FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
CIVIL MILITARY OPERATIONS & THE RULE OF LAW
CERTIFICATE COURSE PLANNING EXERCISE BOOK
Paragraph
6. Higher Authority
1. Purpose
2. Objectives
3. Guidance and Exercise Preparation for
Seminar Students
4. Areas of Interest
5. Assumptions
Page
1
1
1
3
4
5
ALPHA
BRAVO
CHARLIE
DELTA
ECHO
FOXTROT
GOLF
Regional Intelligence summary and Background Data
Presidential Decision directive and Warning Order
Commander’s Concept of Operations Brief
OPORD Shell
FRAGO Format
Planning Assessment Factors
Kalimantan Crisis Operational Law Considerations
Timelines
Maps
Force Planning Factors
Deployment Consideration
Preliminary Logistics Estimate
Climatalogical Summary
Pronunciation Guide
Doctrinal Times
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Introduction
1. This case study builds on the Naval War College Borneo scenario exercise that was utilized in the
Stability, Security and Development in Complex Operations (SSDCO) course graduate certificate program offered at the Naval Postgraduate School in partnership with the US Army Civil Affairs & Psychological
Operations Command (Airborne). Students who participated in the course exercise utilized the Borneo scenario framework for learning and applying the Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP) in a crisis planning situation from the perspective of the J9 Staff.
2. The scenario utilized in the Civil Military Operations & the Rule of Law (RoL) certificate program advances the scenario from the US-led coalition’s liberation of Kalimantan Republic-occupied territory in
Malaysia and Brunei to a realistic depiction of a post-hostilities political crisis in southern Borneo where violent protests lead to the overthrow of General Riady’s regime. As the transitional government of the
Kalimantan Republic struggles to stabilize the nation, USPACOM is once again called upon to provide civil-military assistance.
3. As the political crisis has developed in Kalimantan, the Commander, USPACOM tasked Commander,
Seventh Fleet to form a Joint Task Force based on a CJCS Warning Order. Your task as the JTF J-9 staff is to formulate a Course of Action (COA) Decision and Concept of Operations (CONOPs) to take to the
Commander, USAPACOM and the President. Once your COA and CONOPs have been approved, you are then to construct an Operations Order (OPORD).
4. For the purposes of the exercise, your moderator will serve as higher authorities as required.
5. It is important to remember that scenario detailed in this case study is wholly fictitious. The scenario does not represent the views of the Department of Defense or other US Government agencies.
6. Please address any administrative questions or comments for this exercise to one of the following points of contact:
GP 3110
GP 3210
GP 3310 Prof. Paula Philbin
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
To expose students in the Civil Military Operations & the Rule of Law (RoL) certificate course to planning and decision-making at the joint Task Force Commander level in order to improve their ability to employ US forces in a joint operational environment ranging from peacetime presence to military response to a crisis situation. This planning exercise is a continuation of the Naval War College
Borneo Scenario previously conducted.
2.

Demonstrate and understanding of the Joint Planning Process (JOPP).

Demonstrate the ability to apply the joint Operational Planning Process to Civil Military operations and Rule of Law operational situations.
3.
a. The X-week JOPP/Joint Task Force Planning exercise will be conducted as a one-sided operational level exercise conducted in a planning phase and an execution phase. Seminars will play at the level of the Joint Task Force Commander, Component Commanders, and their respective staffs.
b. Beginning in XXXXXXX , Session XXX the seminar will focus on the techniques for developing a
Commander’s Estimate of the Situation (CES) (Level 1 Detail). Using this case study, Joint Pub 5-0, NWP
5-01, the Joint Operation Planning Process Workbook (NWC 4111) and the JOPP Worksheet, students as members of a planning team will conduct mission analysis, develop courses of action (COAs), analyze and compare developed COAs and decide on a COA as part of a crisis action planning exercise.
c. In a role playing environment, the class will draft a sequenced and synchronized concept of operations (CONOPS). Concurrently, students will also commence the development of a draft
Operations Order (OPORD). It is expected that student staffs will continue to coordinate planning between sessions. Upon completion, students will present a Concept of Operations (CONOPs) oral brief and a written Operations Order (OPORD) as well as a complete synchronization matrix. After review of the CONOPS brief, OPORD, and synchronization matrix by the moderator, the seminar will be debriefed as to what has transpired over a planned “time-step.” This “time-step” determined by the moderator, will leap ahead of the period of time into the near future. The seminar’s role will be to react to what has occurred by refining their CONOPS and submitting a Fragmentary Order (FRAGO) to update their
OPORD. They will then brief their revised CONOPS. At the end of the exercise, the seminar will discuss the significant lessons learned during the game in a Hot Wash-Up.
d. Seminar moderators will make student player assignments. The Joint Task Force Commander may adjust as necessary after conferring with the moderator. All students should ensure they clearly understand their respective individual assignments and responsibilities.
e. Initial friendly and enemy force position for the planning exercise will be determined and assigned by the moderator.
f. Students should thoroughly familiarize themselves with applicable portions of the exercise documents with emphasis on the following:
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
(1) Scenario
(2) Friendly Forces
(3) Enemy Forces (based on intelligence)
(4) Coalition and neutral forces and units in the Operations Area (OPAREA)
(5) Geography of the OPAREA
(6) Environmental conditions
g. As a minimum, the following should be completed prior to the exercise start:
(1) Make staff personnel assignments (seminar moderator will do this)
(2) Review maps and familiarize yourself with:
(a) National strategy and key objectives
(b) US forces
(c) Host Nation and Coalition forces
(d) De-stabilizing forces opposed to Task Force CMO and RoL efforts
h. ALL seminar students should be knowledgeable of the plan of operations for their Task Force.
i. The Joint Task Force Commander will organize the officers assigned to his/her staff, review the
Commander’s Estimate and provide a briefing.
j. The Joint Task Force Commander will, during the Hot Wash-up, be requested to provide reasons for decisions of a significant nature made during the planning phase as well as decisions made during the play of the exercise.
k. It is recognized that all of the detailed information required to conduct exercise play may not be contained within the various sections of this exercise book. Therefore, a Higher Authority message system will be established between the moderator and the player staff. Each staff may request additional information or changes to provided information, such as: specific intelligence details (RFIs), minor changes in operational capabilities of units, logistics or supply redistribution, geographic information, etc. Each message will be answered by the moderator acting as Higher Authority.
4.
a. During the Distributed Learning Phase, students complete ……
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
b. All necessary information for completing the assignments is included in the appropriate syllabus and on the online Complex Operations Wiki Kalimantan Republic country study.
5.
In formulating a Civil Military Operations CONOPS brief (seminar) and an OPORD (Distributed Learning), students should consider problems/issues and make decisions concerning:
a. Termination goals
b. Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
c. Force allocation and deployment
g. Coalition force involvement
h. Command relationships (including components and coalition members)
i. Logistics
m. Extended lines of communication/support
n. Establishing support for forward forces
o. Strategic Communication/Information Operations (IO)
q. Tactical coordination
r. Civil Affairs
s. Civilian Internee containment/issues
u. ROE
v. Law of Armed Conflict
x. Relations with the press and media
y. SOF operations
6.
a. Orders of battle are generally reflective of real-world forces and are tailored in relative capability to achieve game objectives.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
b. Friendly and enemy platforms, equipment and weapon systems will be credited with full mission capability, unless assessed by the moderators to have suffered prior battle damage or be in an incomplete repair or overhaul status. Adverse weather may also be assessed by the moderators to degrade system effectiveness.
c. Friendly player actions and decisions are not constrained by current, real-world plans and doctrinal concepts. Students may employ their assigned forces in any manner desired, provided the forces are physically capable of performing the action(s) specified.
d. Moderators will provide timely Higher Authority decisions during both phases.
7.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
XX Month 20X5
From: USAPACOM J2
To: Commander, United States Pacific Command
Subject: USPACOM Background Paper on Civil War and Regime Change in Kalimantan
Enclosures:
(1) Kalimantan Political Map
(2) Joint Intelligence Center Pacific (JICPAC) Situation Assessment
(3) Host Nation Security Forces
(4) Coalition Forces
(5) Kalimantan Fact Sheet
(6) Southeast Asian Chokepoints Background Paper
1. The Kalimantan Republic suffered a reversal in its economic fortunes in June 20X3 collapse of world oil prices. Economic worries deepened later that summer when estimates of Kalimantan’s offshore energy reserves proved grossly overestimated.
2. Kalimantan President, General Begwan Riady, suspended his “New Kalimantan” development and social programs due to decreased oil revenues. Additionally, he scaled back his military transformation initiatives largely financed through future oil revenue estimates through agreements with PRC arms companies. Though he remained popular with the military and many in the business class, the suspension of his “New Kalimantan” programs proved very unpopular with average citizens— particularly those in the countryside. International election observers’ exit polls indicate opposition candidate Siad Bergay had won the October 20X3 national election. Official results, however, declared
Riady the winner by a wide margin. Widespread voter fraud and intimidation on the part of paramilitary organizations employed by Riady were documented by international observers and foreign media. Dissenting voices in the press were silenced and foreign media’s movement were monitored and severely restricted following the election.
3. Immediately following the election results, public demonstrations continued with increasing frequency and intensity through the winter of 20X3/X4. In addition to the protests by those out of work as well as democratic supporters of Bergay, “pro-government” rallies with were being incited by radical groups with ties to the global terrorist network al-Queda. Efforts to obtain loans or investment capital from Western nations have been largely rebuffed in part due to the strong concerns from the IMF and
World Bank.
4. In December 20X3, Riady formally sought financial aid from neighboring Malaysia and Brunei. But with Kalimantan’s foreign debt now totaling nearly $12 billion, neither of its Bornean neighbors were willing to extend either outright grants or unsecured loans to the struggling nation. In early 20X4, the
Riady regime began a series of diplomatic “denouncements” of Malaysia and Brunei for what it described as “their callous and criminal failure to help their brothers to the south”. These messages
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY continued over the next several months, increasing in rancor. A recurring theme in Riady’s speeches was of wealth inequality amongst the nations of Borneo and the call for unification under a vision of
“One Borneo, One Nation.”
5. During this time, the Riady government’s covert support of East Malaysian separatist group “Iban” in the mountains of the western province of Sarawak greatly increased with the intent to foment dissent and destabilize any attempts by the local populace to help themselves. “Iban” leaders were later implicated in murders of several local Malaysian government officials who voiced opposition to Riady’s plan for Borneo’s future. “Iban” is also minimally financially supported by a variety of international
Islamic groups such as Jemaah Isamiya (JI) and Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) and their influence extended south into the border region with Kalimantan.
6. Hostilities between Kalimantan and Malaysia were initiated on 3 March 20X4 when Kalimantan Army infantry battalion crossed the border into Sarawak and occupied the town of Bau, only 20 miles from the regional capitol city of Kuching. ASEAN-sponsored talks in Bangok, Thailand on 7 March failed to resolve the crisis Kalimantan forces. The Malaysian Army attacked re-enforced and dug-in Kalimantan forces in Bau on 12 March and was soundly defeated. Kalimantan forces attacked Kuching on 18 March with two brigades from their 1 st Infantry Division, supported by artillery, air and naval forces, and an amphibious landing at Bako. During the attack, a Malaysian frigate was sunk by two Kalimantan missile patrol boats northeast of Kuching. Malaysia and Brunei walked out of the Bangkok talks on 19 March.
Kuching was taken by Kalimantan forces on 23 March resulting in heavy Malaysian Army casualties and civilian property damage.
7. Kalimantan Armed forces quickly consolidated their gains and threatened to advance with significant re-enforcements on the population centers and oil fields in northern Malaysia and Brunei. With insufficient military troops available, Malaysian and Brunei ambassadors met with the United States
President, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense on 12 April and requested American assistance in defending against further loss of Malaysian territory until such time as a multi-division sized Malaysian military force could repel Riady’s forces.
8. On 14 April, 20X4, a CJSC Warning Order was sent to USPACOM to provide Commander’s Estimate with recommended and alternate courses of action for the Secretary of Defense. USPACOM then began preparations for contingency operations in Borneo under the operational name “Pacific Teak”.
9.
10. As the remnants of Riady’s forces returned to Kalimantan following the XX month cease fire agreement, opposition to Riady’s regime was manifested in widespread demonstrations. Riady brutally suppressed dissent through a series of police crackdowns resulting in the jails being filled with prisoners from the opposition movement and innocent civilians who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The rounded up prisoners were housed with convicted criminals and many were tortured in the jails and interrogation rooms.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
11. With the tacit support of several western and regional powers, an armed insurgency opposed to the dictatorship of General Riady began to form in several population centers. Military forces to include the
Kalimantan Army X Infantry Division led by Major General XXXXX XXXXXXX broke ranks with Riady and formed the Kalimantan Liberation Army (KLA) with the expressed intent to overthrow the Riady regime and establish a free and democratic Kalimantan. Siad Bergay, the opposition leader under house arrest since the nullified 20X3 elections escaped and joined with the KLA.
12. The political arm of “Iban” led by XXXXXXXXXXXX used the instability to negotiate with Riady to grant concessions to his organization in exchange for supporting his regime. In exchange for increased autonomy and the establishment of sharia law in areas of Kalimantan Barat, “Iban” paramilitaries took control of neighborhoods with anti-government leanings, killing many protesters and intimidating both pro-Riady and anti-government elements alike.
13. As human rights violations and atrocities increased, international pressure calling for Riady to step down intensified. UNMIB peacekeepers along the Malaysian border established numerous refugee camps to deal with the flow of people escaping the fighting between the KLA and forces loyal to Riady.
14. On XX month, the UN Security Council passed a resolution establishing economic sanctions to further isolate General Riady. China, who formerly supported the Riady regime, concluded that it was in their economic and strategic interest to join the world community in calling for regime change.
Diplomatic overtures were made to Riady and his family to accept exile in one of several friendly nations to avoid further bloodshed. On XX Month, Riady addressed the nation blaming Siad Bergay and western
“imperialist” for the escalation of violence in Kalimantan, proclaiming that he would “fight for the people of Kalimantan” and “restore peace and prosperity to Borneo.”
15. On XX Month, Siad Bergay and the KLA reached out to the United States and other coalition forces to garner support for his transitional government and to seek assistance from the international community to expand the UN peacekeeping mission in Sarawak and Sabah, Malaysia to use limited combat power to protect lives and property and to facilitate regime change in Kalimantan with a regional stabilization mission following the fall of the Riady regime.
15. On XX Month, the UN Security Council passed Resolution XXXX, expanding the role of the UNMIB peacekeeping force by authorizing military force in Kalimantan to prevent human rights violations and atrocities in Kalimantan perpetrated by the Riady regime. On XX Month, the USS XXXXXXXXXX operating in the South China Sea enforcing a “no-fly zone” as part of the UNMIB mandate, launched multiple combat sorties to destroy Riady’s Army in the field and his ability to wage war on his people. The
Kalimantan Army garrisons at XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX are destroyed.
16. On XX Month, Major General XXXXXXX of X Infantry Division, and Admiral XXXXXXXX of the
Kalimantan Naval Forces denounce General Riady and join with the KLA, severely weakening his grip on power. That same day, General Riady began secret negotiations with the government of Saudi Arabia to seek exile for himself, his extended family, and several lieutenants. On XX Month, a chartered Saudi
Airlines 747 left XXXXXXX for Riyadh. Upon his departure, Siad Bergay of the KLA was installed as leader of the Kalimantan transition government by the Chief Justice of Kalimantan Judicial Council following a
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY unanimous vote of the remaining members of the Kalimantan People’s Assembly. A formal request by
Bergay seeking international assistance from the United Nations was immediately issued.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Change “Indonesia” on map to “Kalimantan”
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Enclosure (2) to USPACOM Background Paper on the Civil War and Regime Change in Kalimantan
Date: XX Month 20X5
Subj: Joint Intelligence Center Pacific (JICPAC) Situation Assessment
1. JICPAC assesses the transitional government of Siad Bergay is unable to bring stability to Kalimantan without large-scale international support. Bergay faces significant challenges in rebuilding key infrastructure damaged in the 20X5 civil war. International sanctions have crippled the economy and though world oil prices are on the rise, estimates of future revenues are nowhere near the cost estimates of rebuilding, particularly with existing foreign debt totaling $12 billion.
2. Additionally, the Kalimantan Army is in disarray after being defeated in Malaysia by US-led forces in
20X4 and its remnants heavily damaged by Kalimantan Liberation Army and UN forces during the 20X5 civil war. The loyalty of some units and leaders is in question and amnesty and reconciliation commissions will be essential to rebuilding this institution to serve the people of Kalimantan.
3. The Kalimantan National Police (KNP) is widely viewed as corrupt and strongly tied to the Riady regime. The KNP was widely used in the crackdowns leading up to the revolution and implicated in widespread human rights violations and used as an instrument of torture by the Riady’s intelligence agencies. During the run up to the civil war, political opponents and those accused of disloyalty to the government were rounded up and housed with criminals in prisons and temporary detention facilities throughout the country. Judges were increasingly afraid to rule because they were faced with heavy pressure from the government to find all prisoners guilty and also faced with threats from the opposition if they did. For the same reasons, lawyers were reluctant to prosecute or defend cases because of death threats. Establishing and training a new police force and strengthening the judiciary are critically important tasks that must be undertaken with the training assistance of international police monitors and Rule of Law experts for the people of Kalimantan to feel safe and secure.
4. Free and fair elections must follow the formation of a new national constitution NLT 20X7 when the term Bergay was elected to in the nullified elections of 20X3 expires to provide political stability to the nation. Under the present constitution, Bergay is limited to serving only one 5-year term.
Reconciliation commissions must be convened to help expedite the political process.
5. The Iban Islamic separatist movement allied with the Riady regime in exchange for political autonomy in Kalimantan Balat leading up to the 20X3 Malaysian invasion. They maintain a loose affiliation with al-
Queda organizations and its members have received training and financial support. Under the Riady regime, the organization was used as an instrument to foment dissent in Malaysia and destabilize any attempts by the location population to help themselves and Iban influence in areas of Kalimantan Balat was tolerated. Iban numbers XXXX members on both sides of the Kalimantan border and pose a threat to regional stability in both countries based on their history of terror tactics, violence, and political murder. Iban expressed goal is the establishment of an Islamic state based on sharia law.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
5. Peoples Republic of China
a. Assessed to have strong economic and political interest in the stability of the Kalimantan Republic.
During the Riady regime, they were the primary suppliers of military hardware and weapons as well as loans to support the “New Kalimantan” initiatives. With significant capital invested in the nation, they have an economic interest to recoup their investment and a strategic interest in maintaining a military presence in the region.
b. By deploying a sizable peacekeeping force to support UNMIB stabilization efforts, China is announcing to the world it seeks and increased role in regional and world affairs
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Enclosure (3) to USPACOM Background Paper on Civil War and Regime Change in Kalimantan
Date: XX Month 20X5
Subj: Kalimantan Republic Order-of Battle
(Note: The following military order-of-battle data is constructive and for instructional use only.)
Overview
1. Operational control for the Kalimantan Republic Armed Forces originates with the Armed Forces High
Command, the highest-level joint command, which is located in the capital city of Banjarmasin, and extends down through the two Military District Headquarters, which are geographic, operational-level joint commands (inter-district dividing line is 114E), to the individual service squadrons, wings, or divisions within each district. Administrative control of Kalimantan forces runs from service headquarters in the capital to individual units. The High Command maintains direct control over significant army and air forces: these forces provide for regime security and also function as the nation’s strategic military reserve to back up Military District forces in the accomplishment of military objectives
2. Actual control of the military is in flux as the loyalty to the transition government for several units is in question. Some key leaders to include Defense Minister Air Marshal XXXX XXXXX accepted exile with
General Riady.
Army of the Kalimantan Republic (AKR)
1. AKR Organization.
2. AKR Table of Organization and Equipment.
Kalimantan Republic Navy (KRN)
1. KRN Organization.
2. KRN Unit Specifications.
Kalimantan Republic Air Force (KRAF)
1. Organization.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
2. KRAF Aircraft Specifications.
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Enclosure (3) to USPACOM Background Paper on Civil War and Regime Change in Kalimantan
Date: XX Month 20X5
Subj: Coalition Order-of Battle
(Note: The following military order-of-battle data is constructive and for instructional use only.)
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Enclosure (4) to USPACOM Background Paper on Civil War and Regime Change in Kalimantan
Date: XX Month 20X5
Subj: Kalimantan Fact Sheet
(Note: The following military order-of-battle data is constructive and for instructional use only.)
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE
NUMBER XX-X
XX Month 20X5
1. The United States of America supports the Sovereign State of the Kalimantan Republic’s efforts to bring peace and stability to their nation following civil unrest and exile of the dictatorial regime under their former leader, General Begwan Riady We have enduring interest in the Southwest Pacific region that include assuring the security of our friends. I intend to use all of the instruments of national power to ensure the maintain peace and security of the region and the stabilization of a free and democratic
Kalimantan Republic.
2. The desired end state is a nation with enhanced security, growing democracy and economic prosperity. To achieve this vision, we must work in concert with the Transitional Government of the
Kalimantan Republic, United Nations Mission in Borneo (UNMIB), ASEAN, and other regional partners dedicated to this goal.
3. In order to focus our near-term planning, the following national objectives are established: a.
Assistance to the Kalimantan Transitional Government in establishment and training of
Kalimantan Security Forces capable of maintaining public order and safeguarding human rights in accordance with international norms and conventions. b.
Assistance with drafting a new democratic constitution to be followed by national, regional, and local elections that reflect the will of the people.
c. Infrastructure and development projects to enhance security and stabilize key sectors of the economy.
4. Upon receipt of this directive, all Federal Agencies will develop programs suitable for integration into a national POL-MIL plan.
///-Original Signed-///
President of the United States of America
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
CJCS WARNING ORDER
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
OP IMMEDIATE
DTG: XXXXXXZ MonthX5
FROM: CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
TO: COMSEVENTHFLT
COMJFT PACTEAK
COMTHIRDFLT
COMPACFLT PEARL HAROBR HI
COMPPACAF HICKAM AFB HI
COMUSARPAC FT SHAFTER HI
COMSOCPAC HONOLULU HI
COMMARFORPAC CAM SMITH
COMUSTRANSCOM SCOTT AFB IL
USFK SEOUL KOR
USFJ YOKOTA JP
JICPAC PEARL HARBOR HI
ALCOM ELEMENDORF AK
COMNAVMARIANAS GUAM
COMLOGWESTGRU SINGAPORE
COMMPSRON THREE GUAM
PACOM JIOC CAMP SMITH HI
CG III MEF
HQ 13 AF GUAM AFB GU//CC//
COM I CORPS FT LEWIS WA
INFO:
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
FOR INSTURCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY