SOCY4400 Contemporary Social Theory

advertisement
SOCY4400 Contemporary Social Theory
Summer 2007. Prof. Backman
Weber questions from the textbook
1. When was Weber born and when did he die? Where was he born and where did he die? 221, 225
2. What was Weber's dad like? His mom? 221-3 How were the characteristics of his parents
reflected in his writings?
3. Did Weber have a nervous breakdown? [A: yes] What is usually given as the event that triggered
the breakdown? 223
4. What did Weber think of the progress of capitalism when he visited America? 223 -4
5. What important roles did Weber have at the end of World War I? 224
6. Why would the Junkers not be thrilled by the embourgeoisement of Germany? 226 So what?
[Thought question]
7. T F According to Weber, the human intellect is uniquely well suited to distinguish between
good and evil. 229
8. What, according to the text, was Weber's major sociological project? (Lectures are in agreement
with this.) 232
9. List and describe each of the four types of action in Weber's typology of action. 233
10. You can use either the textbook's definition of power (p. 234) or mine from lecture (the ability
to influence the behavior of others, even in the absence of their consent).
11. How do states (governments) secure their privileged positions? 235
12. You may use the discussion of types of authority on pp. 235-6 to reinforce lecture discussion of
the same topic, though note that A&O's discussion of charismatic leadership has a slightly different
focus than mine.
13. Use the discussion of ideal types to reinforce lecture discussion of ideal types. 240-2
14. Don’t be confused by the discussion of rationalism at the end of the chapter (pp. 245 -7). Instead
use my discussion of rationality (which I stole from Randall Collins). See the overheads attached
below.
Define (from the textbook): 252-3
asceticism
authority
charisma and charismatic authority
ideal type
legitimate authority
problem of theodicy
rational-legal authority
routinization of charisma
traditional authority
value freedom
Weimar Republic
Weber questions from lecture
1. What are the central characteristics of a bureaucracy, according to Weber? What were Weber’s
feelings about the productivity of bureaucratic organizations?
2. What is the place of emotions in Weber’s work? (Be sure to mention the “iro n cage.”)
3. Present Weber’s analysis of the stratification system. Be sure to mention the three spheres of
stratification and the one that he felt ultimately was most decisive in structuring society.
4. Describe Weber’s three types of domination.
5. Describe two of the methodological tools Weber emphasized.
6. Present Weber’s theory in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. How does this
theory “turn Marx on his head?”
7. Why might Nietzsche sometimes be considered anti-rational? Why is the charge of antirationality somewhat misleading in Nietzsche’s case?
8. What did Weber’s wife do?
9. Define (in Weber’s terms): Verstehen, ideal type, class, status group, power [important], the
problem of succession
10. What did Weber feel was primarily responsible for the transition of Western Europe from its
situation after the fall of Rome to the situation during his lifetime?
11. What three aspects of Weber’s analysis of rationality did we discuss in lecture. [Note that the
text identifies a somewhat different three; use mine, not theirs.] [See the attached information
below.]
12. “Value neutrality” is a term often associated with Weber. What does it have to do with Weber?
Overheads I often use in SOCY1000 when discussing Weber
Max Weber and Rationality
_____________________________________________________________
Max Weber (Mocks VAY-bur) argued that increasing rationality in social life was key to the
development of Europe in the centuries after the fall of Rome
_____________________________________________________________
Weber’s three forms of rationality:
1. Knowledge of how to achieve desired ends
2. Predictability and regularity in complex systems, especially the market and government
3. Active efforts to master or change the world
Put another way, Weber argued Europe owed its social and economic structure to 1) cause and
effect knowledge, 2) predictable markets and governments, and 3) norms encouraging actors,
individual and corporate, to take advantage of knowledge and predictabili ty
The results were dramatic:
Better life chances
Fabulous economic productivity
Unprecedented military might
Weber argued there are aspects of human behavior that are emotional, not rational
Seen in bureaucracies, leadership
Bureaucracies:
are better ways of organizing large scale efforts than any previous way of organizing
minimize individuality among bureaucrats
minimize emotional behavior
can be “iron cages” in which we accomplish a great deal, but at great emotional cost
Forms of Authority/Leadership/ Followership
1.
Traditional leadership: we follow the leader because we always have (e.g., in a hereditary
monarchy)
2.
Rational-legal leadership: we follow the leader because the rules or the laws tell us to (this is
the basis for bureaucracies)
3.
Charismatic leadership: we follow the leader because we like the leader and want to please
him or her (such authority is non-rational)
Weber’s Definition of Class
_____________________________________________________________
A number of people sharing some of the same bases for their “life chances,” where those bases
depend on the possession of goods and opportunities and on the conditions of the market, including
conditions for access to the market
_____________________________________________________________
The most enduring class distinctions are between people whose income is based on their property
(the propertied) and people whose income is based entirely on their labor (the non -propertied)
Download