Copyright (c) 2003 The New York Times. All rights reserved. Decemb

12/11/03 NYT A38
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
Page 1
12/11/03 N.Y. Times A38
2003 WLNR 5637274
New York Times (NY)
Copyright (c) 2003 The New York Times. All rights reserved.
December 11, 2003
Section: A
Mental Health Experts Call Sniper Defendant Brainwashed
JAMES DAO
Lawyers for Lee Malvo push boundaries of insanity defense into gray area by presenting
mental health experts to testify that he was brainwashed by John A Muhammad, convicted
mastermind of Washington area killings; there are few precedents for defense based on
argument that brainwashing amounts to insanity, and obstacles to winning acquittal are
high; what may be gained is sympathy with jury that could spare Malvo's life (M)
CHESAPEAKE, Va., Dec. 10 The experts have likened him to a child soldier and cult member.
They said he was clinically depressed, even suicidal. They concluded he had lost touch
with his identity and could not differentiate right from wrong.
But was Lee Malvo, the younger defendant in the sniper attacks in the Washington area,
legally insane when he took part in the rampage?
A host of mental health experts for the defense have offered evidence that he was,
asserting that Mr. Malvo was effectively brainwashed by John A. Muhammad, the convicted
mastermind of the killings, into participating in the shootings.
By trying to equate brainwashing with mental illness, Mr. Malvo's lawyers have pushed the
boundaries of the insanity defense into a gray area where precedents are few and obstacles
to winning an acquittal are high, legal experts said.
"They are between a rock and hard place," said Christopher Slobogin, an expert in mental
health law at the Levin School of Law at the University of Florida in Gainesville. "It has
traditionally required a serious mental illness such as psychosis or serious personality
disorder to prove insanity. It doesn't appear he has either."
But even if the defense fails to gain an acquittal, it would score a victory if the jury
is moved to sympathize with the defendant, experts said. That sympathy might cause jurors
to recommend a life sentence instead of death if Mr. Malvo is found guilty and the trial
moves to a penalty phase.
"At a minimum, I'm sure the defense has moved the jury from a sense of outrage about the
© 2005 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
12/11/03 NYT A38
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
Page 2
random killings to asking, 'Who is Lee Malvo?' " said Scott Sundby, an expert on the death
penalty at the Washington and Lee Law School in Lexington.
Mr. Malvo is on trial in the killing of Linda Franklin, an F.B.I. analyst, in October 2002
outside a Home Depot store in Falls Church. Mr. Muhammad was convicted in a different
killing and sentenced to death last month by a jury in Virginia Beach.
Mr. Malvo's lawyers are expected to rest their case on Thursday.
Winning an insanity case requires convincing jurors that a defendant was unable to
distinguish right from wrong because of a severe mental disease or impairment. Juries have
historically been somewhat skeptical about the plea, experts said. But they have been
willing to accept when defendants were shown to suffer from serious problems like
hallucinations, amnesia, multiple personalities or unshakable delusions.
Mr. Malvo's lawyers have not shown that kind of disorder. They have argued that he was
mentally ill as a result of brainwashing by Mr. Muhammad.
Mental health experts for the defense have likened Mr. Malvo's relationship with the older
man to the ties a a cult member has to a charismatic leader or a child soldier to a
warlord. A result, they said, is that Mr. Malvo lost all sense of morality, all sense of
identity, and became little more than an extension of Mr. Muhammad ego.
Exploiting Mr. Malvo's hunger for a father figure, Mr. Muhammad trained Mr. Malvo to be a
soldier "in his war against America," Dr. Neil Blumberg, a forensic psychiatrist from
Maryland, testified on Wednesday.
Mr. Muhammad used an array of techniques to indoctrinate Mr. Malvo, Dr. Blumberg and other
experts testified, including isolating him, controlling his diet and sleep, forcing him to
watch violent videos, training him to use guns and teaching him a violent brand of Islam
and black separatism. The indoctrination desensitized Mr. Malvo to violence, broke down
his already shaky sense of self and made him unable to resist Mr. Muhammad's commands. In
psychiatric terms, the experts said, he suffered from dissociative disorder.
"He doesn't have multiple personalities," Dr. Blumberg testified. "But he's lost his sense
of identity as a result of the prolonged and coercive persuasion or indoctrination."
The prosecutors have raised several questions about the defense case. They have argued
that Mr. Malvo voluntarily chose to be with Mr. Muhammad, that the so-called
indoctrination lasted just a few weeks and could not have completely impaired his
faculties and that he was predisposed toward antisocial behavior.
The prosecution has also seized on the fact that Mr. Malvo has on several occasions
expressed revulsion or reservations about Mr. Muhammad's violent plans -- once even
attempting suicide to avoid killing people -- as evidence that he knew that those plans
were horribly wrong.
© 2005 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
12/11/03 NYT A38
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
Page 3
---- INDEX REFERENCES ---COMPANY: HOME DEPOT INC
NEWS SUBJECT:
INDUSTRY:
(Violent Crime (1VI27); Crime (1CR87); Social Issues (1SO05))
REGION:
(Healthcare (1HE06); Psychology (1PS96); Healthcare Services (1HE13))
Language:
(USA (1US73); Americas (1AM92); North America (1NO39))
EN
OTHER INDEXING: (Dao, James; Malvo, Lee; Muhammad, John Allen) (HOME DEPOT; ISLAM; LEE
LAW SCHOOL; LEE MALVO; LEVIN SCHOOL OF LAW; MENTAL; MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS CALL SNIPER
DEFENDANT; UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA) (Blumberg; Christopher Slobogin; Exploiting Mr.; John
A. Muhammad; Lee Malvo; Linda Franklin; Malvo; Muhammad; Neil Blumberg; Scott Sundby)
(Murders and Attempted Murders; Serial Murders; Mental Health and Disorders; Brainwashing;
Murders and Attempted Murders) (Washington (DC); Maryland; Virginia)
EDITION: Late Edition - Final
Word Count: 966
12/11/03 NYT A38
END OF DOCUMENT
© 2005 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.