Defamation Crossword
Across
3. CODIFIED IN S4(3)
5. THESE BENEFIT FROM A NEW DEFENCE UNDER THE 2013 ACT
6. SUPREME COURT CASE WHICH RENAMED FAIR COMMENT
9. PEOPLE WHO HAVE A DEFENCE UNDER S10 OF THE NEW ACT
13. ARGUMENT MADE BY REFORMERS FOR WHY REFORM TO DEFAMATION LAW
WAS NECESSARY
15. S.1 WORDS ARE NOT DEFAMATORY UNLESS THEY CARRY A RISK OF THIS
16. S1 OF THIS ACT WAS ABOLISHED BY THE 2013 ACT
17. MORE DIFFICULT FOR THESE TO SUE UNDER 2013 ACT
18. 2013 ACT ATTEMPTS, PERHAPS WRONGLY, TO PREVENT THIS
Down
1. AUTHOR OF THE DEFAMATION BILL 2010
2. INTRODUCED DEFAMATION BILL 2012
4. PUBLISHING REFEREED WORK IN EITHER OF THESE GIVES A DEFENCE UNDER
THE NEW ACT
7. CASE WHICH INTRODUCED THE SUBSTANTIAL TORT TEST
8. DEFENCE UNAFFECTED BY THE 2013 ACT
9. PUBLICATION RULE INTRODUCED BY NEW ACT
10. DEFENCE FORMERLY KNOWN AS REYNOLDS
11. DEFENCE REPLACED BY TRUTH
12. 2013 ACT ATTEMPTS TO LIMIT THIS BUT IT IS ALREADY RARE
14. DEFENCE WHICH USED TO BE CALLED FAIR COMMENT