to Become US Attorney
In 2005, Duffy applied to become a US Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin. [Capital
Times, 5/26/05]
NOTE: Duffy was not selected as US Attorney.
2000-2003: Served as Special Prosecutor for Ashland County
Between 2000 and 2003, Duffy served as special prosecutor for Ashland County. [Duffy Resume
from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
NOTE: While Duffy indicated on a 2003 resume that he was working as special prosecutor for
Ashland County, at the same time he was also working as DA for Ashland County. No further
evidence explaining the discrepancy was found.
19
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Hired When Ashland’s Assistant DA Went on Maternity Leave
When Duffy was appointed in November 2000, he was tasked with continuing the work
left by Ashland County’s Assistant DA, who left on maternity leave. [Wisconsin Department of
Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
… And Claimed He Became “Acting Assistant DA”
According to his 2010 campaign website, shortly after becoming special prosecutor for
Ashland County, Duffy became “the acting assistant D.A, and later the District Attorney of
Ashland County.” [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 10/25/11]
Temporarily Worked for Bayfield County
In 2002, Duffy worked as Special Prosecutor for Bayfield County. [Wisconsin Department of
Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
NOTE: It appears that Duffy was working for Ashland and Bayfield Counties at the same
time.
2002: Ran His Own Law Firm
In 2002, Duffy ran his own law firm, Duffy Law Practices. [Associated Press, 6/03/02]
NOTE: No further information regarding Duffy’s private practice was found.
1999-2000: Practiced Law with His Father
Between August 1999 and October 2000, Duffy practiced law at his father’s law firm, Thomas
Duffy Law Offices. He stated that he was involved in general law practice, specifically advising
family, criminal, and real estate matters:
[Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003;
Central Wisconsin Sunday, 11/07/10]
1997-2003: Public Speaker for World Wide Talent Agency
Between 1997 and 2003, Duffy worked as a public speaker for the World Wide Talent Agency.
[Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
20
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: While Duffy indicated on a 2003 resume that he worked for this company, there is no
evidence to determine if he continued to work after 2003.
1997: Part of MTV’s “Real World” TV Show
In 1997, Duffy was part of MTV’s “Real World” television show filmed in Boston,
Massachusetts. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/17/97]
… And Met His Wife Rachel Campos on MTV’s “Road Rules” Show
Duffy met his wife Rachel Campos through the MTV “Road Rules” show. [Associated Press,
8/31/04]
Rachel Campos Was on Real World San Francisco
Duffy’s wife Rachel Campos was on Real World San Francisco. [Wausau Daily Herald,
6/13/03]
1987-1999: Lumberjack Sport Competitor
Between 1987 and 1999, Duffy competed as a lumberjack sport competitor. [Duffy Resume from
Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
Licenses
The following outlines Duffy’s professional licenses:
Name
Wisconsin State Bar Association
Minnesota State Bar Association
Entity
July 1999
October 2001
[Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
Was In Good Standing
As of 2011, Duffy had an active status and was in good standing. [Wisconsin Office of Lawyer
Regulation, 8/24/11]
No Record of Public Discipline
As of 2011, as a lawyer, Duffy has no record of public discipline. [Wisconsin Office of Lawyer
Regulation, 8/24/11]
Resigned from Pardon Advisory Board in 2009, Blaming Pressures of Congressional Campaign
In September 2009, Duffy resigned from the Pardon Advisory Board, citing the difficulties of serving on
the board and campaigning simultaneously:
21
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[Duffy letter to Doyle, 9/30/09]
… Then Resigned as County DA Nearly A Year Later, Again Blaming Congressional Campaign
On June 5th 2010, Duffy announced that he would quit his job as Ashland’s District Attorney. He
explained he would remain on the job for three weeks while Governor Jim Doyle worked on finding a
replacement.
“I know that as Election Day draws nearer, my schedule will become more strained and the people of
Ashland will be better served by a district attorney who will not be distracted by a congressional
campaign,” Duffy said. [Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Said It Was Matter of Ethics for Him to Resign Office While Campaigning
In 2010, Duffy said it was a matter of ethics for him to resign office while campaigning.
“I don’t think you can rightfully campaign and ask the taxpayers to pay you while you are
engaging in this endeavor,” he said. [Daily Press, 10/24/10]
Accused of Neglecting Job While Campaigning for Office
In 2010, Duffy’s former part-time assistant district attorney Dan Goglin accused Duffy for
neglecting his job while campaigning for office.
“We did not see him often,” Goglin said in a television ad on behalf of the Lassa campaign. “His
campaign was taking him away from the job. All the time, witnesses (and) victims would have to
wait in the hallway for him to come to work. The quality of services that were provided to the
citizens of this county suffered.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 10/13/10]
… But Local News and Officials Disagreed
Several others said that they did not observe any problems with Duffy’s handling of his district
attorney’s duties, including The Daily Press editor Claire Duquette, district court administrator
Scott Johnson, Ashland County Clerk of Courts Katie Colgrove. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 10/13/10]
22
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… And Fact Checking Group Rated Criticism “Barely True”
In 2010, fact checking group PolitiFact Wisconsin rated “barely true” the claim that Duffy was an
absent Ashland County DA:
In making her charge, Julie Lassa cites some nights out of town and days out of the
office, but by themselves they are not evidence that Sean Duffy’s campaign
schedule had a negative impact on his work schedule. Thus, her claim largely
centers on the testimony of assistant district attorney Dan Goglin, who cites several
general examples of delays. But others at the Ashland County courthouse paint a
different story and largely do not back up his claims. Nevertheless, by Duffy’s own
admission, in his final months on the job it was a difficult balance. That is why, he
said, he resigned -- something Lassa and other higher-office seekers have not
done… We rate Lassa’s claim Barely True. [politifact.com, 9/21/10]
Appointed County District Attorney After $2,000 in Donations to Governor McCallum
The following outlines Duffy’s donations leading up to his appointment as Ashland County District
Attorney:
FIRST: Duffy Donated $2,000 to Governor McCallum by June 2002
Between 2001 and June 2002, Duffy donated $2,000 to Governor Scott McCallum’s gubernatorial
campaign:
 $1,500 on December 13, 2001
 $500 on June 18, 2002
[followthemoney.org, accessed 10/13/11]
… Which Included Duffy’s First and Largest Reported Donation
As of 2011, Duffy’s first and, to date, his largest reported donation to a state or federal
candidate was $1,500 to Governor Scott McCallum’s gubernatorial campaign on
December 13, 2001. [followthemoney.org, accessed 10/13/11]
NOTE: Duffy later donated $1,500 between two separate contributions to Mark Green’s
gubernatorial campaign in 2005.
SECOND: McCallum Appointed Duffy as District Attorney in June 2002
In June 2002, Governor Scott McCallum appointed Duffy as Ashland County District Attorney.
[Associated Press, 6/03/02]
Potentially Let Previous County DA Off Hook for Making Fundraising Phone Calls for Governor
McCallum
23
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines potential ethics issues surrounding former Ashland County DA Michael
Gableman:
FIRST: Gableman Allegedly Made Fundraising Phone Calls Supporting McCallum From
Public Office
In 2002, while at his DA’s office, Gableman allegedly made phone calls to support Governor Scott
McCallum. [John Smart Opinion, Daily Press, 7/23/09]
Gableman Called Duffy’s Brother During This Time
While making phone calls to help McCallum, Gableman allegedly called Duffy’s brother
Thomas Duffy Jr. [John Smart Opinion, Daily Press, 7/23/09]
Both Gableman and the Duffy Brothers Donated on Same Day
Gableman, Thomas and Sean Duffy allegedly all donated to McCallum’s campaign on the
same day. [John Smart Opinion, Daily Press, 7/23/09]
THEN: State Commission Decided Not to Press Charges
A state commission reviewing the Gableman allegations refused to press charges.
“[The] set of provable facts, while suggesting that Gableman may have been imprudent or may
have used poor judgment in not maintaining a more absolute wall of separation between his
political life and his professional responsibilities as Ashland County district attorney, does not
constitute criminal conduct, or conduct which involves dishonesty, fraud, deceit and
misrepresentation,” it explained. [John Smart Opinion, Daily Press, 7/23/09]
AND: Duffy Refused to Investigate Gableman
In 2008, watchdog group One Wisconsin Now asked Duffy to investigate Gableman, but Duffy
refused. [John Smart Opinion, Daily Press, 7/23/09]
Wrote Opinion Piece In His Defense
Responding to Smart’s opinion piece criticizing his role in the Gableman controversy,
Duffy wrote his own opinion defending himself.
In it, Duffy denied dragging his feet responding to One Wisconsin Now records requests,
and that he had no jurisdiction to investigate Gableman’s phone calls because Gableman
no longer lived in Ashland County.
“I have and continue to execute my duties as Ashland County district attorney with honor
and integrity. I am proud to be a district attorney who doesn’t play partisan politics and
who is committed to following the rule of law,” Duffy stated. [Duffy opinion, Daily Press,
7/29/09]
24
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Possibly Started Business with Brother
In 2003, Duffy and his brother Patrick secured financing from the Chippewa Valley Bank,
using a 1999 Skyline B202CT as collateral. [UCC Financing Statement, File No. 030014532924, 9/03/03]
The financing was terminated less than a year later. [UCC Financing Statement Amendment, File No.
040003532417, 3/03/04]
NOTE: No further records indicate how much financing was secured, or what it was for.
25
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Life as MTV Personality
Significant Findings
 Said he ended his involvement with MTV’s Real World in the 90s… but was
involved with the show twice in the 2000s
 Nearly fired from job on MTV show for drinking alcohol in front of children
 Stripped and danced in window and on pool table
 Appeared on gay marriage mockumentary
As a personality on MTV’s reality television show “The Real World,” Duffy was
nearly fired from his job for drinking alcohol in front of children. He stripped and
danced in a window and on a pool table, and later appeared in a gay marriage
mockumentary. Duffy claims he ended his involvement with The Real World in the
1990s, however he was involved with the show twice in the 2000s.
Starred on MTV’s “Real World” Boston TV Show
In 1997, Duffy was part of MTV’s “Real World” television show filmed in Boston, Massachusetts.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/17/97]
Said He Ended His Involvement In MTV’s Real World in Mid 90s
In a 2010 interview with Politico, Duffy said he had ended his involvement with MTV’s Real World
series in the mid 1990s.
“It is so not a part of my life. Six months, 15 years ago; it’s a lifetime ago for me,” he said. [politico.com,
10/20/10]
2001: Left Job as Special Prosecutor to Attend “Real World” Spinoff
In 2001, while he was serving as special prosecutor for Ashland County, Duffy took time off to
attend a “Real World” spinoff in Cabo San Lucas.
“He had the blessing of the district attorney there because he was just the hourly salary guy. It was
the equivalent of vacation,” his spokesman explained. [politico.com, 10/20/10]
Duffy Got Saturn Car for Winning Competition
26
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
As part of his winning a Real World competition at Cabo, Duffy and his partner Elka
Walker together won a Saturn car. [politico.com, 10/20/10]
2003: Said He Had Moved Past His Real World Days
In 2003, Duffy said his time on Real World was part of his past.
“I highly doubt that a guy from reality TV who has no substance would stand a chance against
anybody like Dave Obey. ... It is part of my past. I have moved beyond that,” he said. [Capital Times,
6/23/03]
2008: Took Part in MTV Taping for Real World Reunion
According to an interview with Duffy’s wife Rachel, MTV sent a camera crew to the Duffy’s
home to film a segment with them and their children for the Real World reunion show. [people.com,
4/01/08]
NOTE: It is unclear exactly when the MTV crew came to Duffy’s home, however the interview
where Rachel Duffy related the events occurred in 2008.
Nearly Fired from Job After Drinking Alcohol in Front of Children He Was Supposed to Care For
During the taping of Real World Boston, Duffy was nearly fired from his job supervising an after-school
program after he and other cast members drank alcohol in front of the children. [Associated Press, 5/06/10]
Defended Time on Real World
As of 2010, the Duffys have defended their time on MTV’s Real World television show:
Duffy Said He Was Young
In 2010, Duffy defended his time on the Real World, saying he was young.
“I was young,” he said. “They edit in things. I didn’t have any kids yet. If you want to know my
character, look at the kids I’ve raised. All I can do is tell you this is what I’ve done. This is where
I’ve been. This is where I stand.” [Huffington Post, 6/29/10]
Duffy Said He Had No Regrets
Duffy said, “I was out dancing on pool tables in my underwear and I didn’t have a significant
other and I was looking at younger women at the time… and you know what some of those things
will come out. You know that stuff is behind me, but I’m sure that it will come out, and I really
have no regrets about it.” [Dan Mielke for Congress YouTube Channel, Minute 7:18, 6/15/10]
NOTE: The date of Duffy’s quote is not indicated on the video.
Rachel Duffy Said She and Her Husband Had No Regrets
27
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Rachel Duffy said, “Sean and I were single, having fun, on a reality show that was, we were pretty
sure that was going to improve out dating life afterwards. It is what it is and I have no regrets
about it and Sean has no regrets about it. Because frankly, we were who we were at that time.”
[Dan Mielke for Congress YouTube Channel, Minute 7:02, 6/15/10]
NOTE: The date of Rachel Duffy’s quote is not indicated on the video.
Duffy’s Real World Clips
The following outlines various significant clips from Duffy’s time on MTV’s Real World television
show:
Summary
Description
On a post-Real World special, Duffy stripped
down to his underwear and pretended to put
Stripped and Danced
on a strip show. He then took off his
in Window, Then
underwear and held a pillow over his front,
Asked Woman if
before stepping in front of a window to moon
She Masturbated
people watching outside. He finished by
asking a cast member if she masturbated.
Coming home drunk after being at the bars,
Stripped and Danced
Duffy took off his pants and danced on a pool
on Pool Table
table with a pool stick.
Going to a club in Puerto Rico, Duffy yelled
Yelled He Wanted
to Montana on the beach, “I want to go get
to Get Naked
naked with you!”
Talked About
On a clip from “The Real World You Never
Sleeping with
Saw,” Duffy talked about sleeping with his
Girlfriend on Pool
girlfriend Becky on the pool table and trying
Table
to avoid the cameras.
Duffy talked about his time in Philadelphia,
Talked About Being and how he had met a girl in the “freshman
“Loaded” in
dorms” when he was “kind of loaded.” He
Freshman Dorms
said he was trying to ditch camera men to be
alone with her.
Cast Member Said
Cast member Montana said that Duffy wanted
Duffy Was Looking to hook up with one of the “Road Rules” girls.
to Hook Up
Duffy called cast member Kameelah a bitch.
Called Cast Member
a Bitch
Went to Gay Bar
Smoked
Duffy went to a gay bar with cast members
Genesis and Kameelah
Duffy smoked a cigarette outside a fire house.
Link
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=uvE0S4fg0R
Q
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=QPk_f3inz6M
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=cjEJSwpy4P4
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=va_x3oknczg
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=ZsuPQW6MF
vk
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=pAfhR_rYl9Q
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=b6CBWJ7rED
w
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=4iAiTjp2ylc
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=zB236CcpgQ
28
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Fell Asleep During
Clinton Speech
Said There Were No
Black People in
Wisconsin
Said He Would Go
to Church Next
Week
Said Words
“Cooter” and
“Boobies”
Duffy talked about how he did not know any
black people and that there were no black
people in Wisconsin.
When asked if he would attend church with
another cast member, Duffy said “next week.”
o
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=1OMyx5gSN
Rs
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=4DbJ6b_mgn
Y
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=o8iYqrtr8vg
Talking to another cast member, Duffy said
the words “cooter” and “boobies”
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=D4XiIrG_jf0
Duffy fell asleep during a Bill Clinton speech.
[Various Real World episodes]
Duffy’s Wedding Video Clips
The following outlines various significant clips from Duffy’s time on MTV’s mockumentary “The
Wedding Video” about a gay couple getting married:
Summary
Said He Did Not
Know If People
Were Born Gay, but
that Gay People in
LA Corrupted
Toasted Gay Couple
Called Gay Man’s
Friends “Bitches”
Said He Wished
Gay Man Luck
Rachel Duffy Said
She Had Great
“Gaydar”
Rachel Duffy Tried
to Set Gay Man Up
with Another Man
Description
Duffy said, “I don’t know what it is about gay
people... I don’t know if they’re born gay or
they go out to LA or Sa Francisco and catch a
disease and become gay, I’m not sure but...
They have so many free thoughts out there in
LA that you can be whatever you want to be
and actually in today’s society I think that gay
people encourage gayness and they actually
corrupted him there in LA.”
Duffy gave a toast to the gay couple getting
married.
Duffy called a gay man’s friends “bitches”.
Duffy wished gay man luck in his marriage.
Rachel Duffy said she had great “gaydar”, and
that she knew a gay man was gay before he
did.
At a gay man’s “Bridal Luncheon,” Rachel
Duffy tried to set him up with another man.
Link
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=1NtqqMC7W
2I
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=gdwIM0l-PYk
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=dHR6Jz8olng
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=q8ms64WlHtc
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=XHVwslNPW
ig
http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=eiTSofBlULA
[The Wedding Video]
29
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Record as District Attorney
Significant Findings
 Violent crime nearly quadrupled under Duffy
 Aggravated assaults increased over 140 percent
 Had highest rate of sexual assaults in Wisconsin in 2009
 Ranked one of the worst counties in state for fatal drunk driving
 … While only 17 percent of prosecutions involved felonies
Duffy actively prosecuted cases for Ashland County between 2000 and 2010, but
his record as County District Attorney is controversial. In 2009, the year Duffy
announced his run for Congress, violent crime in Ashland County had nearly
quadrupled since Duffy became DA, and the county had the highest rate of sexual
assaults in the state. By the time Duffy left office in 2010, aggravated assaults
increased over 140 percent. Ashland County was also ranked one of the worst
counties in the state for fatal drunk driving. Yet only 17 percent of Duffy’s
prosecutions involved felonies.
Prosecuted Cases for Ashland County Since 2000
Between 2000 and 2010, Duffy prosecuted cases for Ashland County, first as a Special Prosecutor and
later as the county’s District Attorney:
2002-2010: Served as District Attorney for Ashland County
Between June 2002 and June 2010, Duffy served as District Attorney for Ashland County. [Duffy
Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003; Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Duffy was appointed in 2002 by Governor Scott McCallum, and was re-elected without opposition
until his resignation in 2010. [Associated Press, 6/03/02; Duffy letter to Governor Doyle, 6/04/10; LeaderTelegram, 9/11/10]
Temporarily Served as Bayfield County District Attorney
In 2006, Duffy was temporarily appointed Bayfield County District Attorney while that
county’s district attorney Craig Haukaas was under investigation. [Doyle Letter to Duffy,
11/30/06]
30
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The investigation involved an alleged deal between Haukaas and a defendant, where the
defendant was told to flee the state even those he was due in court.
The defendant was later arrested, and told the public defender of the alleged deal.
Haukaas was suspended from his job because of the revelation, though he was eventually
acquitted and reinstated in 2007. [Associated Press, 4/14/07]
NOTE: It appears that Duffy served as Bayfield County DA from November 2006 through
April 2007.
2000-2003: Served as Special Prosecutor for Ashland County
Between 2000 and 2003, Duffy served as special prosecutor for Ashland County. [Duffy Resume
from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003]
NOTE: While Duffy indicated on a 2003 resume that he was working as special prosecutor for
Ashland County, at the same time he was also working as DA for Ashland County. No further
evidence explaining the discrepancy was found.
Hired When Ashland’s Assistant DA Went on Maternity Leave
When Duffy was appointed in November 2000, he was tasked with continuing the work
left by Ashland County’s Assistant DA, who left on maternity leave. [Wisconsin Department of
Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
… And Claimed He Became “Acting Assistant DA”
According to his 2010 campaign website, shortly after becoming special prosecutor for
Ashland County, Duffy became “the acting assistant D.A, and later the District Attorney of
Ashland County.” [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 10/25/11]
Temporarily Worked for Bayfield County
In 2002, Duffy worked as Special Prosecutor for Bayfield County. [Wisconsin Department of
Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
NOTE: It appears that Duffy was working for Ashland and Bayfield Counties at the same
time.
Only 17 Percent of Duffy’s Prosecutions Involved Felonies
Between 2000 and 2010, Duffy prosecuted 5,398 different cases, only 17 percent of which involved
felonies:
Type
Amount
Percentage
31
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Felony
Misdemeanor
Criminal Traffic
Traffic Forfeiture
Non-Traffic Ordinance Violation
TOTAL
893
2,529
776
523
677
5,398
17%
47%
14%
10%
12%
[Wisconsin Circuit Court Access, accessed 10/20/11]
NOTE: Duffy was listed as the prosecuting attorney in these cases, however it is possible that other
lawyers could have been involved in the prosecutions.
Violent Crime Rate Nearly Quadrupled Under Duffy
While Duffy served as Ashland County DA, the violent crime rate per 100,000 Wisconsin residents in
Ashland County nearly quadrupled:
YEAR
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
VIOLENT CRIME RATE
Ashland
WI
88
223
136
217
218
211
331
244
379
289
213
288
203
276
344
259
197
250
[Wisconsin Office of Justice Statistics, accessed 10/27/11]
NOTE: The crime rate dropped in 2010 to just over double its rate in 2002.
Aggravated Assaults Increased Over 140 Percent Under Duffy
The following table outlines the changes in crime rates per 100,000 residents in Ashland County while
Duffy served as its district attorney:
Offense
Murder
Forcible Rape
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Theft
Motor Vehicle Theft
Arson
2002 Rate
0
11.8
0
76.6
524.2
2,249.8
159.0
11.8
2010 Rate
0
12.3
0
185.0
413.0
2,177.0
80.0
6.0
% Change
0
4.2
0
141.5
-21.2
-3.2
-49.7
-49.2
[Wisconsin Crime in 2002 and 2010]
32
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: This table should be used with caution. Data from one month in 2002 with Ashland County Sheriff
was unavailable. As the Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance noted, “offense rates based on less than 12
months of data would be misleading.”
… And Once Had Third-Highest Rate of Aggravated Assault in Wisconsin
In 2009, Ashland County had the third-highest rate of aggravated assault in Wisconsin, after
Menominee and Milwaukee Counties. [Wisconsin Crime in 2009]
Ashland County Had Higher-Than-Average Rates of Aggravated Assault When Duffy Left
Office
The following table compares the crime rates per 100,000 residents in Ashland County, in Duffy’s
final year as its district attorney, to those rates for the state as a whole:
Offense
Murder
Forcible Rape
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Theft
Motor Vehicle Theft
Arson
Ashland Rate
0
12.3
0
185.0
413.0
2,177.0
80.0
6.0
State Rate
2.8
21.0
80.0
146.0
475.0
1,892.0
143.0
12.0
Difference
-2.8
-8.7
-80
39
-62
285
-63
-6
[Wisconsin Crime in 2010]
Had Highest Rate of Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin in 2009
In 2009, Ashland County had the highest rate of sexual assaults per 100,000 residents of any county in
Wisconsin:
Rank
1
2
3
4
4
County
Ashland
Vilas
Lincoln
Kewaunee
Fond du Lac
Rate
167
163
146
143
143
[Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin, 2009]
… More Than Twice Statewide Rate
In 2009, Wisconsin’s rate of sexual assaults was 82 per 100,000 residents, while Ashland
County’s was 167 per 100,000 residents – more than twice as much. [Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin,
2009]
33
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Had Third Highest Rate in 2008… and Nearly Twice State Rate
In 2008, Ashland County had the third highest rate of sexual assaults per 100,000 residents in
Wisconsin.
Though Wisconsin had a rate of 83 sexual assaults per 100,000 residents, Ashland County had 160
sexual assaults per 100,000 – nearly twice the state’s rate. [Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin, 2008]
Drunken Driving Issues in Ashland County
The following outlines drunken driving issues in Ashland County:
Wisconsin Ranked Number One for Driving Under The Influence
As of 2008, Wisconsin was ranked first in the nation for driving under the influence. [Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel, 10/19/08]
Ashland County Ranked 15th in Fatal Drunk Driving
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Ashland County had eight fatal drunken driving
crashes between 2003 and 2007, which ranked the county 8th among the state’s 72 counties for
such accidents:
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wasted in Wisconsin]
Northern Wisconsin Offered “Disproportionate Venues for Drinking Outside The Home”
In 2008, the Wisconsin State Journal reported that northern Wisconsin offered “disproportionate
venues for drinking outside the home.”
“Just southwest of Ashland in Sawyer County, there are a mere 80 residents for every liquor
license; to the east in Iron County, there are only 69,” the newspaper stated. [Wisconsin State Journal,
2/03/08]
45 Percent of Fatal Crashes in Wisconsin in 2009 Were Alcohol-Related
In 2009, 49 percent of all fatal traffic crashes in Wisconsin were alcohol-related. [dot.wisconsin.gov,
modified 5/26/11]
34
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Won 63 of 68 Trials
While serving as Ashland County District Attorney, Duffy won a guilty verdict on 63 of 68 trials. The
remaining five trials received a not-guilty verdict. [Ashland County District Attorney’s trial records, accessed
11/28/11]
Touted Over 90 Percent Conviction Rate
During his 2010 campaign for Congress, Duffy boasted of having an over 90 percent conviction
rate.
“I’m proud of my record as a prosecutor,” Duffy said when launching his campaign last year. “I’m
proud of my jury-trial success rate, which stands at over 90 percent.” [The Hill, 6/08/10]
Possibly Violated Ethics if Duffy Used His Office to Compile Statistic
According to Democrats, had Duffy used his office to compile his conviction rate statistics, he
could have violated ethics rules.
“Reports that Sean Duffy was using the district attorney’s office for personal political purposes
and his abrupt resignation when asked about it [raise] serious doubts about [his] credibility,”
DCCC spokesperson Gabby Adler said.
However, Duffy’s campaign called the accusation “ridiculous”.
“We did everything by the book here,” Duffy’s spokesperson Matt Seaholm said. [The Hill, 6/08/10]
NOTE: It is unlikely that Duffy needed his office to compile the statistic, given that it provided a
list of Duffy’s trial cases and their verdicts as a public record.
Rarely Absent from Office
The following outlines instances where Duffy was recorded as away from his office:
NOTE: Some calendar entries note Duffy’s absence with a question mark. The tables below reflect that
distinction.
Dates – 2010
January 1
February 2
Dates – 2009
May 1
July 24
September 3
35
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
September 7-8
Dates – 2008
April 16-17
May 19-30
June 6
June 27
July 15-18
August 21-September 4
Dates – 2007
March 12-16
April 9-13 (?)
July 6
July 13-20
August 23-31
October 25-November 2
Dates – 2006
April 20-21
May 19
June 12-16
July 7
July 27-28
August 24-September 1
September 7-15
October 12-16
October 27-November 3
Dates – 2005
January 4-7
May 18-20 (?)
July 1-12
July 13-14 (?)
September 6-9
December 16
Dates – 2004
February 10-11
March 5
March 26
July 6-16
July 23
36
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
July 30
August 30-September 3
September 20
October 8
Dates – 2003
January 9-10
January 29-31
July 2-3
July 9-11
July 14-18
July 25
August 22
October 22-24
December 18
Dates – 2002
February 8
April 3-13
April 30
July 8 (@ 2 PM)
July 11-12
July 18-19
September 11-23
[Ashland County District Attorney Calendars]
37
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Selected Prosecutions as District Attorney
Items of Interest
 Several perpetrators of child sexual assault let off with lenient sentences
 Several drunk drivers, some of whom were driving with children, were let
off with lenient sentences
 Man charged with physical abuse of child only found guilty of disorderly
conduct
 Man charged with killing someone in hit and run found not guilty by jury
 Man charged with first degree sexual assault of a child found not guilty by
jury
Though Duffy bragged about his record as County DA, emphasizing his record on
child sex crimes, he prosecuted several cases where the predator was let off with
light punishment. A father who sexually assaulted his 8-year-old daughter was
sentenced to just one year in jail, while another father who sexually assaulted his
daughter was let off with misdemeanor charges instead of felonies. A grandfather
who molested his grandchildren got three months in jail. And an elderly man who
gave drugs to and had sex with a teenager got four years probation.
Duffy prosecuted several drunk driving cases where the perpetrator was let off with
a light sentence. A ten time OWI offender was stripped of his driving privileges for
six months while another repeat OWI offender with a 6-month-old in the back seat
got less than a year in jail. Another man with his fifth OWI, with a 7-year-old in the
vehicle, was sentenced to one year in jail.
Duffy may have also prosecuted cases where the defendant was found not guilty of
the charges. A man charged with killing someone in a hit and run was found not
guilty by jury. Another who was charged with first degree sexual assault of a child
was found not guilty by jury. And a man charged with first degree sexual assault
was found not guilty by jury.
NOTE: There are outstanding requests for filings in cases where the defendant was found not guilty. This
section will be updated as those requests are answered.
38
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Father Who Sexually Assaulted 8-Year-Old Daughter Sentenced to One Year in Jail
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man who sexually assaulted his 8-year-daughter up to
ten times was sentenced to only one year in jail, after nine of the ten charges were dismissed.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:









On March 25, 2002, City of Ashland Police Department made contact with E.M., who was 8 years
old and the victim of sexual assault.
E.M. stated that Timmy Michel, her father, touches her “pee pee” with his hand and “wiener.”
“E.M. further stated that ‘gray yucky stuff came out of her dad’s wiener’ and that same was on her
belly but that her dad cleaned the gray stuff off of her when he was done.”
“E.M. further stated that the defendant put his ‘wiener’ inside her ‘pee-pee’ and on the outside of
her ‘pee-pee.’ E.M. stated that ‘it felt yucky and it hurt.’”
E.M. stated that this type of contact occurred approximately 10 times.
There are further graphic descriptions of oral sex and other types of sexual contact.
Michel claimed he was “teaching his daughter the difference between a man and a woman,” and
he said he knew it was wrong.
Michel pled guilty to one count of first degree sexual assault of a child. Nine other counts of first
degree sexual assault of a child were read into the record and dismissed.
The maximum sentence Michel could have received for pleading guilty to first degree sexual
assault of a child was 60 years in prison. But Michel was sentenced to one year in Ashland County
jail and 15 years probation.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Timmy Fredrick Michel, Case No. 2002CF000043, Filed 3/27/02]
NOTE: Duffy became District Attorney after this case’s filing, but before the defendant’s guilty plea.
Father Who Sexually Assaulted His Daughter Let Off with Misdemeanor Instead of Felony
In 2001, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a stepfather who groped his daughter was let off with a
fourth degree sexual assault, a misdemeanor, instead of a second degree sexual assault with a child, a
felony.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:





On August 1, 2001, Ashland County Sheriff’s Department made contact with 18-year-old Holly
Deerman, the victim of Timothy Kusick, her stepfather.
Deerman said that on July 23, 2001, Kusick picked her up by her rear, and later pushed her onto
the sofa. Kusick then got on top of her.
At the time, Kusick was 41 years old.
“Holly states that nearly every day, the defendant would place his hands down her panties and
shirt.”
Deerman said on March 10, 1998, when she was 14, Kusick put his hands up the back of her shirt
and to the sides of her breast.
39
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012


Deerman said around March and April 1997, when she was 13, Kusick would grope her breasts.
“Holly states that from that point forward, she remembers the defendant groping her almost every
day.”
Despite being charged with two counts of second degree sexual assault of a child, punishable of up
to 30 years in jail each, Kusick plead guilty to two counts of fourth degree sexual assault. He was
sentenced to four years probation with a 90 day jail sentence and 100 hours of community service.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Timothy P. Kusick, Case No. 2001CF000091, filed 8/17/01]
NOTE: While Duffy was not the DA at the time, he served as the prosecuting attorney.
Grandfather Who Molested His Grandchildren Got Three Months in Jail
In 2007, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a grandfather who repeatedly molested his grandchildren
received three months in jail.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:






On December 18, 2007, the Ashland Police Department made contact with KMPG, the 15-yearold granddaughter of Albert Piff.
KMPG described how Piff “accidentally” grabbed her breasts and touched and offered to kiss
them in a subsequent event.
The Ashland Police Department then made contact with CM, the 14-year-old granddaughter of
Piff.
CM described how Piff repeatedly touched her breasts and “digitally penetrated her vagina or
attempted to do the same.”
Though initially charged with three counts of incest with child and three counts of second degree
sexual assault of child, Piff only pled guilty to two counts of second degree assault. The third
count of assault, as well as the three counts of incest, was dismissed.
The maximum sentence for any of the counts was 40 years in jail. However Piff was sentenced to
four years probation with 90 days in jail and 180 days of electronic monitoring.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Albert Leo Piff, Case No. 2007CF000153, filed 12/27/07]
Old Man Who Gave Drugs To and Had Sex with Child Let Off with Four Years Probation
In 2001, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, an old man who gave drugs to and had sex with a young
girl was sentenced to four years probation.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:



On April 7, 2001, the City of Mellen Police Department made contact with 16-year-old Heather
Sacia, the victim of James Henri.
Sacia said at 12:30 am she “received a phone call from James Henri, the defendant herein, who
asked her to come over to his house at 719 Monroe St. in the City of Mellen, County of Ashland,
to drink some beer, smoke some marijuana and make a little love.”
At the time, Henri was 50 years old.
40
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012






“Heather stated that while at James Henri’s house, she consumed 30 cans of beer, and smoked 15
bowls of marijuana over a 19 hour period of time.”
Sacia began to cry when asked by the police why Henri would ask her to come over and “make a
little love”, saying “he would hurt me if I told anybody.”
Sacia said she passed out and woke up with Henri lying next to her naked. He then forcibly had
sexual intercourse with Sacia.
Of the nine charges, six were dropped including exposing child to harmful material and 3rd degree
sexual assault. The maximum penalty for both of those charges was five and ten years,
respectively.
Henri pled no contest to possessing THC with intent to distribute/deliver, having sexual contact or
intercourse with a child, and possessing with intent to manufacture or deliver a prescription drug.
Henri was sentenced to four years probation and one year suspension of license.
[State of Wisconsin vs. James R. Henri, Case No. 2001CF000051, filed 5/01/01]
NOTE: While Duffy was not the DA at the time, he served as the prosecuting attorney.
Man Who Sexually Assaulted Woman Behind Carnival Trailer Let Off with Probation
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man who sexually assaulted a woman behind a carnival
trailer to be guilty of fourth degree sexual assault, a misdemeanor, instead of second degree sexual
assault, a felony.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:








On July 27, 2002, Ashland County Sheriff’s Department was conducting a security check at the
Butternut Park in the Village of Butternut at which time three individuals approached him. One
was Kristi Shilts, the victim.
Shilts said she was talking to her ex-husband when she became upset and left the area by talking
away fast.
At that point, Tyrone Irons took her by the hand and led her behind some carnival trailers.
Irons said, “I want you, I want you real bad” and began to kiss her and pull up her skirt, at which
time Shilts said that was not right.
Irons then threw Shilts to the ground and causing Kristi to cry very hard.
Irons then sexually assaulted Shilts with his hands, then let her up and said “nothing happened.”
Though Irons was initially charged with second degree sexual assault, he pled guilty to fourth
degree sexual assault, along with resisting an officer and disorderly conduct.
Irons was sentenced to three years probation and 90 days in the Ashland County jail.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Tyrone Leigh Irons, Case No. 2002CF000109, filed 8/19/02]
Man Who Sexually Assaulted Woman Given Sixty Days in Jail
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man who sexually assaulted a woman was given sixty
days in jail.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:
41
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012




On November 1, 2002, the Bad River Police Department responded to a call that Kelly Bowman
had been touched inappropriately.
Bowman said that while she was sleeping in the downstairs portion of the home with her
boyfriend Josh Wolfe, “she woke up to find Paul Deloney, the defendant herein, with his hand
down her pants touching her vagina.” Bowman did not consent.
Deloney was charged with second degree sexual assault, but plead guilty to fourth degree sexual
assault.
Deloney was sentenced to 60 days in the local county jail.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Paul Ochabewis Deloney, Case No. 2002CF000186, filed 12/13/02]
Woman Who Sexually Assaulted 13-Year-Old Let Off Without Jail Time
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a woman who pled guilty to 4th degree sexual assault of a
14-year-old was sentenced to two years probation and 30 days electric home monitoring, with no jail time.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:





The Ashland County Sheriff’s Department received information from LaTricia Dugger, an
investigator and child protection worker for the Ashland County DHS, regarding N.L., a 13 year
old who was assaulted in Tina Lueloff’s home on November 12, 2002.
N.L stated that she was laying on the sofa in Lueloff’s home when Lueloff attempted to “make
out” with N.L.
“N.L. states that Lueloff, the defendant herein, then began kissing N.L. and began moving
Lueloff’s hand up and down on N.L.’s breasts.”
“N.L. states that Lueloff then unzipped her pants and did touch N.L. inside of her pants with the
defendant’s hand.”
Lueloff pled guilty to 4th degree sexual assault and was sentenced to two years probation and 30
days electric home monitoring.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Tina Marie Lueloff, Case No. 2003CF000003, 1/17/03]
Man Charged with Physical Abuse of Child Was Only Found Guilty of Disorderly Conduct
In 2003, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man charged with physical abuse of a child was only
found guilty of disorderly conduct and bail jumping.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:
 On July 21, 2003, the Ashland County Police Department made contact with a minor A.R.T.
 A.R.T. stated that earlier that morning an individual Bryan Markeson drove up behind him and his
friends, got out of his car and then punched A.R.T. twice in the face, then punched one of A.R.T.’s
friends once in the face, then punched A.R.T. twice against in the face.
 Markeson was charged with physical abuse of child as a repeater, misdemeanor battery as a
repeater, disorderly conduct as a repeater, and misdemeanor bail jumping as a repeater.
 The charge of physical abuse of a child carried a jail sentence of up to fifteen years.
 Markeson was eventually found guilty on two counts, disorderly conduct as a repeater and bail
jumping as a repeater, for each of which he was sentenced to a year in jail running concurrently.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Bryan J. Markeson, Case No. 2003CF000075, 7/29/03]
42
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Only Revoked Ten Time OWI Offender’s Operating Privileges for Six Months
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a ten time OWI offender had his license revoked for only
6 months.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:







On May 29, 2002, the Ashland County Sheriff’s Department pulled over Theodore Polkoski.
Polkoski refused a breathalyzer, began to wrestle, and refused to comply with officers’ demands to
draw blood.
After blood was drawn, tests showed a .196 BAC.
This was Polkoski’s 10th OWI offense.
Polkoski was charged with several counts of criminal behavior. Four of the five counts were
dismissed, including a count for jumping bail on felony charges. Had the count of jumping bail
remained, the maximum sentence for Polkoski could have included 10 years in prison.
Polkoski pled “no contest” and received a prison sentence of one year with extended supervision
of 1.5 years.
In addition, Polkoski’s operating privileges were revoked six months.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Theodore Peter Polkoski, Case No. 2002CF000078, filed 6/19/02]
NOTE: Polkoski was sentenced for two other OWIs the same day as this case, for which his operating
privileges were revoked, in each case, for six months. A request has been made to clarify this information.
Let Drunk Driver With 6-Month-Old in Back Seat to Spend Less than Year in Jail
In 2001, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man with his 4th OWI was sentenced to less than a year
in jail, despite having a 6-month-old infant in the car during the 4th the time.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:







On November 8, 2001, the Bad River Police Department pulled over Dalton Whitebird Jr.
The officer noticed an infant child in the back seat who was approximately 6 months old.
Whitebird failed several sobriety tests and was tested with a .11 BAC.
This was Whitebird’s 4th OWI.
Whitebird was charged with three counts of criminal behavior. The maximum penalty for the first
two counts was four years in prison. The maximum penalty for the third count was three years in
prison.
Whitebird pled no contest to one count and was sentenced to 330 days in local jail and fined
$2,407.
Whitebird’s license was revoked for 33 months and his vehicle was equipped with an ignition
interlock for 33 months.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Dalton C. Whitebird, Case No. 2001CF000134, filed 11/16/01]
NOTE: While Duffy was not the DA at the time, he served as the prosecuting attorney.
43
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Man with Fifth OWI Received Eight Months in Jail
In 2004, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man with his fifth OWI received eight months in jail.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:







On the evening of July 2, 2004, the Ashland County Sheriff’s Department pulled over Todd Burd
for not turning on his headlights.
Burd appeared intoxicated, did not have a license and failed sobriety tests.
Burd did not have a license because it had previously been revoked.
Within three hours, Burd blew a .09 BAC.
This was Burd’s fifth OWI.
Burd was charged on three counts of criminal behavior. The maximum penalty for a fifth OWI
offense is six years in prison, and the maximum penalty for driving without a license was one year
in jail.
Burd plead “no contest” to one count of OWI, and the driving without a license charge was
dropped. He was sentenced to eight months in jail, four years probation and loss of license for 24
months and a $734 fine.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Todd K. Burd, Case No. 2004CF000054, filed 7/14/04]
Man Involved in High Speed Chase Allowed to Leave Jail to Visit Mom
In 2002, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man involved in a high speed chase with Ashland
police was able to take one day each month during his jail sentence to visit his mother.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:







On May 23, 2001, the City of Ashland Police was involved in a high speed chase with Robert Lee
Otto.
After his vehicle lost control, Otto jumped out of the vehicle and then ran away from the police.
He eventually fell to the ground, attempted to get back up, and was captured by the police.
After failing several sobriety tests, a blood sample showed Otto had a BAC of .206.
This was Otto’s 4th DUI offense.
Otto was charged with four counts of criminal behavior, two of which were dismissed by the
prosecutor while Otto pled “no contest” to the remaining two.
Otto was sentenced to 350 days in jail, with credit for time served and being allowed to be
released one day per month to stay at his mother’s home.
Otto was also fined $5,993 and lost his license for 36 months.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Robert Lee Otto, Case No. 2001CF000061, filed 6/15/01]
NOTE: While Duffy was not the DA at the time, he served as the prosecuting attorney.
Charged Man with First Degree Sexual Assault of Child… But Jury Found Him Not Guilty
In 2001, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man charged with first degree sexual assault of a child
was found not guilty by a jury.
44
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:
 On February 2, 2001, the Ashland Police Department made contact with C.M., a six year old
daughter of William Motel.
 C.M. stated that Motel touched her “butt”, but “pointed to the vagina on a female drawing.”
 “C.M. stated that the defendant moved his fingers when he touched her ‘butt’ area.”
 The Ashland Police Department officer who made the contact stated that the defendant was six
years old at the time of the incident.
 Separately, Cheryle Motel stated that C.M. told her she had a rash in her vagina, saying, “Daddy
dit it.”
 Cheryle Motel noted that C.M. said “Daddy told me to spread my legs and it hurt me” but that
C.M. later said “Daddy didn’t do this to me, I think it was the cat.”
 Motel was charged with first degree sexual assault of a child and incest with a child.
 However, a jury found him not guilty on both counts.
[State of Wisconsin vs. William Motel, Case No. 2001CF000040, 4/02/01]
NOTE: While Duffy was not the DA at the time, he served as a prosecuting attorney.
Charged Man with First Degree Sexual Assault… But Jury Found Him Not Guilty
In 2003, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man Daniel Houle charged with first degree sexual
assault was found not guilty by a jury.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:
 On April 11, 2003, the Bad River Police Department made contact with Danielle Topping
 Topping stated that she went to a house in Sanborn on the Bad River Reservation, where she was
tired and fell asleep on the couch
 Topping stated that five to ten minutes later she woke up “with her pants off and Daniel Houle on
top of her having sexual intercourse with her.”
 “Topping states that Nelis and Powless were holding her arms while Houle was having intercourse
with her.”
 “Topping states that she began fighting and yelling for the three of them to knock it off.”
 “Topping states that when Houle was completed, he got of her and held her with Nelis while
Powless got on top of Topping and began having sexual intercourse with her.”
 Topping stated that she was eventually able to break free and leave, at which time she called law
enforcement.
 Houle was charged with first degree sexual assault as a repeater.
 However, Houle was found not guilty at a jury trial.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Daniel J. Houle, Case No. 2003CF000038, 5/04/03]
NOTE: A request for further information regarding this case and the cases against Powless and Nelis has
been made.
Charged Man with Killing Someone in Hit and Run… But Jury Found Him Not Guilty
45
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2003, with Duffy overseeing the prosecuting attorney, a man charged a hit and run resulting in death
was found not guilty by a jury.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:
 On January 3, 2003, the Ashland County Sheriff’s department made contact with an employee of
Bell Street Tavern who worked as a bartender along with John C. Nelson through New Years Eve.
 As of 4 and 5 a.m. January 1st, Nelson had been working at Bell Street Tavern nearly 24 hours. At
the time, his coworker told him to go upstairs and rest.
 Approximately a half hour after the coworker had given him that advice, she received a
“somewhat frantic” call from Nelson, who had driven to his parents home, and asked to speak to
the chief of police for the LaPointe Police Department Michael Anderson.
 Nelson explained to Anderson that he noticed some “dark material” in the road and wanted the
police to check it out.
 The LaPointe Police then investigated the road, finding a man Joseph Cunningham lying dead in
the road.
 Nelson later told police that he was driving down the road and his windshield was fogged up, but
that he saw something “that did not appear right to him.”
 Nelson further stated that he had driven over the object but that he did not feel a bump.
 Nelson was charged with hit and run resulting in death.
 However, a jury found him not guilty.
[State of Wisconsin vs. John C. Nelson, Case No. 2003CF000033, 4/21/03]
NOTE: A request for further information regarding this case has been made.
ALSO NOTE: This case was prosecuted by Daniel Goglin, formerly a strong supporter of Duffy’s 2010
Democratic opponent Julie Lassa.
Let Man Arrested for 3rd OWI While Driving 7-Year-Old Daughter Sentenced Only To A Year in
Jail
In 2003, with Duffy as the prosecuting attorney, a man caught with his third OWI – with his 7-year-old
daughter in the car – was sentenced to only one year in jail.
The relevant facts of the case are as follows:






On October 28, 2003, the City of Ashland Police Department pulled over Thomas Salmon.
Salmon smelled of alcohol and failed several field sobriety tests. He was tested with a .23 BAC.
Salmon was also driving with his 7-year-old daughter also in the vehicle.
This was Salmon’s third OWI.
Salmon was charged with three counts of criminal behavior. The maximum penalty for each of the
first two counts was two years in prison, double the original maximum of one year because a
minor child was in the car. The maximum penalty of the third count, the felony bail jumping, was
six years in prison.
Salmon plead “no contest” to one OWI count and was sentenced to one year in jail and three years
probation, fined $3,282.85 and had his license revoked for three years.
[State of Wisconsin vs. Thomas Patrick Salmon, Case No. 2003CF000126, 11/03/03]
46
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: This sentence was part of a plea deal involving other cases, where Salmon served an additional
year in jail.
Refused to Prosecute Death of Child Who Died of Gunshot Wound
In 2006, Duffy refused to prosecute the death of a child who died of a gunshot wound nearly two decades
earlier.
“I am writing to inform the citizens of Ashland County of my decision to not prosecute the 1988 death of
Bobby Mayotte,” Duffy stated.
“I understand that some people will agree with my decision to not prosecute, while others may be
frustrated and even angry. As to those who may feel the latter, it is important to understand that this
decision is not a case of prosecutorial discretion; rather, it is the facts of the case and Wisconsin law that
prohibit me from prosecuting this case,” he later explained. [Duffy statement, Daily Press, 1/09/06]
Victim, After Dying of Wound, Was Buried by Other Boys
According to Duffy, Mayotte was buried by the two other boys whom with he was playing guns.
“According to Wade Tutor, on September 17, 1988 Wade, then 11 years old, his brother Francis
Tutor, then 12 years old and Bobby Mayotte, 11 years old, were at a residence in Odanah looking
at magazines when they began ‘playing’ with a lever-action 30-30 rifle. Wade recounted how the
three boys were playing with the gun, loading and unloading it and laughing. Wade states that at
one point all three boys were sitting on the couch when he heard a pop and Bobby fell onto his lap
with a gunshot wound to the head. Concluding that no one would believe that the shooting was an
accident, Wade and Francis decided not to report the incident. Instead, they took Bobby’s body
outside and buried him in the back yard of the residence,” he explained.
Duffy later went on, “Taking the Tutors’ account as true—which I have no physical evidence to
refute—it is my opinion that if their identities had been discovered within three years of the
incident, charges could certainly have been issued for a number of crimes against both Tutors.”
[Duffy statement, Daily Press, 1/09/06]
… But The Boys Didn’t Admit Crimes Until Nearly Two Decades Later
In 2003, Wade Tutor and stated that he and his brother, along with Mayotte, had been playing with
a gun when Mayotte shot and killed himself, and that Tutor and his brother buried Mayotte. [Daily
Press, 1/09/06]
Refused to Push Homicide Charges on Man Who Fought Someone Who Later Died of Heart Attack
In 2004, Duffy refused to push homicide charges on a man after that man fought someone who later died.
“I was going to wait and see what the autopsy came back as. If it came back showing the fight was a
cause of death, we were going to charge a form of homicide,” Duffy said. “Obviously it was heart disease
47
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
he died from, so I can’t show a substantial cause between the fight and the cause of death.” [Daily Press,
7/02/04]
Part of Case Where Judge’s Mother Sat on Jury
In 2006, Duffy was involved in a case where the mother of the presiding judge was a juror. Specifically,
Duffy questioned the mother during jury selection:
DUFFY: “Mrs. Eaton, I know you’re the judge’s mother, do you feel comfortable sitting on a trial
where he’s the judge but he’s not party in the case?”
JUROR EATON: “I don’t think it makes any difference.”
DUFFY: “Doesn’t make any difference one way or the other to you? You have no opinion about
the defendant’s guilt or innocence?”
EATON: “I know nothing about it.”
[State of Wisconsin vs. Mark H Tody Jr, Case No. 2006CF000037, Filed 3/09/06]
However, it was the defendant’s lawyer who tried to remove the judge’s mother from the jury,
“contending she might unduly influence other jurors because of her relationship to the judge.”
The presiding judge ruled to retain his mother as a juror. The defendant later appealed the case, and
ultimately went to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, where the case was overturned and the defendant was
granted a new trial. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/30/09]
Bragged About His Record as County District Attorney
The following outlines Duffy’s description of his time as Ashland County District Attorney:
Claimed His Jury Trial Success Rate Was Above 90 Percent
In 2009, Duffy claimed that his jury trial success rate was above 90 percent. [Superior Telegram,
7/09/09]
Said His Proudest Moment As DA Was Putting Child Predators Behind Bars
In 2010, Duffy said that his proudest moment as Ashland County DA was putting child predators
behind bars. [Duffy RedState interview, 1/13/10]
Touted Work to Convict Child Predators
In 2010, Duffy touted the work he did to convict child predators.
“During my tenure, I’m especially proud of the work my office did in conjunction with Ashland’s
law enforcement agencies to convict child predators,” he said. [Superior Telegram, 6/04/10]
48
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Said He Was Dedicated to Prosecuting Child Sex Crimes
In 2010, Duffy said he was dedicated to prosecuting child sex crimes. [Washingtonian, August 2010]
Involved in Internet Sting to Catch Pedophiles
In 2006, Duffy worked in a sting operation that caught pedophiles who solicited sex from minors
over the internet. [Associated Press, 2/18/06]
49
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Personal Finances
Significant Findings
 Often complained about family’s struggling finances…
 … Despite enjoying well-paying government jobs
 Complained his federal benefits were not as good as state benefits
 Took taxpayer-funded commercial trips, totaling over $12,000 in first seven
months of office
 Drove the latest cars and owned an 18 foot “pleasure” boat
 Family flew in sushi for annual Christmas party
Though Duffy often complained about his family’s struggling finances, in reality his
Duffy has enjoyed well-paying government jobs since 2002. As Ashland County DA,
Duffy earned over twice Ashland County’s median income, and as Congressman,
Duffy earned over four times the county’s median income. Duffy complained that
his new federal benefits were not as good as Wisconsin’s benefits, while taking over
$12,000 in taxpayer-funded commercial trips over his first seven months of office.
Personally, Duffy drove the latest cars and owned an 18 foot “pleasure” boat. His
family also flew in sushi for their annual Christmas party.
Enjoyed Well-Paying Government Jobs
The following outlines Duffy’s well-paying jobs:
Earned Over $80,000 A Year as County DA
As District Attorney for Ashland County, Duffy regularly earned over $80,000 a year:
Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Salary*
$42,912.80
$81,964.88
$82,103.84
$83,072.08
$83,131.36
50
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2007
2008
2009
2010
$88,258.72
$91,979.28
$93,122.64
$48,446.64
[Wisconsin Department of Administration,
accessed 9/23/11]
*NOTE: Excluded fringe benefits.
… While Ashland County’s Median Income Was Nearly $60,000 Less
As of 2009, the median household income for Ashland County was $37,555. [US Census
Bureau, last revised 10/13/11]
Duffy Was Also Paid $40 Per Hour As Special Prosecutor
Between 2000 and 2002, Duffy was regularly paid $40 per hour to work as a special
prosecutor for Ashland County. [Wisconsin Department of Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
NOTE: At the beginning of his hiring as special prosecutor, Duffy’s hourly rate swung
between $50 and $25.
Earned $174,000 Annually as Congressman
In 2011, Duffy made $174,000 annually as a Congressman. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
… An 86 Percent Salary Increase From Duffy’s Previous Job
Duffy’s annual salary increased from $93,122.64 in 2009 to $174,000 to 2011, an 86
percent increase.
Complained His New Federal Benefits Were Not As Good As State Benefits
According to PolitiFact Wisconsin, in 2011, Duffy received new government-provided pension and health
benefits while serving in Congress. However, he complained that his new federal benefits were not as
good as his state benefits.
“The benefits that were offered to me as a congressman don’t even compare to the benefits that you get as
a state employee,” Duffy said. “I just experienced that myself. They’re not nearly as good.” [politifact.com,
2/23/11]
Duffy’s State Health Insurance was Likely Considerably Cheaper than Federal Alternative
According to an analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Duffy’s state health insurance was
likely considerably cheaper than the federal alternative. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/12/11]
51
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… But Likely Received Better Pension Benefits as a Federal Employee than as State
Employee
According to an analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Duffy as a federal employee would
kick in more of his pay to help fund his pension, but would also receive a bigger employer
contribution from Congress. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/12/11]
Took Taxpayer-Funded Commercial Trips Totaling Over $12,000 in First Seven Months of Office
According to his office’s disbursement reports, Duffy has taken many taxpayer-funded commercial trips,
worth $12,285.40, on commercial transportation:
Date
1/11/11
1/15/11
1/20/11
1/23/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/13/11
2/19/11
2/28/11
3/03/11
3/08/11
3/14/11
3/17/11
4/01/11
4/04/11
4/09/11
4/12/11
4/15/11
4/09/11
4/25/11
5/10/11
5/13/11
5/23/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/13/11
6/16/11
Description
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Amount
$304.70
$304.70
$609.40
$521.40
$304.70
$305.40
$25.00
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$413.40
$571.40
$521.40
$304.70
$25.00
$304.70
$571.40
$502.40
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$803.70
$803.70
-$803.70
$521.40
$521.40
-$521.40
$304.70
$571.40
52
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
6/21/11
6/24/11
7/08/11
7/11/11
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
TOTAL
$304.70
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$12,285.40
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
*NOTE: It appears that Duffy was mistakenly reimbursed twice for the same flight, and that he repaid the
reimbursement.
… Then Travel Expenses Were Charged to Duffy’s Official Citibank Government Card
Beginning July 2011, $5,793.51 in travel expenses were charged to Duffy’s official Citibank
Government Card:
Start Date
7/05/11
7/28/11
8/01/11
End Date
7/24/11
8/26/11
8/23/11
Description
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
TOTAL
Amount
$2,773.22
$575.51
$2,444.78
$5,793.51
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
NOTE: The charges to the office’s Citibank Government Card do not indicate they are specifically
for Duffy’s travel expenses. However, given that Duffy’s being reimbursed for commercial
transportation stops abruptly, and charges to the Citibank Government Card then start appearing,
it is likely that Duffy is charging his travel expenses to his office’s Citibank Government Card.
Said He Would Travel Between Wisconsin and DC Each Week
In 2011, Duffy said he would travel between Wisconsin and DC each week.
“I will not be a congressman who lives in Washington, D.C.,” he said. “I love Wisconsin; I will
only live in Wisconsin. So I will travel back and forth every week.” [County Journal, 1/19/11]
Flew In Sushi For Annual Christmas Sushi Party
On a 2007 video for ParentDish, Rachel Duffy described how her family flew in sushi for their annual
Christmas sushi party:
“Every year my family throws a sushi party at Christmas. I know that sounds kind of nontraditional, but you’d be surprised at how much people enjoy the party. I fly the sushi from
somewhere else. I live in Wisconsin, so I can’t get it any other way. But it’s really easy, I
get on the internet, I order it—flies in the next day. I cook up a pot of me so smooth, I
steam some edamame and I make some white rice. Everybody comes over and they love to
get involved in making the sushi.” [Rachel Campos-Duffy on ParentDish, De-Stressing the Holidays]
53
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… And Duffy Bought Sushi-Grade Fish to Make Sushi for His Wife
In 2009, Rachel Duffy described how Sean Duffy would buy “sushi-grade fish to make homemade
sushi for me.”
“We both love sushi, but I think what I love most is that since he enjoys rolling sushi, I don’t have
to do anything!” she wrote. [P. 223, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Drove the Latest Cars
The following outlines the cars Duffy drove:
2001: Drove 2000 Mitsubishi Montero
In 2001, Duffy drove a 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. [Sawyer County Sheriff’s Department; Hayward Police
Department, Citation #B388469-R; Hayward Police Department, Citation #B388469-R]
NOTE: A later police report from the Ashland Police Department indicated that Duffy owned a
2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse (Indicated as “2000 MITS ECL”). It is unclear whether he owned the
Eclipse in earlier years, or whether Duffy actually owned the car he was driving in 2001.
2010: Drove 2009 Volkswagen Jetta
In 2010, Duffy drove a 2009 Volkswagen Jetta. [Ashland Police Department, Incident Report Form, A2-1004188, 6/22/10]
NOTE: It is unclear whether Duffy owns this car. A June 2010 police report indicated the car was
“2009 Volk Jet” – suggesting a 2009 Volkswagen Jetta – with plates “767NEE”. But a December
2010 police report indicated the car was “2009 Volk Jet” – suggesting a similar car – with
different plates, “206RHZ”.
2010: Drove 2005 Chrysler Town and Country
In 2010, Duffy drove a 2005 Chrysler Town and Country minivan. [Ashland Police Department,
Incident Report Form, A2-11-02958, 5/08/11]
Owned Pleasure Boat Since 2001
Since 2001, Duffy has owned a pleasure boat.
One he owned from 2001 to 2007, and another he owned from 2007 to present:
2007-Present: Owned 18 Foot Pleasure Boat
Since 2007, Duffy has been the registered owner of an 18 foot pleasure boat.
54
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to the state Department of Natural Resources, Duffy’s boat was a 1996 Bayliner
1850SS Capri. [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
Explicitly Indicated Boat Would Be Used for Pleasure
According to Duffy’s registration, the boat would be used for pleasure:
[Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
2001-2007: Owned Pleasure 16 Foot Boat
Between 2001 and 2007, Duffy held the registration for a 16 foot pleasure boat, which he also
indicated he would use for pleasure:
[Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
Family Decided They Liked That “Daddy Makes Money”
55
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
On a list of “Things We Like” that the Duffy family compiled in 2009, they listed “Daddy makes money.”
[P. 78, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Often Complained About Family’s Struggling Finances
Duffy and his wife often talked about their family’s struggling finances:
2011: “I Have More Debt Than All Of You” and “I Struggle To Meet My Bills Right Now”
During a 2011 town hall meeting, Duffy told a constituent, “I have more debt than all of you.”
“With six kids, I still pay off my student loans. I still pay my mortgage. I drive a used minivan,”
Duffy said. “If you think I’m living high on the hog, I’ve got one paycheck. So I struggle to meet
my bills right now.” [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
Later Admitted His Words Were “Poorly Chosen”
Shortly after he made his statement, Duffy admitted his words were “poorly chosen.”
[Central Wisconsin Sunday, 4/03/11]
2011: Complained that Federal Benefits Did Not Compare to State Benefits
In 2011, Duffy complained that federal benefits did not compare to Wisconsin’s state benefits.
“The benefits that were offered to me as a congressman don’t even compare to the benefits that
you get as a state employee. I just experienced that myself. They’re not nearly as good,” he said.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 3/29/11]
Fact Check Group Rated Duffy’s Complaint “Half-True”
In 2011, fact check group PolitiFact Wisconsin rated Duffy’s complaint “half-true”.
“Duffy apparently selected one of the higher-priced health plans, but won’t say which one,
so we can’t do an exact comparison. But looking at the plans offered, we found potentially
much higher health insurance costs for federal workers, depending on which plan and what
level of coverage an employee wants. But we found a far less significant gap -- and some
federal advantages -- on retirement benefits,” it explained. [politifact.com, 2/23/11]
2011: Slept in His Office, Citing Cost of Second Home
In 2011, Duffy slept in his Congressional office, citing the cost of a second home. [cbsnews.com,
1/22/11]
2010: Said His Family Lived On A Budget
In a 2010 op-ed, Duffy wrote that his family lived on a budget.
56
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“My family, like many families in northern and central Wisconsin, lives on a budget, and I believe
the government should, too,” he wrote. [Duffy op-ed, Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 9/24/10]
2010: Claimed Insurance Did Not Cover His First Son’s Birth
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy claimed that insurance did not cover the expenses regarding
his first son’s birth. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
2008: Wife Cited Low Cost-of-Living As “Important Factor” For Deciding Where to Live
In a 2008 interview with People Magazine, Duffy’s wife Rachel cited low cost of living as an
“important factor” for deciding where to live.
“Also, it’s possible to have a one-income household because the cost of living is lower. That was
an important factor for both of us in deciding where to live and raise our family,” she said.
[people.com, 4/01/08]
Skeptical of Paying Teachers’ Salaries Because They’re Too High on the “Food Chain”
In 2010, Duffy was skeptical of stimulus funding paying teachers’ salaries because teachers were too high
on the economic “food chain.”
“The teacher jobs are good jobs, I believe in education,” Duffy said. “But those salaries come from those
in the community who have jobs and pay taxes, and if you don’t stimulate the private sector so they can
pay their taxes which pay the teachers, the whole system breaks down.”
“So to think we are just going up one step up the food chain and just take care of the teachers but not take
care of the people who actually take care of the teacher’s salary, the taxpayer, it doesn’t work. It can’t
work. You will keep them for a year or two, but if this thing doesn’t grow, they will have to be laid-off at
some point because there is not enough tax base to support them, which is basic common sense.” [Spooner
Advocate, 3/07/10]
Enjoyed “Family Spa Night” with “Essential Oil” Massages
In 2009, Rachel Duffy described how her family enjoyed “family spa night,” which included using
“essential oil” for massages for their children:
“There are plenty of easy things you can do even on a weeknight. If my husband and I
know we have an extra half hour after bath time, we announce that it’s family spa night,
and the kids squeal with joy! After their baths, they come in their bathrobes to our bed and
select an essential oil for their foot and hand massages. After Sean and I give massages if
there’s time, we also paint the girls’ nails. It’s simple, fun, and cheap.” [P. 82, Stay Home, Stay
Happy]
Rachel Duffy Lived Lavish Lifestyle
57
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines Rachel Duffy’s lavish lifestyle:
Rachel Duffy Used A Personal Shopper and Bought Clothes from LA Boutiques
On a video for ParentDish, Rachel Duffy described how she used a personal shopper at department
stores and buys from “hip and cool boutiques” in New York and LA through the Internet:
Here is how I stay in fashion, even though I live four hours from the nearest fashion
Mecca. First I plan ahead! Before I make that long trip to the shopping mall I call
and get a personal shopper. It is a little known fact, that personal shopping is
actually free service provided by department stores. Believe me; this is going to
save you a ton of time! Here is what you do first, make a list of all of the things you
need from your closest. Then call and tell your personal shopper what you need.
Now, make sure your personal shopper understands your fashion sensibility. When
you get to the mall you will be amazed, because all of the best things will be pulled
from the racks before you arrive, and it will all be in your size. Now, if you want to
bring the best boutiques and young hip designers right into your home you can by
going online. I’m not talking about all those websites from department stores with
all the labels we all know. I’m talking about hip and cool boutiques from New
York and L.A.. You will be amazed about how many are actually online right now.
And that his how I stay in vogue. [Rachel Campos-Duffy for GMC]
NOTE: It is unclear when Rachel Duffy made this video.
Rachel Duffy Talked About Buying Expensive Jeans and Sweatpants
On a 2007 video for ParentDish, Rachel Duffy described how she bought expensive sweatpants
and jeans, and bought a new pair of sun glasses every season:
And I put all my wardrobe budget into buying things that really work for me on a
daily basis. Things that I really get to enjoy. Like sweatpants, I don’t have cheap
pair of sweatpants. I have a pair of sweatpants that’s cut right and I wear
everyday—they are super comfortable. And jeans! I think jeans are so important.
Again, because it is an everyday item. These I paid way too much money for, ask
my husband. But they fit great and I like them so much I actually bought them in
Capri, because I knew I was going to wear them all the time. Evening bags, look,
look at how many useless evening bags I have. When all I really use is this one
everyday. I don’t have time anymore to switch things out of my purse—so this is
just perfect. Umm, and shoes. Uh, I mean look, I’m a shoe hound, so I’m not
saying you shouldn’t buy great shoes, but spend money on the ones you wear
everyday as well. And a rubber band, I always have a rubber band around because I
think pony tails are the best solutions to bad hair days. And the dirtier your hair is
the better your ponytail looks—it just kinda slicks back. So umm, I never let the
hair stylist cut my hair so short that I can’t put it into a ponytail. Maybe, your
solution is a hat but whatever it is find some low maintenance solution to your hair
troubles. And finally sunglasses. Sunglasses are the easiest way to look fashionable
58
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
and it doesn’t cost a lot of money. I buy a new pair every season so I kinda look
hip.” [Rachel Campos-Duffy on ParentDish, Everyday Style]
Rachel Duffy Complained Her Bathroom Was Size of Small Closet
In 2009, Rachel Duffy complained that her Ashland home’s bathroom was the size of a small
closet. [P. 190, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Rachel Duffy Used Hired Help Twice Each Week to Clean House
In 2009, Rachel Duffy used hired help twice a week to help clean the Duffy’s home.
“Now, with five kids under the age of ten, I have someone come to help me clean twice a week for
two hours a day,” Duffy wrote. [P. 108, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Rachel Duffy Described The Stress of Having Two Renovations At Once
On a 2007 video for ParentDish, Rachel Duffy described the stress of her two “renovation
projects”:
I love the after of any renovation! But the before part, ugh, it just drives me nuts! I
have two renovation projects ahead of me. I have a home office that I’m trying to
redo and make it functional and I have an exterior [project]. I think I’m kind of
nervous about everything because I’ve made mistakes before in the past. With my
first house I picked the colors… I picked a yellow to do the exterior with—I
thought it was a really pretty subtle yellow. But when the paint actually went up
and the sun hit it, it was way too bright and people started calling the house the
canary house… Because then, you know, they come and they do what they do, and
then they leave and I’m kind of annoyed with the tracks of mud that came in or the
equipment they left out that the kids were getting into. [Rachel Campos-Duffy on
ParentDish, Managing and Planning Home Development]
59
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… State Disclosures (2001-2009)
The following outlines Duffy’s investments, liabilities, and employers.
Investments
The following outlines Duffy and his family’s investments:
Year
2009
Name
Federated US
Government
Securities 2-5yrs
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Vanguard Admiral
Treasury Money
Market (through
Wisconsin Deferred
Comp.)
Stable Value
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Type
Bond
$5,000 - $50,000
Money Market
$5,000 - $50,000
Fixed Returns
$5,000 - $50,000
TOTAL
2008
BGI EAFE Equity
Index (through
Wisconsin Deferred
Comp.)
Fidelity Contrafund
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Federated US
Government
Securities 2-5yrs
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
2007
$15,000 - $150,000
International
Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Large Cap Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Bond
$5,000 - $50,000
TOTAL
American Funds
Euro Pacific R5
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
BGI EAFE Equity
Index – Collective W
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Fidelity Contra Fund
Amount
$15,000 - $150,000
International
Fund
Under $50,000
International
Fund
Under $50,000
Large Cap Fund
Under $50,000
60
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Federated US
Government
Securities 2-5yr
(through Wisconsin
Deferred Comp.)
Bond
Under $50,000
TOTAL
2006
Fidelity Contra Fund
(through Wisconsin
Deferred
Compensation
program)
Alliance Bernstein
Disciplined Value
Alliance Growth
Eaton Vance
Worldwide Health
Science
Pfizer Inc.
Q Logic Corp
Large Cap Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Mutual Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Mutual Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Mutual Fund
$5,000 - $50,000
Stock
Stock
TOTAL
2005
Cisco Systems Inc.
Microsoft Corp.
QLGC
PFE
Stock
Stock
Stock
Stock
Cisco Systems Inc
Microsoft Corp
Alliance Bernstein
Disciplined Val B
Alliance Growth
Eaton Vance
Stock
Stock
TOTAL
2004
2003
2002
Cisco Systems Inc
EMC Corporation
Microsoft Corp
Alliance Bernstein
Disciplined Val B
Alliance Growth
Eaton Vance
CISCO Systems
EMC Corporation
Intel Corp
$0 - $200,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$30,000 - $300,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$0 - $200,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Mutual Fund
Under $50,000
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
TOTAL
Stock
Stock
Stock
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$0 - $250,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Mutual Fund
Under $50,000
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
TOTAL
Stock
Stock
Stock
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$0 - $300,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
61
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
AllianceBerstein
Disciplined Val B
Eaton Vance
Worldwide Health C
Mutual Fund
Under $50,000
Mutual Fund
Under $50,000
TOTAL
2001
CSCO
MSFT
EMC
INTE
ADGBX
ECHSX
AGBBX
Stock
Stock
Stock
Stock
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
TOTAL
$0 - $250,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$0 - $350,000
[Statement of Financial Interest]
Liabilities
The following outlines Duffy and his family’s liabilities:
Year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Name
Wells Fargo Financial
Chase Auto Finance
Johnson Bank
US Bank Home Mortgage
CitiBank Student Loans
TOTAL
Bank of America (cct student loan)
Northern State Bank
Superior Community Credit Union
Wells Fargo Financial
TOTAL
Northern State Bank
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
Superior Community Credit Union
Wells Fargo Financial
Bank of America
TOTAL
Northern State Bank
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
Wells Fargo & Co.
Superior Community Credit Union
TOTAL
Johnson Bank
Amount
$5,000 - $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
Over $50,000
Over $50,000
$115,000 - $250,000+
Over $50,000
Over $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$110,000 - $200,000+
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$100,000 - $300,000+
Over $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
Over $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$5,000 - $50,000
$115,000 - $250,000+
Under $50,000
62
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
MBNA
Northern State Bank
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
Wells Fargo
TOTAL
2004
CitiBank
Johnson Bank
MBNA
Northern State Bank
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
TOTAL
2003
2002
2001
CitiBank
Johnson Bank
MBNA
Mitsubishi Motors
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
Nothern State Bank
TOTAL
CitiBank
Johnson Bank
MBNA
Mitsubishi Motors
Peoples National Bank of Hayward
Sallie Mae
Suntech Loans
TOTAL
Suntech Loans
Sallie Mae
Mitsubishi
Johnson Bank
Peoples National Bank
MBNA
CitiBank
TOTAL
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
$100,000 - $300,000+
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
$100,000 - $300,000+
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Over $50,000
$150,000 - $350,000+
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
$100,000 - $350,000+
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Over $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
Under $50,000
$100,000 - $350,000+
[Statements of Financial Interest]
Employers
The following outlines Duffy and his family’s employers:
Year
2009
Name
Lumberjack Shows
Description
Lumberjack Competition
63
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
International
State of WI – District Attorney
Penguin Books
America Online
Lumberjack Shows
International
State of WI – District Attorney
Lumberjack Shows
International
State of WI – District Attorney
America Online
State of WI – District Attorney
Lumberjack Shows
International
ESPN
State of WI – District Attorney
Synergy Management
State of WI – District Attorney
ESPN
Lifetime TV for Women
State of WI – Department of
Administration – DA
ESPN
American Broadcast Company
Linton Productions / Kraft
State of WI – Department of
Administration – DA
ESPN
Yugar Productions
Bunim-Murray Productions
ESPN
Dept. of Justice – District Atty
Yugar Productions
Bunim-Murry Productions
State Government
Publish Wife’s Book
Video & Blogging Online
Lumberjack Competition
State Government
Lumberjack Competition
State Government
Video & Blogging Online
State Government
Lumberjack Competition
Lumberjack Competition
State Government
TV Host
State Government
Lumberjack Competition
TV Host
State Government
Lumberjack Competition
TV Host
TV Host
State Government
Lumberjack Competition
Speaking Tour
TV Game Show
Lumberjack competition
Special Prosecutor
Speaking Tour
TV Game Show
[Statements of Financial Interest]
64
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Federal Disclosures (2010-Present)
The following outlines Duffy’s financial disclosures, along with the several significant
discrepancies between them.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Several Discrepancies on Personal Financial Reports
There were several discrepancies between the various personal financial reports filed by Duffy:
Debt Was Halved Between Official and Campaign Financial Disclosure Filings
According to a 2011 analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, between his first financial
disclosure in May 2010 and his second in June 2011, Duffy cut his personal debt in half.
Duffy’s spokesperson explained that the discrepancy was due to Duffy’s not including his home
mortgage on his later financial disclosure, since members of Congress were not required to do so.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/22/11]
Failed to List Several Investments
According to a 2011 analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Duffy failed to list several
investments worth between $1,000 and $15,000 on his later financial report.
Duffy’s spokesperson explained, “They were sold during the disclosure period, and the value for
each should have been listed as ‘none.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/22/11]
Blamed Discrepancies On Overreporting
According to Duffy and his spokesman, the discrepancies were the result of an honest
mistake and of overreporting.
They claimed that Duffy had sold some of his assets but failed to report it on his 2011
statement, and that the debt reduction was of Duffy’s not reporting his home mortgage
liability on his 2011 report as he did on his 2010. [Herald Times Reporter, 6/24/11]
Salary as County DA Grew in Final Days of Job
According to a 2011 analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Duffy’s salary as County DA
increased from approximately $1,800 a week to over $2,000 a week in the final days of his job.
Duffy had no explanation for the salary uptick. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/22/11]
Later Called Salary Back Pay
When asked why he was paid $12,312 after filing his 2010 disclosure, Duffy explained
that it was back pay he was owed after he had resigned.
65
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“I had no ability to set my own pay or give myself a raise,” he said. [Herald Times Reporter,
6/24/11]
… And Denied That His Salary Actually Increased
In 2011, Duffy’s spokesperson blamed Wisconsin’s payroll system for the discrepancy
between his reported salary as County DA, denying that Duffy’s pay actually increased.
“There is a lag between the pay periods and the payday. (Duffy’s) financial disclosure did
not reflect the lag in payment,” his spokesperson explained.
“There was no increase in DA Duffy’s pay.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/22/11]
Earned Income
The following outlines Duffy’s earned income:
2010 Form A:
Source
WI Department of District Attorneys
Lumberjack Sports International
St. Hl Timbersports
AOL
The Periguine Group
Linda Ellman Productions
Type
Salary
Salary
Salary
Spouse Salary
Spouse Salary
Spouse Salary
TOTAL
Current
$34,000
$0
$0
$1,200
$0
$0
$35,200
Preceding
$94,000
$2,500
$2,000
$4,800
$50,000
$1,200
$154,500
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
2010 Form B:
Source
WI Department of District Attorneys
AOL
Type
Salary
Spouse Salary
TOTAL
Current
$34,000
$1,200
$35,200
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
Assets and Unearned Income
The following outlines Duffy’s assets and unearned income:
2010 Form A:
Name
Wells Fargo Checking
Value
$1,001-$15,000
Type
Interest
Current
$1-$200
66
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Preceding
$1-$200
Wells Fargo Checking
6464 McCarry Lake
Road, Iron River WI
Northern State Bank
Savings Account
American Funds Euro
Pacific RS
Vanguard Admiral
Treasury Money Market
Federal US Government
Securities 2-5 Year
Stable Value
T Rowe Price Mid Cap
Growth Fund
DFA US Micro Cap Fund
VGI EAFE Equity Index
Collective T
Fidelity Contra Fund
Vanguard Target
Retirement 2045 Fund
Eaton Vance Growth
Fund Trust Worldwide
Health Science FDL
Eaton Vance Large Cap
Core Fund LLE
Capital Income Builder
Fund LLA
Growth Fund of America
CLA
Eaton Vance Large Cap
Core Fund CLL
TOTAL
$1-$1,000
Interest
$1-$200
$1-$200
$100,001-$250,000
None
None
None
None
Interest
None
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
None
None
$1-$1,000
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$1-$1,000
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$0
None
$0
$0
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
Capital
Gains
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
$1-$200
$201-$1,000
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
$1-$200
$201-$1,000
$8-$1,600
$409-$3,400
$1,001-$15,000
$112,016-$433,000
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
2010 Form B:
Name
Def Comp – Amer Fund
Europacific
Def Comp – Federated
US Gov’t Securities
Def Comp – Stable Value
Def Comp – T Rowe
Price Mid Cap
Def Comp – Vanguard
Admiral Treasury
Value
Type
Current
Preceding
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
67
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
IRA – Capital Income
Builder A
IRA – Eaton Vance
Large Cap Core C
IRA – Eaton Vance
Large Core Value C
IRA – Eaton Vance
Worldwide Health
Science FD
Real Estate – Iron River
WI
TOTAL
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$100,001-$250,000
None
None
None
$0
$0
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
NOTE: The table above omits Duffy’s wife’s IRA in Growth Fund America CLA.
Where’s the Money? Missing Investments on Duffy’s Form B Disclosure
Though Duffy’s form A disclosure covered his investments from January 1, 2010 through May
15th, 2010, and his form B disclosure covered Duffy’s investments through all of 2010, there were
investments on form A that did not appear on form B.
Specifically the following investments did not appear on Duffy’s form B disclosure:
Name
Wells Fargo Checking
Wells Fargo Checking
Northern State Bank
Savings Account
DFA US Micro Cap Fund
VGI EAFE Equity Index
Collective T
Fidelity Contra Fund
Vanguard Target
Retirement 2045 Fund
TOTAL
Value
$1,001-$15,000
$1-$1,000
Type
Interest
Interest
Current
$1-$200
$1-$200
Preceding
$1-$200
$1-$200
None
Interest
None
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
Capital
Gains
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$3-$600
$4-$800
$1,001-$15,000
$109,010-$385,000
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
Where’s the Money… Again? Missing Income on Duffy’s Form B Disclosure
Though Duffy’s form A disclosure indicated that certain investments generated income, Duffy’s
later form B indicated that none of his investments generated income.
Specifically, the following investments generated income during 2010 on Form A but not on Form
B:
68
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Form
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Investment
Federal US Government Securities 2-5 Year
Def Comp – Federated US Gov’t Securities
Vanguard Admiral Treasury Money Market
Def Comp – Vanguard Admiral Treasury
Capital Income Builder Fund LLA
IRA – Capital Income Builder A
Eaton Vance Large Cap Core Fund CLL
IRA – Eaton Vance Large*
Eaton Vance Growth Fund Trust Worldwide
Health Science FDL
IRA – Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Science
FD
Type of
Income
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Current
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
Dividends
$1-$200
None
None
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
*NOTE: Duffy’s Form A disclosure has two Eaton Vance “Large Cap Core” investments, while his Form
B disclosure has one “Large Cap Core Value” investment and another “Large Core Value” investment –
neither of which appears to clearly correspond.
Who Has the Money? Forms Indicate Different Owners Same Investment
According to Duffy’s Form A disclosure, Growth Fund of America CLA was one of his personal
investments, worth between $1,001 and $15,000. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
However, according to his form B disclosure, Growth Fund of America CLA was one of his
wife’s investments, worth between $1,001 and $15,000. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
Liabilities
The following outlines Duffy’s liabilities:
2010 Form A:
Joint
Joint
Creditor
Student Loan
Corporation
Northern State Bank
Johnson Bank
Wells Fargo
Bank of America
Liability
Student Loan
Amount
$50,001-$100,000
Misc Debt – Iron River Cabin
Mis Debt – Taken for Iron River prop.
Credit card & Line of debt
Home mortgage
TOTAL
$100,001-$250,000
$15,001-$50,000
$15,001-$50,000
$250,001-$500,000
$430,005-$950,000
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
2010 Form B:
69
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Joint
Creditor
Johnson Bank
Liability
Mis Debt – Taken for
Iron River prop.
Student Loan
Corporation
Northern State Bank
Joint Wells Fargo
Joint Wells Fargo
Joint Bank of America
Student Loan
Misc Debt – Iron
River Cabin
Line of Credit
Credit card
Credit Card
Date Incurred
2010
1990
2009
2003
2005
2000
TOTAL
Amount
$15,001-$50,000
$50,001-$100,000
$100,001-$250,000
$15,001-$50,000
$15,001-$50,000
$15,001-$50,000
$210,006-$550,000
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
Where’s the Money? Home Mortgage Missing from Form B
Though Duffy reported a home mortgage on his Form A disclosure, he does not report the
mortgage on his Form B disclosure. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
NOTE: It is possible that Duffy paid off his home mortgage by the end of 2010, thereby
eliminating the need for him to report it as a debt on the Form B disclosure.
Where’s the Money? Credit Card Missing from Form A
Though Duffy reported on his Form B disclosure that he and his wife have jointly had a Bank of
America credit card from 2000, he failed to report the card on his earlier form A disclosure. [2010
Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
Who Has the Money? Forms Indicate Different Owners Same Liability
According to Duffy’s Form A disclosure, he personally held the mortgage on his Iron River
property. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
However, according to his form B disclosure, he and his wife jointly held the mortgage on the Iron
River property. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
Positions
The following outlines Duffy’s positions:
2010 Form A:
Position
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Board of Directors
Name
Republican Party of Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District
Republican Party of Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District
Chequamegon Natural Foods Co-Op, Ashland CUD
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
70
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2010 Form B: No Positions Reported
According to Duffy’s 2010 Form B personal financial disclosure, he reported holding no positions
during that year. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure – Form B]
Granted Extra Time to File Financial Disclosure
In 2011, Duffy was granted a 30-day extension to file his financial disclosure. [Herald Times Reporter,
6/16/11]
71
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Property Ownership
Significant Findings
 Paid property taxes late 12 times
 Owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to his home
 Owned 14 different properties since 2000
Duffy has actively bought and sold 14 different properties since 2000, including
three different homes and seven different lakefront properties. Moreover, Duffy
paid property taxes late 12 times, racking up $629.19 in interest and $256.70 in
penalties for $15,720.13 in late property taxes.
Paid Property Taxes Late 12 Times
As of 2011, Duffy has paid his property taxes late 12 times:
County
Ashland
Bayfield
Oneida
Sawyer
Year
2007
2005
2005
2005
2003
2003
2003
2001
2001
2000
2000
1999
Property
201-04871-0000
201-4834-0000
201-0401-0000
004-1118-01-990
MI-2147-1A
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
236-941-21-4411
TOTAL
Tax
$984.17
$4,732.09
$1,914.13
$2,953.91
$630.25
$368.74
$842.64
$334.74
$764.96
$306.48
$724.68
$1,163.34
$15,720.13
Interest
$60.56
$236.20
$95.71
$29.54
$34.66
$12.90
$29.49
$3.35
$40.71
$6.13
$39.22
$40.72
$629.19
Penalty
$30.28
$118.10
$47.85
*$0
$17.33
$3.23
$7.37
$0.84
$10.19
$1.53
$9.80
$10.18
$256.70
[Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11;
Bayfield County Treasurer, accessed 9/21/11;
Oneida County Treasurer, accessed 9/20/11;
Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
*NOTE: Bayfield County does not charge a penalty for late taxes.
Owned Seven Different Lakefront Properties in Addition to Home
Since 2003, Duffy has owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to his home:
72
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Year
2008-2011
2006
2005-2006
2003-2005
2002-2005
2000-2004
2003
Location
Iron River
Bass Lake
Barnes
Hayward
Minocqua
Bass Lake
Hayward
[Parcel #024-1124-03-000, Ashland County;
Parcel #002-109-63-0302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #004-1118-01-990, Bayfield County;
Parcel #010-171-00-4302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #MI-2147-1A, Oneida County;
Parcel #002-145-01-0100 and #002-157-01-0100, Sawyer County;
Parcel #002-940-33-5312, Sawyer County]
NOTE: Duffy potentially also owned lakefront property in White River between 2006 and 2008. However,
the address of the property was unavailable.
2011-Present: Owned Property in Weston
In October 2011, the Wausau Daily Herald reported that Duffy moved to Weston. [Wausau Daily Herald,
10/13/11]
NOTE: For further information regarding Duffy’s Weston home, consult the Outstanding Questions
appendix.
2004-Present: Owned Property in Ashland
In 2004, Duffy and his wife bought a property at 2906 City Heights Road in Ashland, WI 54806. [Parcel
#201-4834-0000; Mortgage, Document #X295107, Ashland County, 11/30/04]
The Duffys bought the property from John and Linda Cesnik. [Warranty Deed, Document #X295106, Ashland
County, 11/26/04]
73
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[bing.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s Ashland property:
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
TOTAL
Tax
$4,732.09
$4,420.61
$4,902.70
$4,741.46
$5,028.14
$5,096.12
$28,921.12
Interest
$236.20
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236.20
Penalties
$118.10
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$118.10
[Parcel #201-4834-0000, Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11]
Was Rental Property in 2004-2005
Between 2004 and 2005, Duffy rented his City Heights Road property. [Duffy Statements of Economic
Interests]
Valued At $215,700 as of 2011
As of 2011, the Duffys’ home was valued at $215,700. [Ashland County Assessor, accessed 9/19/11]
Property Had Five Bedrooms and Five Acres
According to Rachel Duffy, their property in Ashland was “a two-story, five-bedroom
home with five acres of woods.” [P. 190, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Property Had At-Home Gym with A “Total Gym” and Elliptical Machine
74
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2009, Rachel Duffy described her family’s at-home gym, writing, “I have a spin bike
and an elliptical machine. For toning, I have dumbbells, an exercise ball and a Total Gym.
I also have a Windsor Pilates tape.” [P. 49, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Ashland property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $174,000
Less than a week after buying the property, the Duffys took out a mortgage on it for
$174,000. [Mortgage, Document #X295107, Ashland County, 11/30/04]
They then paid the mortgage off less than a year later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #X299544, Ashland County, 10/26/05]
Took Out Second Mortgage on Property for $18,500
In 2005, the Duffys took out a mortgage on their property for $18,500. [Mortgage, Document
#X296868, Ashland County, 4/26/05]
They then paid off the mortgage the following month. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #X297106, Ashland County, 5/12/05]
Took Out Third Mortgage on This and Another Property for $235,000
In 2005, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $235,000. [Mortgage, Document #X299519, Ashland County, 10/21/05]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2007. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #309609,
Ashland County, 11/21/07]
NOTE: Though the mortgage indicates the parcel number of the Beaser Avenue property,
the legal description does not match. No evidence was found explaining why.
Took Out Fourth Mortgage on This and Another Property for $27,000
In 2006, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $27,000. [Mortgage, Document #303563, Ashland County, 8/17/06]
They were partially released from the mortgage in 2007. [Partial Release of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #309610, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
The Duffys were completely released from the mortgage in 2008. [Satisfaction of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #312594, Ashland County, 7/30/08]
75
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Took Out Fifth Mortgage on This and Another Property for $232,000
In 2007, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $232,000. [Mortgage, Document #309611, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
The mortgage was transferred to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems that day.
[Assignment of Mortgage, Document #309612, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
The Duffys then paid off the mortgage in 2009. [Mortgage Release, Document #314577, Ashland
County, 2/12/09]
Took Out Sixth Mortgage on Property for $256,000
In 2009, the Duffys took out a mortgage on the property for $256,000. [Mortgage, Document
#314196, Ashland County, 1/13/09]
2008-2011: Owned Lakefront Property in Iron River
In 2008, Duffy and his wife bought a property at 64640 McCarry Lake Road in Iron River, WI. [Parcel
#024-1124-03-000]
The Duffys bought the property from Maureen Yaskal, Eileen Marciniak, and the life estate of James
McAullife. [Warranty Deed, Document #2008R-521475, Bayfield County, 6/19/08]
They then sold the property in 2011. [Warranty Deed, Document #2011R-539741, Bayfield County, 8/10/11]
[bing.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Tax History
76
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines the tax history for Duffy’s property:
Year
2008*
2009
2010
TOTAL
Tax
$3,151.70
$3,386.18
$3,385.10
$9,922.98
Interest
Penalties
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
[Parcels #024-1124-03-000, Bayfield County Treasurer, accessed 9/21/11]
NOTE: It is unclear whether Duffy or the previous owners paid the property taxes for this year.
Valued At $190,900
In 2010, the property was valued at $190,900. [Bayfield County Assessor, accessed 11/09/11]
Applied to Build New Cabin on Property
In 2009, the Duffys applied for and were granted a variance to demolish the existing cabin on the
property and build a new one.
The original cabin was 28’ by 32’, 8’ from the high water mark of Twin Bear Lake, and the new
cabin would be 30’ by 30’, 44’ from the high water mark. [Decision of Variance by Board of Adjustment,
2009R-527978, Bayfield County, 6/04/09]
… Then Tried to Sell Property for $229,900
In 2010, the Duffys advertised their Iron River property for sale, asking $229,900.
“PIKE CHAIN OF LAKES! Exactly what you imagine for a cabin on the lake; close to the
waters edge, beautiful sand beach and privacy on your own peninsula. Permission has
already been granted to build on this lot,” the description read. [vanhollen.com, updated 6/11/10]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $180,000
The day they bought the Iron River property, the Duffys took out a mortgage on it for
$180,000. [Mortgage, Document #2008R-521476, Bayfield County, 6/19/08]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2011. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #2011R539806, Bayfield County, 8/15/11]
2006-2008: Owned Property in White River
77
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2006, Duffy and his wife, along with Joseph Waller and Charles Rasmussen, bought a property in
White River, WI. [Parcel #026-00696-0300]
The group bought the property from Rick Thomas. [Warranty Deed, Document #302376, Ashland County, 5/22/06]
They later sold part of the property to Chris Kerkes in 2008. [Warranty Deed, Document #312864, Ashland
County, 8/25/08]
The Duffys then sold their portion of the remaining property to Joseph Waller and Charles Rasmussen in
2008. [Quit Claim Deed, Document #313439, Ashland County, 10/17/08]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s property:
Year
2006
2007
TOTAL
Tax
$1,227.54
$1,368.42
$2,595.96
Interest
Penalties
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
[Parcel #026-00696-0300, Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11]
Valued at $83,300
As of 2008, the total value of Duffy’s property was $83,300. [Ashland County Assessor, accessed
11/09/11]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $87,000
Days before they became owners of the property, the group took out a mortgage on the
property for $87,000. [Mortgage, Document #302377, Ashland County, 5/18/06]
They were then partially released from the mortgage in 2008. [Partial Release of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #313249, Ashland County, 10/01/08]
The group was completely released from the mortgage later that month. [Satisfaction of Real
Estate Mortgage, Document #313513, Ashland County, 10/29/08]
Agreed to Restrictive Covenants on Part of Their Property
In 2008, the Duffys and their co-owners agreed to restrictive covenants for their property. The
covenants included restrictions on what sort of buildings could be built, and how animals could be
kept on the property. [Restrictive Covenants, Document #312863, Ashland County, 825/08]
78
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: This was the portion of the group’s property that they sold the same day to Chris Kerkes in
2008.
2001-2008: Owned Home in Ashland
In 2001, Duffy and his wife bought a home at 512 Beaser Avenue in Ashland, WI 54806. [Parcel #201-04010000; Mortgage, Document #X274867, Ashland County, 7/23/01]
The Duffys bought the property from Jackie Johnson. [Warranty Deed, Document #X274866, Ashland County,
7/23/01]
They later sold the property to Lorraine Fish in 2008. [Warranty Deed, Document #312230, Ashland County,
6/30/08]
[bing.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s Ashland property:
Year
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
TOTAL
Tax
$1,452.16
$1,953.57
$1,914.13
$1,791.21
$1,986.55
$9,097.62
Interest
Penalties
$0
$0
$95.71
$0
$0
$95.71
$0
$0
$47.85
$0
$0
$47.85
[Parcel #201-0401-0000, Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11]
NOTE: Property taxes prior to 2003 were unavailable.
Valued at $87,400
79
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
As of 2008, the total value of Duffy’s property was $87,400. [Ashland County Assessor, accessed
11/09/11]
Property Was Considered Duffy’s Homestead
In 2001, the Duffys indicated that their property was their homestead. [Warranty Deed, Document
#X274866, Ashland County, 7/23/01]
NOTE: It appears that the Duffys subsequently transferred homestead status to a different
property. A 2006 mortgage identified their City Heights Road property as their home.
Was Rental Property in 2006-2007
Between 2006 and 2007, Duffy rented his 512 Beaser Avenue property. [Statement of Economic
Interests, 1/08/07]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Ashland property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $68,250
The day that they bought their property in Ashland, the Duffys took out a mortgage on it
for $68,250. [Mortgage, Document #X274867, Ashland County, 7/23/01]
They then paid off the mortgage the following year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #281672, Ashland County, 9/06/02]
Took Out Second Mortgage on Property for $25,000
In 2002, the Duffys took out a second mortgage from Johnson Bank on their property for
$25,000. [Mortgage, Document #X278518, Ashland County, 1/29/02]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2005. [Satisfaction of Mortgage, Document #X296895, Ashland
County, 2/13/02]
Later Made Subordinate to Third Mortgage
Later in 2002, the Duffys’ mortgage from Johnson Bank for $25,000 was made
subordinate to their mortgage from Northern State Bank for $80,000. [Subordination
Agreement, Document #X282266, Ashland County, 10/02/02]
Took Out Third Mortgage on Property for $80,000
In 2002, the Duffys took out a third mortgage from Northern State Bank on their property
for $80,000. [Mortgage, Document #X281707, Ashland County, 8/30/02]
80
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
They then paid off the mortgage in 2008. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #312593,
Ashland County, 7/30/08]
Took Out Fourth Mortgage on This and Another Property for $235,000
In 2005, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $235,000. [Mortgage, Document #X299519, Ashland County, 10/21/05]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2007. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #309609,
Ashland County, 11/21/07]
NOTE: Though the mortgage indicates the parcel number of the Beaser Avenue property,
the legal description does not match. No evidence was found explaining why.
Took Out Fifth Mortgage on This and Another Property for $27,000
In 2006, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $27,000. [Mortgage, Document #303563, Ashland County, 8/17/06]
They were partially released from the mortgage in 2007. [Partial Release of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #309610, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
The Duffys were completely released from the mortgage in 2008. [Satisfaction of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #312594, Ashland County, 7/30/08]
NOTE: The mortgage identified the City Heights Road property as the Duffy’s home.
Took Out Sixth Mortgage on This and Another Property for $232,000
In 2007, the Duffys took out a mortgage on both their City Heights Road and Beaser
Avenue properties for $232,000. [Mortgage, Document #309611, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
The mortgage was transferred to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems that day.
[Assignment of Mortgage, Document #309612, Ashland County, 11/08/07]
2006-2007: Owned Property in Ashland
In 2006, Duffy and his wife bought a property in Ashland. [Parcel #201-04871-0000]
The Duffys bought the property from Thomas Fleig. [Warranty Deed, Document #305174, Ashland County,
12/22/06]
They then sold part of the property to Gerald Hennell two months later, and the remainder of the property
to William and Melinda Larson by July 2007. [Warranty Deed, Document #305497, Ashland County, 2/23/07;
Warranty Deed, Document #307750, Ashland County, 7/06/07]
Tax History
81
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s White River property:
Year
2007
TOTAL
Tax
$984.17
$984.17
Interest
$60.56
$60.56
Penalties
$30.28
$30.28
[Parcel #201-04871-0000, Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11]
Valued at $43,300
As of 2007, the total value of Duffy’s property was $43,300. [Ashland County Assessor, accessed
11/09/11]
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $45,000
The day they bought the property, the Duffys took out a mortgage for $45,000. [Mortgage, Document
#305175, Ashland County, 12/22/06]
They were partially released from the mortgage upon the sale of part of the property in 2007.
[Partial Release of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #305948, Ashland County, 2/23/07]
They were released from the entire mortgage upon sale of the remainder of the property later in
2007. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #307776, Ashland County, 7/09/07]
2006: Owned Lakefront Property in Bass Lake
In 2006, Duffy and his wife, along with his brother Patrick bought a property at 1434W Court Oreilles
Lake Drive in Bass Lake, WI. [Parcel #002-109-63-0302]
The group bought the property from Christine Ladewig, representing the deceased individual Mary
Touart. [Personal Representative’s Deed, Document #336890, Sawyer County, 2/03/06]
The group sold the property later that year to David and Karen Blissenbach. [Warranty Deed, Document
#341326, Sawyer County, 8/31/06]
Someone Else Paid Duffy’s Property Taxes
David Blissenbach, not Duffy, paid for the 2006 property taxes on this property. [Parcel #002-109-630302, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
NOTE: This is likely because Duffy bought and sold the property in the middle of the 2006 tax
year.
Valued at $252,700
As of 2006, the total value of Duffy’s property was $252,700. [Sawyer County Assessor, accessed
11/09/11]
82
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Took Out Mortgage for $229,500 on Property
Less than a week after buying the property, the Duffy family took out a mortgage on it for
$229,500. [Mortgage, Document #336903, Sawyer County, 2/09/06]
They then paid off the mortgage later that year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #341433,
Sawyer County, 9/05/06]
2005-2006: Owned Lakefront Property in Barnes
In 2005, Duffy and his wife, along with Patrick T. Duffy, bought a property at 49169 East Shore Road in
Barnes, WI. [Parcel #004-1118-01-990]
The group bought the property from Kenneth and Carol Voit. [Warranty Deed, Document #2005R-499084,
Bayfield County, 5/02/05]
They then sold the property to Michael and Amy Pink in 2006. [Warranty Deed, Document #2006R-504934,
Bayfield County, 6/31/06]
NOTE: Patrick T. Duffy is presumably Sean Duffy’s brother.
ALSO NOTE: The property was located near Middle Eau Claire Lake.
Tax History
The following outlines the tax history for Duffy’s property:
Year
2005
2006
TOTAL
Tax
$2,953.91
$2,728.33
$5,682.24
Interest
$29.54
$0
$29.54
Penalties*
$0
$0
$0
[Parcels #004-1118-01-990, Bayfield County Treasurer, accessed 9/21/11]
NOTE: Bayfield County does not charge penalties.
Valued at $304,900
As of 2006, the total value of the Duffy’s property was $304,900. [Bayfield County Assessor, accessed
11/09/11]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $270,000
83
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The week they bought the property, the Duffys and Patrick Duffy took out a mortgage on it
for $270,000. [Mortgage, Document #2005R-499085, Bayfield County, 5/05/05]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2006. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #2006R505111, Bayfield County, 2/13/06]
2004-2005: Owned Property in Eileen
In 2004, Duffy and his wife bought a vacant property at 29980 Carlson Road in Eileen, WI. [Parcels #0201025-09, #020-1026-01, #020-1026-02; Mortgage, Document #2004R-494783, Bayfield County, 9/30/04]
The Duffys bought the property from Elizabeth Zilke. [Warranty Deed, Document #2004R-494782, Bayfield
County, 9/30/04]
They split ownership of the property with Patrick Duffy in 2005. [Quit Claim Deed, Document #2005R-499061,
Bayfield County, 5/02/05]
The group then sold the property to Mark and Elizabeth Mackey in 2005. [Warranty Deed, Document #2005R499062, Bayfield County, 5/04/04]
[bing.com, accessed 9/01/11]
Someone Else Paid Duffy’s Property Taxes
Elizabeth Zilke, not Duffy, paid for the 2004 property taxes on this property. [Parcels #020-1025-09,
#020-1026-01, #020-1026-02, Bayfield County Treasurer, accessed 9/21/11]
84
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Valued at $42,470 Shortly After Duffy’s Sale
As of 2006, the total value of the property formerly owned by Duffy was $42,470. [Bayfield County
Assessor, accessed 11/09/11]
NOTE: 2005 assessment information was unavailable.
Called “Homestead Property”
According to the 2004 warranty deed for the property, it was considered a “homestead property.”
[Warranty Deed, Document #2004R-494782, Bayfield County, 9/30/04]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Eileen property:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $145,000
The day they bought the Eileen property, Duffy and his wife took out a mortgage on it for
$145,000. [Mortgage, Document #2004R-494783, Bayfield County, 9/30/04]
They then paid off the mortgage in 2005. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #2005R499122, Bayfield County, 5/12/05]
2003-2005: Owned Lakefront Property in Hayward
In 2003, Duffy along with Thomas J. Duffy, Patrick T. Duffy, and the Thomas W. Duffy Profit Sharing
Plan together bought a property at 12724 W. Peninsula Road in Hayward. [Parcel #010-171-00-4302]
The group bought the property from Carolyn Samuelson, representing the deceased individual Carl
Samuelson, and from Eugene Samuelson. [Personal Representative’s Deeds, Document #317017 and #317018, Sawyer
County, 10/31/03]
They then sold the property in 2005 to Max and Laurie Thompson. [Warranty Deed, Document #333717, Sawyer
County, 9/23/05]
NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
85
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[bing.com, accessed 11/09/11]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s property:
Year
2003
2004
TOTAL
Tax
$1,924.21
$2,073.62
$3,997.83
Interest
Penalties
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
[Parcel #010-171-00-4302, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
Took Out Mortgage for $188,010 on Property
The day the Duffy family bought the Round Lake property, they took out a mortgage on it for
$188,010. [Mortgage, Document #317019, Sawyer County, 10/31/03]
They paid off the mortgage the following year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #333739,
Sawyer County, 11/02/04]
2002-2005: Owned Property near Patricia Lake
In 2002, Duffy and Fred Scheer III bought a property in Minocqua, WI near Patricia Lake. [Parcel #MI2147-1A]
The two bought the property from Fred Scheer. [Quit Claim Deed, Document #547865, Oneida County, 2/05/02]
Duffy later sold his share of the property to Fred Scheer III in 2005. [Quit Claim Deed, Document #615717,
Oneida County, 4/07/05]
86
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: Although it is possible another Sean P. Duffy bought this property, it is likely our Sean Duffy
because the quit claim deed specifically indicates a lawyer Sean P. Duffy from Ashland who drafted the
deed.
ALSO NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s Patricia Lake property:
Year
2002
2003
2004
TOTAL
Tax
$633.89
$630.25
$659.89
$2,124.18
Interest
Penalties
$0
$34.66
$0
$34.66
$0
$17.33
$0
$17.33
[Parcel #MI-2147-1A, Oneida County Treasurer, accessed 9/20/11]
2000-2004: Owned Lakefront Properties in Bass Lake
In 2000, Duffy and his wife bought properties in Janesville Beach and Malar Beach, respectively. The
former was located at 14282 W. Poplar Lane in Bass Lake, WI. [Parcel #002-145-01-0100 and #002-157-01-0100]
The Duffys bought the properties from Norman, Margaret, and Geraldine Mitchell. [Warranty Deed,
Document #283140, Sawyer County, 3/31/00; Statutory Power of Attorney, Sawyer County, 3/30/00]
They later sold the properties in 2004 to Steve and Julie Pyle. [Warranty Deed, Document #326764, Sawyer
County, 11/16/04]
NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
87
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[bing.com, accessed 10/27/11]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s Bass Lake properties.
First property:
Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
TOTAL
Tax
$724.68
$764.96
$819.12
$842.64
$3,151.40
Interest
$39.22
$40.71
$0
$29.49
$109.42
Penalties
$9.80
$10.19
$0
$7.37
$27.36
[Parcel #002-145-01-0100, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
Second property:
Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
TOTAL
Tax
$306.48
$334.74
$358.45
$368.74
$1,368.41
Interest
$6.13
$3.35
$0
$12.90
$22.38
Penalties
$1.53
$.84
$0
$3.23
$5.60
[Parcel #002-157-01-0100, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
Mortgage History
88
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Bass Lake properties:
Took Out Mortgage for $35,000 on Properties
The day that the Duffys bought the Bass Lake properties, they took out a mortgage on
them for $35,000. [Mortgage, Document #283250, Sawyer County, 3/31/00]
The Duffys paid off the mortgage approximately two years later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #307392, Sawyer County, 1/16/03]
Mortgage Included Second Home Rider
On their mortgage for the Bass Lake properties, the Duffys included a second home
rider, which made explicit that the Duffys would use the Bass Lake properties as
their second home. [Mortgage, Document #288250, Sawyer County, 3/31/00]
Took Out Second Mortgage for $25,000 on Properties
Several months after the Duffys bought the Bass Lake properties, they took out a second
mortgage on them for $25,000. [Mortgage, Document #288168, Sawyer County, 12/05/00]
The Duffys paid off the mortgage approximately two years later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #307391, Sawyer County, 1/16/03]
Mortgage Included Second Home Rider
On their second mortgage for the Bass Lake properties, the Duffys included a
second home rider, which made explicit that the Duffys would use the Bass Lake
properties as their second home. [Mortgage, Document #288168, Sawyer County, 12/05/00]
Took Out Third Mortgage for $75,000 on Properties
In 2003, the Duffys took out a third mortgage on the Bass Lake properties for $75,000.
[Mortgage, Document #307614, Sawyer County, 1/13/03]
They paid off the mortgage later that year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document
#312712, Sawyer County, 6/25/03]
Took Out Fourth Mortgage for $105,000 on Properties
In 2003, the Duffys took out a fourth mortgage on the Bass Lake properties for $105,000.
[Mortgage, Document #312713, Sawyer County, 6/25/03]
They paid off the mortgage the following year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document
#327101, Sawyer County, 11/30/04]
2003: Owned Lakefront Property in Hayward
89
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2003, Duffy and Patrick T. Duffy bought a property at 7461 N. Stone Hill Road in Hayward, WI. [Parcel
#002-940-33-5312]
The two parties together bought the property from Evan Nielsen. [Warranty Deed, Document #310024, Sawyer
County, 3/29/03]
They then sold the property that year to Christopher and Ted Erickson. [Warranty Deed, Document #314855,
Sawyer County, 8/30/03]
NOTE: Patrick T. Duffy is presumably Sean Duffy’s brother.
ALSO NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
[bing.com, accessed 11/09/11]
Someone Else Paid Duffy’s Property Taxes
Leland Erickson, not Duffy, paid for the 2003 property taxes on this property. [Parcel #002-940-335312, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
NOTE: This is likely because Duffy bought and sold the property in the middle of the 2003 tax
year.
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Court Oreilles Lake property:
Took Out Mortgage for $28,601 on Property
Less than two weeks after buying the Court Oreilles Lake property, the Duffy brothers
took out a mortgage for $28,601. [Mortgage, Document #310025, Sawyer County, 4/07/03]
90
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The brothers paid off the mortgage later that year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #314955, Sawyer County, 9/03/03]
Took Out Second Mortgage for $85,000 on Property
Several months after buying the Court Oreilles Lake property, the Duffy brothers took out
a second mortgage for $85,000. [Mortgage, Document #312108, Sawyer County, 6/07/03]
The brothers paid off the mortgage later that year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #314954, Sawyer County, 9/03/03]
2001: Owned Property near Lake Hayward
In 2001, Duffy and the Hayward Family Dentistry bought a property near Lake Hayward. [Parcel #236-94127-1409]
The two parties together bought the property from Timothy and Carol Hillary. [Warranty Deed, Document
#291611, Sawyer County, 6/01/01]
They then sold the property to Knob Hill Homes, Inc. later that year. [Warranty Deed, Document #294169,
Sawyer County, 9/13/01]
NOTE: Hayward Family Dentistry is run by Patrick T. Duffy, who is likely Sean Duffy’s brother.
ALSO NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
Took Out Mortgage for $53,857 on Property
Less than two weeks after buying the Lake Hayward Property, Duffy and Hayward Family
Dentistry took out a mortgage on it for $53,857. [Mortgage, Document #291612, Sawyer County, 6/09/01]
The two parties paid off the mortgage later that year. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document
#294213, Sawyer County, 9/17/01]
1999-2001: Owned Home in Hayward
In 1999, Duffy and his wife bought a property at 15964 W. Fifth Street in Hayward, WI. [Mortgage,
Document #279659, Sawyer County, 9/17/99; Parcel #236-941-21-4411]
The Duffys bought the property from Brian and Holly Duffy. [Warranty Deed, Document #279493, Sawyer
County, 9/16/99]
The Duffys later sold the property in 2001 to Michael and Jennifer Hartling. [Warranty Deed, Document
#291671, Sawyer County, 6/08/01]
NOTE: Brian Duffy is presumably Sean Duffy’s brother.
ALSO NOTE: Assessment information regarding the value of this property was unavailable.
91
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[bing.com, accessed 10/27/11]
Tax History
The following outlines the property tax history for Duffy’s Hayward home:
Year
1999
2000
2001
TOTAL
Tax
$1,163.34
$1,164.12
$1,190.45
$3,517.91
Interest
$40.72
$0
$0
$40.72
Penalties
$10.18
$0
$0
$10.18
[Parcel #236-941-21-4411, Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
Mortgage History
The following outlines the mortgage history for Duffy’s Hayward home:
Took Out Mortgage on Property for $48,000
Shortly after buying the Hayward property, Duffy and his wife took out a mortgage on it
for $48,000. [Mortgage, Document #279494, Sawyer County, 9/17/99]
The Duffys paid off the mortgage nearly two years later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #291558, Sawyer County, 6/01/01]
Took Out Another Mortgage on Property for $12,000… Which They Paid Off That
Day
Shortly after buying the Hayward property, Duffy and his wife took out a second mortgage
on it for $12,000. [Mortgage, Document #279495, Sawyer County, 9/17/99]
92
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The same day the Duffys took out the mortgage, they paid it off. [Satisfaction of Real Estate
Mortgage, Document #279657, Sawyer County, 9/17/99]
NOTE: It is unclear why the Duffys chose to take out this mortgage in the first place.
Took Out Third Mortgage on Property for $12,000
Shortly after buying the Hayward property, Duffy and his wife took out a third mortgage
on it for $12,000 from People’s National Bank. [Mortgage, Document #279659, Sawyer County,
9/17/99]
The Duffys paid off the mortgage nearly two years later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #291557, Sawyer County, 6/01/01]
Took Out Fourth Mortgage on Property for $5,000 from Thomas Duffy’s Profit
Sharing Plan
Shortly after buying the Hayward property, the Duffys took out a third mortgage on it for
$5,000.
The property was mortgaged to the “Thomas W. Duffy Profit Sharing Plan” [Mortgage,
Document #279496, Sawyer County, 9/17/99]
The Duffys paid off the mortgage nearly two years later. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage,
Document #291559, Sawyer County, 6/11/01]
NOTE: Thomas W. Duffy is likely Sean Duffy’s father.
Thomas Duffy Agreed to be Subordinate to Another Lender
Upon the Duffy’s taking out a mortgage from the Thomas W. Duffy Profit Sharing Plan,
Thomas Duffy agreed to be subordinate to another lender to the Duffys, People’s National
Bank. [Real Estate Mortgage Subordination Agreement, Document #279730, Sawyer County, 9/17/99]
That subordination agreement was ended after the Duffys paid off their mortgage to
People’s National Bank. [Satisfaction of Real Estate Mortgage, Document #291813, Sawyer County,
6/01/01]
93
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Political Career
Significant Findings
 Geared up to run for Congress in 2004
 Unsuccessfully applied to become US Attorney in 2005
 Longtime Wisconsin political operative
 Palin helped raise over $25,000 for Duffy’s campaign
 Praised Tea Party movement
 Member of Republican Study Committee and endorsed by House Conservatives
Fund
Duffy has long aspired to higher office. He geared up to run for Congress in 2004
before dropping out, and unsuccessfully applied to become US Attorney in 2005.
Duffy spent years working with the Wisconsin GOP at both the local and
presidential levels. While running for Congress in 2010, Duffy praised the Tea Party
movement and was assisted by Sarah Palin, who helped raise over $25,000 for his
campaign. Duffy is currently a member of the Republican Study Committee, and
was endorsed by the House Conservatives Fund.
Political Career
The following outlines Duffy’s political career:
NOTE: Though the Sawyer County Record reported that Sean Duffy ran for Hayward City Council in
2000, the Hayward City Clerk stated the newspaper was in error, and that Duffy’s brother Brian ran
instead.
2011-Present: Member of Congress
Since 2011, Duffy has served as a member of Congress from Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional
District. [Various]
2010: Ran for Congress Even Though His Family “Will Suffer”
In 2010, Duffy said that he was running for Congress thought “my family will suffer.”
94
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“I am a father of six; the oldest is 10, and the newborn is 2 months old. This is not a good time for
me to run for Congress. I am in this because we need people to come in and fight for the next
generation. I am going to engage in that fight. My family will suffer because their dad isn’t home
many nights. But I think that, in the end, they are better off because I am in this race. I have good
old-fashioned Wisconsin common sense,” he said. [National Journal, 6/11/10]
2005: Applied to Become US Attorney
In 2005, Duffy applied to become a US Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin. [Capital
Times, 5/26/05]
NOTE: Duffy was not selected as US Attorney.
2004: Geared Up To Run for Congress
In 2003, Duffy considered running for Congress. [Associated Press, 6/22/03]
But in 2004, Duffy said that he was “moving ahead with a campaign” until he found out in the
summer of 2003 that his wife was pregnant with a third child.
“I also have a lot of big cases coming up and just decided not to run right now,” he said. [Wausau
Daily Herald, 2/02/04]
Announced Candidacy at Wausau Homes
In 2009, Duffy announced his candidacy for Congress at Wausau Homes. [The Daily Telegram, 7/09/09]
Owned By Major Contributors to Governor Walker and Americans for Prosperity
According to 2011 analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wausau Homes’ co-owners and
co-founder’s wife donated $25,000 to Governor Walker’s campaign fund. Moreover, the trio “had
been active with Americans for Propserity, which helped organize tea party events.” [Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel, 4/08/11]
President Organized Tea Party Event in Downtown Wausau
In 2010, Wausau Homes president Tom Schuette organized a tea party event in downtown
Wausau.
“Right now, extreme members are trying to force through something the American public does not
want,” Schuette explained. “We need to start over and begin with incremental reforms that a
majority agrees with.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 3/16/10]
Longtime Wisconsin Political Operative
The following outlines Duffy’s work with the Wisconsin Republican Party:
95
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2011: Planned Fundraiser with Governor Walker as Walker Fought Collective Bargaining
Rights for Public Sector Workers
In 2011, Duffy held a fundraiser with Governor Scott Walker while Walker fought collective
bargaining rights for public sector workers. [The Hill, 3/12/11]
… And Former Chief of Staff Led Campaign to Protect Governor Walker
After serving as Duffy’s chief of staff, Matt Seaholm left to served as Wisconsin director
of Americans for Prosperity, where he led a campaign to support Governor Scott Walker’s
initiatives. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 3/08/11]
2010: Close to Paul Ryan’s Staff
In 2010, Duffy said he often consulted Congressman Paul Ryan and his staff, seeing Ryan’s
politics as a model for winning over Democrats and Independents. [Associated Press, 7/04/10]
2010: Endorsed by 7th Congressional District GOP
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by the 7th Congressional District Republican Party, receiving 84
percent of delegates’ votes. [Spooner Advocate, 3/12/10]
2010: Attacked for Ties to State Director for Americans for Prosperity
In 2010, the Wisconsin Democratic Party attacked Duffy for his ties to Mark Block, state director
of Americans for Prosperity, and called Block a “criminal fundraiser”.
Block had previously settled a lawsuit filed by the Wisconsin Elections Board by agreeing to pay
$15,000 in 2001, and also signed a statement saying the Board “may be able to prove” election
violations at trial.
At issue was Block’s management of a campaign that was accused of coordinating an undisclosed
campaign effort worth around $200,000 with an outside group. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/14/10]
2008: Served as Northwest Wisconsin Team Leader for McCain Campaign
In 2008, Duffy served as northwest Wisconsin’s team leader for the McCain campaign.
He said his team was working with veterans, business leaders, farmers and Catholics “who have
issues that fit directly with the John McCain message. And people from those coalitions are
coming in and wanting to also participate in that local level and help us out.” [Capital Times, 8/13/08]
2008: Served as District Seven Chairman of Wisconsin GOP
In 2008, Duffy served as the District Seven Chairman of the Wisconsin GOP. [Stevens Point Journal,
2/29/08]
96
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Where He Endorsed Dan Mielke during 2008 Campaign
In 2008, Dan Mielke was endorsed by the 7th Congressional District Republican Party,
while Duffy served as chair of the group.
Duffy said the group’s endorsement appeared to be the first and only time in its history that
it endorsed a congressional candidate. [Daily Telegram, 8/27/08]
2004: Served as Wisconsin Elector for Republican Party
In 2004, Duffy served as the GOP’s elector from Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District. [Wisconsin
State Journal, 10/30/04]
… While Wife Served as Alternate Delegate to RNC
In 2004, Duffy’s wife served as an alternate delegate from the Wisconsin delegation to the
Republican National Convention. [Associated Press, 8/31/04]
Endorsed by Conservative Groups
The following outlines Duffy’s group endorsements:
Endorsed by House Conservatives Fund
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by the House Conservatives Fund. [Roll Call, 3/10/10]
Prominently Featured on HCF Website
During his 2010 campaign, Duffy was prominently featured on the House Conservatives
Fund’s website:
[houseconservatives.com, accessed 8/16/11]
97
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Endorsed by Wisconsin Right to Life
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by Wisconsin Right to Life. [Associated Press, 5/27/10]
60+ Association Allegedly Sent Mailers Thanking Sean Duffy
In 2011, an individual from Gordon, Wisconsin allegedly received a mailer from the 60+
Association showing happy senior citizens smiling and saying, “Thank You Congressman Sean
Duffy … for voting to Improve and Protect Medicare.” [John Rusch LTE, Superior Telegram, 5/27/11]
Helped by Several Republican Presidential Candidates
The following outlines Duffy’s ties to Republican presidential candidates:
Endorsed by Sarah Palin
In February2010, Duffy was endorsed by Sarah Palin.
“In this election year, we’ll see many daring Davids take on entrenched Goliaths. Just one of these
many brave souls is a northern Wisconsin patriot named Sean Duffy. He’s running in Wisconsin’s
7th congressional district against a liberal Goliath who’s been in Congress over 40 years now and
has the dubious distinction of being the author of the stimulus bill. To commemorate the
anniversary of the signing of the stimulus, Sean Duffy is holding a fundraising “money bomb” for
his campaign so he can replace the career politician who drafted this government-bloating
behemoth,” Palin wrote. [facebook.com, 2/17/10]
… Who Helped Him Raise Over $25,000
On her 2010 Facebook page, Palin urged her supporters to donate to Duffy’s $25,000
fundraiser “money bomb.”
“To commemorate the anniversary of the signing of the stimulus, Sean Duffy is holding a
fundraising “money bomb” for his campaign so he can replace the career politician who
drafted this government-bloating behemoth,” she wrote. [facebook.com, 2/17/10]
Duffy eventually raised $27,128 by the following day. [Los Angeles Times, 2/18/10]
Duffy: “I’m Completely Grateful For What She’s Done”
Commenting on Palin’s 2010 endorsement of his campaign, Duffy said, “I’m completely
grateful for what she’s done.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 2/18/10]
Poster Promoting Sarah Palin Hung Outside Campaign Office’s Opening
98
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
At Duffy’s May 2010 opening of a campaign office in Wausau, a poster promoting Sarah
Palin and her new book “Going Rogue” greeted supporters. [Marshfield News, 5/14/10]
Endorsed by Tim Pawlenty
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty. [washingtonpost.com,
3/31/10]
… And Later Introduced Pawlenty at CPAC Conference
In 2011, Duffy introduced former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty at the CPAC
conference. [politico.com, 2/11/11]
Raised Money with Help From Newt Gingrich
In 2010, Duffy raised money with help from Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 7/17/10]
Endorsed by Rudy Giuliani
In 2010, Duffy allowed former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani to come and campaign for
him. [politico.com, 10/31/10]
Praised Tea Party Movement
In 2010, Duffy praised the Tea Party movement.
“I’m committed to the conservative message of personal and fiscal responsiblity, liberty, the founding
principals. I believe that the Constitution is under attack and the role of governement is being expanded.
The tea party movement has done a good job of exposing this - whether the MSM gets it or not!” he said.
[Duffy RedState interview, 1/13/10]
Spoke About Obama’s “Associations with Anti-American Radicals”
In 2008, Duffy warmed up a crowd waiting for Presidential candidate John McCain by speaking
about Obama’s “associations with anti-American radicals.” [Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 10/10/08]
Letter to the Editor: Duffy Spoke of His Admiration for Glenn Beck
According to a 2009 letter to the editor, Duffy riled up the crowd at a Tea Party event by speaking
of his admiration of Fox News personality Glenn Beck. [Susan Hansen LTE, Superior Telegram, 9/23/09]
Criticized State Legislator for Flip-Flopping on Ban on Concealed Weapons
In 2004, Duffy criticized state representative Gary Sherman for flip-flopping on a ban on concealed
weapons.
99
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“It’s a perfect example of why people have become so disillusioned with politics and with politicians,”
Duffy said. [Wisconsin State Journal, 2/06/04]
Received Failing Grade from Heritage Action Vote Study
In 2011, Duffy received a failing grade – 53 percent – from the Heritage Action for several votes that he
took in Congress. [Heritage Action Scorecard, accessed 8/31/11]
Member of Republican Study Committee
As of 2011, Duffy was a member of the Republican Study Committee. [RSC Membership; accessed 11/09/11]
… Though He Voted Against 2011 RSC Budget Alternative
In 2011, Duffy voted against an amendment to the 2011 budget resolution that would replace it
with the Republican Study Committee’s “Honest Solutions” budget resolution. [RSC press release,
4/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 119-136. [H Con Res 34, Vote #275, 4/15/11]
Was On NRCC’s Young Guns List
In 2010, Duffy joined the NRCC’s Young Guns list. [nrcc.org, 5/06/10]
Used Strikingly Similar Language Compared To Other Republicans
According to a 2010 analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Duffy’s website used “strikingly similar
passages” to other Republican candidates.
“Presenting the ideas as their own, the candidates have posted strikingly similar passages detailing their
stances on such issues as the economy, taxes and jobs, a review of their sites found. The similarity raises
the question of whether some of the candidates are plagiarizing each other or whether they are all taking
their language from a common source,” the newspaper reported. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 5/24/10]
… But Claimed the Wording Was His Own
According to Duffy campaign manager Matt Seaholm, the language on the campaign’s website
was completely original.
“We certainly did not copy and paste from anybody’s Web site,” he said. “We can come up with
our own phrasing.”
Attacked on Julie Lassa
The following outlines Duffy’s attacks on Democratic opponent Julie Lassa:
Attacked Opponent for Being “Madison Insider”
100
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy attacked his Democratic opponent Julie Lassa for being a “Madison insider.”
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 9/21/10]
Attacked Opponent for Accepting Pay Raise
In 2010, Duffy attacked his Democratic opponent Julie Lassa for accepting a $2,530 pay raise.
“Lassa willingly took a hefty pay raise at a time when people throughout her district and the state
were losing their jobs,” Duffy campaign manager Matt Seaholm said. [politifact.com, 8/25/10]
Claimed Rated “Half-True” by Fact Checking Group
In 2010, fact checking group PolitiFact Wisconsin rated Duffy’s pay raise claim “halftrue” because Lassa was in the process of returning approximately half of her pay raise.
[politifact.com, 8/25/10]
Attacked Opponent for Being “Nowhere To Be Seen”
In 2010, Duffy attacked his Democratic opponent Julie Lassa for being “nowhere to be seen” on
the campaign trail.
“She can’t hide forever,” he said. “It will be interesting to see: Will they try to keep her away from
the public, to not talk about the problems we face, or will they let her out and speak her mind?”
[Wisconsin State Journal, 7/06/10]
Attacked on David Obey
The following outlines Duffy’s attacks on Democratic opponent David Obey:
Accused Congressman Obey of Being Arrogant
In 2010, Duffy accused Congressman David Obey of being arrogant.
“I think he is arrogant,” he said. “I think he is smart, but he is arrogant.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
3/05/10]
Accused Congressman Obey of Buying Votes
In 2010, Duffy accused Congressman David Obey of “buying votes.” [Record Review, 2/17/10]
NRCC Attacked Obey for Washington’s Spending Spree
In 2010, the NRCC aired television ads attacking Congressman David Obey for being responsible
for Washington’s spending spree. [Capital Times, 4/21/10]
Said Obey Served His District Honorably
101
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy said that Obey had served his district honorably.
“He has, I think, served the District honorably,” he said. “Even though we’ve disagreed on
positions, I think he’s been an honorable representative for northern Wisconsin.” [Daily Press,
5/05/10]
Republicans Aimed to Shore Up Duffy’s Congressional Seat
According to redistricting maps released by Wisconsin Republicans, their chief aim would be to protect
Duffy’s Congressional seat. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 7/10/11]
… And Duffy Defended Map As Making “Modest Changes”
In a statement on the Republican redistricting maps, Duffy stated that they made “modest
changes” to reflect population shifts.
“The map makes modest changes to reflect statewide population shifts, but unlike what the
Democrats are proposing in Illinois, doesn’t make drastic partisan gerrymandering the goal,” he
said. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 7/10/11]
Lines Were Significantly More Irregular Than Current Lines
According to analysis by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the resulting lines of the Republican
redistricting maps were significantly more irregular than current lines. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
7/10/11]
Fellow Congressman Paul Ryan Led Draft of Map
According to the Journal Sentinel, Congressman Paul Ryan led the drafting of the map. [Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel, 6/19/11]
Staff
The following outlines Duffy’s staff:
Campaign Manager, then Chief of Staff: Matt Seaholm
In 2010, Duffy’s campaign manager was Matt Seaholm. [Stevens Point Journal, 7/14/10]
After Duffy’s election, Seaholm became his chief of staff. [Wausau Daily Herald, 12/16/10]
Seaholm Left to Run AFP Wisconsin
Shortly after becoming Duffy’s chief of staff, Seaholm left to run Americans for
Prosperity’s Wisconsin office. [Herald Times Reporter, 2/24/11]
102
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Communications Director: Daniel Son
In 2011, Duffy’s communications director was Daniel Son. [Stevens Point Journal, 6/14/11]
District Director: Dave Anderson
In 2010, Duffy’s district director was Dave Anderson. [Wausau Daily Herald, 12/16/10]
Leased “Mobile Office” for $1,350 Per Month
In 2011, Duffy announced his office would use a “mobile office” to carry staff members around his
Congressional District.
The office would cost $1,350 per month, and be the size of a small airport shuttle.
“So if you’re not the biggest community, and you never have a congressional office in your hometown,
now you do,” Duffy explained. [Marshfield News, 7/06/11]
Criticized for Not Using Public Buildings Instead
Duffy’s mobile office was criticized by local Democrats, who asked why Duffy could not use
public buildings instead of the bus. [Marshfield News, 7/06/11]
Campaign Announcement Sabotaged by Fake Email
In 2009, Duffy’s campaign claimed its announcement was sabotaged by a fake email stating the time and
location for the announcement had changed. [Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 7/08/09]
Attended Press Club Dinner
In 2011, Duffy spoke at the Washington Press Club Foundation’s annual Congressional dinner.
However, most of the jokes he told fell flat. [Washington Post, 2/11/11]
Talked About Putting “Tanning Lotion on Speaker Boehner’s Back”
During his speech at the Congressional dinner, Duffy talked about putting “tanning lotion on
Speaker Boehner’s back.”
“[Sarah] Palin and I both have shapely legs. It’s just that Palin puts lipstick on a pig, while I put
tanning lotion on Speaker [John] Boehner’s [R-Ohio] back,” he said. [The Washington Scene, The Hill]
Attended Congressman McCarthy’s Lincoln Day Dinner
In 2011, Duffy attended Congressman Kevin McCarthy’s Lincoln Day Dinner. [politico.com, 2/17/11;
flickr.com, 2/25/11]
103
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Out of Touch
Significant Findings
 Enjoyed well-paying government jobs… with salaries over twice the region’s
median income
 Paid property taxes late 12 times
 Owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to home
 Flew in sushi for annual Christmas party
 Took over $12,000 in taxpayer-funded commercial trips in first seven months
of office
Since 2002, Duffy has enjoyed well-paying government jobs with salaries over
twice his home region’s median income. Meanwhile, Duffy has paid his property
taxes late 12 times. He owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to his
home, and flew in sushi for his family’s annual Christmas party. Since becoming a
Congressman, Duffy has taken over $12,000 in taxpayer-funded commercial trips.
Enjoyed Well-Paying Government Jobs
The following outlines Duffy’s well-paying jobs:
Earned Over $80,000 A Year as County DA
As District Attorney for Ashland County, Duffy regularly earned over $80,000 a year:
Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Salary*
$42,912.80
$81,964.88
$82,103.84
$83,072.08
$83,131.36
$88,258.72
$91,979.28
$93,122.64
$48,446.64
[Wisconsin Department of Administration,
104
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
accessed 9/23/11]
*NOTE: Excluded fringe benefits.
… While Ashland County’s Median Income Was Nearly $60,000 Less
As of 2009, the median household income for Ashland County was $37,555. [US Census
Bureau, last revised 10/13/11]
Duffy Was Also Paid $40 Per Hour As Special Prosecutor
Between 2000 and 2002, Duffy was regularly paid $40 per hour to work as a special
prosecutor for Ashland County. [Wisconsin Department of Administration, accessed 9/23/11]
NOTE: At the beginning of his hiring as special prosecutor, Duffy’s hourly rate swung
between $50 and $25.
Earned $174,000 Annually as Congressman
In 2011, Duffy made $174,000 annually as a Congressman. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
… An 86 Percent Salary Increase From Duffy’s Previous Job
Duffy’s annual salary increased from $93,122.64 in 2009 to $174,000 to 2011, an 86
percent increase.
Paid Property Taxes Late 12 Times
As of 2011, Duffy has paid his property taxes late 12 times:
County
Ashland
Bayfield
Oneida
Sawyer
Year
2007
2005
2005
2005
2003
2003
2003
2001
2001
2000
2000
1999
Property
201-04871-0000
201-4834-0000
201-0401-0000
004-1118-01-990
MI-2147-1A
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
002-157-01-0100
002-145-01-0100
236-941-21-4411
TOTAL
Tax
$984.17
$4,732.09
$1,914.13
$2,953.91
$630.25
$368.74
$842.64
$334.74
$764.96
$306.48
$724.68
$1,163.34
$15,720.13
Interest
$60.56
$236.20
$95.71
$29.54
$34.66
$12.90
$29.49
$3.35
$40.71
$6.13
$39.22
$40.72
$629.19
Penalty
$30.28
$118.10
$47.85
*$0
$17.33
$3.23
$7.37
$0.84
$10.19
$1.53
$9.80
$10.18
$256.70
[Ashland County Treasurer, accessed 9/19/11;
Bayfield County Treasurer, accessed 9/21/11;
Oneida County Treasurer, accessed 9/20/11;
105
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Sawyer County Treasurer, accessed 9/22/11]
NOTE: Bayfield County does not charge a penalty for late taxes.
Owned Seven Different Lakefront Properties in Addition to Home
Since 2003, Duffy has owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to his home:
Year
2008-2011
2006
2005-2006
2003-2005
2002-2005
2000-2004
2003
Location
Iron River
Bass Lake
Barnes
Hayward
Minocqua
Bass Lake
Hayward
[Parcel #024-1124-03-000, Ashland County;
Parcel #002-109-63-0302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #004-1118-01-990, Bayfield County;
Parcel #010-171-00-4302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #MI-2147-1A, Oneida County;
Parcel #002-145-01-0100 and #002-157-01-0100, Sawyer County;
Parcel #002-940-33-5312, Sawyer County]
NOTE: Duffy potentially also owned lakefront property in White River between 2006 and 2008. However,
the address of the property was unavailable.
Flew In Sushi For Annual Christmas Sushi Party
On a 2007 video for ParentDish, Rachel Duffy described how her family flew in sushi for their annual
Christmas sushi party:
“Every year my family throws a sushi party at Christmas. I know that sounds kind of nontraditional, but you’d be surprised at how much people enjoy the party. I fly the sushi from
somewhere else. I live in Wisconsin, so I can’t get it any other way. But it’s really easy, I
get on the internet, I order it—flies in the next day. I cook up a pot of me so smooth, I
steam some edamame and I make some white rice. Everybody comes over and they love to
get involved in making the sushi.” [Rachel Campos-Duffy on ParentDish, De-Stressing the Holidays]
… And Duffy Bought Sushi-Grade Fish to Make Sushi for His Wife
In 2009, Rachel Duffy described how Sean Duffy would buy “sushi-grade fish to make homemade
sushi for me.”
“We both love sushi, but I think what I love most is that since he enjoys rolling sushi, I don’t have
to do anything!” she wrote. [P. 223, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Took Taxpayer-Funded Commercial Trips Totaling Over $12,000 in First Seven Months of Office
106
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to his office’s disbursement reports, Duffy has taken many taxpayer-funded commercial trips,
worth $12,285.40, on commercial transportation:
Date
1/11/11
1/15/11
1/20/11
1/23/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/13/11
2/19/11
2/28/11
3/03/11
3/08/11
3/14/11
3/17/11
4/01/11
4/04/11
4/09/11
4/12/11
4/15/11
4/09/11
4/25/11
5/10/11
5/13/11
5/23/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/13/11
6/16/11
6/21/11
6/24/11
7/08/11
7/11/11
Description
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
TOTAL
Amount
$304.70
$304.70
$609.40
$521.40
$304.70
$305.40
$25.00
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$413.40
$571.40
$521.40
$304.70
$25.00
$304.70
$571.40
$502.40
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$803.70
$803.70
-$803.70
$521.40
$521.40
-$521.40
$304.70
$571.40
$304.70
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$12,285.40
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
107
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
*NOTE: It appears that Duffy was mistakenly reimbursed twice for the same flight, and that he repaid the
reimbursement.
… Then Travel Expenses Were Charged to Duffy’s Official Citibank Government Card
Beginning July 2011, travel expenses were charged to Duffy’s official Citibank Government Card:
Start Date
7/05/11
7/28/11
8/01/11
End Date
7/24/11
8/26/11
8/23/11
Description
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
TOTAL
Amount
$2,773.22
$575.51
$2,444.78
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
NOTE: The charges to the office’s Citibank Government Card do not indicate they are specifically
for Duffy’s travel expenses. However, given that Duffy’s being reimbursed for commercial
transportation stops abruptly, and charges to the Citibank Government Card then start appearing,
it is likely that Duffy is charging his travel expenses to his office’s Citibank Government Card.
Said He Would Travel Between Wisconsin and DC Each Week
In 2011, Duffy said he would travel between Wisconsin and DC each week.
“I will not be a congressman who lives in Washington, D.C.,” he said. “I love Wisconsin; I will
only live in Wisconsin. So I will travel back and forth every week.” [County Journal, 1/19/11]
Complained His New Federal Benefits Were Not As Good As State Benefits
According to PolitiFact Wisconsin, Duffy received new government-provided pension and health benefits
while serving in Congress. However, he complained that his new federal benefits were not as good as his
state benefits.
“The benefits that were offered to me as a congressman don’t even compare to the benefits that you get as
a state employee,” Duffy said. “I just experienced that myself. They’re not nearly as good.” [politifact.com,
2/23/11]
Allowed Repealing Health Care While Keeping Benefits for Members of Congress
In January 2011, Duffy voted against a motion that would not allow Congress to repeal the health
reform bill without a majority of members of the House and Senate agreeing to forgo federal
benefits themselves.
The motion to recommit instructed the repeal bill to be sent back to three committees and altered
to require a majority of House and Senate members to give up federal health care benefits before
repeal could take place.
108
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“Congress should live by the same rule it imposes on everyone else,” said Rep. Robert Andrews.
“There are serious consequences of this bill and we believe that repealing it is unfair and just plain
wrong. It would even be more wrong for those who support the repeal to live by a different
standard.” [The Hill, 1/19/11]
The bill failed, 185-245. [H.R. 2, Vote #13, 1/19/11]
Voted to Keep Federal Health Care Benefits a Secret
In January 2011, Duffy voted against requiring the disclosure of whether Members were enrolling
in the Federal Employees Health Benefits program.
The bill failed, 238-191. [H Res 5, Vote #5, 1/05/11]
Owned Pleasure Boat Since 2001
Since 2001, Duffy has owned a pleasure boat.
One he owned from 2001 to 2007, and another he owned from 2007 to present:
2007-Present: Owned 18 Foot Pleasure Boat
Since 2007, Duffy has been the registered owner of an 18 foot pleasure boat.
According to the state Department of Natural Resources, Duffy’s boat was a 1996 Bayliner
1850SS Capri. [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
Explicitly Indicated Boat Would Be Used for Pleasure
According to Duffy’s registration, the boat would be used for pleasure:
[Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
109
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
2001-2007: Owned Pleasure 16 Foot Boat
Between 2001 and 2007, Duffy held the registration for a 16 foot pleasure boat, which he also
indicated he would use for pleasure:
[Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, accessed 8/22/11]
Family Decided They Liked That “Daddy Makes Money”
On a list of “Things We Like” that the Duffy family compiled in 2009, they listed “Daddy makes money.”
[P. 78, Stay Home, Stay Happy]
Enjoyed “Family Spa Night” with “Essential Oil” Massages
In 2009, Rachel Duffy described how her family enjoyed “family spa night,” which included using
“essential oil” for massages for their children:
“There are plenty of easy things you can do even on a weeknight. If my husband and I
know we have an extra half hour after bath time, we announce that it’s family spa night,
and the kids squeal with joy! After their baths, they come in their bathrobes to our bed and
select an essential oil for their foot and hand massages. After Sean and I give massages if
there’s time, we also paint the girls’ nails. It’s simple, fun, and cheap.” [P. 82, Stay Home, Stay
Happy]
Often Complained About Family’s Struggling Finances
Duffy and his wife often talked about their family’s struggling finances:
2011: “I Have More Debt Than All Of You”
During a 2011 town hall meeting, Duffy told a constituent, “I have more debt than all of you.”
110
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“With six kids, I still pay off my student loans. I still pay my mortgage. I drive a used minivan,”
Duffy said. “If you think I’m living high on the hog, I’ve got one paycheck. So I struggle to meet
my bills right now,” Duffy said. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
… And “I Struggle To Meet My Bills Right Now”
During a 2011 town hall meeting, Duffy told a constituent, “I struggle to meet my bills
right now.”
“With six kids, I still pay off my student loans. I still pay my mortgage. I drive a used
minivan,” Duffy said. “If you think I’m living high on the hog, I’ve got one paycheck. So I
struggle to meet my bills right now,” Duffy said. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
Later Admitted His Words Were “Poorly Chosen”
Shortly after he made his statement, Duffy admitted his words were “poorly chosen.”
[Central Wisconsin Sunday, 4/03/11]
2011: Complained that Federal Benefits Did Not Compare to State Benefits
In 2011, Duffy complained that federal benefits did not compare to Wisconsin’s state benefits.
“The benefits that were offered to me as a congressman don’t even compare to the benefits that
you get as a state employee. I just experienced that myself. They’re not nearly as good,” he said.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 3/29/11]
Fact Check Group Rated Duffy’s Complaint “Half-True”
In 2011, fact check group PolitiFact Wisconsin rated Duffy’s complaint “half-true”.
“Duffy apparently selected one of the higher-priced health plans, but won’t say which one,
so we can’t do an exact comparison. But looking at the plans offered, we found potentially
much higher health insurance costs for federal workers, depending on which plan and what
level of coverage an employee wants. But we found a far less significant gap -- and some
federal advantages -- on retirement benefits,” it explained. [politifact.com, 2/23/11]
2011: Slept in His Office, Citing Cost of Second Home
In 2011, Duffy slept in his Congressional office, citing the cost of a second home. [cbsnews.com,
1/22/11]
2010: Said His Family Lived On A Budget
In a 2010 op-ed, Duffy wrote that his family lived on a budget.
111
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“My family, like many families in northern and central Wisconsin, lives on a budget, and I believe
the government should, too,” he wrote. [Duffy op-ed, Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 9/24/10]
2010: Claimed Insurance Did Not Cover His First Son’s Birth
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy claimed that insurance did not cover the expenses regarding
his first son’s birth. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
2008: Wife Cited Low Cost-of-Living As “Important Factor” For Deciding Where to Live
In a 2008 interview with People Magazine, Duffy’s wife Rachel cited low cost of living as an
“important factor” for deciding where to live.
“Also, it’s possible to have a one-income household because the cost of living is lower. That was
an important factor for both of us in deciding where to live and raise our family,” she said.
[people.com, 4/01/08]
112
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Ineffective for Wisconsin
Significant Findings
 Unemployment increased since Duffy took office
 State ranked one of worst in nation for foreclosure rates
 Violent crime nearly quadrupled with Duffy as DA
 Aggravated assaults increased over 140 percent with Duffy as DA
 Ashland County had record-high rate of sexual assaults with Duffy as DA
Duffy’s record, past and present, raise questions whether he has been effective for
Wisconsin. Under Duffy’s tenure as Ashland County DA, violent crime in the
county nearly quadrupled, aggravated assaults increased over 140, and the county
had the highest rate of sexual assaults in the state the same year Duffy announced
his run for Congress.
Though Duffy campaigned on a promise to create jobs, since assuming office
Wisconsin’s unemployment rate increased, from 7.4 to 7.7 percent, with over 8,000
more people without work. Meanwhile, Wisconsin has been ranked one of the
worst in the nation for foreclosure rates.
Over 8,000 More People Became Unemployed Since Duffy Took Office
Since Duffy took office in January 2011, 8,103 more people have become unemployed.
Date
January 2011
October 2011
DIFFERENCE
Unemployment
225,983
234,086
8,103
Percent
7.4%
7.7%
[bls.gov, accessed 11/15/11]
… Even Though Duffy Promised to Create Jobs
In his first 2010 television ad, Duffy promised to create jobs.
“Washington politicians - they’ve failed us. They told us they were going to create jobs and
stimulate the economy,” Duffy said in the advertisement. “[If] you send me to Washington, I’m
113
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
going to work to keep our businesses open and create jobs right here in the great state of
Wisconsin.” [Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 5/12/10]
Wisconsin Ranked One of Worst in Nation for Foreclosure Rates
In November 2011, according to analysis by RealtyTrac, Wisconsin was ranked 15th in the nation for
foreclosure rates in October 2011.
One out of every 643 households in Wisconsin received a foreclosure notice during the month. [Associated
Press, 11/10/11]
Violent Crime Rate Nearly Quadrupled Under Duffy
While Duffy served as Ashland County DA, the violent crime rate per 100,000 Wisconsin residents in
Ashland County nearly quadrupled:
YEAR
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
VIOLENT CRIME RATE
Ashland
WI
88
223
136
217
218
211
331
244
379
289
213
288
203
276
344
259
197
250
[Wisconsin Office of Justice Statistics, accessed 10/27/11]
NOTE: The crime rate dropped in 2010 to just over double its rate in 2002.
Aggravated Assaults Increased Over 140 Percent Under Duffy
The following table outlines the changes in crime rates per 100,000 residents in Ashland County while
Duffy served as its district attorney:
Offense
Murder
Forcible Rape
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Theft
Motor Vehicle Theft
Arson
2002 Rate
0
11.8
0
76.6
524.2
2,249.8
159.0
11.8
2010 Rate
0
12.3
0
185.0
413.0
2,177.0
80.0
6.0
% Change
0
4.2
0
141.5
-21.2
-3.2
-49.7
-49.2
[Wisconsin Crime in 2002 and 2010]
114
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: This table should be used with caution. Data from one month in 2002 with Ashland County Sheriff
was unavailable. As the Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance noted, “offense rates based on less than 12
months of data would be misleading.”
… And Once Had Third-Highest Rate of Aggravated Assault in Wisconsin
In 2009, Ashland County had the third-highest rate of aggravated assault in Wisconsin, after
Menominee and Milwaukee Counties. [Wisconsin Crime in 2009]
Ashland County Had Higher-Than-Average Rates of Aggravated Assault When Duffy Left
Office
The following table compares the crime rates per 100,000 residents in Ashland County, in Duffy’s
final year as its district attorney, to those rates for the state as a whole:
Offense
Murder
Forcible Rape
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Theft
Motor Vehicle Theft
Arson
Ashland Rate
0
12.3
0
185.0
413.0
2,177.0
80.0
6.0
State Rate
2.8
21.0
80.0
146.0
475.0
1,892.0
143.0
12.0
Difference
-2.8
-8.7
-80
39
-62
285
-63
-6
[Wisconsin Crime in 2010]
Had Highest Rate of Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin in 2009
In 2009, Ashland County had the highest rate of sexual assaults per 100,000 residents of any county in
Wisconsin:
Rank
1
2
3
4
4
County
Ashland
Vilas
Lincoln
Kewaunee
Fond du Lac
Rate
167
163
146
143
143
[Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin, 2009]
… More Than Twice Statewide Rate
In 2009, Wisconsin’s rate of sexual assaults was 82 per 100,000 residents, while Ashland
County’s was 167 per 100,000 residents – more than twice as much. [Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin,
2009]
115
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Had Third Highest Rate in 2008… and Nearly Twice State Rate
In 2008, Ashland County had the third highest rate of sexual assaults per 100,000 residents in
Wisconsin.
Though Wisconsin had a rate of 83 sexual assaults per 100,000 residents, Ashland County had 160
sexual assaults per 100,000 – nearly twice the state’s rate. [Sexual Assaults in Wisconsin, 2008]
116
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Just Another Politician
Significant Findings
 Pledged to commute to Washington… then racked up over $12,000 in taxpayerfunded commercial trips in first seven months
 Complained of campaigning for seven months without paycheck… though he
has been reimbursed over $50,000 from his campaign
 Slept in his office, citing cost of second home… while owning lakefront
property valued at $190,900 in addition to home
 Hijacked jobs fair for veterans, then called it “Duffy’s Job Fair”
 Pledged minimum of 20 town halls each year… then gave his constituents little
notice before they occurred
 Supported cut to Congressional pay… after saying he struggled to live on his
$174,000 Congressional salary
 Blasted Republicans for representing their party instead of their people… then
voted with his party 90 percent of the time
 Spent More Than Rest of Wisconsin Delegation on Mailers, Office Perks
Duffy’s actions fail to live up to his rhetoric. He pledged to commute to
Washington, then racked up over $12,000 in taxpayer-funded commercial trips in
the first seven months of his holding office. Duffy complained that he campaigned
for seven months without a paycheck, though he was reimbursed over $50,000 by
his campaign. He hijacked a jobs fair for veterans. Duffy pledged a minimum of 20
town halls each year, then gave his constituents little notice before they occurred.
He slept in his office, citing the cost of a second home, while he owned a lakefront
property valued at $190,900 in addition to his home. Duffy supported cutting
Congressional pay, after saying he struggled to live on his $174,000 Congressional
salary. And he blasted Republicans for representing their party instead of their
people, then voted with his party 90 percent of the time. In 2011, Duffy spent more
than the rest of the Wisconsin delegation on mass mailers.
Pledged to Commute to Washington
117
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy pledged to commute to Washington, and that Wisconsin would remain his home.
“I will commute to Washington; Wisconsin will remain my home,” he said. [Marshfield News, 9/21/10]
… Then Took Taxpayer-Funded Commercial Trips Totaling Over $12,000 in First Seven
Months of Office
According to his office’s disbursement reports, Duffy has taken many taxpayer-funded
commercial trips, worth $12,285.40, on commercial transportation:
Date
1/11/11
1/15/11
1/20/11
1/23/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/11/11
2/13/11
2/19/11
2/28/11
3/03/11
3/08/11
3/14/11
3/17/11
4/01/11
4/04/11
4/09/11
4/12/11
4/15/11
4/09/11
4/25/11
5/10/11
5/13/11
5/23/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/03/11
6/13/11
6/16/11
6/21/11
Description
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation*
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Amount
$304.70
$304.70
$609.40
$521.40
$304.70
$305.40
$25.00
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$413.40
$571.40
$521.40
$304.70
$25.00
$304.70
$571.40
$502.40
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$304.70
$803.70
$803.70
-$803.70
$521.40
$521.40
-$521.40
$304.70
$571.40
$304.70
118
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
6/24/11
7/08/11
7/11/11
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
Commercial Transportation
TOTAL
$571.40
$304.70
$304.70
$12,285.40
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
*NOTE: It appears that Duffy was mistakenly reimbursed twice for the same flight, and that he
repaid the reimbursement.
Travel Expenses Later Charged to Duffy’s Official Citibank Government Card
Beginning July 2011, travel expenses were charged to Duffy’s official Citibank Government Card:
Start Date
7/05/11
7/28/11
8/01/11
End Date
7/24/11
8/26/11
8/23/11
Description
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
Travel Subsistence
TOTAL
Amount
$2,773.22
$575.51
$2,444.78
[House Disbursements, 1/01/11-9/30/11]
NOTE: The charges to the office’s Citibank Government Card do not indicate they are specifically
for Duffy’s travel expenses. However, given that Duffy’s being reimbursed for commercial
transportation stops abruptly, and charges to the Citibank Government Card then start appearing,
it is likely that Duffy is charging his travel expenses to his office’s Citibank Government Card.
Said He Would Travel Between Wisconsin and DC Each Week
In 2011, Duffy said he would travel between Wisconsin and DC each week.
“I will not be a congressman who lives in Washington, D.C.,” he said. “I love Wisconsin; I will
only live in Wisconsin. So I will travel back and forth every week.” [County Journal, 1/19/11]
Complained of Campaigning for Seven Months Without Paycheck
In 2011, Duffy said that his decision to resign as Ashland County District Attorney left him without a
paycheck for seven months, and that he struggled to pay his bills during that period. [Wausau Daily Herald,
11/10/11]
… Though He Has Been Reimbursed Over $50,000 by His Campaign
Since announcing his run for Congress in 2009, Duffy has been reimbursed $52,462.51 by his
campaign. [fec.gov, accessed 10/19/11]
NOTE: For full itemization of Duffy’s campaign reimbursements, consult the Campaign Finance
appendix.
Hijacked Jobs Fair for Veterans
119
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines Duffy’s hijacking a jobs fair for veterans:
FIRST: Wisconsin Agency Planned Jobs Fair for Veterans on October 19 in Rothschild
According to the Stevens Point Journal, in 2011, the Wisconsin Department of Workforce
Development originally planned to host a jobs fair on October 19 in Rothschild for veterans
seeking job opportunities. [Stevens Point Journal, 10/17/11]
THEN: Duffy Joined, and October 19 Jobs Fair in Rothschild No Longer Focused on
Veterans
On October 19, 2011, Duffy and the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development organized
a jobs fair in Rothschild that attracted hundreds of job seekers, from college students to the
unemployed. [Wausau Daily Herald, 10/19/11]
Duffy’s Office Called It “Duffy’s Job Fair”
In a 2011 press release announcing the job fair, Duffy’s office referred to it as “Duffy’s
Job Fair.” [Duffy press release, 9/30/11]
… And Duffy Voted to Eliminate Funding for Wisconsin Jobs Programs
In 2011, Duffy voted for a bill that would eliminate funding for the Workforce Investment
Act. [HR 1, Vote #147, 2/19/11; Buffalo BusinessFirst, 2/24/11]
According to the Northern Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board, “Since 2008
northwestern Wisconsin has assisted over 3,125 individuals with skill assessments, case
management, employment support services and/or training service through the Workforce
Investment Act. Most of those individuals have found gainful employment and 64% of the
current adult and dislocated workers are enrolled in training programs.” [NWWIB press
release, 2/17/11]
Pledged to Minimum of 20 Town Halls Each Year
In 2010, Duffy pledged to at least 20 town halls each year, one for each of his counties, and that they
would be in addition to regular district events that he attended.
“I will hold a minimum of 20 town hall meetings (one per county) each year in the district so residents
can talk with me directly. These are in addition to the regular district events I will attend,” he said.
[Marshfield News, 9/21/10]
… Then Gave Constituents As Little As 43 Minutes Notice for Town Halls
On at least two occasions, Duffy has given his constituents little notice of his town halls:
120
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012

On October 20, 2011, the Marshfield News reported that Duffy would be holding a public
forum in Abbotsford the following day. [Marshfield News, 10/19/11]

On November 7, 2011, Duffy’s office sent a press release at 8:02am announcing an
8:45am town hall in Phillips, Wisconsin. [Wausau Daily Herald, 11/12/11]

On November 8, 2011, the Wausau Daily Herald reported that Duffy would have a town
hall for veterans in two days, in Antigo at 8am. [Wausau Daily Herald, 11/08/11]

On November 9, 2011, the Wausau Daily Herald reported that Duffy would have town
halls in Medford and Merrill the following day. [Wausau Daily Herald, 11/09/11]
Criticized by Local Newspaper
In 2011, the Wausau Daily Herald criticized Duffy for his late notices for town hall meetings.
“That’s OK if you can drop everything and head to the meeting. How many of Duffy’s
constituents can do that?” the newspaper asked.
“But the persistence of late notice for his town halls is a blemish on that record of accessibility.
Residents of his district deserve to know well in advance where and when those meetings are
going to be,” the newspaper later wrote. [Wausau Daily Herald, 11/12/11]
Slept in His Office, Citing Cost of Second Home
In 2011, Duffy slept in his Congressional office, citing the cost of a second home. [cbsnews.com, 1/22/11]
… Though He Also Had Lakefront Property Valued At $190,900
In 2011, at the time Duffy said he would sleep in his office, he owned a lakefront property in
addition to his home. The lakefront property was valued at $190,900 in 2010. [Warranty Deed,
Document #2011R-539741, Bayfield County, 8/10/11; Bayfield County Assessor, accessed 11/09/11]
Has Owned Seven Different Lakefront Properties in Addition to Home
Since 2003, Duffy has owned seven different lakefront properties in addition to his home:
Year
2008-2011
2006
2005-2006
2003-2005
2002-2005
2000-2004
2003
Location
Iron River
Bass Lake
Barnes
Hayward
Minocqua
Bass Lake
Hayward
[Parcel #024-1124-03-000, Ashland County;
121
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Parcel #002-109-63-0302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #004-1118-01-990, Bayfield County;
Parcel #010-171-00-4302, Sawyer County;
Parcel #MI-2147-1A, Oneida County;
Parcel #002-145-01-0100 and #002-157-01-0100, Sawyer County;
Parcel #002-940-33-5312, Sawyer County]
NOTE: Duffy potentially also owned lakefront property in White River between 2006 and 2008.
However, the address of the property was unavailable.
Supported Cut to Congressional Pay
In 2011, Duffy supported a cut to Congressional pay. [Leader-Telegram, 4/05/11]
… After Saying He Struggled to Live On His $174,000 Congressional Salary
During a 2011 town hall meeting, Duffy told a constituent, “I struggle to meet my bills right now.”
“With six kids, I still pay off my student loans. I still pay my mortgage. I drive a used minivan,”
Duffy said. “If you think I’m living high on the hog, I’ve got one paycheck. So I struggle to meet
my bills right now,” Duffy said. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
That year, Duffy made $174,000 annually as a Congressman. [Post-Crescent, 4/02/11]
Blasted Republicans for Representing Party Rather Than Their People
In 2010, Duffy blasted Republicans and Democrats for representing their party instead of their people.
“I think the American people will speak [this fall] and say ‘Stop representing your parties and start
representing us,’” he said. [Wausau Daily Herald, 8/23/10]
… Then Voted With His Party 92 Percent of the Time
According to a 2012 vote analysis by the Washington Post, Duffy voted with his party 92 percent
of the time. [Washington Post, Votes Database, accessed 5/02/12]
NOTE: This number is likely to change as Duffy continues to take votes.
Spent More than $152,000 in Taxpayer Dollars on Mass Mailings
In March 2012, WSAW reported that Duffy sent 430,834 mailings from October 1, 2011 to December 31,
2011, costing more than $152,000 taxpayer dollars and costing the average household $0.47.
In response, Duffy’s Director of Communications said, “The freshman congressman feels strongly that
communicating with his constituents is one of the most critical parts of his job. The official mail process
keeps them informed.” [WSAW, 3/19/12]
122
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Spent More on Mass Mailings, Equipment, Other Services, and Travel than Any Other WI
Delegation
In 2011, Duffy spent more on more than other delegation members in four categories. For the year, Duffy
spent more than $225,000 to send out nearly 715,000 pieces of unsolicited mass mail. Duffy was also the
top spender in the delegation on equipment, $27,959; other services, $57,302; and travel, $93,348.
Duffy’s total spending for 2011 was $1.23 million. [Wausau Daily Herald, 4/9/12]
Editorial: “Our View: Duffy mailer costs add up in tax dollars”
In April 2012, the Wausau Daily Herald published an opinion calling Duffy a “spendthrift” when it
“comes to his office’s use of its budget to send unsolicited mass mailings to constituents.” The opinion
also called the spending “excessive.”
The opinion continued, “Duffy ran for office as a fiscal conservative, and he continues to call fiscal
control his key issue as a legislator. He should walk the walk.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 4/15/12]
Said He Would Not Become A Career Politician
In a 2010 op-ed, Duffy said he would not become a career politician.
“Voters can also be assured that I will not become a career politician, nor will I retire from the U.S. House
of Representatives,” he stated. [Duffy op-ed, Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 9/24/10]
… Though He Repeatedly Aspired to Higher Office
In 2003, Duffy considered running for Congress. [Associated Press, 6/22/03]
In 2005, Duffy applied to become a US Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin. [Capital
Times, 5/26/05]
Listed Occupation as “US Senator” on May 2011 Donation
In May 2011, Duffy donated $20 to the Republican Party of Lincoln County, listing his occupation
as “US Senator”. [Republican Party of Lincoln County Campaign Finance Report, July Continuing 2011]
Claimed He Held Town Halls in All 20 Counties In His District
In 2011, Duffy claimed that he held town halls in all 20 counties in his district.
“I cannot be an effective Congressman unless there’s an open line of communication with the people of
the seventh district. It is so important to be accessible and to simply listen to folks from everywhere
around this very large district,” he said. [Duffy press release, 11/15/11]
… And Pledged 20 More
In 2011, Duffy said that he would “look forward to 20 more town halls next year.”
123
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“These town halls have provided an opportunity for an honest conversation about the issues facing
Wisconsin in Congress. Even when folks voice their disagreement, we’ve had a great dialogue and
it’s vital for me to hear the many opinions of those in the seventh. I look forward to 20 more town
halls next year,” he said. [Duffy press release, 11/15/11]
Stopped Running for Congress When He Learned Wife Was Pregnant
In 2004, Duffy said that he was “moving ahead with a campaign” until he found out in the summer of
2003 that his wife was pregnant with a third child.
“I also have a lot of big cases coming up and just decided not to run right now,” he said. [Wausau Daily
Herald, 2/02/04]
… Then Ran for Congress in 2010 Even Though His Family “Will Suffer”
In 2010, Duffy said that he was running for Congress though “my family will suffer.”
“I am a father of six; the oldest is 10, and the newborn is 2 months old. This is not a good time for
me to run for Congress. I am in this because we need people to come in and fight for the next
generation. I am going to engage in that fight. My family will suffer because their dad isn’t home
many nights. But I think that, in the end, they are better off because I am in this race. I have good
old-fashioned Wisconsin common sense,” he said. [National Journal, 6/11/10]
Criticized “Corporate Welfare”
In 2011, Duffy criticized “corporate welfare” in the tax code.
“We have corporate welfare going on,” he said. “There are nooks and crannies in the tax code that allow
these people to hide their money. They don’t pay 35 percent on those dollars. They pay far less than that.
Let’s get rid of all these dark holes where money is hidden. Let’s shine light on the process. Bring it down
and have people pay 25 percent. Instead of paying nothing.” [Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
… But Signed Pledge that Protected Tax Breaks for Companies Shipping Jobs Overseas
As of 2011, Duffy signed a pledge that protected tax breaks to companies shipping jobs overseas.
Signed Americans for Tax Reform’s Federal Taxpayer Protection Pledge
As of 2011, Duffy was a signee of Americans for Tax Reform’s federal Taxpayer
Protection Pledge, stating that he opposed any net reduction or elimination of deductions
and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates. [atr.org, accessed
8/16/11]
President Obama Called for the Elimination of Tax Breaks for Companies that
Create Jobs Overseas
124
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
On May 4, 2009, President Obama stated that his budget would end tax breaks for
companies that ship jobs overseas. The President’s proposal would accomplish this goal by
stopping letting American companies that create jobs overseas to take deductions on their
expenses when they do not pay any American taxes on their profits. [Obama Remarks, 5/04/09]
Voted to Protect Tax Breaks for Big Oil Companies
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have repealed oil and gas production tax
breaks for major integrated oil companies for the proposed two week period in the House budget
continuing resolution.
Rep. William Keating, who offered the motion to recommit, said, “Our alternative is an alternative
of sensible spending cuts. Let’s stop sending taxpayer money to the most profitable companies in
the world.” [CQ Today, 3/01/11]
The motion failed, 176-249. [HJR 44, Vote #153, 3/01/11]
Spent Weekend at South Florida Resort with Lobbyists
In 2012, Duffy and several other Republican freshmen spent a weekend at a South Florida resort where
according to CBS News, “They invited big campaign donors and lobbyists to join them - for a price.”
[CBS News, 3/16/12]
Suggested Focusing on Fixing Federal Spending Rather than Campaign Funding
In April 2012 Duffy said that campaigns should focus less on raising money and more on fixing federal
spending.
“We have to address this debt. We owe almost 16-trillion dollars. For the last four years this country has
borrowed over a trillion dollars every year, we have to change course,” Duffy said. [Northland News Center,
4/23/12]
…Yet Duffy Raised $269,087.49 in the First Quarter of 2012
In the first three months of 2012 Duffy raised $269,087.49 for his re-election campaign. [FEC 2012
First Quarter Report, filed 4/15/12]
Announced Park Funding for His District
In June 2011, Duffy announced an $11,000 grant from the National Park Foundation Park Stewards Grant
Program for Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. The funding will be used to give teachers immersive
training in the park’s mission, resources, and responsibilities. [Ashland Current, 6/30/11]
Voted to slash park funding
125
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
On February 19, 2011, Duffy voted to reduce the National Park Service’s budget by $240 million
for 2011, a cut of 8.8 percent from the previous year. [Senate Committee on Appropriations, 4/11/11; H.R.
1 Roll Call Results, 2/19/11]
Financial Disclosure Had Multiple Errors
In Duffy’s June 2011 financial disclosure for 2010, he and his wife listed assets valued between $110,011
and $400,000 and obligations valued between $210,006 and $550,000. His debt was halved since his
candidate financial disclosure because, according to Duffy’s spokesman, Duffy did not list his mortgage
on his most recent disclosure as he is not required to do so.
Duffy also failed to list several investments on his most recent disclosure form. The investments appeared
on his previous form and disappeared with no indication of any transactions. Son said that he sold those
investments, each worth between $1,000 and $15,000, but failed to mention it on his form. Son said,
“They were sold during the disclosure period, and the value for each should have been listed as 'none.’
Congressman Duffy is amending his candidate financial disclosure to reflect that.”
Duffy did not explain why he was paid $12,312 in his final six weeks as Ashland County DA, a rate of
about $2,000 a week, when he was previously paid about $1,800 a week. [Journal Sentinel, 6/22/11]
Denied Raising His Own Pay, Blamed Discrepancy on a Delay in the State Payroll System
In June 2011, Duffy denied raising his pay during his final six weeks as Ashland County district
attorney. The state Democratic Party accused Duffy of giving himself a raise from $1,800 to
$2,000 per week in the final six weeks as Ashland County District Attorney.
Duffy’s spokesman responded, “the difference in salary reflects the payroll system for state
employees. There is a lag between the pay period and the payday. (Duffy’s) financial disclosure
did not reflect the lag in payment. There was no increase in DA Duffy’s pay…As you know, state
employees do not set their own salaries. Congressman Duffy did not receive a raise.” [Superior
Telegram, 6/24/11]
Went on $1,600 Heritage Foundation Trip to the Four Seasons near L.A.
In January 2011, Duffy traveled to Los Angeles for a Heritage Foundation event. The toal cost was
$1,692. After the two-and-a-half day event, Duffy spent another day in Los Angeles at his own expense.
His wife also attended; her expenses were $1,503.
Duffy claimed the purpose of the trip was “educational meetings arranged by Heritage Foundation..”
Duffy, however, missed several of the educational events due to his prior personal plans. According to the
disclosure, “Rep. Duffy missed some events on January 27th due to late arrival because of the weather as
well as some events on January 29th due to personal plans.”
Duffy stayed at the $225-a-night Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village outside Los Angeles. The location
was selected because “the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library’s Centennial Celebration and the
Congressional Class of 1980’s 30th Anniversary Celebration are essential themes of our retreat,”
according to the Foundation.
126
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Prior to the trip, the Foundation provided a “good faith estimate” of $1,717, roughly equal to the actual
expenses.
Duffy and his wife enjoyed an additional day in California at their own expense. They also enjoyed Los
Angeles at Heritage’s expense; their “personal plans” apparently took precedence over the “educational
meetings” on the conference schedule. [Duffy Travel Disclosure, 2/15/11]
Went on Trips that Might Be “Skirting Ethics Rules”
According to the Stevens Point Journal, in 2011 Duffy and his wife went on a privately funded trip that
might be “skirting ethics rules.” The trip was a three day retreat in Simi Valley, CA, sponsored by the
Heritage Foundation, a think tank associated with Heritage Action for America, a lobbying group.
Although the trip was approved by the House Ethics Committee, the fact the sponsoring groups have
lobbying adjuncts might violate the spirit of a law that prohibits trips financed by any group that hires
lobbyists. [Stevens Point Journal, 3/14/12]
Duffy Spokesperson Claimed Trip Was “Educational”
Brandon Moody, a spokesperson for Duffy said Duffy attended the retreat for its educational
value. “These things are educational; this isn't playing golf,” he said. [Stevens Point Journal, 3/14/12]
Challenged to Give Up Government Health Insurance
In July 2011, the Council of Wisconsin Aging Groups (CWAG) challenged the five members of
Wisconsin’s House delegation who voted to end Medicare to give up their government health insurance.
They targeted Reps. Ribble, Petri, Duffy, Sensenbrenner, and Ryan. [The Cap Times, 7/15/11]
Duffy Hired Former Lobbyist to Work on Official Staff
In March 2011, the Center for Responsive Politics released a database showing that Duffy had hired Brian
Blom to be his LD. According to CRP, Blom had previously lobbied for Van Scoyoc Associates. [Center
for Responsive Politics, accessed 3/8/11]
Communications Director Left to Become a Lobbyist
In July 2011, Politico Influence reported that Duffy’s communications director, Daniel Son, left his office
to join Hamilton Place Strategies as a director. [Politico Influence, 7/28/11]
127
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
… Pay-to-Play Issues
Significant Findings
 Accepted over $56,000 from securities industry and $72,000 from commercial
banking industry… while voting against a host of government policies to
regulate those industries
 Accepted over $120,000 from agribusiness interests… while voting against
consumer product safety
 Accepted over $25,000 from retail interests… while voting to protect merchants
who use credit card transactions
Duffy has been tainted by a culture of corruption. He has accepted over $56,000
from the securities industry and $72,000 from the commercial banking industry,
all while voting against a host of government policies to regulate those industries.
Duffy accepted over $120,000 from agribusiness interests, while voting against
consumer product safety. And he accepted over $25,000 from retail interests, while
voting to protect merchants who use credit card transactions.
Accepted Significant Funding from Investment and Commercial Banking Industries
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted significant funding from the investment and the commercial banking
industries:
Accepted Over $56,000 from Securities and Investment Industry
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $56,150 from the securities and investment industry.
[opensecrets.org, accessed 11/15/11]
Accepted Over $72,000 from Commercial Banking Industry
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $72,908 from the commercial banking industry. [opensecrets.org,
accessed 11/15/11]
… While Repeatedly Voting to Stymie Attempts to Reform Wall Street
In 2011, as a member of the Financial Services Committee, Duffy repeatedly voted to stymie
attempts to reform Wall Street:
128
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: For detailed information regarding Duffy’s votes to stymie regulation of the banking
industry, consult the “Financial Reform Issues – Wall Street Oversight” section.
Voted To Delay The Effective Date Of Most Derivatives Market Provisions in 2010
Financial Regulatory Overhaul
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would delay the
effective date of most derivatives market provisions of the 2010 financial regulatory
overhaul (PL 111-203) from July 2011 until Sept. 30 2012. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage,
5/24/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, as amended, 30-24. [HR 1573,
5/24/11]
Voted Against Holding Credit Rating Agencies Liable for Misstatements and
Omissions
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would repeal a
provision of the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203) that makes credit
rating agencies liable if their ratings of asset-backed securities included in public offering
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission contain material
misstatements or omissions. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 7/20/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 31-19. [HR 1539, 7/20/11]
Voted Against Prohibiting Regulators From Approving Risky Covered Bond
Programs
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that
would prohibit a regulator from approving a covered bond program unless it determines
that it would not increase the risk of or actual losses to the FDIC’s insurance fund. [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 26-28. [Covered Bond Program Requirement Amendment to HR 940,
6/22/11]
Voted to Limit SEC Funding Until SEC Optimized Resources Already Available
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s
fiscal 2012 budget views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee.
The Financial Services panel says that it cannot support the administration’s budget
proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending discipline.
Those views and estimates included the statement that the committee will only consider
additional funding for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after the
commission has optimized its available resources by implementing initiatives
129
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
recommended in a recently completed study that was authorized by the financial overhaul
measure (PL 111-203). [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and
Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted Against Requiring Companies to Disclose Employees’ Median Compensation
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that
would replace the language in the bill to repeal current law requiring publicly traded
companies to disclose their employees’ median compensation separately from CEO pay
packages with language to require companies to calculate their employees’ median
compensation using the cash compensation of domestic employees, and report that
information annually. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-27. [Compensation Disclosure Amendment to HR 1062, 6/22/11]
Accepted Over $120,000 from Agribusiness Interests
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $124,137 from agribusiness interests. [opensecrets.org, accessed 11/15/11]
… While Voting Against Consumer Product Safety
In 2011, Duffy voted against various proposals to ensure consumer product safety:
Voted to Remove Protections on Food, Toys, and Drinking Water
In February 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have required Congressional
committees to place a high priority on tracking, reviewing and preserving the standards
that ensure the safety of the food and drinking water supply, and the safety of children’s
toys.
“This is and should be an essential function of our nation’s government,” said motion
sponsor Rep. Russ Carnahan, D-Mo. [CQ Today, 2/11/11]
The motion failed, 178-242. [HR 72, Vote #32, 2/11/11]
Voted to Keep Vital Consumer Product Information from Consumers
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would bar funds to related to launching the
consumer product safety information database established under the Consumer Product
Safety Act and signed into law by President George Bush.
According to the Wichita Eagle, the amendment offered by Rep. Mike Pompeo, would
delay the site to make changes that Pompeo and the business community would prefer.
One of Pompeo’s changes would be to make it harder for consumer groups and lawyers to
submit product complaints. [Wichita Eagle, 3/07/11]
130
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The amendment was adopted, 234-187. [HR 1, Pompeo amendment #545, Vote #137, 2/19/11]
Accepted Over $25,000 from Retail Interests
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $25,450 from retail interests. [opensecrets.org, accessed 11/15/11]
… While Voting To Protect Merchants Who Use Credit Card Transactions
The following outlines Duffy’s votes to protect merchants who use credit card transactions:
Supported Allowing Merchants to Charge Premium for Using Credit Cards
In 2011, Duffy supported allowing merchants to take a discount for payments in cash, and
to charge a premium for payments using credit cards.
“Duffy said he’d favor changes that allow merchants to give a discount for cash, or to
charge a premium for the use of plastic,” the Wausau Daily Herald reported. [Wausau Daily
Herald, 5/22/11]
Supported Delaying Implementation of Cap on Card Swipe Fees
In 2011, Duffy supported delaying the implementation of a cap on card swipe fees.
“For Congress to set the price is a pretty extreme move,” he explained. “The merchants
would say, ‘Well, we’re in an extreme situation.’ I understand their concern. I get their
concern. I don’t necessarily like the way we’re addressing their concern.” [Wausau Daily
Herald, 5/22/11]
131
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Abortion and Family Planning Issues
Significant Findings
 Was 100 percent pro life without exceptions
 Co-sponsored bill to redefine rape
Duffy is deeply pro-life. He said he was “100 percent pro-life without exceptions,”
and though Duffy made an exception when a mother’s life was at risk, he did not
make an exception for victims of rape. He also co-sponsored a bill that would
redefine rape.
Was 100 Percent Pro-Life Without Exceptions… Except When Mother’s Life At Risk
In a 2010 interview with the Catholic Times, Duffy said, “I am 100 percent pro-life without exceptions.”
“It’s pretty straightforward. To qualify, I believe that if we have the life of a mother as an issue, the
mother’s life takes priority, but we must make every effort to save the life of the child.” [The Catholic Times,
10/21/10]
Did Not Make Exception for Victims of Rape
In a 2010 debate, when asked if he would allow victims of rape to have an abortion, Duffy stated
that he was 100 percent pro life and that he thought life began at conception:
MODERATOR: So you would force that woman to have the child of her rapist?
DUFFY: Glen, I’ve answered the question. I’m 100 percent pro-life. I believe
that life begins at conception. [“Duffy/Lassa Debate Highlights” on WPR.org, 10/28/10]
Co-Sponsored Bill to Redefine Rape
In 2011, Duffy co-sponsored the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortions Act, which would
redefine a ban on federal funding for abortions to exempt only “forcible rape” and not
“rape” generally. [HR 3 Co-Sponsors, 112th Congress]
According to the Washington Post, the Act would make a version of the Hyde Amendment
permanent. The Hyde Amendment, which had been renewed every year since 1976,
prevented some federally-funded health care programs from covering abortions, with
exceptions in cases of rape and incest, and when the life of the woman is threatened.
132
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
However, under the language proposed by the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortions Act,
rape becomes “forcible rape.” The Washington Post reported that the bill’s critics believed
“the modifier could distinguish it from other kinds of sexual assault that are typically
recognized as rape, including statutory rape and attacks that occur because of drugs or
verbal threats.” [Washington Post, 2/01/11]
Opposed Taxpayer Funding for Abortions
In 2010, Duffy opposed taxpayer funding for abortions. [Associated Press, 5/27/10]
Supported Parental Notification for Minors Seeking Abortions
In 2010, Duffy supported parental notification for minors seeking abortions. [Associated Press, 5/27/10]
Voted to Prohibit Any Government Funding for Planned Parenthood
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would bar all funding for Planned Parenthood Federation of
America or its affiliates.
Conservatives had long targeted Planned Parenthood as a major abortion provider but the amendment
would bar all federal funding. Planned Parenthood received some $75 million received to provide family
planning assistance, contraception, HIV counseling, cancer screenings and other medical services.
According to Susan Cohen, director of governmental affairs at the Guttmacher Institute research
organization, for every dollar spent on contraception for low-income women, the government saves four
dollars in medical costs within the next year by averting unwanted pregnancies. [New York Times, 2/17/11]
A New York Times editorial pointed out that Republicans’ assault on women’s health would deny
millions of women access to affordable contraception and life-saving cancer screening, as well as cut
nutritional support for millions of newborn babies. [New York Times, Editorial, 2/25/11]
The amendment passed, 240-185. [HR 1, Pence amendment #11, Vote #93, 2/18/11]
133
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Budget Issues
Significant Findings
 Supported Ryan Roadmap
 Voted for Ryan Budget
 Supported freezing federal non-defense discretionary spending at 2008 levels
 Voted against increasing debt limit
 Supported massive cuts to federal programs that cost jobs
Duffy supported policies that undermine the federal government. He supported
both the Ryan Roadmap, which would privatize Social Security and Medicare, and
he voted for the Ryan Budget, which would turn Medicare into a voucher program.
Duffy supported freezing federal non-defense discretionary spending at 2008 levels
and voted against increasing the debt limit. Duffy further supported massive cuts to
federal programs that cost jobs.
Supported Ryan’s “Roadmap For America’s Future”
During his 2010 campaign, Duffy repeatedly expressed support for Congressman Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap
for America.” [Marshfield News, 7/16/10]
NOTE: Duffy’s campaign said that he did not necessarily support the components of Ryan’s Roadmap.
Praised Ryan’s Roadmap
In a 2010 interview, Duffy said, “I think Paul Ryan has some very good ideas in his Roadmap for
America.” [Upfront with Mike Gousha, Minute 6:18, 5/23/10]
Duffy separately called the Roadmap “one of the best proposals to get our country back on track.”
[politico.com, 10/01/10]
Ryan Roadmap Would Privatize Social Security
In 2010, Ezra Klein of the Washington Post explained the implications that Ryan’s budget
alternative would have on Social Security:
134
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“Social Security gets guaranteed, private accounts that CBO says will actually cost more than the
present arrangement, further underscoring how ancillary the program is to our budget problem.”
[Washington Post, 2/01/10]
CBO: Ryan Budget Would Create Individual Accounts
According to CBO Analysis, under the Ryan Budget:
Traditional retirement benefits would be reduced below those scheduled under current law
for many workers who are age 55 or younger in 2011... A system of individual accounts
would be established in 2012. In that year, workers who are age 55 or younger would be
able to participate in voluntary individual accounts, funded with a portion of their payroll
taxes. [Congressional Budget Office letter To Paul Ryan, 1/27/10]
CBPP: Ryan’s Plan Would Divert Funds From Social Security into Private Accounts
A July 2010 report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analyzing
Representative Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap for America’s Future” included changes to Social
Security including diverting large sums from Social Security to private accounts.
“It also would divert substantial sums from the Social Security trust funds into private
accounts and then maintain Social Security solvency by transferring funds to Social
Security from the rest of the budget.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 7/07/10]
Leading Privatization Supporter: There’s No Difference Between Privatization and
Personal Accounts
According to the Star Tribune, “The word ‘privatization’ has been part of the Social
Security debate for many years and has been used by many Republicans. The Cato
Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington and an advocate of the idea, used to call its
effort ‘the project on Social Security privatization.’”
From the Star Tribune:
Michael Tanner, director of that project, agrees that the Democrats are
using the word because they think it’s scarier but said he thinks the
Republicans are wrong to reply with “a silly, semantic argument.”
“Republicans like to say they’re a little bit for privatization, then, when the
Democrats attack them, they curl up in a fetal position and talk about how
much they love their grandmother.”
Instead, he suggests, Republicans should defend the position that
individual accounts are the best way to save Social Security.
Cato has a fresh poll that Tanner said shows that when the issue is
properly framed, a majority of Americans favor individual accounts.
Still, he said, word choices are important. So Cato recently changed the
135
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
name of the program to “the project on Social Security choice.” [Star
Tribune, 8/5/02]
Leading Privatization Opponent: Individual Accounts Means “Privatization”
According to AARP, “‘Privatization’ is often used as shorthand for the idea of taking some
of the money workers currently pay into the Social Security system and diverting it into
individually owned accounts, where each worker would bear some risk for how his or her
investments performed. These accounts would
be ‘carved-out’ of Social Security.”
From AARP:
Diverting money away from Social Security and into individual accounts
is risky and involves trading some of today’s inflation protected, lifetime
guaranteed benefit for an account subject to market risk and not
guaranteed to last a lifetime or keep pace with inflation. Inflation, market
turns or loss of employment can mean that your private account may not
have enough money to provide an adequate benefit.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of debate on the semantics rather than the
substance. Essentially it doesn’t matter if you call the concept
‘privatization,’ ‘personalization,’ or anything else—diverting Social
Security revenues into individual accounts shifts risk to the individual and
hurts the financial status of Social Security itself.” [AARP via pbs.org]
Ryan Roadmap Would Privatize Medicare
In 2010, Ezra Klein of the Washington Post explained the implications that Ryan’s budget
alternative would have on Medicare and Medicaid:
“As you all know by now, the long-term budget deficit is largely driven by healthcare costs. To move us to surpluses, Ryan’s budget proposes reforms that are
nothing short of violent. Medicare is privatized. Seniors get a voucher to buy
private insurance, and the voucher’s growth is far slower than the expected
growth of health-care costs. Medicaid is also privatized. The employer tax
exclusion is fully eliminated, replaced by a tax credit that grows more slowly than
medical costs. And beyond health care, Social Security gets guaranteed, private
accounts that CBO says will actually cost more than the present arrangement,
further underscoring how ancillary the program is to our budget problem.”
[Emphasis added; Washington Post, 2/1/10]
Paul Krugman: Roadmap Privatizes Medicare
In 2010, Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman explained that the Ryan Roadmap
would privatize Medicare:
136
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“In the Ryan proposal, nobody currently under the age of 55 would be
covered by Medicare as it now exists. Instead, people would receive
vouchers and be told to buy their own insurance. And even this new,
privatized version of Medicare would erode over time because the value
of these vouchers would almost surely lag ever further behind the actual
cost of health insurance. By the time Americans now in their 20s or 30s
reached the age of eligibility, there wouldn’t be much of a Medicare
program left.” [Emphasis added; New York Times, 2/11/10]
Center for American Progress: Roadmap Privatizes Medicare
In 2010, Pat Garofalo writing for the Center for American Progress’ Wonk Room called
the Republican proposal, “a radical budget proposal that eliminates long-term deficits by
essentially privatizing Medicare and Social Security and placing arbitrary, non-specific
freezes on all non-discretionary spending.” [Emphasis added; Center for American Progress, 2/6/10]
Ryan Roadmap Would Lower Taxes For Wealthiest Americans
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ryan Roadmap would dramatically
lower taxes for the wealthiest Americans, while increasing the tax burden for middle-income
groups. According to the estimates the Tax Policy Center issued this week, average tax cuts under
the plan would equal:
-$1.7 million a year for the highest-income 0.1 percent of Americans (those with incomes
over $2.9 million a year in 2009 dollars)
-$502,000 a year for people with incomes over $1 million
-$280,000 a year for people in the top 1 percent of the population (those with incomes over
$633,000) [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3114#_ftn3,
accessed 9/1/10]
Ryan Roadmap Would Raise Taxes on Middle Class Families by $788
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ryan Roadmap would raise taxes on
the bulk of taxpayers. According to the CBPP, those, “with incomes between $20,000 and
$200,000 — would see their taxes go up. For example, those with incomes between $40,000 and
$50,000 would see their taxes rise by an average of $788.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3114#_ftn3, accessed 9/1/10]
Ryan Roadmap Would Eliminate Income Taxes on Corporations And Investments Earned
on Wall Street
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ryan Roadmap would eliminate
income taxes on corporations and investments earned on Wall Street. The CBPP says the Ryan
proposal would make sweeping changes to the federal tax system. It would:
137
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
-Repeal the corporate income tax and replace it with an 8.5-percent value-added tax, a
form of sales tax on most goods and services
-Entirely exempt capital gains, dividends, and interest from taxation [Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3114#_ftn3, accessed 9/1/10]
Ryan Roadmap Would Increase Debt
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ryan Roadmap would allow debt to
increase.
As a result of its costly new tax cuts for the wealthy, the Ryan plan would allow the
federal debt to continue rising in relation to the size of the economy for at least four
decades. Even in CBO’s analysis of the Ryan plan, which assumed — as Ryan’s staff
specified but the Tax Policy Center has found to be incorrect — that revenues would not
fall below their projected levels under current tax policies until after 2030, the federal
debt would grow as a share of GDP until 2043, and the budget would not reach balance
until 2063. Under the much more realistic revenue estimates that the Tax Policy Center
has prepared, the budgetary outlook under the Ryan plan would be substantially worse.
Using TPC’s new revenue estimates, we estimate that the budget deficit under the Ryan
plan would reach about 7 percent of GDP and the debt would grow to 90 percent of GDP
by 2020. TPC estimates that revenues under the Ryan plan would average 16.3 percent of
GDP over the period from 2011 through 2020.
In contrast, following the specifications provided by Rep. Ryan’s staff, the CBO analysis
assumed that revenues over the same period would average 18.4 percent of GDP. That
difference amounts to a loss of almost $4 trillion in revenues over the next decade. As a
result of these lower revenues, federal interest costs would also be much higher than
those shown in the CBO analysis.
Extrapolating TPC’s revenue estimates beyond 2020 shows that the
Ryan plan would fail to stem the rising tide of debt for years to come.
[5] The debt would continue to grow in relation to the size of the
economy for at least 40 more years — reaching over 175 percent of
GDP by 2050. (See Figure 1.) Even by 2080, the debt would still
equal about 100 percent of GDP. [6] [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3114#_ftn3, accessed 9/1/10]
Voted for 2011 Ryan Budget
In 2011, Duffy voted for the 2011 budget resolution proposed by Congressman Paul Ryan. [Associated
Press, 4/15/11]
The resolution passed, 235-193. [H Con Res 34, Vote #277, 4/15/11]
Duffy Specifically Defended Budget’s Medicare Provisions
138
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In an interview with the Wausau Daily Herald, Duffy specifically defended the Ryan budget’s
Medicare provisions.
“I think all of us who voted for it are on board,” he said. “To vote to reform Medicare, you sure
better think there’s a problem if you’re going to take that vote.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 5/19/11]
… Though The Ryan Budget Would End Medicare
According to the Wall Street Journal, “The plan would essentially end Medicare, which now pays
most of the health-care bills for 48 million elderly and disabled Americans, as a program that
directly pays those bills.” [Wall Street Journal, 4/4/11]
Plan Will Lead to “Rationing”
According to NPR:
The CBO warned that higher payments could affect care as beneficiaries might be less
likely to use “new, costly, but possibly beneficial, technologies and techniques.”
According to NPR, that is “exactly the sort of rationing that so frightened Republicans
when they were fighting the health law – the health law that Ryan’s proposal would repeal,
by the way.” [NPR, 4/06/11]
Joe Baker, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said that “to ask people with Medicare
and Medicaid to foot the entire bill is not only unfair, but it will eventually lead to much
less care and a type of rationing […] There’s no doubt that putting more costs on
consumers, particularly upfront, leads them to access less care.” [National Journal, 4/04/11]
NCPSSM: Plan “Destroys Medicare and Cuts Social Security Benefits”
In April 2011, Max Richtman, executive vice-president of the National Committee to
Preserve Social Security and Medicare, told an audience that Ryan’s 2012 budget plan
“forces millions of American seniors to help foot the bill for a budget plan that puts the
needs of middle-class Americans far below preserving tax cuts for corporations and
wealthy Americans.”
“The Ryan plan would replace the current Medicare program with vouchers and leave
seniors and the disabled - some of our most vulnerable Americans - hostage to the whims
of the private marketplace,” Richtman said. [NCPSSM press release, 4/05/11]
Ryan Plan Brings Back “Donut Hole” Coverage Gap for Prescription Drugs
According to the Associated Press, Ryan’s plan brings back the coverage “gap in the
Medicare prescription drug” benefit. [Associated Press, 4/06/11]
National Debt Increases $8 Trillion Under Ryan Budget
139
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Under Ryan’s budget, the national debt would still increase $8 trillion over the coming decade to
$23 trillion. [Roll Call, 4/06/11]
CBO: Debt Rises During First 10 Years of Ryan’s Budget
According to an initial analysis by the CBO, they found that by the end of the 10 year
budget window, public debt would actually be higher. CBO projected under current law
the debt would balloon to 67 percent of GDP by 2022; under Ryan’s plan, the CBO
expects it to rise to 70 percent. [Congressional Budget Office, 4/05/11; The Atlantic, 4/06/11]
Warned of Backlash If GOP Cuts Go Too Far
In February 2011, Duffy warned told The Hill newspaper that there would be a backlash if Republicans’
cuts went too far.
He said, “I never talked about $100 billion, I talked about '08 levels and I think the conference talked
about '08 levels…I see it with my constituents. They want us to cut back, but I think it's possible to go too
far . . . I think real reform is going to come when both parties sit down and talk about Social Security and
Medicare. It's got to be a bipartisan solution. Otherwise, as we've seen in history, both parties will snipe at
each other.” [The Hill, 2/15/2011]
Supported Freezing Federal Non-Defense Discretionary Spending at 2008 Levels
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported freezing federal non-defense discretionary
spending at 2008 levels.
“Since 2008, non-defense discretionary spending has risen 84 percent. Returning non-defense
discretionary spending to 2008 levels would save up to $925 billion,” he argued. [duffyforcongress.com,
accessed 8/10/11]
… But Separately Specified Non-Defense Non-Security Discretionary Spending
In a 2010 interview, Duffy specified that he supported a non-defense, non-security discretionary
spending freeze.
“The first thing I want to do is return non-defense and non-security discretionary spending to 2008
levels,” he said. [Central Wisconsin Sunday, 10/31/10]
Voted Against Increasing Debt Limit
In 2011, Duffy voted against a bill that would increase the statutory debt limit by $2.406 trillion to $16.7
trillion in a bill aimed at increasing the statutory limit on the public debt. The voted failed under
suspended rules, 97-318. [HR 1954, Vote #379, 5/31/11; CQ Floor Votes, 5/31/11]
Opposed Debt Ceiling Increase “On The Backs” of Entrepreneurs and Small Businesses
140
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2011, Duffy opposed a debt ceiling increase that “attempts to solve our economic problems on
the backs of our entrepreneurs and small business owners — the very people we need to put
people back to work.”
“We don’t help job seekers by punishing our job creators,” he explained. [County Journal, 7/20/11]
Called 2011 Debt Deal “One Of The Great Moments Of The House”
In 2011, Duffy called that year’s deal to raise the debt ceiling “one of the great moments of the House.”
[Leader-Telegram, 8/02/11]
Supported Massive Cuts to Federal Programs that Cost Jobs
In 2011, Duffy supported massive cuts to federal programs that cost jobs.
Duffy Was a Member of the Republican Study Committee
As of January 2011, Duffy was listed as a member of the Republican Study Committee. [Republican
Study Committee member list]
While Duffy Was a Member of the Republican Study Committee, It Proposed the Spending
Reduction Act of 2011
In January 2011, while Duffy was a member of the Republican Study Committee, it proposed the
Spending Reduction Act of 2011. [Rep. Jim Jordan press release, 1/20/11]
The Act was introduced to the Congress and referred to several House committees. [112th Congress,
HR 408]
Spending Reduction Act of 2011 Called for Cuts of More than 40 Percent to NonDefense Discretionary Spending
According to 2011 analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Spending
Reduction Act of 2011 would cut non-defense discretionary spending by more than 40
percent.
“By 2021, it would reduce non-defense appropriations by 42 percent below what the
Congressional Budget Office says is needed to maintain last year’s funding level, adjusted
only for inflation,” the CBPP blog read. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities blog, 1/21/11]
Cuts to Non-Defense Discretionary Spending Cost Jobs
According to 2011 analysis by the Economic Policy Institute, cuts to non-defense
discretionary spending would cost jobs.
“Focusing on deficits now is not only a distraction, but actually undermines the goal of
generating more jobs. In fact, making these cuts to the discretionary budget would
141
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
reduce the number of jobs available significantly. Okun’s rule of thumb states that when
gross domestic product (GDP) declines, there is a correlating increase in unemployment. A
$60 billion cut, when assigned a fiscal multiplier of 1.5, would impact GDP by roughly
$90 billion for the rest of this fiscal year alone. This would result in a decline in output by
a little more than one-half of a percentage point of GDP, resulting in a loss of around
590,000 jobs,” the Economic Policy Institute reported. [Emphasis added; “Discretionary Spending
Cuts Would Reduce Jobs, Hurt Social Programs”, epi.org, 1/25/11]
After Attack for His RSC Ties, Duffy Accused Democrats of Being Out of Touch
After Duffy was attacked by the DCCC for his ties to the Republican Study Committee, Duffy
accused Democrats of being out of touch. He explained that his constituents wanted to see
government spending put in check, and if Democrats “are trying to convince folks that a second
stimulus is the answer, they’re out of touch.” [Gannett News Service, 2/04/11]
Voted for $61 Billion in Draconian Cuts for Rest of 2011 Fiscal Year
In 2011, Duffy voted for $61 billion in draconian cuts for a continuing resolution to finish fiscal year
2011.
The cuts slashed the maximum Pell Grant by $845; would drop 218,000 children from the Head Start
program; would cut 55,000 teachers and teacher assistants from schools; could result in 5,500 fewer
researchers compared to FY 2010 funding and 20,000 fewer researchers compared to the FY 2011
request; cut $1.6 billion from the National Institutes of Health; cut $250 million border security
technology funding; and would result in a total loss of 700,000 jobs. [Democratic Leader press release]
An analysis by the investment bank Goldman Sachs predicted that the Republican spending cuts would
cause great damage to the economy, slowing growth by as much as two percentage points in the second
and third quarters of 2011. [Washington Post, 3/13/11]
The measure passed, 235-189. [HR 1, Vote #147, 2/19/11]
Voted for Balanced Budget Amendment
In 2011, Duffy voted for a Balanced Budget Amendment that would prohibit Congress from spending
more than it receives in revenues.
It would also require a three-fifths majority in both chambers to raise the debt ceiling, and require the
President to submit a balanced budget to Congress.
“For the sake of our children and grandchildren, we have to act now to balance our budget,” Duffy said.
“For too long, Washington has promised cuts and fiscal responsibility while only spending more of our
money. I was sent here to put the brakes on this out of control spending, and that starts with a Balanced
Budget Amendment. This Amendment already received bipartisan support in the 1990’s - there is no
reason it shouldn’t have the same support today when we’re that much further in the hole.” [Duffy press
release, 11/18/11]
142
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Said Military Would Have to Do More With Less
In 2011, while discussing the federal budget, Duffy said that the military would have to do more with less.
[Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
.. Then Supported Fully Funding Efforts of American Troops
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported fully funding the efforts of American
troops. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Would Consider Military Pensions for Budget Reforms
In 2011, Duffy said he would be reluctant to change military pensions, but that he would consider
everything to reform the budget. [Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
Supported 2010 War Funding Bill
In 2010, Duffy said he would have voted for that year’s war funding bill, however acknowledging
questions of what defined “victory”.
“What does success mean? I don’t know if I’ve heard a very good answer,” he said.
“The base level (for me) of success is there’s not more terrorist camps (there) that can launch attacks on
our country and kill American citizens.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 8/07/10]
Criticized US Debt
In 2010, Duffy criticized the US debt, saying that irresponsible federal spending was “borrowed out of
China.” [Record Review, 2/17/10]
Said US Had A Spending Problem
In 2011, Duffy said that the US had a spending problem.
“I share many of the President’s stated goals, because we share a common crisis: a $14 trillion
debt, $53 trillion in unfunded liabilities and a $1.6 trillion deficit this year alone,” he explained.
“Yet where we diverge is that the President believes we have a revenue problem; I believe we
have a spending problem.” [Leader-Telegram, 4/14/11]
Supported Passing A Budget Every Year
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported passing a federal budget every year.
“We can’t successfully get our government house in order if a budget isn’t created as a starting point,” he
argued. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/10/11]
Praised Paul Ryan’s 2011 Budget Proposal
143
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2011, Duffy praised Paul Ryan’s budget proposal, saying it was a “bold proposal that provides a
comprehensive plan to rein in the size and scope of the federal government, empowers the private sector
to create jobs and puts us on a path to a sustainable and prosperous future, all the while ensuring that we
keep our promises to our seniors.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/06/11]
Later Said He Had No Problem Voting For It
In 2011, Duffy said he had no problem voting for Ryan’s budget proposal, saying, “I didn’t have a
problem voting for it at all.” [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 4/16/11]
Voted to Set Spending Caps Without Disclosing Dollars Amounts
In 2011, Duffy voted to adopt a resolution setting a spending cap reducing non-security discretionary
spending to fiscal 2008 levels.
The resolution did not provide specifics, such as a dollar amount or definition of non-security spending.
Democrats criticized the resolution as a “public relations exercise” timed by Republicans in advance of
that evening’s State of the Union address by President Obama. [CQ Today, 1/25/11]
“You have no idea what you are voting on,” Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said of the resolution without
numbers. Rep. Jim McGovern challenged each Republican speaker, “What’s the number, what’s the cut?”
[Politico, 1/25/11]
The resolution passed, 256-165. [H Res 38, Vote #20, 1/25/11]
Voted Against 2011 RSC Budget Alternative
In 2011, Duffy voted against an amendment to the 2011 budget resolution that would replace it with the
Republican Study Committee’s “Honest Solutions” budget resolution. [RSC press release, 4/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 119-136. [H Con Res 34, Vote #275, 4/15/11]
Voted Against Additional $22 Billion in Cuts
In 2011, Duffy voted against an additional $22 billion in cuts, pushed by conservative freshmen and the
Republican Study Committee. The amendment would have reduced funding for the legislative branch by
11 percent and all other continuing resolution funding by 5.5 percent, with exemptions for the Department
of Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs and for aid to Israel.
Out of 87 freshmen Republicans, 58 – or about two-thirds – voted in favor of the amendment.
The cuts were so extreme that Republican Study Committee member Jo Bonner said he worried that the
amendment “would take a more indiscriminate, hatchet approach” to the budget. Dan Lungren, a former
RSC chairman, said, “Across-the-board cuts are lazy members’ way to achieve something.” Lungren also
warned colleagues that the amendment would “paralyze” the U.S. Capitol Police [CQ Today, 2/18/11;
Washington Post, 2/18/11]
144
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The amendment was rejected, 147-281. [HR 1, Blackburn amendment #104, Vote #103, 2/18/11]
Predicted a “Day of Reckoning” Unless U.S Cuts Spending
In March 2012, while commenting on the U.S. debt, Duffy said “We owe 15 trillion dollars in national
debt. This year we are going to borrow 1.3 trillion dollars. This is not sustainable and to continue to
borrow and spend at these levels there will be a day of reckoning like in Greece.” [Northland’s News Center,
3/29/12]
145
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Campaign Finance and Election Law Issues
Significant Findings
 Asked opponent to agree to voluntary campaign spending limits
 Criticized opponent for pursuing campaign finance reform while accepting
PAC funds
 Supported term limits
Duffy asked his Democratic opponent to agree to voluntary campaign spending
limits, and criticized his opponent for pursuing campaign finance reform while
accepting PAC funds. Duffy also supported term limits.
Asked Obey to Agree to Voluntary Campaign Spending Limits
In 2010, Duffy asked Obey to agree to voluntary campaign spending limits. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
3/06/10]
Criticized Obey for Pursuing Campaign Finance Reform While Accepting PAC Funds
In 2010, Duffy criticized Obey for pursuing campaign finance reform while accepting PAC funds.
“Promising to limit the influence of special interests while they’re bankrolling your campaign is
hypocritical,” he said. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 3/06/10]
Supported Term Limits
In 2010, Duffy pledged to support legislation establishing term limits for members of Congress. [Marshfield
News, 9/21/10]
Voted Against Requiring Disclosure of Foreign Countries, Companies Donating to Presidential
Campaigns
In 2011, Duffy voted against requiring the disclosure of certain foreign entities donating to presidential
campaigns, as well as donors spending over $100,000 on those contests.
The motion to recommit would have required, more specifically, the disclosure of foreign countries,
companies or individuals donating to presidential campaigns. [CQ Weekly, 1/31/11]
The motion failed, 173-229. [H. Res. 359, Vote #24, 1/26/11]
146
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted to Terminate Public Funding of Presidential Campaigns, “Pander” to Corporate Money
In 2011, Duffy voted to terminate the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which provided public
funding during presidential elections. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the move would
reduce mandatory spending by $617 million over 10 years.
The fund was established in the wake of the Watergate scandal and provided matching funds for
presidential primary candidates and grants for general election candidates who comply with spending and
contribution limits. The fund was financed through check-offs on income tax returns. An amendment,
offered by Rep. Gary Peters, added language specifying that funds returned to the Treasury could only be
used for reducing the benefits. [CQ Today, 1/26/11]
In an editorial in the New York Times, the paper noted that House Republicans were “pandering to the
new corporate money trough legitimized by the Supreme Court” by cutting off the funding.
“The public subsidy remains popular in the public polls. Opponents may invoke budget savings – an
estimated $52 million a year – but there is no mistaking their aim is to destroy what has been a bulwark
against the buying and selling of the presidency.” [New York Times, Editorial, 2/26/11]
The bill passed, 239-160. [HR 359, Vote #25, 1/26/11]
Supported Constitutional Amendment to Limit Campaign Spending
In January 2012, Duffy told the Wausau Daily Herald that he supported a constitutional amendment that
would limit political spending by corporations, unions and political action committees. Duffy said “You
can’t say ‘I want to take away this pot of money that supports this party, but I want to leave this pot
intact.’ All the pots have to go. I would absolutely support that.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 01/24/12]
Supported Putting Hard Limits on Campaign Donations
In a January 2012 interview with the Wausau Daily Herald Editorial Board, Duffy said he would like to
see a limit placed on the money that goes into campaigns. Duffy also said “he would support a
constitutional amendment that limits corporate, union and political action committee spending meant to
influence politicians and elections.” According to the Wausau Daily Herald, Duffy said he would like to
eliminate money from special interest groups because “you don't know where the money is coming from.”
[Wausau Daily Herald, 1/09/12]
Re-election Campaign Raised More than $250,000 in Q4 2011
In early February of 2012, Duffy announced that his re-election campaign raised more than a
quarter of a million dollars in the last three months of 2011, and more than $1.1 million overall.
This led Robert Mentzer of the Wausau Daily Herald to call Duffy’s rhetoric on money in politics
“seriously incoherent” and said “[i]t is sort of like if Madonna had come out against glitzy excess
a couple of weeks before her Super Bowl halftime show.” [Mentzer column, Wausau Daily Herald,
2/9/12]
One of the Top Recipients of Corporate Donations
147
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In February 2012, Wausau Daily Herald columnist Robert Mentzer wrote that Duffy “has raked in
a lot of corporate cash” and that Duffy was one of the top three recipients of corporate donations
as analyzed by politicspa.com. [Mentzer column, Wausau Daily Herald, 2/9/12]
Big Donors Include the Koch Brothers and Citizens United Victory Fund
Duffy received $2,500 from the Koch PAC and $5,000 from the Citizens United Victory Fund —
the firm from the court case Duffy said he’d overturn. [Mentzer column, Wausau Daily Herald, 2/9/12]
Introduced Legislation Banning Insider Trading from Congress
In January 2012, Duffy authored an opinion piece in the Ashland Current, which he expressed touted the
Restoring Ethical Standard, Transparency and Responsibility in Congressional Trading Act (RESTRICT
Act). The RESTRICT Act would require all members of Congress and their senior staff to move their
assets to a blind trust or disclose any transaction within three days. “The RESTRICT Act is the only way
to stop any real or perceived insider trading by members of Congress.” Duffy wrote. [Ashland
Current,01/18/12]
Because the STOCK Act “doesn’t go far enough”
Duffy criticized the STOCK Act because it “doesn’t go far enough and, frankly, has loopholes you
can drive a truck through.” Duffy touted the RESTRICT Act as “one of those rare bills that can
help restore confidence in government and unite common-sense Americans on both sides of the
aisles.” [Ashland Current,01/18/12]
148
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Consumer Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted to remove protections on food, toys, and drinking water
 Voted to keep vital consumer product information from consumers
 Supported allowing merchants to charge premium for using credit cards
Duffy voted to remove protections on food, toys, and drinking water. He voted to
keep vital consumer product information from consumers, and supported allowing
merchants to charge premium for using credit cards.
Voted to Remove Protections on Food, Toys, and Drinking Water
In February 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have required Congressional committees to
place a high priority on tracking, reviewing and preserving the standards that ensure the safety of the food
and drinking water supply, and the safety of children’s toys.
“This is and should be an essential function of our nation’s government,” said motion sponsor Rep. Russ
Carnahan, D-Mo. [CQ Today, 2/11/11]
The motion failed, 178-242. [HR 72, Vote #32, 2/11/11]
Voted to Keep Vital Consumer Product Information from Consumers
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would bar funds to related to launching the consumer product
safety information database established under the Consumer Product Safety Act and signed into law by
President George Bush.
According to the Wichita Eagle, the amendment offered by Rep. Mike Pompeo, would delay the site to
make changes that Pompeo and the business community would prefer. One of Pompeo’s changes would
be to make it harder for consumer groups and lawyers to submit product complaints. [Wichita Eagle, 3/07/11]
The amendment was adopted, 234-187. [HR 1, Pompeo amendment #545, Vote #137, 2/19/11]
Supported Allowing Merchants to Charge Premium for Using Credit Cards
In 2011, Duffy supported allowing merchants to take a discount for payments in cash, and to charge a
premium for payments using credit cards.
149
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“Duffy said he’d favor changes that allow merchants to give a discount for cash, or to charge a premium
for the use of plastic,” the Wausau Daily Herald reported. [Wausau Daily Herald, 5/22/11]
Supported Delaying Implementation of Cap on Card Swipe Fees
In 2011, Duffy supported delaying the implementation of a cap on card swipe fees.
“For Congress to set the price is a pretty extreme move,” he explained. “The merchants would say, ‘Well,
we’re in an extreme situation.’ I understand their concern. I get their concern. I don’t necessarily like the
way we’re addressing their concern.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 5/22/11]
Voted To Reauthorize National Flood Insurance Program
In 2011, Duffy voted for a bill that would reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program through
Sept. 30, 2016.
The bill would provide authority to temporarily suspend mandatory purchase requirements for those in
special flood hazard areas. Under the bill, local governments may request an extension for 12 months and
may receive no more than two extensions.
The measure would set minimum annual deductibles for subsidized rate properties covered by the
program at $2,000 and minimum annual deductibles for actuarial rate properties at $1,000. It would index
maximum coverage limits to the rate of inflation.
The bill would increase to 20 percent, from 10 percent, the annual limitation on premium increases.
It would require flood insurance rate maps to differentiate between a property that is located in a flood
zone and a structure located on that property but which is elevated, and therefore, not at the same risk of
flooding. As amended it would prohibit FEMA from issuing or updating flood insurance maps that omit
or disregard protection afforded by levees.
The legislation would provide for a five-year phase-in of flood insurance rates for newly mapped areas. In
the first year of an area being designated as having special flood hazards, the premium rate for insurance
would be 50 percent of the rate otherwise applicable. The rate would then increase by 20 percent each
year until it is equivalent to other areas.
It would allow the purchase of private flood insurance to satisfy the mandatory flood insurance purchase
requirement for properties in flood hazard areas.
As amended, the bill would allow the FEMA to reimburse property owners for the cost of obtaining a
letter of map amendment if FEMA’s map includes a “bona fide error.”
It would specify that legal or attorney fees would not be eligible for reimbursement.
150
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
It would require an annual plan to notify homeowners in special flood hazards regarding mandatory
purchase requirement applicability and rate phase-ins. It also would require notification to tenants of the
availability of flood insurance and how to obtain insurance.
As amended it would funds designated for community development block grants to provide assistance to
local government agencies responsible for floodplain management activities to encourage and facilitate
the purchase of flood insurance and increase awareness of flood-risk reduction.
As amended it would require FEMA to notify elected officials of impacted states about actions to revise
or update flood plain areas or flood-risk zone maps.
The bill would establish a Technical Mapping Advisory Council, composed of officials from FEMA, the
Army Corps of Engineers and others, to develop new mapping standards for 100-year flood insurance rate
maps. The bill would then direct FEMA to establish new standards for rate maps based on the council’s
recommendations.
The bill would give authority to the mapping advisory council to consider whether to use vertical
positioning for flood insurance rate maps.
The measure also would require reports to Congress on strategies for privatizing the National Floor
Insurance Program as well as on the financial status of the program. It also would require FEMA to
annually assess the ability of the program to pay claims for losses.
As amended it would allow FEMA to provide grants for flood mitigation activities directly to
homeowners who have received flood insurance coverage payments on two or more claims for losses. [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the House, 54-0. [HR 1309, 5/13/11]
151
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Crime and Public Safety Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted to cut drug intelligence funding
 Voted against funding for AMBER alerts
Duffy voted to cut drug intelligence funding, and voted against funding for
AMBER alerts in public broadcasting.
Voted to Cut Drug Intelligence Funding, Fire Hundreds
In 2011, Duffy voted to zero-out funding for the National Drug Intelligence Center by striking $34
million in funding.
The NDIC, which employed hundreds in Johnstown, PA, was established by the late Rep. John Murtha,
but criticized for being a “pet project.”
Rep. Mark Critz countered that there was a “misperception” that the NDIC duplicated work by other
agencies. He said there was a “basic misunderstanding regarding the types of drug intelligence.” The
Center’s document and media exploitation service supported federal prosecutors in drug cases. [TribuneDemocrat, 2/16/11]
The amendment passed, 262-169. [HR 1, Flake amendment #368, Vote #51, 2/16/11]
Voted Against Funding for AMBER Alerts in Public Broadcasting
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure to ensure that National Public Radio would still be able to
receive federal funding to broadcast or disseminate emergency AMBER Alerts regarding abducted
children.
According to the DOJ’s AMBER Alert website, there have been 532 successful recoveries with 120 total
Amber Alert plans nationwide. In calendar year 2009, 207 AMBER Alerts were issued in the U.S., Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands involving 263 children. Of those 207 cases, 166 resulted in a recovery,
45 of which were successfully recovered as a direct result of those respective AMBER Alerts being
issued. [Department of Justice, AMBER Alert statistics; 2009 AMBER Alert report]
Rep. Button Sutton, who introduced the motion, said in her floor remarks that National Public Radio,
which the Republicans sought to defund, was a disseminator of the alerts via an arrangement with the
Department of Justice. [Rep. Sutton Floor Remarks, 3/17/11]
The motion failed, 184-235. [HR 1076, Vote #191, 3/17/11]
152
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Duffy then VOTED AGAINST prohibiting federal money from being used to fund or purchase content
from National Public Radio. [HR 1076, Vote #192, 3/17/11]
Voted to Restore COPS Funding by $298 Million
In 2011, Duffy voted to restore funding for the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program
at the Justice Department by $298 million. The funds came from decreasing the same amount from crossagency support at NASA.
Cuts under the Republicans’ original continuing resolution plan totaled some $600 million.
Amendment sponsor Rep. Anthony Weiner acknowledged he was “taking from one place to give to
another. But I do believe it’s in the interest of all of us to try to set these priorities straight.” [Politico,
2/16/11]
The amendment passed, 228-203. [HR 1, Weiner amendment #125 as modified, Vote #53, 2/16/11]
Voted for Funding Firefighter, First Responder Assistance
In 2011, Duffy voted for increased funding for FEMA firefighter assistance grants by $510 million. The
amendment specified that $390 million be available for firefighter assistance grants and $420 million be
available for Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grants.
The amendment passed, 318-113. [HR 1, Pascrell amendment #223, Vote #60, 2/16/11]
153
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Earmark Issues
Significant Findings
 Introduced motion to ban earmarks
 … Though he said not all earmarks were bad
Duffy is strongly opposed to earmarks, though he once said that not all earmarks
were bad.
Introduced Motion to Ban Earmarks
In 2010, Duffy introduced a motion to ban earmarks.
The motion was backed by the House Republican Caucus. [Capital Times, 11/24/10]
… Though He Said Not All Earmarks Were Bad
In November 2010, Duffy said that not all earmarks were bad. [Herald Times Reporter, 11/15/10]
Pledged to Forswear Earmarks
In 2010, Duffy said he planned to forswear earmarks if he were elected to Congress.
“With a $13 trillion debt, we can’t afford it anymore,” Duffy said. “At some point, we all have to
be part of the solution. We can’t just say, give me ours, but say that no one else can have any.”
[politico.com, 5/07/10]
Criticized Bills With Hidden Earmarks and Unrelated Provisions
In 2010, Duffy criticized Democrats and Republicans for introducing bills that hid earmarks or
included provisions unrelated to the main purpose of the bill.
He took specific issue with a provision in the health care reform law that required companies to
report certain vendor payments.
“What is that doing in a health care bill?” Duffy said. “As a member of Congress, you can throw
up your arms and say ‘That’s just the way things are,’ or make a change.” [Wausau Daily Herald,
10/14/10]
Voted to End Funding for the “Bridge to Nowhere”
154
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In March 2011, Duffy voted for a measure that would have prevented funding for the notorious Alaskan
“Bridge to Nowhere.” The motion to recommit would have rescinded $183 million in funding for
planning, design and construction of the Gravina Island and Knik Arm bridges in Alaska.
The motion specifically rescinded all unobligated balances provided for the planning or construction of
the both bridges. Rep. Jared Polis, who introduced the measure, noted that a CBO study estimated that the
motion would reduce the deficit by $160 million. [CQ Today, 3/02/11]
The motion failed, 181-246. [HR 662, Vote #159, 3/02/11]
Voted Against Defense Department Spending Millions on NASCAR Sponsorships
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would bar the Department of Defense from sponsoring
NASCAR race cars.
The Army spent approximately $7 million on NASCAR endorsements, down from $11.6 million in 2009,
and another $5 million on drag racing. The Marine Corps, Navy, and Coast Guard had all dropped their
sponsorships of NASCAR in 2006. [National Journal, 2/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 148-281. [HR 1, McCollum amendment #50, Vote #90, 2/18/11]
Voted to Save $35 Billion and Cut Alternate Engine for Strike Fighter
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would cancel funding for an alternate engine for the F-35
Joint Strike Fighter, cutting an additional $450 million and saving up to $3 billion over several years. The
Joint Strike Fighter was the nation’s most expensive weapons program.
The Bush and Obama administrations had tried to kill the alternate engineer for over five years and many
Tea Party-affiliated Republicans broke ranks with Speaker John Boehner who supported the program.
Work on the engine provided more than 1,000 jobs near his district. [New York Times, 2/16/11]
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said the F136 cost about $28 million a month to continue and had
urged its termination. [CQ Today, 2/16/11]
The amendment was adopted, 233-198. [HR 1, Rooney amendment #2, Vote #46, 2/16/11]
155
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Economic Stimulus and Financial Bailout
Significant Findings
 Strongly critical of federal stimulus
 Wanted to end all bailouts
 Criticized auto bailout… even arguing government should have let GM go
bankrupt
 Criticized cash for clunkers
 Criticized bank bailout and voted to end TARP… but accepted nearly $30,000
from employees and PACs of bailed out banks
Duffy is strongly critical of the economic stimulus and financial bailout. He cited
the stimulus as one of the reasons he ran for Congress, and called the program
“using our children’s money to buy votes.” Duffy said he wanted to end all
bailouts, criticizing the bank and auto bailouts, and even argued that the
government should have let GM go bankrupt. Duffy also criticized the Cash for
Clunkers program and voted to end TARP, though he accepted nearly $30,000
from employees and PACs of bailed out banks.
Decided to Run for Congress After Stimulus Passed Congress
In 2010, Duffy said that he decided to run for Congress, challenging Congressman Dave Obey, after Obey
introduced and shepherded the federal stimulus bill through Congress.
“This was congress’ way of taxing and spending our way out of this recession, all the while passing the
bill off to our next generation here,” he said. “… I’m concerned about the debt my kids and the kids of
Wisconsin are going to inherit because of this spending spree.” [Superior Telegram, 9/01/10]
Criticized Federal Stimulus
In 2009, Duffy criticized the federal stimulus.
I’ve been thinking about this for awhile but what really pushed me over the edge was Dave Obey’s
fiscal irresponsibility in Washington -- seeing the bailout and then the stimulus and now this new
budget, and what that means for my children. It’s unacceptable and unsustainable,” he said. [Daily
Telegram, 7/09/09]
156
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Said Stimulus Was “Using Our Children’s Money to Buy Votes”
In 2010, Duffy accused the stimulus of “using our children’s money to buy votes.”
Duffy explained that the money “is being borrowed from China,” and that “using our children’s
money to buy votes…isn’t gonna work this cycle.” [Spooner Advocate, 2/19/10]
Said Stimulus “Stimulated Nothing But More Government Debt”
In 2011, Duffy said that the federal stimulus “stimulated nothing but more government debt.”
[Duffy op-ed, Washington Times, 7/21/11]
Wanted to Return $500 Billion of $700 Billion Stimulus Package
In 2010, Duffy said he wanted to return $500 billion of the $700 billion stimulus package.
“This is an utter failure,” he said. “I’d say give it back to so we can pay off our debt to the
Chinese.” [Record Review, 2/17/10]
Supported Cancelling Unspent Stimulus and TARP Funds
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported cancelling unspent stimulus and TARP
funds.
“The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates canceling TARP funds would save $16
billion. Rescinding all unobligated stimulus funds would save up to $266 billion,” he argued.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/10/11]
Wanted to End All Bailouts
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to end all bailouts.
“Bailouts are only providing more uncertainty, not the stability we need. Furthermore, like the stimulus
funds, bailout money is primarily going to government jobs. Less than 1 percent of stimulus funds went to
small businesses,” he argued. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/10/11]
Criticized Federal Bailout
In 2009, Duffy criticized the federal bailout.
I’ve been thinking about this for awhile but what really pushed me over the edge was Dave Obey’s
fiscal irresponsibility in Washington -- seeing the bailout and then the stimulus and now this new
budget, and what that means for my children. It’s unacceptable and unsustainable,” he said. [Daily
Telegram, 7/09/09]
Criticized Auto Bailout
157
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2009, Duffy criticized the auto bailout. [Stevens Point Journal, 4/23/10]
… And Argued Government Should Have Let GM Go Bankrupt
In 2009, Duffy took specific issue with the auto bailout, saying the government should have
allowed the company to go bankrupt.
“The structure has been set,” he said. “It should be sent back to the private market as soon as
possible.” [Stevens Point Journal, 4/23/10]
Criticized Cash for Clunkers
In 2009, Duffy criticized the Cash for Clunkers program.
“Cash For Clunkers: I am sure the class of 2025 is delighted that Dave Obey plans to borrow another 2
billion from China in their name,” he wrote. [Duffy4Congress twitter, 8/01/09]
Criticized Bank Bailout
In 2009, Duffy criticized the bank bailout. [Stevens Point Journal, 4/23/10]
… And Wanted to Stop TARP Spending After Late 2010
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to stop TARP spending after October 3,
2010. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
… But Accepted Nearly $30,000 from Employees and PACs of Bailed Out Banks
As of 2011, Duffy accepted $29,675.00 in campaign donations from employees and PACs of
bailed out banks.
NOTE: For an itemized list of Duffy’s bailout donors, consult the Campaign Finance appendix.
Voted to Recommend Termination of Troubled Asset Relief Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee recommends the termination of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the foreclosure
prevention initiative known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, the Emergency Homeowner
Relief Fund and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
158
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Criticized Democratic Opponent for Crafting Federal Stimulus
In 2009, Duffy attacked his Democratic opponent, Congressman David Obey, for helping craft the federal
stimulus. [Washington Times, 8/25/09]
… And Blamed Opponent When Website Reporting Stimulus Funds Had Mistakes
In 2009, Duffy blamed Obey for errors on a website responsible for tracking stimulus funds.
“Dave Obey is the author of the stimulus bill, and his attempt to point fingers at someone else for
his $787 billion tax-payer boondoggle is outrageous,” Duffy said. [Green Bay Press-Gazette, 11/18/09]
Started Website Attacking Opponent for Stimulus
In 2010, Duffy started a website www.obeystimulus.com that attacked Obey for helping craft the
federal stimulus. [Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, 2/19/10]
159
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Education Issues
Significant Findings
 Skeptical of paying teachers’ salaries because they were too high on the
economic “food chain”
 Voted against protecting Pell Grants from $39 million cut

Duffy was skeptical of the federal stimulus’ paying teachers’ salaries because,
according to Duffy, teachers were too high on the economic “food chain.” He also
voted against protecting Pell Grants from a $39 million cut.
Skeptical of Paying Teachers’ Salaries Because They’re Too High on the “Food Chain”
In 2010, Duffy was skeptical of stimulus funding paying teachers’ salaries because teachers were too high
on the economic “food chain.”
“The teacher jobs are good jobs, I believe in education,” Duffy said. “But those salaries come from those
in the community who have jobs and pay taxes, and if you don’t stimulate the private sector so they can
pay their taxes which pay the teachers, the whole system breaks down.”
“So to think we are just going up one step up the food chain and just take care of the teachers but not take
care of the people who actually take care of the teacher’s salary, the taxpayer, it doesn’t work. It can’t
work. You will keep them for a year or two, but if this thing doesn’t grow, they will have to be laid-off at
some point because there is not enough tax base to support them, which is basic common sense.” [Spooner
Advocate, 3/07/10]
Voted Against Protecting Pell Grants from $39 Million Cut
In February 2011, Duffy voted against an amendment that would have increased funds for Federal Pell
Grants by $39 million, offset by a reduction in funds available for Department of Education Program
Administration.
The amendment was not adopted 186-238. [HR 1, Vote #146, 2/19/11]
160
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Energy Issues
Significant Findings
 Wanted to explore iron mining in his region
 Supported drilling in America for oil
Duffy wanted to explore iron mining in his region and supported drilling in
“energy-rich regions” of America for oil.
Said He Would Like to Explore Iron Mining in Region
In 2010, Duffy said that he would like to explore iron mining in the region.
“Not only could we mine it we could turn it into steel here and even fabricate here,” he said. “You look at
a depressed area like Ashland with that kind of resource, it would be a multi-billion-dollar investment just
to get it prepared to mine and to do it cleanly with a minimal impact on the environment.” [Spooner
Advocate, 3/07/10]
Supported Drilling in “Energy-Rich Regions” of America for Oil
In 2011, Duffy supported a bill that would, in his words, “open up energy-rich regions of America to
sensible and environmentally sound exploration.” [Superior Telegram, 5/13/11]
Supported End to Moratorium on Issuing Offshore Drilling Permits
In 2011, Duffy co-signed a letter to President Obama that requested “an end to the de facto
moratorium and a return to the timely and responsible issuance of offshore drilling permits.” [Letter
to President Obama, Handled by Department of Interior, 2/18/11]
Emphasized that Oil Drilling Should Not Be Shut Down
In 2010, though Duffy supported a “respite” from drilling, he emphasized that the Gulf disaster
should not shut down off-shore drilling. [Stevens Point Journal, 5/14/10]
… After Saying US Needed A “Respite” From Drilling In Wake of Gulf Oil Disaster
In May 2010, Duffy said that the US needed a “respite” from drilling after the oil disaster in the Gulf of
Mexico. [Marshfield News, 5/14/10]
Said There Was Insufficient Regulation of Off-Shore Oil Drilling
161
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy said that there was insufficient regulation of off-shore oil drilling. [Marshfield News,
5/14/10]
Voted to Make It Easier to Drill in Alaska
In 2011, Duffy voted for a bill that would ease environmental rules to make it easier for Shell Oil Co. and
other energy firms to obtain exploratory drilling permits for the Outer Continental Shelf of Alaska.
[Wisconsin State Journal, 6/25/11]
Supported “All-Of-The-Above” Energy Policy
In 2011, Duffy supported an “all-of-the-above” energy police that included domestic energy sources.
[Duffy op-ed, Superior Telegram, 5/13/11]
Voted to Cut Defense Department Research on Alternative Energies
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would reduce funding for Defense Department procurement,
research and innovation programs by $115.5 million. The aim of reduced funding was for alternative
energy research.
The amendment failed, 109-320. [HR 1, Pompeo amendment #86, Vote #44, 2/15/11]
Voted to Increase Home Heating Assistance by $50 Million
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would increase funding for Low Income Home Energy
Assistance Programs (LIHEAP) by $50 million. The amendment would reduce funding for substance
abuse and mental health services at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration by
$98 million.
The amendment was rejected, 104-322. [HR 1, Bass amendment #565, Vote #71, 2/17/11]
Claimed that Opening U.S. Oil Leases would Lower Gas Prices
In March 2012, while speaking on a radio program entitled “Insight 2012” Duffy claimed that if the U.S.
opened up all of its oil leases “and we start putting more supply into the market, it’s very simple supply
and demand. As demand increases and supply does as well we don’t see those prices increase. But when
demand increases and supply doesn’t increase with it, we start to see an increase in prices. So I think we
have an opportunity in America to increase that supply and help stabilize gas prices.” [YouTube, 3/12/12]
162
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Environmental Issues
Significant Findings
 Opposed cap and trade legislation
Duffy opposed cap and trade legislation.
Opposed Cap and Trade Legislation
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed cap and trade legislation.
“The Obama Administration already admitted that this bill could cost American
families up to $1,700 a year with higher electric bills and more expensive products,” he argued.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/10/11]
163
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Financial Reform Issues – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Significant Findings
 Introduced bill to replace CFPB director with partisan commission
 Voted to require simple majority vote to overturn rules by CFPB
 Voted against making it harder to overturn rules by CFPB that would protect
military personnel and elderly
Duffy is strongly critical of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
supporting policies to undermine the agency. He introduced a bill to replace the
director with a partisan commission, voted to require a simple majority to overturn
rules by the CFPB, and voted against making it harder to overturn rules by the
CFPB that would protect military personnel and the elderly.
Said New Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Could Hurt Consumers
In 2011, Duffy claimed that the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau could hurt customers
“because of the additional regulatory burden it creates for small, local financial institutions.” [Duffy op-ed,
Washington Times, 7/21/11]
Introduced Bill to Replace CFPB Director with Partisan Commission
In 2011, Duffy introduced a bill that would “would replace the director with a bipartisan commission and
establish a meaningful review process of CFPB rulings that are inconsistent with the safety and soundness
of the banking system.”
“This bill doesn’t get rid of the CFPB, it simply recognizes the reality that we cannot separate consumer
protection from the safety and soundness of the banking system,” Duffy explained. [Duffy op-ed, Washington
Times, 7/21/11]
… Then Voted To Limit Political Representation on CFPB
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for an amendment that would stipulate
that the commission established to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau be comprised
of the vice chairman for supervision of the Federal Reserve System and four additional members.
It would require that no more than two of the commission’s members belong to the same political
party. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was adopted, 32-22. [Royce Amendment to HR 1121, 5/13/11]
164
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted To Replace Director of CFPB With Commission
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would replace the director
of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with a five-member commission to lead the
agency, which was created by the 2010 financial overhaul law (PL 111-203).
As amended the bill would require that the commission be comprised of the vice chairman for
supervision of the Federal Reserve System and four additional members. Under the bill, each
commissioner would be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
As amended, the bill would require that no more than two members serving at any time be from
the same political party.
It would require that each commissioner be a U.S. citizen and have consumer financial protection
experience. It also would prohibit board members from holding other employment.
Under the bill, a commissioner could only be removed from office for inefficiency, neglect of duty
or malfeasance in office.
As amended it would require one of the commissioners to focus on protecting older consumers,
veterans, minorities and youth from unfair, deceptive and abusive lending practices.
It would require the board to approve any requests for appropriations made by the chairman. [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House (as amended), 33-24. [HR 1121, 5/13/11]
Voted to Require Senate Confirmation of CFPB Director Before CFPB Could Start
Working
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial
Institutions and Consumer Credit for a bill that would require Senate confirmation of the director
of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before the agency can assume the functions outlined
by the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203). [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/04/11]
The bill was approved for full committee consideration, 13-8. [HR 1667, 5/04/11]
Voted to Replace CFPB Director With Senate-Confirmed Board
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial
Institutions and Consumer Credit for a bill that would replace the director of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with a five-member board to lead the agency, which was
created by the 2010 financial overhaul law (PL 111-203).
165
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Under the bill, each board member would be nominated by the president and confirmed by the
Senate. The bill would require that no more than three members serving at any time be from the
same political party.
It would require that each board member be a U.S. citizen and have consumer financial protection
experience.
It also would prohibit board members from holding other employment.
Under the bill, a board member could only be removed from office for inefficiency, neglect of
duty or malfeasance in office.
It would require the board to approve any requests for appropriations made by the chairman. [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/04/11]
The bill was approved for full committee consideration, 13-7. [HR 1121, 5/04/11]
Voted Against Allowing CFPB To Begin Working When Senate Confirms Director or
Prevents Confirmation Vote
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would allow
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to assume the functions outlined by the 2010 financial
regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203) on the date the Senate confirms a director or the date that
the Senate votes on any procedural motion that prevents a confirmation vote, whichever is earlier.
[CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-33. [Miller Amendment to HR 1667, 5/13/11]
Voted To Require Senate Confirmation for CFPB Director Before CFPB Could Begin
Working
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would require Senate
confirmation of the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before the agency can
assume the functions outlined by the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203). [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 32-26. [HR 1667, 5/13/11]
Voted to Require Simple Majority Vote to Overturn Rules By CFPB
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial Institutions and
Consumer Credit for a bill that would require a majority vote rather than a two-thirds vote for the
Financial Stability Oversight Council to overturn rules by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The bill would require the Financial Stability Oversight Council to overturn any rules it finds inconsistent
with the safe and sound operations of U.S. financial institutions, rather than if it endangers the stability of
the entire financial system. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/04/11]
166
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The bill was approved for full committee consideration, 13-9. [HR 1315, 5/04/11]
Voted To Make It Easier to Overturn CFPB Rules
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would require a majority
vote rather than a two-thirds vote for the Financial Stability Oversight Council to overturn rules by
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The bill would require the Financial Stability Oversight Council to overturn any rules it finds
inconsistent with the safe and sound operations of U.S. financial institutions, rather than if it
endangers the stability of the entire financial system. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 35-22. [HR 1315, 5/13/11]
Voted Against Making It Harder to Overturn CFPB Rules Regarding Financial Protection of
Military Personnel
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language from the bill that would require a majority vote rather than a two-thirds vote for the Financial
Stability Oversight Council to overturn rules by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The amendment would require a majority vote of the members serving, excluding the director to overturn
rules by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. It would require a two-thirds vote to overturn rules
where the primary purpose is the financial protection of military personnel. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage,
5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-32. [Waters Amendment Regarding Military Personnel to HR 1315, 5/13/11]
Voted Against Making It Harder to Overturn CFPB Rules Regarding Financial Protection of Older
Americans
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language from the bill that would require a majority vote rather than a two-thirds vote for the Financial
Stability Oversight Council to overturn rules by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The amendment would require a majority vote of the members serving, excluding the director to overturn
rules by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. It would require a two-thirds vote to overturn rules
where the primary purpose is the financial protection of older Americans. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage,
5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-32. [Waters Amendment Regarding Older Americans to HR 1315, 5/13/11]
Voted Against Requiring CFPB Chair To Want To Protect Military Personnel From Abusive
Financial Practices
167
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial Institutions and
Consumer Credit against an amendment that would require the president to appoint as chairman of the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) someone who is credited with coming up with the idea for
the CFPB, advocated for the agency’s creation, wants to make the prices and risks of financial products
clear, and wants to protect military personnel and their families from abusive financial practices. [CQ
Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/04/11]
The amendment was rejected, 6-13. [Maloney Amendment to HR 1121, 5/04/11]
Voted Against Reaffirming Independent Funding for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would revise
language on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to reaffirm “the importance of
maintaining the CFPB’s funding independence, as is the case with the other federal banking regulators.”
It also would acknowledge the need for oversight of the continued development of the CFPB. [CQ
Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 19-27. [Waters Amendment to Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted Against Requiring Evaluation of Financial Institution’s Comments on CFPB Proposed Rules
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require
federal banking regulators to evaluate a financial institution’s claim in comments on a proposed rule by
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the rule would impact its safety and soundness.
It would require the CFPB and federal banking regulators to determine whether non-insured depository
institutions already offer products or services that would comply with the proposed rule and if they are
able to operate profitably.
It would require the CFPB to determine if the alleged safety and soundness concerns are attributable to
the proposed rule or other factors within the control of the institution.
It would require the CFPB and federal banking regulators to consider the financial safety and soundness
of consumers who would be affected by the proposed rule and weigh the costs to consumers of not
proceeding with or weakening the proposed rule. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 24-33. [Miller Amendment to HR 1315, 5/13/11]
Voted Against Allowing Treasury Secretary to Carry Out Functions of CFPB
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would allow the
Treasury secretary to carry out the functions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau if the Senate
has not confirmed a director. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-33. [Maloney Amendment to HR 1667, 5/13/11]
168
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted Against Requiring CFPB Members To Have Experience With Consumer Protection
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial Institutions and
Consumer Credit against an amendment that would require no less than three members of the commission
charged with running the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to have experience in the
protection of and advocacy for consumers in the market for financial products and services.
It would require one member of the commission to have the primary responsibility of the oversight of the
agency’s activities related to protecting consumers from abusive, deceptive and unfair lending practices.
[CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/04/11]
The amendment was rejected, 6-13. [Velazquez Amendment to HR 1121, 5/04/11]
Voted to View Request for Funding Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as Excessive
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee views the administration’s request of $329 million for the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau (CFPB) as excessive and plans to examine whether the bureau’s funding should be subject to the
congressional appropriations process -- as opposed to the current arrangement in which the CFPB director
determines the agency’s budget, which is drawn from the Federal Reserve Board’s annual combined
earnings. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted Against Soliciting Public Comment on Regulations From Consumer Protection Advocates
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to solicit public
comment from consumer protection advocates and small business advocates on its proposed rules and
regulations.
It also would require the SEC and CFTC to solicit public comment on the risks and consequences for
small businesses and consumers caused by postponing or exempting entities from final rules and
regulations.
The amendment was rejected, 23-30. [Velazquez Amendment Regarding Public Comment to HR 1573, 5/24/11]
Voted to Table Motion to Appeal Ruling that Amendment Protecting Consumers Was Not
Germane
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on Financial Institutions and
Consumer Credit for a motion that would table (kill) the Gutierrez, D-Ill., motion to appeal the ruling of
the chair that the Gutierrez amendment was not germane.
169
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The Gutierrez amendment would require the comptroller of the currency to make available to the public
an analysis of how each proposed rule will impact consumer protections and consumers. [CQ Markup & Vote
Coverage, 5/04/11]
The motion was agreed to, 8-4. [Renacci Motion regarding HR 1315, 5/04/11]
Voted Against Requiring First CFPB Chair to Have Come Up With Idea for CFPB
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require the
president to appoint as chairman of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) commission
someone who is credited with coming up with the idea for the CFPB, advocated for the agency’s creation,
wants to make the prices and risks of financial products clear, and wants to protect military personnel and
their families from abusive financial practices. As amended it would specify that the criteria apply only to
the first chairman appointed. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was rejected, 15-38. [Maloney Amendment to HR 1121, 5/13/11]
Voted To Task CFPB Commission Member to Focus on Lending for Minorities and Youth
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for an amendment to the Velazquez
amendment that would include minorities and youth in the group of consumers that the underlying
Velazquez amendment tasks one member of the commission to focus on protecting from unfair, deceptive
and abusive lending practices. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 5/13/11]
The amendment was adopted, 30-25. [Duffy Amendment to Velazquez Amendment to HR 1121, 5/13/11]
170
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Financial Reform Issues – Housing Assistance
Significant Findings
 Wisconsin ranked one of worst in nation for foreclosure rates
 Repeatedly voted against providing foreclosure relief… even for rural
homeowners
 Repeatedly voted to terminate emergency loans to homeowners facing
foreclosure… even for veterans and active service members
 Voted to shut down mortgage aid program… even for seniors
Though Wisconsin is ranked one of the worst in the nation for foreclosure rates,
Duffy repeatedly voted against programs to help homeowners facing foreclosure.
He repeatedly voted against providing foreclosure relief, even for rural
homeowners. He repeatedly voted to terminate emergency loans to homeowners
facing foreclosure, even for veterans and active service members. Duffy voted to
shut down a federal mortgage aid program, even opposing funding for aid for
seniors.
Wisconsin Ranked One of Worst in Nation for Foreclosure Rates
In November 2011, according to analysis by RealtyTrac, Wisconsin was ranked 15th in the nation for
foreclosure rates in October 2011.
One out of every 643 households in Wisconsin received a foreclosure notice during the month. [Associated
Press, 11/10/11]
Voted to Terminate Neighborhood Stabilization Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would require the secretary of
Housing and Urban Development to terminate the Neighborhood Stabilization Program after all funds
obligated for the program have been spent.
It also would rescind all unobligated funds for the program under the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul
law (PL 111-203).
As amended it would require HUD to publish on its website a notice of the termination of the
Neighborhood Stabilization Program within five days of the bill’s enactment.
171
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
It would require that the notice include language directing individuals concerned about the impact of
foreclosures on their community to contact their member of Congress and other locally elected officials.
[CQ Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 31-24. [HR 861, 3/09/11]
… Even Voting Against Providing Foreclosure Relief for Rural Homeowners
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have required states give priority
emphasis and consideration to rural areas when distributing Neighborhood Stabilization Program
funds that were allocated by HUD and appropriated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act.
The motion failed, 153-272. [HR 861, Vote #187, 2/16/11]
Voted to Recommend Termination of Neighborhood Stabilization Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012
budget views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial
Services panel says that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to
impose needed spending discipline.
The committee recommends the termination of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the foreclosure
prevention initiative known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, the Emergency
Homeowner Relief Fund and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. [CQ Committee Meetings,
3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates,
3/15/11]
Voted to Recommend Termination of Neighborhood Stabilization Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language recommending the termination of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) at the
Department of Housing and Urban Development. The amendment would instead voice support for
NSP as “a critical source of funding to reduce the negative and costly effects of foreclosure.” [CQ
Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 21-29. [Ellison Amendment to Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted to Protect Recommendation to Eliminate Neighborhood Stabilization Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language recommending the elimination of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program as well as a
$1 billion rescission of unobligated funds.
172
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The amendment also would add language to note that 99 percent of the funds have been obligated
as of Oct. 1, 2010, and that the committee would review the oversight and administration of the
program to ensure that funds are used in a “prompt and appropriate manner.” [CQ Committee
Meetings, 2/10/11]
The amendment failed, 20-29. [Ellison Amendment to Committee Oversight Plan, 2/10/11]
Voted to Shut Down Emergency Mortgage Relief Program
In 2011, Duffy voted to shut down a program that provided emergency loans to unemployed homeowners
facing foreclosure. The legislation would end the Emergency Homeowner Loan Program and rescind the
unobligated funds.
The White House said it would veto the bill, saying that the program was needed to spur a housing
recovery. The White House argued that that the loan assistance could help as many as 30,000 distressed
homeowners. The CBO estimated that the program would cost $840 million over 10 years. [CQ Today,
3/11/11]
The bill passed, 242-177. [HR 836, Vote #174, 3/11/11]
… Even Voting Against Protecting Veterans and Active Service Members from Foreclosure
Before considering terminating the emergency relief program, Duffy voted against a measure that
would have protected veterans and active service members from foreclosures.
The measure required the Secretary of HUD in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and
Veterans Affairs, to determine the amount necessary to provide assistance under the Emergency
Housing Act of 1975 to homeowners who are veterans or members of the Armed Forces on active
duty. It would also authorize Congress to appropriate this amount of assistance to veterans and
members of the Armed Forces on active duty under the Emergency Mortgage Relief Program.
The motion failed, 182-238. [HR 836, Vote #173, 3/11/11]
Repeatedly Voted for Similar Attempts to Terminate Emergency Loans
The following outlines similar votes to terminate the Emergency Loan program:

In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment
that would allow the secretary of Housing and Urban Development to use up to
$300 million in unobligated funds to provide emergency loans to unemployed
homeowners facing foreclosure. The amendment would allow funds to be used for
loans, whether they were obligated before or after enactment of the bill. The
amendment failed, 22-33. [Frank Amendment to HR 836, 3/03/11; CQ Committee Meetings,
3/03/11]

In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee in favor of a motion to
order previous question (thus ending debate and possibility of amendment) on an
173
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
amendment that would allow the secretary of Housing and Urban Development to
use up to $300 million in unobligated funds to provide emergency loans to
unemployed homeowners facing foreclosure. The amendment would allow funds to
be used for loans obligated before or after enactment of the bill. The motion to
order previous question passed, 33-18. [Bachus Motion on Frank Amendment to HR 836,
3/03/11; CQ Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
Voted Against Funding for Emergency Loans to Homeowners Facing Foreclosure
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would repeal Title I of the
Emergency Housing Act of 1975 as amended by the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL
111-203), which authorized $1 billion for the Department of Housing and Urban Development to
make emergency mortgage relief payments to homeowners facing foreclosure for up to 12 months.
The bill would rescind unobligated funds allocated for the program.
As amended, the bill would direct HUD to study the use of the Emergency Mortgage Relief
Program and identify and apply best practices to other programs that provide housing assistance to
veterans, active duty military personnel and Gold Star Recipients. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 33-22. [HR 836, 3/03/11]
Voted to Shut Down Mortgage Aid Program
In 2011, Duffy voted to shut down a federal program established to help homeowners who owe more than
their homes are worth refinance their loans. A borrower current on his mortgage would qualify for a
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) refinanced loan given that the lender wrote off at least percent of
the unpaid mortgage principal.
The bill rescinded all unobligated funds allocated for the program under the 2008 financial industry
bailout. The House adopted an amendment to direct those funds to be used to pay down the national debt.
Republicans argued that since only $50 million of the $8 billion obligated had been used, the program
was ineffective. Others protested that the program was poorly advertised and had not had a chance to
reach needy homeowners. [Las Vegas Sun, 3/09/11]
The bill passed, 256-171. [HR 830, Vote #171, 3/10/11]
… Even Voting Against Funding Mortgage Aid for Seniors
In March 2011, before considering the mortgage aid program, Duffy voted against a measure that
would have required the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to determine the amount
necessary – and appropriate that amount – to provide assistance under the FHA Refinance
Program to senior homeowners.
The motion failed, 185-243. [HR 830, Vote #170, 3/10/11]
174
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted to Terminate Home Affordable Modification Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would terminate the Making
Home Affordable Program, a foreclosure assistance program aimed at making mortgage payments more
affordable to eligible homeowners.
Specifically, the bill would prohibit the Treasury secretary from providing assistance to homeowners
under the Making Home Affordable Program.
It would allow homeowners currently participating in the program as well as those offered trial or
permanent participation to continue loan payments under those terms.
As amended it would require the Treasury secretary to publish a statement concerning the termination of
the Home Affordable Modification Program on its website within five days of enactment of the bill. The
amendment would require that Treasury post the notice in a prominent location on its website in large
boldface font.
As amended, it would require the statement to read as follows: “The Home Affordable Modification
Program (HAMP) has been terminated. If you are having trouble paying your mortgage and need help
contacting your lender or servicer for purpose of negotiating or acquiring a loan modification, please
contact your Member of Congress to assist you in contacting your lender or servicer for the purpose of
negotiating or acquiring a loan modification.” [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 32-23. [HR 839, 3/09/11]
Voted to Recommend Termination of Home Affordable Modification Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012
budget views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial
Services panel says that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to
impose needed spending discipline.
The committee recommends the termination of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the foreclosure
prevention initiative known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, the Emergency
Homeowner Relief Fund and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. [CQ Committee Meetings,
3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates,
3/15/11]
Voted Against Postponing Termination of Affordable Modification Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would
postpone termination of the Home Affordable Modification Program until an additional 500,000
mortgages have been modified under the program. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
175
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The amendment failed, 23-32. [Maloney Amendment to HR 839, 3/09/11]
Voted Against Providing Assistance to Homeowners Who Requested Loan Modifications
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would allow
the Treasury secretary to provide assistance under the Home Affordable Modification Program to
homeowners who have requested loan modifications through their servicer by March 1, 2011. [CQ
Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
The amendment failed, 24-31. [McCarthy Amendment to HR 839, 3/09/11]
Voted to Recommend Termination of Emergency Homeowner Relief Fund
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee recommends the termination of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the foreclosure
prevention initiative known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, the Emergency Homeowner
Relief Fund and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted to Protect Recommendation to Eliminate Sustainable Communities Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would replace
language recommending the elimination of the Sustainable Communities Program with language calling
for a committee review of its effectiveness in creating “more efficient and well connected” communities.
[CQ Committee Meetings, 2/10/11]
The amendment failed, 23-30. [Perlmutter Amendment to Committee Oversight Plan, 2/10/11]
Voted to Protect Recommendation to Cut Funding for Emergency Homeowner Relief Fund
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language from the oversight plan recommending the rescission of unexpended and unobligated funds for
the Emergency Homeowner Relief Fund.
It also would strike language stating that loans made to borrowers under the fund provide no benefit to
borrowers and that the loans are unlikely to be repaid. [CQ Committee Meetings, 2/10/11]
The amendment failed, 23-31. [Waters Amendment to Committee Oversight Plan, 2/10/11]
Voted Against Studying Impact of Cutting Neighborhood Stabilization Program Funding on Jobs
176
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require the
secretary of Housing and Urban Development to determine the approximate number of jobs that will be
lost in each member of Congress’ district by rescinding the funding allocated for the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program.
The amendment also would require the HUD secretary to notify grantees that received or were scheduled
to receive funding that the program has been terminated and the number of jobs that would be lost within
30 days.
It also would require HUD to provide grantees the name and contact information of the member of
Congress that represents its district and that they should contact that member directly for assistance in
mitigating foreclosed properties. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
The amendment failed, 21-26. [Waters Amendment to HR 861, 3/09/11]
Voted Against Studying Impact of Terminating Neighborhood Stabilization Program on Homeless
Veterans
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require the
secretary of Housing and Urban Development to study the impact of terminating the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program on homeless veterans. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/09/11]
The amendment failed, 24-31. [Green Amendment to HR 861, 3/09/11]
Voted Against Studying Cost of Providing Loan Modifications to Veterans and Armed Forces
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to substitute an amendment that would direct
the Treasury secretary to consult with the Veterans Affairs Department to determine the cost of providing
loan modifications to veterans and armed forces personnel.
The substitute amendment would direct the Treasury secretary to study the use of the Home Affordable
Modification Program and identify and apply best practices to other programs that provide housing
assistance to veterans, active duty military personnel and Gold Star Recipients. [CQ Committee Meetings,
3/09/11]
The substitute amendment passed, 32-24. [Grimm Substitute Amendment to HR 839, 3/09/11]
Voted Against Providing New Mortgages Under Federal Housing Administration Refinance
Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would prohibit the secretary of
Housing and Urban Development from insuring any new mortgages under the Federal Housing
Administration Refinance Program, except for insurance commitments entered into before enactment of
the bill.
177
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The bill would void Housing and Urban Development Mortgagee Letter 2010-23, which provides
guidance for lenders regarding the requirements and administration of enhancements to the Federal
Housing Administration’s Refinance Program.
It also would bar the HUD secretary from issuing any regulation, order, notice or mortgagee letter based
on or substantially similar to Mortgagee Letter 2010-23.
The bill would rescind all unobligated stimulus funds under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
(PL 110-343) allocated for the FHA Refinance Program.
Funds made available for the program, but expended before the date of the enactment would continue to
be governed by the mortgagee letter.
As amended, the bill would direct HUD to study the use of the Federal Housing Administration Refinance
Program and identify and apply best practices to other programs that provide housing assistance to
veterans, active duty military personnel and Gold Star Recipients. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 33-22. [HR 830, 3/03/11]
Voted Against Supporting National Housing Trust Fund
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would revise
language on the National Housing Trust Fund to voice support for the low-income rental assistance fund
as “a permanent source of funding for affordable housing.”
It also would support continue monitoring of the fund and the consideration of legislation to provide it
dedicated funding. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The amendment was rejected, 22-30. [Moore Amendment to Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted to Oppose Funding Certain New Government Housing Programs
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee suggests the administration should refrain from funding certain new government housing
programs at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In addition, it voices concern
over the increasing discretionary spending in HUD’s budget and plans to review HUD programs that
overlap with those of other agencies. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted Against Studying Cost of Providing Loan Modifications to Veterans and Members of Armed
Forces
178
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to substitute an amendment that would
authorize the HUD secretary to consult with the Pentagon and Veterans Affairs Department to determine
the cost of providing loan modifications to veterans and other armed forces personnel.
The substitute amendment would direct the secretary of Housing and Urban Development to study the use
of the Emergency Mortgage Relief Program and identify and apply best practices to other programs that
provide housing assistance to veterans, active duty military personnel and Gold Star Recipients. [CQ
Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
The substitute amendment passed, 33-22. [Grimm Substitute Amendment to HR 836, 3/03/11]
Voted Against Postponing Termination of Federal Housing Administration Refinance Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would postpone
termination of the Federal Housing Administration Refinance Program until more than 500,000
mortgages have been insured. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
The amendment failed, 22-33. [Maloney Amendment to HR 830, 3/03/11]
Voted Against Guidance for Lenders Regarding the Federal Housing Administration’s Refinance
Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would strike
language in the bill to void Housing and Urban Development Mortgagee Letter 2010-23, which provides
guidance for lenders regarding the requirements and administration of enhancements to the Federal
Housing Administration’s Refinance Program. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/03/11]
The amendment failed, 22-33. [Lynch Amendment to HR 830, 3/03/11]
Voted to Recommend that OMB Be Required to Move Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “On Budget”
And Account For Their Losses
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee recommends that the Office of Management and Budget be statutorily required to move
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “on budget” and to account for the losses Fannie and Freddie have sustained
since they were placed in conservatorship in the same way as the Congressional Budget Office calculates
those losses. It also recommends subjecting Fannie’s and Freddie’s debt - used to finance their mortgage
purchases - to the statutory debt limit. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
179
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted to Recommend Subjecting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s Debt to Statutory Debt Limit
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
The committee recommends that the Office of Management and Budget be statutorily required to move
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “on budget” and to account for the losses Fannie and Freddie have sustained
since they were placed in conservatorship in the same way as the Congressional Budget Office calculates
those losses. It also recommends subjecting Fannie’s and Freddie’s debt - used to finance their mortgage
purchases - to the statutory debt limit. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
180
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Financial Reform Issues – Wall Street Oversight
Significant Findings
 Voted to delay effective date of derivatives provisions part of regulatory
overhaul
 Voted against holding credit rating agencies liable for misstatements and
omissions
 Voted against prohibiting regulators from approving risky bond programs
 Repeatedly voted to limit SEC funding
 Voted to oppose requested increases in SEC personnel and funding
 Voted against requiring companies to disclose employees’ median
compensation
Duffy repeatedly voted to stymie efforts to regulate Wall Street in the wake of the
2008 economic crash. He voted to delay the effective date of derivatives provisions as
part of regulatory overhaul, voted against holding credit rating agencies liable for
misstatements and omissions, and voted against prohibiting regulators from
approving risky bond programs. Duffy repeatedly voted to limit SEC funding and
voted to oppose requested increases in SEC personnel and funding. He also voted
against requiring companies to disclose employees’ median compensation.
Voted To Delay The Effective Date Of Most Derivatives Market Provisions in 2010 Financial
Regulatory Overhaul
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would delay the effective date of
most derivatives market provisions of the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul (PL 111-203) from July
2011 until Sept. 30 2012.
Specifically, the law’s Title VII provisions, and their corresponding regulations, would become effective
on the latest of:



Sept. 30, 2012.
Ninety days after the publication of the relevant final rule or regulation in the Federal Register, or
a later date specified in the rule.
The effective date otherwise applicable to the provisions.
181
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Title VII covers some of the activities of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which
regulates financial aspects of commodities trading.
The bill would exempt from the new effective date provisions calling for the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and the CFTC to define a swap dealer, a major swap participant and its security-based
counterpart, an eligible contract participant and a security-based swap agreement.
As amended it also would exempt provisions requiring security-based swaps to be cleared from the bill’s
deadline extension regarding derivatives regulation. It also would allow the SEC and the CFTC to
proceed with any actions to address speculative trading as scheduled by the law.
The bill would direct the CFTC and the SEC to solicit public comment regarding the time and resources
that would be required of affected parties in order to develop systems and infrastructure necessary to
comply with any regulations, as well as any alternative approaches to accomplish the objectives of such
regulations. The agencies would have to take the comments into account when performing the costbenefit analysis of the regulations and when determining their effective dates.
It would grant the CFTC and the SEC the authority to exempt persons or entities from registration and
related regulatory requirements if the entity is subject to comprehensive regulation by another agency or,
if a foreign-based entity, the appropriate regulatory authority in their home country.
As amended, it also would exempt provisions prohibiting the federal bailout of swap participants from the
bill’s deadline extension regarding derivatives regulation.
As amended the bill would clarify that the CFTC and SEC may only exempt entities from the registration
and regulatory requirements outlined by the financial overhaul law.
Additionally, there would have to be an adequate information-sharing arrangement between the CFTC or
the SEC and that regulatory authority, and the exemption would have to be consistent with the public
interest.
The measure also would allow the agencies to condition any exemptions they move to grant on the
entity’s compliance with the other regulatory regime. Should any noncompliance with that regime occur,
the CFTC and the SEC would have the authority to treat it as a violation of the relevant provisions of the
financial regulatory overhaul law, which would trigger any corresponding enforcement actions.
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, as amended, 30-24. [HR 1573, 5/24/11]
Voted Against Holding Credit Rating Agencies Liable for Misstatements and Omissions
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would repeal a provision of the
2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203) that makes credit rating agencies liable if their
ratings of asset-backed securities included in public offering documents filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission contain material misstatements or omissions. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 7/20/11]
182
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 31-19. [HR 1539, 7/20/11]
Voted Against Prohibiting Regulators From Approving Risky Covered Bond Programs
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would prohibit a
regulator from approving a covered bond program unless it determines that it would not increase the risk
of or actual losses to the FDIC’s insurance fund.
It also would have required covered bond regulators to notify the Financial Institutions Examination
Council of approved covered bond programs.
It also would specify that over-collateralization requirements jointly established by covered bond
regulators must ensure that sufficient assets are maintained in the cover pool to satisfy all principal and
interest payments on the covered bonds through maturity and must be based on credit, collection and
interest rate risks associated with the asset class.
It would require covered bonds issuers to submit monthly reports to its regulator, trustees, bondholders
and asset monitors on whether the cover pool meets the applicable minimum over-collaterization
requirements. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 26-28. [Covered Bond Program Requirement Amendment to HR 940, 6/22/11]
Voted to Limit SEC Funding Until SEC Optimized Resources Already Available
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
Those views and estimates included the statement that the committee will only consider additional
funding for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after the commission has optimized its
available resources by implementing initiatives recommended in a recently completed study that was
authorized by the financial overhaul measure (PL 111-203). [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
… Then Voted Again to Limit SEC Funding
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for an amendment that would state that
the committee will only consider additional funding for the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) after the commission has optimized its available resources by implementing initiatives
recommended in a recently completed study that was authorized by the financial overhaul measure
(PL 111-203).
183
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
This amendment would amend an underlying amendment that would recommend SEC funding to
support additional staffing and technology investments needed to meet pre-existing
responsibilities and those imposed by the overhaul law. [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The amendment to the underlying amendment was adopted, 25-18. [Garrett Amendment to Frank
Amendment to Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted to Oppose Requested Increases in SEC Personnel and Funding
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to approve the committee’s fiscal 2012 budget
views and estimates for submission to the House Budget Committee. The Financial Services panel says
that it cannot support the administration’s budget proposal, because it fails to impose needed spending
discipline.
With regard to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the panel opposes requested increases in
personnel and funding until the SEC has shown “concrete progress in correcting past failures and
implementing clear and verifiable plans for fulfilling the additional responsibilities the commission has
been granted.” [CQ Committee Meetings, 3/15/11]
The budget views and estimates were approved as amended, 29-25. [Budget Views and Estimates, 3/15/11]
Voted Against Requiring Companies to Disclose Employees’ Median Compensation
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would replace the
language in the bill to repeal current law requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their employees’
median compensation separately from CEO pay packages with language to require companies to calculate
their employees’ median compensation using the cash compensation of domestic employees, and report
that information annually. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 25-27. [Compensation Disclosure Amendment to HR 1062, 6/22/11]
… And Voted Again Against Requiring Companies to Disclose Employees’ Median
Compensation
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee for a bill that would repeal a provision
of the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul law (PL 111-203) that would require publicly traded
companies to disclose their employees’ median compensation separate from CEO pay packages. It
would void any regulations made to require such compensation disclosure. [CQ Markup & Vote
Coverage, 6/22/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House, 33-21. [HR 1062, 6/22/11]
Accused Dodd-Frank Financial Reform of Failing to Reform Wall Street
In 2011, Duffy accused Dodd-Frank financial reform of failing to reform Wall Street.
184
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“It was one year ago today that President Obama signed the so-called ‘Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.’ Like other signature pieces of legislation of this administration,
the name can be misleading. Like the so-called ‘stimulus’ that stimulated nothing but more government
debt, this bill fails to actually reform Wall Street or protect consumers, which is a remarkable
accomplishment, considering it was more than 2,300 pages long and contained more than 400 regulations
and mandates,” Duffy wrote. [Duffy op-ed, Washington Times, 7/21/11]
Sad New Rules Would Require Over 2.2 Million in Labor Hours for Compliance
In 2011, Duffy claimed that the new rules under Dodd-Frank financial reform would “require an
estimated 2,260,631 labor hours just for compliance.” [Duffy op-ed, Washington Times, 7/21/11]
… Which A Fact Check Group Called “Mostly False”
In 2011, fact check group PolitiFact Wisconsin found that Duffy’s claim regarding labor
hours was “mostly false.”
“But in dramatizing the burden, he misapplies a very precise number to one subset of the
many institutions that will be affected by the law. No one knows how many of those hours
will land on the small players,” they wrote.
“At the same time, he potentially underestimates the burden, attributing the paperwork
load of the first batch of rules to the as-yet-uncalculated burden from the hundreds of rules
to come.” [politifact.com, 7/20/11]
Voted Against Requiring SEC To Determine If Exempting An Entity Would Be Consistent With
Consumer Protections
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require the
Securities and Exchange Commission to determine that exempting an entity from registration or other
regulatory requirements would be consistent with the protection of consumers of financial products.
It also would require the SEC to publish in the Federal Register a notice that its determination to grant an
exemption from registration and regulatory requirements does not increase systemic risk to the economy
or unduly impact investors small businesses or consumers.
The amendment was rejected, 24-30. [Velazquez Amendment Regarding Regulatory Exemptions to HR 1573, 5/24/11]
Voted Against Requiring Registration for Companies with More Than 500 Unaccredited Investors
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would require
Securities and Exchange Commission registration for companies who have more than 500 investors who
are not accredited, as defined by the SEC. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 10/26/11]
The amendment was rejected, 23-33. [Miller Amendment regarding SEC registration to HR 2167, 10/26/11]
185
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted Against Exempting Certain Small Businesses from SEC Regulation
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment to the Schweikert, RAriz., amendment that would require the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue a rule or
regulation that would exempt from SEC registration, small business investment companies that offer
securities. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 24-27. [Small Business Investment Company Amendment to HR 1070, 6/22/11]
Voted Against Allowing FDIC To Act As Receiver of Covered Bond Issuer In Default
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee against an amendment that would allow the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to act as the receiver of a covered bond issuer in default and take
action to dissolve the estate created once the bond issuer goes into conservatorship, receivership,
liquidation or bankruptcy.
It would allow the FDIC to recover through assessments an amount equal to the losses because of the
default of a covered bond program. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage, 6/22/11]
The amendment was rejected, 26-28. [Covered Bond Amendment to HR 940, 6/22/11]
Called for “Easing the Regulatory Burden”
According to his 2012 campaign website, Duffy called for “easing the regulatory burden.”
“By easing the regulatory burden, while still protecting consumers and the environment, we can reduce
the bureaucratic red tape that slows growth. By cutting taxes on families and small businesses, we can
reduce their costs and help jumpstart our economy,” he said. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 10/21/11]
Made It Priority to Speak Up for “Main Street” Community Banks and Credit Unions
In 2011, Duffy said he made it a priority to “speak up for the community banks and credit unions that are
on Main Street, not Wall Street.” [Duffy op-ed, Washington Times, 7/21/11]
Wanted Cost-Benefit Analysis for Any Regulation Before Implementation
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted a cost-benefit analysis of any regulation before its
implementation. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Voted To Establish Covered Bond Regulatory Oversight Program
In 2011, Duffy voted in the Financial Services Committee to require the Treasury secretary in
consultation with covered bond regulators to establish a covered bond regulatory oversight program
within 180 days of the bill’s enactment.
186
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The oversight program would allow for evaluation of a covered bonds program, including the
establishment of additional eligibility requirements.
It would allow a covered bond regulator to approve existing covered bond programs.
It would allow an issuer to have more than one covered bond program.
It would require the Treasury secretary to maintain and publish on the Internet a registry of approved
covered bond programs that details the name of the covered bond program, the name of the eligible issuer
and any other information the secretary deems necessary to identify the issuer and program.
It would allow a covered bond regulator to assess fees on issuers to defray oversight costs.
It would require the Treasury secretary in consultation with covered bond regulators to establish minimum
over-collateralization requirements for covered bonds backed by each of the eligible asset classes.
The bill would require covered bond issuers to report monthly to the Treasury secretary, the covered bond
regulator, covered bond holders as well as an independent asset monitor on whether the coverage pool
that secures the covered bonds meets the applicable minimum over-collateralization requirements.
Under the bill bond pools that fail to meet minimum over-collateralization requirements would be
considered uncured defaults.
It would require the covered bond issuer to provide written notice to the Treasury secretary and applicable
regulator if the covered bond pool securing the covered bonds fails to meet the applicable minimum overcollateralization requirements.
As amended it would clarify that the regulator for the sponsor of the largest share of the covered bond
pool would serve as the regulator for a covered bond issuer that is not regulated by a federal banking
agency.
It would designate the Treasury secretary as the regulator for any other covered bond issuer not regulated
by a federal banking agency.
It would require regulators to take into account safety and soundness factors in evaluating a covered bond
program for approval.
It would allow a covered bond regulator to direct an issuer to stop issuing covered bonds if the issuer does
not remedy deficiencies identified by the regulator.
It would allow covered bond regulators to adopt separate registration, disclosure and exemption rules for
covered bond programs.
It also would clarify that an asset must have been in compliance with federal agency rules at the time of
origination in order to be eligible for a covered bond pool.
187
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
It would clarify that a disqualified asset may remain in the covered bond pool until removed by its issuer
and that covered bond pools may only contain assets from one eligible asset class.
It would clarify that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may recover losses after consulting with
the Treasury secretary.
As amended it would give the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation acting as the conservator or receiver
of a covered bond issuer in default one year, rather than 180 days, to transfer a covered bond pool to
another eligible issuer.
As amended it would allow the covered bond regulator to set a cap on the outstanding covered bonds that
an entity may issue. It would allow the regulator to review the cap quarterly to make changes. It also
would require the covered bonds regulators to report to Congress annually on the state of the covered
bond market.
As amended it would clarify that only non-banks that are supervised by the Federal Reserve are eligible to
issue covered bonds.
It also would clarify that nothing in the bill shall affect the legal rights of lien holders.
It also would require rather than allow covered bond regulators to adopt disclosure and reporting
regulations for offers or sales of covered bonds by a bank or an eligible issuer. [CQ Markup & Vote Coverage,
6/22/11]
The bill was ordered reported favorably to the full House (as amended), 44-7. [HR 940, 6/22/11]
Voted Against Forcing Big Banks to Pay For Their Own Bailouts
On April 18, 2012, Republicans on the Financial Service Committee voted against an amendment that
would have forced banks with over $50 billion in assets to pay for any future bank bailouts by the
government. [Amendment #2, Record Vote No. FC-70; Reuters, 4/18/12]
188
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Foreign Policy Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted against authorizing action in Libya
 Wanted to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by 2014
Duffy voted against authorizing President Obama to wage war in Libya, and wanted
to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by 2014.
Voted Against Authorizing Action in Libya
In 2011, Duffy voted against authoring President Obama to wage war in Libya. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
6/25/11]
NOTE: Several Democrats, including Wisconsin Representatives Tammy Baldwin and Gwen Moore,
voted against authorization as well.
Wanted to Withdraw Troops from Afghanistan by 2014
In 2011, Duffy said that he wanted to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan that year and to be
finished as planned by 2014. [Superior Telegram, 5/05/11]
189
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Gay and Lesbian Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted to ban same sex marriage
 Endorsed by anti-gay marriage advocate Julaine Appling
Duffy voted to ban same sex marriage, and supported a constitutional ban on the
same. He was also endorsed by anti-gay marriage advocate Julaine Appling, who
led Wisconsin’s referendum to ban same sex marriage.
Supported Constitutional Ban on Same Sex Marriage
In 2010, Duffy supported a constitutional ban on same sex marriage. [Associated Press, 9/09/10]
Voted to Ban Same Sex Marriage
In 2006, Duffy voted for the Wisconsin constitutional amendment that would define marriage between a
man and a woman. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
… After Appearing in Parody Movie About Gay Couple Getting Married
Duffy appeared on a parody movie about a gay couple getting married, called “The Wedding
Video.” [Associated Press, 9/09/10]
Opposed Civil Unions Resembling Marriage
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed civil unions that resembled a marriage.
“I voted for the 2006 Wisconsin amendment defining marriage between a man and woman and I
do not favor any government-sanctioned union/arrangement that looks like traditional marriage,”
he said. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Endorsed by Julaine Appling
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by Wisconsin anti-gay marriage advocate Julaine Appling.
Appling had led the 2006 campaign for the referendum that rewrote Wisconsin’s constitution to ban same
sex marriage. [Associated Press, 9/09/10]
190
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Gun Issues
Significant Findings
 Criticized state legislator for flip-flopping on concealed weapon ban
Duffy criticized a state legislator for flip-flopping on a ban on concealed weapons.
Criticized State Legislator for Flip-Flopping on Ban on Concealed Weapons
In 2004, Duffy criticized state representative Gary Sherman for flip-flopping on a ban on concealed
weapons.
“It’s a perfect example of why people have become so disillusioned with politics and with politicians,”
Duffy said. [Wisconsin State Journal, 2/06/04]
Said Hunting and Gun-Ownership Was Part of Wisconsin “Way of Life”
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy said that hunting and gun-ownership was part of the Wisconsin
“way of life.” [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
191
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Health Care Issues
Significant Findings
 Promised alternative health care reform proposal… then proposed one nearly
a year later
 Had reservations about keeping children on parents’ health care until age 26
 Voted for straight repeal health care reform… after saying he would not
Duffy has struggled to articulate his position on health care reform. After breaking
his pledge not to vote for straight repeal of health care reform, Duffy voted for
straight repeal, promising an alternative proposal for reform. He made that
promise in January 2011, and then introduced the alternative in December that
year. Duffy also expressed reservations about keeping children on their parents’
health care plans until age 26.
Promised Alternative Health Care Reform Plan
In January 2011, Duffy promised that he would propose his own legislation as an alternative to the health
care law passed the previous year. [Appleton Post Crescent, 10/10/11; Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/19/11]
… But Seasons Went By Without Plan
In 2011, Duffy initially promised a health care replacement measure that spring. But when that did
not happen, Duffy promised a replacement that summer. By October 2011, Duffy still had not
shared a replacement plan.
“I was under the impression they were going to bring out a replacement,” Duffy explained.
[Appleton Post Crescent, 10/10/11]
NOTE: As of the time of this research project, November 2011, Duffy had still not proposed a
health care reform alternative.
Introduced Plan At Very End of The Year
In December 2011, a week before going home for the holidays, Duffy introduced a bill that would
redo the health care reform law.
“Duffy's measure, a composite of ideas — some are borrowed, some his own — has little chance
of becoming law,” the Green Bay Press Gazette reported. [Green Bay Press Gazette, 12/25/11]
192
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Said His Plan Would Include “Portability” and “Transparency”
In October 2011, Duffy stated that his alternative health care plan would include
“portability” and “transparency”.
“It’ll be a lot of what we talked about on the campaign — portability, transparency,
expanding health savings accounts,” he said. [Appleton Post Crescent, 10/10/11]
Had Reservations About Keeping Children on Parents’ Health Care Until Age 26
In 2011, Duffy expressed reservations about keeping children on their parents’ health care until age 26.
“I’d want to see some more information on that ... I want to make sure it works,” he said. [Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel, 1/19/11]
Flip-Flopped on Straight Repeal of Health Care Reform
Between 2010 and 2011, Duffy flip-flopped on supporting a straight repeal of health care reform.
FLIP: Supported Repeal and Replace
In 2011, Duffy supported a repeal and replace strategy for health care reform.
“So I would support either reforming the reform, or if we had a bill that was going to work, repeal
and replace,” he said. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/25/11]
FLIP: Said He Opposed “A Straight Repeal”
In 2011, Duffy said he opposed “a straight repeal” of the health care law without an alternative
measure.
“I can’t support a straight repeal. I didn’t run on that,” he said. [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/20/11]
FLOP: Voted for Straight Repeal of Health Care Reform
In 2011, Duffy voted for a straight repeal of health care reform, with no alternatives in place.
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/25/11]
Fact Check Group Said Duffy Made “Full Flop” By Voting to Repeal Health Care
Law
In 2011, fact check group PolitiFact Wisconsin found that Duffy made a “full flop” by
voting to repeal the health care law, when he had previously stated he would only support
repeal with an alternative to consider.
193
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“He voted for the repeal, without a new proposal in place. Indeed, no such bill exists yet.
It’s unclear what will be in a Republican alternative, when it will be voted on, and whether
it will satisfy Duffy’s interest in saving the “good things” in the legislation,” the group
stated. [politifact.com, 1/19/11]
Criticized by Wausau Daily Herald for Change In Position
In 2011, Duffy was criticized by the Wausau Daily Herald for changing his position on
health care repeal, supporting repeal without an alternative to consider.
Duffy’s spokesperson disputed that claim, saying Duffy was “very consistent that he
wanted to repeal and replace” and that “you can’t replace until there has been a repeal.”
[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/19/11]
Duffy Said He Wanted Bipartisan Input into Alternative Healthcare Bill
Defending his vote, Duffy said he wanted bipartisan input into an alternative healthcare
bill.
“Some have criticized my vote as a contradiction of what I campaigned on because an
alternative measure was not immediately in place. However, if Republicans in the House
simply repealed PPACA and inserted a purely Republican alternative, we would have been
guilty of imposing the same kind of one-party solution that we have been decrying. With
the “repeal” portion over and the process of “replace” beginning, we have an opportunity
to build commonsense, bipartisan reform that will truly bring costs down and increase
access,” he explained. [Sawyer County Record, 1/26/11]
Voted to Repeal Health Care, Put Insurance Industry in Charge of Americans’ Health
In 2011, Duffy voted to repeal the historic health care reform bill passed the previous year.
“If we repeal health reform there will be no prohibition on discrimination against over 100 million
Americans with pre-existing conditions, no prohibition on insurance companies canceling your coverage
when you get sick, no prohibition on lifetime caps and annual limits, no required coverage for young
adults on their parents’ policy,” said Rep. Henry Waxman. [CQ Today, 1/19/11]
The American Medical Association and the AARP both opposed repealing the health care law. Out of
several industry groups, only the U.S. Chamber of Commerce supported the repeal bill. [The Hill, 1/19/11]
The bill passed, 245-189. [HR 2, Vote #14, 1/19/11]
… Despite the Effect Repeal Would Have on 7th Congressional District
According to 2011 analysis by the minority staff of the Energy and Commerce Committee, the
Affordable Care Act provided significant benefits to Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District:
194
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012








Allowing insurance companies to deny coverage to 119,000 to 299,000 individuals,
including 8,000 to 35,000 children, with pre-existing conditions.
Rescinding consumer protections for 427,000 individuals who have health insurance
through their employer or the market for private insurance.
Eliminating health care tax credits for up to 17,000 small businesses and 197,000 families.
Increasing prescription drug costs for 9,800 seniors who hit the Part D drug “donut hole”
and denying new preventive care benefits to 125,000 seniors.
Increasing the costs of early retiree coverage for up to 9,600 early retirees.
Eliminating new health care coverage options for 1,700 uninsured young adults.
Increasing the number of people without health insurance by 23,000 individuals.
Increasing the costs to hospitals of providing uncompensated care by $75 million annually
[“New District by District and Metro Area Analyses of the Impact of Repealing Health Reform”,
Minority Staff of Energy and Commerce Committee, 1/18/11]
… Though Repeal Jeopardizes Children, Pregnant Women, and Cancer Survivors
If Duffy gets his way, insurance companies could deny coverage to children with pre-existing
conditions, pregnant women and breast cancer survivors.
Repealing Health Care Reform Would Re-Legalize Allowing Insurance Companies to
Drop Coverage for People with Pre-Existing Conditions
In March 2010, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that six months after the Health Care
Legislation is signed, health plans would be prohibited from excluding children who have
preexisting conditions. In 2014, this prohibition would be extended to adults. That year,
insurers would no longer be allowed to set annual limits, rescind coverage, or impose
excessive waiting periods before coverage starts. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 3/22/10]
… Including Children
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, six months after health care legislation was
signed, health plans would be prohibited from excluding children who have
preexisting conditions. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 3/22/10]
… Including Pregnant Women
According to PolitiFact.com, pregnancy was considered a pre-existing condition.
“But for now, Rohack is correct that pregnancy is considered a pre-existing
condition and prevents many women from getting coverage if they seek insurance
on the individual market,” the website explained. [politifact.com, 8/18/09]
… Including Breast Cancer Survivors
According to PolitiFact.com, cancer was considered a pre-existing condition.
[politifact.com, 8/18/09]
195
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
And according to U.S. News, breast cancer was specifically considered a preexisting condition.
“Starting in 2014, insurers won’t be able to deny applicants based on, say, an
earlier diagnosis of breast cancer,” the story reported. [usnews.com, 1/14/11]
… Though Repeal Would Make Millions of Seniors Pay More for Prescription Drugs
If Duffy gets his way, millions of seniors would pay more for prescription drugs.
Repealing Legislation Would Re-Enact the Donut Hole for Seniors
In March 2010, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Medicare seniors with Medicare
prescription coverage prior to the signing of the Health Care Legislation must pay out of
their pocket for drug spending that falls between $2,830 and $6,440 because of the
“doughnut hole” in the Medicare law.
Seniors who hit this “idiosyncratic feature” this in 2010 would get a $250 rebate. In 2011,
the gap would be reduced through a discount on brand-name drugs. By 2020, it should be
eliminated, although seniors would still have to pay 25 percent of their prescription-drug
costs. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 3/22/10]
… Which Involved About 4 Million Seniors
As of June 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services estimated that
approximately 4 million seniors would get the 2010 rebates for falling into the
doughnut hole. [cnn.com, 6/07/10]
… Though Repeal Would Lose Tax Breaks for Small Businesses
If Duffy gets his way, small businesses would lose tax breaks that help make health insurance
more affordable.
Repealing Legislation Would Eliminate Tax Breaks for Small Businesses
Businesses with fewer than 25 Employees and average wages of less than $50,000 could
qualify for a tax credit of up to 35 percent of the cost of the premiums. [MSNBC, 3/22/10]
… Though Repeal Would Prevent Young People From Staying on Parents’ Plans
If Duffy gets his way, young people would not be able to stay on their parents’ plans until age 26.
Repealing Healthcare Reform Would Prevent Dependent Children from Staying of
Parents’ Plans Until Age 26
196
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to 2010 analysis by Kaiser Health News, under healthcare reform, dependent children
could remain on their parents’ health insurance plans until age 26. [msnbc.com, 3/22/10]
… Though Repealing Health Care Could Eliminate Up to 400,000 Jobs
According to the Center for American Progress, the repeal of health insurance reform could
eliminate 250,000 to 400,000 jobs annually over the next ten years. [Center for American Progress,
1/07/11]
… Though Repeal Would Add $230 Billion to the Deficit
According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the repeal of health care reform would
increase the deficit by $230 billion by 2021. The CBO’s previous score of the Affordable Health
Care Act had it decreasing the deficit by $143 billion over 10 years. [Politico, 1/06/11]
Harold Times Reporter: Duffy “Reneged on a Campaign Promise”
“In voting to repeal what Republicans derisively label "Obamacare" in January, Duffy reneged on a
campaign pledge that he would only vote to repeal the health care reform law if there was something on
the table to replace it.” [Herald Times Reporter, 10/05/11]
Claimed He Was Working on His Own Proposal
In October 2011, Duffy said he was working on his own health care replacement bill after
Republicans failed to address the issue. He offered no timetable for his legislation other than
“soon.”
He said, "I was under the impression they were going to bring out a replacement. What I've been
working on is a proposal of our own to start the discussion." [Herald Times Reporter, 10/05/11]
Wausau Daily Herald: Duffy Faces Political Test on Health Repeal
In a January 2011 editorial, the Wausau Daily Herald said it makes the most sense to “reform the reform”
and said the newspaper endorses “legislative efforts to improve or add to the reform that was
accomplished.”
The newspaper wrote of Duffy’s involvement in the repeal and replace effort: “During the campaign,
Duffy very specifically discussed this issue as an area where the best solution is not flat repeal but a more
careful, more nuanced approach. If Duffy votes for repeal, we hope he will explain clearly to constituents
his reasoning, and why he changed his mind since the election. We deserve an open discussion of the
issue.” [Wausau Daily Herald, 1/17/11]
Allowed Repealing Health Care While Keeping Benefits for Members of Congress
In January 2011, Duffy voted against a motion that would not allow Congress to repeal the health reform
bill without a majority of members of the House and Senate agreeing to forgo federal benefits themselves.
197
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The motion to recommit instructed the repeal bill to be sent back to three committees and altered to
require a majority of House and Senate members to give up federal health care benefits before repeal
could take place.
“Congress should live by the same rule it imposes on everyone else,” said Rep. Robert Andrews. “There
are serious consequences of this bill and we believe that repealing it is unfair and just plain wrong. It
would even be more wrong for those who support the repeal to live by a different standard.” [The Hill,
1/19/11]
The bill failed, 185-245. [H.R. 2, Vote #13, 1/19/11]
Admitted Repeal Vote Was Wrong without a Replacement Plan
In a February 2011 interview, Duffy said that he was skeptical of the repeal vote at first but, after being
assured by GOP leadership that the law’s provisions would be replaced, he voted in favor of repeal on that
condition. Duffy said, “I don't believe that we should ... just do a straight-up repeal. My position during
the campaign and today is, let's reform the reform or repeal and replace. And so, I wasn't gonna vote for
it. But I went and spoke to the leadership, and I got a commitment that we were going to bring forward
our ideas on this replacement bill.” [Washington Post Blog, 2/07/11]
Introduced Health Care Replacement Bill in Dec. 2011
In December 2011, Duffy introduced legislation to “replace” the health care reform law. The legislation is
“a composite of ideas –some are borrowed, some his own.” [Green Bay Press Gazette, 12/25/11; Rep. Sean Duffy
Press Release, 12/15/11]
Green Bay Press Gazette: Bill Has “Little Chance of Becoming Law”
The Green Bay Press Gazette noted that the legislation “has little chance of becoming law.” [Green
Bay Press Gazette, 12/25/11]
Voted to Keep Federal Health Care Benefits a Secret
In January 2011, Duffy voted against requiring the disclosure of whether Members were enrolling in the
Federal Employees Health Benefits program.
The bill failed, 238-191. [H Res 5, Vote #5, 1/05/11]
Advocated for Reducing the Age Children May Remain on Their Parent’ Insurance from 26 to 23
In January 2012, Duffy said he would like to reduce the age through which children may remain on their
parents’ health insurance from 26 to 23. [Rivertowns.net, 2/1/12]
Touted His Own Healthcare Plan
In a March 2012 column, Duffy criticized Obamacare, and touted his own healthcare plan.
198
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Duffy said “I believe we can make health care affordable again by using market reforms: allowing people
to purchase health insurance across state lines; ending junk lawsuits; allowing small businesses to pool
together to offer health insurance; and empowering patients with meaningful data on cost and quality so
they are better equipped to make good decisions about their health care.”
Like Obamacare, Duffy’s plan “also covers individuals with pre-existing medical conditions.” [Wausau
Daily Herald, 3/21/12]
Voted to Cut Off Funding to Implement Health Care Reform Law
In 2011, Duffy voted to bar the use of funds to carry out the provisions of the 2010 health care reform bill
and its reconciliation measures, or any amendment made by those laws.
The amendment was adopted, 241-187. [HR 1, King amendment #267, Vote #98, 2/18/11]
Duffy also voted to prohibit the use of funds to pay the salary of any officer or employee of the federal
government to implement the provisions of the health care reform bill. That amendment was adopted,
237-191. [HR 1, King amendment #268, Vote #99, 2/18/11]
Said Health Care Reform Cost Americans Freedom
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy claimed that health care reform cost Americans freedom.
“The recent passage of health care legislation will come not only at a significant cost to taxpayers’
finances, but to our freedom,” he said. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
199
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Labor and Working Family Issues
Significant Findings
 Refused to comment on Governor Walker’s labor “reform” bill
 Former chief of staff runs Wisconsin arm of Americans for Progress
Though Duffy not commented on Governor Scott Walker’s controversial labor
reform bill, calling it a “state issue,” his former campaign manager and chief of
staff Matt Seaholm ran the Wisconsin arm of a third party group that organized
rallies and ran ads to help Governor Walker.
Refused to Comment on Wisconsin’s Labor Reform Bill
In 2011, Duffy refused to comment on Governor Scott Walker’s controversial labor reform bill, saying it
was a “state issue.”
“We’re not going to comment on state politics,” Duffy spokesman Daniel Son said. “He’s refrained from
commenting on it other than to say that it’s a state issue and he’s got plenty to worry about trying to get
Washington’s fiscal house in order.”
Former Campaign Manager and Chief of Staff Left to Run Wisconsin’s Americans for Prosperity
In 2011, Duffy’s former campaign manager and chief of staff Matt Seaholm left to serve as Wisconsin
director for Americans for Prosperity. [americansforprosperity.org, accessed 11/10/11]
… And Helped Organize Rallies and Ran Ads to Support Governor Walker
In 2011, Americans for Prosperity organized rallies and ran ads to support Governor Walker. [The
Hill, 2/24/11]
Not Allowed in Wausau Labor Day Parade
In 2011, Duffy was informed that he would not be allowed to walk in that year’s Labor Day parade in
Wausau. [9 WAOW News, 8/26/11]
200
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Legal Reform Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted to cut legal services funding for poor
In 2011, Duffy voted to cut legal services funding for the poor.
Voted to Cut Legal Services Funding for Poor
In 2011, Duffy voted to strike all funding, or an additional $324.4 million, for the Legal Services
Corporation. The program provides funding for essential legal services to almost $60 million Americans
living below 125 percent of the poverty level.
Republicans had earlier proposed an 18 percent cut for the program, or some $75 million in the $420
million annual budget of the LSC. Gene Nichol, professor of law at UNC-Chapel hill, noted that studies
had shown how for decades millions of poor and near poor Americans had been “effectively priced out of
the civil justice system.” [Charlotte News & Observer, Nichol op-ed, 2/28/11]
The amendment failed, 171-259. [HR 1, Duncan amendment #110, Vote #54, 2/16/11]
Urged Wisconsin Legislature to Make It A Felony For Parents Not To Report Child’s
Disappearance
In 2011, Duffy sent letters to Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald and House Assembly Speaker Jeff
Fitzgerald, urging them to pass a version of “Caylee’s Law” that would make it a felony for parents or
legal guardians to fail to report a missing child in a timely fashion.
“As a former district attorney and father of six, there are few responsibilities I take more seriously than
that of protecting our children,” Duffy stated.
“That’s why I’m asking the Wisconsin state Legislature to pass ‘Caylee’s law’ or similar legislation as
soon as possible.” [Editorial, Capital Times, 7/19/11]
Capital Times: Duffy’s Gimmick Was “Pathetic”
In a 2011 editorial, the Capital Times criticized Duffy’s letters, calling them “pathetic”.
“Unfortunately, Duffy is busy trying to gin up a debt-ceiling ‘crisis’ that forecloses the prospect of
meaningful action on jobs and other issues that need attention from Congress. So he proposes TV
gimmick fixes. The word ‘pathetic’ does not begin to describe this sorry excuse for a
congressman,” the newspaper wrote. [Editorial, Capital Times, 7/19/11]
201
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Called Himself “A Strict Constitutionalist”
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy called himself “a strict constitutionalist.” [duffyforcongress.com,
accessed 8/15/11]
… And Said The Constitution Was Under Attack
In a 2010 interview, Duffy said that the Constitution was under attack.
“I believe that the Constitution is under attack and the role of governement is being expanded,” he
said. [redstate.com, 1/13/10]
Denied Constitution Was A Living, Breathing Document
On his campaign website, Duffy denied that the Constitution was a living, breathing document.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
202
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Legislative Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted in favor of throwing out votes of members not properly sworn-in
 Pledged to post bills online 72 hours before vote
 Supported cut to Congressional pay
Duffy voted in favor of throwing out votes of members not properly sworn-in.
Voted in Favor of Throwing Out Votes of Members Not Properly Sworn-In
In 2011, Duffy voted for a resolution that struck six votes cast by Reps. Michael Fitzpatrick and Pete
Sessions as they were both in another part of the Capitol when the Speaker was administering the oath of
office to House members in the chamber. The two members conducted official – including voting and
making submissions to the Congressional Record – despite having missed the swearing-in ceremony.
In addition to deleting the six votes, the resolution ratified Sessions’ election to a standing committee and
his participation in its proceedings. [CQ Today, 1/07/11]
It was subsequently reported that Fitzpatrick and Sessions were absent because they were attending a
fundraiser on the Capitol grounds, an apparent violation of ethics rules.
The Philadelphia Inquirer editorialized that “by effectively launching his reelection bid even before taking
the oath of office, Fitzpatrick comes off as cynical or clueless…Whatever the case, Fitzpatrick subjected
himself to national embarrassment by missing the House opening last week to attend a reception attended
by more than 500 supporters at the Capitol Visitor Center.” [Philadelphia Inquirer, Editorial, 1/14/11]
Rep. Andrew Weiner suggested that the Republicans had ignored their recently adopted rules package
which included a requirement that all legislation be made public three business days before a vote. Weiner
argued that the resolution demanded more care consideration, insisting “we are dealing with a
constitutional issue and one that is without precedence.” [CQ Today, 1/07/11]
The resolution passed, 257-159. [H Res 27, Vote #11, 1/07/11]
Pledged to Post Bills Online 72 Hours Before Vote
In 2010, Duffy pledged to support posting bills online for 72 hours before Congress voted on them.
203
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“I will support posting bills online for 72 hours before Congress votes on them, to provide time to read
and review the bill,” he said. [Marshfield News, 9/21/10]
Supported Cut to Congressional Pay
In 2011, Duffy supported a cut to Congressional pay. [Leader-Telegram, 4/05/11]
204
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Local Issues
Significant Findings
 Supported end to moratorium on issuing offshore drilling permits
 Said he would like to explore iron mining in region
 One of seven Republicans to vote against ending government funding of NPR
Duffy supported an end to the moratorium on issuing offshore drilling permits,
and said he would like to explore iron mining in the region. He was one of seven
Republicans to vote against ending government funding of NPR.
Supported End to Moratorium on Issuing Offshore Drilling Permits
In 2011, Duffy co-signed a letter to President Obama that requested “an end to the de facto moratorium
and a return to the timely and responsible issuance of offshore drilling permits.” [Letter to President Obama,
Handled by Department of Interior, 2/18/11]
Said He Would Like to Explore Iron Mining in Region
In 2010, Duffy said that he would like to explore iron mining in the region.
“Not only could we mine it we could turn it into steel here and even fabricate here,” he said. “You look at
a depressed area like Ashland with that kind of resource, it would be a multi-billion-dollar investment just
to get it prepared to mine and to do it cleanly with a minimal impact on the environment.” [Spooner
Advocate, 3/07/10]
One of Seven Republicans to Vote Against Ending Government Funding of NPR
In 2011, Duffy was one of several Republicans to vote against government funding of NPR.
“My conservative base will not be happy with this vote. I’ve already heard from them. There are others
who are happy with my vote. But I can’t make everyone happy all the time,” he said. “I want to do what’s
right for the district and the vote I made was the right vote.” [Daily Press, 3/18/11]
Co-Sponsored Bill to Grant Controversial Bridge Project Environmental Exemptions
In 2011, Duffy co-sponsored a bill that would grant environmental exemptions to a project to build a
bridge over the St. Croix River.
205
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Duffy’s spokesperson defended Duffy’s co-sponsorship of the bill, saying, “To suggest that the bill is an
earmark or advocates for funding one way or another is simply false.”
The new bridge would replace an aging bridge over Stillwater, but various proposals for the new bridge
had been debated for decades. [Daily Reporter, 8/10/11]
Tax Payers for Common Sense Object to Proposal
“Taxpayers for Common Sense, a fiscal watchdog group in Washington, objects to the size and
scope of the proposed bridge. The group pointed out the new bridge would accommodate a daily
average of 18,000 cars, while the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis cost $234 million to rebuild after it
collapsed and serves 140,000 cars a day.” [Post Crescent, 2/28/12]
Opposed Closing Rural Post Offices
In 2011, Duffy opposed closing rural post offices.
“For me, I have been aggressively advocating for our post offices,” he said.
“If you’ve been a member of a small community, you know that oftentimes your identity is tied up within
your post office. You may not have a police force but you do have your post office.” [Superior Telegram,
8/09/11]
206
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Military Personnel Issues
Significant Findings
 Said military would have to do more with less
 Would consider military pensions for budget reforms
 Voted against protecting veterans and active service members from foreclosure
While discussing the federal budget, Duffy said that the military would have to do
more with less. He said he would consider military pensions for budget reforms,
and voted against protecting veterans and active service members from
foreclosure.
Said Military Would Have to Do More With Less
In 2011, while discussing the federal budget, Duffy said that the military would have to do more with less.
[Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
... Then Supported Fully Funding Efforts of American Troops
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported fully funding the efforts of American
troops. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Would Consider Military Pensions for Budget Reforms
In 2011, Duffy said he would be reluctant to change military pensions, but that he would consider
everything to reform the budget. [Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
Voted to Shut Down Emergency Mortgage Relief Program
In 2011, Duffy voted to shut down a program that provided emergency loans to unemployed homeowners
facing foreclosure. The legislation would end the Emergency Homeowner Loan Program and rescind the
unobligated funds.
The White House said it would veto the bill, saying that the program was needed to spur a housing
recovery. The White House argued that that the loan assistance could help as many as 30,000 distressed
homeowners. The CBO estimated that the program would cost $840 million over 10 years. [CQ Today,
3/11/11]
The bill passed, 242-177. [HR 836, Vote #174, 3/11/11]
207
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted Against Even Protecting Veterans and Active Service Members
Before considering terminating the emergency relief program, Duffy voted against a measure that
would have protected veterans and active service members from foreclosures.
The measure required the Secretary of HUD in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and
Veterans Affairs, to determine the amount necessary to provide assistance under the Emergency
Housing Act of 1975 to homeowners who are veterans or members of the Armed Forces on active
duty. It would also authorize Congress to appropriate this amount of assistance to veterans and
members of the Armed Forces on active duty under the Emergency Mortgage Relief Program.
The motion failed, 182-238. [HR 836, Vote #173, 3/11/11]
Voted to Make Benefits for Seniors and Veterans Harder to Get
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would make it harder for low-income veterans and Social
Security recipients to retain counsel in a civil action against the United States, like when fighting for
benefits.
The Lummis amendment imposed a seven-month moratorium on all legal fees paid under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, a Reagan-era law designed to help people afford an attorney while suing the
government.
“We’re in the middle of two wars right now and to make it harder for a veteran — fighting for his benefits
— to have an attorney is a horrible thing. That’s not what this country is about,” Robert Chishold, a
prominent veterans’ law attorney said. [Politico, 2/23/11]
The amendment passed, 232-197. [HR 1, Lummis amendment #195, Vote #85, 2/17/11]
Wore Wristband of Local Soldier Who Died in Iraq
During his 2010 campaign, Duffy worse a gray wristband with the name of Staff Sergeant Jeremy Dale
Vrooman, who died in Iraq in 2008.
“His courage, the sacrifice he made, how he saved the lives of so many other men in the military who
were with him,” Duffy said.
Duffy later put a picture of the soldier in his Congressional office. [Superior Telegram, 4/15/11]
208
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Other Social Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted to make benefits for seniors harder to get
 Voted to cut community service block grants by $100 million
Duffy voted to make benefits for seniors harder to get and voted to cut community
service block grants by $100 million.
Voted to Make Benefits for Seniors and Veterans Harder to Get
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would make it harder for low-income veterans and Social
Security recipients to retain counsel in a civil action against the United States, like when fighting for
benefits.
The Lummis amendment imposed a seven-month moratorium on all legal fees paid under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, a Reagan-era law designed to help people afford an attorney while suing the
government.
“We’re in the middle of two wars right now and to make it harder for a veteran — fighting for his benefits
— to have an attorney is a horrible thing. That’s not what this country is about,” Robert Chishold, a
prominent veterans’ law attorney said. [Politico, 2/23/11]
The amendment passed, 232-197. [HR 1, Lummis amendment #195, Vote #85, 2/17/11]
Voted to Cut Community Service Block Grants by $100 Million
In 2011, Duffy voted to cut Community Service Block Grant programs by $100 million.
The amendment was rejected, 115-316. [HR 1, Flake amendment #457, Vote #72, 2/17/11]
209
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Seniors’ Issues – Medicare, Medicaid and Prescription Drugs
Significant Findings
 Voted for budget that would end Medicare bring back “donut hole” coverage
gap
 Voted against protecting Medicare benefits from privatization
Duffy voted for the Ryan budget, which would end Medicare and bring back the
“donut hole” coverage gap for prescription drugs. He also voted against protecting
Medicare benefits from privatization.
Voted for 2011 Ryan Budget
In 2011, Duffy voted for the 2011 budget resolution proposed by Congressman Paul Ryan. [Associated
Press, 4/15/11]
The resolution passed, 235-193. [H Con Res 34, Vote #277, 4/15/11]
… Though The Ryan Budget Would End Medicare
According to the Wall Street Journal, “The plan would essentially end Medicare, which now pays
most of the health-care bills for 48 million elderly and disabled Americans, as a program that
directly pays those bills.” [Wall Street Journal, 4/4/11]
Duffy Specifically Defended Budget’s Medicare Provisions
In an interview with the Wausau Daily Herald, Duffy specifically defended the Ryan
budget’s Medicare provisions.
“I think all of us who voted for it are on board,” he said. “To vote to reform Medicare, you
sure better think there’s a problem if you’re going to take that vote.” [Wausau Daily Herald,
5/19/11]
Plan Will Lead to “Rationing”
According to NPR:
The CBO warned that higher payments could affect care as beneficiaries might be less likely to
use “new, costly, but possibly beneficial, technologies and techniques.” According to NPR, that is
“exactly the sort of rationing that so frightened Republicans when they were fighting the health
law – the health law that Ryan’s proposal would repeal, by the way.” [NPR, 4/06/11]
210
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Joe Baker, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said that “to ask people with Medicare and
Medicaid to foot the entire bill is not only unfair, but it will eventually lead to much less care and
a type of rationing […] There’s no doubt that putting more costs on consumers, particularly
upfront, leads them to access less care.” [National Journal, 4/04/11]
NCPSSM: Plan “Destroys Medicare and Cuts Social Security Benefits”
In April 2011, Max Richtman, executive vice-president of the National Committee to Preserve
Social Security and Medicare, told an audience that Ryan’s 2012 budget plan “forces millions of
American seniors to help foot the bill for a budget plan that puts the needs of middle-class
Americans far below preserving tax cuts for corporations and wealthy Americans.”
“The Ryan plan would replace the current Medicare program with vouchers and leave seniors and
the disabled - some of our most vulnerable Americans - hostage to the whims of the private
marketplace,” Richtman said. [NCPSSM press release, 4/05/11]
Ryan Plan Brings Back “Donut Hole” Coverage Gap for Prescription Drugs
According to the Associated Press, Ryan’s plan brings back the coverage “gap in the Medicare
prescription drug” benefit. [Associated Press, 4/06/11]
Voted Against Protecting Social Security and Medicare Benefits from Privatization
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have prohibited continuing appropriations
funds for fiscal year 2011 for being used in developing or implementing a system that cuts Social Security
benefits or that privatizes Social Security.
The amendment also prohibited funds from being used to develop or implement a system that cuts
Medicare benefits, eliminates guaranteed health coverage for seniors or establishes a Medicare voucher
plan that limits payments to beneficiaries in order to purchase health care in the private sector.
The motion failed, 190-239. [HJR 48, Vote #178, 2/15/11]
Opposed Expanding Enrollment in Federal Entitlement Programs
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed expanding enrollment in federal entitlement
programs.
“At a critical time when our government is still figuring out how to meet their obligations to our seniors,
Congress voted to increase federal spending and add more people to the entitlement rolls. This is
financially reckless! Before expanding entitlement programs, the government ought to figure out how to
ensure the solvency of the senior programs it has already committed to funding,” he said.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Wanted to Ensure Solvency of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid
211
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy said that “We must ensure the solvency of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.”
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 10/21/11]
Called for Modifications to Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare
In 2011, Duffy said that there was no way to fix America’s budget problem without modifications to
Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare. [Marshfield News, 3/25/11]
Criticized Cutting $500 Million in Funding for Medicare
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy criticized cutting funding for Medicare.
“The health care legislation passed this year cuts Medicare by a half a billion dollars in order to fund the
expansion of entitlements. At the same time, Medicare already maintains a $38 trillion unfunded liability;
Medicaid which pays for long-term care has trillions more in unmet needs; and Social Security’s surplus
has evaporated. Unless we strengthen these programs, government will be forced to either raise payroll
taxes by 30 percent, or cut benefits by nearly 25 percent,” he stated. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
ThinkProgress: “Duffy Gets Huffy: Congressman Tells Voters Concerned With Ryan Budget To
‘Have Your Own Town Hall’”
In April 2011, a constituent confronted Duffy about changes to the Medicare system that he supported.
After a bit of a debate, Duffy said to his constituent, “Let me tell you what. When you have your town
hall you can stand up and give your presentation.” [ThinkProgress, 4/25/11]
212
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Seniors’ Issues – Social Security Issues
Significant Findings
 Supported privatizing Social Security
 Supported budget that would privatize Social Security
 Voted against protecting Social Security from privatization
 Took money from key supporters of Social Security privatization
 Supported means testing Social Security recipients
Duffy has a controversial record on Social Security. Though numerous articles
reported that Duffy opposed Social Security privatization, the Leader Telegram
stated that Duffy in fact favored privatization. Duffy also supported a budget that
would privatize Social Security, and voted against protecting Social Security from
privatization. He accepted campaign funds from key supporters of Social Security
privatization and supported means testing Social Security recipients.
Supported Privatizing Social Security
In 2010, Duffy supported privatizing Social Security.
The Leader-Telegram reported, “Duffy has said his position favoring privatizing Social Security had to do
with protecting that money.” [Leader-Telegram, 10/26/10]
NOTE: Other newspaper articles repeatedly stated that Duffy opposed privatizing Social Security.
… Though His Website Said He Opposed Privatizing Social Security
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed privatizing Social Security.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Called for Social Security Reform
In a 2010 interview, Duffy called for Social Security reform.
The transcript is as follows:
213
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
DUFFY: Social Security – people 55 and older are looking for that in their
retirement. But folks that are in their 50s, 40s, in their late 30s like me, we realize
that that system’s not going to be there for us when we get to the age of
retirement. So those of us who look down the road, we need to reform the system
to make sure it is sustainable, and I think there are common-sense approaches to
do that. [Upfront with Mike Gousha, Minute 6:44, 5/23/10]
Supported Budget that Would Privatize Social Security
During his 2010 campaign, Duffy repeatedly expressed support for Congressman Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap
for America.” [Marshfield News, 7/16/10]
Among its provisions, the Roadmap would privatize Social Security.
NOTE: Duffy’s campaign said that he did not necessarily support the components of Ryan’s Roadmap.
Ryan Roadmap Privatizes Social Security
Ezra Klein of the Washington Post explains the implications Ryan’s budget alternative would have
on Social Security:
“Social Security gets guaranteed, private accounts that CBO says will actually cost more than the
present arrangement, further underscoring how ancillary the program is to our budget problem.”
[Washington Post, 2/01/10]
CBO: Ryan Budget Would Create Individual Accounts
According to CBO Analysis, under the Ryan Budget:
Traditional retirement benefits would be reduced below those scheduled under current law
for many workers who are age 55 or younger in 2011... A system of individual accounts
would be established in 2012. In that year, workers who are age 55 or younger would be
able to participate in voluntary individual accounts, funded with a portion of their payroll
taxes. [Congressional Budget Office letter To Paul Ryan, 1/27/10]
CBPP: Ryan’s Plan Would Divert Funds From Social Security into Private Accounts
A July 2010 report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analyzing
Representative Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap for America’s Future” included changes to Social
Security including diverting large sums from Social Security to private accounts.
“It also would divert substantial sums from the Social Security trust funds into private
accounts and then maintain Social Security solvency by transferring funds to Social
Security from the rest of the budget.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 7/07/10]
Leading Privatization Supporter: There’s No Difference Between Privatization and
Personal Accounts
214
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to the Star Tribune, “The word ‘privatization’ has been part of the Social
Security debate for many years and has been used by many Republicans. The Cato
Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington and an advocate of the idea, used to call its
effort ‘the project on Social Security privatization.’”
From the Star Tribune:
Michael Tanner, director of that project, agrees that the Democrats are
using the word because they think it’s scarier but said he thinks the
Republicans are wrong to reply with “a silly, semantic argument.”
“Republicans like to say they’re a little bit for privatization, then, when the
Democrats attack them, they curl up in a fetal position and talk about how
much they love their grandmother.”
Instead, he suggests, Republicans should defend the position that
individual accounts are the best way to save Social Security.
Cato has a fresh poll that Tanner said shows that when the issue is
properly framed, a majority of Americans favor individual accounts.
Still, he said, word choices are important. So Cato recently changed the
name of the program to “the project on Social Security choice.” [Star
Tribune, 8/5/02]
Leading Privatization Opponent: Individual Accounts Means “Privatization”
According to AARP, “‘Privatization’ is often used as shorthand for the idea of taking some
of the money workers currently pay into the Social Security system and diverting it into
individually owned accounts, where each worker would bear some risk for how his or her
investments performed. These accounts would
be ‘carved-out’ of Social Security.”
From AARP:
Diverting money away from Social Security and into individual accounts
is risky and involves trading some of today’s inflation protected, lifetime
guaranteed benefit for an account subject to market risk and not
guaranteed to last a lifetime or keep pace with inflation. Inflation, market
turns or loss of employment can mean that your private account may not
have enough money to provide an adequate benefit.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of debate on the semantics rather than the
substance. Essentially it doesn’t matter if you call the concept
‘privatization,’ ‘personalization,’ or anything else—diverting Social
215
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Security revenues into individual accounts shifts risk to the individual and
hurts the financial status of Social Security itself.” [AARP via pbs.org]
… Though Privatization Puts Seniors’ Retirement Investments at Risk
If plans like Duffy’s had been in place three years ago, when the stock market crashed, individuals could
have lost nearly 40 percent of their retirement investments. And his plan could create a windfall of up to
$279 billion in fees for his friends on Wall Street.
Privatization Would Cut Benefits…
According to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, “privatization is
not a plan to save Social Security; it is a plan to dismantle Social Security. Privatization means
increased retirement risks, severe cuts in Social Security benefits, and a multi-trillion dollar
increase in the federal debt.
“Privatization diverts money out of Social Security into individual accounts leaving an even larger
solvency problem. Privatizers fill this funding gap by dramatically cutting Social Security
benefits. They cover the rest by borrowing money, thereby increasing the debt burden on all
taxpayers by trillions of dollars over the next half century. With market-based accounts, the risk of
an adequate retirement is placed entirely on the individual.” [National Committee to Preserve Social
Security and Medicare website, accessed 7/09/08]
… And Gamble Social Security on Wall Street
According to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, “Privatization
will replace Social Security’s guaranteed defined benefits with individual investment accounts. In
other words, privatization would take money out of Social Security and have workers invest
instead in Wall Street.” [www.ncpssm.org/news/archive/vp_ssprivatization/]
DJIA Lost Nearly 40 Percent In One Year
Had seniors been relying on private social security accounts in the Stock Market during the
2008 collapse, they might have lost nearly 40 percent of their retirement savings in the 12
months leading up to the collapse. On October 9, 2007 the Dow Jones Industrial Average
closed at 14,164.53. On October 9, 2008 the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at
8,579.19. [Yahoo Finance]
Wall Street Would Make $279 Billion in Fees from Social Security Privatization
In February 2005, Newsday wrote, “No one knows whether workers would prosper in
private Social Security accounts, but financial firms would likely pull in big bucks… The
Securities Industry Association calculated that the plan would generate at most $279
billion in fees, or about 8.6 percent of the $3.3 trillion in the financial sector’s total
revenues, over 75 years.” [Newsday, 2/20/05]
Voted Against Protecting Social Security and Medicare Benefits from Privatization
216
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have prohibited continuing appropriations
funds for fiscal year 2011 for being used in developing or implementing a system that cuts Social Security
benefits or that privatizes Social Security.
The amendment also prohibited funds from being used to develop or implement a system that cuts
Medicare benefits, eliminates guaranteed health coverage for seniors or establishes a Medicare voucher
plan that limits payments to beneficiaries in order to purchase health care in the private sector.
The motion failed, 190-239. [HJR 48, Vote #178, 2/15/11]
Took Money From Key Supporters of Social Security Privatization
Duffy was supported by the congressional leadership that wanted to privatize Social Security. If their
plan had been in place two years ago when the stock market crashed, individuals could have lost nearly 40
percent of their retirement benefits.
Accepted $45,000 from Republican Leaders John Boehner and Eric Cantor
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $45,000 from Republican leadership PACs:
Date
12/18/09
4/29/10
5/24/10
5/25/10
5/25/10
3/15/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
6/17/11
Name
ERICPAC
PETEPAC
ERICPAC
The Freedom Project
The Freedom Project
ERICPAC
The Freedom Project
The Freedom Project
ERICPAC
Member
Eric Cantor
Pete Session
Eric Cantor
John Boehner
John Boehner
Eric Cantor
John Boehner
John Boehner
Eric Cantor
TOTAL
Amount
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$45,000
[fec.gov, accessed 11/04/11]
Boehner Supported Privatizing Social Security
In 2006, Boehner “said Republicans were ‘going to get serious’ about privatization and other
reforms of Social Security following the 2006 elections.” [Burlington Free Press, 8/04/06]
Cantor Supported Privatizing Social Security
In 2005, Cantor said that he backed the key proposal of Bush’s Social Security privatization plan,
the creation of private accounts for younger workers.
According to the Richmond Times Dispatch:
217
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Rep. Eric I. Cantor, R-7th, said the option for younger workers to save in a
personal account is something he backs. The chief deputy majority whip
emphasized that Bush provided a “framework” for lawmakers when they return to
work next week.
“He has sort of painted his vision of where he would like to see Social Security
go. . . . It will really be up to us in Congress to see if we can get there,” Cantor
said. [Richmond Times Dispatch, 2/03/05]
Sessions Supported Privatizing Social Security
In 2006, asked about his plan for Social Security, Sessions replied:
Anticipating future cuts to Social Security, Galveston County employees voted
overwhelmingly in 1981 to opt out of Social Security and create an alternative
plan at virtually no risk to beneficiaries. This alternative plan pools employee
money and lends it to a top-rate financial institution in return for guaranteed rates.
Annual returns average 8 percent a year.
Americans work hard for their retirement, and they deserve the option to choose
personal retirement accounts based on successful models. Galveston County
employees adopted a safe and effective retirement plan. Likewise, all Americans
deserve access to a proven model - one that’s as safe as money in the bank. [Dallas
Morning News, 3/04/05]
Supported Means Testing Social Security Recipients
In 2010, Duffy supported means testing Social Security recipients.
“We might say to the new founders of Facebook though, these billionaires, say, ‘You know what, you’re
going to get your Social Security, but it’s not going to grow as fast as the rest of ours,” he explained. “If
we do that for the upper income, and we’d have to talk about where that balance is, I think we can find a
tremendous amount of savings in Social Security that can come near to fixing the problem.” [Stevens Point
Journal, 10/08/10]
Opposed Expanding Enrollment in Federal Entitlement Programs
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed expanding enrollment in federal entitlement
programs.
“At a critical time when our government is still figuring out how to meet their obligations to our seniors,
Congress voted to increase federal spending and add more people to the entitlement rolls. This is
financially reckless! Before expanding entitlement programs, the government ought to figure out how to
ensure the solvency of the senior programs it has already committed to funding,” he said.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Said He Opposed Raising Retirement Age
218
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed raising the retirement age. [duffyforcongress.com,
accessed 8/15/11]
… But Criticized His Democratic Opponent for Appearing to Support Proposal
On his campaign website, Duffy criticized his Democratic opponent Julie Lassa by name for
appearing to support a proposal that would raise the retirement age.
“In addition, I oppose raising the retirement age which Julie Lassa appears to support,” he said.
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Called for Modifications to Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare
In 2011, Duffy said that there was no way to fix America’s budget problem without modifications to
Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare. [Marshfield News, 3/25/11]
219
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Small Business Issues
Significant Findings
 Voted against increased funding for economic development assistance
Duffy voted against increased funding for economic development assistance.
Voted Against Increased Funding for Economic Development Assistance
In 2011, Duffy voted against increased funding for economic development assistance programs in the
Economic Development Administration of the Commerce Department by $80 million. Equal funding
would be taken from funds for the periodic census at the Census Bureau.
According to Michaud, from 2004 to 2008, the EDA-funded projects directly led to the creation of
approximately 200,000 jobs nationwide. [Michaud press release, 2/16/11]
The amendment was adopted, 305-127. [HR 1, Michaud amendment #153, Vote #50, 2/16/11]
220
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Tax Issues
Significant Findings
 Signed pledge that protected tax breaks for companies shipping jobs overseas
 Endorsed by champion of the Fair Tax
 Supported flat rate federal income tax
 Voted to protect tax breaks for big oil
 Opposed taxing overseas products of US companies
 Supported cutting corporate tax rate
Duffy has taken several controversial tax positions. He signed a pledge that
protected tax breaks for companies shipping jobs overseas and was endorsed by
the National Taxpayers Union, a champion of the Fair Tax. Duffy personally
supported a flat rate federal income tax and voted to protect tax breaks for big oil.
He opposed taxing overseas products of US companies and supported cutting the
corporate tax rate.
Signed Americans for Tax Reform’s Federal Taxpayer Protection Pledge
As of 2011, Duffy was a signee of Americans for Tax Reform’s federal Taxpayer Protection Pledge,
stating that he opposed any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar
for dollar by further reducing tax rates. [atr.org, accessed 8/16/11]
… That Protected Tax Breaks for Companies that Ship Jobs Overseas
With over 200,000 looking for work in Wisconsin, Duffy signed a pledge that protected tax breaks
for companies that ship jobs overseas to places like India and China.
{ ALT LANGUAGE #1 } Even though 2,099 jobs have been lost in Wisconsin to unfair trade
deals like NAFTA, Duffy signed a pledge that protected tax breaks for companies that ship jobs
overseas to places like India and China.
Over 200,000 in Wisconsin Were Unemployed as of September 2011
As of September 2011, 238,558 were unemployed in Wisconsin. [bls.gov, accessed 11/15/11]
221
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: This number will have to be updated.
{ FOR ALT LANGUAGE #1 } NAFTA Cost Wisconsin 2,099 Jobs
According to the Economic Policy Institute, the North American Free Trade Agreement
has resulted in a net loss of 2,099 jobs for the state of Wisconsin. [Economic Policy Institute,
“NAFTA’s Cautionary Tale,” 7/20/05]
President Obama Called for the Elimination of Tax Breaks for Companies that
Create Jobs Overseas
On May 4, 2009, President Obama stated that his budget would end tax breaks for
companies that ship jobs overseas. The President’s proposal would accomplish this goal by
stopping letting American companies that create jobs overseas to take deductions on their
expenses when they do not pay any American taxes on their profits. [Obama Remarks, 5/04/09]
India and China Remain Top Outsourcing Destinations
In July 2009, Bloomberg Businessweek reported that India remains the world’s top
outsourcing destination for IT and back-office functions, with China close behind.
[Bloomberg Businessweek, 7/10/09]
… That Protects Big Oil Profits While We Pay More at the Pump
Duffy wants to let big oil companies keep reaping massive profits at our expense, while we pay
more at the pump. He signed a pledge that protects tens of billions in special tax breaks for big oil
companies, who also enjoy giant breaks on royalties from the government.
Regular Gallon of Gas in Wisconsin Cost $3.419
As of November 11, 2011, a regular gallon of gas in Wisconsin cost $3.419. [AAA Fuel
Gauge report, accessed 11/10/11]
NOTE: This number will have to be updated.
ATR Opposed Bipartisan Gang of Ten Proposal to End Tax Loopholes Enjoyed by
Oil Companies
In 2008, a group of bipartisan Senators proposed closing the tax loopholes enjoyed by oil
companies, however the ATR stated that the Republicans who co-sponsored the proposal
were violating the Pledge as it would increase the net income taxes on oil companies.
[Chattanooga Times Free Press, 9/13/08]
ATR’s specific complaint that the proposal repealed section 199 tax credits which ATR
valued at 30 Billion Dollars.
222
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
From the ATR’s Letter to Senate Co-Sponsors:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), I strongly urge you to
oppose the compromise energy plan agreed to by the “Gang of Ten” on
August 1, 2008.
We commend the Senate’s bi-partisan attempt to solve the current energy
crisis. However, the compromise plan proposed by the original “Gang of
Ten” Senators contains several fatally flawed provisions
The most glaring of which is the repeal of IRS Sec. 199 which will
raise taxes on American energy production by $30 billion, and which
by itself is a Taxpayer Protection Pledge violation. [Emphasis added; ATR
Letter, 9/10/08]
Oil Companies Have Received Breaks on Royalties from Federal Government in Gulf
of Mexico
In April 2010, the Houston Chronicle reported that the oil industry was opposing efforts to
collect royalties on oil and natural gas produced in federal waters.
A 1995 law allowed the government to waive royalty payments that are usually required
for oil and natural gas produced in federal waters, however the government has contended
that it could resume collecting royalties if oil prices rose above certain thresholds, but
Energy companies countered that royalties could resume only if a certain volume of
production had been reached. [Houston Chronicle, 7/27/10]
Oil Companies Are Able to Reclassify Royalty Payments as Taxes Giving them a
Break on American Taxes
In July 2010, the New York Times reported that since the 1950s which the State
Department’s backing oil companies have been able to reclassify the royalties charged by
foreign governments to American oil drillers as taxes which entitled the companies to
subtract those payments from their American tax bills. It is estimated that this practice will
cost the US $8.2 million over the next ten years.
From the New York Times:
Other tax breaks were born of international politics. In an attempt to deter
Soviet influence in the Middle East in the 1950s, the State Department
backed a Saudi Arabian accounting maneuver that reclassified the
royalties charged by foreign governments to American oil drillers. Saudi
Arabia and others began to treat some of the royalties as taxes, which
entitled the companies to subtract those payments from their American tax
bills. Despite repeated attempts to forbid this accounting practice,
companies continue to deduct the payments. The Treasury Department
223
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
estimates that it will cost $8.2 billion over the next decade. [New York
Times, 7/3/10]
… That Opposed Holding Big Oil Companies Accountable
Duffy signed a pledge that opposed holding big oil companies accountable for contributing their
fair share to clean up disastrous oil spills like the one in the Gulf, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill.
ATR Opposed Plan to Increase Oil Spill Liability Fund Financing
On May 28, 2010, the House passed a bill which increased the taxes which oil companies
must pay on a barrel of oil to increase funding to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, to pay
for damages from major spills like the Gulf of Mexico disaster. [Associated Press, 5/29/10;
AFP; 5/28/10]
When the bill made its way to the Senate, ATR wrote that supporting the legislation would
be a violation of the pledge as it increased the taxes on a barrel of oil.
From ATR:
Americans for Tax Reform continues to oppose the tax extenders package
in the US Senate. Besides the tax increase on a barrel of oil, the bill as a
whole is a tax increase – both a marginal rate increase and an income tax
increase, thus violating the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. [ATR, 6/22/10]
Endorsed by Fair Tax Champion, National Taxpayers Union
In 2010, Duffy was endorsed by the National Taxpayers Union Campaign Fund, the political action arm
of the National Taxpayers Union.
“A number of other candidates deserve election this fall, and NTUCF is here to support them as well,”
NTUCF President Duane Parede said. “By sending the Taxpayers’ Twenty to Washington, voters will be
sending a strong message for limited government that will echo loudly throughout the halls of the 112th
Congress.” [NTUCF press release, 10/19/10]
National Taxpayers Union Supports the Fair Tax
According to their 2011 website, the National Taxpayers Union (“NTU”) supports the Fair Tax:
Why NTU Supports the FairTax:
The Fair Tax Act would promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by
repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service,
and enacting a national sales tax to be administered primarily by the States. [ntu.org,
accessed 11/10/11]
… Though Fair Tax Hits Middle Class and Cuts Taxes for Corporations and Millionaires
224
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NTU supports a plan that would impose a 23 percent national sales tax on all of us, while
eliminating federal income taxes for corporations and reducing them for millionaires.
The Fair Tax Would Eliminate Federal Income Taxes for Corporations
According to Americans for Fair Taxation, the group that is backing the effort to impose a
Fair Tax, the tax would replace the individual income tax, payroll taxes, the corporate
income tax, the self-employment tax, and the estate tax. [Americans for Fair Taxation, “The Fair
Tax Act of 2007 – HR 25: Plain English Summary,” fairtax.org, accessed 7/30/08]
The Fair Tax Would Reduce Taxes for Millionaires
Below is a breakdown of how the Fair Tax would impact STATE taxpayers. According to
the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the bottom 80 percent of Wisconsin
taxpayers would see a tax increase of $3,459 on average, while the top 5 percent of
Wisconsin taxpayers would see a tax reduction of $43,180 on average.
Income
Low
20%
2nd 20%
Middle
20%
4th 20%
Next
15%
Next 4%
Top 1%
Bottom
80%
Top 5%
Average
Cash
Income
Average
Federal
Tax Now
Average
National
Sales Tax
Average
Burden
Changes
$11,600
$1,076
$5,314
$+4,238
24,500
3,982
7,617
+3,635
41,100
8,912
12,279
+3,367
62,700
14,273
16,870
+2,597
96,400
26,548
26,166
-382
175,000
810,000
54,040
284,151
46,768
97,296
-7,272
-186,855
35,000
7,061
10,520
+3,459
302,200
100,051
56,871
-43,180
[Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, September 2004]
… Though Fair Tax Hits Families Buying Essentials
Under the Fair Tax, families would be hit hard, paying a 23 percent sales tax on nearly everything
they buy, including groceries, prescription drugs, clothing, and gas.
NOTE: The Fair Tax does not apply to the purchase of used goods or education expenses. Hence
the use of “nearly” instead of “all”.
Fair Tax Would Apply to All Goods and Services Sold at Retail
According to Americans for Fair Taxation, the group that is backing the effort to impose a
Fair Tax, the tax would apply to all goods and services sold at retail.
225
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
It would NOT apply to the purchase of used goods or to education expenses.
From Americans for Fair Taxation:
Effective January 1, 2009 it replaces the above taxes with a national retail
sales tax on all goods and services sold at retail. The tax rate is set to be
revenue neutral – at the level necessary to replace the revenues generated
by the repealed taxes. … A 23-percent (of the tax-inclusive sales price)
sales tax is imposed on all retail sales for personal consumption of new
goods and services. Exports and the purchase of inputs by businesses (i.e.,
intermediate sales) are not taxed, nor are used goods or any savings,
investment, or education tuition expenses. [Americans for Fair Taxation, “The
Fair Tax Act of 2007 – HR 25: Plain English Summary,” fairtax.org, accessed 7/30/08]
… Including Food
Fairtax.org an organization dedicated to the implementation of the Fair Tax
specifically addresses the question “Why not just exempt food and medicine from
the tax?” in the frequently asked questions section of their website.
According to the group, “Exempting items by category is neither fair nor simple.”
[Fairtax.org FAQ]
… Including Medicine
Fairtax.org an organization dedicated to the implementation of the Fair Tax
specifically addresses the question “Why not just exempt food and medicine from
the tax?” in the frequently asked questions section of their website.
According to the group, “Exempting items by category is neither fair nor simple.”
[Fairtax.org FAQ]
… Including Clothing
According to FairTax.org, new clothing would be taxed under the Fair Tax:
The FairTax is a single-rate, federal retail sales tax collected only
once, at the final point of purchase of new goods and services for
personal consumption. Used items are not taxed. Business-tobusiness purchases for the production of goods and services are not
taxed. A rebate makes the effective rate progressive. [Fairtax.org FAQ]
… Including Gas
Factcheck.org, an organization that checks the validity of claims made in political
advertising and other media, confirmed that the Fair Tax would not only apply to
gasoline, but would be placed on top of existing taxes.
226
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to Factcheck.org, the list would include:
 Purchases of new homes
 Rent
 Interest on credit cards, mortgages and car loans
 Doctor bills
 Utilities
 Gasoline
 Legal fees [Factcheck.org, “Unspinning the Fair Tax,” 5/31/07]
… Though Fair Tax Hits Families Paying Their Mortgage
By supporting the Fair Tax, NTU supports eliminating federal tax deductions for mortgage and
property taxes, which would raise taxes for the middle-class.
Fair Tax Would Eliminate the Mortgage Interest Deduction
According to Americans for Fair Taxation, an organization that supports a shift from our
federal and state tax system to a 23% national sales tax, the Fair Tax would make mortgage
interest deductions “irrelevant.”
In a 2007 report the organization released on the impact of the Fair Tax on home
ownership, Americans for Fair Taxation state that the new tax system would treat home
purchases like any other retail good.
From the Americans for Fair Taxation report:
“Under the FairTax, the purchase of a home, just like the purchase of a
car, food, or any good or service for personal use is seen for what it is: An
item of consumption. Since the FairTax taxes all consumption without
exception (except previously taxed goods and services), the FairTax
imposes a 23 percent (tax-inclusive rate) tax on the purchase price of new
homes.”
The report goes on to say that the FairTax “taxes new homes at 23 percent and repeals the
income tax along with the [mortgage interest deduction].” [American for Fair Taxation,
“Promoting Home Ownership: How the Fair Tax’s Benefits for Homeowners Exceed the Mortgage Interest
Deduction,” 2007, accessed 9/17/08]
… Though Fair Tax Double Taxes Our Seniors
Under the Fair Tax, seniors would be taxed twice.
Seniors Who Saved Would Face Double Tax Under Fair Tax System
According to PolitiFact.com, seniors who had saved their money would face a “double
tax” under the Fair Tax system:
227
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“Then we checked with the SEIU. They acknowledged that the Fair Tax
would be a replacement for the current tax system. But they made an
interesting point -- that for seniors, the explicit target audience for the ad,
there is something that you might call double taxation. For many years,
seniors paid taxes on their income when they earned it. Whatever they
didn’t spend, they saved, and in their retirement years, when they
aren’t earning fresh income that would be tax-free under the Fair
Tax, those accumulated savings would be spent -- and thus taxed at 23
percent. Voila -- double taxation.” [politifact.com, 10/20/10]
Economic Experts Agreed the Fair Tax Would Double Tax Seniors
In 2010, former Reagan and Bush administration official Bruce Bartlett and Urban
Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center senior fellow Bob Williams both said
that the Fair Tax would double tax seniors:
“Bartlett said the proposal ‘penalizes those who are older who have saved
for their retirement during an era when saving was heavily penalized by
the income tax. But rather than being able to spend their savings tax free,
as they anticipated, they will now have to pay sales taxes on everything
they buy, including health care. It will be hard for them to avoid seeing
this as a double tax.
Bob Williams, a senior fellow with the Urban Institute-Brookings
Institution Tax Policy Center, agreed that the Fair Tax double-taxes
savings.” [politifact.com, 10/20/10]
Supported Flat Rate Federal Income Tax
According to a 2010 scorecard from the Christian Coalition, Duffy supported “some version of a flat rate
federal income tax.” [Christian Coalition scorecard, 2010]
… Though A Flat Tax Would Shift Burden from Rich to Non Rich
According to a report by the Economic Policy Institute, lower tax rates for the wealthy under a flat
tax will have to be financed by some combination of higher taxes on the middle class and larger
budget deficits.
A flat tax that raises the same revenues as our current tax code would shift a significant portion of
the tax burden from the rich to average workers.
According to Citizens for Tax Justice, under a flat tax, the fortunate few with incomes above
$200,000 will see their taxes fall by an average of $53,940. [Falling Flat: The Dubious Case for a Flat Tax,
Economic Policy Institute, 1/17/96]
Supported Two-Tier Personal Income Tax
228
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy supported a two-tier personal income tax system instead of the six brackets currently used.
[Marshfield News, 9/30/10]
Wanted to “Explore” Two-Tier System
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to “explore” a two-tier system.
“Since the vast majority of small businesses file taxes as individuals, by creating a simpler tax
code, we reduce costs while improving cost certainty,” he explained. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed
8/15/11]
Supported Cutting Federal Corporate Tax Rate
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported cutting the federal corporate tax rate.
“We should get closer to the corporate tax rate average determined by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (this is currently 26 percent). This will lessen the incentive for businesses
and jobs to move overseas, as well as substantially boost investor, business, and consumer confidence.
By reducing this tax, we can spur job creation in America and build a more competitive economic
environment to attract businesses from across the world,” he explained. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed
8/15/11]
Standard 25% Corporate Tax Should Be Set
In September 2011, Duffy said, “Top tax right is at 35%, I think take it down to 25 but get ride of all
loopholes. You have companies like GE who don’t pay any taxes. I don’t care how high you raise it, they
don’t pay taxes. Set it at 25%, it is competitive at a global scale but make them pay 25%. No one gets
away without paying anything. That’s the right thing we should do. Will it be hard to restructure? Yeah.
Are there interests who don’t want it to happen? Yeah. I have voted to do that and I’ll continue to vote to
do that to make a tax code that works. That’s flatter, fairer, and works with the American people and
people pay their fair share.” [Youtube, 09/12/11]
Voted to Protect Tax Breaks for Big Oil Companies
In March 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have repealed oil and gas production tax breaks
for major integrated oil companies for the proposed two week period in the House budget continuing
resolution.
Rep. William Keating, who offered the motion to recommit, said, “Our alternative is an alternative of
sensible spending cuts. Let’s stop sending taxpayer money to the most profitable companies in the world.”
[CQ Today, 3/01/11]
The motion failed, 176-249. [HJR 44, Vote #153, 3/01/11]
Opposed Taxing Overseas Products of US Companies
229
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed taxing overseas products of US companies.
“The U.S. already has the second highest corporate tax code. The tax increases my opponent would place
on companies doing business overseas would make our competitive disadvantage even worse, and lead to
the outsourcing of more jobs,” he explained. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Duffy Backed by Leaders Who Supported Billions in Tax Breaks for Big Oil
Duffy is supported by the same Congressional leaders who supported billions in special tax breaks for big
oil and whose leader wanted to let BP off the hook for the oil spill in the Gulf and make taxpayers foot the
bill for environmental cleanup and economic damage.
Accepted $45,000 from Republican Leaders John Boehner and Eric Cantor
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted $45,000 from Republican leadership PACs:
Date
12/18/09
4/29/10
5/24/10
5/25/10
5/25/10
3/15/11
5/31/11
5/31/11
6/17/11
Name
ERICPAC
PETEPAC
ERICPAC
The Freedom Project
The Freedom Project
ERICPAC
The Freedom Project
The Freedom Project
ERICPAC
Member
Eric Cantor
Pete Session
Eric Cantor
John Boehner
John Boehner
Eric Cantor
John Boehner
John Boehner
Eric Cantor
TOTAL
Amount
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$45,000
[fec.gov, accessed 11/04/11]
Boehner and Cantor Voted for Massive Energy Company Tax Breaks, Including $2.6 Billion
for Oil and Gas
In 2005, Boehner and Cantor voted in favor of $14.6 billion in tax breaks and credits for energy
companies as part of the Energy Policy Act. [HR 6, Vote #445, 7/28/05]
Appearing before a House committee in April 2008, executives from the nation’s five largest oil
companies were pressed to explain why they should continue to get billions of dollars in tax
breaks when they made $123 billion last year while motorists pay record prices at the gas pump.
[Associated Press, 4/01/08]
Energy Bill Included a $2.6 Billion Tax Break for the Oil and Gas Industry
According to the New York Times, the 2005 energy bill contained a $2.6 billion tax break for
companies producing, refining and distributing oil and gas. [New York Times, 7/28/05]
Bush Signed Bill that Gave Tax Breaks to Big Oil
230
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2005, President Bush signed the bill that gave over $14 billion in tax cuts to energy companies,
including $2.6 billion to oil companies.
“Today, I have signed into law H.R. 6, the ‘Energy Policy Act of 2005.’ This legislation promotes
dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound production and distribution of energy for
America’s future,” said the President. [White House, “President’s Statement on Energy Policy Act of 2005,”
8/08/05]
Wanted to Reduce Marginal Tax Rate for Individuals and Small Businesses
On his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to reduce the marginal tax rate for individuals and small
businesses. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Supported Extending Bush Tax Cuts
In 2010, Duffy supported extending the Bush tax cuts. [Wausau Daily Herald, 9/29/10]
Called for “Simpler, Smarter, Fairer” Individual Income Tax
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported a “simpler, smarter, fairer” individual income
tax. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Wanted to Remove Loopholes in Tax Code
In 2011, Duffy supported removing corporate loopholes in the tax code in exchange for lowering the top
rate in the tax code down to 25 percent.
“There are loopholes and there are nooks and crannies in that tax code that favor the powerful,” he said.
“No one (should) get away with anything.” [Stevens Point Journal, 9/08/11]
Criticized “Corporate Welfare”
In 2011, Duffy criticized “corporate welfare” in the tax code.
“We have corporate welfare going on,” he said. “There are nooks and crannies in the tax code that allow
these people to hide their money. They don’t pay 35 percent on those dollars. They pay far less than that.
Let’s get rid of all these dark holes where money is hidden. Let’s shine light on the process. Bring it down
and have people pay 25 percent. Instead of paying nothing.” [Spooner Advocate, 4/28/11]
… And Supported Eliminating Tax Breaks for Large Corporations
In 2011, Duffy supported eliminating tax breaks for large corporations. [Stevens Point Journal, 4/18/11]
Supported Obama’s Tax Plan to Allow Businesses to Deduct Capital Investments Upfront
231
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy supported Obama’s tax plan to allow businesses to
deduct capital investments upfront:
[duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Washington Examiner: “Duffy interrupts, laughs at his own constituents at town hall”
At an April 2011 town hall, after a constituent claimed Duffy voted for a tax cut for the wealthy, the
congressman laughed at his constituent. [Washington Examiner, 4/22/11]
232
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Terrorism and Homeland Security
Significant Findings
 Voted to cut $19 million from Defense Department operations
 Voted to cut Defense Department research on alternative energies
Duffy voted to cut $19 million from Defense Department operations and to cut
Defense Department research on alternative energies.
Voted to Cut $19 Million from Defense Department Operations
In 2011, Duffy voted to reduce funding for Defense Department operations and maintenance by $18.75
million.
“If we cannot do this on defense...where can we do it?” asked Rep. Jeff Flake, the Arizona Republican
who sponsored the amendment to cut $19 million for commissions. [Wall Street Journal, 2/16/11]
The amendment failed, 207-223. [HR 1, Flake amendment #370, Vote #41, 2/15/11]
Voted to Cut Defense Department Research on Alternative Energies
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would reduce funding for Defense Department procurement,
research and innovation programs by $115.5 million. The aim of reduced funding was for alternative
energy research.
The amendment failed, 109-320. [HR 1, Pompeo amendment #86, Vote #44, 2/15/11]
233
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Terrorism and Homeland Security Issues – Civil Liberties
Significant Findings
 Voted to allow library activity surveillance
 Voted against requiring PATRIOT Act provisions to comply with the
Constitution
Duffy voted to allow library activity surveillance and against requiring PATRIOT
Act provisions to comply with the constitution.
Voted to Allow for Library Activity Surveillance
In 2011, Duffy against prohibiting funds in the Republicans’ continuing resolution to be used under a
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) order requiring the production of library circulation records,
library patron lists, book sales or book customer lists.
The amendment was rejected, 196-231. [HR 1, Nadler amendment #524, Vote #95, 2/18/11]
Voted Against Requiring PATRIOT Act Provisions Comply with Constitution
In 2011, Duffy voted against a measure that would have added language to the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act
of 2004 that would ensure complete compliance with the U.S. Constitution relating to access to business
records, individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers and roving wiretaps.
In addition, it would require expedited review of federal civil proceedings for any allegations of violations
of such rights.
The measure failed, 186-234. [HR 514, Vote #35, 2/14/11]
234
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Trade Issues
Significant Findings
 Called for free-trade competition against China
 Voted to allow government contracts with companies shipping jobs overseas
 Flip-flopped on tariffs
Duffy called for free-trade competition against China, even if its workers made
one-twentieth what Americans workers made. Duffy also voted to allow
government contracts with companies shipping jobs overseas. He flip-flopped on
his opposition to tariffs.
Called for Free-Trade Competition Against China
In 2010, Duffy called for free-trade economic competition against other nations including China. [Record
Review, 2/17/10]
… Even If Chinese Workers Made One-Twentieth What American Workers Made
In 2010, Duffy called for free-market competition against China even if its workers made onetwentieth what American workers made.
“Set us free and we can compete with anybody, even if a Chinese worker makes one-twentieth of
what an American worker makes,” he said. “That’s because we are more productive, harder
working and more intelligent.” [Record Review, 2/17/10]
Allowed Government Contracts with Companies Shipping American Jobs Overseas
In January 2011, Duffy voted against a motion that would prevent government spending on contracts with
companies determined to have outsourced American jobs abroad.
The motion to recommit required the Rules Committee to report an amendment that would specify that,
when the House Budget Committee chairman set a discretionary spending limit for the remainder of fiscal
2011, no spending would be allocated for a contract with a company the Labor secretary determined to
have shipped jobs abroad. [CQ Today, 1/25/11]
The motion failed, 184-242. [H Res 38, Vote #19, 1/25/11]
Flip-Flopped on Tariffs
235
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy flip-flopped on his opposition to tariffs:
FLIP: Criticized President Roosevelt for Imposing Tariffs
In 2010, Duffy criticized President Franklin Roosevelt for imposing tariffs on imports during the
Great Depression. [Record Review, 2/17/10]
FLIP: Opposed Tariffs Unless Other Countries Were “Illegally Dumping” Products
In September 2010, Duffy said he opposed tariffs unless other countries were “illegally dumping”
their products into the US.
“I don’t believe in tariffs, unless it is determined other countries are illegally dumping their
products into this country,” he said. [Central Wisconsin Sunday, 9/12/10]
FLOP: Supported Taxing Foreign Imports
Three weeks later after stating he did not believe in tariffs, Duffy said that he supported taxing
foreign imports. [Marshfield News, 9/30/10]
FLIP: Reiterated Opposition to Tariffs
By later October 2010, Duffy reiterated his opposition to tariffs.
“I don’t believe in tariffs, unless it is determined other countries are illegally dumping their
products into this country. I do believe that in America, we can compete with anyone in the world
in this global marketplace,” he stated. [Central Wisconsin Sunday, 10/31/10]
Voted for Free Trade Agreements with Panama, Columbia, and South Korea
In 2011, Duffy voted for free trade agreements with Panama, Columbia, and South Korea.
“By enabling America to compete on a level playing field, we can grow our economy and get people back
to work,” he said. “Exports are playing an increasingly important role for the future of our economy and
jobs in Wisconsin.” [Herald Times Reporter, 10/15/11]
Criticized Opponent for Focusing On Jobs Going to Mexico When They Were Also Going to Other
States
In 2010, Duffy criticized his Democratic opponent Julie Lassa for failing to point out that when Polaris
closed its plant in Osceola, its jobs were not only being shifted to Mexico, but to other states like Iowa
and Minnesota.
“It’s disingenuous for Julie Lassa to point to Mexico as the problem when many of the jobs are simply
crossing the state line to Minnesota,” he said. [Inter-County Leader, 5/27/10]
236
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Wanted to Export Wisconsin Products, Not Wisconsin Jobs
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to export Wisconsin products, not Wisconsin
jobs.
“With 96 percent of consumers living outside of the United States, we must compete and we must export.
According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in 2008, Wisconsin exported $20.5 billion in manufactured
goods, which supported over 162,000 manufacturing jobs,” he argued. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Wanted Better Tax Treatment for Exports
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted “better tax treatment” for American exports.
“When our products are produced in Wisconsin, they are taxed both here and when they arrive in another
country – putting the U.S. and Wisconsin at a competitive disadvantage. But, when products are exported
from other countries, those countries lift their corporate tax and we don’t tax the product when it comes
into America,” he explained. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
Opposed Taxing Overseas Products of US Companies
According to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy opposed taxing overseas products of US
companies.
“The U.S. already has the second highest corporate tax code. The tax increases my opponent
would place on companies doing business overseas would make our competitive disadvantage
even worse, and lead to the outsourcing of more jobs,” he explained. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed
8/15/11]
Called A “Free Trader” By Local Newspaper
In 2010, the Record Review called Duffy a “free trader.” [Record Review, 2/17/10]
237
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Transportation Issues
Significant Findings
 Staffers attended unveiling of additions to local regional airport
Duffy staffers attended an unveiling of additions to a local regional airport.
Duffy Staffers Attended Unveiling of Additions to Local Regional Airport
In 2011, Duffy staffers attended an event unveiling $3.6 million in additions to the Chippewa Valley
Regional Airport.
Federal funds had paid for 93 percent of the project. [Leader-Telegram, 7/21/11]
238
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Veterans’ Issues
Significant Findings
 Hijacked jobs fair for veterans
 Voted to make benefits for veterans harder to get
Duffy hijacked a jobs fair for veterans, and voted to make benefits for veterans
harder to get.
Hijacked Jobs Fair for Veterans
The following outlines Duffy’s hijacking a jobs fair for veterans:
FIRST: Jobs Fair Was Originally Targeted Veterans
According to the Stevens Point Journal, the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
originally planned to host the event, on the same date and in the same location, for veterans
seeking job opportunities. [Stevens Point Journal, 10/17/11]
THEN: Duffy Joined, And Jobs Fair for Targeted the Unemployed
In 2011, Duffy and the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development organized a jobs fair
for the unemployed. [Wausau Daily Herald, 10/19/11]
Duffy’s Office Called It “Duffy’s Job Fair”
In a 2011 press release announcing the job fair, Duffy’s office referred to it as “Duffy’s
Job Fair.” [Duffy press release, 9/30/11]
… After Duffy Voted to Eliminate Funding for Wisconsin Jobs Programs
In 2011, Duffy voted for a bill that would eliminate funding for the Workforce Investment
Act. [HR 1, Vote #147, 2/19/11; Buffalo BusinessFirst, 2/24/11]
According to the Northern Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board, “Since 2008
northwestern Wisconsin has assisted over 3,125 individuals with skill assessments, case
management, employment support services and/or training service through the Workforce
Investment Act. Most of those individuals have found gainful employment and 64% of the
current adult and dislocated workers are enrolled in training programs.” [NWWIB press
release, 2/17/11]
239
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Voted to Make Benefits for Seniors and Veterans Harder to Get
In 2011, Duffy voted for an amendment that would make it harder for low-income veterans and Social
Security recipients to retain counsel in a civil action against the United States, like when fighting for
benefits.
The Lummis amendment imposed a seven-month moratorium on all legal fees paid under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, a Reagan-era law designed to help people afford an attorney while suing the
government.
“We’re in the middle of two wars right now and to make it harder for a veteran — fighting for his benefits
— to have an attorney is a horrible thing. That’s not what this country is about,” Robert Chishold, a
prominent veterans’ law attorney said. [Politico, 2/23/11]
The amendment passed, 232-197. [HR 1, Lummis amendment #195, Vote #85, 2/17/11]
240
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Appendix I – Paid Media Summary
The following outlines paid media from the 2010 and 2012 campaign cycles.
NOTE: Video of the ads below is available from the DCCC Research Department.
2012 General Election
House Majority PAC: “Struggling”
10/14/11
:30
ANCR: Congressman Sean Duffy... His favorite meal is steak and sushi. No wonder he says he’s
“struggling” on his $174,000 dollar salary. He’s so out of touch. It shouldn’t surprise us Duffy voted for
tax cuts for millionaires. Tax cuts for Wall Street. Even to protect profits for companies that ship jobs
overseas. While Sean Duffy “struggles” to keep sushi on his table... Maybe he should work to help keep
food on ours.
ANCR: The House Majority PAC is responsible for the content of this advertising.
SEIU-Americans United for Change: “Tell Congressman Sean Duffy: Don’t Drive America’s
Economy Off A Cliff”
7/20/11
:30
ANCR: Congressman Sean Duffy and the Republicans in Congress are driving us toward the edge of the
cliff. Recklessly risking default. Recklessly risking jobs and the American economy. They’re willing to
risk it all to protect tax breaks for millionaires, oil companies and CEOs who fly around in corporate jets.
Even if the rest of us crash and burn. Tell Congressman Duffy -- Don’t drive America’s economy off a
cliff.
ANCR: Paid for by SEIU and Americans United for Change
American United for Change: “Sean Duffy Voted to End Medicare”
4/22/11
:30
ANCR: Sean Duffy looks like a nice young man. But on April 15th, he voted to end Medicare and its
guaranteed health care benefits. Instead, he wants seniors to get coverage from private insurance
companies. Under Duffy’s plan, seniors’ costs will go up over $6,000. Duffy wants to use that money to
give millionaires a $200,000 tax break. Ending Medicare so millionaires can get another tax break?
Really? Call Congressman Duffy and ask, what were you thinking?
241
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Crossroads GPS: “Flood”
2/08/11
1:00 (Radio)
ANCR: They nearly bankrupted America with trillions in new spending and debt. Cut Medicare. Raised
taxes, while millions lost jobs. But then America spoke, we rose up and took our country back. We sent
Sean Duffy to do the job the Washington politicians wouldn’t do — to stop the bailouts and government
spending so small businesses could start hiring again. Unleashing America’s free enterprise to create jobs.
But Washington liberals like Nancy Pelosi still aren’t listening. A week after President Obama called on
Congress to work together, Pelosi’s gang attacked Sean Duffy for trying to fix the budget mess Pelosi
created. Call Sean Duffy at 715-298-9344, tell him to keep up the fight, to get spending under control.
We stand with Sean Duffy, not Nancy Pelosi’s politics of spend and smear.
ANCR: Common sense, brought to you by Crossroads GPS.
DCCC: (Untitled)
1/31/11
1:00 (Radio)
ANCR: Here in Wisconsin the recession is still hitting hard, good job openings are really scarce. So it was
good to hear President Obama’s plan to make the economy work for the middle class again. Invest in
education to train our children for the jobs of the future, maintain America’s lead in technology with more
research and development, and reduce the deficit with an overall budget freeze. That plan makes a lot of
sense. But Congressman Sean Duffy supports a plan in Congress that would cut education by 40 percent.
And his plan would cut science and technology research by 40 percent, too. Research and development is
how we get the new products that create new jobs. How does cutting that help us compete with China and
India? It doesn’t make sense. We should tell Sean Duffy to work with President Obama to create jobs,
instead of supporting a partisan plan that costs jobs.
ANCR: Paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, www.DCCC.org, and not
authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. The Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising.
2010 General Election
NRCC: “Forecast”
10/26/10
:30
ANCR: It’s a blizzard of negative TV ads from Team Lassa. Forecast calls for more of the same. The
press is calling the attacks misleading, ridiculous, evidence does not support the charge. In Madison,
242
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Lassa rained on us with higher taxes, reckless spending and soaring unemployment. If Lassa joins Pelosi
in Washington, 90% chance of our economy worsening. Brrr, that’s cold.
DCCC: “Take A Bow, Sean Duffy, This Is Your Curtain Call”
10/21/10
:30
ANCR: Sean Duffy arrived to rave reviews. Wall Street loved Duffy’s signing of a pledge that protected
tax breaks for corporations sending jobs overseas. But beneath the surface... The violent crime rate
quadrupled while Duffy was DA… And Duffy supported a plan that CUTS Social Security’s guaranteed
benefit. Duffy lived LARGE. But Wisconsin families … were left behind. Take a bow, Sean Duffy – this
is your curtain call. Show’s over.
ANCR: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
Duffy: “Tough As Nails”
10/15/10
:30
MAN: Take it from somebody who knows Sean Duffy is as tough as nails prosecutor. He’s a man of
character and integrity. I worked side-by-side with Sean putting criminals behind bars. Sean’s always
aggressively prosecuted violent crimes and sexual assaults. As District Attorney, Sean was never afraid
to take on the tough cases and seek justice. Law enforcement could always call on Sean Duffy to get the
job done. His 90% trial conviction rate speaks for itself.
DUFFY: I’m Sean Duffy and I approve this message.
DCCC: “Sean Duffy – Reality TV Star and Occasional District Attorney”
10/13/10
:30
ANCR: In Ashland’s justice system, citizens were represented by reality TV star and occasional DA Sean
Duffy. This… is his story. While Duffy was DA, violent crime quadrupled. Sexual predators and repeat
offenders: let off easy. DA Duffy? Starring in his own campaign. Duffy was reimbursed ten grand so he
could campaign while serving as DA. Criminals had it easy. Wisconsin taxpayers … got rolled.
ANCR: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
NRCC: “Julie Lassa Is The Problem”
10/09/10
243
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
:30
ANCR: Julie Lassa isn’t part of the problem; she is the problem. Ignoring the warning signs, voting for
billions in new spending, leaving us with a deficit, pushing for a Canadian-style government takeover of
healthcare, unemployment got worse, not better. We asked the Madison politicians to stop; Lassa
wouldn’t listen. Julie Lassa: she’s bad in Madison. She’ll be worse in Washington.
AFP: “Tell Lassa No New Taxes”
10/07/10
:30
ANCR: “Julie Lassa says she knows how to milk a dollar. Really? Lassa supports preserving much of
Nancy Pelosi’s trillion-dollar health care bill and voted for government-run health care here in Wisconsin,
and Lassa’s voted for millions in job-killing taxes and is even open to new tax hikes in Washington.
Wisconsin families can’t afford Lassa’s big government and higher taxes. Tell Julie Lassa: Wisconsin
needs more jobs, not more taxes.”
NRCC: “Julie Lassa’s Economic Plan”
10/03/10
:30
ANCR: “In Madison, Julie Lassa chairs the economic development committee. The results?
Unemployment up 64%, 162K jobs lost. Lassa’s strategy? Increase spending, support the largest tax
increase in state history. Lassa’s big government ideas didn’t work in Madison, they won’t work in
Washington. Want work? Don’t let Lassa get work in Washington.”
DCCC: “Sean Duffy – Washington Insider”
10/01/10
:30
ANCR: We’re here LIVE at the premiere of the “Wall Street Invades Washington”…A reality-based
drama starring Sean Duffy. Critics say Duffy plays the consummate politician… Putting powerful special
interests before Wisconsin’s working families. Wall Street loves Duffy’s support for tax breaks to big
corporations sending jobs overseas. The reviews are pouring in: “Born to play a Washington politician”
“If you like special interests – you’ll love Sean Duffy.” Wisconsin may feel different.
ANCR: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
Lassa: “Hit The Road”
9/30/10
:30
244
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
LASSA: I’m Julie Lassa and I approve this message.
ANCR: Long before Sean Duffy resigned as Madison County District Attorney, he hit the road. While in
office Duffy was reimbursed for driving 27,000 miles to political events, enough to circle the globe. But
as Ashland DA, Duffy didn’t go the extra mile. Duffy repeatedly plea-bargained sexual predators, violent
crime quadrupled and sexual assault rose to the highest rate in the state. With a record like that, no
wonder he’s in such a hurry.
Duffy: “Get America Rolling Again”
9/28/10
:30
DUFFY: Washington’s reckless spending and government growth is spinning our country out of control.
The economy’s suffering and our working folks have been tossed aside. Our government’s trillions of
dollars in debt and our kids are left to soak up the cost. It’s so bad, even our seniors have lost their
footing.
DUFFY: I’m Sean Duffy and I approve this message because it’s time we dunk our career politicians and
we get our country back on track.
NRCC: “Don’t Let Julie Lassa Near Washington”
9/25/10
:30
ANCR: Julie Lassa supported Washington’s big government health care scheme. Worse still, in Madison,
Lassa supported a Canadian-style plan for government control of health care. Need to see your doctor?
Take a number. Need an operation? Get in line. To pay for it: a massive new payroll tax. Julie Lassa:
bad ideas in Madison; don’t let her near Washington.
Lassa: “Sean Duffy No Show”
9/21/10
:30
LASSA: I’m Julie Lassa and I approve this message.
GOGLIN: Sean holds himself out as being a successful prosecutor.
DUFFY: For the past 7 years, I’ve been the District Attorney of Ashland County.
GOGLIN: We did not see him often. His campaign was taking him away from the job. All the time,
witnesses, victims would have to wait in the hallway for him to come to work. The quality of services that
were provided to the citizens of this county suffered. Sean Duffy was a no show.
245
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NRCC: “Julie Lassa Not Being Honest About Sean Duffy”
9/17/10
:30
ANCR: Julie Lassa and the Democrats aren’t being honest about Sean Duffy and Social Security. The
Daily Herald says Lassa is “misleading.” Politifact says, “the Democrats’ claim is not just false, it’s
ridiculously so. Pants on fire.” Is that the polite way of saying they’re lying? Lassa says we could use
less bull in Washington. She should start with her own campaign.
Duffy: “Bringing The Axe to Washington”
9/15/10
:30
DUFFY: I come from a long line of lumberjacks. My family has a proud heritage of swinging the ax.
I’ve always been quick to take on a big piece of timber and I’m just as ready to topple the big spending in
Washington. Our national debt has grown sky high thanks to the liberals in DC. I’ll work in Congress to
cut spending and balance the budget.
DUFFY: I’m Sean Duffy and I approve this message because I’ll bring the ax to Washington.
DCCC: “Sean Duffy Is Out Of Touch”
9/13/10
:30
ANCR: Is Sean Duffy that out of touch? Think about your Grandparents…or the working mom trying to
make ends meet. Everyone’s thinking about retirement security. So how could Sean Duffy support a plan
to privatize Social Security? Duffy lives large. But the Hollywood lifestyle and powerful DC friends
mean Sean Duffy’s out of touch with Wisconsin. Sean Duffy may not be worried about HIS retirement
security… but the rest of us are.
ANCR: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
NRCC: “Two Sides”
9/12/10
:30
ANCR: Julie Lassa has two sides. Lassa says she won’t take a pay raise, but in Madison, Lassa took a pay
raise. Lassa says she’ll cut spending, but in Madison she voted for millions in pork products. Lassa talks a
balanced budget, but left us with a deficit. She’d be right at home in Washington. But we can’t afford
either side of Julie Lassa.
246
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Lassa: “Someone”
9/07/10
:30
ANCR: A plant moves to Mexico; 500 jobs are lost and Sean Duffy defends the company that outsourced
them. Sean Duffy supports tax breaks for companies that send jobs overseas, has no plan to help create
new jobs.
DUFFY: I can’t create jobs.
ANCR: We need someone who can. Julie Lassa never forgot what it was like when her father got laid off.
That’s why she’ll fight to end unfair trade deals and give tax credits to businesses that create jobs at home.
Julie Lassa – she’ll work for us.
LASSA: I’m Julie Lassa and I approve this message.
Duffy: “Pioneers and Lumberjacks”
9/01/10
:30
DUFFY: My family settled here in the 1880s. they were pioneers and lumberjacks. I’m the 10th of 11
kids, I worked my way through school competing in lumberjack competitions, became a special
prosecutor and a district attorney. Today as a father of 6, there’s a lot at stake for my family and our
country. I’ll take on Washington, cut the spending and support our small businesses - the true job creators
– so all our children will inherit a stronger America.
DUFFY: I’m Sean Duffy and I approve this message.
DCCC: “Sean Duffy Doesn’t Get It”
8/30/10
:30
ANCR: Politicians like Sean Duffy just don’t get it. When we should be fighting to protect Social
Security, Sean Duffy backed a plan to privatize it. Privatizing would cut the guaranteed benefit and
gamble seniors’ retirement on the stock market. Remember the crash? Families could have lost nearly
forty percent of their retirement benefits. Forty percent. The plan to privatize Social Security supported by
Sean Duffy… is the wrong choice for Wisconsin’s families.
ANCR: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
Lassa: (Untitled)
247
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
8/25/10
:30
LASSA: Growing up in a dairy farm, my dad taught me not to take any bull and how to milk every dollar
for what it’s worth. Two skills they could use in Washington. That’s why I’ll fight to cut Congress’ pay
by ten percent until they lower unemployment and won’t accept a raise unless there’s a balanced budget.
No more earmarks, no big contracts, either. I’m Julie Lassa and I approve this message because
Washington needs to hear some Wisconsin common sense.
New Prosperity Foundation: (Untitled)
8/02/10
:30
ANCR: With the national debt skyrocketing, we can’t afford more big-spending politicians in Washington
like Julie Lassa. Lassa voted in Madison for record-level spending, forcing the state budget 2.5 billion
dollars in debt, one of the worst deficits in the country. And Lassa even voted for the largest tax hike in
Wisconsin history.
ANCR: The New Prosperity Foundation approved and paid for this ad because Julie Lassa has a record of
higher taxes, more spending, and we just can’t afford it.
NRCC: “Obama’s Spending Architect”
4/14/10
:30
ANCR: Barack Obama is building onto an overwhelming national debt. Over $100,000 for every
taxpayer. Who can you hold accountable? How about the architect of Obama’s spending, David Obey?
Obey chairs the Appropriations Committee. Obama’s spending gets Obey’s stamp of approval. It’s a
Niagara Falls of money flowing out of Washington. Call David Obey. Remind him it’s not Washington’s
money, it’s your money.
ANCR: The National Republican Congressional Committee is responsible for the content of this
advertising.
Duffy: “What They’re Saying”
2/15/10
:30
<NO AUDIO>
“A successful District Attorney” – Time 2/1/10
“Gaining traction.” - Superior Telegram, 2/4/10
248
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
“A serious, yet positive reformer.” -Wall St. Journal 1/7/10
The next Scott Brown. -Time Magazine
#3 Top Conservative for 2010 – The Washington Independent
#1 recommended House Candidate – RedState.com
Who is he?
Sean Duffy
Successful District Attorney
Champion Lumberjack
Positive reformer
Father of 5
249
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Appendix II – Campaign Finance
Items of Interest
 Potentially drove over 32,000 miles for his campaign while working as
Ashland County DA
 Reimbursed over $50,000 by his campaign
 Criticized bank bailout, but accepted nearly $30,000 from employees and
PACs of bailed out banks
 Accepted $20,000 from Koch Industries’ PAC
 Raised over $1,000,000 from PACs
Duffy’s campaign finances raise several concerns. He drove over $16,000 worth of
mileage for his campaign – potentially over 32,000 miles – while also serving as
Ashland County DA. Duffy was ultimately reimbursed over $50,000 for his
campaign, including over $43,000 for travel expenses. Though he criticized the bank
bailout, Duffy accepted nearly $30,000 from employees and PACs of bailed out
banks. Duffy raised over $1,000,000 from PACs, including $20,000 from Koch
Industries’ PAC.
Drove Over $16,000 Worth of Mileage While Acting As Ashland County District Attorney
Though he resigned as Ashland County DA in June 2010, Duffy drove over $16,239.21 worth in mileage
for his campaign up to and including the date of his resignation. [Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Date
9/30/09
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
2/16/10
3/12/10
3/31/10
5/10/10
6/18/10
Amount
$2,385.30
$4,779.45
$76.46
$306.49
$241.91
$1,263.60
$1,497.52
$1,432.40
$2,394.08
$1,862.00
Description
In-kind - mileage, to be reimbursed (See*
Other: Candidate Mileage
mileage reimbursement
mileage reimbursement
Mileage
Other: Candidate Mileage
Mileage
Mileage
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
250
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
TOTAL
$16,239.21
[fec.gov, accessed 10/19/11]
NOTE: It is unclear how much of the last mileage reimbursement was for mileage incurred prior to his
June 4 resignation. However, Duffy stayed on as DA through the end of June.
*NOTE: While there is no evidence that Duffy was eventually reimbursed this amount, the fact that this
request for reimbursement exists implies that Duffy was driving an amount worth $2,385.30 in
reimbursements.
… Which Duffy Did Not Challenge
In 2010, the Lassa campaign determined that Duffy’s campaign had reimbursed him $13,712 for
campaign-related travel, which at 50 cents a mile meant that he had traveled 27,422.
Duffy said the figure was accurate, saying “I’m working my tail off here.” [Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel, 10/13/10]
NOTE: It is unclear how the Lassa campaign computed their number.
Did Duffy Drive Over 32,000 Miles for Campaign While Serving As DA?
At a generous reimbursement rate of 50 cents per mile, Duffy would have to travel 32,478 miles
between announcing his campaign in July 2009 and resigning as County DA in June 2010.
[Marshfield News, 7/08/09; Associated Press, 6/05/10]
At that rate, Duffy would have to drive 2,706 miles each month, equivalent to 90 miles each day.
NOTE: Reimbursement rate based on IRS’ 2011 standard mileage rate of 51 cents per mile for
business miles driven.
Reimbursed Over $50,000 By His Campaign
Since announcing his run for Congress in 2009, Duffy has been reimbursed $59,613.87 by his campaign:
Date
7/01/09
7/08/09
7/17/09
7/24/09
7/26/09
7/31/09
8/03/09
8/07/09
8/08/09
8/10/09
Amount
$500.00
$152.36
$1,610.00
$306.80
$139.99
$25.89
$12.66
$243.58
$75.96
$16.33
Description
In-kind - Logo, to be reimbursed (See Sc*
In-kind - Hotel expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - Logo, to be reimbursed (See Sc*
In-kind - Balloons, to be reimbursed (Se*
In-kind - Printer, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - postage, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - t-shirts, to be reimbursed (Se*
In-kind - Camera, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - balloon helium, to be reimburse*
In-kind - postage, to be reimbursed (See*
251
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
8/10/09
8/12/09
8/16/09
8/18/09
9/02/09
9/02/09
9/10/09
9/12/09
9/16/09
9/18/09
9/20/09
9/24/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
2/16/10
3/12/10
3/12/10
3/31/10
4/06/10
5/10/10
6/18/10
7/13/10
7/19/10
8/02/10
10/09/10
11/29/10
1/17/11
1/17/11
2/04/11
2/04/11
2/10/11
2/10/11
3/11/11
3/22/11
4/22/11
6/15/11
6/22/11
7/25/11
10/24/11
11/24/11
$49.88
$288.15
$445.32
$312.71
$66.28
$9.19
$28.75
$55.13
$161.74
$70.69
$614.25
$367.40
$55.62
$2,308.84
$3,707.63
$4,779.45
$76.46
$306.49
$241.91
$1,263.60
$4,134.45
$1,497.52
$1,432.40
$3,419.79
$2,394.08
$1,862.00
$2,000.00
$660.00
$2,279.50
$4,407.50
$2,686.00
$1,180.50
$153.00
$1,022.40
$609.00
$934.79
$727.50
$220.50
$72.70
$527.28
$676.50
$537.64
$734.40
$1,414.74
$2,297.78
In-kind - postage, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - Printing, to be reimbursed (Se*
In-kind - Phone expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - bumper stickers, to be reimbur*
In-kind - Ink, to be reimbursed (See Sch*
In-kind - postage, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - Postage, to be reimbursed (See*
In-kind - Hotel expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - phone expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - t-shirts, to be reimbursed (Se*
In-kind - hotel/meal expense, to be reim*
In-kind - bumper stickers, to be reimbur*
Reimbursement of candidate expenses**
Reimbursement of candidate expenses**
Other: Candidate Reimbursements**
Other: Candidate Mileage
mileage reimbursement
mileage reimbursement
mileage
Other: Candidate Mileage
Other: candidate reimbursement**
mileage
Mileage
Other: Candidate Travel
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: candidate travel reimbursement
Other: postage reimbursement
Other: candidate travel reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursement
Administrative/Salary/Overhead: Mileage
Reimbursement**
Travel: Expense reimbursement
Travel: Expense Reimbursement
Travel: Travel Reimbursment
Mileage Reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursment
Travel: Reimbursment
Travel: hotel stay and reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: travel reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
252
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
12/17/11
1/18/12
3/05/12
3/05/12
TOTAL
$618.24
$572.40
$1,295.52
$952.68
$59,613.87
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: travel reimbursment
Travel: reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
[fec.gov, accessed 5/03/12]
*NOTE: Duffy was later reimbursed for these expenses on 10/15/09.
**NOTE: It is unclear what these reimbursements were for.
… Including Over $43,000 for Travel
Since announcing his run for Congress in 2009, Duffy has been paid $43,863.01 for travel
expenses by his campaign:
Date
7/08/09
9/12/09
9/20/09
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
2/16/10
3/12/10
3/31/10
4/06/10
5/10/10
6/18/10
7/13/10
8/02/10
10/09/10
11/29/10
1/17/11
2/04/11
2/04/11
2/10/11
2/10/11
3/11/11
3/22/11
4/22/11
6/15/11
6/22/11
7/25/11
Amount
$152.36
$55.13
$614.25
$4,779.45
$76.46
$306.49
$241.91
$1,263.60
$1,497.52
$1,432.40
$3,419.79
$2,394.08
$1,862.00
$2,000.00
$2,279.50
$4,407.50
$2,686.00
$1,180.50
$1,022.40
$609.00
$934.79
$727.50
$220.50
$72.70
$527.28
$676.50
$537.64
$734.40
Description
In-kind - Hotel expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - Hotel expense, to be reimburse*
In-kind - hotel/meal expense, to be reim*
Other: Candidate Mileage
mileage reimbursement
mileage reimbursement
mileage
Other: Candidate Mileage
mileage
Mileage
Other: Candidate Travel
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: candidate travel reimbursement
Other: candidate travel reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursement
Administrative/Salary/Overhead: Mileage
Travel: Expense reimbursement
Travel: Expense Reimbursement
Travel: Travel Reimbursment
Mileage Reimbursement
Travel: Mileage Reimbursment
Travel: Reimbursment
Travel: hotel stay and reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: travel reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
253
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
10/24/11
11/24/11
12/17/11
1/18/12
3/05/12
3/05/12
TOTAL
$1,414.74
$2,297.78
$618.24
$572.40
$1,295.52
$952.68
$43,863.01
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
Travel: travel reimbursment
Travel: reimbursement
Travel: mileage reimbursement
[fec.gov, accessed 5/03/12]
Criticized Bank Bailout and Wanted to Stop TARP Spending
In 2009, Duffy criticized the bank bailout. [Stevens Point Journal, 4/23/10]
And according to his 2010 campaign website, Duffy wanted to stop TARP spending after October 3,
2010. [duffyforcongress.com, accessed 8/15/11]
… But Accepted Nearly $30,000 from Employees and PACs of Bailed Out Banks
As of 2011, Duffy accepted $29,675.00 in campaign donations from employees and PACs of
bailed out banks:
Date
9/23/09
12/14/09
1/26/10
2/16/10
2/25/10
3/30/10
3/31/10
3/31/10
4/15/10
4/29/10
5/25/10
6/02/10
6/22/10
7/15/10
7/15/10
8/19/10
8/30/10
10/07/10
10/08/10
10/15/10
10/16/10
10/21/10
10/22/10
Name
Todd Nicklaus
Michael Mahoney
Roy Haasis
Steven Anderson
Roy Haasis
Roy Haasis
Steven Anderson
Don Taylor
Michael Solberg
Roy Haasis
Roy Haasis
Roy Haasis
Tyler Tomesh
Todd Nicklaus
Todd Nicklaus
Robert Atwell
Roy Haasis
Don Taylor
Michael Sabloff
John Evans
Roy Haasis
Robert Atwell
Michael Solberg
Employer
River Valley State Bank
Park Bank
Morgan Stanley
River Valley Bank
Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley
River Valley Bank
Waukesha State Bank
State Bank & Trust
Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley
Wells Fargo Bank
River Valley State Bank
River Valley State Bank
Nicolet National Bank
Morgan Stanley
Waukesha State Bank
JP Morgan
Associated Bank
Morgan Stanley
Nicolet National Bank
State Bank & Trust
254
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Amount
$500.00
$500.00
$200.00
$225.00
$200.00
$200.00
$250.00
$250.00
$500.00
$200.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500.00
$400.00
$600.00
$500.00
$200.00
$750.00
$250.00
$500.00
$400.00
$500.00
$500.00
10/22/10
11/01/10
11/02/10
11/02/10
3/23/11
3/23/11
3/27/11
5/16/11
5/23/11
5/23/11
6/16/11
6/24/11
6/30/11
6/30/11
7/31/11
8/01/11
8/18/11
9/28/11
9/30/10
Don Taylor
JP Morgan Chase & Co. PAC
Richard McCormack
David Stein
John Evans
Todd Nicklaus
Roy Haasis
The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. PAC
JP Morgan Chase & Co. PAC
Wells Fargo & Co. Employee
PAC
Thomas Ferrell
Maura Solomon
Bank of America Corporation
State & Fed
Citigroup Inc. PAC
Robert Atwell
The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. PAC
Todd Nicklaus
Don Taylor
The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. PAC
Waukesha State Bank
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Associated Bank
Associated Bank
River Valley State Bank
Morgan Stanley
-
$250.00
$5,000.00
$1,000.00
$250.00
$250.00
$500.00
$600.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
Peoples State Bank
Citigroup
$250.00
$250.00
$500.00
Nicolet National Bank
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
River Valley State Bank
Waukesha State Bank
$500.00
$1,600.00
$1,000.00
TOTAL
$29,675.00
[fec.gov, 10/21/11; Bailout Recipients, projects.propublica.org]
Accepted $20,000 from Koch Industries
As of March 2012, Duffy has accepted $20,000 from Koch Industries’ PAC. [Center for Responsive Politics,
updated 5/03/12]
Raised Nearly $1,000,000 from PACs
The following outlines Duffy’s PAC-versus-individual donations:
Source of Funds
Individual Contributions
PAC Contributions
Candidate self-financing
Other
Amount
$2,199,142
$1,133,080
0
$30,101
Percentage
65%
34%
0%
1%
[Center for Responsive Politics, updated 5/03/12]
… But Touted His Fundraising from Wisconsin Residents
In 2010, Duffy touted his fundraising from individual donors from Wisconsin.
255
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Criticizing his Democratic opponent’s fundraising, Duffy said, “Most of his $ comes from liberal
PACs and unions. In the last fundraising cycle, I believe that more than 80% of his money came
from PACS and outside of the state. We had a great quarter and nearly 100% of our money came
from individual donors, mostly in state.” [Duffy RedState interview, 1/13/10]
PAC Donations Largely Came from Business Interests
The following outlines the groups that composed Duffy’s PAC donations:
PAC Sector
Business
Ideological/Single Issue
Labor
Amount
$680,918
$315,159
$3,000
[Center for Responsive Politics, accessed 5/03/12]
Accepted $45,000 from Republican Leadership
As of 2011, Duffy has accepted at $113,500 from major Republican leadership PACs:
Name
ERICPAC
PETEPAC
The Freedom Project
Prosperity PAC
Majority Committee PAC
Continuing a Majority
PAC
GOP Generation Y Fund
Member
Eric Cantor
Pete Session
John Boehner
Paul Ryan
Kevin McCarthy
Dave Camp
Amount
$20,000
$5,000
$20,000
$20,000
$18,500
$15,000
Aaron Schock
TOTAL
$15,000
$113,500
[fec.gov, accessed 5/03/12]
Top Individual Contributors
The following outlines Duffy’s top individual contributors:
Industry
Wausau Homes
Johnson Timber
Grassland Dairy
First Impressions
Roehl Transport
Marshfield Clinic
Every Republican is Crucial PAC
Freedom Project
Koch Industries
Amount
$39,100
$34,400
$29,400
$25,950
$24,900
$23,689
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
256
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Prosperity PAC
Wausau-Mosinee Paper
Majority Cmte PAC
American Bankers Assn
County Materials
Greenheck Fan Corp
Windway Capital
Continuing a Majority Party Action
Cmte
GOP Generation Y Fund
Home Depot
Independent Community Bankers of
America
PricewaterhouseCoopers
$20,000
$19,400
$18,500
$18,000
$17,700
$17,550
$16,800
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
[Center for Responsive Politics, updated 5/03/12]
Top Industry Contributors
The following outlines Duffy’s top contributors by industry:
Industry
Leadership PACs
Retired
Health Professionals
Insurance
Commercial Banks
Misc Manufacturing & Distributing
Securities & Investment
Forestry & Forest Products
Real Estate
Dairy
Misc Finance
Home Builders
Republican/Conservative
Accountants
Oil & Gas
Retail Sales
Candidate Committees
General Contractors
Lawyers/Law Firms
Trucking
Amount
$237,453
$195,301
$153,596
$101,312
$92,908
$86,724
$70,050
$67,550
$67,400
$55,300
$54,550
$54,300
$52,950
$50,389
$47,450
$45,200
$41,056
$40,133
$39,434
$37,950
[Center for Responsive Politics, updated 5/03/12]
Failed to Report Cost of Running TV Ads
257
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
In 2010, Duffy’s campaign failed to report $17,335 on his campaign spending report that the campaign
spent on running television ads. [Marshfield News, 7/22/10]
No Evidence Duffy Fundraised for County DA Election
Since winning election as County DA in 2002, Duffy never filed a campaign fundraising report with the
state of Wisconsin. [Wisconsin Campaign Finance Information System, accessed 10/13/11]
258
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Appendix III – Outstanding Questions
Items of Interest
 Did Duffy just move into a new expensive home?
 Did Duffy drive over 32,000 miles for campaign while also serving as
County DA?
 Who did Duffy represent in private practice?
 Did Duffy start a business with his brother?
 What are Duffy’s assets and liabilities?
There are a number of questions that this research project has been unable to
answer. Did Duffy just move into a new expensive home? Did Duffy drive over
32,000 miles for his campaign while also serving as County DA? Who did Duffy
represent in private practice? Did Duffy start a business with his brother? What are
Duffy’s assets and liabilities?
Did Duffy Just Move Into An Expensive Home?
In October 2011, Duffy may have moved to an expensive new home in Weston, Wisconsin:
Public Records Search Indicated That Duffy Recently Moved to 5805 Pine Terrace in
Weston
According to a public records search, as of October 2011, Duffy is located at 5805 Pine Terrace in
Weston, Wisconsin 54476. [Nexis Public Records search, accessed 11/15/11; Marathon County Land Records,
accessed 11/15/11]
NOTE: Nexis indicates that the property is located in Schofield, however Marathon County Land
Records indicates that the property is located in Weston.
… Which Is Partly Matched by News Coverage
In October 2011, the Wausau Daily Herald reported that Duffy moved to Weston that
month. [Wausau Daily Herald, 10/13/11]
259
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
NOTE: No further information was found indicating where in Weston the Duffy family
lives.
Photograph Suggests Duffy At Least Lived Near 5805 Pine Terrace
The following is a photograph of 5805 Pine Terrace:
[bing.com, accessed 11/15/11]
According to a recent Duffy Halloween picture, the back to 5805 Pine Terrace was clearly visible:
260
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[facebook.com, uploaded 10/30/11]
NOTE: It is unclear why the Duffys are standing in the driveway of the home next to 5805 Pine
Terrace.
FOLLOW-UP: Is Duffy’s New Home Worth Nearly 70 Percent More Than Previous Home?
As of 2010, the total value of 5805 Pine Terrace was $366,100.00. [Parcel #62-0659-000-040-00-00,
Marathon County Land Records, accessed 11/15/11]
By contrast, as of 2010, the total value of Duffy’s previous property at 2906 City Heights Road in
Ashland was $215,700. [Ashland County Assessor, Parcel #201-4834-0000, accessed 11/15/11]
… And Is Duffy’s New Home Nearly Twice As Big As Midwest Homes?
According to Realtor.com, the size of 5805 Pine Terrace was 3,981 square feet. [realtor.com,
accessed 11/16/11]
According to the US Census Bureau, the average square feet for single-family houses in
the Midwest was 2,265 as of 2010 – almost half the size of the Pine Terrace home.
[census.gov, accessed 11/16/11]
FLASHBACK: Duffy’s Previous Home in Ashland Was Worth Over Twice The Home
Before That
In 2004, when Duffy purchased his home at 2906 City Heights Road in Ashland, the property’s
total value was $215,700.
261
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Duffy’s previous home at 512 Beaser Avenue in Ashland had, as of 2004, a total value of $87,400
– less than half the value of Duffy’s new home. [Ashland County Assessor, Parcel #201-4834-0000 and
#201-0401-0000, accessed 11/09/11]
Did Duffy Drive Over 32,000 Miles for Campaign While Serving As DA?
At a generous reimbursement rate of 50 cents per mile, Duffy would have to travel 32,478 miles between
announcing his campaign in July 2009 and resigning as County DA in June 2010. [Marshfield News, 7/08/09;
Associated Press, 6/05/10]
At that rate, Duffy would have to drive 2,706 miles each month, equivalent to 90 miles each day.
NOTE: Reimbursement rate based on IRS’ 2011 standard mileage rate of 51 cents per mile for business
miles driven.
Drove Over $16,000 Worth of Mileage While Acting As Ashland County District Attorney
Though he resigned as Ashland County DA in June 2010, Duffy drove $16,239.21 worth of
mileage for his campaign, up to and including the date of his resignation. [Associated Press, 6/05/10]
Date
9/30/09
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
1/03/10
2/16/10
3/12/10
3/31/10
5/10/10
6/18/10
TOTAL
Amount
$2,385.30
$4,779.45
$76.46
$306.49
$241.91
$1,263.60
$1,497.52
$1,432.40
$2,394.08
$1,862.00
$16,239.21
Description
In-kind - mileage, to be reimbursed (See*
Other: Candidate Mileage
mileage reimbursement
mileage reimbursement
Mileage
Other: Candidate Mileage
Mileage
Mileage
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
Travel: Candidate Mileage Reimbursemen
[fec.gov, accessed 10/19/11]
NOTE: It is unclear how much of the last mileage reimbursement was for mileage incurred prior
to his June 4 resignation. However, Duffy stayed on as DA through the end of June.
*NOTE: While there is no evidence that Duffy was eventually reimbursed this amount, that it
exists implies that Duffy was driving an amount worth $2,385.30 in reimbursements.
… Which Duffy Did Not Challenge
In 2010, the Lassa campaign determined that Duffy’s campaign had reimbursed him $13,712 for
campaign-related travel, which at 50 cents a mile meant that he had traveled 27,422.
Duffy said the figure was accurate, saying “I’m working my tail off here.” [Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel, 10/13/10]
262
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
Who Did Duffy Represent in Private Practice?
Between 1999 and 2000, Duffy practiced law as an Associate Attorney in his father’s law offices, Thomas
Duffy Law Offices, in Hayward.
Duffy described his Associate Attorney’s portfolio as general law practice, specifically advising family,
criminal, and real estate matters. [Duffy Resume from Application to Parole Advisory Board, 2003; Central Wisconsin
Sunday, 11/07/10]
Then in 2002, Duffy ran his own law firm, Duffy Law Practices. [Associated Press, 6/03/02]
In 2010, after resigning as District Attorney for Ashland County, Duffy returned to his family’s law
practice. [Associated Press, 6/04/10]
NOTE: No further information regarding Duffy’s clients were found.
ALSO NOTE: Wisconsin’s court system does not provide for case searches by attorney.
Did Duffy Start A Business With His Brother?
In 2003, Duffy and his brother Patrick secured financing from the Chippewa Valley Bank,
using a 1999 Skyline B202CT as collateral. [UCC Financing Statement, File No. 030014532924, 9/03/03]
The financing was terminated less than a year later. [UCC Financing Statement Amendment, File No.
040003532417, 3/03/04]
NOTE: No further records indicate how much financing was secured, or what it was for.
What Are Duffy’s Assets?
The following outlines issues concerning Duffy’s assets:
Where’s the Money? Missing Investments on Duffy’s Form B Disclosure
Though Duffy’s form A financial disclosure covered his investments from January 1, 2010
through May 15th, 2010, and his form B disclosure covered Duffy’s investments through all of
2010, there were investments on form A that did not appear on form B.
Specifically the following investments did not appear on Duffy’s form B disclosure:
Name
Wells Fargo Checking
Wells Fargo Checking
Northern State Bank
Savings Account
DFA US Micro Cap Fund
Value
$1,001-$15,000
$1-$1,000
Type
Interest
Interest
Current
$1-$200
$1-$200
Preceding
$1-$200
$1-$200
None
Interest
None
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
Dividends
None
None
263
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
VGI EAFE Equity Index
Collective T
Fidelity Contra Fund
Vanguard Target
Retirement 2045 Fund
TOTAL
None
None
$1,001-$15,000
Capital
Gains
Dividends
$1-$200
$1-$200
$1,001-$15,000
None
None
None
$3-$600
$4-$800
$1,001-$15,000
$109,010-$385,000
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
Where’s the Money Again? Missing Income on Duffy’s Form B Disclosure
Though Duffy’s form A disclosure indicated that certain investments generated income, Duffy’s
later form B indicated that none of his investments generated income.
Specifically, the following investments generated income during 2010 on Form A but not on Form
B:
Form
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Investment
Federal US Government Securities 2-5 Year
Def Comp – Federated US Gov’t Securities
Vanguard Admiral Treasury Money Market
Def Comp – Vanguard Admiral Treasury
Capital Income Builder Fund LLA
IRA – Capital Income Builder A
Eaton Vance Large Cap Core Fund CLL
IRA – Eaton Vance Large*
Eaton Vance Growth Fund Trust Worldwide
Health Science FDL
IRA – Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Science
FD
Type of
Income
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Dividends
None
Current
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
$1-$200
None
Dividends
$1-$200
None
None
[2010 Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
*NOTE: Duffy’s Form A disclosure has two Eaton Vance “Large Cap Core” investments, while his Form
B disclosure has one “Large Cap Core Value” investment and another “Large Core Value” investment –
neither of which appears to clearly correspond.
Who Has the Money? Forms Indicate Different Owners Same Investment
According to Duffy’s Form A disclosure, Growth Fund of America CLA was one of his personal
investments, worth between $1,001 and $15,000. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
However, according to his form B disclosure, Growth Fund of America CLA was one of his
wife’s investments, worth between $1,001 and $15,000. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
What Are Duffy’s Liabilities?
264
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
The following outlines issues concerning Duffy’s liabilities:
Where’s the Money? Home Mortgage Missing from Form B
Though Duffy reported a home mortgage on his Form A financial disclosure, he does not report
the mortgage on his Form B disclosure. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
NOTE: It is possible that Duffy paid off his home mortgage by the end of 2010, thereby
eliminating the need for him to report it as a debt on the Form B disclosure.
Where’s the Money? Credit Card Missing from Form A
Though Duffy reported on his Form B disclosure that he and his wife have jointly had a Bank of
America credit card from 2000, he failed to report the card on his earlier form A disclosure. [2010
Personal Financial Disclosures - Forms A and B]
Who Has the Money? Forms Indicate Different Owners Same Liability
According to Duffy’s Form A disclosure, he personally held the mortgage on his Iron River
property. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form A]
However, according to his form B disclosure, he and his wife jointly held the mortgage on the Iron
River property. [2010 Personal Financial Disclosure - Form B]
What Happened To Over $5,600 in Unaccounted Reimbursements to Duffy?
Between September and December 2009, Duffy had $5,297.50 in unaccounted reimbursements:
Date
9/13/09
9/30/09
10/03/09
10/09/09
10/13/09
10/14/09
10/19/09
10/22/09
10/27/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
11/06/09
11/11/09
11/12/09
11/19/09
11/30/09
12/01/09
Amount
$55.13
$2,385.30
$221.70
$36.92
$4.95
$4.95
$126.66
$55.63
$71.34
$170.64
$711.59
$80.56
$20.00
$6.00
$42.20
$170.65
$104.45
Description
In-kind - Hotel expense, to be reimburse
In-kind - mileage, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Phone equipment, to be reimbur
In-kind - Postage, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Postage, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Rally signs, to be reimbursed
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Phone bill, to be reimbursed (
In-kind - Bumper stickers, to be reimbur
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Parking, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Parking, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - T-shirts, to be reimbursed (Se
In-kind - Phone bill, to be reimbursed (
In-kind - GPS, to be reimbursed (See Sch
265
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/04/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/16/09
12/16/09
12/17/09
12/22/09
12/30/09
TOTAL
$76.25
$88.00
$75.81
$79.57
$76.27
$105.49
$202.53
$110.26
$44.00
$170.65
$5,297.50
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Postage, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Data card, to be reimbursed (S
In-kind - Printer, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Candidate travel, to be reimbu
In-kind - Stamps, to be reimbursed (See
In-kind - Phone bill, to be reimbursed (
[fec.gov, accessed 10/19/11]
NOTE: No records were found indicating whether Duffy was actually reimbursed for these expenses, only
that he would be reimbursed.
Was Duffy Taking Homestead Exemption in Bayfield County… While Serving As DA in Ashland
County?
In 2004, Duffy and his wife bought a vacant property at 29980 Carlson Road in Eileen, WI. [Parcels #0201025-09, #020-1026-01, #020-1026-02; Mortgage, Document #2004R-494783, Bayfield County, 9/30/04]
According to the 2004 warranty deed for the property, it was considered a “homestead property.” [Warranty
Deed, Document #2004R-494782, Bayfield County, 9/30/04]
But at the time, Duffy was serving as District Attorney for Ashland County. [Duffy Resume from Application
to Parole Advisory Board, 2003; Associated Press, 6/05/10]
The Duffys then split ownership of the property with Patrick Duffy in 2005. [Quit Claim Deed, Document
#2005R-499061, Bayfield County, 5/02/05]
The group then sold the property to Mark and Elizabeth Mackey in 2005. [Warranty Deed, Document #2005R499062, Bayfield County, 5/04/04]
NOTE: It is possible that the property was considered “homestead property” for the previous owner, and
ceased to be so when it was transferred to the Duffys.
266
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012
[bing.com, accessed 9/01/11]
267
Sean Duffy DCCC Research Book Last Updated May 2, 2012