Definition of Community A community is a group of people who are consciously committed to going beyond their personal biases, attitudes, judgment and opinions to achieve a shared vision that would otherwise be impossible. Members agree that the vision is worth the stretch. The truth of a community is beyond the words, titles, and affiliations. It acknowledges discomfort, upset, and fears, as well as the longing and the love that is deep within every human being. “Community isn’t always synonymous with warmth and harmony. Politeness is often a veneer for understanding, when in reality it masks uncovered territory, the unspeakable pit that we turn from because we know the pain and anger that can dwell there. It is important to remind ourselves that real community is forged out of struggle. This is the crucible from which a real community grows” -Linda Christensen Adapted from: Reading, Writing, Rising Up: Teaching about Social Justice and the Power of the Written Word: Rethinking School, 2000. Purpose: Participants will explore how they use language to define and react to dilemmas and actions. Team members will work together to sort a variety of sentence strips into four categories: Language of Complaint, Language of Commitment, Language of Blame, and Language of Personal Responsibility Note: The strips do not have to be in any particular order. Explicitly express what we cannot do Generates productive conversations that lead to problem solving Leave us feeling like a whiny cynical person Generates frustration Hold other people responsible for gaps between intention and reality Raises questions for oneself Explicitly expresses what we stand for Generates vitalizing energy Generates frustration and alienation in the speaker Leaves us feeling like a person filled with conviction and hope Transformational-anchors purpose driven work Transformational-directs our attention to places where we have minimal influence Generates defensiveness in others Non-Transformational-rarely goes anywhere beyond letting off steam Draws on momentum of our commitments and goals Non-Transformational-deflects our attention to places where we have little to no influence Purpose: Participants will explore how they use language to shift how they define and react to dilemmas and actions at their school sites. In part two, participants will determine how to shift the “Language of Complaint, to the “Language of Commitment.” Then, as a team decide how to move from the “Language of Blame” to the “Language of Personal Responsibility”. Note: Each sorting strip has a one to one correlation Language of Complaint Language of Commitment 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. Language of Blame Language of Personal Responsibility 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. Purpose: Team members will discuss what it means to change our discourse to replicate or transform results and outcomes in our schools. Discourse I Singular Truth Improve what exists Techniques, methods, and “Best Practices” Symptoms Answers and solutions Ability and merit Limited time, ability and resources Discourse II Multiple Stories Changing something significant Learning and relationships Causes Dilemmas and inquires Privilege and oppression Getting started anyway How do we collectively define our discourse when it comes to: 1. Team Collaboration 2. Communication 3. School Improvement Goals 4. Problem Solving 5. Accountability 6. Collecting Data 7. Curriculum 8. School Schedules 9. School and District mandates 10. Coaching and Support 11. Professional Development 12. Tiered Initiatives 13. Climate and Culture/Discipline Why should we re-examine our discourse in these thirteen areas? (need more here related to DN model) Reflection: Participants will discuss the feelings that emerged during the activity. Note to facilitator: Connect the activity to an Excerpt from Roland Barth “The Culture Builder” , Educational Leadership vol.59, No.8, May 2002 Ice Breaker Step 1: Think of an element of our model that you are now rethinking or reframing based upon the previously attended sessions. Step 2: Briefly describe the issue, how you have changed your thinking about it and why. Step 3: Examine the photos provided and choose one photograph that represents that issue for you. Step 4: Be ready to share your thoughts with the full group, and the reason you selected the photo. *Photo cards needed. Team Time??? (Possible flow) Identify a goal or objective as from the schools STP. Subsequently each group will use the criteria below to have a productive conversation on problem solving, capacity, and priority Consider the following action and accountability criteria to identify your goal and objectives(s). Control: Does your team have control to change or address this goal or objective Impact: How does this goal or objective impact the Diploma’s Now program? Trend: Based on the data, is the goal likely to get worse, stay the same or get better? What is the potential risk for not addressing it now? Scope: What are the benefits of addressing this goal or objective? How many students, teachers, or team members would benefit? Priority and Urgency: How does the goal or objective fit within the Diploma’s Now goals and pillars? Practicality: What is the likelihood of success? Does your team have access to resources? Is there expertise or guidance available to support this goal or objective? Big Picture: To what extent will addressing this goal or objective prepare school teams to think strategically beyond the current school year or post DN? Accountability: How will addressing this goal or objective improve the implementation and sustainability of the Diploma’s Now Model? ****Components of the STP can go here to have Principals and STF’s begin to think about the new school year together. Possible time to reflect on the past year and areas of the finishing strong plan to start strong for the 2013-14 school year********