November 4 marked the 35th anniversary of the seizure of the U.S.

advertisement
November 4 marked the 35th anniversary of the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. For the
ensuing 444 days, the hostage crisis was at the top of international news. U.S. news programs
often started and ended their coverage with a daily count of the days since the start of the hostage
crisis with titles like “America Held Hostage.”
Prior to that event, the Iranian provisional government, led by Mehdi Bazargan, had been
attempting to re-establish good relations with the United States. President Carter had hoped to
build a strategic anti-communist alliance with the new Iranian state. Given the strong anticommunist character of all the factions of the Iranian government and the conciliatory tendency
of the Bazargan administration, this was not an entirely unrealistic expectation. But the hostage
crisis made a rapprochement between the two countries impossible. U.S. policy towards Iran
effectively became one of “regime change,” which continues to this day.
25 Years of Tyranny
The roots of the hostage crisis can be found in the Shah’s dictatorship in the quarter century
leading up to the revolution. The U.S. government has propped up right-wing dictators and
criminal states all over the world. But the Shah was not just armed and supported by the U.S. He
had been installed into power by the U.S.
Prior to 1953, Iran had a vibrant parliamentary system. Shah (Farsi for King) Mohammad Reza
Pahlavi was a constitutional monarch with a ceremonial role. But in the early 1950s, a strong
communist-led movement arose demanding the nationalization of oil, which was being stolen by
the British Anglo-Persian Oil Company oil. It is said that Anglo-Persian paid more in taxes to the
British government than it paid Iran for the oil.
Following the election of nationalist Dr. Mohammad Mosaddegh as prime minister, the
government nationalized the oil. The British and the U.S. promptly imposed sanctions on Iran.
But Mosaddegh survived the crisis and shut down the British Embassy. Then, in the largest
operation of its kind to date, through operation Ajax, the CIA overthrew Mosaddegh and
installed the Shah as an absolute monarch.
From 1953 to the 1979 revolution, the Shah’s government ruthlessly repressed all opposition
forces, leftists, nationalists and Islamists. The Shah’s dreaded secret service, the SAVAK, trained
and equipped by the CIA and the Israeli Mossad, routinely used torture and execution of political
activists. Iran was a loyal client state for the U.S. And, of course, successive U.S. administrations
backed the Shah. Emblematic of this support was President Jimmy Carter traveling to Iran in
January 1978, toasting the Shah and calling Iran “an island of stability.”
Revolution in 1979
Over a year of mass protests and widespread strikes led to the overthrow of the client state. After
the Shah fled Iran, the U.S. embassy stayed open but the staff was drastically reduced from a
high of nearly 1,000 down to about 80. The embassy was much more than an office staffed by
civil servants simply processing paperwork and issuing visas. In fact, the U.S. embassy in Tehran
was effectively the command headquarters of the country, through which Washington issued its
dictates to the Shah. The Shah would not make any major decisions without Washington’s
approval. U.S. Ambassador William Sullivan writes about how, to the very end, the Shah was
still looking to him for answers on how to react to the revolution.
The Embassy Takeover
Days after the overthrow of the Shah, the U.S. embassy was occupied by the Fedayeen guerillas,
a Marxist group that had waged an armed struggle against the Shah. But the new government
intervened and gave the embassy back to U.S. officials within three hours.
On October. 22, 1979, the Shah traveled to the U.S., purportedly seeking medical treatment for
lymphoma. He had been offered medical services by Switzerland, but he preferred to live in the
U.S., where he must have felt safer under the protection of his longtime master. The Shah’s entry
into the U.S. angered the Iranian people, who rightly considered the U.S. responsible for the
Shah’s crimes.
On Nov. 4, a group of students that called themselves “Muslim Student Followers of Imam’s
line,” took over the U.S. Embassy. The group’s main demand was that the U.S. return the Shah
to Iran to stand trial for his crimes. The group’s other demands included an apology from the
U.S. government for the overthrow of Prime Minster Mosaddegh and the releasing of Iran’s
frozen assets in the U.S. The students’ initial objective was to gain worldwide publicity for its
protest, as stated by one of the organizers: "Announcing our objections from within the occupied
compound would carry our message to the world in a much more firm and effective way.” The
Carter administration’s response: “The United States will not yield to blackmail.”
The unwillingness of the Carter administration to offer even symbolic concessions, and
subsequent developments within Iran and internationally, turned what was planned to be a short
protest into an international crisis that was to last for over a year.
Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of Iran’s revolution, had no advance knowledge of the U.S.
embassy seizure plans. But, once the event took place, he soon embraced and supported it. The
takeover of the embassy and Khomeini’s support left the provisional government with little room
to maneuver. The government was not only opposed to the embassy takeover but in favor of
expanding relations with the West. Just days later, Bazargan’s government was forced to resign.
Shortly after the embassy takeover, the students released women and African American
personnel, citing solidarity with “oppressed minorities.” Another hostage, Richard Queen, was
released in 1980 due to health problems. The remaining 52 hostages remained in captivity for
444 days.
On April 24, 1980, the Carter administration attempted a rescue. But Operation Eagle Claw was
aborted after a helicopter crashed into a tanker aircraft in the middle of a sand storm in a desert
in Iran, killing eight service members. A second planned rescue attempt was never carried out.
The hostages were released into U.S. custody on Jan. 20, 1980, at the very same time that newly
elected U.S. President Ronald Reagan was being sworn into office. The timing of the release has
given rise to speculation that Reagan might have negotiated with Iranian officials. Gary Sick,
senior member of President Carter’s National Security Council, claims in his book, October
Surprise, that William Casey and possibly George H.W. Bush went to Paris on behalf of Reagan
to delay the release. Years later, the Iran-Contra Affair was a documented case of Reagan
negotiating in secret with the Islamic Republic of Iran to by-pass Congress to continue funding
the criminal Contras in Nicaragua. On the Iranian side, to this day, a key factor dividing the
different factions of government has been whether or not to try to re-establish relations with the
United States and how much concessions to give. Former president Rafsanjani and various
political forces associated with him, including former president Khatami and the current
president Rouhani, are for reaching a compromise with the U.S.
The Nuclear Negotiations
As the Obama administration is negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program, it is important to
understand that these are not negotiations between forces of equal strength. The negotiations are
about imperialist powers attempting to force their will on an oppressed country through the use
of economic sanctions and the threat of military action.
It is unclear whether an agreement will be reached. What is clear is that the terms offered Iran
are a reflection of imperialist foreign policy. With thousands of nuclear weapons of its own, the
U.S. and its allies are imposing severe restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program for suspicions that
it may one day have a military component.
The hostage crisis was the historic reaction of an oppressed nation to being forced to live under
the terror of a U.S. client for a quarter century. The same imperialist interests that motivated the
engineering of the 1953 CIA coup are motivating the drive to weaken or overthrow the Iranian
state today.
Download