Comments on the paper ”Crystal growth, spectral, optical, and

advertisement
On the existence of ‘thiourea urea magnesium chloride’ and
‘urea thiourea sodium chloride’
Bikshandarkoil R. Srinivasan
Department of Chemistry, Goa University, Goa 403206, India
Email: srini@unigoa.ac.in Telephone: 0091-(0)832-6519316; Fax: 0091-(0)832-2451184
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION
Experimental details of reinvestigation of crystal growth reported by Gopinath et al
All the chemicals used in this study were purchased from commercial sources and were used
as received without any further purification. Double distilled water was used as solvent.
Infrared (IR) spectra of the samples diluted in KBr were recorded in the region 4000 – 400
cm-1 using a Shimadzu (IR Prestige-21) FT-IR Spectrometer, at a resolution of 4 cm-1. UVVis spectra were recorded using an Agilent-8453 UV-Visible spectroscopy system. X-ray
powder pattern were recorded on a Rigaku Miniflex II powder diffractometer using Cu-Kα
radiation with a Ni-filter.
Reinvestigation of growth of a so called thiourea urea magnesium chloride (1)
A mixture of thiourea (1.520 g, 20 mmol), urea (1.200 g, 20 mmol) and MgCl2·6H2O (4.066
g, 20 mmol) were taken in double distilled water (~ 40 mL) and stirred well to obtain a clear
solution. The clear reaction mixture was left undisturbed for crystallization. Slow evaporation
of the solvent at ambient temperature (30 ºC) resulted in the separation of transparent crystals
after a week. The crystals thus obtained were isolated by filtration, washed with ice cold
water and dried in air yielded ~0.95 g and labeled as compound (1) and investigated by
qualitative chemical tests and spectral methods like IR, UV-Vis and powder pattern. An
additional crystal growth experiment was performed by employing the same amounts of urea
(1.200 g, 20 mmol) and MgCl2·6H2O (4.066 g, 20 mol) but an enhanced amount of thiourea
(3.04 g, 40 mmol). The yield of the product from this experiment was more than twice (2.31
g) than obtained earlier. The IR and UV-Vis spectra of this product as well as 1was found to
be identical to that of pure thiourea (Fig. S1).
Fig. S1 IR spectra of urea (top), thiourea (middle) and a so called thiourea urea magnesium chloride
(bottom) showing that TUMC is nothing but thiourea.
Reinvestigation of growth of a so called urea thiourea sodium chloride (2)
A mixture of thiourea (1.520 g, 20 mmol), urea (1.200 g, 20 mmol) and sodium chloride
(1.168 g, 20 mmol) were taken in double distilled water (~ 30 mL) and stirred well to obtain a
clear solution. The clear reaction mixture was left undisturbed for crystallization. Slow
evaporation of the solvent at ambient temperature (30 ºC) resulted in the separation of
transparent crystals after ~6 days. The product thus obtained was isolated by filtration,
washed with little ice cold water and dried in air yielded ~1.01 g and labeled as compound (2)
and investigated by chemical and spectral methods. Compound 2 was confirmed as pure
thiourea based on its spectra and powder pattern (Fig. S2)
Fig. S2 The identical X-ray powder pattern confirms that a so called urea thiourea sodium chloride
(bottom) is nothing but pure thiourea (top).
Note: All the reactions were performed in millimolar scale (maximum of 20 mmol) and a
ratio of 1:1:1 of thiourea:urea:metal salt was employed. No special efforts were taken to grow
big blocks of crystals, since the aim of the work was to understand the exact nature of the
product formed. It is observed that the yield of the crystalline product in all experiments was
always less than the amount of thiourea employed for crystal growth. The use of an enhanced
quantity of thiourea resulted in an increase in product yield but still the yield was less than
the amount of thiourea employed for crystal growth. A crystal growth reaction was performed
by using only thiourrea and metal chloride in 1:1 ratio without using any urea. It is interesting
to note that in all cases (use of excess thiourea or use of no urea) the final product obtained is
same namely thiourea since all products exhibited the same IR spectrum. The experiments
have been performed repeatedly and the results are highly reproducible. The chemical tests
confirmed the absence of any chloride or the s-block metal.
References (weblinks are shown for all citations for ready identification)
[1] Gopinath S, Barathan S, Rajasekaran R. Growth and studies of thiourea urea magnesium chloride
(TUMC) single crystals, J Therm Anal Calorim 2012, 109:841–5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1775-3
[2] Gopinath S, Barathan S, Rajasekaran R. Growth and characterization of semiorganic crystal,
J Therm Anal Calorim 2012, 110:789–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1982-y
[3] Fleck M, Petrosyan AM. Difficulties in the growth and characterization of non-linear optical
materials: A case study of salts of amino acids, J Cryst Growth. (2010) 312:2284-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.04.054
[4] Srinivasan BR, Moovendaran K, Natarajan S. Comments on ‘‘Crystal growth, spectral, optical,
and thermal characterization of glycyl-L-alanine hydrochloride (GLAH) single crystal’’ J Therm
Anal Calorim http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4164-x
[5] Baran J, Petrosyan AM. Comments on the Paper by R. Ezhil Vizhi et al. “Synthesis, Crystal
Growth, Structural, Dielectric and Ferroelectric Properties of N-Acetyl Glycine Phosphite (AGPI)
Single Crystals, Ferroelectrics. (2012) 432:117-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2012.707879
[6] Srinivasan BR. On the existence of L-alanine cadmium bromide. Spectrochim Acta. (2013)
116A:639-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.07.052
[7] Petrosyan AM, Ghazaryan VV, Fleck M. On the existence of “bis-glycine maleate”
J Cryst Growth (2012) 359:129-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.024
[8] Srinivasan BR. Does an ‘L-arginine doped orthophosphoric acid’ crystal exist? J Lumin. (2014)
148: 370-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.12.035
[9] Srinivasan BR. On the existence of ‘glycine barium nitrate potassium nitrate’ crystal, Optik. 2014
(125):3606-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.075
[10] Petrosyan AM, Ghazaryan VV, Fleck M. On the existence of “L-threonine formate”, “L-alanine
lithium chloride” and “bis L-alanine lithium chloride” crystals, Spectrochim Acta (2013)
105A:623-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.01.009
[11] Bock CW, Kaufman A, Glusker JP. Coordination of water to magnesium cations, Inorg Chem
1994, 33:419-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic00081a007
[12] Boeyens JCA, Herbstein FH. Ionic Complexes of Thiourea. II. Chemical and Crystallographic
Survey and Determination of the Crystal Structures of Some Representative Complexes, Inorg
Chem (1967) 6:1408-25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic50053a027
[13] Pedrares AS, Teng W, Ruhlandt-Senge K. Syntheses and Structures of Magnesium Pyridine
Thiolates–Model Compounds for Magnesium Binding in Photosystem I, Chem Eur J 2003,
9:2019-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200204294
[14] Srinivasan BR, Keerthika N. Reinvestigation of crystal growth of thiosemicarbazide potassium
chloride and thiosemicarbazide lithium chloride, Optik 2014, 125:4807-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.04.054
[15] Furniss B S, Hannaford A J, Rogers V, Smith PWG, Tatchell AR. Vogel’s Textbook of Practical
organic Chemistry, 4th ed, London: ELBS / Longman, 1978. p 933-7.
[16] Svehla G, Vogel’s Qualitative Inorganic Analysis, 7th ed. New Delhi: Pearson, 2011. p164-7.
[17] Srinivasan BR, Jyai RN. Reinvestigation of growth of ‘L-valine zinc sulfate crystal’
Spectrochimica Acta, 2014, 120A:621-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.11.062
[18] Srinivasan BR, Naik TA, Tylczyński Z, Priolkar KR. Reinvestigation of growth of thiourea urea
zinc sulfate crystal, Spectrochimica Acta 2014, 117A:805-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.08.083
[19] Natarajan S, Srinivasan BR, Moovendaran K. Reinvestigation of crystal growth of ‘L-proline
succinate’ & ‘L-threonine zinc acetate’ showing use of IR spectra for product identification,
J Crystallization Process & Technology 2014, 4:121-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jcpt.2014.42015
Download