HUM 211 Online van Gogh Comparison Paper Rubric
Traits
Yes!!
9-10
Yes, but…
80 pts (grading scale below)
8
No, but…. 7
No!
6 or fewer
Draws insightful and thoughtful
conclusions from the similarities and
differences, usually highlighting either
one or the other. Accurately selects all
major similarities and differences for
each item. Selects important features or
attributes of the items that can provide
insight into the nature of those items
being compared.
Selects characteristics that
can provide for a
meaningful comparison.
Selects similarities and
differences for each item.
Draws some thoughtful
conclusions from the
comparison.
Selects characteristics that provide
for a partial comparison of the
items.
Makes some errors in identifying
major similarities and differences
Isn’t clear about the significance of
the comparison.
Selects characteristics that are not important
and don’t lead to insightful conclusions.
Makes many errors in identifying major
similarities and differences. Does not get far
beyond noting similarities and differences.
The piece is logical and progresses from
point to point seamlessly. Includes intro
with hook, body, and conclusion.
Examines points in the order presented
in intro, uses transitions effectively and
guides the reader through the piece.
The reader is able to follow
the writer's line of
reasoning with little effort.
More transitions would help
the reader.
Gaps in reasoning are evident. The
reader sometimes feels lost. Few
transitions or other reader aids are
present.
The writer has apparently followed no plan.
The reader struggles to figure out what is
happening.
Words convey the intended message in
an interesting, precise, and natural way.
The writing is full and rich, yet concise.
The language is sometimes
inspired, but sometimes
more prosaic. The reader
enjoys the highs and is
disappointed by the lack of
consistent vocabulary
choices
The language is quite ordinary, but
it does convey the message; it's
functional, even if it lacks punch.
Often the writer settles for what's
easy or handy, producing a sort of
"generic paper," stuffed with
familiar words and phrases.
The writer struggles with a limited
vocabulary, groping for words to convey
meaning. Often the language is so vague and
abstract or so redundant and devoid of detail
that only the broadest, most general sort of
message comes through.
Sentence
Fluency
The writing has an easy flow and
rhythm when read aloud.
Much of the writing flows
well with occasional lapses.
Sentences tend to be mechanical,
choppy, and rambling.
The paper is difficult to follow or to read
aloud. Sentences are awkward.
Mechanics
No mistakes in grammar, punctuation,
citations and works cited page.
Some errors but they do
not interfere with the
readability of the text.
Number and type of errors make
the text difficult to read and
understand.
Numerous errors in usage, structure,
spelling, or punctuation. Meaning is lost.
Chooses,
identifies,
and uses
appropriate
characteristics
for comparison
Organization
Word Choice
Interpretation/ Interpretation/evaluation
Evaluation
supported
throughout paper
Interp./eval. partially
supported
Final interp./eval. not
connected to paper or
not supported
No interpretation and/or no
evaluation
Internal
Citation
No mistakes
Correct format with a
few small errors
Some mistakes that effect
the format
Missing /many mistakes
Works Cited
No mistakes
Correct format with a
few small errors
Some mistakes that effect
the format
Missing /many mistakes
Grading Scale
A- 72-80
B- 64-71
C- 56-63
D- 48-55
F- 47 or below