Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 1 of 13 TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION SUBJECT: Research Grants and Funding of Investigator Initiated Sponsored Research I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this document is to describe the procedures and policy followed by Terumo Medical Corporation (TMC) as it pertains to research grants for Investigator Initiated Sponsored Research (IISR). II. BACKGROUND: Companies of medical products may choose to fund unsolicited external research endeavors solely for the purpose of advancing science and/or clinical practice. This is done via research grants for Investigator – Sponsored Studies (ISS). Decisions for support are made independently of the commercial area of input. III. SCOPE: This procedure applies to all grants of unsolicited external research funded by TMC. This is open to qualified investigators from the United States (U.S.) and all countries who wish to receive support for conduct of their own research. No grant may be made to any individual or entity identified on, or associated with any organization or known individual identified on, the Specially Designated National List of the U.S. Treasury Dept.; the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General's Exclusion Database; the FDA's debarment list; or the GSA list of debarred persons. Those investigators who plan to conduct investigational device exemption (IDE) studies must submit the appropriate FDA application(s) and conduct the study per the Code of Federal Regulations 812, respectively; TMC is not responsible for writing, submitting, or conducting the IDE research study of interest IV. ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES: 1.0 Sponsor or Investigator-Sponsor – The Sponsor, also referred to as the Investigator-Sponsor in an Investigator-Sponsored Study, is responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial or study. The Sponsor is also responsible and liable for the initiation and limitation of the clinical investigation per FDA 21 CFR 812 and ISO 14155. 2.0 Grant Review Committee – The Grant Review Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving any investigator proposal submitted to TMC and any subsequent research grant provided for Investigator- Sponsored research. The Committee evaluates the scientific merit and various aspects of each proposal to ensure that all research funding is distributed and used appropriately throughout the conduct of the trial. They are responsible for CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 2 of 13 establishing procedures and selection criteria for determination of such review and approval. The Grant Review Committee must maintain complete files for all research grant requests, approvals, and activities. 3.0 V. Director of Clinical Affairs – The Director of Clinical Affairs, or designee, is responsible for the maintenance and oversight of the IISR program at TMC. Such responsibility includes: research proposal submission and review, website or paper submission management, facilitation of Grant Review Committee’s review and evaluation of all proposals, facilitation of contracts, tracking of study timelines and deliverables, and oversight of milestone payments in accordance with the IISR contract. DEFINITIONS: See Investigational Study Procedure (CA004) for a list of definitions. VI. REFERENCES: See Investigational Study Procedure (CA004) for a list of reference documents. VII. SAFETY: No safety issues need to be addressed. VIII. PROCEDURES: 1.0 Summary 1.1 Mission The mission of TMC is to support Investigator-Initiated or sponsored research studies to advance medical and scientific knowledge which may generate promising interventions. 1.2 Eligibility Types of research that are eligible for support based on TMC’s mission are as follows: 1.3 Clinical studies of approved and unapproved uses, including approved or unapproved TMC devices Observational studies where the primary focus is the scientific understanding of a disease Other types of independent research on disease states where TMC has professional interest Types of Support Offered CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 3 of 13 TMC may provide funding in the form of monetary support or any combination thereof, as a research grant. TMC will provide a letter of reference, submitted by an Investigator – Sponsor with an IDE application that allows the FDA to reference proprietary information on file with FDA. TMC will not disclose proprietary information, such as manufacturing details, and device verification/validation testing, directly to an Investigator – Sponsor. (Note: Monetary or product donations may not be provided as a substitute for a research grant. All research grants for investigator initiated studies shall be administered in strict compliance with the procedure set forth in this policy). 1.4 Research Grants Offering of research grants should be limited to the support of bona fide, commercially-reasonable and scientifically-warranted research endeavors. These research grants do not pertain to grants to organizations such as the American Heart Association or similar, but rather, to individuals or institutions (such as hospitals), to fund specific projects. 1.5 Research Grant Restrictions 1.5.1.1 All research grant applications, including the protocol and budget, must be reviewed and approved by TMC’s Grant Review Committee. 1.5.1.2 There must be no condition linking, either directly or indirectly, the research funding with the research institution’s purchase of products or services from TMC (unless the purchase of products or service is for the conduct of that research). 1.5.1.3 The research funding must be unrelated to past, present, or future sales of TMC products or services to the research institution or investigator. 1.5.1.4 The amount of the grant must be reasonable in the context of the work to be performed within the research study and must not exceed the proposed budget. 1.5.1.5 The purpose of the study must not be to educate a physician or institution on the use of TMC products. 1.5.1.6 No grant may be made to any individual or institution/entity identified on, or associated with, any organization or known CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 4 of 13 individual identified on, the Specially Designated National List of the U.S. Treasury Dept.; the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General’s Exclusion Database; the FDA’s debarment list; or the GSA list of debarred persons. 1.5.1.6.1 No grant may be offered for support of ongoing clinical programs that are part of an organization’s routine operations. 1.5.1.6.2 No grant may be used as start-up funds to establish new clinical or research programs or to expand existing programs. 1.5.1.6.3 No grant may be used to purchase capital equipment unrelated to the study or that would generate revenue. 1.5.1.6.4 No grant may be used for construction funds to build new facilities. 1.5.1.6.5 No grant may be used for hiring staff that are not dedicated to the study. 1.5.1.6.6 TMC cannot fund an IISR that will run in conjunction with a TMC sponsored study. 1.6 Investigator – Sponsor Responsibilities Unlike Terumo – Sponsored studies, investigator – initiated studies are completely managed by an Investigator – Sponsor. The Investigator-Sponsor will independently manage and perform all work required for the study (i.e., concept and design, protocol, data collection, conducting the statistical analysis and publishing the study). TMC personnel must adhere to the following requirements to avoid inadvertent qualification as the Study Sponsor: 1.6.1 TMC personnel may not approach an Investigator with a request to conduct the study. However, TMC can engage in discussions or publish its interest in funding specific categories of research. 1.6.2 TMC personnel cannot write the protocol or pay to have it written by a third party for the investigator. 1.6.3 TMC personnel may not provide the Sponsor-Investigator with documents for use in the conduct of the study (i.e., protocol, CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 5 of 13 informed consent form, etc), except those that relate to the investigational device itself that are needed to obtain regulatory (e.g., IDE) or IRB approval. 1.6.4 TMC personnel cannot advise the study site(s) on the conduct of the study. 1.6.5 TMC personnel cannot require the Sponsor-Investigator to use a particular vendor or service provider (e.g., Contract Research Organization (CRO), etc.). 1.6.6 TMC personnel cannot provide functions that are typically performed by a Sponsor, such as monitoring, build a database, data management, report writing, auditing, etc. 1.6.7 TMC personnel may provide device training or in-servicing to the Sponsor-Investigator and associated personnel. 1.6.8 TMC personnel may explain relevant regulatory requirements to the Sponsor-Investigator. 1.7 Submission, Review, and Approval Process 1.7.1 Submission 1.7.1.1 Method Research proposals can be submitted either as a single page idea/concept or a fully developed protocol. If an idea/concept is submitted and TMC is interested in supporting the proposal, the Investigator – Sponsor will be asked to submit a full proposal including but not limited to a full protocol, detailed budget and informed consent. An investigator or institution may submit a research grant proposal to TMC either through an established TMC IISR website or, in the absence of website availability, via paper. Either method should make available proposal and budget forms by which the investigator can complete all the necessary information for the proposal’s consideration. 1.7.1.2 Single Page Concept A request form for the research concept submission (see Short form, Attachment 1) is completed by the CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 6 of 13 Investigator – Sponsor. The purpose of the form is to collect sufficient information about the proposed study: 1.7.1.3 Investigator name or Entity conducting study Contact information Amount requested Study Concept, brief description of patient population and method to measure outcome(s) The Curriculum Vitae of the Investigator – Sponsor Relevance to Terumo's products or the rationale for funding if not relevant Full Protocol Submission A protocol is significantly more detailed and well developed. The Investigator – Sponsor may initially submit a full protocol proposal or upon notification from Terumo that the concept merits submission of a protocol (see Full Research Proposal form, Attachment 3). A complete protocol and comprehensive line item study budget must be submitted. The study budget must be inclusive of all costs, including any start – up costs, salary support for all personnel, patient costs, laboratory fees, monies for publications, presentations, overhead, and associated travel and any other requirements. The following is required at the time of a full protocol submission: A fully developed and well written protocol describing the research in detail The draft informed consent The Curriculum Vitae of the principal investigator and other key researchers A copy of the IRB approval letter with the title of the research proposal (if available and required) A detailed line item budget for the research proposal CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 7 of 13 1.7.1.4 Tracking An appropriate tracking system for paper or electronic records should allow: Submission and tracking of proposals Forwarding of proposals to the appropriate parties for review Determination of whether all required elements for a proposal are present before accepting a submission Logging of all proposals including approval status (approved or declined) 1.7.2 Receipt, Proposal Preparation, Review and Approval 1.7.2.1 Receipt TMC will acknowledge receipt of grant proposal submissions by email to the submitter. Then proposals should then be forwarded to the appropriate TMC personnel for review. 1.7.2.2 Funding Availability The Director of Clinical Affairs or designee will initiate the RINGI process, put the request in the standard format and circulate for approval among appropriate parties to secure funding. 1.7.2.3 Grant Review Committee packet After receipt of a research proposal a Grant Review Committee packet is prepared by Clinical Affairs. A Concept proposal packet includes: A completed concept proposal form Updated and signed Sponsor-Investigator CV Sponsor-Investigator debarment search results Documentation of funding availability Any other study related materials (i.e. protocol synopsis, etc), if available A Full Research Proposal packet includes: CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 8 of 13 A completed full research proposal form Fully developed protocol and informed consent (if applicable) Line item budget Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (if obtained) Study timeline Sponsor-Investigator debarment search results Documentation of funding availability Any other study related materials (i.e., case report forms, etc), if available References (if applicable) If a proposal is determined to meet the submission requirements, Clinical Affairs will forward to the Grant Review Committee for formal presentation. 1.7.2.4 Composition of Grant Review Committee The following cross-functional team members will be responsible for review of the proposal: 1.7.2.5 Director of Clinical Affairs Director of Regulatory Affairs Legal Representative Vice-President (VP) of Human Resources Corporate Compliance Officer Grant Review Committee Meeting Each request will be carefully reviewed for scientific merit, alignment with TMC’s objectives, appropriateness of the study design for the stated objective, whether unnecessary patient risks are involved, whether there is a risk of unsubstantiated claims that could be made with the study data, identifying possible operational risks in study execution, fair market value, expertise of the investigator, and whether the proposal adheres to TMC’s IISR requirements. The Grant Review Committee receives review materials electronically. A face to face meeting or teleconference may be held, if necessary. CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 9 of 13 1.7.3 Approval Process 1.7.3.1 Approval The proposal is considered approved if the majority of members are in favor of approval. Upon approval, the research approval form is completed, signatures collected and filed in the study records. 1.7.3.2 Disproval If the decision from the Grant Review Committee is not to proceed, the Clinical Affairs Director shall communicate the decision to the Investigator. 1.7.3.3 Timing The Grant Review Committee process evaluation period is approximately 4 weeks. 1.8 Award and Compensation 1.8.1 Conditions of Approval If the TMC Grant Review Committee has reviewed the study proposal packet and approves of the study, the following conditions must still be met for the study to be conducted: 1.9 The investigator and/or investigator’s institution (if applicable) and TMC agree to the conditions under an Investigator-Sponsored research contract. Regulatory bodies and Institutional Review Board (IRB), as applicable, approve the investigator’s protocol and informed consent. Notification of Approval Upon approval of the proposal by the Grant Review Committee, the Director of Clinical Affairs or designee will inform the Investigator/Institution in writing that the approval has been granted and a IISR contract will be sent to initiate the process. 1.10 Financial Management and Study Oversight CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 10 of 13 1.10.1 Clinical Study Agreements and Financial Disclosure 1.10.1.1 For all approved IISR research grants, the Director of Clinical Affairs or designee should request financial disclosures from the Investigator including their W-9 form and tax identification numbers. 1.10.1.2 The Director of Clinical Affairs or designee will send the IISR agreement template with applicable study milestones, projected study target dates, budget and payment schedule to the Investigator for review. A typical milestone and payout schedule is as follows: Contract execution (10% study budget) IRB approval (10% study budget) First subject enrolled (15% study budget) 50% subjects enrolled (15% study budget) Last subject enrolled (15% study budget) Follow up complete (10% study budget) Final publication or Final report (25% budget) 1.10.1.3 If the investigator – sponsor or Institution proposes any changes to the contract template, the altered agreement must be reviewed by TMC’s legal representative. 1.10.1.4 Once the agreement wording is finalized, two original copies of the agreement are generated for signature by the Investigator – Sponsor. 1.10.1.5 Once the signed agreement is received back from the Investigator, the agreement is routed to the Division President for signature. 1.10.1.6 Once the fully executed agreement is completed, one contract original is sent to the Investigator with their first milestone payment (according to the payment schedule in the contract) and the other is maintained in the Clinical Affairs files. 1.10.2 Study Payments 1.10.2.1 TMC requires the Investigator – Sponsor to submit a payment request via an invoice per the payment schedule contained in the IISR agreement. It is the responsibility of the Director of Clinical Affairs or designee to ensure study milestones and target dates are met and appropriately documented. CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 11 of 13 1.10.2.2 Investigators will be held to the deliverables and timelines outlined in the contract. TMC is not obligated to continue a study that is not meeting contractually held deliverables and milestones. 1.11 Maintenance and Updates 1.11.1.1 Throughout the IISR study, the Director of Clinical Affairs or designee will obtain updates from the Investigator to track study progress against the agreed milestones in the agreement. TMC requires at least one study status update every quarter. Updates are expected to contain information on enrollment (if applicable), projected publications, and study completion dates. TMC also requires notification of any amendments to the original protocol after the study has commenced. 1.11.2 Study Closure, Clinical Trial Data, and Publications 1.11.2.1 At the conclusion of the study, TMC expects to have a publication result from the research, which can be in the form of an abstract, a peer – reviewed journal publication or a scientific society meeting presentation. The Investigator – Sponsor will comply with recognized ethical standards concerning publications and authorship including the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, www.icmje.org, established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 1.11.2.2 To ensure the ability to publish study results, the Investigator – Sponsor must register the clinical trial protocol information onto www.clinicaltrials.gov. prior to enrolling the first patient. 1.11.2.3 In cases when a manuscript is not developed, then the complete study report must contain, at minimum, a description of the following details: Introduction Rationale for the study Study Objectives Study Design Study Endpoints (primary and secondary) CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 12 of 13 Study Population Treatments Administered and Assignment to groups (if applicable) Study Procedures/Methods (including disposition of subjects) Efficacy and Safety Variables Statistical Methods Disposition of patients and protocol deviations Results (including adverse events and complications) Safety Evaluations Discussion and overall conclusion Tables, figures, graphs, references and appendices as appropriate 1.11.2.4 TMC has the right to review any IISR presentation or publication material according to the InvestigatorSponsored Study Agreement but no formal company review is required. Any publication or presentation material related to the IISR study shall be informally reviewed by the Director of Clinical Affairs, at a minimum. 1.11.2.5 Generally, the timeframe for obtaining a final deliverable (publication or report) should be within 6 to 9 months after study completion. 1.11.2.6 Upon study closure, the investigator will be required to certify that the study was conducted and the TMC grant was used solely to conduct or report the study and that all safety reporting obligations were met. 1.12 Records 1.12.1 Any documents pertaining to IISR protocol submission, review, management, publication, investigator communications, etc., shall be saved and secured in Clinical Affairs. IX. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: This procedure does not apply to funding of continuing medical education or bona fide charitable missions. CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use. Document No.: CA024 Revision No. 1 Page 13 of 13 X. FLOW CHART CA24: PROCESS FLOW CHART INVESTIGATOR-SPONSOR CA ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF CA TMC REVIEW COMMITTEE START Study Proposal Short vs. Full Form NO Short Form Part A (K5906) Submission Complete YES 5 Business Days to Review YES Questions NO Short Form Part B (K5907) Full Form (K5904) NO Submission Complete YES Prepare Packet for GRC Proposal Review YES Questions NO Notify InvestigatorSponsor END Research Agreement Study Conduct Study Completion Data Analysis Publication Study Closure Final Payment Notify InvestigatorSponsor Proposal Denied Decision Proposal Approved Tracking/ Payments CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT COPY It is the responsibility of the associate using this document to assure that it is the current revision at the time of use.