Source for image: Westfield Public School District, Office of English Language Learners.
Close partnership & collaboration.
 Included in the course syllabus.
 Worked out schedule.
 Customized help to students.
 Customized information literacy
instruction sessions based on the needs of
the students.
 Worked with students inside and outside
of the classroom on debates and writing
assignments.





Should drivers be completely banned from using cell
phones?
Should students be rewarded for good grades and high
test scores with cash and prizes?
Should schools control what students eat by only
selling & serving forms of health foods?
Should the government tap into American citizen’s
private information? There are those who say that it is
necessary in order to keep the country safe from
terrorists in order to prevent another 9/11 type of
attack.
Source for image: The Poetic Debaters Project.
Students had to participate in two debates.
 Each debate consisted of 10 students (5 pros
& 5 cons). Final debate had 12 students.
 Embedded librarian worked closely with
each team in preparation for the debates
(and papers).

Source for images: The Poetic Debaters Project
 Introduction.
 Pro
/ Con Arguments.
 Rebuttal.
 Conclusion.
 Audience evaluation.
 Winners announced.

Source for image: “Teaching Speaking Skills: Debates in the ESL Classroom.” On TESOL: How to Teach English.
Participating and preparing for debates:
 Improves students’ knowledge of English.
 Improves students’ self-confidence to speak, read and
write English.
 Improves students’ ability to work collaboratively with
others.
 Improves students’ ability to conduct research in the
library.
 Improves students’ critical thinking skills.
Source for images: Queensborough Community College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Factbook 2013-2014.
Fall 2013 Facts
 16,291 students enrolled.
 6% of first-time freshmen were international students.
 Of first-time freshmen, Hispanic students represented the
largest ethnic group (30%), followed by Asian and Black
students (22% each) and 18%White students.
 44.4% of first-time freshmen spoke a language other than
English at home.
 Top five native languages other than English of first-time
freshmen: Spanish (260 students), Chinese (121), Korean (35),
Bengali (34), and Urdu (34).
Source: Queensborough Community College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Fact book 2013-2014.
Source: Queensborough Community College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Fact book 2013-2014.






Diverse population.
Academic Literacy Dept.
Enrolled in BE-203
Intermediate Composition
for ESL Students.
Emphasis on intermediate
grammar, paragraph
development, and writing
the short composition.






Challenging for both students & librarians.
Different levels of English proficiency.
Often lack confidence and courage to ask for help.
Often had little or no experience with information
literacy.
Need information literacy skills to succeed.
Often are motivated to be successful.






The embedded librarian easily enters the students’ workspace
and becomes more knowledgeable and understanding of the
their needs and work in the classroom.
Strong working relationship can form and develop between
the librarian, the students and the instructor.
Embedded librarian can create a "safe and welcoming"
environment for the students.
The students receive the needed assistance and expertise
customized to their needs.
The instructor and librarian work as a team and share
responsibility for the success of the students.
"Embedded librarians often go above and beyond traditional
expectations in contributing to the team's success.”
Shumaker, David. The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It’s Needed. Medford, New
Jersey: Information Today, Inc., 2012. Print.

Source for photo: Prof. Neera Mohess, Queensborough Community College, CUNY
Spring Semester 2014 (January – May)


TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES: 199
TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS PARTICIPATING: 3,828

Source for image: Queensborough Community College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Factbook 2013-2014.







Introduction to the Library’s Embedded Librarian Program
provided to subject faculty.
Minimum of two Library Information Literacy Classes
required over the course of the semester.
Dates of the classes determined at the time of class
scheduling.
Embedded librarians assigned to courses requested by faculty
members.
Each embedded librarian works with students in each course
throughout the semester.
Librarians also embedded in departments as liaisons.
For PNET and FNET classes, embedded librarian works
with students online.
Fall 2013
 Total number of classes participating: 34
 Total number of Library sessions generated: 60
 Total number of full-time librarians participating: 9
Spring 2014
 Total number of classes participating: 44
 Total number of Library sessions generated: 81
 Total number of full-time librarians participating: 9

Fall 2014
 Total number of classes participating: 57
 Total number of Library Sessions Generated: 93
 Total number of full-time librarians participating: 9
Source for image: RefKit (Wordpress)
Research Strategy
 Pre-Test and Post-Test Design
Data Collection Method
 Surveys
◦ Quantitative (Likert scales)
◦ Qualitative (comments )
Analysis


Quantitative
Qualitative Analysis
Source for image: Wisconsin Department of Public Education, “Information for Parents About Assessment in
Wisconsin”

Two parts:
◦ 1st Part: Likert scale on effectiveness of using debates in the
classroom & library research assessment for ELL learners
◦ 2nd Part: Open-ended questions / Reflection essays.



Same survey used in the 1st part for the pre- and posttests but order of questions changed.
Different survey used for the pre- and post-test of the
2nd part, reflection essays.
Pre- and post-tests administered by IRB certified
faculty member in the absence of the instructor &
embedded librarian.





Data not analyzed as yet.
Students’ experience with debates in the classroom.
Students’ confidence about preparing and participating
in debates in the classroom.
Students’ confidence about their abilities to speak, read
and write in English.
Speaking in native language and in English.




Data not analyzed as yet.
ESL students information literacy skills.
ESL students’ experience and feelings on conducting
research or using library resources.
Students’ experience of having an embedded librarian.







How successful was the project?
Very successful.
Improvement in students’ ability to speak, read and write
in English.
Students gained more confidence in speaking and critically
thinking in English.
Students did very well in the course.
Early exit for nine students who were able to take the
CATW without further remediation.
Improvement in information literacy skills and confidence
in using the library resources.
Asher, Curt , Emerson Case, and Ying Zhong. “Serving Generation 1.5: Academic Library Use and Students
from Non-English-Speaking Households.” College Research Libraries 70.3 (2009): 258-272. Education Source.
Web. 29 Dec. 2014.
Bagnole, John W. “An Interactive Information Literacy Course for International Students: a Practical Blueprint
for ESL Learners.” TESL-EJ.org. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Mar. 2003. Web. 24
Nov. 2014.
Bordonaro, Karen. “Language Learning in the Library: an Exploratory Study of ESL Students.” The Journal of
Academic Librarianship 32. 5 (2006): 518–526. ScienceDirect. Web. 29 Nov. 2014.
Bryan, Jacalyn, and Elana Karshmer. “Assessment in the One Shot Session: Using Pre- and Post-Tests to
Measure Innovative Instructional Strategies among First-Year Students.” College and Research Libraries 74.6
(2013): 574-586. Education Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Conteh-Morgan, Miriam. “Connecting the Dots: Limited English Proficiency, Second Language Learning
Theories, and Information Literacy Instruction.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28.4 (2002): 191–196.
ScienceDirect. Web 22 Dec. 2014.
____. “Empowering ESL students: a New Model for Information Literacy Instruction.” The Journal of Academic
Librarianship 32.5 (2006): 518–526. ScienceDirect. Web. 22 Dec. 2014.
Conway, William D. “Debate in the TESL Classroom.” TESOL Quarterly 10.3 (1976): 305-308. J-STOR. Web. 12
Dec. 2014.
Curry, Mary Jane. “UCLA Community College Review: Academic Literacy for English Language Learners.”
Community College Review 32.2 (2004):51-68. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 November 2013.
Domínguez-Flores, Noraida, and Ling Wang. “Online Learning Communities: Enhancing Undergraduate
Students' Acquisition of Information Skills.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 37. 6 (2011): 495–503.
ScienceDirect. Web. 29 Dec. 2014.
Embedded Librarians: Moving Beyond One-Shot Instruction. Eds. Cassandra Kvenild and Kaijsa Calkins. Chicago:
Association of College and Research Libraries, 2011. Print.
Embedded Librarianship: What Every Academic Librarian Should Know. Eds. Alice L. Daugherty and Michael F. Russo.
Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2013. Print.
Helmke, Jonathan, and Brad S. Matthies. “Assessing Freshmen Library Skills and Attitudes Before Program
Development: One Library’s Experience.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 11.2 (2004): 29-49. Library &
Information Science Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Houlson, Van. “Getting Results from One-Shot Instruction: a Workshop for First-Year Students.” College &
Undergraduate Libraries 14.1 (2007): 89-108. Library & Information Science Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Ishimura, Yusuke, and Joan C. Bartlett. “Are Librarians Equipped to Teach International Students? A Survey
of Current Practices and Recommendations for Training.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (2014):
313–321. ScienceDirect. Web. 19 Dec. 2014.
Embedded Librarianship: What Every Academic Librarian Should Know. Eds. Alice L. Daugherty and Michael F. Russo.
Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2013. Print.
Helmke, Jonathan, and Brad S. Matthies. “Assessing Freshmen Library Skills and Attitudes Before Program
Development: One Library’s Experience.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 11.2 (2004): 29-49. Library &
Information Science Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Houlson, Van. “Getting Results from One-Shot Instruction: a Workshop for First-Year Students.” College &
Undergraduate Libraries 14.1 (2007): 89-108. Library & Information Science Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Ishimura, Yusuke, and Joan C. Bartlett. “Are Librarians Equipped to Teach International Students? A Survey
of Current Practices and Recommendations for Training.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (2014):
313–321. ScienceDirect. Web. 19 Dec. 2014.
Kurbanoglu, S. Serap, Buket Akkoyunlu, and Aysun Umay. “Developing the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy
Scale.” Journal of Documentation 62.6 (2006): 730-743. Directory of Open Access Journals. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
Kvenild, Cass. “The Future of Embedded Librarianship: Best Practices and Opportunities.”
Cclibinstruction.org, California Conference on Library Instruction. Web. 24 Nov. 2014.
Lustigova, Lenka . "Speak Your Mind: Simplified Debates as a Learning Tool at the University Level." Journal on
Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science 4.1 (2011):18-20. Education Source. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Macdonaid, Katrina. “ESL Library Skills: an Information Literacy Program for Adults with Low Levels of
English Literacy.” Australian Library Journal 57.3 (2008): 295-309. Academic Search Complete. Web. 21 Dec.
2014.
Muir, Gordon, and Holly Heller-Ross. “Is Embedded Librarianship Right for Your Institution?” Public Services
Quarterly 6.2/3 (2010): 92-109. Library & Information Science Source. Web. 22 Dec. 2014.
Osa, Justina O. “Teaching International Students to Access and Use Library Resources.” Teaching Information
Literacy Skills to Social Sciences Students and Practitioners: A Casebook of Applications. Ed. Douglas Cook and
Natasha Cooper. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2006. 156-64. Print.
Patterson, David Jay. “Becoming Researchers: Community College ESL Students, Information Literacy, and
the Library.” Diss. U of California, Berkeley, 2011. Web. 18 December 2014.
Pritchard, Peggy A. “The Embedded Science Librarian: Partner in Curriculum Design and Delivery.” Journal of
Library Administration 50 (2010): 373–396, 2010. Education Source. Web. 28 Nov. 2014.
Queensborough Community College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Factbook 2013-2014. Web.
3 Jan. 2015.
Ryan D. Wright, et al. “Relationship Building with Students and Instructors of ESL: Bridging the Gap For
Library Instruction And Services.” Reference Services Review 40.3 (2012): 352-367. Education Research Complete.
Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Sheret, Larry, and John A. Steele. “Information Literacy Assessment: Keep It Simple, Keep It Going.” Reference
and User Services Quarterly 52.3 (2013): 208-15. Education Source. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
Shumaker, David. The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It’s Needed. Medford, New
Jersey: Information Today, Inc., 2012. Print.
Swoger, Bonnie. “Closing the Assessment Loop Using Pre- and Post-Assessment.” Reference Services Review 39.2
(2011): 244-259. Education Source Complete. Web. 30 Sept. 2014.
Stanley, Shannon M. “Standardized Library Instruction Assessment: an Institution-Specific Approach.”
Information Research 15.3 (Sept. 2010): 1-22. Directory of Open Access Journals. Web. 20 Oct. 2014.
Trimble, Ruth A. “Thinking in English.” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and
Improvement (1993). ERIC. Web. ED377673. 24 Nov. 2014.
Wright, Ryan D., et al. “Relationship Building with Students and Instructors of ES: Bridging the Gap for
Library Instruction and Services.” Reference Services Review 40.3 (2012): 352-367. Education Research Complete.
Web. 20 Oct. 2014.
Contact: Barbara Bonous-Smit
Queensborough Community College,
The City University of New York
bbonoussmit@qcc.cuny.edu