References
Austin, P. C. (2008). A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical
literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2037–2049
Austin, P. C., Grootendorst, P., & Anderson, G. M. (2007). A comparison of the ability of
different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated
subjects: A Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 734-753.
Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Stürmer, T.
(2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163,
1149-1156.
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2007). Some practical guidance for the implementation of
propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72.
D’Agostino, R. B. & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Estimating and using propensity scores with
partially missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 749-759.
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies:
reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of American Statistical Association, 94,
1053-1062.
Hansen, B. B. (2008). Commentary: Developing practical recommendations for the use
of propensity scores. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2050-2054.
Haviland, A., & Nagin, D. S., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2007). Combining propensity score
matching and group-based trajectory analysis in an observational study. Psychological Methods,
12, 247-267.
Hill, J. (2004). Reducing bias in treatment effect estimation in observational studies
suffering from missing data. ISERP Working Paper, 1, 1-27.
Hill, J. (2008). Commentary: Developing practical recommendations for the use of
propensity scores. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2055-2061.
Hill, J., & Reiter, J. P. (2006). Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity
score matching. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 2230-2256.
Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average
treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71, 1161-1189.
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2004). Matchit: Matching as
nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Obtained online at
http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit/
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric
preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis,
15, 199–236.
Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2006). Evaluating kindergarten retention policy: a case
study of causal inference for multi-level observational data. Seminar Series Paper, Department
of Statistics, University of Chicago.
Hong, G., & Yu, B. (2008). Effects of kindergarten retention on children’s socialemotional development: An application of propensity score method to multivariate multi-level
data. Special Section on New Methods in Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 407-421.
Imai, K. & Van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes:
generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 854-866.
Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response
functions. Biometrika, 87, 706-710.
Kaplan, D. (1999). An extension of the propensity score adjustment method for the
analysis of group differences in MIMIC models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 467-492.
Kim, J. and Seltzer, M. (2007) Causal Inference in Multilevel Settings in which Selection
Process Vary across Schools. Working Paper 708, Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE): Los
Angeles.
Luellen, J. K., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2005). Propensity scores: An introduction
and experimental test. Evaluation Review, 29, 530-558.
Lunceford, J. K., & Davidian, M. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity
score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Statistics in Medicine, 23,
2937-2960.
McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation
with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological
Methods, 9, 403-425.
Ming, K., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2000). Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching
with a variable number of controls. Biometrics, 56, 118-124.
Ming, K., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2001). A note on optimal matching with variable controls
using the assignment algorithm. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 455-463.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989). Optimal matching for observational studies. Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 84, 1024-1032.
Rosenbaum, P. R, & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of propensity scores in
observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using
subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70,
516-524.
Rubin, D. B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity
scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 757-763.
Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling,
decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322-331.
Rubin, D. B. & Thomas, N. (1996). Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating
theory to practice. Biometrics, 52, 249-264.
Rubin, D. B. & Thomas, N. (2000). Combining propensity score matching with
additional adjustments to prognostic covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
95, 573-585.
Schafer, J. L., & Kang, J. D. Y. (in press). Average causal effects from observational
studies: a practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods.
Sekhon, J. S. (in press). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with
automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software.
Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. (in press). Can nonrandomized experiments
yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random to nonrandom assignment.
Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Shah, B. R., Laupacis, A., Hux, J. E., & Austin, P. C. (2005). Propensity score methods
gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: A systematic
review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 550-559.
Stuart, E. (in press). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look
forward. Statistical Science.
Stuart, E. A. (2008). Commentary: Developing practical recommendations for the use of
propensity scores. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2062-2065.
Stürmer, T., Joshi, M., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., Rothman, K., & Schneeweiss, S. (2006). A
review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in
specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional
multivariable matching methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 437-447.
Stürmer, T., Schneeweiss, S., Brookhart, M. A., Rothman, K. J., Avorn, J., & Glynn, R. J.
(2005). Analytic strategies to adjust confounding using exposure propensity scores and disease
risk scores: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and short-term mortality in the elderly.
American Journal of Epidemiology ,161, 891-898.
Yanovitzky, I., Zanutto, E., & Hornik, R. (2005). Estimating causal effects of public
health education campaigns using propensity score methodology. Evaluation and Program
Planning, 28, 209-220.
Zanutto, E., Lu, B., & Hornik, R. (2005). Using propensity score subclassification for
multiple treatment doses to evaluate a national antidrug media campaign. Journal of Behavioral
and Educational Statistics, 30, 59-73.