Beyond grapheme-phoneme correspondences

advertisement

Morphology and spelling

Peter Bryant and Terezinha Nunes

Unputdownable morphemes

Morphemes are units of meaning and many words are constructed from more than one morpheme

1. glad

2.

gladly, gladness

3.

4.

read put readable put down unreadable putdownable unputdownable

The spelling of affix morphemes (ly, -ness, able ) is highly consistent and therefore regular in

English as well as in other languages

Conditional morphological spelling rules exist in many orthographies (French, English, Greek,

Portuguese, Hebrew, Arabic) when:

 the same sound is spelled in different ways fox sock s educat ion

δίνω magic ian

νερό

 different sounds are spelled in the same way cat s dog s heal heal th

 spelling represents morphemic distinctions that aren’t represented in speech la maison les maison s

The boys drink The boy

’s drink

bins

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Phonemes, not morphemes, in invented spelling

(substitution for past verb “ed” ending)

 halpt

 likt helped liked

 kild

 watid

 wotid killed waited wanted

Charles Read, 1986

“s” or “z” for plurals in invented spelling

 onges

 boxis oranges boxes

 pnnez

 disaz

 owsenz pennies dishes oceans

Charles Read, 1986

Spelling the endings of /d/ and /t/ non-verbs

/d/ ending /t/ ending bird cold field belt except next gold paint ground soft

Nunes, Bryant & Bindman

Mean correct phonetic spellings of non-verbs ending in /d/ or /t/ (out of 10) in 3 sessions over a period of 21 months

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

6yr5m 7yr5m

Nunes, Bryant & Bindman

8yr7m start

7m later

21m later

N=297

Spelling the endings of regular past verbs with

/d/ and /t/ inflections

/d/ ending /t/ ending called dressed covered kissed filled killed opened laughed learned stopped

10

9

6

5

8

7

4

3

2

1

0

Mean correct “-ed” spellings (out of 10) in 3 sessions over a period of 21 months

6yr5m 7yr5m 8yr7m start

7m later

21m later

N=297

Nunes, Bryant & Bindman

Phonetic endings instead of the correct

“-ed” ending

Number of incorrect

 most of the mistakes with regular verb endings are phonetic transcriptions: e.g.

“ kist

” for “ kissed

 these inappropriate phonetic transcriptions are made even by some 10 year olds phonetic transcriptions of regular verb endings

3

2

1

0

5

4

10

9

8

7

6

6 7 8 9 10

Generalisations and overgeneralisations of the

“-ed” ending

 many children put “-eds” on the ends of irregular past verbs ( sleped ) (71%), and also of non-verbs

( sofed, necsed ) (59%) as well as of regular past verbs ( kissed )

 the generalisation to irregular verbs is incorrect but grammatically appropriate

 the generalisation to non-verbs is incorrect and inappropriate grammatically

Nunes, Bryant & Bindman

Incorrect generalisations of the “ed” ending to irregular verbs “sleped” & to non-verbs “necsed”

 at first the children make the two types of generalisation roughly equally

 but by 8 yrs they make many more generalisations to irregular verbs than to non-verbs

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

6yr s

8yr s

10yr s to nonverbs to irreg vbs

Nunes, Bryant & Bindman

/d/ and /t/ endings are spelled as “d” and “t” grapheme-phoneme rule

/d/ and /t/ endings are sometimes spelled as “d” and “t” and sometimes as “ed” extension of grapheme-phoneme rule

“ed” endings are for past verbs:

“d” and “t” endings are for everything else morpho-phonemic rule

20

10

0

50

40

30

100

90

80

70

60

The –ion ending: how 880 children spelled four words with the “-t-ion” ending: percent correct election destination combination emotion

7 to 8 8 to 9 9 to 10 10 to 11

Sound in real word stems

Sound in real word inflections

/o/sound

τόπι(ball)

φωνή(voice)

νερό(water)

δίνω(I give)

μιλάμε(we talk) παιδί(child)

/i/ sound

μήλο(apple) πόλη(town)

μιλάμε (we talk)

δίνω (I give)

φιλώ (I kiss)

ρίχνομαι (I fly into)

ψήνει (s/he cooks)

μήλο (apple)

κήποι (gardens)

νησί (island)

κλείνομαι (I am shut up in)

θείοι (uncles)

δείχνουμε (we show)

πειράζει (s/he teases)

τόπι (ball)

παιδί (child)

βόδι (ox)

νησί (island)

ζώνη (waistband)

πόλη (town)

θέση (place/seat)

φωνή (voice)

ψήνει (s/he cooks)

δένει (s/he ties)

πειράζει (s/he teases)

κοιτάζει (s/he looks at)

κοιμάμαι (I sleep)

τοίχοι (walls)

κοιτάζει (s/he looks at)

ανοίγουμε (we open)

τοίχοι (walls)

θείοι (uncles)

κήποι (gardens)

καιροί (days/times)

θότι

νεπί

σόβι

κιφί

λόχη

κόση

ρέκη

βοπή

πέφει

γίβει

σιφάγει

διπάγει

λίροι

μίοι

νίγοι

σεποί

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

32

30

28

26

24

22

20

18

Session A (Mean age:

6y10m)

Session B (Mean age:

7y6m)

Real Word Stems

Real Word Inflections

Pseudoword Inflections

Session C (Mean age:

8y6m)

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2008

Answer to first question

The conditional rules are seriously and persistently difficult for a lot of children

The degree of difficulty may vary from script to script

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Not enough explicit morphological awareness?

Several studies with English speaking children show a relationship between children’s morphological awareness and their use of conventional spelling for inflections

We ourselves have used 2 main tasks to establish this relationship

Two morphological awareness tasks

Sentence analogy: Word analogy:

Tom helps Mary

Tom helped Mary

Tom sees Mary

_____________ teacher taught writer ______ walk walked shake ______

Word analogy predicts correct use of “ed” 7 months later:

Outcome measure - spelling “ed”s 7 months after the 1st session

Word analogy in 1st session

4. 0%

Nunes, Bryant,

& Bindman

Spelling “ed”s in

1st session

8.0%

IQ

11.1%

Age

13.8%

How general is the link?

Several researchers have found this predictive relationship in English-speaking children (e.g. Kirby

& Deacon in Canada) and it seems to be true of

Israeli (Levin) and Brazilian (Rego) children too

 It is likely that it’s a 2-way street (Levin; \Nunes &

Bryant)

But it may not be true of orthographies in which spelling is not conditional on morphology e.g.

Finnish

A test of spelling geminates and consonant clusters given to Finnish 7-year olds

Geminates Clusters

Stem prinseSSaksi kimaLLukseksi  harraSTuksena puhaLTamiseksi 

Inflection tilaisuudeSSa kumppaniLLa 

älykkyydeSTä lasketteluLTa 

This task was given to the children at mean age 7 yrs (Time 1) and 5 months later at mean age 7yrs 5m (Time 2)

Lehtonen & Bryant, 2005

Morphological awareness and spelling geminates

& clusters

At Time 1 & 2 we also gave the children a Finnish version of Berko’s Wug task, devised by Lyytinen

(1988)

We used the adverb, comparative and past tense subtests

Our question was whether these scores would predict spelling of inflections more than of stems

There was no difference: the correlation between the morphological test at Time 1 and spelling at Time 2 was .48 for stem spelling and .41 for inflection spelling

Answer to second question

Children may ignore morphological spelling rules because they are not explicitly aware enough of morphological categories and morphological distinctions

 It’s likely that they concentrate on phonology instead because that’s what they’re taught about

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Three questions

Do children have particular difficulty in conforming to these morphemic rules in spelling?

What causes these difficulties?

Do children overcome these difficulties by learning about morphemic spelling rules or in some other way?

Morphemic spelling rules exist

……..

But do people who eventually learn to spell words using the conventional spellings for morphemes actually know and use the rules?

The alternative is that they learn the specific spelling of each word (“word specific” or “lexical” learning), or that they learn about a set of specific sequences

The acid test is to present children with pseudo words which have an obvious morphemic structure e.g. “Yesterday I /bopt/ along the road as I went to school”

A study of Greek children’s learning of how to spell vowel sounds in inflections and in stems

The best evidence that children actually learn morphemic spelling rules comes from Greek

Greek is a highly regular orthography as far as reading is concerned

Spelling is less predictable because there are very few vowel sounds in Greek, and more than one way of spelling three of the vowels

 e.g. /i/ is represented by:

ι , η

,

ει, οι

/o/ is represented by:

ο , ω

/e/ is represented by:

ε , αι

μιλάμε (we talk)

δίνω (I give)

φιλώ (I kiss)

ρίχνομαι (I fly into)

ψήνει (s/he cooks)

μήλο (apple)

κήποι (gardens)

νησί (island)

κλείνομαι (I am shut up in)

θείοι (uncles)

δείχνουμε (we show)

πειράζει (s/he teases)

τόπι (ball)

παιδί (child)

βόδι (ox)

νησί (island)

ζώνη (waistband)

πόλη (town)

θέση (place/seat)

φωνή (voice)

ψήνει (s/he cooks)

δένει (s/he ties)

πειράζει (s/he teases)

κοιτάζει (s/he looks at)

κοιμάμαι (I sleep)

τοίχοι (walls)

κοιτάζει (s/he looks at)

ανοίγουμε (we open)

τοίχοι (walls)

θείοι (uncles)

κήποι (gardens)

καιροί (days/times)

θότι

νεπί

σόβι

κιφί

λόχη

κόση

ρέκη

βοπή

πέφει

γίβει

σιφάγει

διπάγει

λίροι

μίοι

νίγοι

σεποί

Sound in real word stems

Sound in real word inflections

Sound in pseudoword inflections

νερό(water) βεσό

/o/sound

τόπι(ball)

φωνή(voice) δίνω(I give) λιβώ

μιλάμε(we talk) παιδί(child)

/i/ sound

μήλο(apple) πόλη(town)

θότι

ρέκη

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

32

30

28

26

24

22

20

18

Session A (Mean age:

6y10m)

Session B (Mean age:

7y6m)

Real Word Stems

Real Word Inflections

Pseudoword Inflections

Session C (Mean age:

8y6m)

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2008

Number of children (out of 90) significantly above chance level (+) or not (-) with real word inflections

(RW) and pseudo-word inflections (PW)

Session A Session B Session C

RW-PW35

RW+PW30

RW-PW+ 0

RW+PW+ 25

10

23

1

56

3

17

0

70

Chance level .375: 18+/32 above chance level

Real word inflections

Session A

.434**

Pseudoword inflections

-.036

Session B

Real word inflections

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Real word inflections

Session A

.434**

Pseudoword inflections

-.036

Session B

Real word inflections

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Real word inflections

Session B

.390**

Pseudoword inflections

-.010

Session C

Real word inflections

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Real word inflections

Session B

.390**

Pseudoword inflections

-.010

Session C

Real word inflections

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Real word stems

Session A

.146

Pseudoword inflections

.172

Session B

Real word stems

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Real word stems

Session B

.253

Pseudoword inflections

.197

Session C

Real word stems

Pseudoword inflections

Chliounaki & Bryant, 2007

Conclusions from the Chliounaki & Bryant study

Children get to spell inflections correctly in real words before pseudowords

Cross lagged correlations between real and pseudoword spelling of inflections suggest a causal connection:

It is that word specific learning lays the basis for inferring the morphemic spelling rules

So what about learning English morphemic spelling rules?

Do English-speaking children learn the morphemic spelling rule for the plural?

 In English the last sound in “buns” and “dogs” is

/z/ but it is spelled as “s” because “s” is the spelling for the plural morpheme in English

 Since children don’t often write “dogz” (Treiman,

Read) it is possible that young children at least know the morphological rule for “s” as the plural ending

However, there is also a frequency rule: in almost every word that ends in a /z/ sound which is preceded by a consonant the /z/ ending is spelled as “s” (e.g.“dogs”)

 but when the /z/ ending is preceded by a vowel sound, as in “trees” “freeze” “please”, the ending is as likely to be “ze” or “se” as “s”

The children saw two ________ at school today.

The children saw two ________ at school today.

The children saw two pleens at school today.

The children saw two prees at school today.

Percent of children’s “-s” spellings of the /z/ sound at the end of plural words and pseudowords

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 fibs trees

Real plural words pleens prees

Plural pseudo-words

Kemp & Bryant, 2003

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Adults’ “-s” spellings of the /z/ sound at the end of plural pseudo-words

Educational Levels

Secondary

Tertiary pleens prees

Kemp & Bryant, 2003

/z/ and /ks/ ending words

We repeated the previous experiment with adults, and extended the /z/ end sound data to one- morpheme vs two-morpheme verbs as well ( finds: sees, sneeze, )

We also included words ending in /ks/ : the rule here is that : 1-morpheme words end in “x” or “xe” ( I fix, six, axe ) and 2-morpheme words in “cks” ( he picks, socks).

In this experiment we used pseudo-words, as well as a real word control, and we gave the young adult participants a choice between two spellings

fox

The wily old was very cunning.

focks tricks

That magician always his audience

.

trix

yox

Jim sometimes after work.

yocks gricks

We have a in the garden. grix

klees

The children saw two at school .

kleeze

. proos

The children saw a at school . prooze

Frequencies of correct choice for /z/ ending verbs in

205 young adults educated at school only

35

30

Number of

25 participants out of 20

205

15

10

5

0

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Number of correct choices out of 30

10% of sample significantly above chance

Frequencies of correct choice for /z/ ending nouns in 205 young adults educated at school only

40

Number

35 of

30 participants out of 25

205

20

15

10

5

0

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Number of correct choices out of 30

12% of sample significantly above chance

Frequencies of correct choice for /ks/ ending verbs

40 in 205 young adults educated at school only

Number

205

35 of

30 participants out of 25

20

15

10

5

0

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Number of correct choices out of 30

15% of sample significantly above chance

Frequencies of correct choice for /ks/ ending nouns

30 in 205 young adults educated at school only

25

Number of 20 participants out of

205

15

10

5

0

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Number of correct choices out of 30

17% of sample significantly above chance

Frequencies of correct choice for /z/ ending nouns in 72 young university students

25

20

15

10

5

0

14 16 18 20 22 24

Number of correct choices out of 30

26 28

87.5% of sample significantly above chance

30

Frequencies of correct choice for /z/ ending verbs in 72 young university students

25

20

15

10

5

0

14 16 18 20 22 24

Number of correct choices out of 30

26 28

83% of sample significantly above chance

30

Percent significantly above chance in choice of correct endings in the three samples

N z nouns ks nouns

10-14 year olds 190 40 44

20 year recruits 205 12 17

20 year students 72 88 92

The difference between the recruits and the students represents an educational and a social class fault-line

Conclusions from English and Greek studies

The developmental process of children inferring rules on the basis of their word-specific knowledge seems to work better for Greek than for English children

It also works much better for some English individuals than for others

They are probably also due to the lack of explicit teaching about morphemic spelling rules

Test of the lack of teaching idea

We gave children of 7-8 years two sessions teaching about when to use “-ion” and “-ian” endings

magic music history library

India

Egypt political technical

Italy

Hungary magician musician historian librarian

Indian

Egyptian politician technician

Italian

Hungarian protect infect add subtract confess discuss suggest collect educate imitate protection infection addition subtraction confession discussion suggestion collection education imitation

Group pre-test

Two intervention sessions: pairs

Immediate post-test

Two month interval

Delayed post-test

Four kinds of intervention

We included four groups:

Explicit ( morpheme) N=40 C.A. 9y6m

Implicit ( morpheme) N=42 C.A. 9y7m

Mixed ( morpheme) (implicit followed by explicit)

N=42 C.A. 9y7m

Control ( comprehension)

N=76 C.A. 9y5m

The gang made a ____________________ to the police.

confession

The __________________________ was wonderful.

musician

Joe was a _______________ .

Christian

magic music magician

protect infect protection

12

11

10

9

8

14

Mean correct spelling of ion/ian endings in real words (out of 16)

13

Explicit

Implicit

Mixed

Control

Pretest Immediate posttest

Nunes, Bryant, Pretzlik & Hurry

Mean correct endings (out of 4) with pseudowords ending in -ian

3

2.8

2.6

2.4

2.2

2

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

1

Explicit

Implicit

Mixed

Control

Pretest Immediate Posttest

Morphemes change the meaning of words

Count the morphemes and compare them with your neighbour’s

fortunate

un

fortun

ate

un tied

un dis im in

un dis im in

dis

honest

logical illogical focal

To solve maths problems you need to be very ___________________.

electrics mechanics electricians

The people who were rewiring the house were ___________________.

 Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving

Literacy through Teaching Morphemes .

London: Routledge.

 Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009).

Children’s

Reading and Spelling. Oxford: Wiley-

Blackwell

Download