jssc4672-sup-0001-SuppMat

advertisement
Solid phase purification and extraction for the determination of
trace neonicotinoid pesticides in tea infusion
Minglu Zhang,a,b Hongping Chen,a,c Li Zhu, a,c Chuanpi Wang, a,c Guicen Ma *a,cand
Xin Liu *a,c
a
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou
China .
b
c
Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Key Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety & Risk Assessment, Ministry of
Agriculture, Hangzhou, China
E-mail: mgc1314@tricaas.com; liuxin@tricaas.com.
Phone: +86-571-8665-1650, Fax: +86-571-8665-2004
Address: Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 9
Meiling South Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310008, China
Supporting Information
1 Synthesis
1.1 Synthesis of SBA-15-NH2
Amino functionalized SBA-15 (SBA-15-NH2) was synthesized according to
our previous study [1]. Typically, 1.6 g (0.32 mmol) of EO20PO70EO20 (P123)
and 2.2 g KCl were dissolved in 60 g of 2.0 M HCl at 40 oC. To this solution,
4.2 g (20mmol) of TEOS was added under vigorous stirring. The final
molar-composition of the reactants is 0.02P123/1.5KCl/6 HCl/166 H2O/1TEOS.
After stirring for 10 min, the mixture was kept in static conditions at the same
temperature for one day, and then the mixture was transferred into an autoclave
and heat at 140 oC for another 24 h. The solid product were collected by
filtration and dried at 60 oC in air. The obtained samples were calcined at 350 oC
before used. For the synthesis of SBA-15-NH2, 0.01mol aminopropyltrimethoxysilane and 3.0 g SBA-15 were added to 60 mL toluene, the mixture
was stirred at 110 oC for 12 h, and then the solid was collected by filtration and
dried at 60 oC in air.
1.2 Synthesis and characterization of GO
GO was synthesized according to a modified Hummers method [2]. Typically,
graphite powder (3.0 g), NaNO3 (1.5 g) and 98% H2SO4 (69 mL) were mixed
into a 500 mL three-neck flask, KMnO4 (9.0 g) was added slowly to the mixture
in constant stirring under the ice bath to controlled the reaction temperature
below 5 oC. Then, the solution was stirred for 2 h under 35 oC, and was
transferred to the ice bath again. 138 mL of deionized water was gradually
added to the mixture. Afterwards, the solution was heated in an oil bath at 96 oC
for 30 min, additional deionized water (100 mL) and 30% H 2O2 (3 mL) were
added. Finally, the resulting mixture was washed repeatedly with deionized
water until the pH was 7, and graphene oxide was obtained after vacuum
drying.
2 Adsorption Test
2.1 Crude tea infusion purification with SBA-15-NH2
Dried tea leaves were brewed as follows: 3.0 grams of dried green tea leaves
were weighed into a 250 mL flakes and 100 mL of boiled water were added.
After 10 min of brewing, the hot aqueous extract was cooled and filtered.
Different amounts of SBA-15-NH2 (0, 20, 50,100 mg) were added into 10 mL
crude tea infusion. The mixture was shaken for 30 min and centrifuged. The
supernatant was collected as tea infusion for further used.
2.2 Calculation of adsorption capacity.
Different amount of GO powder (50-200mg) was added into the tea infusion
solution (obtained from 2.1. section) with a concentration of pesticide at 0.1 mg
L-1. The mixture was shaken for 10 min and centrifuged at 12000 rpm. Then 1
mL of the supernatant was filtered through 0.22 μm PTFE and 3.0 μL was
injected into the UPLC-MS/MS system for analysis. The adsorption capacities
of target pesticides toward GO were evaluated according to the following
equation (eq 1).
Adsorption capacity % = (Co-Ct)/C0×100%
(eq 1)
Co and Ct are the concentrations of pesticides before and after adsorption,
respectively.
2.3 Adsorption kinetics.
The adsorption kinetics curves of pesticides on GO were studied as the
following operation process: 1.5g of GO was added into 100 mL of tea infusion
with pesticide (Co = 0.1 mg L-1). Then the mixture was stirring at ambient
temperature. Samplings (1.0 mL) were done in specific time intervals (from 0
to 60 min) after the addition of GO. The samples were centrifuged and the
concentration of the target pesticides in the supernatants was determined by
UPLC-MS/MS.
In order to reveal the mechanism of the adsorption process and evaluate the
adsorption performance of GO, pseudo-first-order (eq 2) and pseudo-second
-order (eq 3) kinetics models were applied to fit the experimental data.
In (Qe − Qt) = ln Qe − k1t
(eq. 2)
t
1
t
=
2 +
Qt
k2Qe
Qe
(eq. 3)
V
Q = (Co-Ce) × M
(eq. 4)
Here, Q represents the adsorption amount of the pesticide on GO which was
calculated by equation 4. Where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium
concentration of pesticide. M is the weight of GO (mg) and V (mL) is the
volume of tea infusion. Qe and Qt (mg g-1) are the adsorption amount of
pesticide on GO at equilibrium and at any time t respectively. k 1 (min-1) and k2
(g mg-1 min-1) are the rate constants of the pseudo-first-order and
pseudo-second-order models, respectively.
2.4 Adsorption isotherm.
Tea infusion (10 mL) with different concentrations of target pesticides
(Co= 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.4 and 0.5mg L-1) were contacted with GO (100 mg) in
conical flasks. The flasks were continually stirring for 30 min under ambient
temperature. Then, the concentrations of pesticides in the solutions were
analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS.
In order to describe the adsorption mechanism, we attempted to fit Langmuir
(eq 5) and Freundlich (eq 6) isothermal models to the obtained data. The
equations are shown as:
Ce
Qe
Ce
= Q
m
+
1
KLQm
1
In Qe = n InCe + InkF
(eq. 5)
(eq. 6)
Where Qm is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg g-1) and KL is the
Langmuir constant related to the adsorption energy (mL mg -1). KF reflects the
adsorption capacity of an adsorbent ((mg g-1)(L mg-1)1/n). The parameter n
represents the adsorption affinity of the adsorbent for an adsorbate. Ce and Qe
are the same as described above.
Table S1. Parameters for pesticide residue analysis by UPLC-MS/MS.
Pesticide
Retention
Q1 Mass (m/z)
Q3 Mass (m/z)
time (min)
Thiamethoxam
Imidacloprid
Acetamiprid
Imidaclothiz
4.7
5.4
5.9
5.7
Declustering
Collision
potential (DP)
energy (V)
292.1
211.2
31
18
292.1
181.2
32
29
256.1
209.1
34
22
256.1
175.1
36
22
223.1
126.1
42
27
223.1
56.1
41
25
262.1
181.1
30
20
262.1
131.9
32
27
Table S2. The kinetics parameters for the adsorption of pesticides on GO.
Pesudo-second-order
Pesticides
k2 (g mg-1
Qe (mg g-1)
r2
rel error(%)
min-1)
Thiamethoxam
0.2827
0.00566
0.9996
3.85
Imidacloprid
0.2560
0.00588
0.9993
3.52
Acetamiprid
0.2365
0.00541
0.9988
5.46
Imidaclothiz
0.1203
0.00549
0.9977
7.65
Table S3. The isothermal parameters for the adsorption of pesticides on GO.
KF((mg g-1)(L
Isotherm
Freundlich
Pesticides
mg-1)1/n)
1/n
r2
Thiamethoxam
0.1336
0.8496
0.9952
Imidacloprid
0.1810
0.8116
0.9771
Acetamiprid
0.1378
0.8101
0.9916
Imidaclothiz
0.0908
0.7618
0.9804
Table S4 The results of pesticide residues determined in real samples (mg L-1)
Sample ID
Thiamethoxam
Imidacloprid
Acetamiprid
Imidaclothiz
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0043a
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: ND=non detection.
a The imidacloprid concentration of 100 mL tea infusion brewing from 3 g dried tea is 0.0043 mg
L-1. We suppose that the transfer rate is 100% for imidacloprid, the concentration in made tea of
imidacloprid is 0.14 mg/kg.
Figure S1. Effect of amount of SBA-15-NH2 on the adsorption capacity of GA, C, EGCG
and ECG from crude tea infusion.
Figure S2. The adsorption isothermals of neonicotinoids on GO at 25 oC.
Figure S3. Comparison of the recovery rates of GO, activated carbon, GCB, rGO and raw
graphite.
Reference
[1] Ma G. C., Zhang J. Y., Chen L. Y., Liu T., Yu L. Z., Liu X., Lu C. Y., Rsc Adv. 2014,
4 ,41341-41347.
[2] Hummers W. S., Offeman R. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80,1339-1339.
Download