Northwood Planning Commissions Regular Meeting
Date December 8, 2014
Time
Heading
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Location Council
Chambers
Record of Proceedings for Northwood Planning
Commission – Regular Meeting of December 8, 2014
The regular meeting of the Northwood Planning
Commission was called to order by John Melnyk,
Chairman on Monday, December 8, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the Northwood Municipal
Building.
The roll was called by Kimberly Vaculik, Planning,
Zoning & Economic Development Coordinator. Those
in attendance were:
Members: Chairman John Melnyk, Mayor Mark Stoner,
Mr. Venzke, Mr. Burns, Mr. Tewers, Mr. Kamilaris,
City Engineer Dave Kuhn & Planning, Zoning &
Economic Development Coordinator Kimberly Vaculik
Mr. Delventhal was absent.
Motion to Excuse
the Absent:
Mr. Venzke made a motion to excuse Mr. Delventhal,
second by Mr. Burns.
Vote: Mr. Venzke-Yes; Mr. Burns-Yes; Chairman
Melnyk-Yes; Mayor Stoner-Yes; Mr. Tewers-Yes; Mr.
Kamilaris-Yes
Motion Passed.
Approval of
Minutes for
Planning
Commission
Motion to approve the minutes from the regular Planning
Commission meeting of November 10, 2014.
Chairman Melnyk made a motion to approve the
minutes, second by Mr. Kamilaris.
Vote: Chairman Melnyk-Yes; Mr. Kamilaris-Yes; Mayor
Stoner-Yes; Mr. Venzke- Yes; Mr. Burns-Yes; Mr.
Tewers-Yes
Motion Passed.
New Items for
Review
Northwestern Water & Sewer is requesting Preliminary
site plan approval to build an above ground 2 million
gallon sanitary sewer overflow storage tank between
Wise St. and Curtice Rd. on Parcel #50-812350000022000
Mr. Tom Stalter, P.E., Manager of Engineering of
Northwestern Water and Sewer District, 12560
Middleton Pike, Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 and
Mr. Ted Bennett, P.E., Associate, Project Engineer for
Jones & Henry Engineers, Ltd.,3103 Executive Parkway,
Suite 300, Toledo, Ohio 43606 were in attendance to
speak on behalf of their project. Also in attendance is
Eric Chamberlin, Engineer NWSD and Rex Huffman,
Solicitor for the District.
Mr. Stalter: We have an agreement with the City of
Oregon for treatment of the flow for the 200 area which
includes Northwood and goes down South to Millbury.
The 200 area is indicated in green on the maps provided.
Northwestern Water This all travels through one main line into the City of
& Sewer Oregon and is treated then runs into Lake Erie. Oregon
Preliminary site
has an agreement with the EPA to make improvements to
plan for sanitary their system which has effected NWSD. We can now
sewer overflow tank only allow 5 million gallons per day to run into Oregon.
Under dry weather this is fine however, under wet
weather and the conditions of the sewers this causes a
problem. Our contract was renewed with Oregon in
April. The new contract mandates that we put in a new
control structure for the flow which goes to Oregon, flow
metering, and a 2 million gallon storage basin. The work
according to the contract is supposed to be done by
October 2015, we are behind schedule. We reviewed the
flow and in 18 months we exceeded 5 million gallons a
day 60 times. The basin will be used to catch the excess
and hold it temporarily.
We have been working on INI- infiltration inflow
reduction which consists of repairs to the sewer system
which we have been doing throughout the district. This is
way too expensive with diminishing returns. This takes
years to do and results are uncertain. Occasionally man
hole covers are taken off to allow storm water to drain
into the sanitary sewer, this is a problem. Anytime there
is an overflow to our system or Oregon's system, we are a
large part of that. The City of Oregon has some direct
overflow into Lake Erie.
Mr. Bennett: (Showing areas on maps provided) The site
needs to be near the 48" trunk sewer (red line on map)
which runs North and South, between Curtice Rd. and
Williston Rd. We need to get the water from the 48"
trunk sewer into the basin. The further we put it away the
more it raises the costs (more piping cost). We need it to
be near the downstream end of the trunk sewer to make it
function most efficient as possible and it must be
upstream of the City of Oregon because they read the
flow coming out of the district, they need the flow to be
limited. When high flows persist in the system, exceeding
5 mg/d the flow backs up. We are going to set a level for
when the flow backs up, not sure what level yet. Talked
about options, above grade and below grade storage pipe
line. We wanted to do underground line which fills and
empties by gravity however the cost is much higher. We
looked at couple different options to configure piping.
The pipes were going to be 9' in diameter and 30' deep.
We ran into problems with Toledo Edison clearance with
the towers to dig for the pipes. Also, there are also some
wetlands North of Wise St. We began to think a
trenchless option would be the way to go. All options
were 2 million gallons. The above grade will have
pumps, the overflow will have to pump up into the basin.
If there is an event that the basin fills up and the 5 million
gallons has gone to Oregon, there will be a built in
overflow to allow the excess to get away. There will be a
surcharge on extra flow but it won't flood anyone out;
there will be an emergency method to get rid of the flow.
The tank will be beautified, there are different options for
texture, finishes etc.
We looked at cost, underground $7 to 8 million, above
grade basin just under $5 million. Maintenance costs are
greater for above ground because of pumps and moving
parts.
These are costs that get passed to the customers of the
district so the district is trying to choose the most cost
effective option for this project. Pumping is the primary
difference between the options. The pipeline option
construction would be complete approximately Aug 2016
and the same would be true for the above grade basin.
Although we are more optimistic for the above ground
basin to be built by January 2016. The tank will be
approximately 1300' East of Eden East. I want to
distinguish this project from a different sewer project the
district is going to be working on at the Wise St. pumping
station, which will parallel with wise St. So if you see dirt
being moved around, don't worry it is a separate project.
Chairman Melnyk asked if there was anyone else in
attendance wishing to speak in favor of the project. No
one else wished to speak. Chairman Melnyk asked City
Engineer Dave Kuhn to read his comments.
City Engineer, Dave Kuhn: These are my comments
dated December 1, 2014, I am amending them after some
research was done by our City Attorney.
1) The applicant is proposing to construct a 20 foot
high 2 million gallon above ground flow equalization
basin on a 2.07 acre parcel of land that is presently
owned by Louisville Title Agency N.W. Ohio, Inc.
(Hirzel Canning Co.). The proposed location of the
basin is approximately 1,350 feet east of the nearest
house in the Greenway Estates Subdivision. The
purpose of the basin is to capture and store sanitary
flows in excess of the contract flow rate limitation to
the City of Oregon.
The parcel is zoned "A-1" Agricultural District and
is surrounded by parcels zoned "A-1" Agricultural
District except in the southeast corner in which the
parcel is zoned "R" Suburban Residential for possible
expansion of the Crosscreek Meadows Subdivision.
The basin meets the setback requirements of the
zoning district. I looked at the use of the facility and
this is where the City Attorney did some research and
since NWSD is a political subdivision it would be
considered a public facility and would meet the
requirements under Section 1254.02( a ) ( 6 ) of the
Northwood City Zoning Code. Per Brian, the
Planning Commission (under the ORC Section 713.04)
can control the height, design of the building etc.
2) Comments from the Zoning Inspection Report
shall be included in the final site plan approval of the
Planning Commission.
Ms. Vaculik: I have the same comments as Dave.
3) A set of final site plans shall be submitted to the
City of Northwood's Fire Chief to review the
location of the hydrants, fire apparatus access and
other equipment items. Comments from the Fire
Chief shall be included in the final site plan approval
of the Planning Commission.
Ms. Vaculik: The Fire Chief's only comment was
concerning the EPA, what are their requirements for a
project like this and he wanted to make sure all
regulations are adhered to. The Police Chief had no
comments.
4) A set of final site plans shall be submitted to the
City of Northwood's Police Chief to review vehicular
access and public safety items. Comments from the
Police Chief shall be included in the final site plan
approval of the Planning Commission.
5) Add on the final site plan a legal description of the
proposed parcel according to Section 1250.12 (b) (2)
of the City Zoning Code. Furthermore, since the parcel
is landlocked, an access easement needs to be recorded
before the City can approve a lot split.
6) Show on the final site plan the metes and bounds
description of all property lines that match the legal
description according to Section 1250.12 (b) (7) of
the City Zoning Code.
7) Show on the final site plan how the storm water
flowing off the facility will be directed away from the
adjacent properties and meet Northwood's drainage
design requirements. Also, since more than one acre
of land will be disturbed, an EPA NOI Permit will
need to be obtained and a SWP3 Plan will need to be
submitted for review.
8) Since the site is unmanned, parking will not be
required. However, for service calls a minimum of
two parking spaces is recommended with one being a
handicap space. The parking area shall be paved with
asphalt.
9) If outside security lighting will be installed at the
site, provide a photometric plan at the final site plan
submittal.
10) Since this site is approximately 1350 feet to the
nearest residential home, we would recommend
mounding and landscape screening around the entire
site. A landscape plan shall be submitted at the final
site plan submittal.
11) Provide additional information on the pump
station building shown on the preliminary site. At the
final site plan submittal provide the City Planning
Commission with elevation views of the building.
Chairman Melnyk opened up the meeting for public
comments.
Residents who
spoke for/against
the project:
Dan Mikolajczyk, 2513 Skagway, Northwood, Ohio
Wants to know who owns the land Northwestern is
proposing to build on? Are there any other existing above
ground tanks in Ohio? Are our rates going up again? Do
we allow this type of use under the zoning code?
Dave Kuhn: Yes, per our City Attorney Brian it's a
public service facility, it is a permitted use under A-1
Agricultural.
Mr. Mikolajczyk: Where will the overflow go? Why not
put it closer to the source in Oregon? People wouldn't
complain as much there because it is not surrounded by
residences. I am against having this above ground tank.
That is a prime area for redevelopment and once the mall
is gone things will come back around. I don't think it will
look that bad, but we will smell it. The problem of the
storm water getting into the sanitary sewer was amplified
in 2006 when farmers were draining their fields into the
sanitary sewer. Were they fined? Why can't you lock the
man hole covers?
Mr. Stalter: Northwood Realty owns the land, Mr.
Hirzel is on the Board. Northwestern has not done an
appraisal on the land so they haven't negotiated any price
nor have they purchased the land yet. There are other
above ground tanks in Ohio, there are concrete, steel (in
Gibsonburg) and open basins (in Oak Harbor).
Yes, Rates will go up again however they won't be as
high with the above ground tank as they would with
underground. The difference would be about $10.
Mr. Bennett: There is a potential for odors however the
tank will have a system to catch the odors and send them
back into the basin. We will put a slight negative pressure
on it which will push the odors right back into the sewer
lines.
Mr. Mikolajczyk: Will it have back up power?
Mr. Bennett: We are not sure yet, it is conceivable to
have it there.
Mr. Stalter: We looked at putting it in Oregon however
it's very populated along the trunk line. The tank must be
located where we have chosen because we need it
downstream of the sewers but upstream of the control
structures. The tank is 30' tall with the dome 10' to 12'
and 20' of the outer wall exposed. Approximately 25' will
be exposed, we plan to put screening around it.
Northwood could help decide colors, screening etc.
Jim Crane, 166 Bradner Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Mr. Crane: I spoke to NWSD two weeks ago and they
never said that it would have no odor. There will be an
odor. There is always an odor on Curtice Rd. ditch,
sewage always has an odor. How will the tank effect
property values? This is prime property (East of
Lemoyne) for development of homes. No developer will
look favorably on having this type of tank in their back
yard. Council needs to oppose this project.
Mr. Stalter: The smell won't be any worse than what is
already there. Having the sewer should help property
values because it will alleviate flooding problems
residents currently face.
Lila Utter, 3412 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Utter: Agricultural land must be preserved as in
accordance with the City's Comprehensive Master Plan.
We recognize the need for this tank however we don't
want the smell, bury the tank. There is conflict with
building the tank and Northwood's Master Plan.
Northwood has already allowed a big box store to be
built (Menards) in an area that was supposed to be
residential. We should stay with Master Plan in a way in
which everyone is happy. I am against this project.
Ms. Vaculik: Menards is in Oregon, Northwood only has
the access road to it.
Fritz Kalmbach, 3329 Bordeaux Rue, Northwood, Ohio
Mr. Kalmbach: What happens if we allow an above
ground tank that has a catastrophic failure? That could
have an enormous impact on the community. When these
decisions are made, a full analysis should be done on the
potential of a failure. I am opposed to the project.
Mr. Stalter: This tank will be empty 95% of the time. It
is a concrete tank which is extremely strong however,
anything can fail, it could get hit by a plane. It's a remote
possibility, even an underground tank could fail.
Mr. Bennett: The tank will be buried 10' underground,
2/3rds volume is already underground. There will be
pumps in the tank that even if they are running it can still
run back into the sewer. Most of the volume is from
storm water getting into the sanitary system.
Carol Harris, 703 Hanson St., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Harris: There is an Eagle in the woods that I like to
watch. I am concerned about the odor, noise and lights. I
am deeply opposed to this project, I have lived here for
13 years and do not approve of this project.
Mr. Stalter: There would only be noise during the wet
weather. The lighting can be turned down and they are
aware of the Eagle's nest, the tank must be 600' away
from the nest per federal law. We've done an
environmental report on it.
Carol Crosser, 3985 Dalling Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Crosser: The difference in the monthly cost is $10
for underground, what is the difference between the two?
I think most residents would be willing to pay the
difference to have this put underground than to have our
property values decreased.
Mr. Stalter: For the above ground it will add about $2$3 per month and for underground it would add $10-$12
to the monthly bill.
Jim Crane: The $10 to $12 is going to be distributed
among all of the district?
Mr. Stalter: That hasn't been decided yet. It could be
distributed among all of the district or just the residents in
the 200 area.
Mayor: If the above ground tank project is estimated to
cost the district $5 Million which will cost the residents
an additional $2 to $3 a month, why is the difference of
an additional $2 Million for the underground make the
cost jump up to $10 to $12 a month? What is past
practice on billing? Northwood will end up paying twice
on it, once to look at it and we will have to pay for it as
well.
Mr. Stalter: I don't have the exact numbers for the
monthly charges it depends if all of the district will be
billed or if they only charge the 200 area. The district
tries to keep it consistent. If only a certain area will
benefit then generally they are the only ones who will
pay, if it benefits a wider area then everyone will be
charged.
Chairman Melnyk: When Northwood joined the district
years ago, we were told that all costs would be shared by
the whole district.
Mr. Stalter: Northwood never joined the district. I
apologize we don't have the exact numbers and we will
get you those answers.
Dave Cufr, 228 Bradner Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Mr. Cufr: I haven't seen the Curtice Rd. flow control
structure. Is all of Northwood serviced by NWSD? Is
Northwood feeding into this line?
Brian Ballenger: The district controls all lines in
Northwood. It's the customers in the 200 area that feed
into the line.
Mr. Bennett: The Curtice Rd. flow control structure is a
below grade structure. We will add a flow meter to it. It
will be just minor modifications done to it.
Carolyn Schimmel, 2239 Richmand Dr., Northwood,
Ohio
Ms. Schimmel: We own land on Curtice Rd., we are
opposed to a poop tank, it will decrease our property
values. Mr. Hirzel has okayed the tank however not
everyone wants to hold onto land. We may want to re sell
at some point and this will only hurt that. We expected
better numbers and an outline from NWSD. This will
affect our lives. We are very against this project. If it's a
necessity to have the tank, then put it under ground.
1:09
Donna Bear, 4909 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Bear: We are opposed. If the project gets denied
where does NWSD go from here, how will it affect the
residents if this is not done?
Mr. Stalter: We will proceed with the design unless we
are told by our Board to stop. We are under contract with
Oregon and will be in violation of the contract if the
project does not continue. There will be implications that
are negative if the project is not done however, we cannot
predict what they will be. We could get into issues with
EPA. If it's not done, there could be Attorneys fees, EPA
fines however we really aren't sure what will happen.
Jim Crane: How are you spreading the cost of the
project around, over Northwood or all of the district?
Most of the overflow comes from Lake Township,
correct?
Mr. Stalter: A lot comes from our district, some comes
from Millbury a lot of theirs is run off illegally. We have
17,000 to 18,000 residents that pay but if the project
really only helps Northwood, then the cost may only
affect Northwood residents. Jerry City just got new sewer
lines so it might not be fair for them to have to pay for
this project which only will help the 200 area. As it is
right now, everyone in the district would pay but if
Northwood has certain requirements, then they may have
to look at the project to see who would be charged.
Mr. Crane: Why would Northwood pay when you just
acknowledged that most of the problem comes from
Millbury?
Mr. Stalter: Cost is our primary concern and we will
look at everything. For the above ground it will add about
$2-$3 per month and for underground it would add $10$12 to the monthly thoroughly however I do not have all
the information right now. We are under time constraints
due to our contract with Oregon which requires the
project be completed by October 2015.
Mr. Kamilaris: Why did you wait so long? Why haven't
you brought it to Planning Commission before now?
How much will it cost us?
Mr. Stalter: We had started talking in August and had
previous meetings with the staff over a year ago. I don't
have the figures, we didn't have enough notice.
Dan Mikolajczyk: I received my notice November 21st.
If you want to do the project fine, just don't do it in our
back yards. Is NWSD going to use eminent domain?
Cathy Moore, 2511 Eden East Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Moore: This project will literally be in our backyard.
I moved here 21 years ago and this will be a horrible
mistake if Northwood approves it. I already pay a lot for
water and sewer bills but I would rather pay an extra
$10/month. There is a better place for a tank like this.
The levy just passed for the schools so that will help
Northwood. NWSD should have better prepared tonight.
I am opposed to this project.
1:22:01
Keith Heyman, 4422 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Mr. Heyman: How will you access the tank? How often
will you go to the site?
Mr. Stalter: We will access it by extending the drive off
Wise St. and we will go to the site probably 2 to 3 times a
week. There is going to be a fan in the tank which will
suck the smell and push it back down the sewer so there
will be no smell.
Michelle Nyers, 2510 Eden East Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Ms. Nyers: Is Mr. Hirzel receiving payment? Why can't
you put this in another area like down on Woodville Rd.
at the wastewater plant? This will affect our property
values. I am completely against this project.
Mr. Bennett: The wastewater plant on Woodville is no
longer owned by the district, they sold that site to a
contractor. We chose the site we did from a technical
standpoint.
Ms. Nyers: Is Mr. Hirzel receiving a stipend for his
property?
Mr. Stalter: We are not sure yet.
Chuck Wood, 4119 Wise St., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is against the proposed project. We don't need
another eye sore.
Ron Kozina, 5389 Billman Rd., Millbury, Ohio 43447
(Owner of Parcel M50-812-260301001000, 0 Curtice
Rd., Northwood, Ohio)
Stated he is against above ground.
Shannon Albright, 168 Bradner Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated she is strongly opposed.
Scott Deaner, 2551 Eden East Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is against the proposed project.
Scott Schloegl, 144 Chantilly Rue, Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed. Rates are already too high.
1:29
Carol Cantrell, 3902 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated she is opposed.
Gary Baumbach, 2515 Revilla Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Stated that Northwestern should focus on separating the
sanitary and storm sewer lines. He is opposed to the
above ground tank.
Carol Albright, 2510 Revilla Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Stated she is opposed to the above ground tank.
Ron Albright, 2510 Revilla Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to the project, he would like more
information from Northwestern.
Nate Cantrell, 3902 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is against the proposed project.
Dave Waddell, 3787 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to above ground.
Oral Robinett, 2548 Eden East Dr., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to the proposed project.
Bob Utter, 3412 Curtice Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to the project.
Michael Albright, 168 Bradner Rd., Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed the project.
Craig Bechtel, 265 Chantilly Rue, Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to the project.
George Parker, 241 Chantilly Rue, Northwood, Ohio
Stated he is opposed to the project.
Pat Aiello, 1920 Parc Rue, Northwood, Ohio
I would like more information. Stated she is opposed to
the project.
Chairman Melnyk: We have gone over the information
we have received and studied it. We have sent out public
notices and published it in the paper so people can come
to the meeting to ask questions and get answers. Our
monthly meetings are always an open forum.
1:33
Chairman Melnyk: Is there grant money available for
this project?
Mr. Stalter: We applied for grant funding however all
we received were low interest loans.
Chairman Melnyk: Northwood received money
previously to separate our sanitary and storm lines, why
haven't other Cities in the County?
Mr. Stalter: This is for a system that is already
separated. In my experience, people don't spend money
on things until they are forced to.
Mr. Venzke: Why isn't it feasible to put the tank
underground?
Mr. Stalter: It is feasible but will cost more. It will
function the same, the odor issues will be the same for
either option. The above ground will only have a visual
impact. The district is trying to save money.
Mr. Venzke: Why would it cost $2 million more to have
it underground?
Mr. Stalter: It would require bigger pipes, they would be
digging down 40' and would have to add 2 additional
pipes.
Mr. Venzke: Will you be using the existing pipes,
pumping it up?
Mr. Stalter: Yes.
Mayor: Why can't you bury the tank?
Mr. Stalter: It is not designed for it, it is only designed
for a partial burial.
Mayor: If you build it the way you propose, I would like
to see other screening. Arborvitae die within 10 years,
why not put in Maple trees, Oak trees etc. I would like to
see better landscaping so the tank would not be visible.
The height bothers me. I also think that this type of use
really doesn't fit in with the typical agricultural use of
farms, pigs, cattle. You don't see these in agricultural
areas.
Mr. Stalter: These tanks are all over in agricultural
places.
Mayor: I don't care if they are in other places, you don't
see them in Northwood. There are about 60 people here,
28 of whom have stood up and spoken against this
project. I'm speaking on behalf of my residents. What
happens when the tank isn't needed? We would want the
tank removed when not in operation.
Mr. Stalter: We don't want to have to do this project
either and we are not here to make people mad. It is
possible to work something out if and when the tank is
not needed.
Mr. Burns: I'm not against the project and I do
understand that it is needed however I am opposed to
where and how you want to do it. If not totally
underground, is it possible to lower the tank? I have very
serious reservations about it being built there.
Mr. Stalter: We've chosen that location because the tank
must be between the control station in Northwood and the
City of Oregon. The tank is 30' to the side not including
the dome, which will be buried 15.' So it will be smaller
than what is shown on the slide provided.
Mr. Kamilaris: There are no other options?
Mr. Stalter: No, nothing reasonable.
Mr. Kamilaris: I already pay too much for my water
bill, our rates got raised when we went to monthly billing
and we didn't get any upgrades for it. Why are you
putting this in now? The land around it will never be
developed if this goes in, why not put it in Oregon?
Mr. Stalter: The closest home is about 1300' away from
the proposed tank. It's just not feasible to put it in
Oregon.
City Engineer Kuhn: You do have two options, one
underground and one above ground.
Mr. Stalter: Right but no other location is possible.
Mr. Tewers: I am disappointed that there are only two
options. I think if you came back with another option
such as burying most of the tank, it would be easier to
hide with landscaping. I understand that odors are easier
to control with an above ground tank than they used to be
however, I agree with the residents, this isn't the place for
that type of tank.
Mayor: I was told by Jerry Greiner from NWSD that
when the district went to monthly billing my bill would
not go up. I just want to say that our monthly bills did go
up, so that wasn't accurate.
Mayor Stoner made a motion to approve the
preliminary site plan for NWSD to allow an above
ground 2 million gallon sanitary sewer overflow
storage tank, second by Chairman Melnyk.
Vote: Mayor Stoner-No; Chairman Melnyk-No; Mr.
Venzke -No; Mr. Burns - No; Mr. Tewers - No; Mr.
Kamilaris - No
Motion Failed.
Chairman Melnyk: I personally am for the project to be
underground. You may resubmit revised plans to
Planning Commission for future review.
Pending Items:
Nuisance Code ( Property Management)
Next Planning
Commission
January 12, 2015 at 6:00 PM
Chairman's Report:
No report.
City Engineer's
Report:
No report.
Zoning:
The code changes that went before Council for signage,
CBD, Pools etc. were approved at Council's regular
meeting of December 4, 2014. They also approved the
zoning changes for 2191 Drouillard from C-Commercial
to M-2 Heavy Industrial and 4510 Woodville Rd. (back
portion only) from CBD to C-Commercial.
Adjournment:
There being no further business before the Planning
Commission and all being in favor, the meeting
adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Attest:
Kimberly Vaculik, Planning, Zoning & Economic
Development Coordinator
Chairman John Melnyk
Approved:
Produced by FTR Log Notes™
www.ftrgold.com