INPUT OPTICS CHANGES
-Get new table dimensions, orientation, and document number
(Discuss at meeting)
-Put bases on New Focus mounts
(Done)
-Rotate bases on New Focus mounts, so they fit on the table
(Waiting on new table dimensions)
-Check MC footprint, is it 16.748” X 9.661”?
(Ask Janeen at meeting, based on PROJECTS BY LUKE/input
optics/reference files/SUSPENSIONS GROUP/MCSUS_01.exe)
-Add bevels to MC1,2,3
(Done)
-Is beam well within AR coating?
[Assuming beam radius is 2.114mm(T020027, pg 27), then there is a
22.4mm gap between the edge of the coating to the outside edge of beam]
(20.4mm for refracted beam exiting MC1)
-Add reflected beam exiting MC1, determine how it can exit chamber
(Done)
-Should we add a wedge to the back of MC2, if so how much?
(Review before meeting, see David’s email, and PROJECTS BY
LUKE/input optics/ mode cleaner optics/mc_curved_wedge.xls)
-Show beam transmitted through SM1
[Done, assuming same index of refraction as MC (1.44963), no wedge on
SM1]
-Show Faraday pickoff beam
(Old Faraday isolator pasted in, don’t know what is best way to route pickoff
beams. Why isn’t exiting beam collinear with entering beam?)
-Add thermal lensing compensator
(Add when dimensions become known)
-Is beam exiting Faraday Isolator too close to chamber flange?
(~2.9” from edge, assuming working diameter is 60.75”)
-Should we move MMT1 to the left, so that PRM is easier to access?
(Discuss at meeting, wedge?)
-Determine MMT2 suspension footprint
(Discuss at meeting, see Willems and Romie emails, Coyne layout)
-What is the best way to make the layout available to others?
-PDFs blur the lines, and distances cannot be measured, so DCC is bad
choice.
-I can post the most current CAD file on my webpage:
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~luke/
-Who should be notified when changes are made?
-Questions, suggestions, or requests?