Electronic supplementary materials for: Optical transmission of nematic liquid crystal 5CB doped by single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes L.N. Lisetski1, A.P. Fedoryako1, A.N. Samoilov1, S.S. Minenko1, M.S. Soskin2, and N.I. Lebovka3 1 Institute for Scintillation Materials, NAS of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine 2 Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine 3 Institute of Biocolloidal Chemistry named after F.D. Ovcharenko, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, Email: lebovka@gmail.com Contents 1. Optical transmission spectra 2. Static bending persistence length of nanotubes 3. Dielectric studies 3.1. Measurements of dielectric permittivity 3.2. Experimental data and their discussion References S1. Optical transmission spectra Figure S1 present examples of UV-vis absorption spectra (200-800 nm) of a 20 μm thin film of pure 5CB and 0.02 % single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) dispersed in 5CB in the isotropic (T=310 K) and nematic (T=301 K) phases. The similar spectra were registered also for the multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The presented data were obtained using sandwich-type LC cells with 20 m thickness. Before insertion of a sample into the cell, the cell walls were treated by polyvinyl alcohol aqueous solution and dried and rubbed in one direction, similarly to the standard procedure of obtaining nematic with the planar texture. The sample was introduced between the cell walls by capillary action at the temperature of 313 K, i.e., in the isotropic phase just above the phase transition from the nematic state. Note that UV-vis absorption spectra of pure 5CB were frequently discussed in the literature (see, e.g., [1–3]. The cut off region of the 5CB is located below 350 nm. It is generally known that in conventional nematics the transmission to the nematic phase is always substantially lower than to the isotropic phase. UV–vis absorption spectra of carbon nanotubes in different solvents were also intensively studied (see, e.g. [4]). Very broad adsorption bands were observed in the region below 350 nm that can associated with plasmon absorbance. The absolute wavelength of the -plasmon absorbance has been shown to vary with nanotube diameter d (nm) as [4] p (nm)=1239.84187/(4.80 + 0.70/d2) (S 1) This empirical relationship gives 255 nm for the energy range in a single sheet of graphene and 243 nm for nanotubes with diameter of 15 nm that were used in the present work. Fig. S1. UV-vis absorption spectra (i.e., optical transmission Tr versus wavelength , 200800 nm) of a 20 μm thin film of pure 5CB and 0.02 % single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) dispersed in 5CB in isotropic (T=310 K) and nematic (T=301 K) phases. In order to exclude possible impact of the adsorption bands of 5CB matrix and nanotubes, the optical transmission Tr was analyzed at 700 nm wave-length that was far away from the mentioned cut off regions. The introduction of CNTs into the 5CB matrix resulted in a noticeable decrease of the optical transmissions. Such behaviour was typical for LC matrixes doped by nanotubes [5,6]. If the measured transmission of the 5CB + CNT system is Tr, and the 5CB solvent transmission is Tr(5CB), then the difference Tr(5CB)- Tr can serve as a measure of the contribution of nanotubes to the total value of transmission (i.e., absorption + reflectance/scattering) of the 5CB + CNT system. In our experiments, well-defined stepwise changes in Tr(5CB) - Tr at the nematic-isotropic transition were clearly observed for 5CB+NT dispersions (Fig. S2). The value of (Tr(5CB) - Tr) can reflect the perturbation of LC medium trapped by individual CNT coils or their aggregates. Figure S2 presents Tr(5CB) - Tr differences for the temperatures in the isotropic phase (T=310 K) and in the nematic phase (T=301 K). Note that Tr(5CB) - Tr values were much smaller in the isotropic phase than in the nematic phase. This 1 difference may be a clear indication of strong perturbations of 5CB medium in the vicinity of carbon nanotube aggregates. The presence of such perturbations was demonstrated by recent electrooptical investigations of interfacial 5CB layers bounded by CNTs [7–10]. The 5CB molecules can be anchored strongly to the side walls of CNTs and retain their position upon application of the electric field. In the rigid random-coil limit (i.e., when l<lp): dc l . (S4) Analyses of SEM images of CNTs with different diameters d revealed the presence of strong lp(d) dependence (Fig. S3) [12] that can be approximated by the following quadratic relation: lp d 2 / a . (S5) where a = 1.54 0.02 nm and lp, d are represented in nm. Fig. S2. The difference in optical transmissions Tr(5CB)-Tr of pure 5CB and 5CB+0.02 % SWCNTs versus wavelength , 200-800 nm at temperatures corresponding to the isotropic (T=310 K) and nematic (T=301 K) phases. E.g., it was shown that the mean thickness of interfacial layers in 5CB+ 0.0025 % MWCNT composite increases from 1 μm up to ~4.5 μm when nematic structure of 5CB undergoes the Freedericksz transition from planar to homeotropic orientation under the applied transverse electric field ~3.5 V [9]. The investigations have also shown the presence of quite different responses to the applied field in the inner “lakes” and at the outer borders of MWCNT aggregates. S2. Static bending persistence length of nanotubes In many cases, the shape of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) deviates significantly from rodlike geometry and is rather tortuous when grown randomly by chemical vapor deposition method [11]. Dependence of the effective size dc upon the length l of CNT for random coil-like CNTS can be approximated as [12] d c 2l p l 2l p2 (exp( l / l p ) 1) (S2) where lp is the static bending persistence length (i.e., the maximum straight length that is not bent by a permanent structural deformation). In the rigid random-coil limit (i.e., when l>>lp): d c 2l p l . (S3) Fig. S3. Static bending persistence length lp versus diameter of CNT d experimentally determined for analyses of SEM images (squares). Solid line corresponds to the quadratic approximation, Eq. (S4). S3. Dielectric studies 3.1. Measurements of dielectric permittivity A sandwich-type cell was used in dielectric measurements. It consisted of a capacitor with the metal plates. Only the perpendicular components of dielectric permittivity (real, , ' and imaginary, ) were determined. At the frequencies below 30 MHz, the oscilloscopic method was used, and the measurements were carried out using an E7-11 type Q-meter (KALIBR,Belarus) at the frequencies above 30 MHz. The cell thickness (h=50 m) was set by a Teflon spacer. Before the measurements, the cell parts were washed in hexane and dried at 390 K. The electrodes were covered by a thin polyvinyl alcohol film rubbed in one direction for ensuring the planar texture [13]. This procedure was similar to that used for preparation of the optical cells. The LC system in the isotropic state was introduced into the pre-heated cell by the capillary forces at the temperature 5–10 K above the nematic–isotropic transition point. The values of cell capacitance Cc and dielectric loss tan were estimated from the phase difference between the " 2 voltage and current. Then, the C s / Co ' and values of tan " ' were calculated, where Cs Cc / 1 tan (S6) is the capacitance of the sample, C0 is the capacitance of the empty cell. 3.2. Experimental data and their discussion Many examples of applications of the dielectric spectroscopy for study of nematics doped by CNTs were previously presented [14– 18]. However, the results reported up to date for an LC doped by CNTs are rather contradictory: introduction of CNTs can cause either an increase or a decrease of dielectric permittivity; moreover, different behaviour of such systems at low and high frequencies was also noted [14]. Figure S4 presents frequency dependences of the perpendicular components of dielectric permittivity (real, , (a) and imaginary, ,(b)) for pure nematic 5CB and 5CB doped by 0.01% SWCNTs and 0.01% MWCNTs. ' " Note that previously reported data [14] evidence that introduction of CNTs can also result in a decrease of dielectric permittivity in the low frequency range. This effect was explained by the fact that CNTs can serve as traps for charge carriers, thus lowering the concentration of ions in the LC matrix. The apparent discrepancy between our data and data of [14] can be easily explained by difference in the degree of CNT purity. The effect of “traps” can be only important for CNT samples of high purity. When purity of a CNT sample is not very high, doping of LC by CNTs can result in increased concentration of charge carriers, thus causing the opposite effect upon dielectric permittivity. The relaxation effects were also clearly observed in ( f ) plots at higher frequencies above 1-10 Hz. Characteristic relaxation frequencies were of 8 MHz, 15 kHz and 3 kHz for pure 5CB, 5CB+SWCNT, 5CB+MWCNT samples, respectively (Fig. S4b). The observed characteristic frequency of pure 5CB was in full correspondence with the previously reported data [19]. And smaller relaxation frequencies of 5CB+SWCNT and 5CB+MWCNT samples, possibly, reflect the effect of CNTs on restriction of director dynamics inside nematic LC. " References [1] Wu S-T 1991 A semiempirical model for liquid-crystal refractive index dispersions J. Appl. Phys. 69 2080–7 Fig. S4. Frequency dependences of the perpendicular components of dielectric permittivity: real, , (a) and imaginary, ,(b). Data are presented for pure nematic 5CB, and 5CB doped by 0.01% SWCNTs and 0.01% MWCNTs, T=301 K. ' " The observed dispersion at low frequencies (f<103 Hz) can be ascribed to ions moving in the vicinity of the surfaces of cell electrodes (for pure nematic 5CB) or surfaces of CNTs (for 5CB doped by CNTs). Large differences in the obtained values of and for the pristine 5CB and 5CB doped by CNTs were also observed in the low-frequency part of the dielectric spectrum. These differences were more pronounced for SWCNTs than for MWCNTs, which can be easily explained by large difference in the specific surface areas of these CNTs. It is in full agreement with the observed differences in optical density D for SWCNTs and MWCNTs. It was substantially higher for SWCNTs than for MWCNTs due to the same reason, i.e., larger specific surface area of SWCNTs. ' " [2] Bras A R E, Henriques S, Casimiro T, AguiarRicardo A, Sotomayor J, Caldeira J, Santos C and Dionísio M 2007 Characterization of a Nematic Mixture by Reversed-Phase HPLC and UV Spectroscopy: Application to Phase Behavior Studies in Liquid Crystal-CO2 Systems Liq. Cryst. 34 (5) 591–7 [3] Qi H, O’Neil J and Hegmann T 2008 Chirality transfer in nematic liquid crystals doped with (S)Naproxen functionalized gold nanoclusters: An induced circular dichroism study J. Mater. Chem. 18 374–80 [4] Rance G A, Marsh D H, Nicholas R J and Khlobystov A N 2010 UV-vis absorption spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes: Relationship between the p-electron plasmon and nanotube diameter Chem. Phys. Lett. 493 19–23 [5] Lysetskiy L, Panikarskaya V, Sidletskiy O, Kasian N, Kositsyn S, Shtifanyuk P, Lebovka N, Lisunova M and Melezhyk O 2007 Optical transmission and conductivity of nematic liquid crystals containing dispersed multiwall nanotubes Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 478 127–33 3 [6] Lisetski L N, Lebovka N I, Sidletskiy O T, Panikarskaya V D, Kasian N A, Kositsyn S S, Lisunova M O and Melezhyk O V 2007 Spectrophotometry and electric conductivity studies of multiwall nanotubes dispersed in nematic liquid crystals Funct. Mater. 14 (2) 233–7 [7] Ponevchinsky V V, Goncharuk A I, Vasil’ev V I, Lebovka N I and Soskin M S 2010 Cluster Self-Organization of Nanotubes in a Nematic Phase: the Percolation Behavior and Appearance of Optical Singularities JETP Lett. 91(5) 239–42 [8] Ponevchinsky V V, Goncharuk A I, Vasil’ev V I, Lebovka N I and Soskin M S 2009 Selforganized composites of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and nematic liquid crystal 5CB: Optical singularities and percolation behavior in electrical conductivity Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering vol 7388 [16] Jian B-R, Tang C-Y and Lee W 2011 Temperature-dependent electrical properties of dilute suspension of carbon nanotubes in nematic liquid crystals Carbon N. Y. 49 910–4 [17] Fuh A Y-G, Lee W and Huang K Y-C 2013 Deviation of extended Maxwell-Garnett formula for carbon-nanotube doped nematic liquid crystal Liq. Cryst. 40 (6) 745–55 [18] Basu R and Iannacchione G S 2009 Nematic anchoring on carbon nanotubes Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 173113(1–3) [19] Gu M, Yin Y, Shiyanovskii S V and Lavrentovich O D 2007 Effects of dielectric relaxation on the director dynamics of uniaxial nematic liquid crystals Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 76 061702 (1–12) [9] Ponevchinsky V, Goncharuk A I, Vasil’ev V I, Lebovka N I and Soskin M S 2010 Optical singularities induced in a nematic-cell by carbon nanotubes Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering vol 7613 [10] Ponevchinsky V V, Goncharuk A I, Minenko S S, Lisetskii L N, Lebovka N I and Soskin M S 2012 Fine topological structure of coherent complex light created by carbon nanocomposites in LC Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering vol 8274 [11] Lee H S and Yun C H 2008 Translational and Rotational Diffusions of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Static Bending J. Phys. Chem. C 112 10653–8 [12] Lee H S, Yun C H, Kim S K, Choi J H, Lee C J, Jin H-J, Lee H, Park S J and Park M 2009 Percolation of two-dimensional multiwall carbon nanotube networks Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 134104 (1–3) [13] Uchida T and Seki H 1990 Liquid Crystals: Applications and Uses (Vol. 3) ed B Bahadur (Singapore: World Scientific) pp 21–5 [14] Lin F-C, Wu P-C, Jian B-R and Lee W 2013 Dopant effect and cell-configuration-dependent dielectric properties of nematic liquid crystals Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2013, Art. ID 271574 5 [15] Trushkevych O, Golden F, Pivnenko M, Xu H, Collings N, Crossland W A, Muller S and Jakoby R 2010 Dielectric anisotropy of nematic liquid crystals loaded with carbon nanotubes Electron. Lett. 46 (10) 693–5 4