CFN: Peer Review Submission Template
Summary Details
Name of reviewer
Are you happy for your name to be
disclosed to the author?
Does any conflict of interest exist with
you and this author/topic?
Name of author[s]
Name of editor[s]
CFN Region
Title of submission
Content type
Simon Laing
yes
Michael Kim
Johann
NCEL
BPPV
Podcast
Submission length appropriate
Yes
no
Technical/Stylistic Review
If you select ‘no’ for this section please provide some explanatory text to explain
your reasoning.
Do the presenter[s] clearly introduce
themselves and the their topic
Is the medium appropriate for delivery of
content/message
Is the sound quality robust
Is the delivery engaging and entertaining
Are additional images/resources
smoothly embedded
Is presenter’s tone consistent and
appropriate
If an interview is it logically sequenced
Any general comments about technical
and stylistic components
Yes (but needs further blog introduction)
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
A very good informative video
Educational/Academic Review
If you select ‘no’ for this section please provide some explanatory text to explain
your reasoning.
Is the submission mapped to the relevant
curriculum code[s]
If the ‘off the map’ code has been
selected is this appropriate
Is the abstract or show notes appropriate
Is the clinical information up to date
If included are guidelines relevant and
up to date
No – no mapping seen
no
Yes
NA
Are references and supporting material
appropriate
Are references and supporting material
presented in a consistent format
Does the submission raise any ethical
issues
Does the submission raise any issues
around confidentiality
NA
NA
No
No
General Comments
The video is great and definitely provides sound instruction on an area that can be
poorly understood. Presenter seemed very knowledgeable on the area and
presented the session in a very confident, well paced and educational manner.
The topic however needs framing, I would suggest by embedding the video in a
blog that talks about the topic, differentials, management and follow up. Without
this the it will look a bit random when released onto the website
Needs curriculum mapping
Recommendation
Ready for (scheduled) release
Ready for release when suggested edits
have been made and secondary review
is conducted
Not recommended for review
No
Yes
NA