Recenze p*ísp*vku do Sborníku v*deckých prací V*B-TU

advertisement

Editorial Board of the Transactions of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series

Faculty of Civil Engineering, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava

Ludvíka Podéště 1875/17, 708 33 Ostrava – Poruba, Czech Republic

Please answer all questions (use the checkboxes in the right part of the table). You can write more details on a second page of the review. Minor mistakes and and formatting errors can be marked directly in the paper DOC file. The review should be returned by e-mail to the marketa.maluchova@vsb.cz.

Transactions of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series

Paper Review

Paper title:

Author:

1. Overall evaluation of the paper base on its originality, its descriptiveness and its scientific quality and on its formal quality (language, images): a) paper can be accepted as is or with minor changes b) substantial changes are required

2. Does the paper include an original research work of the authors?

3. Is the paper title correct and descriptive?

yes

yes

yes

yes

4. It the abstract informative and does it include brief characteristic of the text? (according to the ISO 214 technical standard)

5. Are all images needed and are they print-ready?

Are modifications or additions of images required?

6.

Are the calculations in the paper correct?

(please randomly select a calculation)

yes no

yes

yes

yes

not applicable

7. It the used terminology correct and understandable?

8. Do author cite all necessary sources

(especially from the journals indexed in Web of

Science and Scopus)?

yes

yes

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

9. Are all listed references also used in the paper?

10. Are all the references complete? If possible, please verify if they are compatible with the ISO 690 technical standard.

11. Are all quantities and units consistent with the International System of Units (SI) and with the ISO/ IEC 80000 (if applicable)?

yes

yes

yes

no

no

no

Note: All notes related to the questions 1. - 11. can be included in the summary on the next page.

Summary (the review is not valid without the summary) :

Reviewer name:

Affiliation and address:



Signature and date

Download