A BIAS AND SENSITIVITY REVIEW OF WASHINGTON STATE’S DRAFT HEALTH AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION STANDARDS All students will learn concepts and develop lifelong skills that protect and promote health and avoid or reduce health risks. August 31, 2015 Submitted to: OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Old Capitol Building Olympia, WA 98504-7200 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 2 Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 Background and Justifications ........................................................................................ 4 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................... 5 Hypothesis....................................................................................................................... 5 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 5 Bias and Sensitivity Review Process.................................................................................... 7 Select Reviewers ............................................................................................................. 7 Train Reviewers............................................................................................................... 8 Perform Review............................................................................................................... 9 Results and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 11 Physical Education ........................................................................................................ 11 Content ..................................................................................................................... 11 Implementation ........................................................................................................ 19 Health Education........................................................................................................... 21 Content ..................................................................................................................... 21 Implementation ........................................................................................................ 29 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................... 34 Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the bias and sensitivity review of the revised draft for health and physical education learning standards for the State of Washington. Engaging in a bias and sensitivity review is an important step in the development and adoption of new education standards and outcomes. Two groups of educators with significant diversity experience reviewed and provided feedback on the draft physical education and health education standards. They: Provided advice on global information to include in the front matter of the standards document; Reviewed the standards and outcomes in detail, and provided feedback on the language used, with the intent to reduce potential bias and improve cultural sensitivity; and Supplied guidance related to the successful rollout and implementation of the standards. Under current Washington State law (RCW 28A.655.070), OSPI has the responsibility to develop and maintain Washington’s academic learning standards consistent with the goals outlined in the Basic Education Act, RCW 28A.150.210. This includes periodic review and possible revision of the standards. Prior to adopting state learning standards in any subject area, OSPI’s process includes several key components that include reviewing and vetting the draft standards with key statewide stakeholder groups, conducting comparisons of previous state learning standards with the revised standards, and conducting a bias and sensitivity process to gather recommendations for implementing the standards in a culturally sensitive and bias-free manner. These steps are conducted prior to adoption to allow OSPI and other statewide partners involved with developing transition and implementation plans and resources to gather specific recommendations on critical issues related to implementing the new standards. Over the course of the past year, a workgroup of 13 educators involved in statewide health and fitness education efforts gathered to consider the need for revising the Washington State K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards (2008). The revision process is in collaboration with the Healthiest Next Generation Initiative, OSPI Health and Physical Education, and OSPI HIV and Sexual Health Education. The workgroup agreed to adopt both the National Physical Education Standards and the National Health Education Standards, yet revise the grade-level outcomes (what students should know and be able to do) to reflect the established specificity and rigor established in the 2008 Washington State K - 12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 2 The workgroup developed learning outcomes that infuse the strengths of both state and national documents. The revisions include creating one document with two distinct categories: Health Education (including Core Ideas: Wellness, Nutrition, Sexual Health, Safety, Social Emotional Health, and Substance Use and Abuse) and Physical Education. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 3 BACKGROUND The Health and Physical Education Program and the HIV and Sexual Health Education Program, in collaboration with the Healthiest Next Generation Program at the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), convened a workgroup to discuss the need for and implications of a Washington State K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards revision process. The workgroup examined multiple state and national resources to determine the need for revising Washington’s K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards (HFS). The overall learning standards revision process workflow is shown below. Start Review and compare Federal and State standards Should WA revise standards? Yes Seek initial input from stakeholder groups Draft new standards Feedback received? Engage Bias & Sensitivity reviewers to provide feedback No Yes No End Implement new standards Yes Approved by Superintendent? Revise based on feedback Yes Feedback received? No Prepare final version for approval by Superintendent No Yes No Feedback received? Prepare final draft standards for public comment Figure 1. Overall process flow to revise health and fitness learning standards. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATIONS After careful review and comparison of the new national standards with the Washington State K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards, the workgroup agreed on the following actions and recommendations: Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 4 Washington State’s K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards need to be revised in light of: o Release of the 2008 National Health Education Standards (NHE); o Release of the 2012 National Sexuality Education Standards (NSE); o Release of the 2014 National Physical Education Standards (NPE); o Adoption of the ELA and Mathematics Common Core State Standards, 2011; o Adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards, 2013; and o Release of Washington’s 2012 Early Learning and Development Guidelines. The taxonomy of some NPE student outcomes are out of sequence from kindergarten through twelfth grade. NHE standards do not include assessable grade-level outcomes. Current state standards do not include student learning expectations for sexual health although HIV and STD prevention education is required in grades 5-12 (RCW 28A.230.070). PROBLEM STATEMENT Washington State students do not receive consistent access to evidence-based and evidence-informed physical and health education including sexual health education, thereby presenting inequities in K-12 learning environments and increasing the probability of health disparities statewide. HYPOTHESIS The development, adoption and delivery of evidence-based and evidenced-informed health and physical education standards will serve to decrease health disparities, minimize inequities in the K-12 learning environment, and improve overall academic success by increasing performance, attendance and graduation rates. RECOMMENDATIONS Revise physical education and health standards using strengths from the NPE, NHE and NSE Standard sets combined with existing Washington State K-12 Health and Fitness Learning Standards and other state models. Create one document with two distinct categories: o Health Education o Physical Education. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 5 Maintain standards and structure from NPE but modify outcomes to: o Bring into alignment with Washington State laws; o Specify student learning expectations; and o Align vertically across grades. Maintain standards from NHE but modify structure to match NPE. Write health outcomes to be consistent with format of physical education outcomes. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 6 BIAS AND SENSITIVITY REVIEW PROCESS SELECT REVIEWERS In May 2015, OSPI reached out to districts across the state and several organizations1 and individuals from around the state who have participated in similar reviews or who had significant experience with elements of diversity and cultural sensitivity. OSPI invited districts and organizations to nominate individuals, and for individuals to apply for one or both of the planned bias and sensitivity reviews: either the physical education standards and/or the health education standards. It was not necessary for applicants to have content experience in health or physical education, instead, the central focus was on experience working with diverse groups and traditionally underserved students. Participants were asked to provide an overview of their experiences and knowledge that shaped their ability to be a valuable contributor to the Health and Physical Education Learning Standards Bias and Sensitivity Committee. Applications were evaluated using four core criteria shown in Figure 2. Academic Qualifications Experience with Diverse Groups Content Knowledge Leadership Figure 2. Evaluation criteria for the bias and sensitivity review committee. OSPI received 18 completed applications from highly-qualified candidates. Ten applicants were selected for physical education, and eleven for health education. There was a small overlap between the groups, but most applicants contributed one day to the review process. 1 Outreach was targeted to the Educational Opportunity Gap Oversight and Accountability Committee, special education, migrant/bilingual education, student support division, SHAPE WA, and previous bias and sensitivity reviewers for other content areas. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 7 TRAIN REVIEWERS At the beginning of each of the sessions, the review teams spent about two hours engaging in group-directed norming and training regarding building awareness of issues of bias in language and implementation of learning standards. As shown in Figure 3 below, the group first reviewed the structure and language of the learning standards – either physical or health education depending upon the day. Then, the group identified potential elements of bias and what cultural factors might be necessary to consider when contemplating the health and physical education draft standards. See Table 1 for a list of the screening filters used by the committee members when reviewing the draft language. The group invested some time identifying theoretical ways that the language of the learning standards could contain bias or cultural insensitivity. The purpose of this theoretical exercise was to identify both extreme and nuanced ways that language could introduce bias into the learning environment. Finally the review team discussed how the standards and outcomes could be implemented in a bias-free manner. The review team engaged in small and large group discussion to ensure that individuals were clear about the work to be done. Figure 3. Training plan for the bias and sensitivity review team. The Equity and Civil Rights office at OSPI has developed guidelines for reviewing educational materials and learning standards as shown in Table 1. The review team used the Washington Models for the Evaluation of Bias Content in Instructional Materials as a basis for the health and physical education bias and sensitivity review. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 8 Table 1. Guidelines for identifying bias, from the Equity and Civil Rights office at OSPI. A Bias Review should consider at least the following elements Gender Race Ethnicity Sexual Orientation Religion Socio-economic Status Gender Expression & Identity Physical Disability Age Family Structure Native Language Occupation Body Shape/Size Culture Geographic Setting PERFORM REVIEW The goals of each of the day-long sessions for both physical and health education were: Understand the benefits of engaging in a bias and sensitivity review prior to adoption of a set of standards. Engage in group-directed training regarding reviewing materials for bias and sensitivity. Review the draft language of the proposed health or physical education standards and outcomes and identify potential language that could be construed as biased or culturally insensitive. Identify bias-free and culturally sensitive implementation strategies to help ensure successful release and adoption of the health and physical education standards and outcomes. Working in small groups, the review teams first examined the draft language in assigned sections of the learning standards. Using the criteria identified in Table 1, the small groups examined the language of the standards and the outcomes. For both health and physical education, there were a few instances where the small groups recommended alternative language. They took care to ensure that their recommendations did not alter the intent or the rigor of the standard or outcome, but rather improved the language by increasing cultural sensitivity or eliminating potential bias. More information can be found in the Results and Recommendations section later in the document. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 9 For the most part, the reviewers determined that the language of the standards and outcomes for both physical education and health education was innocuous and did not contain content that could be construed as biased or culturally insensitive. The reviewers provided suggestions for revised language, definitions, or front matter descriptions when their recommendations warranted further explanation. The reviewers then switched their attention to providing recommendations about the implementation of the new standards. They examined three core areas: advice to include in the front matter for the standards document for educators as they are teaching health and physical education, big ideas about implementing the standards or core ideas, and finally, focused recommendations for specific outcomes as necessary. Most of the guidance regarding implementation involved important philosophical messages to be included in the front matter of the standards document and through future professional development. Detailed information can be found in the Results and Recommendations section below. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 10 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PHYSICAL EDUCATION CONTENT The review team examined the draft standards and outcomes. In some instances, their feedback is specific to a particular outcome, but in the vast majority of cases, the feedback is more universal, and applies to similar outcomes and examples across the entire standards document. While the intent of the language review was to address language issues, in some instances the review team identified implementation recommendations related to the outcome content. Figure 4. Sample page from draft physical education standards, showing the structural organization of the standards and the outcomes. The draft Physical Education Standards are shown below. Each standard has multiple skill types and sub-types, as shown in Figure 4. The standards revision workgroup created specific grade-level outcomes for the standards and skill types. 1. Demonstrates competency in a variety of motor skills and movement patterns. 2. Applies knowledge of concepts, principles, strategies, and tactics related to movement performance. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 11 3. Demonstrates the knowledge and skills to achieve and maintain a healthenhancing level of physical activity and fitness. 4. Exhibits responsible personal and social behavior that respects self and others. 5. Recognizes the value of physical activity for health, enjoyment, challenge, selfexpression, and/or social interaction. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 12 Standard Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level 1 Motor Skills 5 Create and perform a routine using complex rhythmic combinations. Consider changing “perform” to demonstrate. Allow students to demonstrate their skill in a variety of ways, e.g. tapping feet, clapping, using tools or instruments. In some cultures and religions, dancing is prohibited. 1 Foot Dribble 3 Demonstrate mature pattern while foot-dribbling at a slow to moderate jogging speed. Sometimes, outcomes like this could be difficult to evaluate objectively. Consider growth of individual instead of comparing peers to one another. 1 Forehand and Backhand 5 Apply forehand and backhand strikes using weight transfer and correct timing with a short- or long-handled implement with power and accuracy with competency in modified game play. Consider the use of “strike,” and possibly replace with “contact.” “Strike” is commonly used throughout the physical education standards. It may have unpleasant triggers for students who have experienced physical abuse. Alternatively, consider taking the opportunity to address striking others, versus striking a ball with an implement, and that it is never okay to hit someone else. 1 Defensive Skills 6 Demonstrate defensive-ready position, with weight on balls of feet, arms extended, and eyes on midsection of the offensive player. Students may feel uncomfortable having eyes directed at their midsection or directing their eyes at particular parts of other students’ bodies. 1 Games and Sports HS Y2 Refine activity-specific movement skills in two or more games/sports (e.g., invasion games, net/wall games, field/striking, target games). Consider replacing “invasion” with “strategy.” “Invasion” may have unpleasant triggers for students who have experienced physical or sexual abuse. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Page 13 Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level 1 Outdoor Pursuits HS Y2 Refine activity-specific movement skills in two or more outdoor pursuits (e.g., biking, hiking, geocaching/orienteering, rock climbing, fly fishing). Sometimes the examples listed in the outcomes are limiting for students without access to these extracurricular activities. Consider removing examples or balancing activities for rural/urban and socioeconomic status. Also explain in the front matter for all “e.g.” examples, that these are not “must teach” activities but suggestions to reach the outcome. In general, examples should take into consideration diverse populations. 2 Movement and Rhythms 6 Apply force to successfully perform movement activities (e.g., dance, gymnastics, kickboxing, swimming, weight training, rowing, yoga). Be aware that most of these example activities could potentially conflict with cultural values. Some students may not be able to engage in dancing. Gymnastics and swimming might be problematic based on dress and skin exposure. Yoga might be an uncomfortable practice for people in some religions. Kickboxing and other direct contact sports might not be advised in some situations. In general, educators must know and understand their students when planning activities, and ensure that students who need to opt out of a particular activity have an alternate practice they can perform to demonstrate their mastery of the outcome. 3 Benefit of Physical Activity All Recognize active and inactive behaviors. Be aware that students with physical limitations may feel excluded from this set of outcomes. Consider linking to adaptive physical education standards. Consider coteaching with special education teacher or consulting with Standard Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Page 14 Standard Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale same to select appropriate access outcomes for all students. 3 Nutrition All Identify healthy and unhealthy foods. 4 Personal Responsibility All Demonstrate responsible Address equity and disparities in enforcement of behavior in a variety of physical responsible behavior. Ensure that students and educators activity environments. have a broad cultural perspective on what responsible behavior is. Recognize cultural differences regarding respectful listening, responding and behavior. 4 Personal Responsibility 7 Exhibit responsible social behaviors by cooperating with classmates, demonstrating inclusive behaviors, and supporting classmates. This is a nice definition of responsible behavior, consider including a variation of this in the glossary. 4 Personal Responsibility HS Y1 Demonstrate intrinsic motivation by selecting opportunities to participate in physical activity inside and outside of class. Consider “selecting or planning,” depending upon what is possible, given the context and range of opportunities. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Cultural differences may exist between what is healthy and unhealthy. Socioeconomic and geographic factors may contribute to access to healthy foods. Be sensitive to cultural and economic differences. As an example, recommending organic produce may represent a position of privilege, and may be far from the reality of some students. Consider a cultural inventory by asking students “what does healthy mean to you? What does unhealthy mean?” Page 15 Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level 4 Personal Responsibility HS Y2 4 Rules and Etiquette K 4 Rules and Etiquette HS Y2 4 Receive and Provide Feedback 4 4 Standard Recommendation & Rationale Analyze and overcome barriers that prevent opportunities for physical activity inside and outside of school (e.g., time management). Are these personal or social/contextual barriers? Understand and discuss what types of barriers kids have control to address. Recognize class protocols. Define etiquette in the glossary. Consider using “rules” instead of protocols. Examine moral and ethical conduct in specific competitive situations (e.g., fair play, performance-enhancing substances, gambling). Implementation: encourage and embrace differences without calling out the difference in a negative way. Teacher should know student and parents well before highlighting a difference to be sensitive. All All The review team didn’t understand why peer interaction was called out in grade 2 and not in K-1. In some instances “appropriately” and “respectfully” were used to describe responding to feedback. There is no specific recommendation here, just an observation. Receive and Provide Feedback 6 Provide corrective feedback to Grade 6 seems more advanced than Grade 7. a peer using teacher-generated rubric with appropriate tone and other communications skills. Work with Others All All Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Encourage and embrace differences without calling out the differences in a negative way. Teachers should know Page 16 Standard Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale students and parents well before highlighting differences. Be sensitive to gender and cultural issues regarding working with others and sharing space. 4 Work with Others 4 Demonstrate conflict resolution using avoidance strategies. Consider reframing to use the school district’s specific model for conflict resolution. For example, a school may emphasize proactive behaviors over avoidance strategies. 4 Work with Others HS Y2 Assume a leadership role in a physical activity setting (e.g., group leader, referee, coach). Is this realistic for all kids? Perhaps consider personal leadership. 4 Work with Others HS Y2 Describe the importance of How is dignity and respect defined? Ensure there is room treating individuals with dignity for cultural variation. and respect during physical activity. 4 Safety 1 Demonstrate following Is this developmentally realistic for a first grade student to directions for safe participation manage safe participation without reminders? All the time? and proper use of equipment At least once? without reminders. 4 Safety HS Demonstrate best practice for participating safely in physical activity and exercise (e.g., injury prevention, proper body alignment, hydration, use of equipment, implementation of rules, sun protection). Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report This has little to do with a bias and sensitivity review, but consider “UV protection” rather than “sun protection.” Page 17 Standard Skill Type/ Sub Type Grade Outcome Level 5 Challenge 4 Understand that challenging physical activities require consistent practice to become proficient. “Proficient” may need to be defined in the glossary. It varies depending upon the student’s developmental level and physical abilities. Consider tying it to an individual increase in skill level, rather than a specific measure. 5 Challenge 6 Recognize individual challenges in a physical activity and cope in a positive way (e.g., extending effort, asking for help or feedback, modifying the tasks). Consider alternative for “cope,” including “respond” or “manage.” Recognize that asking for help or feedback is an important life skill, not a weakness or downfall. Engage in discussions around gender and culture regarding asking for help or feedback. 5 Social Interaction 5 Compare social interactions when engaged in partner, small-group, and large-group physical activities. Think about differences in cultural norms when engaging in partner, small-group and large-group physical activities. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Page 18 IMPLEMENTATION The physical education review team identified positive messages to highlight in the front matter or introductory sections of the new health and physical education standards document, related to cultural sensitivity. Successful schools have significant family and community engagement. Physical education students benefit from being actively involved with their families and the community. Teachers are encouraged to think outside the gymnasium when it comes to physical exercise – participating with an elder or an elementary buddy in a community activity can meet some of the outcomes in the standards. A growth mindset is particularly effective in reaching mastery and making positive improvements. Identifying and encouraging improvement in the skills and outcomes shown in the physical education standards document is important to help students build lifelong habits of mind and body. Teachers are encouraged to continue to build their own awareness around culture to enhance their students’ opportunities in physical education. In addition, when teachers collaboratively reach out to others with experience with English language learners, special education, and positive behavior systems specialists to name a few, they are more effective reaching all their students and making a meaningful difference in their lives. There are several common areas within physical education where improved cultural awareness offers a significant benefit. Dress codes, interactions between boys and girls, and values of competition versus collaboration are examples of areas where increased cultural understanding creates more opportunities for inclusion and success for all students. When implementing the new physical education standards across the state, the review team offered the following recommendations to help build positive momentum and maximize success: Create a short video highlighting physical activity and the new standards by showing students in various roles, body types, races, gender, ages and activities. Focus more on a broad range of activities, rather than just athletics and organized sports. Show how the physical education standards connect with other disciplines like mathematics, science and English language arts. Identify cultural specialists around the state who can provide support to health educators to implement the standards in a bias-free manner in their classrooms, Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 19 schools and districts. Provide targeted development opportunities for school boards and administrators to educate them about the new standards. Utilize the educational service districts to coordinate and deliver training in their regions/areas. Embed cultural awareness in the implementation of professional development opportunities. Make every effort to ensure that teachers from all around the state have access to these professional development opportunities as they are implementing the new standards. Reach out broadly to other stakeholder groups, like special education, Title I coordinators, and parent/teacher associations to build awareness and support for the rollout of the new standards. Create a “wow” by tying in existing statewide work on the Healthiest Next Generation and other similar initiatives, including potentially involving the Governor in a kickoff event. Engage existing resources who are knowledgeable about effective implementation science to design a rollout process. Consider scaling up with best practices by using cohorts to test and disseminate best practices. Our state’s Teacher/Principal Evaluation Program (TPEP) is designed to use an instructional framework to offer a detailed and helpful description of what effective teaching looks like. Districts should tie in their selected instructional framework when rolling out the physical education standards to ensure an effective and cohesive teaching and learning environment. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 20 HEALTH EDUCATION CONTENT Like the physical education review team, the health education review team examined the language of the draft health education standards for bias or cultural insensitivity. In most cases, the feedback shown below is more universal in nature and applies to similar outcomes and examples across the entire health education standards document. They also identified implementation recommendations in some instances when they were reviewing the language related to specific outcomes. Wellness Safety Nutrition Sexual Health Social Emotional Health Substance Use and Abuse Figure 5. Health Education Core Ideas. Figure 6. Sample page from draft health education standards, showing the structural organization of the standards and the outcomes. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 21 Grade Outcome Level Core Idea Topic Wellness Analyzing Influences All Analyze how family, peers, media, culture, and technology influence health decisions and behaviors. Realize that discussions around influence will involve values. Educators can engage with students about personal, family, cultural and universal values, but should have a solid foundation of cultural awareness first. Safety Injury Prevention All Identify safety hazards in the home. Consider changing “home” to “where you live or stay.” Some students may be more transient and might not have a place they call “home.” Safety Injury Prevention K-2 Explain potential dangers of weapons. Be aware that different cultures and environments have different perspectives on weapons. Discuss and identify weapons and tools, and appropriate use. Safety Violence Prevention 3 Differentiate between gang, clique and club. Consider “Differentiate between healthy and unhealthy group characteristics.” The boundaries between group types are permeable, and definitions are too often tied to race, gender and other individual characteristics. Safety Violence Prevention 5 Describe ways to prevent, reduce, and avoid violent situations. Consider adding “if possible” to the end of the outcome. Sometimes, it is not possible to avoid violent situations. Safety Violence Prevention 6 Demonstrate ways to resolve conflict to prevent, reduce and avoid violence. Consider an alternative phrasing: “Demonstrate ways to resolve conflict that could prevent, reduce or avoid/resolve violence.” Again, in some instances, it might not be possible for a student to avoid a violent situation, like at home. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Page 22 Core Idea Topic Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale Safety Violence Prevention 8 Analyze effects of violence on individuals, families and communities. Consider “Analyze causes and effects of violence….” Understanding the root causes of violence may help reduce future violence. Safety Violence Prevention 8 Differentiate between passive, aggressive, and assertive communication. Pay attention to culture and gender differences in defining these types of communication. Safety Violence Prevention 8 Explain how bystanders can help prevent, reduce, and avoid violence. Also note that bystander action or inaction can sometimes inappropriately escalate violence as well. Nutrition Nutritional Planning 5 Analyze how community, peers, media, technology, and culture influence decisionmaking related to food choices and eating behaviors. Also address socio-economic and geographic factors related to food choices. Nutrition Food Groups and Nutrients All Evaluate resources for Consider an outcome on analyzing influences related to accessing valid and reliable government food programs and systems. health information, products, and services for healthy eating. Sexual Health Anatomy and Physiology All Identify proper names for body Take care with using male and female identifications parts, including external male exclusively. Gender identity may need to be introduced and female anatomy. and addressed concurrently and age-appropriately. Consider using the phrase “medically accurate” instead of “proper.” Good use of the term sexual anatomy versus Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 23 Core Idea Topic Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale reproductive anatomy, because not all people will use their reproductive capacity during their lifetime. Sexual Health Anatomy, Reproduction and Pregnancy 7 Describe the stages of a pregnancy from conception to birth. Consider “fertilization” rather than conception because it is more specific and medically accurate. Sexual Health Anatomy, Reproduction and Pregnancy 8 Identify physical, emotional, and social consequences of sexual activity. Consider “effects” or “outcomes” instead of “consequences,” which might be too value-laden. Sexual Health Anatomy, Reproduction and Pregnancy HS Explain the role hormones play Consider “…hormones and other external influences in sexual behavior and decision play….” This would be an excellent place to tie in other making. core ideas like substance use and abuse and social emotional health. Sexual Health Anatomy, Reproduction and Pregnancy HS Describe the emotional, social, Consider including discussions of being a young parent in physical and financial effects of addition to a teen parent when teaching this outcome. being a teen parent. Sexual Health Anatomy, Reproduction and Pregnancy HS Describe behaviors that impact Consider “…impact sexual and/or reproductive health.” reproductive health. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 24 Core Idea Topic Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale Sexual Health Growth and Development 4 Recognize puberty and physical development can vary considerably. This might be a good place to tie in some science lessons on environmental toxins and their impact on development and early puberty. Sexual Health Reproduction 5 Understand puberty prepares the body for reproduction. Consider “potential reproduction.” Sexual Health Identity 5 Describe how media, society, Consider “…regarding sex, gender roles, identify and and culture can influence ideas expression.” regarding gender roles, identity, and expression. Sexual Health Identity 5 Identify trusted adults who students can ask questions about gender identity and sexual orientation. Consider expanding to include both trusted adults and resources. Sexual Health Identity 6 Understand the range of gender roles across cultures. Consider including expression and identity in addition to gender roles. Sexual Health Identity HS Evaluate how culture, media Consider “…culture, media, governments, society and and other people influence our other people influence….” perceptions of gender roles, sexuality, relationships, and sexual orientation. Sexual Health Healthy Relationships All Describe characteristics of healthy friendships and other relationships. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Be aware that the terms “healthy” and “positive” may describe a range of attributes, rather than a very specific definition or ideal. Page 25 Core Idea Sexual Health Topic Grade Outcome Level Recommendation & Rationale Healthy Relationships All Recognize people have the right to refuse giving or receiving unsafe touch. Consider adding a new outcome about saying no and taking no for an answer related to unsafe or unwanted touch. Social Emotional Health Self-Esteem 1 Compare and contrast positive and negative self-talk. When teaching this outcome, be aware of both cultural variations and the impact of trauma on self-esteem. Social Emotional Health Body Image 4&5 Understand influences of family, culture, and media on body image. The grades 4 & 5 outcomes may need to be switched to be developmentally aligned. Describe influences of family, culture, and media on body image. Social Emotional Health Body Image and Eating Disorders HS Explain why people with eating Be careful to not introduce bias into “professional” support disorders need professional services, and understand that a range of services and support services. supports may be appropriate. Access to professional services may be limited, depending upon the person’s situation. Social Emotional Health Expressing Emotions All Describe appropriate ways to express emotions. Be aware that cultural, gender roles and family values and other factors may influence what is “appropriate.” Take care when defining “appropriate” to include awareness of cultural and other differences. Social Emotional Health Intimidation and Bullying 8 Understand connection between bullying and suicide. Consider “Understand connection between bullying and suicide, self-harm and other destructive behaviors.” Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 26 Grade Outcome Level Core Idea Topic Social Emotional Health Mental Illness and Disorders All Various. Substance Use and Abuse Use and Abuse K Recognize differences between Medicines can be harmful too. Perhaps consider “other” medicines and harmful drugs. versus harmful, or explain that medicines taken incorrectly can be harmful as well. Substance Use and Abuse Use and Abuse 1 Understand tobacco and alcohol are harmful drugs. Consider “Understand tobacco and alcohol can be harmful drugs.” Some age-appropriate social, cultural or religious uses may not be harmful. Substance Use and Abuse Use and Abuse 2 Understand commonly used street names for tobacco and alcohol. Use the word “terms” not “street names.” Street name could be considered pejorative. Substance Use and Abuse Use and Abuse 7 Distinguish between substance It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between these use, misuse, abuse, stages. Check the most current research to understand dependency, and addiction. how professionals are using this language. Substance Use and Abuse Prevention 1 Understand importance of The review group wondered if this is at the right level. It avoiding tobacco, second-hand could be awkward for a 1st grade student in a home where smoke, and alcohol. adults smoke, for example. Is this too concrete for 1st grade? Substance Use and Abuse Effects 6 Understand short- and longterm effects of substance abuse on physical health. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Suicide is addressed in several outcomes. Consider including self-harm in some of the outcomes as appropriate. Consider changing to “physical and mental health.” Page 27 Grade Outcome Level Core Idea Topic Substance Use and Abuse Effects 7 Explain short- and long-term effects of substance abuse on dimensions of health. Consider changing to “Explain short- and long-term effects of substance misuse or abuse on dimensions of health.” This is a global concern wherever “abuse” is used. Misuse should be included, because of the high incidence rate of misuse and the potential for harm. Substance Use and Abuse Treatment 8 Investigate local services for those affected by substance abuse. Consider “Investigate local and regional services….” Rural students and communities may not have local services available, or there may be other reasons for not using local services. Also, pay attention to who defines “valid and reliable” substance abuse services, and “professional” treatment. Some well-advertised treatment services have poor outcomes and are not based on current best practices. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Recommendation & Rationale Page 28 IMPLEMENTATION The health education review team identified several philosophical themes that should be addressed in the introductory sections or front matter of the health education standards document. Key themes include the following: More than just about any other subject, health involves the whole student and encompasses their physical, emotional, cultural, social, spiritual and economic well-being. There are many opportunities to advance cultural awareness, and many potential stumbling blocks when teaching health education. Educators and districts must understand the students and families they are serving and be aware of cultural factors within their schools. Health educators must be culturally proficient and must teach the whole child in an effective and inclusive manner. Some aspects of health education bring up topics that may be uncomfortable for some students given their personal situations, and the sensitive educator must be prepared to provide universal support for all students. Our students and families are very diverse across our state, and we must be inclusive regarding definitions of family and supportive of all family types. We must encourage awareness and sensitivity to local cultural and social influences and at the same time broaden our students’ perspectives on the wide range of values in a 21st century world. We must be aware that choice is often determined by or influenced by access. For example, if a student’s family does not have ready access to certain foods, it may make some lessons on nutrition virtually irrelevant for that student. Further, words like healthy and unhealthy may have fluid definitions based upon culture, socioeconomic status, and other factors. Educators, like all others, have individual values and biases. Building selfawareness helps educators identify their own perspectives and helps them present a broader perspective to their students rather than just their own personal views. No matter how culturally proficient an educator is, there is always room for continuous learning. A perspective of cultural humility and continuous learning is a positive model for teachers to use in their classrooms. The core ideas in health education are interrelated. Educators must become knowledgeable about the standards as a whole before trying to deliver content. No health behavior occurs in a vacuum, and there are upstream and downstream causes and effects of health behavior choices and constraints. More than any other class, health and physical education have long term benefits for Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 29 improving physical, mental and emotional health, engaging in healthy behaviors and relationships, raising healthy children and creating safe environments. In health education, it is important to meet students where they are at. Ensure a welcoming and open environment for all cultures, body sizes, orientations and physical abilities. Health class may be the place where students become aware of their gender and sexual orientation identities and it is imperative that we show respect to all students and expect respect among all students. Students in health classes are masters at asking difficult questions. Health educators must be empowered to answer their questions and be given skills to help address those challenging questions. Professional development for educators needs to involve more than understanding the concepts and the curriculum. Health educators need to understand cultural issues, racism, power, bias, sexism and other factors to effectively teach these topics. For example, understanding issues faced by a transgender person is an important part of the teacher’s professional development. When implementing the new health education standards across the state, the review team offered the following recommendations to help build positive momentum and maximize success: Pay attention to class size for health education classes. Smaller classes help facilitate discussion and dialog. When rolling out the new standards, offer professional development opportunities related to cultural awareness, bias and privilege. Engage teacher preparation programs around the state to help new teachers understand the 2015 standards. Tie in the adoption of the new standards with other national and statewide initiatives related to physical activity and health, including the Healthiest Next Generation, 5210, Let’s Move and other similar campaigns. Develop a website repository of information and tools designed to help teachers implement the new standards, including sample lesson plans, effective teaching strategies, resources, and practical advice. Include information about how the standards support Washington State law regarding health education, and professional development and technical assistance resources. Reach out through existing channels like the Washington State School Directors Association annual conference to educate key stakeholder groups about the work being done and how they can support implementation of the new standards. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 30 The health education review team provided more specific implementation advice on a subset of the core ideas. SOCIAL EMOTIONAL HEALTH When discussing causes of stress, it is important to cover minority or chronic stress. For example, a gay student who has direct or indirect exposure to harmful or bullying language likely experiences minority or chronic stress. Causes of stress can include personal, family, social and cultural factors. For example, if a person is experiencing internal conflict in any of those areas, it may add to the person’s stress burden. Perseverance, resilience, courage, and endurance—collectively called “grit”; are critical success factors for achievement of goals. They play an important role in social emotional health. When discussing language use, address in-group versus out-of-group language and how some words used in a homogenous group are inappropriate when used by out-of-group members. When addressing bullying, harassment, and intimidation, discuss why people bully and why it is harmful. Schools that develop positive behavior intervention systems and create a culture of non-bullying may have better outcomes related to reduction of bullying behavior. Resources for addressing bullying might exist outside of school. When discussing self-esteem, help students understand and develop confidence, self-awareness, and self-love. When teaching about body image and eating disorders, recognize that both males and females can have eating disorders. Because eating disorders and poor body image can develop over time, make sure to scaffold lessons across grades. When teaching about expressing emotions, emphasize that people have a range of emotional responses that have been influenced by culture, family, and society. Emotions are not good or bad per se. When teaching about mental illness and disorders, realize that a range of experiences exist. Look at how cultural and social values impact views about mental health, services and access to services. Teachers should be aware of culturally relevant services in their communities. When considering professional services, be aware of potential bias about who gets referrals to professional services, and be aware of the potential for quality variation in professional services. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 31 SUBSTANCE USE AND ABUSE Ceremonial use of drugs and alcohol are not necessarily harmful. An example might be use of wine in a Catholic mass. Social use of drugs and alcohol might not be harmful, if used responsibly. Evaluate messages of harm involving use of substances. All or nothing messages may be far less effective than a more moderated approach. As an example, propagating a message that all people who smoke will die may make children fearful for family members who smoke. Additionally, exaggerated messages of harm may have the consequence of shutting down relationships with family members. Take the opportunity to increase cultural awareness by teaching about cultural use, ceremonial use and differences in culture. Review and use most current language in place of “substance abuse.” See substance abuse disorder in DSM-5, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version 5. Addiction and dependency are difficult to differentiate. SAFETY Students have limited control over their worlds. If lots of violence is happening around them, their ability to navigate and negotiate situations might be difficult. Avoid setting the expectation that they have the power to control all situations, especially at home. Their range of options may be more limited. Consider adding outcomes related to information security, identity theft, cyber bullying, and cyber hacking. Students need to understand how to operate safely in a digital environment. Violence prevention has many connections to other core ideas, including healthy relationships, sexual health, and social-emotional health. Defining violence is very political. Disproportionate discipline is a form of violence. Similar situations may be labeled “boys will be boys” or could lead to prosecution and incarceration depending upon race and other factors. Harassment, intimidation and bullying, when directed based on immutable conditions, is discrimination and has serious impacts and legal consequences. Violence does not always emerge from an inability to manage conflict or poor communications skills. Sometimes it comes from differential access to power, control and resources. Convey idea of upstream and downstream causes and consequences. An event doesn’t just start with a punch to the face. Stuff happens before and after. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 32 Address the systems, history, endemic racism and other factors that impacted the situation. Address restorative justice as a resolution strategy. Kids can’t learn when they are experiencing trauma. Health educators may become aware of adverse childhood events disclosed by some of their students and must be sensitive to the situation and be aware of mandatory reporting requirements. SEXUAL HEALTH Realize that many topics in sexual health are complicated, and need to be taught multiple times at age appropriate levels. Consider adding a track to Healthy Relationships to talk about breaking up with a person, and healthy ways to give and receive this information and manage the after-effects of a relationship ending. Pornography is not addressed in the current outcomes. Consider adding an outcome related to how pornography can impact sexual health, safety and social emotional health. Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 33 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are indebted to the volunteers who thoughtfully assisted in conducting the 2015 Health and Physical Education Standards Bias and Sensitivity Review Process. Participants worked very hard to review the language in the standards and outcomes for potential bias, and to identify successful strategies to reach all students and engage their interest in health and physical education. They devoted many hours out of their busy schedules to do this work. We are grateful for their efforts. Name Position/Organization Amanda Winters Research Manager, Cardea Services Ann Renker Office of Student and School Success Leadership Coach, OSPI Brett Niessen Training Manager, Cardea Services Brian Smith Assistant Executive Director, WA Interscholastic Activities Association Damarys Espinoza Enlace Project Coordinator, WA State Department of Health Judith Mosby Oakville School District Principal Lauri Turkovsky PREP Grant Coordinator, WA State Department of Health Lisa Love Health Education Manager, Seattle Public Schools Mallory Sullivan Program Supervisor, Equity & Civil Rights, OSPI Michelle Morse East King Community Outreach Educator/Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and Hawaiian Islands Robert Hand Family and Consumer Sciences Teacher , Mt. Vernon High School Serene Cook Assessment, and Professional Learning Coordinator Contractor, Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Shirley Siloi Outreach & Recruitment Specialist, Tacoma Community College Sue Anderson Executive, Statewide Pioneering Healthier Communities, YMCA Teddy McGlynn-Wright Training, Collaboration and Program Integrity Manager, Seattle Youth Violence Prevention Initiative Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 34 Thomas Romero Program Supervisor, Migrant and Bilingual Education through 6/30/15 , OSPI Tracy Mikesell Family Planning Program, WA State Department of Health Tracy Wilking Health Services Consultant III, WA State Department of Health Health and Physical Education Bias & Sensitivity Review Report Page 35