EURAMET Project Form
Document:
Approved:
G-OPS-TMP-024
Head of Secretariat
Version: 2.0
2012-02-01
1
Status
proposed
agreed
Reference No:
(if already existing)
2
Subject Field
3
Type of collaboration
3A.
In the case of a comparison
Registered as Key comparison (KC) or Supplementary Comparison (SC) in the KCDB:
no
yes
If yes: No. of KC/SC:
In case of a KC: Protocol approved by the responsible CC WG?
no
yes
4
Coordinator
Institute/Country:
Name:
Phone:
E-mail:
5
Participating Partners
5A
EURAMET members or associates (Institute’s standard acronym with country code in
brackets) as registered on EURAMET website.
5B
Institutes not being EURAMET members or associates (Institute’s full name and country in
brackets)
6
Title of project
7
Description
8
Additional Information (e.g. external funding available, pilot lab different to coordinator in
case of comparisons etc.)
9.
Starting date/
10.
proposed starting date
Expected completion date
Notes for completion of the form overleaf
EURAMET e.V.
Bundesallee 100
38116 Braunschweig
Germany
Phone: +49 531 592 1960
Fax:
+49 531 592 1969
secretariat@euramet.org
www.euramet.org
11.
Date
NOTES FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE FORM (numbers refer to boxes overleaf)
Forms are to be sent to the EURAMET Secretariat (secretariat@euramet.org) as word or pdf file
- by the TC Chair or
- by the proposer/coordinator of the project with copy to the TC Chair.
If the proposer/coordinator is not EURAMET TC contact person the national contact person(s) of the relevant
TC(s) have to be involved in the registration process.
2
Subject Field: Projects can be related to one or more Technical Committees.
3
Type of collaboration: The type of collaboration being proposed should be defined as one of the
following:



Cooperation in research
Comparison of measurement standards
Consultation on facilities
Note: For ‘Traceability’ projects please use the specific form ‘EURAMET Projects: Traceability’.
3A
In the case of KC or SC to be registered in the KCDB, the coordinator should be aware that the
protocol should be sent to the appropriate CC WG for approval (KC) or information (SC).
In the case of a KC can take place only if its protocol is approved by the appropriate CC Working
Group.
The KC/SC must be compatible and linkable to the parent CC comparison. Once the CC-WG has
approved the protocol, the KC/SC can be registered in the KCDB by filling the appropriate BIPM
form.
4
Coordinator: The full details of the person who is proposing the collaboration and will be piloting the
project.
7
Description: A brief description of the proposed collaboration should be given. Sufficient detail
should be provided so researchers in other institutes can assess whether it is appropriate for them to
seek to join the collaboration.
8
Additional Information This box provides the opportunity for adding any additional information
relevant to the proposed collaborative project (e.g. previous collaborations, external funding available
etc).
9
Starting date/proposed starting date: If the collaboration is still at a preliminary stage a proposed
starting date should be given, otherwise the agreed starting date.
10
Expected completion date: An expected completion date must be given. For permanent
agreements (e.g. devolvement of primary standards) "ON-GOING" should be entered.
11
Date of transmission to EURAMET Secretariat.
EURAMET Projects
2/2
Document:
Approved:
G-OPS-TMP-024
Head of Secretariat
Version: 2.0
2012-xx-xx