EJ Habina Quantitative Anal. Lab MW 2:00 Experiment 7: Comparison of Unknowns: Weak Acid Identification Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to help us as students to better understand the workings of acid-base chemistry through a guided laboratory procedure. The lab will help us not only to understand how acids and bases react during a particular situation, but also how to derive the calculations and how to complete such reactions as well. Procedure: 1. Part 1 a. An unknown sample of weak acid was obtained. We know that weak acids are titrated by a strong base, as well as potassium acid phthalate (KHP) is a good primary standard to standardize the base. The amount of KHP required in order to react with all the moles of base was then calculated 2. Part 2 a. Three amounts of KHP are massed based on the calculations in part 1 and were each placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. To each flask approx. 50 mL of water is added and used to dissolve the amount of KHP for that sample. For each sample’s titration, NaOH was added slowly in 2 mL additions with pH readings taken at each increment. As the pH change began to become greater, the additions of base were lowered to 0.5 – 1 mL until the change in pH is minimal again. A spreadsheet and graphs of the data were created in order to determine the equivalence and half-equivalence points of each titration. 3. Part 3 a. Knowing that this weak acid – strong base titration and is a monoprotic system, the equivalence point data is used to determine the amount of acid present, or the pH. From the titrations in step 2 the pH corresponding to before any base is added, at the equivalence point, and at 1 mL past the equivalence point was calculated. 4. Part 6 a. After the questions in part 4 and part 5 were answered, the unknown weak acid was then titrated just as in part 2. A spreadsheet and graphs of the data were created in order to determine the equivalence and half-equivalence points of each titration. Data: Trial # 1 Trial # 2 Trial # 3 Average Mass of KHP (g) 0.6155 0.6061 0.6088 0.6101 1/2 Equivalence Point (mL) 14.1 14.65 14.73 14.49 Equivalence Point (mL) 28.2 29.3 29.45 28.98 Trial # 1: Trial # 2: Trial # 3: NaOH added (mL) pH NaOH added (mL) pH NaOH added (mL) pH 2 4.24 2 4.21 2 4.22 4 4.50 4 4.38 4 4.42 6 4.62 6 4.53 6 4.55 8 4.75 8 4.68 8 4.71 10 4.88 10 4.79 10 4.83 12 4.97 12 4.92 12 4.93 14 5.10 14 5.01 14 5.04 16 5.21 16 5.14 16 5.16 18 5.34 18 5.26 18 5.26 20 5.47 20 5.38 20 5.41 22 5.62 22 5.53 22 5.53 24 5.84 24 5.71 24 5.71 26 6.14 26 5.95 26 5.93 27 6.40 27 6.12 27 6.11 27.5 6.62 28 6.39 28 6.35 28 6.94 28.5 6.60 28.5 6.52 28.5 9.93 29 7.02 29 6.87 29 10.29 29.5 10.21 29.5 9.36 29.5 11.08 30 10.81 30 10.66 30 11.24 30.5 11.11 30.5 11.00 30.5 11.36 31 11.25 31 11.20 31 11.43 33 11.58 31.5 11.32 33 11.64 32 11.42 34 11.64 Trial #1: mL NaOH vs. pH 14 pH of solution 12 10 8 6 pH 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 mL NaOH Added Trial #2: mL NaOH vs. pH 14 pH of solution 12 10 8 6 pH 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 mL of NaOH Added Trial #3: mL NaOH vs. pH 14 pH of solution 12 10 8 6 pH 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 mL of NaOH Added Mass of Unknown (g) 1/2 Equivalence Point (mL) Equivalence Point (mL) Trial # 1 NaOH Added (mL) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 40.5 42.5 pH 1.66 1.79 1.96 2.09 2.23 2.36 2.48 2.59 2.71 2.81 2.93 3.04 3.16 3.32 3.46 3.65 3.95 4.20 4.35 4.60 5.22 10.12 10.63 10.83 10.99 11.11 11.20 11.33 11.49 Trial # 1 0.501 Trial # 2 0.5045 Trial # 3 0.5017 Average 0.5024 18.425 18.10 22.25 19.592 36.85 36.20 44.50 39.183 Trial # 2 NaOH Added (mL) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 33 33.5 34 34.5 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39.5 41.5 pH 1.83 1.98 2.17 2.34 2.47 2.60 2.73 2.83 2.95 3.04 3.14 3.24 3.35 3.47 3.60 3.84 3.99 4.09 4.19 4.31 4.58 4.80 5.62 10.31 10.74 10.95 11.07 11.17 11.33 11.53 Trial # 3 NaOH Added (mL) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 45 45.5 46 48 pH 1.66 1.85 2.04 2.29 2.48 2.63 2.77 2.91 2.96 3.03 3.09 3.16 3.21 3.25 3.32 3.42 3.53 3.63 3.79 3.95 4.26 5.50 10.57 10.77 10.91 11.29 pH of solution Trial #1: mL NaOH Added vs. pH 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 pH 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 mL NaOH Added Trial #2: mL NaOH Added vs. pH pH of solution 15 10 5 pH 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 mL NaOH Added Trial #3: mL NaOH Added vs. pH pH of solution 12 10 8 6 pH 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 mL NaOH Added pH 1 mL after Equivalence Point MW (g/mol) pKa Ka Trial # Before NaOH added At Equivalence Point 1 3.320 8.997 8.9995 135.96 2.73 1.86E-03 2 3.319 8.98 8.988 139.36 3 1.00E-03 3 3.318 8.98 8.992 113.9 3.18 6.60E-04 Average 3.319 8.986 8.993 129.74 2.97 1.17E-03 Calculations: Grams of KHP required for 30 mL of Titrant: 0.1 π ππππ» = 0.1 π 0.03 πΏ × = 0.003 πππππ ππππ» 1πΏ 1 πππππ ππππ = πππππ πππ π 0.003 πππππ πΎπ»π × pH: 204.2212 π = 0.6127 π πΎπ»π 1 ππππ Before adding NaOH: πππ π ππ πΎπ»π π’π ππ × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = πππππ πΎπ»π = πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π πππππ π»π − = π π»π− πππ‘ππ ππππ’ππ πΎπ = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [π»] [π»π − π₯] ππ» = −log[π»] Ex: 0.6155 π × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πππππ πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π 0.003013 πππππ π»π = 0.0603 π π»π− 0.050 πΏ 3.9 × 10−6 = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [π»] = 0.000483 π [0.0603 − π₯] ππ» = −log[0.000483] = 3.32 At the Equivalence Point πππ π ππ πΎπ»π π’π ππ × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = πππππ πΎπ»π = πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π πππππ π»π − = π π−2 πππ‘ππ ππππ’ππ πΎπ€ 10−14 πΎπ = = πΎπ 3.9 × 10−6 πΎπ = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [ππ»] [π−2 − π₯] πππ» = −log[ππ»] → 14 − πππ» = ππ» Ex: 0.6155 π × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π 0.003301 πππππ π»π − = 0.0385 π π−2 0.050 πΏ + 0.0282 πΏ πΎπ = πΎπ€ 10−14 = = 2.564 × 10−9 πΎπ 3.9 × 10−6 2.564 × 10−9 = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [ππ»] = 9.93 × 10−6 [0.0385 − π₯] πππ» = −log[9.93 × 10−6 ] → 14 − 5.003 = ππ» = 8.997 At 1 mL After Equivalence Point πππ π ππ πΎπ»π π’π ππ × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = πππππ πΎπ»π = πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π πππππ π»π − = π π−2 πππ‘ππ ππππ’ππ πΎπ = πΎπ€ 10−14 = πΎπ 3.9 × 10−6 πΎπ = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [ππ»] [π−2 − π₯] πππ» = −log[ππ»] → 14 − πππ» = ππ» Ex: 0.6155 π × 1 πππ πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πππππ πΎπ»π = 0.003013 πππππ π»π − 204.2212 π 0.003013 πππ π»π − = 0.03804 π π−2 0.05πΏ + 0.0282πΏ + 0.001πΏ πΎπ = πΎπ€ 10−14 = = 2.564 × 10−9 πΎπ 3.9 × 10−6 2.564 × 10−9 = [π₯ 2 ] → π₯ = [ππ»] = 9.88 × 10−6 [0.03804 − π₯] πππ» = −log[9.88 × 10−6 ] → 14 − 5.0005 = ππ» = 8.9995 How does the incomplete ionizing of weak acids effect the overall result when calculating both pH and concentration values? Since weak acids do not ionize completely, the concentrations of each species must be calculated using a ICE table. This is due to the fact that the acid is not completely disassociated and therefore any change in species is significant. Predict the shape of the curve when titrating a weak acid with a strong base The shape of the curve will be more gradual than that say with KHP. Not only will it be more gradual, but also the “jump” which will occur when it reaches equivalence will be much smaller. Molar Mass of Unknown: πΏ ππππ» πππππ ππ‘ πΈππ’ππ£. ππ‘. × π ππππ» = πππππ ππππ» Ex: πππ π π’πππππ€π = πππππ πππ π ππ ππππππ€π πππππ ππππ» 0.03685 πΏ × 0.1 π ππππ» = 0.003685 πππππ ππππ» 0.5010 π = 135.96 π/πππ 0.003685 Ka of Unknown: π΄π‘ βπππ πππ’ππ£ππππππ πππππ‘ ππΎπ = ππ» πΎπ = 10−πππ Ex: π΄π‘ βπππ πππ’ππ£ππππππ πππππ‘ ππΎπ = ππ» = 2.73 πΎπ = 10−πππ = 10−2.73 = 1.86 × 10−3 Identity of Unknown B: Possible identity: Salicylic Acid (4-Hydroxybenzoic Acid) Real Molar Mass: 138.12 g/mol Real pKa: 2.80 Conclusion: In this experimental procedure, the goal was to identify an unknown weak acid through titration by a strong base. After completing the procedure, one possible identity of Unknown B was found to be Salicylic Acid. Its actual molar mass of 138.12 g/mol as very close to the calculated molar mass, which was 135.96 g/mol. Also, the actual pKa value for salicylic acid of 2.80 is close to that of the calculate value, which was 2.73. Overall, the proximity of the actual values for salicylic acid to that of the calculated values makes this the most probably identity of the unknown sample.