Peer Reviewed Publications

advertisement
Peer-reviewed publications
Professor Ragnar Löfstedt
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Luoma SN, Löfstedt RE. Salmon contamination and the public's trust. Environment Science and
Technology 2007
Löfstedt RE. The Impact of the Cox-2 inhibitor issue on perceptions of the pharmaceutical industry:
Content analysis and communication implications. J of Health Communication 2007; 12:xx
Löfstedt RE. How can we make risk communication better: Where are we and where are we
going? J Risk Research 2006, 9:xx
Löfstedt RE, and Fairman R. Commentary: Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision
making: A European perspective. Risk Analysis 2006; 26:25-31.
Löfstedt RE. Risk communication and management in the twenty-first century. International Public
Management Journal 2004; 7: 335-346.
Löfstedt RE. The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: From precautionary principle to
(regulatory) impact analysis. J of Risk and Uncertainty 2004; 28: 237-260.
Löfstedt RE. Science communication and the Swedish acrylamide 'alarm'. J of Health
Communication 2003; 8:407-430.
Lofstedt RE. Risk communication: Pitfalls and promises. European Review 2003; 11:417-435.
Löfstedt RE. Regulatory Negotiation: The Case of the International Paper’s Hydrodam ReLicensing Procedure in Risk Management: An International Journal, 2003; 4:37-54
Löfstedt RE. A European Perspective on the NRC ‘Red Book’, Risk Assessment in the Federal
Government: Managing the Process. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2003; 9: 13271335.
Löfstedt RE. Public perceptions of the Mars sample return program in Space Policy, 2003; 19:283292.
Löfstedt RE. The Precautionary Principle: Risk, Regulation and Politics. Trans IChemE, 2003;
81:Part B:36-43.
Löfstedt RE, Bostrom, A. Communicating Risk: Wireless and Hardwired. Risk Analysis, 2003;
23:241–248.
Löfstedt RE. Swedish Chemical Regulation: An Overview and Analysis. Risk Analysis, 2003;
23:411–421.
Löfstedt RE. Hormesis and risk communication: A comment to Ortwin Renn. Belle Newsletter,
2002; 11:31-33.
Löfstedt RE, Fischhoff B, and Fischhoff I. Precautionary principles: General definitions and specific
applications to genetically manipulated organisms GMOs. Journal of Policy Analysis and
Management, 2002; 21:381-407.
Löfstedt RE. Good and bad examples of sitting and building biosafety level 4 laboratories: a study
of Winnipeg, Galveston and Etobicoke. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2002; 93: 47-66.
Löfstedt RE. Trust and the nuclear power industry. Environment, 2001; 43:41-43.
Sinclair P, Löfstedt RE. The influence of trust in a biomass application: the case study of Sutton,
UK. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2001; 21:177-184.
Löfstedt RE. Risk and regulation: Boat owners’ perceptions of recent antifouling legislation. Risk
Management: An International Journal, 2001; 3:33-46.
Löfstedt RE, Vogel D. Response to commentaries. Risk Analysis, 2001; 21:577-578.
Löfstedt RE, Vogel D. The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the
United States. Risk Analysis, 2001; 21:399-406.
Löfstedt RE. Playing politics with energy policy: The phase-out of nuclear power in Sweden.
Environment, 2001; 43:20-33.
Löfstedt RE, Ikeda S, Thompson KM. Risk management across the globe: Insights from a
comparative look at Sweden, Japan, and the United States, Risk Analysis. 2000; 20:157-161.
Boholm Å, RE Löfstedt. Issues of risk, trust and knowledge: The Hallandsas tunnel case. Ambio,
1999; 28: 556-561.
Löfstedt RE. The role of trust in the North Blackforest: An evaluation of a citizen panel project.
Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 1999; 10:10-30.
Löfstedt RE, Boholm Å. Off track in Sweden. Environment, 1999; 41:16-20, 40-44.
Löfstedt RE. Transboundary environmental problems: The case of the burning of coal in Poland for
heating and electricity purposes. Global Environmental Change, 1998; 8:329-340.
Löfstedt RE. Sweden’s biomass controversy: a case study of communicating policy issues.
Environment, 1998; 40: 16-20, 42-45.
Löfstedt RE. Sweden’s future energy policy. Energy Policy, 1997; 25: 383-386.
Löfstedt RE. and Renn O. The Brent Spar controversy: An example of risk communication gone
wrong. Risk Analysis, 1997; 17: 131-136.
32. Löfstedt RE. Evaluation of two siting strategies: The case of two UK waste tire incinerators. Risk
Health Safety and Environment, 1997; 8:63-77.
33. Collier U, Löfstedt RE. Think globally act locally? Local climate change and energy policies in
Sweden and the UK. Global Environmental Change, 1997; 7: 25-40.
34. Löfstedt RE. Risk communication: The Barsebäck nuclear plant case. Energy Policy, 1996;
24:689-696.
35. Löfstedt RE. The use of biomass energy in a regional context: the case of Växjö Energi, Sweden.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 1996; 11:33-42.
36. Löfstedt RE.,Sepp K , Kelly L. Partnerships to reduce greenhouse emissions in the Baltic.
Environment, 1996; 38:16-20, 40-42.
37. Löfstedt RE. Fairness across borders: The Barsebäck nuclear power plant. Risk Health, Safety
and Environment, 1996; 7:135-144.
38. Linnerooth-Bayer J. and Löfstedt RE. Fairness and siting: introduction to a symposium. Risk
Health, Safety and Environment, 1996; 7: 95-98.
39. Linnerooth-Bayer J. and Löfstedt RE eds., IIASA Symposium on Fairness and Siting. Special issue
of Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 1996; 7:2.
40. Löfstedt RE. An evaluation of a UK energy conservation programme. Energy and Environment,
1996; 7: 41-49.
41. Löfstedt RE and Sjöstedt, G. Environmental aid to Eastern Europe: problems and possible
solutions. Ambio, 1995; 24:366-370.
42. Löfstedt RE. Observations on Scandinavian ties with the Baltic States in the Post-Soviet era. PostSoviet Geography, 1995; 36:253-256.
43. Löfstedt RE. Why are public perception studies on the environment ignored? Global Environmental
Change, 1995; 5: 83-85.
44. Löfstedt RE. What Factors Determine Sweden's Provision of Environmental Aid to Eastern
Europe? Global Environmental Change, 1995; 5:41-49.
45. Löfstedt RE. A comment to Fisher and Berglund letter to the editor discussing Swedish energy
policy. Futures, 1994; 26:1106-1107.
46. Löfstedt RE. Environmental Aid to Eastern Europe; Swedish and Estonian perspectives. Post
Soviet Geography, 1994; 35:594-607.
47. Löfstedt RE. Energy and Lifestyles in Europe. OGUT, 1993; 13:42-49.
48. Löfstedt RE. Overview-commenting on Nilsson et al. Environment, 1993; 35:5.
49. Löfstedt RE. Lay Perspectives Concerning Global Climate Change in Austria. Energy and
Environment, 1993; 4: 140-154.
50. Löfstedt RE. Risk Communication in the Swedish Energy Sector. Energy Policy, 1993; 21:768-772.
51. Löfstedt RE. Hard Habits to Break: energy conservation patterns in Sweden. Environment, 1993;
35: 11-15, 33 - 36.
52. Löfstedt RE. Lay Perspectives of Global Climate Change in Sweden. Energy and Environment,
1992; 3:161-175.
53. Löfstedt R E. Climate Change Perceptions and Energy-Use. Decisions in Northern Sweden.
Global Environmental Change, 1991; 1: 321-324.
54. Löfstedt RE. Public Perceptions Towards Various Energy Sources in Sweden. Energy. The
International Journal 1991; 16: 1059-1065.
55. Löfstedt RE and White A. Chernobyl: Four Years Later. The Repercussions Continue.
Environment 1990; 32, April: 2-5.
Download