Forces Modeling and Simulation (FMS)

advertisement
Forces Modeling and Simulation (FMS). The top priorities for FMS are:

To leverage the experience and techniques developed by the HPC community
to improve FMS support to the operational warfighter

Conduct militarily relevant research and transition the technologies to
operational programs
FMS will concentrate on:

Addressing critical user needs
 Portability, scalability, responsiveness

Strong operational user focus and involvement

Demonstration based results

Cross-functional area projects.
The FMS FY03 project tasks are:

FMS-03-001: Live / Model Data Reduction As A Means Of Populating
Constructive Simulation Datasets (PI: David R. Pratt, SAIC)

FMS-03-002: Joint Warfare System (JWARS) Performance (PI: Ron Painter,
CACI)

FMS-03-005: An Analysis Of The Use Of Agent-Based Simulations And
Their Application To Scalable Systems (PI: David R. Pratt, SAIC)
The strategic roadmap for FMS is as follows:
Functional Area: FMS
Strategic Focus
FY03
Areas
FY04
FY05
1. User Outreach
FMS Onsite
FMS-UO
2. Technology Transfer
FMS Onsite
FMS-TT
3. Technology Exploration
FY06
FMS-TE
FMS-P
4. Portability
FMS-S
5. Scalability
6. Rapid response /
deployment
FY04-07 areas of concentration for FMS include:
FMS-RRD
FY07

FMS-UO: User Outreach — FMS is a non-traditional HPC area. For this
reason, a concerted effort needs to be made to reach out to the FMS
community to “create the market” for HPC services and resources and to
assist in the transformation of the community's perceptions.

FMS-TT: Technology Transfer — The HPC community has developed a large
number of algorithms and lessons learned concerning the optimization of
parallel codes. This project area has been set up to aid the transition of
experience in the HPC community to the FMS community via pilot projects
that demonstrate the proof of principle and applicability of the technology.

FMS-TE: Technology Exploration — Investigates use of new / novel
technologies to the FMS domain. This effort will be discontinued in favor of
more focused technology area exploration.

FMS-P: Portability — Due to the operational nature of the FMS community,
codes will need to run on commodity deployable hardware in addition to the
HPC resources. This functional area looks into techniques and the application
of tools to make such configuration as seamless and automated as possible.

FMS-S: Scalability — In conjunction with portability, the scalability of codes
is a major concern. The number of entities that can be simulated while
maintaining a fixed time ratio notionally defines scalability. As the systems
scale up (or don’t in many cases) the bottlenecks in the code are exposed. The
purpose of this thrust to leverage the lessons learned with HPC codes to aid in
improvements in reducing or eliminating such bottlenecks.

FMS-RRD: Rapid Response / Deployment — The Air Force’s AETF and
Army’s FCS programs are prime examples of the shift of emphasis from the
cold war force structure to more responsive and “lighter” forces. As a key
component of the training and planning cycle, FMS needs to become more
responsive and able to deploy quickly. In this thrust we examine the ability of
leveraging the horsepower of the HPC resources to provide a rapid “first cut”
capability that can later be refined by the user to suit the operational
commitment.
The FMS UAP includes:

Larry Peterson (SPAWAR-Systems Center, Govt CTA Lead)

Steve Gordon (Air Force Agency for Modeling and Simulation [AFAMS])

Mike Macedonia (U.S. Army Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation
Command [STRICOM])

Dave Hoffman (U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command [TRADOC]
Analysis Center [TRAC]-White Sands Missile Range [WSMR])

Niki Deliman (ERDC / TRAC-Monterey [MTRY])
FMS is in the process of re-examining the membership of the UAP based on the
responsiveness and input from the current members.
Download