CHEP – Mission Survey Results
CHEP – Mission Survey Results
Responder
001
002
003
004
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does the
mission statement listed above
reflect what you think CHEP ought
to be?
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
improve is vague and
who is this being
provided to?
Yes, we need more
organizations to
promote "networking"
among healthcare
groups (and other
organizations in
general)
I agree that
collaboration can
improve research,
health and
healthcare
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
mission statement?
to improve and
promote research,
healthcare, and
wellness throughout
Indiana.
Collaboration is great.
But is there a certain
goal to be achieved
once collaboration is
established? Improving
healthcare, health and
research in what
sense? I do like the
mission statement, but
perhaps its a bit broad.
Maybe we could
specify a little more.
I might want to
reorder to read:
Promoting
collaboration among
community partners
throughout Indiana
to improve
One challenge cited
during the training
was converting
research into
practical, applicable
tools. I think the
mission captures this
well.
I am happy with the
current message.
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
greatest positive
impact
Yes
Yes
The focus of CHEP
should be using
research to positively
impact health status.
Yes
Yes
......so that research
has an optimal
positive impact on
Hoosier health.
Yes
For research to be
helpful to
practitioners, it
needs to address
questions, concerns
of providers and
consumers.
Yes
evaluation is an
important endeavor
Coordination of
effort and
collaboration are
critical for successful
grant applications.
AND vital to
successful projects.
Grant writing is a
competitive process
and this helps assure
attractive proposals
and meaningful
outcomes
measurement.
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
change to reform
policy
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Do you think that a statement such
as this is necessary to convey the
non-duplicative nature of CHEP?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
Yes
Yes
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
approach statement?
Are there any additional comments
about the mission, aims, or
approach or anything else that you
would like to make?
If needed, may we contact you to
follow-up on your responses?
effective
communication of
research findings is
needed to improve
health care and
inform policy
Research is most
meaningful when it
can be applied.
To reduce health
disparities by helping
stakeholders
translate research
findings into
evidence based
practice and
evidence based
policy.
Yes
I would re-order to
state: . . . improve
healthcare, reduce
disparities and
inform policy."
CHEP will want to
attract some of the
same people who
are involved in other
coalitions. This give
them a reason to
participate.
I think this statement
reinforces the idea
that we do not want
to reinvent the
wheel. Promote
what we have; build
upon it.
Yes
........and
organizations, CHEP
strives to align and
develop a statewide
coalition.....
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Responder
005
006
007
008
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does the
mission statement listed above
reflect what you think CHEP ought
to be?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
It think the statement
hits the 3 areas
research(academia),
health (public health)
and healthcare
(medical models) that
are important for
improving the health
of the entire
population.
I think the message
that was conveyed at
the Mar 20 meeting
was one of
collaboration to
improve healthcare
so the mission is
succinct and broad
enough to develop
measurable
outcomes.
Sounds appropriate
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
mission statement?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
might move
"research" to the
end. Might say
"collaboration with
Indiana's
communities . . ."
Yes
I might replace
"health" with "public
health" to make it
more clear what
"health" pertains to.
Yes
yes, since I remember
that CHEP is about
bringing research
findings to population
efforts.
Describes what was
discussed at the first
meeting.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Do you think that a statement such
as this is necessary to convey the
non-duplicative nature of CHEP?
None
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes, since I remember
discussion around
having resources
housed in a more
central location.
Yes
Describes the
concept of what was
discussed at the first
meeting.
None
Yes
perhaps
"communicate and
apply"?
No
Yes
Yes
yes, since I remember
discussion around this
point also.
None
Yes
Yes
Same as above.
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
approach statement?
Are there any additional comments
about the mission, aims, or
approach or anything else that you
would like to make?
If needed, may we contact you to
follow-up on your responses?
It helps to clarify
everyone's role in the
process and prevents
other groups from
feeling "threatened"
by the presence of
CHEP which will be
helpful in creating
collaboration.
None
This statement
makes it clear that
support not
competition is the
focus of CHEP.
None
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Responder
009
010
011
012
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does the
mission statement listed above
reflect what you think CHEP ought
to be?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
Appropriate length
and description
Yes, I believe the
mission statement is a
proper reflection of
CHEP. However, it also
seems that CHEP has a
greater focus on
research than what is
implied in this mission.
It is brief yet clearly
describes the
mission.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
mission statement?
None
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
Yes
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
One suggestions is to
expand on the
'improve research
piece', such as:
Promoting
collaboration among
community partners
throughout Indiana to
develop, conduct, and
interpret research to
improve health and
healthcare.
Yes
Yes
This aim is important
because it emphasizes
having an ultimate
impact on Hoosier
Health.
Yes
Is in line with the
mission.
No Suggestions
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
Rigorous evaluation is
lacking in many public
health programs and
could definitely be
enhanced to help
spread successful
programs/policies and
improve unsuccessful
programs/policies.
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
No Suggestions
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Do you think that a statement such
as this is necessary to convey the
non-duplicative nature of CHEP?
Yes
Yes
It is in line with the
mission.
Yes
This aim is important
because it stresses the
communication of
research findings
beyond the academic
community.
Yes
It is in line with the
mission.
No Suggestions
No
Yes
No
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
Self evident
Many existing
coalitions may believe
they are already
working towards the
mission/aims within
their coalition. I think
the approach
statement clarifies the
intent to create a
statewide coalition
that supports and
enhances their
individual work.
No Suggestions
I think it would be
good to develop a
CHEP Project
Development Team
Yes
No
Responder
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does the
mission statement listed above
reflect what you think CHEP ought
to be?
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
approach statement?
Are there any additional comments
about the mission, aims, or
approach or anything else that you
would like to make?
If needed, may we contact you to
follow-up on your responses?
CHEP has a different
mission than the
other coalitions and
organizations in the
community.
It will build on the
collaborative nature
of CHEP.
Yes
Yes
Yes
013
014
015
016
Yes
No
No
Yes
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
I think the statement
captures what we
were looking for
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
mission statement?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?
No
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way.
I'm not sure I
understand "...that
research has the
greatest impact... as
compared to what?
I would say both yes
and no. Too much
emphasis on collecting
data (research)
without a clear
connection to the
translation of data
collected.
I was hoping for
more than the
"promotion of
collaboration" from
this group.
To promote
collaboration among
community partners
throughout Indiana to
improve research and
translation thereof, by
disseminating and
supporting best
practice and evidence
based programs and
policies to improve
health and healthcare
of Indiana residents.
Is this just a research
project or is it an
action program to
get something
accomplished? I am
frustrated to see
more money soaked
up in "identifying"
the problems, while
the same old
problems are not
solved.
Yes
No
We know the
problems.
No
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?1
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way. 2
Does this make the
assumption that
research done in
collaboration with
providers and
stakeholders has
more impact that
that done by
researchers alone?
"To enhance
collaboration"--I am
booked full. I need
resources to
implement the
existing standards of
practice, not just
collaboration.
...so that CHEP related
initiatives (rather than
just research)have as
their highest priority
impacting the health
of all Hoosiers.
No
by "enriches" do we
mean adding value
to the importance of
evaluation & thus
the attention to &
use of it
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
This doesn't get at
prevention/promotion.
The stakeholders
communicated their
problems in March.
They don't need
another research
project they need
solutions.
Yes
How can this group
"leverage"
resources?
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?1
Based on your introduction to CHEP
at the March 20 meeting, does this
statement reflect what you think an
aim of CHEP ought to be?2
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way. 3
I think this is our
ultimate goal
No
To help stake holder
translate research
findings to improve
health, prevent
disease, reduce
disparities...
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
aim?2
Do you think that a statement such
as this is necessary to convey the
non-duplicative nature of CHEP?
Please provide a brief explanation of
why you feel that way. 4
No
I don't think it is
strong enough...the
information will only
be as good as what is
communicated by
those on the
coalition to other
interested
stakeholders
What changes would you make, if
any, to improve the message
communicated by the proposed
approach statement?
But it's not just a
coalition of
stakeholders...there
needs to be a site
where persons can
go to see what is
already being done
Are there any additional comments
about the mission, aims, or
approach or anything else that you
would like to make?
If you would like us to contact you
regarding your responses, please
feel free to enter your name below?
"To enhance
collaboration"--I am
booked full. I need
resources to
implement the
existing standards of
practice, not just
collaboration.
No
I think it is somewhat
redundant to what is
described in the
mission and aims.
Yes
No
What is usually done
is selecting people or
agencies based on
name recognition
regardless of their
qualifications.