Columbus State Community College
Medical Laboratory Technology Program Learning Outcomes Validation Report
July 12, 2010
Medical Laboratory Technology Program
Allied Health Department
Career and Technical Services
________________________________
Connie Grossman, M.Ed, RDH
Chairperson, Allied Health Department
________________________________
Sandra Arrighi, M.Ed, MT(ASCP)SBB
Medical Laboratory Technology
Program Coordinator/Assistant Professor
_________________________________
MaryEllen Tancred, MBA, MT(ASCP)SH
Medical Laboratory Technology
Assistant Professor
1
Executive Summary
The institutional goal is to assure that learners attain their educational goals. In doing so, it is
the program faculty member’s responsibility to determine the degree to which students are
achieving the stated academic outcomes. Program outcomes are routinely examined and
updated so that the program curriculum continues to meet the needs of the community which it
serves, which for the MLT Program, it is the clinical community. The MLT Program works
continually on the program validation process. Fulltime and part time faculty members
assembled in 2008 to discuss possible program outcome revisions. A vote to approve the
recommended changes involved program faculty and clinical affiliate representatives.
Foundation of MLT Program Outcomes
The Medical Laboratory Technology (MLT) Program is accredited by the National Accrediting
Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences (NAACLS). The MLT Program outcomes also referred
to as competencies, are derived from the:
 Description of the Clinical Laboratory Science Profession and the Description of Career
Entry of the Clinical Laboratory Technician/Medical Laboratory Technician published in
the NAACLS Standards of Accredited Educational Programs for the CLT/MLT
(Appendix I).
 American Society for Clinical Pathology Board of Certification (ASCP-BOC) MLT(ASCP)
Examination Content Guideline and Updates to Technical Curricula Addition and
Deletion List (Appendix I)
Internal and external data was collected and evaluated to determine if the current program
outcomes are valid and continue to meet the needs of the clinical community.
External Validation Methods
External data sources include ASCP-BOC score comparison to national averages, Advisory
Committee meeting discussions, an Advisory Committee Learning Outcomes Voting Process,
Employer Follow-up Questionnaire, and NAACLS accreditation processes.
Internal Validation Methods
Internal data sources include a Student Potential Graduate Survey, Student Post Graduate
Survey, MLT Program/course meeting discussions with fulltime and part time faculty, a Mock
Registry Exam, and refresher course enrollment numbers.
Significant Findings
A review of college assessment guidelines in 2008, revealed a need to reduce the number of
program goals. The 2007 MLT Validation Report listed 13 MLT Program goals. The goals were
reviewed by Program Faculty (fulltime and part time) and the MLT Advisory Committee
Members over a period of six months. During the review process it was decided by all that the
outcomes could be consolidated while maintaining the intended competencies (Appendix III).
2
Summary of Methods Used to Validate Program Outcomes
External Sources
External data sources include ASCP-BOC score comparison to national averages, Advisory
Committee meeting discussions and votes, Employer Follow-up Questionnaire, and NAACLS
accreditation processes.
Assessment Method
ASCP-BOC
Certification Score
Comparison
MLT Advisory
Committee Meetings
Employer Follow-up
Questionnaire
NAACLS Accreditation
Data Source
Frequency
ASCP-BOC
website
Quarterly
Meetings,
Voting,
Surveys
Bi-annual
meetings
Customer
Satisfaction
Survey
MLT Peer
Reviewers
assigned by
NAACLS
Annual
Every 5-7
years (The
most recent
Self-Study
document
was
submitted
May, 2010)
Description of
Evaluation
Certification
scores are made
available to
Program
Directors on a
quarterly basis
Round table
discussions
during meetings
provide insight
into program
strengths and
weaknesses
Program
outcomes were
evaluated by
clinical affiliates
and MLT faculty
An employer
survey of recent
graduates
NAACLS reviews
a self-study
document and
performs a site
visit. The next
site visit is
scheduled for
October 2010
Results found in
Appendix
Results are in the
main body of the
report. The online
documentation is
located in appendix
II
III
IV
The MLT program
was awarded a 7year reaccreditation
period in 2003.
Results pertaining
to the
reaccreditation
were published in
the 2004 Validation
Report
A revised copy of the F/S charts can be found in Appendix X.
3
Internal Sources
Internal data sources include MLT Program faculty meetings, Potential and Post Graduate
Surveys, Mock Registry Exam scores, and Refresher course enrollment numbers.
Assessment
Method
MLT Program
Meetings
Data
Source
Faculty
Meetings
Student Potential
Graduate Survey
Survey
Student Post
Graduate Survey
Survey
Mock Registry Exam
Exam
Refresher course
enrollment numbers
Enrollment
data
Frequency
Description of
Evaluation
1 time/month
MLT Program faculty
meet to discuss
topics related to
curricula, program
policies, etc.
Minutes from two
meetings that
focused on program
outcomes are
included as evidence
For each
Program outcomes
graduating
are evaluated by
class one time potential MLT
per year
graduates after
completing their
clinical experience
For each
Program outcomes
graduating
are evaluated by
class one time MLT program
per year
graduates 6 months
post graduation
Final
All potential
Comprehensive graduates must pass
Exam
this exam to pass the
capstone Med Lab
Case Studies Course
Quarterly
Enrollment numbers
for the MLT
Refresher courses
are compiled in an
Excel file. This data
is used to validate
program outcomes #
2 and #4
Results found
in Appendix:
Minutes to
meeting are
included in
Appendix V
Results are in
main body of
report and blank
copy in
Appendix VI
Results are in
main body of
report and a
blank copy in
Appendix VII
Results are in
the main body
of the report.
Results are in
the main body
of the report.
4
Section 1: Introduction to the Program
Program Goals
In December 2008, thirteen MLT Program outcomes were consolidated into four. The original
thirteen outcomes can be found in Appendix III.
2010 Program Outcomes (Revised in December 2008, Implemented in September, 2009):
Upon completion of the Associate Degree in Medical Laboratory Technology, the graduate will
be able to demonstrate entry-level competencies in the following areas of professional practice:
1. Demonstrate proficiency in the areas of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical
processes in all disciplines of the clinical laboratory.
2. Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed to assure accuracy and validity of test
results by clinical correlation and quality control performance.
3. Exhibit the professional attitudes and behaviors that are necessary for gaining and
maintaining the confidence of the health care community.
4. Meet requirements to take a national certifying examination for Medical Laboratory
Technicians.
Departmental Mission Statement
The Allied Health Professions Department is committed to providing accessible professional
healthcare programs through quality curricula that meet rigorous accreditation standards. These
technical programs maintain currency in content and advance as technology does. The
programs are offered for students and in collaboration with the support of the clinical
community. This community will be provided with graduates that possess the knowledge, skills
and behaviors that are consistent with those of entry level practitioners in each of the specific
disciplines.
MLT Program Mission Statement
To prepare and graduate competent entry-level Medical Laboratory Technicians who
demonstrate professional behaviors and technical skills in a variety of clinical settings, meeting
the expectations of area employers.
Description of the Program
Clinical laboratory professionals perform laboratory tests, evaluate, correlate and assure
accuracy and validity of the test data.
The MLT Program is a seven consecutive quarter program with the first six quarters structured
to provide the student with an orderly and identifiable sequence of general education and basic
related courses, integrated with technical (professional) courses. The technical courses consist
of didactic online theory courses and face-to-face laboratory experience. The MLT Program
offers both an on-campus option and a distance learning laboratory experience option. The oncampus students gain laboratory experience in clinically equipped teaching laboratories on the
college campus. The distance learning students gain their laboratory experience at sponsoring
5
full service clinical hospital laboratories. Off-campus laboratory activities are facilitated by MLT
Program faculty. The courses are designed to provide the necessary theoretical knowledge and
procedural skills in all major areas of clinical practice to prepare the student to successfully
progress to the clinical practicum.
During the seventh and final quarter of the program, the clinical practicum provides the students
with an opportunity to refine their skills, practice advanced clinical procedures and broaden
exposure to instrumentation and laboratory information systems in each clinical area.
Laboratory professionals employed by the clinical facilities are responsible for the clinical
instruction, supervision, and evaluation of students during clinical experience. The Clinical
Practicum Manual rotation objectives and checklists ensure consistency in training between the
clinical sites.
Description of the students enrolled in the program
Admission statistics that include the Spring 2007, Spring 2008, and Spring 2009 program
admission data has revealed that 79 students have been admitted to the program. Of those 79
students:
 33 % male and 67% female
 32% black
 5% Asian
 2.5% Hispanic
 58% White Caucasian
 2.5% Other
Courses that support the program other than the program being evaluated.
A number of Arts and Science courses are included in the MLT Plan of Study. The basic
courses included in the degree program are: BIO 121/122 (Human Anatomy, Physiology), BIO
215 (General Microbiology), MATH 135 (Statistics), and a basic elective course.
Specific industries or businesses served by the program
The MLT Program serves the clinical laboratory industry which currently includes 18 area
hospitals, clinics, and reference laboratories. The majority of the MLT Program students are
hired at these facilities at the completion of the AAS.MLT degree. A complete listing of the
clinical facilities that have an affiliation agreement with the MLT Program is listed in table format
in Appendix VIII of this document.
Institutions where students from the program transfer
Approximately 30% of the CSCC MLT Program graduates choose to further their education and
complete a baccalaureate degree and sit for the MLS (Medical Laboratory Science) Certification
examination. OSU and the University of Cincinnati are the two learning institutions that are
most often chosen by the CSCC MLT graduates. Articulation of credits have assisted and
promoted B.S. degree completion.
6
Emerging trends in the field or program
Laboratory technologists and laboratory technicians are a top career for 2010, as identified by
U.S. News & World Report’s new annual list of the top 50 careers list. The lab technician career
is third in the healthcare category, after X-ray technician and veterinarian. The analysis was
based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics latest job growth projections for 2008 to 2018. It
highlights occupations that are expected to add jobs above the anticipated 10% average growth
rate over the next decade and which will also provide a better-than-average median income. It is
anticipated that 16% more medical laboratory technicians will be needed between the years
2008-2018. This translates into 25,000 more MLTs needed during this timeframe. Although
hospitals are expected to continue to be the major employer of clinical laboratory workers,
employment is expected to grow rapidly in medical and diagnostic laboratories, physician
offices, and all other ambulatory healthcare services.
In 2009, the National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences (NAACLS), reports
that clinical laboratory programs are one of the allied health professions programs recently
affected by program closure. Clinical laboratory programs across the nation have closed due to
dwindling enrollments which exacerbate the current labor shortage, and the projected future
need. These threats have prompted the promotion of strategies to off-set the shortages. These
strategies include 1) the increase in distance learning alternatives to the traditional programs, 2)
offering “refresher” courses to assist clinical affiliates with staffing needs or to lure non-working
technicians back to the field, 3) partnering with other programs, 4) offering opportunities to enter
the field, and 5) proactively focus on student retention. The Medical Laboratory Technology
Faculty has responded to this crisis by proactively implementing strategies outlined by NAACLS
that have led to significant developments since the last validation report.
Significant developments since the last validation report
In response to the emergent clinical laboratory industry trends, the Medical Laboratory
Technology Faculty implemented the following developments since the last validation report:
1) The MLT Program is now available though a distance learning format.
2) Online “Refresher” courses are offered each quarter for clinical laboratory
professionals.
3) A certificate program (effective Autumn 2010) has been approved that serves several
purposes
 Provides a pathway to entry-level clinical laboratory positions
 Stackability: Provides an alternative pathway to the following degrees at CSCC:
AAS in Medical Laboratory Technology, AAS in MultiCompetency Health, and AS
degree in the Medical Technology Pre-Major.
4) Two additional courses were revised for TAG approval (easing the way for MLT
students to obtain a bachelor’s degree). In addition, the MLT Faculty are working with
the curriculum coordinator for Arts & Sciences to include these courses in the Plan of
Study for the Medical Technology 2+2 Pre-Major.
5) MLT Faculty are actively involved in student retention initiatives.
Plan of Study
The MLT Program currently has a seven 10-week term Plan of Study. A copy of the MLT POS
can be found in Appendix IX of this document.
7
Section 2: Review Resources
Adequacy of the program resources and their impact on Student learning
The physical facilities are the same as were in existence for the past 25 years and continue to
remain a major strength of the program. The two MLT teaching laboratories have approximately
3,000 square feet total, can seat 32 students in each laboratory, and have adequate facilities for
storage and instruction. Both laboratories are equipped with the necessary safety equipment to
be consistent with industry standards. Each laboratory is equipped with an eyewash station,
safety shower, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, spill kit, and MSDS binders. A flammable cabinet
is located in one of the laboratories.
A specimen preparation room that has approximately 500 square feet connects the two
laboratories with a small adjoining room that houses the department library, supplementary
material, and instructional equipment. A first aid kit and a fire extinguisher are located in the
specimen preparation room.
All classrooms are of sufficient size for the maximum number of students accepted into the
program. Classrooms are equipped with overhead projectors and screens and several
classrooms are wired with computers and LCD projectors for Internet access and Power Point
presentations. In addition, the MLT Program has a cart with a computer and LCD projector that
may be utilized for classroom and laboratory sessions.
Program faculty and staff have sufficient office space to meet the needs of the faculty
responsibilities including advising of the students enrolled in the program.
On an annual basis the college accepts requests for capital equipment for the purchase of
instructional equipment, educational software site licenses, safety and security, and/or items
that the program budget cannot support. The MLT Program is fortunate, in these lean times in
higher education to have funds for the purchase of supplies and equipment to support a quality
educational experience for the students. The college has fully supported this program since its
inception in April 1, 1978.
Continuing education of faculty has contributed significantly to the success of the program.
Attending external technical workshops and seminars given by industry experts has contributed
to the ongoing update of MLT Program technical courses. Resources for these educational
opportunities have been exemplary. In addition to participating in the external technical
continuing education, the opportunities to participate in CSCC sponsored courses has also
benefited both full time and part time faculty. The opportunities to participate in these events
have enhanced teaching excellence in the program.
Action Items related to the resources
The MLT Program resources are sufficient to effectively teach students.
8
Section 3: Validation of Program Outcomes
External Measures
ASCP-BOC Certification Exam Scores
The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) evaluates the competence of
clinical laboratory professionals. To become certified as an MLT, the ASCP Board of
Certification Examination (ASCP-BOC) requires that a student graduate from a NAACLS
accredited program. The certification exam is designed to assess an individual’s
performance in 7 laboratory areas: Blood Bank, Clinical Chemistry, Hematology,
Immunology, Laboratory Operations, Microbiology, and Urinalysis.
Results
CSCC MLT student overall certification scores for the past three years have been higher
than the national average. Sixteen CSCC student scores from the graduating class
were evaluated for this assessment. The average overall CSCC score of the Autumn
term 2009 graduate was 683 compared to the national overall score of 447. Seven
content area competencies were assessed: Blood Banking, Chemistry, Hematology,
Immunology, Laboratory Operations, Microbiology and Urinalysis.
9
10
NAACLS Accreditation
The National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences (NAACLS) accredits
the CSCC MLT Program. In order for the MLT Program to be accredited, the program
must closely follow standards set forth by NAACLS. There are 22 standard
requirements in 7 main categories:
I. Sponsorship
II. Resources
III. Curriculum
IV. Students
V. Operational Policies
VI. Program Evaluation
VII. Maintaining Accreditation
It is imperative that the program follow the standards set forth by NAACLS and be able
to demonstrate that the design of curriculum, learning experiences, and evaluation
instruments support the development of MLT Program outcomes.
The MLT Program has been accredited by NAACLS since April 1, 1978. Reaccreditation is required every 5 to 7 years and is dependent on the results and
recommendation of the paper review and site visit. Paper reviewers and site visit teams
assist in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the educational standards.
Accreditation is a two-step process:
1. The Self-Study document addresses compliance with NAACLS Program Standards
including curricular content and instructional design. The most recent Self-Study
was submitted to NAACLS for review in May 2010. The Site Visit has been
tentatively scheduled for October 2010.
2. The Site Visit process requires NAACLS trained peer MLT evaluators to visit the
campus to verify the Self-Study report, review additional documents and assess the
program quality on site. The most recent site visit took place in August 2003. At that
time, the site visit team:
 Evaluated the manner in which course outcomes and course sequencing are
designed to demonstrate entry-level competencies in all areas of professional
practice.
 Reviewed course materials and evaluation methods in each subject area to
ensure they are linked to current relevant program outcomes.
 Interviewed MLT Advisory Committee members and employers to verify evidence
of community input into aspects of the MLT Program/curriculum with regard to its
current and relative effectiveness and assessment activities.
 Verified that program outcome measures are documented, analyzed, used in
program evaluation, and reflected in ongoing curriculum and program
modifications. Examples of outcome measures include results of graduate
follow-up surveys, employer surveys, and national certification exam scores.
Accreditation Results
The MLT Program was granted full re-accreditation (7 years) through April 2011 by the
review committee. This external review process indicates that the MLT Program
11
continues to meet the established educational standards set forth by NAACLS and is
comparable to other accredited MLT Programs.
MLT Advisory Committee Meetings
The MLT Advisory Committee members have been and continue to be active
participants in the MLT Program by providing valuable feedback, evaluation, and
guidance as required by NAACLS. They advise the program faculty regarding program
processes, outcomes, curriculum content, recruitment, and assessment. The members
of the committee include clinical laboratory professionals from clinical affiliates who
provide professional practice opportunities to the CSCC MLT students.
The most recent MLT Advisory Committee meeting was held on June 8, 2010. A round
table discussion indicated that the CSCC MLT Program graduates are considered
competent entry-level professionals. The Committee members indicated they actively
seek the CSCC graduates for employment. The MLT Program continues to have strong
support from the clinical affiliates. A copy of the June 8, 2010 meeting agenda and
minutes can be found in Appendix III.
Employer Survey Questions and Results:
Employer follow-up surveys were administered via a paper survey in 2009 and online to
the MLT advisory committee members in June 2010. Three areas were evaluated:
Educational Preparation Evaluation, Overall Rating of the Educational Preparation, and
Relative Educational Preparation. Survey results for 2009 and 2010 are as follows:
2009 Responses (7 total)
Rating Skill Competency
Scores:
5 = Very Good, 4 = Good, 3 = Adequate, 2 = Poor 1= Very Poor
Competency
Technical Knowledge
Work Attitude
Work Quality
Critical Thinking
Problem Solving:
Reasoning
Problem Solving:
Mathematics
Effective Communication
Recognizes Value of
Human Diversity
Interpersonal Skills
Able to read and listen
with understanding
Overall rating of
Educational Preparation
2008 Results
4.4
4.3
4.2
3.8
4.1
2009 Results
4.8
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.4
2010 Results
4.4
4.3
4.6
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.3
3.8
3.8
4.6
4.4
4.9
4.1
4.3
4.8
4.6
4.3
4.7
4.2
4.3
4.1
4.7
4.4
12
Relative Preparation Compared to Other Programs:
Scores: 3=Better Prepared, 2 = Same, 1 = Less Prepared, N/A = No basis for comparison
Competency
Relative Preparation Compared to Other
Programs
2008
Overall
Score
2.0
2009
Overall
Score
2.4
2010
Overall
Score
2.2
13
Internal Measures
Potential Graduate Survey: In the 7th quarter of the program, potential graduates are
asked to complete a confidential survey to determine if the program appropriately
prepared them for their clinical rotation experience and employment. This survey
provides feedback pertaining to perceived program effectiveness and
appropriateness of program outcomes.
Results of Question: How did the MLT Program at CSCC prepare you for the
clinical experience in the following areas?
Rating: 4 = Excellent, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor
Area of Rotation
Autumn
Grads
2007 Spring 2008 Autumn
Grads
Grads
2008 Autumn 2009
Chemistry
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.6
Hematology
3.8
3.7
3.3
3.7
Microbiology
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
Immunohematology
3.9
3.9
3.7
3.9
General Lab Skills
3.2
3.7
3.4
3.6
Professional
Attitudes
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.7
Two additional Questions: Scores: 4 = Excellent, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor
Autumn 2007 Spring 2008
Autumn 2008
Autumn 2009
Grads
Grads
Grads
Grads
How well do you feel
the MLT Program has
prepared you for
prospective
employment?
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.6
Based on your
experience with the
college, would you
recommend
Columbus State to a
friend or relative
seeking a quality
education?
11/11
students said
yes
11/11 students
said yes
7/7 students
said yes
14/15 said yes
1 said uncertain
14
Annual Post Graduate Follow-Up Survey Questions and Results: Graduates are surveyed
approximately 6 months after graduation to determine if the program met the graduates' goals in
obtaining employment and preparing them for their profession. The appropriateness of general
education and basic related support courses is a component of the survey as well as program
strengths and weaknesses (complaints).
The following table depicts the MLT student graduate survey results pertaining to preparation for
employment: Rating Scale: 4 = Excellent, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor
Area of Rotation
2007 Grads (13
surveys sent/10
responses)
2008 Grads (8
surveys sent/2
responses)
2009 Grads (16
surveys sent/11
responses)
Chemistry
3.1
3.0
3.5
Hematology
3.6
3.5
3.7
Microbiology
3.4
3.0
3.6
Immunohematology
3.8
3.0
3.7
General Lab Skills
3.6
4.0
3.6
Professional
Attitudes
3.5
4.0
3.8
Immunology
3.6
Not included in survey
Venipuncture
3.6
No response
3.3
Not included in survey
Not included in survey
3.4
3.7
3.0
3.7
Body Fluids
Overall Preparation
for Employment
Not included in
survey
Other survey questions:
Question
Autumn 2007 Grads
2008 Grads
Autumn 2009
Employment status
9/10 = 90%
2/2 = 100%
9/11 = 81%
Pursuing a higher
degree
7/10 = 70%
2/2 = 100%
8/11 = 72%
11/11 = 100% said
they would
2/2 = 100% said
they would
11/11 = 100% said
they would
Would you
recommend the
program to others?
15
Mock Registry Final Comprehensive Exam:
In addition to taking a final exam at the
completion of each course, the students are required to pass a mock registry examination
with a score of 75% or greater in order to pass the capstone course: Med Lab Case Studies.
The MLT student takes this course during the last quarter of the program.
Results: 100% of the MLT students have passed the Mock Registry Examination in the
past three years. 98% (47) passed on the first attempt and 2% (1) passed on the
second attempt.
MLT Technical Refresher Courses: MLT Refresher courses serve the community by offering
continuing education opportunities to individuals who are currently certified or eligible for
certification. Since the inception of refresher courses in 2009, 26 students have registered for
one or more refresher classes. A total of 29 classes have been or are currently being taken.
These numbers have been used to validate two of the program outcomes: .


Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed to assure accuracy and validity of test
results by clinical correlation and quality control performance.
Meet requirements to take a national certifying examination for Medical Laboratory
Technicians
Recommendations
Results of the validation process seem to indicate that the program outcomes continue to be
valid and relevant to clinical community needs. The assessment methods and results support
the conclusion that the program graduates are competent entry-level Medical Laboratory
Technicians upon graduation from the CSCC MLT Program.
Action Items
To maintain currency, the MLT Clinical Practicum Checklists are being reviewed by the clinical
affiliates. Recommended changes will be incorporated into the Autumn 2010 Clinical Practicum
rotation.
In an effort to ensure the program assessments are aligned with program outcomes and course
goals, the MLT faculty members have revised (and are continuing to revise) all technical
outlines and test questions to reflect current best practice.
In the future, the Employer Survey will include questions directly linked to the program
outcomes and care will be taken to ensure all technical courses are included in the survey.
Formative and Summative Chart: The MLT Program F/S chart can be found in Appendix X.
16
Section 4: Implication of Results and Specific Plans for Revision of
Curriculum and/or Program Outcomes
Action Plan
There are no plans to revise the MLT Program Outcomes at this time.
For the next program validation, the Medical Laboratory Technology Program faculty plan to
invite area experts to further validate curricula by participating in the DACUM (Developing a
Curriculum) process. In addition, a questionnaire will be developed to survey the Clinical
Laboratory Science programs at University of Cincinnati and Ohio State University to determine
the relative preparedness of CSCC Program students compared to other programs.
The MLT Program faculty members convene annually to perform a SWOT analysis and develop
an action plan for the subsequent year. Please refer to the 2010 MLT SWOT meeting minutes
below:
MLT Program SWOT Analysis and Action Plan
1-25-10
Summary
A review of the Action Plan from 2007 showed that all actionable items were achieved except for the student
recognition. This is re-addressed in the new Action Plan for 2010-2012.
Strengths Identified
Over the past two years, the MLT program faculty developed a good working knowledge of teaching and presenting
in the face-to-face and online formats with the use of new technology and software. This allows for efficient course
updating and continued course development. In addition, the MLT program faculty members have the resources
needed to maintain and update courses in order to provide the relevant laboratory training required by the key
stakeholders (primarily students and clinical affiliates). This will help to facilitate a smooth transition toward the
future semester conversion process.
The MLT website has been updated with information regarding our current offerings for inquiring students. The
website has been identified as the main marketing tool for the program.
Weaknesses
The major weaknesses that impact the MLT program are



Gen. Micro and General Chemistry are still unavailable in a web format. This creates a barrier for
the MLT Program Distance Learning Format.
The need for adjunct faculty to assist in entry-level courses (Hematology I Lab and Intro to the
MLT Lab) where there are 25 students in each class.
There will be a learning curve when using SoftChalk for our courses.
Opportunities
The opportunities include
 Continued improvement of all courses.
 Development of other new programs or courses.
 Professional growth stemming from the new opportunities.
17
Threats
Potential threats include
 Unanticipated problems related to the economy.
 Unanticipated problems related to optimally serving students during the transition from quarters
to semesters.
18
From the SWOT, the following Action Plan Was Created
What Action?
1.
Maintain Website
2.
Re-open
conversations
regarding Gen
Micro (BIO 215)
and Chem (113) to
be converted to
online formats
3.
4.
5.
6.
Update Courses
Re-vise MLT 100
using Soft Chalk
Train on new
equipment for
MLT 261
Semester
Conversion
Successful
implementation of
CLA
How accomplished?
Keeping website update
and current on a
quarterly basis or as
needed.
Meeting with
appropriate Chair (Larry
Mayer?)
8.
Metrics or deliverables
Sandy and MaryEllen
On-going
Increased activity in the form
of requests for information or
applications
Connie Grossman
Spring Quarter 2011
Gen Micro and Gen Chem
Courses available online to
the MLT Program students
Revised online version of
MLT 100 available with the
use of Soft Chalk
Finding other
institutions that will
provide these courses
for MLT program
students online.
Sandy to get input from
adjunct faculty
regarding objective
writing.
Sandy Arrighi/
MaryEllen Tancred
Sandra Arrighi
Fall 2011
MaryEllen to attend
Vitros training in
Rochester, NY
MaryEllen Tancred
Fall 2011
Waiting for more
information: Needs its
own SWOT
Sandy
Arrighi/MaryEllen
Tancred
MaryEllen Tancred
Fall 2012
MaryEllen Tancred
Spring 2010
MaryEllen Tancred
Winter 2011
Start an MLT Club
MaryEllen Tancred
Summer 2011
All paperwork and approvals
completed
Create a service learning
course
MaryEllen Tancred
Fall 2011 to submit for
MCI change
Offer by Fall 2012
Development of CLA
100 and CLA 101
courses.
Obtaining of capital
equipment needed for
this project.
Provide more ways
for student
engagement and
recognition
Create new
offerings
Completed by?
Or
Advertising of CLA
through the program
website and bulletin
board. Will also contact
other programs
(phlebotomy, for
example) to notify their
students of this
opportunity.
7.
Who owns this?
Students begin training on
new equipment.
Courses ready
Winter 2011
Course completion
Appendices to Follow
19
Appendix I
Standards of Accredited Educational Programs for the Clinical Laboratory
Technician/Medical Laboratory Technician
(Retrieved from the NAACLS website on 6/21/2010)
DESCRIPTION OF THE CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE PROFESSION
The clinical laboratory professional is qualified by academic and applied science education to
provide service and research in clinical laboratory science and related areas in rapidly changing
and dynamic healthcare delivery systems. Clinical laboratory professionals perform, develop,
evaluate, correlate and assure accuracy and validity of laboratory information; direct and
supervise clinical laboratory resources and operations; and collaborate in the diagnosis and
treatment of patients. The clinical laboratory professional has diverse and multi-level functions
in the areas of analysis and clinical decision-making, information management, regulatory
compliance, education, and quality assurance/performance improvement wherever laboratory
testing is researched developed or performed. Clinical laboratory professionals possess skills
for financial, operations, marketing, and human resource management of the clinical laboratory.
Clinical laboratory professionals practice independently and collaboratively, being responsible
for their own actions, as defined by the profession. They have the requisite knowledge and
skills to educate laboratory professionals, other health care professionals, and others in
laboratory practice as well as the public.
The ability to relate to people, a capacity for calm and reasoned judgment and a demonstration
of commitment to the patient are essential qualities. Communications skills extend to
consultative interactions with members of the healthcare team, external relations, customer
service and patient education. Laboratory professionals demonstrate ethical and moral
attitudes and principles that are necessary for gaining and maintaining the confidence of
patients, professional associates and the community.
DESCRIPTION OF CAREER ENTRY OF THE CLINICAL LABORATORY
TECHNICIAN/MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNICIAN
At career entry, the clinical laboratory technician/medical laboratory technician will be able to
perform routine clinical laboratory tests (such as hematology, clinical chemistry,
immunohematology, microbiology, serology/immunology, coagulation, molecular, and other
emerging diagnostics) as the primary analyst making specimen oriented decisions on
predetermined criteria, including a working knowledge of critical values. Communications skills
will extend to frequent interactions with members of the healthcare team, external relations,
customer service and patient education. The level of analysis ranges from waived and point of
care testing to complex testing encompassing all major areas of the clinical laboratory. The
clinical laboratory technician/medical laboratory technician will have diverse functions in areas
of pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical processes. The clinical laboratory
technician/medical laboratory technician will have responsibilities for information processing,
training, and quality control monitoring wherever clinical laboratory testing is performed.
20
Appendix II
Annual MLT Program results (including sub-content areas) for 2007-2009
BOC Program Performance Report Summary for 2007
Mean Scaled Scores by Subtest For First Time Examinees
BBNK CHEM HEMA IMMU LO
MICR UA
Program Mean Scaled Scores:
563
638
631
499
512
582
679
This Cycle Mean Scaled Scores:
500
503
500
473
507
496
497
First Time Examinees From The Total Population This Cycle
Program
National
Number of Examinees
11
1800
Mean Scaled Score
600
498
Standard Deviation
85
115
Number Passing (Percent)
11 (100%)
1410 (78.33%)
Number Failing (Percent)
0 (0%)
390 (21.67%)
Minimum Scaled Score Achieved
495
171
Maximum Scaled Score Achieved
738
956
2007 Program and National subcontent area mean scaled scores
The following provides mean scaled scores for your program's First Time examinees on the sub-content areas
of the Medical Laboratory Scientist examination.Scores in the high and low ranges should be interpreted with
caution because they may be based on small numbers of questions and students.The scaled score of 400 can be
used as a criterion for assessing overall performance of your program. Number of First Time exminees: 11
100 represents the minimum scaled score 999 represents the maximum scaled score
Program Mean
Scaled Score
This Cycle Mean
Scaled Score
BLOOD BANK
ABO and Rh
563
516
Antibody screen and identification
528
509
Crossmatch and special tests
477
542
521
518
Carbohydrate/Acid base/Electrolytes
669
522
Proteins and other nitrogen containing compounds
653
498
Enzymes/Lipids/Lipoproteins
664
504
Special chemistry
484
519
630
504
Blood donation, transfusion therapy, transfusion reactions and
hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN)
CHEMISTRY
HEMATOLOGY
Erythrocytes and leukocytes
21
Other tests
504
505
Morphology and differential
767
535
Platelets and hemostasis
568
511
Immunity
544
481
Infectious diseases
283
508
General bacteriology and aerobic gram-positive cocci
607
519
Aerobic gram-negative bacilli
634
501
Gram negative cocci, gram-positive bacilli and anaerobes
442
535
Fungus, viruses mycobacteria and parasites
542
504
Urinalysis
699
501
Other body fluids
483
555
513
509
IMMUNOLOGY
MICROBIOLOGY
URINALYSIS AND OTHER BODY FLUIDS
LABORATORY OPERATIONS
BOC Program Performance Report Summary for 2008
Mean Scaled Scores by Subtest For First Time Examinees
BBNK CHEM HEMA IMMU LO
MICR UA
Program Mean Scaled Scores:
583
637
632
536
576
622
602
This Cycle Mean Scaled Scores:
502
501
501
482
503
491
497
First Time Examinees From The Total Population This Cycle
Program
National
Number of Examinees
26
1859
Mean Scaled Score
609
497
Standard Deviation
142
119
Number Passing (Percent)
24 (92.31%)
1451 (78.05%)
Number Failing (Percent)
2 (7.69%)
408 (21.95%)
Minimum Scaled Score Achieved
213
113
Maximum Scaled Score Achieved
906
942
22
2008 Annual Program and National subcontent area mean scaled scores
The following provides mean scaled scores for your program's First Time examinees on the sub-content areas
of the Medical Laboratory Scientist examination.Scores in the high and low ranges should be interpreted with
caution because they may be based on small numbers of questions and students.The scaled score of 400 can be
used as a criterion for assessing overall performance of your program. Number of First Time exminees: 26
100 represents the minimum scaled score. 999 represents the maximum scaled score
Program Mean
Scaled Score
This Cycle Mean
Scaled Score
BLOOD BANK
ABO and Rh
571
521
Antibody screen and identification
612
524
Crossmatch and special tests
618
545
599
515
Carbohydrate/Acid base/Electrolytes
656
519
Proteins and other nitrogen containing compounds
662
500
Enzymes/Lipids/Lipoproteins
660
508
Special chemistry
488
531
Erythrocytes and leukocytes
635
505
Other tests
546
517
Morphology and differential
675
527
Platelets and hemostasis
581
509
Immunity
523
490
Infectious diseases
536
519
General bacteriology and aerobic gram-positive cocci
601
512
Aerobic gram-negative bacilli
726
497
Gram negative cocci, gram-positive bacilli and anaerobes
551
523
Fungus, viruses mycobacteria and parasites
547
487
Urinalysis
616
503
Other body fluids
571
539
577
505
Blood donation, transfusion therapy, transfusion reactions and
hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN)
CHEMISTRY
HEMATOLOGY
IMMUNOLOGY
MICROBIOLOGY
URINALYSIS AND OTHER BODY FLUIDS
LABORATORY OPERATIONS
23
BOC Program Performance Report Summary for 2009
Mean Scaled Scores by Subtest For First Time Examinees
BBNK CHEM HEMA IMMU LO
MICR UA
Program Mean Scaled Scores:
577
569
622
568
601
619
603
This Cycle Mean Scaled Scores:
495
500
495
473
503
488
496
First Time Examinees From The Total Population This Cycle
Program
National
Number of Examinees
12
2023
Mean Scaled Score
592
493
Standard Deviation
129
120
Number Passing (Percent)
11 (92%)
1543 (76.27%)
Number Failing (Percent)
1 (8%)
480 (23.73%)
Minimum Scaled Score Achieved
317
159
Maximum Scaled Score Achieved
768
968
All Examinees this cycle
National
Number of Examinees
2352
Mean Scaled Score
479
Standard Deviation
120
Number Passing (Percent)
1700 (72.28%)
Number Failing (Percent)
652 (27.72%)
Minimum Scaled Score Achieved
159
Maximum Scaled Score Achieved
968
24
2009 Program and National subcontent area mean scaled scores
The following provides mean scaled scores for your program's First Time examinees on the sub-content areas
of the Medical Laboratory Scientist examination.Scores in the high and low ranges should be interpreted with
caution because they may be based on small numbers of questions and students. The scaled score of 400 can
be used as a criterion for assessing overall performance of your program. Number of First Time exminees: 12
100 represents the minimum scaled score. 999 represents the maximum scaled score
Program Mean
Scaled Score
This Cycle Mean
Scaled Score
BLOOD BANK
ABO and Rh
519
509
Antibody screen and identification
686
502
Crossmatch and special tests
455
542
606
516
Carbohydrate/Acid base/Electrolytes
531
517
Proteins and other nitrogen containing compounds
563
499
Enzymes/Lipids/Lipoproteins
663
500
Special chemistry
582
538
Erythrocytes and leukocytes
632
497
Other tests
754
516
Morphology and differential
609
532
Platelets and hemostasis
502
490
Immunity
570
482
Infectious diseases
515
512
General bacteriology and aerobic gram-positive cocci
665
503
Aerobic gram-negative bacilli
732
496
Gram negative cocci, gram-positive bacilli and anaerobes
597
531
Fungus, viruses mycobacteria and parasites
534
484
Urinalysis
604
498
Other body fluids
744
568
602
504
Blood donation, transfusion therapy, transfusion reactions and
hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN)
CHEMISTRY
HEMATOLOGY
IMMUNOLOGY
MICROBIOLOGY
URINALYSIS AND OTHER BODY FLUIDS
LABORATORY OPERATIONS
25
Appendix III
Revised Program Outcomes
2007 Program Outcomes
1
Collection and processing of biological specimens for
analysis.
2
Performance of analytical tests and statistical
calculations on body fluids, cells, and products
related to all routine areas of the clinical laboratory.
3
Recognition of factors that affect procedures and
results, and take appropriate action within
predetermined parameters.
Performance and monitoring quality control to
evaluate analytical procedures within predetermined
parameters.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Revised Program Outcomes
Revised in 2008, Implemented in 2009
Demonstrate proficiency in the areas of preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical
processes in all disciplines of the clinical
laboratory. .
Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed
to assure accuracy and validity of test results
by clinical correlation and quality control
performance.
Exhibit the professional attitudes and behaviors
that are necessary for gaining and maintaining
the confidence of the health care community
Meet requirements to take a national certifying
examination for Medical Laboratory
Technicians
Performance of operation and preventive and
corrective maintenance of routine laboratory
equipment and instruments by referring to appropriate
sources/reference materials for repairs.
Recognition and adherence to established safety
policies.
Demonstration of professional conduct and
interpersonal communication skills with patients,
laboratory personnel, other health care professionals,
and the public.
Recognition of the responsibilities of other laboratory
and health care personnel and interacting with them
with respect for their jobs and patient care.
Application of basic scientific principles in learning
new techniques and procedures.
Utilization of the keyboard to interact with
computerized instruments and laboratory information
systems to keep accurate records, prepare reports,
and transmit reports clearly and completely.
Relationship of laboratory findings to common
disease processes.
Recognition and action upon one’s need for
continuing education as a function of growth and
maintenance of professional competence.
Meet requirements to take a national certifying
examination for medical laboratory technicians. (This
outcome is listed in the CSCC Course Catalog but not
in the MLT Student Handbook)
26
Appendix III
Medical Laboratory Technology Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes: MLT Program Outcomes
Date:
Conference Call December 9, 2008 Time: 9:30 am – 10:35 am
Welcome/Introductions/Roll Call Attendance:
CSCC Faculty/Staff: Sandy Arrighi, Program Coordinator, MaryEllen Tancred, Clinical Coordinator,
Peggy Mayo, CSCC Multi-Competency Coordinator, Ryan Mayes, CSCC MLT Adjunct Faculty Member,
Tywan Banks, MLT Adjunct Faculty Member and Teaching Assistant, Connie Grossman, Allied Health
Department Chairperson
Advisory Committee Members: Margaret Goshay, Doctors Hospital, Pat Bennon, Mt. Carmel Medical
Center, Dr. Dorothy Lordo, Ohio Health, Gregg Witham, Fairfield Medical Center, Sue Vonderwell,
American Red Cross, Eric Keifer, Memorial Hospital of Union County
Old Business

The June 2008 meeting minutes were approved by all in attendance.

From this point forward, there will be two CSCC MLT Advisory Committee Meetings held
annually, per CSCC policy.
New Business
In an effort to follow CSCC Program Outcome guidelines, the MLT Proposed Program Outcomes were
revised and the thirteen current outcomes have been consolidated into four outcomes. The purpose of
this conference call meeting is to discuss the proposed outcomes. A final vote will be taken by email at
the conclusion of the meeting. The four proposed outcomes are as follows:
Upon completion of the Associate Degree in Medical Laboratory Technology, the graduate should be able
to demonstrate entry-level competencies in the following areas of professional practice:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Demonstrate proficiency in the areas of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical processes in
all disciplines of the clinical laboratory.
Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed to assure accuracy and validity of test results by
clinical correlation and quality control performance.
Exhibit the professional attitudes and behaviors that are necessary for gaining and maintaining
the confidence of the health care community.
Meet requirements to take a national certifying examination for Medical Laboratory Technicians.
Proposed Program Outcome Voting Results: 8 committee members voted to approve the
proposed outcomes. No one disapproved. 5 faculty/staff members also voted to approve the
proposed outcomes. No one disapproved.
Announcements

Online refresher courses for all areas of rotation are available through the CSCC MLT program
effective January 2009. A flyer will be sent to all laboratory managers after the first of the year.

Autumn 2009 Clinical Practicum class estimated at approximately 20 students. Will need
continued support in order to place the entire class.

FINAL CLOSING REMARKS –Everyone was thanked for taking time out of their busy schedules
to attend and participating in the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 am.
27
Appendix III
Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Medical Laboratory Technology
June 8, 2010
11:00 am – 1:00 pm
Nestor Hall Seminar Room 010
Reason for meeting:
To provide updated program information to clinical affiliates, to gather information to
further the program and to seek affiliates valued advice on current operations.
Agenda topics
Welcome/Introductions
Old Business

Approve Dec 2009 Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes (Please read minutes prior to meeting)
New Business

Annual Program Statistics

Scholarships and Honors

Capital Equipment

Curriculum Topics
o Clinical Lab Assisting Certificate DACUM results
o Semester Conversion
o Introduction to Health Care (MLT 100) course topics
o Updating Clinical Practicum Checklists
Employer Survey (online)
Announcements

Refresher Courses
Thank You for Your Support

13 students will rotate in the Autumn 2010 term. Thank you for supporting this class!

We appreciate your efforts in completing the MLT Accreditation facility documents. The site visit will be
scheduled for October 2010.
28
Appendix IV
Columbus State Community College
Employer Follow-up Questionnaire
1. EDUCATIONAL PREPARATION EVALUATION
Please rate the educational preparation received by the individual in the following areas:
(you may copy and paste this X to use in the tables below)
Very Good
Good
Adequate
Poor
Very Poor
Technical
Knowledge
Work Attitude
Work Quality
Critical
Thinking
Problem
Solving:
Reasoning
Problem
Solving:
Mathematics
Effective
Communication
Recognizes
Value of
Human
Diversity
Interpersonal
Skills
Able to read
and listen with
understanding
2. OVERALL RATING
What is your overall rating of the educational preparation received by this
relates to the requirements of his or her job?
Very Good
Good
Adequate
Poor
individual as it
Very Poor
Overall Rating
3. RELATIVE PREPARATION
As a result of this person’s educational preparation at Columbus State Community College,
how would you rate his or her preparation in relation to other employees in his
or her work group who received their preparation elsewhere?
No Basis for
Comparison
Individual is
Better Prepared
Both are about
the Same
Individual is
Less Prepared
Relative
Preparation
29
Appendix V
MLT Program Curriculum Review Meeting Agenda
Aug 20th, 2007 Curriculum Review Meeting Topics

Discuss ways to better teach the outcome: “Performance of operation and preventive and
corrective maintenance of routine laboratory equipment and instruments by referring to
appropriate sources/reference materials for repairs.”

Look at all outcomes and discuss if any changes are necessary

Possibly changing Intro to Healthcare to 3 credits without a 2 hour lab. (Would require an MCI
change). Case Studies (2 credits) is now online yet it is listed as a 1 hour lecture and 3 hour lab.
CSCC Definition of Laboratory: A laboratory is an educational activity in which students
conduct experiments, perfect skills or practice procedures under the direction of a faculty
member. One credit shall be awarded for a minimum of three hours in a week total time spent in
the lab for which there is little outside preparation needed; or for two in-lab hours with at least
one hour of assignments on out-of-class study preparing for or following-up the laboratory
experience.

Collection and Processing Clinical Practicum Checklist for Clinical Practicum – Talked about at
advisory committee meeting and the members were in favor of a training checklist. Any
additional thoughts on this?

Any other ideas? Feel free to bring them up!
Follow-up The meeting resulted in the following outcomes to be proposed to the Advisory Committee Members
during the December 2008 meeting.
30
Appendix V
MONTHLY MLT DEPARTMENT MEETING – Annual MLT Assessment Meeting
Minutes
September 8, 2008
12:30 pm – 2:00 pm
In Attendance: All MLT fulltime and adjunct faculty members were in attendance: Sandy Arrighi,
MaryEllen Tancred, Peggy Mayo, Julie Dudas, Tywan Banks, and Ryan Mayes. Also in attendance was
Connie Grossman, Allied Health Professions Chairperson.
Agenda Topics:

Review of 2007-2008 Assessment Report:
o Peggy suggested that the Professional Attitudes and Behavior benchmark be worded as
“85% of the students attain an average score of 3 or above” for the Clinical Practicum
Evaluations or “85% of the students Meets Expectations” on the quarterly on-campus
evaluations.
o A discussion provided possible reasons for failure to meet the General Education
“Quantitative Literacy” outcome that was assessed in the MLT 121 course. 57% of
students did not meet the “75% or greater” benchmark on the Math Story Problem exam:
 Ryan suggested providing additional practice problems and to evaluate the test
questions to determine if certain questions were missed more often than other
questions, in other words, check for trends.
 Julie and Peggy indicated that story problems require a higher level learning than
multiple choice questions. For this reason, she suggested that the assessment
of this type of outcome take place later in the program, such as in the Chemistry
course during the 3rd term. MaryEllen agreed, indicating that evaluation of this
outcome is appropriate early-on in the program, but assessing it later in the
program is a better assessment of the competency.
Review of 2009-2010 Assessment Plan:
 A number of changes were made to the 2009-2010 Assessment Plan based on faculty
recommendations:
o Two outcomes were removed from next year’s assessment schedule: Utilization of the
keyboard and Recognition and adherence to established safety policies. The reason that
these outcomes were deleted is because both outcomes were recently assessed in some
fashion.
o Faculty provided feedback on methods of assessments that would be appropriate for the
remaining outcomes to be assessed.
o The General Education Quantitative Literacy outcome will once again be assessed in
MLT 121 the next time the course is offered (Summer of 2009).

Connie will be following up on whether the MLT Program should assess MLT 100, which is a
prerequisite course, and MULT 116, which is part of the MLT Program but is offered by the MultiCompetency Program.
31
Proposed Revisions to MLT Program Outcome (Round Table Discussion):

Per CSCC assessment recommendations, the MLT faculty reviewed the current program
outcomes (of which there are 13) in an attempt to reduce and consolidate the number of
outcomes without compromising the program. A round table discussion resulted in the following
proposed revisions to the MLT Program Outcomes: Upon completion of the Associate Degree in
Medical Laboratory Technology, the graduate should be able to demonstrate entry-level
competencies in the following areas of professional practice:
o
o
o
o

Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed to perform, develop, evaluate, correlate
and assure accuracy and validity of laboratory information and apply the knowledge to
basic scientific principles.
Demonstrate the ability to perform routine pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical
clinical tests and processes in the following areas: Hematology, Clinical Chemistry,
Immunohematology, Microbiology, Serology/Immunology, Coagulation, Body Fluids, and
other emerging technologies.
Demonstrate the professional attitudes and behaviors that are needed for gaining and
maintaining the confidence of patients, professional associates, and the community.
Meet eligibility requirements to take a Medical Laboratory Technician national certifying
examination and demonstrate knowledge of the continuing education requirements to
maintain certification.
Processes involved in the writing of these outcomes included:
o Correlating the outcomes to the Standards of Accredited Educational Programs for the
CLT/MLT NAACLS document.
o Checking to make sure that the prior 13 outcomes are addressed in the proposed
outcomes.
o Julie stated that other MLT Program outcomes should be reviewed prior to presenting the
outcomes to the MLT Advisory Committee for review and approval. Sandy will research
other program outcomes and suggest additions to the MLT faculty if needed upon
completion.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:00 pm.
32
Appendix VI
CSCC Medical Laboratory Technology
Potential Graduate Survey
1.
Upon Graduation, what will be your employment status?
________
Not Employed – (skip to #4)
________
Employed – Part Time
________
Employed – Full Time
2.
To what extent will this job be related to your program of study at Columbus State?
________
________
________
3.
Not Related
Somewhat Related
Directly Related
What is the name of the organization where you will be employed?
________________________________________________________________________
4.
If you will not be employed, or will be employed in a job not related to your field of study at
Columbus State, which of the following applies?
________
I will be seeking employment related to my field of study.
________
I will be seeking employment not related to my field of study.
________
I will not be seeking employment soon after graduation.
________
I will not be employed but have interviews scheduled for a job
related to my field of study.
5.
Are you currently planning to continue your formal education?
________
Not certain
________
No
________
Yes
6.
If you are planning to continue your formal education, indicate what college/university and degree
goals:
College/University: ___________________________________
Degree Goals:
7.
_______________________________________
How well did the Medical Laboratory Technology program at CSCC prepare you for the clinical
experience in the following areas: (Indicate poor, fair, good, excellent)
Immunology ________________________________________
Body Fluids ________________________________________
Chemistry
________________________________________
Hematology
________________________________________
Microbiology
________________________________________
Blood Bank
________________________________________
General Lab Skills (Math, Pipetting etc) ____________________
Professional Attitudes __________________________________
Suggestions for Improvement in the Program:
_____________________________________________________
33
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
8.
How well do you feel the MLT program has prepared you for prospective employment?
Poor preparation ________
Fair preparation ________
Good preparation ________
Excellent preparation
________
9.
Based on your experience with the college, would you recommend Columbus State to a friend or
relative seeking a quality education?
Not Certain
No
Yes
________
________
________
10. Do you feel that: (Check any statements that you agree with):
________
________
MLT evaluation policies were administered fairly and consistently
Students were allowed to pass even though they did not exhibit the
skills, and/or attitudes necessary for successful employment.
________
The demonstration of professional attitudes in the classroom is as
important as the demonstration of knowledge and skills when
faculty evaluate a student’s ability to perform in their clinical
experience.
________
The program was unnecessarily difficult and the content and/or
evaluation methods should be made easier to allow more students
to complete the program.
11. List the characteristics that you feel are essential to be successful in the Medical Laboratory field:
34
Appendix VII
CSCC MLT Program Post Graduation Survey
We would greatly appreciate it if you take a few moments to respond to the attached survey. Your feedback
will help us evaluate the existing MLT program and to modify the courses to better meet student needs and
the needs of the clinical facilities.
12. What is your current employment status?
________
Not Employed
________
Employed – Part Time as an MLT
________
Employed – Full Time as an MLT
________
Employed but not as an MLT
13. To what extent is this job related to your program of study at Columbus State?
________
________
________
Not Related
Somewhat Related
Directly Related
14. Are you currently planning to continue your formal education?
________
Not certain
________
No
________
Yes
15. If you are planning to continue your formal education, indicate what college/university and degree
goals:
College/University: ___________________________________
Degree Goals:
_______________________________________
16. How well did the Medical Laboratory Technology program at CSCC prepare you for the clinical
experience in the following areas: (Indicate poor, fair, good, excellent)
Chemistry
________________________________________
Hematology
________________________________________
Microbiology
________________________________________
Blood Bank
________________________________________
Body Fluids ________________________________________
Immunology ________________________________________
General Lab Skills (Math, Pipetting etc) ____________________
Professional Attitudes __________________________________
Venipuncture
________________________________________
17. How well do you feel the MLT program has prepared you for prospective employment?
Poor preparation ________
Fair preparation ________
Good preparation ________
Excellent preparation
________
35
18. Based on your experience with the college, would you recommend Columbus State to a friend or
relative seeking a quality education?
Not Certain
No
Yes
________
________
________
19. Do you feel that: (Check the statement that you agree with):
________
MLT evaluation policies were administered fairly and consistently
________
Students were allowed to pass even though they did not exhibit the
Skills, and/or attitudes necessary for successful employment.
________
The demonstration of professional attitudes in the classroom is as
important as the demonstration of knowledge and skills when
faculty evaluate a student’s ability to perform in their clinical
experience.
________
The program was unnecessarily difficult and the content and/or
evaluation methods should be made easier to allow more students
to complete the program.
20. List the characteristics that you feel are essential to be successful in the Medical Laboratory field:
21. Suggestions for Improvement in the Program:
36
Appendix VIII
CLINICAL AFFILIATE
LOCATION
Adena Health System
Berger Health System
Children’s Hospital
Corrections Medical Center
Doctors Hospital OhioHealth
Fairfield Medical Center
Fulton County Health Center
Grady Memorial Hospital
Grant/Riverside OhioHealth
Holzer Clinic
Laboratory Corp of America
Chillocothe, Ohio
Circleville, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Lancaster, Ohio
Wauseon , Ohio
Delaware, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Gallipolis, Ohio
Dublin, Ohio
Licking Memorial Hospital
Madison County Hospital
Memorial Hospital of Union
County
MedCentral Health System
Newark, Ohio
London, Ohio
Marysville, Ohio
AFFILIATE
SINCE:
2003
2006
> 10 years
> 10 years
> 10 years
2007
2008
2008
> 10 years
2009
Affiliate > 10
years
2008
> 10 years
> 10 years
Mansfield, Ohio
2002
Mount Carmel Health System
Ohio State University Hospitals
W. Branch Regional Medical
Center
Columbus, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
West Branch,
Michigan
2000
2000
2010
37
Appendix IX
38
Appendix X
Medical Laboratory Technology F/S Chart Rev. 7/2010
2009-2010 CATALOG
Upon completion of the Associate of Applied Science Degree in
Medical Laboratory Technology the graduate will achieve
competency in:
GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS
ENGL 101
& ENGL
102 OR
ENGL 111
BASIC
REQUIREMENTS
ENGL 200
COMM
105 OR
COMM
110
SSCI
10x
HUM
1xx
1. Demonstrate proficiency in the areas of pre-analytical,
analytical, and post-analytical processes in all disciplines of the
clinical laboratory.
MATH
135
BIO
121
BIO
122
BIO
215
BASIC
F
F
F
F
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
BASIC
F
2. Demonstrate the theoretical knowledge needed to assure
accuracy and validity of test results by clinical correlation and
quality control performance.
3. Exhibit the professional attitudes and behaviors that are
necessary for gaining and maintaining the confidence of the
health care community.
BASIC ELECTIVES
F
F
F
F
F
F
4. Meet requirements to take a national certifying examination for
Medical Laboratory Technicians
Program Outcome 5
Program Outcome 6
Program Outcome 7
GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS
Upon completion of the Medical Laboratory Technology the
graduate will achieve competency in:
ENGL 101
& ENGL
102 OR
ENGL 111
Critical Thinking
F/S
Effective Communication
F/S
Community and Civic Responsibility
F/S
Quantitative Literacy
F
Scientific and Technological Effectiveness
F
Information Literacy
F/S
F/S
F/S
F
F
F
F/S
BASIC
REQUIREMENTS
BASIC ELECTIVES
ENGL 200
COMM
105 OR
COMM
110
SSCI
10x
HUM
1xx
MATH
135
BIO
121
BIO
122
BIO
215
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F
F
F
F/S
F/S
F/S
F
F
F
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
F/S
S
BASIC
F/S
39
Updates to Technical Curricula
Additions
Year Added
Chemistry
Troponin
Myoglobin
PSA
Reverse T3
THBR (Thyroid Hormone Binding Rates)
Copper
Zinc
Ceruoplasmin
Fetal Lung Maturity (Fluorescent Polarization Albumin)
CA 15 – 3
CA – 125
Progesterone
Trace Elements
Hematology
Scattergrams prior to
Factor V Leiden prior to
Mixing Studies prior to
Terminology: Myelocytic Leukemia
instead of Granulocytic Leukemia
ACT (Activated Clotting Time)
d-Dimer
Immunology
PCR
IFE
HIV-I Immunoblotting
Increased Emphasis on Extractable
Nuclear Antigens (ENA)
Microbiology
Gemella
Leuconstoc
Acanthameoba
Naegleria
Schistisoma
Hantavirus
Bartonella
Edwardsiella
Nucleic Acid Probe
Chryseobacterium
Emerging Infectious Diseases (e.g. West Nile virus)
Bioterrorism Agents (e.g. anthracis, smallpox)
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2001
2001
2001
2003
2008
2008
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
2002
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
2003
prior to 2001
UPDATED 12/07
40
Updates to Technical Curricula
Deletions
Year Deleted
Blood Bank
Anti A,B
Donor Adverse Reactions
Donor Requirements for Malaria and
Other Protozoan Diseases
Donor Vaccine Requirements
Du Terminology (replaced with weak D)
Granulocyte Transfusions
Hardy Weinberg Equation
Latin Names
Temperature Recorders
Wiener Nomenclature
Chemistry
Double Beam Spectrophotometers
Flame Photometers
Immunoelectropheresis
Insulin Tolerance
LD Isoenzyme
RIA
Serum Acid Phosphatase
LS Ratio
T3 Uptake
Pepsinogen
Lipoprotein Electrophoresis
Hematology
Osmotic Fragility – procedural questions
Bleeding Time – procedural questions
Acidified Serum for PNH
Immunology
ASO Titer (strep serology is still included)
CH50
Hemagglutination Inhibition
Immunoelectropheresis
RID
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
2001
2001
2003
2008
2008
2008
2008
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
prior to 2001
Please note:
The terminology for Blood Bank examination items is based on current AABB Standards.
UPDATED 12/07
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Medical Laboratory Technology Program Learning Outcomes Validation Report
Table of Contents
Title Page…………………………………………………………….
Cover
Executive Summary …………………………………………………
2
Section 1: Introduction to the Program……………………………
5
Section 2: Review Resources…………………………………….
8
Section 3: Validation of Program Outcomes…………………….
9
Section 4: Implication of Results and Specific Plans for Revision
of Curriculum and/or Program Outcomes……………
17
Appendices: Documents of Evidence
Appendix 1: Accrediting Agency MLT Profession Description, ASCP
Examination Content Guidelines, and Addition and Deletion List for BOC
Exam
Appendix 2: Board of Certification Annual Program Performance Reports
Appendix 3: MLT Program Outcomes, and MLT Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda and Meeting Minutes (Program Outcome Voting Results)
Appendix 4: MLT Program Employer Questionnaire
Appendix 5: MLT Program Meeting Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Appendix 6: MLT Program Potential Graduate Survey
Appendix 7: MLT Program Post Graduation Survey
Appendix 8: List of MLT Program Clinical Affiliates
Appendix 9: MLT Program Plan of Study
Appendix 10: MLT Program F/S Charts
48