Some useful math/calculus sites:
http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/a08/Graph.html
good Java graphing site
http://www.mathlesstraveled.com/?cat=24 scroll down to article "The Most Beautiful
Equation in the World"
http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/ tutorials, interactive modules (Univ of
Tennessee)
http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp (online integrator via Wolfram's Mathematica)
http://www.math.odu.edu/cbii/calcanim/#quad (calculus animations with Mathcad via
Windows Media Player)
http://people.hofstra.edu/Stefan_Waner/tutorials5/unit5_5.html
rate problems)
(Hofstra, a few example
http://www.martindalecenter.com/Calculators2_7_Calc.html
ONLINE textbooks/courses (as of April 2009)
http://calculus7.com/id24.html
(animation of Riemann sums)
http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/strangtext.htm
http://www.ugrad.math.ubc.ca/coursedoc/math100/
http://synechism.org/drupal/de2de/
(MIT open courseware)
(University of British Columbia)
(many java applets)
http://math.hws.edu/javamath/config_applets/index.html (13 Java applets incl Riemann
sums, epsilon delta,derivatives, and function composition )
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9156339/Calculus-Tutorial-3-DifferentialEquations#document_metadata
(download for real-life examples of diffy q's)
http://www.ugrad.math.ubc.ca/coursedoc/math100/labs/lab5/lab5.html
Newton's and Euler's methods)
http://math.arizona.edu/~calc/m124Worksheets.html
worksheets)
(demos of
(University of Arizona
http://d.scribd.com/docs/2ddw80euxysa9q7vf9kh.pdf (Calculus Tutorial 1, 3)
Specific References (mine or from problem set)
1. Problem Solving for Engineers and Scientists ISBN 0442004788 pp.62-68 (problem 1)
2. online tutorial #1 (d.scribd.com)
3. online tutorial #3 (d.scribd.com)
4 . Theory and Problems of Feedback Control Systems ISBN 0070170479
5 . personal notes from 1987
Modern Control Systems Dorf ISBN 0131457330
Optimal Control Lewis ISBN 0471033782
Digital Control of Dynamic Systems Franklin&Powell ISBN 0201820544
Techniques of Model-Based Control Brosilow&Joseph ISBN 013028078X
Adaptive Filtering, Prediction and Control Goodwin&Sin ISBN 013004069X
Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification Ljung&Soderstrom ISBN 0262620588
Advanced Excel for Scientific Data Analysis de Levie ISBN 0195152751
Some available software:
Pari/GP pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr - general purpose math computations, well-respected
Mathematica www.wolfram.com
MATLAB (control sys toolbox) www.mathworks.com
Octave (control sys toolbox) www.gnu.org/software/octave/ -open altern. To MATLAB
Gnumeric www.gnome.org/gnumeric -open source alternative to Excel
SAGE www.sagemath.org - general purpose math computations
Ubuntu Linux www.ubuntu.com (well-supported, Debian-based, easy install,
recommend Xubuntu, which comes with Gnumeric)
NetBeans www.netbeans.org - Java application with some preconfigured applet
windows&forms (Sun Micro)
PID Control Simulation/slide sites
http://www.mstarlabs.com/docs/tn031.html (good basic diagrams)
http://www.chem.mtu.edu/~tbco/cm416/pidchoice.html (Java simulation applet)
http://www.freevbcode.com/ShowCode.asp?ID=3808 (VB simulation download)
http://www.tu-harburg.de/mec/web212/electromechanic/recitation/PIDTutorial.pdf
(Univ of Hamburg)
https://www.ece.ubc.ca/~leos/pdf/e360/notes/PID.pdf (slideshow from Univ British
Columbia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_control_theory
*THREE ELEMENT BOILER DRUM LEVEL (FEEDWATER) CONTROL*
http://www.controlguru.com/wp/p44.html
(3-element control)
http://www.controlglobal.com/articles/2007/123.html (3-element control)
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/22139/3-element-boiler-drum-level-control (3-element
control)
from the last reference (paraphrased slightly)
1.0 *Introduction: *
In the boiler the steam flow changes according to the load demand from the turbine or
from the process consuming the steam energy. To match the steam take off from the
boiler, the feedwater flow has to be increased or decreased as required. The feedwater is
automatically controlled by suitably positioning Feedwater Control Valve (FCV)
provided in the feedwater line at boiler inlet.
2.0 *Three Element Feedwater Control: *
For automatic control of the feedwater flow to the boiler, three (elements) primary inputs
are normally being considered.
2.1 Drum level.
2.2 Main Steam flow.
2.3 Feedwater flow.
In addition, measurements of Drum Pressure, Main Steam Pressure and Main
Steam temperature are also taken for correction/compensation purposes.
*Following paragraphs briefly explains how the feedwater flow is regulated to match the
steam demand from the boiler*
3.0 *Drum level measurement (in an averaging config)
Two numbers of level transmitters (dP transmitters) one on left hand side and the right
hand side of the Boiler Steam Drum are provided to measure drum level.
3.1 The two level signals from these transmitters are averaged and connected
to a manual three-way selector switch. The other two inputs for the
three-way selector switch are directly from the two transmitters. Normally
the average signal is selected for the control. In case any problem with any
one of the transmitters; the healthy transmitter is selected in the
three-way selector switch for the control.
3.2 The functioning of two level transmitters is continuously monitored
through a deviation monitor. In case of difference between the two level
transmitters higher than the preset value, the control could be
automatically transferred to Manual with an annunciation.
3.3 The selected drum level signal may be compensated for density variation in
the drum water due to pressure changes (actually due to temperature changes)
in the drum, through a function generating with drum pressure signal.
4.0 *Drum Level Control: *
The compensated drum level signal fed to a reverse acting P I controller as
process variable. This measured drum level is compared with setpoint and a
correcting signal (with proportional plus integral action) is generated in
the controller according the deviation between the measured process variable
(drum level) and the setpoint.
5.0 *Main steam flow measurement: *
The dP Transmitter measures the dP across the venturi nozzle, provided in
the main steam line (The dP measured is proportional to the square of the
flow through the venturi nozzle). The measured dP is square rooted and compensated
density variations due to change of Pressure and Temperature.
6.0 *Feedwater flow measurement: *
The dP Transmitter measures the dP across the orifice fitting provided in
the Feedwater line. The measured dP is square rooted to arrive at the feed
water flow.
7.0 *Feedwater flow control:*
The compensated steam flow is added with the corrected signal generated in
the drum level controller. This sum is taken as the demand of feedwater
flow (cascade setpoint) for the boiler and compared with the actual feed
water flow to the boiler. The deviation between the demand and the actual
feedwater flow is fed to the P & I controller. The processed output from the
controller is given to the final control element (feedwater valve).
8.0 *Single Element Control: *
During low load operation, three-element control is not required. Drum level
measurement with its setpoint is adequate. Hence the output of the Drum
Level Controller is directly given to the Feedwater Control Valve through
the selector switch provided after Cascade P & I Controller.
9.0 *Auto Manual Operation: *
An Auto Manual feature is provided as the last element of control
system. Auto or Manual operation can be selected from the Auto Manual
Selector Switch locally or in the graphic. If auto selected, the positioning
signal from the selected controller (through Hand selector switch) will go
to the Final control Element – Feedwater Control Valve. If manual is
selected, the controller's outputs are isolated and the Feedwater Control
valve can be positioned by the Operator.
Raise/Lower push buttons are provided so that the
Feedwater Control valve can be opened or closed as desired by the operator.
Bumpless transfer must be designed in
to avoid sudden jump of control valve position during change over from auto
to manual or vice versa.
10.0 *Indications: *
Normally Setpoint value indication, Deviation indication, Final Control
element (Feedwater Control valve) position indication and Process value
indication are usually provided.
11.0 Alarm and Trip signals: Low and high level alarm signals can be generated
from the transmitter output through software switches. With multiple transmitters, l
ow and very high level trip signals (software switches) from both the
transmitters output and also from the averaged/compensated signals would be handled
through an 'OR' gate.
Typical Trip/Alarm Signals generated.
11.1 Transmitter deviation Alarm.
11.2 Drum level – Low Level Alarm
11.3 Drum level – High Level Alarm
11.4 Drum level – Very Low Level Trip
11.5 Drum level – Very High Level Trip
12 Some Trip/Alarm Signals me be hardwired
12.1 Drum level – Very Low Level Trip
12.2 Drum level – Very High Level Trip
**END**
Problem Set
[ref 1] You have a toxic chemical in a tank which is overpressurizing (someone forgot a
pressure relief valve!). Unfortunately the drain valve is also corroded and useless. You
can drill a new drain hole of any size in the underside the elevated tank but there is a
tradeoff in drilling time vs drain time. Due to toxicity, the draining will be unmonitored
into a trough after the (single) hole is drilled. Presume drainage time is inversely
proportional to the hole cross-sectional area and that drill time is proportional to this area.
You only have a minute or two to decide what size hole to drill (no detailed derivation).
What size do you drill?
[for solution see ref]
[ref 2] A sewage plant discharges it effluent at a known point in a river. Oxygen
concentration is critical to fish in the river. At what point will the concentration fall
below 4 given the following model: conc=A-B[exp(Cx)-exp(Dx)] where
(A,B,C,D)=(10,15,-0.1,0.5) and x is the distance in miles downstream from discharge.
Hint: use the Newton-Raphson method, try initial guesses in the range 5-15.
[for solution see ref]
[ref 2] CCCSD has a workload of files to process by computer and can choose either
mainframe or PC. Solve for w= file workload for the breakeven point. The cost
equations are c1= 1.2*w and c2 (mainframe) =100+log(w+1). Initial guess w=50.
[for solution see ref]
[ref 3] There is an infection on the DVC campus. One student was infected with a deadly
virus, V. The spread of the virus among the students was given by the sigmoidal curve:
Y=5000/ [1+4999exp(-0.8t)]
where y is the number of infected students at time t.
Find the number of students infected after 5 days.
Find when 40% of the students would be infected.
Find the time when dy/dt is a maximum.
Plot the graph of y versus t.
[for solution see ref]
[ref 4] Find the transfer function of a system given the describing differential equation
y’’+ 3 y’ + 2’ = u + u’
with(u,y) = input, output
(use Laplace transform)
[for solution see ref]
[ref 4] Here is a diagram of a tank filling system. Draw the basic block diagram.
[for solution see ref]
An alternate control to PID has been proposed. Show how it could be simulated in Excel
OR decide if it can control as well as PID. The mechanism details are:
Form:
subscripts r,d denote ratio,difference
SP,PV= setpoint, process value ewa=exponential weighted average
Use a datum scaling of 0-1 (field IO to PLCs normally 0-4095 ie 12 bits)
Must accommodate a raise/lower (R/L) type output
Allow for input ewa filtering (80%old, 20%new weights)
Use hi/lo output clamps of 10 and 80%. Allow a MAC (max
allowable change) of 0.10 (10%) in any output sent
Initially use SP=0.50. Bump (step change) to 0.70
The genl form is Zr = Kt*[ Kq*Xr + Az*Kz*Zd^(Nz) ]
(1)
Zr = Zact/Zsp Zd=Zact-Zsp Xr = Xprev/X Az=+/-1 Nz=Integer >0
Ki = coefficients (Kt is dynamic)
For example, with everything on SP, steady-state, Zr=1, Zd=0 and reduces to:
1 = Kt*Kq* Xr so that Kt=1/Kq for example
Compare the response of the proposed ctrl with PID …use at least 20 time steps
[for solution see Bill McEachen]
You have a dataset from a control test for a 2nd order system. Derive the coefficients for
the basic ARMAX model. (Identification/Estimation) from the data.
A y(t) = B u(t) + C e(t) where y,u,e = output,input,disturbance/noise
The actual model is A=[1.5 –0.7] B= [1.0 0.5 ] C= [ -1.0 0.20] Use a S/N ratio of 10,
forgetting factors 0.99, 0.95, filter contraction factor=0. Run #iterations=100 with input
merely a PRBS (pseudo-random binary signal, just 0’s and 1’s).
Use K=10 for the identity matrix multiplier P0=K*I
The difference equation is 1.5 Y(k) -0.7 Y(k-1)= Uk + 0.5 U(k-1) –1.0 Ek +0.2 E(k-1)
at time step k
My simulation returned [ -1.493,0.692, 0.990,0.507,-0.855,-0.025 ] against actual
[ 1.50 -0.70 1.0 0.50 -1.0 0.20 ]
[for C++ coding solution see Bill McEachen]