university of phoenix - West-Point.ORG, The West Point Connection

advertisement
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX
CMGT 410
PROJECT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
Module Code cmgt410r1
Course
Description:
Location:
This course provides the foundation for understanding the broad concepts
of successful planning, organization, and implementation within the realm
of information technology. This course uses real-world examples and
identifies common mistakes and pitfalls in project management. Topics
covered include project scoping, estimating, budgeting, scheduling,
tracking and controlling.
Tempe Campus (Group TJL02M)
-- AND -Mesa Campus (Group MJL02T)
Mondays, 6 p.m. July 22 and 29, and
August 5, 12 and 19, 2002
Tuesdays, 6 p.m. July 23 and 30, and
August 6, 13 and 20, 2002
Course materials:
The materials for this course are electronic and are found on the CMGT 410
rEsourceSM page.
Instructor:
Greg Binder
Biography:
Your instructor comes to you with over 26 years of teaching experience.
He is a graduate of the US Military Academy at West Point and holds a
Masters Degree in Computer Science from the University of Arizona. He
taught Computer Science at the Academy for three years. Subsequently he
served on the staff of the US Army Management Systems Support Agency
at the Pentagon. Since 1980, he has worked for the City of Phoenix
Information Technology Department, consulted for the US Army Pentagon
and the State Department, and taught in the Business College and School
of Public Affairs at Arizona State University. He has been a faculty
member with the University of Phoenix since 1983, in all aspects of
graduate and undergraduate information systems subjects. He is involved
with both classroom delivery and Directed Study programs. At the City of
Phoenix Mr. Binder manages development of the e-commerce program,
privacy, and major reorganization of the City’s web site as major
assignments.
Telephone/Mail
Home:
15437 N 2nd Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85023
(602) 942-6448 (H)
Office:
(602) 256-3589 (W)
Electronic Mail Address:
gbinder@email.uophx.edu
gbinder69@uswest.net
gbinder@ci.phoenix.az.us
Web site address:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~gbinder69/
Availability:
Mr. Binder can be reached by any means above. In many cases, you will
have to leave a message, however, he will return your contact as soon as
possible. You may call the work number at any time. Home calls should
be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. For sending documents by e-mail using the
Internet, use the following address: gbinder@email.uophx.edu
Assignments:
It is my intention to follow, fairly carefully, the guidelines expressed in the
module as to assignments and administration. Please do not be misled:
you are responsible for the material in the assignments. The following
specific guidelines are provided:
The Learning Team will be used as a major vehicle in the various class
activities, both during workshops and in outside assignments. Established
teams will be modified to accommodate changed in class enrollment.
As with many University courses, class participation is a valued attribute,
contributing to the final grade. Several other measures of student
performance are noted in the Grading Criteria.
Grading:
%
95-100
91-94+
87-90+
83-86+
80-82+
78-79+
Please remember:
A=
B=
C=
D=
F=
Grade
A
AB+
B
BC+
%
75-77+
72-74+
68-71+
65-67+
<65
Grade
C
CD+
D
F
Excellent performance.
Above average performance
Average performance. Accomplishes only the minimum requirements.
Oral and written communication is at an acceptable level for an undergraduate student.
Meets minimally acceptable levels of performance.
Does not meet the most minimal requirements of the course.
All written work (does not include homework questions) will be according to
APA or MLA guidelines. Your grade will be based on style, content and format
including such items as clarity of communication, sentence and paragraph
construction, punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Late work will be docked 10%.
If you are unable to complete the coursework you should seek guidance from your
academic counselor – as a matter of University policy, incompletes are not
granted.
Course Standards:
The University of Phoenix Adult Teaching Learning Model is based on the
assumption that in preparation for every course, students will satisfy all
prerequisites. During the course itself, students will achieve certain learning
outcomes. All performance assessment depends upon the accomplishment of
these outcomes. Students are graded on achievement, rather than effort. It is the
responsibility of the student to come to class prepared for each workshop.
The University trusts that each student will maintain high standards of honesty
and ethical behavior. All assignments submitted in fulfillment of course
requirements must be the student's own work. All assignments except those
designated as "team" are meant to represent the effort of each individual student.
Team projects and assignments should represent equal efforts by all team
members.
While the University's Teaching/Learning Model emphasizes the sharing of
professional experiences in the context of analyzing relevant course materials, it is
against the policy of the University of Phoenix for students or faculty members to
share information in class about present or past employers that would be
considered proprietary, confidential, company sensitive, or trade secret. It is
assumed that students will perform professionally in preparing work required for
this class.
Attendance:
Attendance at all class sessions is mandatory.
Absences:
If an absence is necessary, the student must contact the faculty member. Second
absences are not allowed.
Please note: An absence may affect the student's grade.
Other:
During the following workshops, graded activities will be conducted (with point
value indicated):
DUE IN
W/S
2
3
4
5
5
WHO
Individual
Individual
Individual
Team
Individual
WHAT
Generic Project Plan
Expanded Generic Project Plan
Training Project Plan
Final Paper
Final Paper Presentation
FORM
Written
Written
Written
Written
Oral
POINTS
100
100
100
100
50
All
All
Individual
Individual
Class Participation
Learning Team Participation
50
40
TOTAL
540
Grading for Written Work
50% Content/Development







All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive
Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis and are
organized clearly
Where appropriate, the paper supports major points with theory relevant to development of the ideas,
and uses the vocabulary of the theory correctly
There is integration of theory and practice whereby the writer is able to link theories to practical
experience
Research is adequate and timely for the topic
The context and purpose of the writing is clear
20% Organization







The structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow
The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose and is directed
Paragraph transitions are present and logical, and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper
The conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper
The conclusion reviews the major points toward the appropriate audience
Ideas flow in a logical sequence
The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
10% Format






The paper, including citations and the reference page, follows designated guidelines for format
The paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., sections, summaries, tables of
contents, indices, appendices, etc.) when appropriate
The paper utilizes references appropriately
Headings, the use of italics, etc., aid the readability of the paper and are not overdone
The paper is neat, with attention given to format requirements
Original work
10% Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling


Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed
Spelling is correct
10% Readability/Style




Sentences are complete, clear and concise
Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought
Words used are precise and unambiguous

The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment
Grading for Oral Presentations
20% Organization and Structure



Presentation is well-organized, clear, and effectively structured
If this is a team presentation, it is integrated rather than a disjointed series of individual presentations
Topic is researched adequately
10% Effective Use of Visual Aids


Visual aids are clear and effective
Visual aids contribute to a focused and integrated presentation
50% Content of Presentation




Content of presentation clearly follows the written paper on which it is based (if applicable)
The topic is relevant and addresses the specifications of the assignment
The content presented is comprehensive, accurate and believable
Key points are noted and presented logically
10% Style, Presentation, and Appearance






Dress and grooming are professional and appropriate for the setting
Non-verbal gestures are appropriate to the purpose of the presentation and flow of ideas
Confidence and knowledge of content are evident
Audience is engaged, when appropriate, in a professional manner
Delivery time is used well-presentation is not rushed
Speaker adheres to the time limit
10% Questions and Comments


Audience feedback is solicited
Audience questions are effectively addressed and correctly answered
Download